The DOI matches its Crossref record; 224 of the 224 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 4 of the 178 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Obesity and addiction: neurobiological overlaps
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Drug addiction and obesity appear to share several properties. Both can be defined as disorders in which the saliency of a specific type of reward (food or drug) becomes exaggerated relative to, and at the expense of others rewards. Both drugs and food have powerful reinforcing effects, which are in part mediated by abrupt dopamine increases in the brain reward centres. The abrupt dopamine increases, in vulnerable individuals, can override the brain's homeostatic control mechanisms. These parallels have generated interest in understanding the shared vulnerabilities between addiction and obesity. Predictably, they also engendered a heated debate. Specifically, brain imaging studies are beginning to uncover common features between these two conditions and delineate some of the overlapping brain circuits whose dysfunctions may underlie the observed deficits. The combined results suggest that both obese and drug‐addicted individuals suffer from impairments in dopaminergic pathways that regulate neuronal systems associated not only with reward sensitivity and incentive motivation, but also with conditioning, self‐control, stress reactivity and interoceptive awareness. In parallel, studies are also delineating differences between them that centre on the key role that peripheral signals involved with homeostatic control exert on food intake. Here, we focus on the shared neurobiological substrates of obesity and addiction.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This review argues that obesity and drug addiction share overlapping neurobiological substrates, especially disrupted dopamine pathways involved in reward, motivation, conditioning, self-control, stress reactivity, and interoception. It proposes that compulsive food intake and drug taking arise from imbalanced processing across these circuits, while homeostatic and peripheral feeding signals remain a key difference.
Key findings
- Both obese and drug-addicted individuals show impairments in dopaminergic pathways, including lower striatal dopamine D2 receptor (D2R) availability linked to decreased activity in prefrontal regions such as OFC, ACC, and DLPFC, which the paper associates with compulsivity and impulsivity.
- Obese individuals show lower rates of nicotine and marijuana abuse than non-obese individuals, and there is an inverse relationship between BMI and recent illicit drug use; the paper suggests food and drugs may compete for overlapping reward mechanisms.
- Obese individuals exhibit less activation of reward circuits from actual food consumption than lean individuals but greater activation of somatosensory cortical regions processing palatability during anticipation; in non-obese individuals with binge eating disorder, higher dopamine release in dorsal striatum to food cues predicted binge-eating severity.
- In rats, medial habenula mu-opioid peptide binding was approximately 40% higher after palatable-food exposure in those that gained weight; a latent class analysis of 997 fourth graders linked executive function to obesity risk.
Methods
- Narrative review/position paper, not a primary study; it synthesizes human neuroimaging (PET, fMRI), preclinical rodent and non-human primate, clinical, genetic, and pharmacological evidence.
- The review focuses on shared neurobiological substrates of obesity and addiction, comparing circuits for reward/saliency, motivation/drive, conditioning, self-control, interoception, and aversion/stress reactivity.
- Main analysis is qualitative integration of cited literature; no systematic search, meta-analysis, or new data are reported.
Limitations
- Stated in the paper: D2R-BMI studies cannot address causality; one negative D2R study may have been hampered by low statistical power (n = 5/group); some inconsistencies exist among studies; the role of direct versus indirect striatal pathways in eating remains to be explored; and dopamine modulation of insular activity is poorly investigated.
- Evident from the text: this is a selective narrative review without systematic search or formal bias assessment, and it relies heavily on animal models and cross-sectional human imaging, so many cited associations are correlational.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
124 Not checked yet · 47 Own interpretation · 10 No basis given · 2 Partly supported · accuracy not yet measured
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“findings of attenuated responses to drug rewards in animal models of obesity (33,34).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The role of dopamine in acute reward to drugs and food
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [33] Davis JF Tracy AL Schurdak JD Exposure to elevated levels of dietary fat attenuates psychostimulant reward and mesolimbic dopamine turnover in the rat Behav Neurosci 2008 122 1257 1263 19045945 PMC2597276 source
The Results section ('Exposure to dietary fat attenuates amphetamine conditioned place preference'; page not provided) reports that obese high-fat-fed rats did not develop a preference for the amphetamine-paired compartment, unlike chow-fed rats. The same reduced response occurred in high-fat-fed rats that were not obese, so the study does not isolate obesity as its cause. (LLM, conf=0.90)
- Partly supportedcites [34] Wellman PJ Nation JR Davis KW Impairment of acquisition of cocaine self-administration in rats maintained on a high-fat diet Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2007 88 89 93 17764729 PMC2094387 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Abstract reports diminished acquisition of cocaine self-administration in high-fat-fed rats, suggesting reduced cocaine reinforcement. It also states that the effect was not a function of diet-induced obesity. The source therefore supports an attenuated response to cocaine in high-fat-fed rats, but not the broader attribution to obesity or drug rewards generally. (LLM, conf=0.88)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
In the paper
“Using PET to measure brain glucose metabolism in healthy controls, we reported a negative correlation between BMI and metabolic activity in DLPFC, OFC and ACC.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > Overlapping dysfunction in the motivation circuits
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [98] Volkow ND Wang GJ Telang F Inverse association between BMI and prefrontal metabolic activity in healthy adults Obesity 2009 17 60 65 18948965 PMC2681079 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In this study, the metabolic activity in prefrontal regions predicted the subjects’ performance in tests of executive function (98).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > Overlapping dysfunction in the motivation circuits
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [98] Volkow ND Wang GJ Telang F Inverse association between BMI and prefrontal metabolic activity in healthy adults Obesity 2009 17 60 65 18948965 PMC2681079 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“there is an overlap in the neuronal mechanisms implicated in the loss of control and overconsumption of food intake seen in obesity and in the compulsive intake of drugs seen in addiction.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > Background
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“they represent a critical ‘knot’ whose fragilities are bound to underlie dysfunctional responses to a broad array of inputs, including drug and food reward.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > Dopamine at the centre of brain networks mediating reactivity to environmental stimuli
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“for this dimensional analysis also encompasses non-obese individuals suffering from other eating disorders (e.g. binge eating disorder [BED] and anorexia nervosa) (9,10), which are also likely to involve imbalances in reward and self-control circuits.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > Background
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [9] Umberg EN Shader RI Hsu LK Greenblatt DJ From disordered eating to addiction: the ‘food drug’ in bulimia nervosa J Clin Psychopharmacol 2012 32 376 389 22544008 source
- Not checked yetcites [10] Speranza M Revah-Levy A Giquel L An investigation of Goodman’s addictive disorder criteria in eating disorders Eur Eat Disord Rev 2011 20 182 189 21834026 source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Drugs of abuse tap into the neuronal mechanisms that modulate the motivation to consume food”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > Background
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
In the paper
“Multidisciplinary research has linked such powerful craving to adaptations in the brain circuitry in charge of anticipating and assessing reward and learning conditioned associations that drive habits and automatic behaviours (7).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > Background
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [7] Koob GF Le Moal M Drug abuse: hedonic homeostatic dysregulation Science 1997 278 52 58 9311926 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This functional model of addiction can also be used to understand why some obese individuals find it so difficult to properly regulate their caloric intake and maintain energy homeostasis.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > Background
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“feeding behaviours are also influenced by another layer of regulation that involves processing of rewards through DA signalling and its ability to condition food-associated stimuli that then will trigger the desire for the associated food.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > Background
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- It may state two separate claims as one. 60
- Probably not a substantial claim. 12
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“a recent study of siblings discordant for their addiction to stimulant drugs (78) showed brain differences in the morphology of the OFC, which were significantly smaller in the addicted sibling than in controls, whereas in the non-addicted siblings, the OFC did not differ from that of controls (79).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The impact of dysfunction in self-control
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [78] Ersche KD Jones PS Williams GB Turton AJ Robbins TW Bullmore ET Abnormal brain structure implicated in stimulant drug addiction Science 2012 335 601 604 22301321 source
- Could not verifycites [79] Parvaz MA Maloney T Moeller SJ Sensitivity to monetary reward is most severely compromised in recently abstaining cocaine addicted individuals: a cross-sectional ERP study Psychiatry Res 2012 203 75 82 22841343 PMC3444645 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Methods (section 2.1; page unavailable) describe participants with cocaine use disorders and healthy controls, not siblings discordant for addiction. The Results report ERP responses, and searches for OFC morphology and non-addicted siblings found no passage addressing the claimed anatomical comparison. (LLM, conf=0.78)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“stress is not only associated with increased consumption of palatable foods and weight gain, but acute stress also uncovers a strong correlation between BMI and a potentiated activation in response to milkshake consumption in the OFC (59)”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The transition to compulsive consumption
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [59] Rudenga KJ Sinha R Small DM Acute stress potentiates brain response to milkshake as a function of body weight and chronic stress Int J Obes (Lond) 2012 [Epub ahead of print] PMC3381866 22430303 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction reports an association of stress with palatable-food intake and weight gain. The Results (Neuroimaging) find a positive BMI–OFC relationship during stress-related milkshake consumption, but call the correlation “small but significant,” not strong. The study also tested overweight women, a qualification absent from the claim. (LLM, conf=0.88)
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
In the paper
“in non-obese individuals with BED, we documented higher than normal release of DA in dorsal striatum (caudate) when exposed to food cues and this increase predicted the severity of the binge eating behaviours (95).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The impact of dysfunction in self-control
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [95] Wang GJ Geliebter A Volkow ND Enhanced striatal dopamine release during food stimulation in binge eating disorder Obesity 2011 19 1601 1608 21350434 PMC3144277 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“this property of palatable foods used to be advantageous in environments where food sources were scarce and/or unreliable because it ensured that food was eaten when available, enabling energy to be stored in the body (as fat) for future use. However, in societies like ours, where food is plentiful and ubiquitous, this adaptation has become a dangerous liability.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The role of dopamine in acute reward to drugs and food
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the debate over whether obesity reflects ‘food addiction’ fails to consider the dimensional nature of these two disorders.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > Background
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Disruption of the DA reward circuit has been implicated in the loss of control seen in both addiction and obesity (2), although the physiological mechanisms that disrupt the function of the DA striatal circuits, including those implicated in reward (ventral striatum) and in habit formation (dorsal striatum), present clear divergences (3).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > Background
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [2] Volkow ND Wang GJ Fowler JS Tomasi D Baler R Food and drug reward: overlapping circuits in human obesity and addiction Curr Top Behav Neurosci 2011 11 1 24 22016109 source
- Not checked yetcites [3] Ziauddeen H Fletcher P Is food addiction a valid and useful concept? Obes Rev 2012 in press PMC3561707 23057499
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“just as most individuals that consume drugs are not addicted, most individuals that eat excessively retain control over their food intake in some instances but not in others.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > Background
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“neurotransmitters implicated in drug-seeking behaviours are also implicated in food intake and, conversely, that peptides that regulate food intake also influence the reinforcing effects of drugs”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > Background
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Tables 1 and 2
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“the regulation of eating behaviours and hence the responses to food, are modulated by multiple peripheral and central mechanisms that directly or indirectly convey information to the brain’s DA reward pathway with a particular prominent role of the hypothalamus”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > Background
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Fig. 1
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Eating behaviours present a great example of this architecture where the hypothalamus subserves the ‘knot’ of the metabolic bowtie (Fig. 3a) and the DA pathways subserve the ‘knot’ for reactivity to salient external stimuli (including drugs and food) and internal signals”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > Dopamine at the centre of brain networks mediating reactivity to environmental stimuli
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Fig. 3a
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“studies are also delineating differences between them that centre on the key role that peripheral signals involved with homeostatic control exert on food intake.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“certain foods, particularly those rich in sugars and fat, are potently rewarding (13) and can trigger addictive-like behaviours in laboratory animals (14,15).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The role of dopamine in acute reward to drugs and food
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [13] Lenoir M Serre F Cantin L Ahmed SH Intense sweetness surpasses cocaine reward Plos ONE 2007 2 e698 17668074 PMC1931610 source
- Not checked yetcites [14] Avena NM Rada P Hoebel BG Evidence for sugar addiction: behavioral and neurochemical effects of intermittent, excessive sugar intake Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2008 32 20 39 17617461 PMC2235907 source
- Not checked yetcites [15] Avena NM Rada P Hoebel BG Sugar and fat bingeing have notable differences in addictive-like behavior J Nutr 2009 139 623 628 19176748 PMC2714381 source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is when these patterns (loss of control and compulsive intake) become rigid and dictate the behaviour and choices of the individual, despite their adverse consequences, that a pathological state akin to the concept of addiction can be invoked.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > Background
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“High-calorie foods can promote over-eating (i.e. eating that is uncoupled from energetic needs) and trigger learned associations between the stimulus and the reward (conditioning).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The role of dopamine in acute reward to drugs and food
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The overwhelming urge to seek and consume a drug is one of the hallmarks of addiction.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > Background
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“there are impairments in circuits involved with self-control and decision-making, interoception and mood and stress regulation (8).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > Background
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [8] Volkow ND Wang GJ Fowler JS Tomasi D Telang F Baler R Addiction: decreased reward sensitivity and increased expectation sensitivity conspire to overwhelm the brain’s control circuit BioEssay 2010 32 748 755 PMC2948245 20730946 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“brain imaging studies are beginning to uncover common features between these two conditions and delineate some of the overlapping brain circuits whose dysfunctions may underlie the observed deficits.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > Abstract
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“these two diseases share neurobiological processes that, when disrupted, can result in compulsive consumption and loss of control in a dimensional continuum, while also involving unique neurobiological processes”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > Background
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“the response to foods in humans, is far more complex, and is influenced not just by its palatability but also by its availability (the patterns of restriction plus overeating, referred to as the eating topography (16)), its visual appeal, economics and incentives (i.e., ‘super sizing’ offers, soda combos), social routines for eating, alternative reinforcement and advertisements (17).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The role of dopamine in acute reward to drugs and food
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“evidence has been accumulating that comparable dopaminergic responses are linked with food reward and that these mechanisms are likely to play a role in excessive food consumption and obesity.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The role of dopamine in acute reward to drugs and food
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Drugs of abuse act on the reward and ancillary circuits through different mechanisms; however, they all lead to sharp DA increases in the NAc.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The role of dopamine in acute reward to drugs and food
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“healthy human volunteers show robust striatal activation upon receipt of a milkshake, and that frequent ice cream consumption blunts the striatal responses (46).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The role of dopamine in acute reward to drugs and food
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [46] Burger KS Stice E Frequent ice cream consumption is associated with reduced striatal response to receipt of an ice cream-based milkshake Am J Clin Nutr 2012 95 810 817 22338036 PMC3302359 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“whereas inherently rewarding novel stimuli engage ventral regions of the striatum (NAc), with repeated exposure, the cues associated with the reward then trigger DA increases in dorsal regions of the striatum (50).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The transition to compulsive consumption
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [50] Robbins TW Cador M Taylor JR Everitt BJ Limbic-striatal interactions in reward-related processes Neurosci Biobehav Rev 1989 13 155 162 2682402 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“peripheral signals that modulate food intake exert their actions in part by hypothalamic signalling to VTA but also by their direct effects on the VTA DA meso-accumbens and meso-limbic pathways.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The role of dopamine in acute reward to drugs and food
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In humans, there have been reports of an inverse relationship between body mass index (BMI) and recent illicit drug use (35) and of an association between obesity and a lower risk for substance use disorders (36).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The role of dopamine in acute reward to drugs and food
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [35] Bluml V Kapusta N Vyssoki B Kogoj D Walter H Lesch OM Relationship between substance use and body mass index in young males Am J Addict 2012 21 72 77 22211349 source
- Not checked yetcites [36] Simon G Von Korff M Saunders K Association between obesity and psychiatric disorders in the US adult population Arch Gen Psychiatry 2006 63 824 830 16818872 PMC1913935 source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“once conditioning has occurred, DA signals act as a predictor of reward (49), incentivizing the animal to perform the behaviour that will result in consuming the expected reward (drug or food).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The transition to compulsive consumption
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [49] Schultz W Dopamine signals for reward value and risk: basic and recent data Behav Brain Funct 2010 6 24 20416052 PMC2876988 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“stimuli that cause fast and large increases in DA induce conditioned responses and elicit incentive motivation to procure them (48).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The transition to compulsive consumption
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [48] Owesson-White CA Ariansen J Stuber GD Neural encoding of cocaine-seeking behavior is coincident with phasic dopamine release in the accumbens core and shell Eur J Neurosci 2009 30 1117 1127 19735286 PMC3107700 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“This is consistent with preclinical (40) and clinical (41) studies showing dynamic associations between the changes in neuroendocrine hormones (e.g. insulin, leptin, ghrelin) triggered by food restriction and brain DA signalling and those of recent reports of a relationship between addictive personality and maladaptive eating behaviours following bariatric surgery (42,43).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The role of dopamine in acute reward to drugs and food
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [40] Thanos PK Michaelides M Piyis YK Wang GJ Volkow ND Food restriction markedly increases dopamine D2 receptor (D2R) in a rat model of obesity as assessed with in-vivo muPET imaging ([11C] raclopride) and in-vitro ([3H] spiperone) autoradiography Synapse 2008 62 50 61 17960763 source
- Not checked yetcites [41] Dunn JP Kessler RM Feurer ID Relationship of dopamine type 2 receptor binding potential with fasting neuroendocrine hormones and insulin sensitivity in human obesity Diabetes Care 2012 35 1105 1111 22432117 PMC3329842 source
- Not checked yetcites [42] Lent MR Swencionis C Addictive personality and maladaptive eating behaviors in adults seeking bariatric surgery Eat Behav 2012 13 67 70 22177401 source
- Not checked yetcites [43] King WC Chen JY Mitchell JE Prevalence of alcohol use disorders before and after bariatric surgery JAMA 2012 307 2516 2525 22710289 PMC3682834 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“downstream adaptations are likely to be involved in the loss of control over food intake just as is the case for drug intake.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The role of dopamine in acute reward to drugs and food
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“anorexigenic peptides (e.g. insulin, leptin, PYY) decrease the sensitivity of the brain reward system to food reward, whereas orexigenic ones (e.g. ghrelin) increase it (see review (47)).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The role of dopamine in acute reward to drugs and food
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [47] Volkow ND Wang GJ Baler RD Reward, dopamine and the control of food intake: implications for obesity Trends Cogn Sci 2011 15 37 46 21109477 PMC3124340 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Orexigenic peptides/hormones increase the activity of VTA DA cells and increase DA release in NAc (main target of VTA DA neurons) when exposed to food stimuli, whereas anorexigenic ones inhibit DA firing and decrease DA release (23).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The role of dopamine in acute reward to drugs and food
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [23] Opland DM Leinninger GM Myers MG Jr Modulation of the mesolimbic dopamine system by leptin Brain Res 2011 1350 65 70 20417193 PMC2921997 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“obese individuals show lower rates of nicotine (37) and marijuana abuse (38) than non-obese individuals.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The role of dopamine in acute reward to drugs and food
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [37] Blendy JA Strasser A Walters CL Reduced nicotine reward in obesity: cross-comparison in human and mouse Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2005 180 306 315 15719224 source
- Not checked yetcites [38] Warren M Frost-Pineda K Gold M Body mass index and marijuana use J Addict Dis 2005 24 95 100 16186086 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“inhibition of striatal D2R or activation of D1R-expressing striatal neurons (which mediate signalling in the striatal direct pathway) enhance the sensitivity to the rewarding effects of drugs (71–73).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The impact of dysfunction in self-control
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [71] Ferguson SM Eskenazi D Ishikawa M Transient neuronal inhibition reveals opposing roles of indirect and direct pathways in sensitization Nat Neurosci 2010 14 22 24 21131952 PMC3058296 source
- Not checked yetcites [72] Hikida T Kimura K Wada N Funabiki K Nakanishi S Distinct roles of synaptic transmission in direct and indirect striatal pathways to reward and aversive behavior Neuron 2010 66 896 907 20620875 source
- Not checked yetcites [73] Lobo MK Covington HE3rd Chaudhury D Cell type-specific loss of BDNF signaling mimics optogenetic control of cocaine reward Science 2010 330 385 390 20947769 PMC3011229 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“when non-obese male subjects were asked to inhibit their craving for food while being exposed to food cues, they exhibited decreased metabolic activity in amygdala and OFC (as well as in hippocampus), insula and striatum, and that the decreases in OFC were associated with reductions in food craving (56).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The transition to compulsive consumption
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [56] Wang GJ Volkow ND Telang F Evidence of gender differences in the ability to inhibit brain activation elicited by food stimulation Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009 106 1249 1254 19164587 PMC2633545 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The dependence of the responses to food cues on the nutrition status (60,61) highlights the role of the homeostatic network in the control of the reward network, which in turn is also influenced by neuronal pathways that process stress.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The transition to compulsive consumption
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [60] Bragulat V Dzemidzic M Bruno C Food-related odor probes of brain reward circuits during hunger: a pilot FMRI study Obesity (Silver Spring) 2012 18 1566 1571 20339365 source
- Not checked yetcites [61] Stockburger J Schmalzle R Flaisch T Bublatzky F Schupp HT The impact of hunger on food cue processing: an event-related brain potential study Neuroimage 2009 47 1819 1829 19409497 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Both preclinical and clinical studies have provided evidence of decreases in striatal D2R, which, through the NAc, are linked with reward and through the dorsal striatum with the establishment of habits and routines in obesity (80–82).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The impact of dysfunction in self-control
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [80] Geiger BM Haburcak M Avena NM Moyer MC Hoebel BG Pothos EN Deficits of mesolimbic dopamine neurotransmission in rat dietary obesity Neuroscience 2009 159 1193 1199 19409204 PMC2677693 source
- Not checked yetcites [81] Wang GJ Volkow ND Logan J Brain dopamine and obesity Lancet 2001 357 354 357 11210998 source
- Not checked yetcites [82] de Weijer BA van de Giessen E van Amelsvoort TA Lower striatal dopamine D2/3 receptor availability in obese compared with non-obese subjects EJNMMI Res 2012 1 37 22214469 PMC3265412 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“because impairments in OFC and ACC are associated with compulsive behaviours and impulsivity, DA’s impaired modulation of these regions is likely to contribute to the compulsive and impulsive drug intake seen in addiction (76).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The impact of dysfunction in self-control
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [76] Goldstein RZ Volkow ND Drug addiction and its underlying neurobiological basis: neuroimaging evidence for the involvement of the frontal cortex Am J Psychiatry 2002 159 1642 1652 12359667 PMC1201373 source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In the striatum, D2Rs mediate signalling in the striatal indirect pathway that modulates frontal cortical regions; and their down-regulation enhances sensitization to the effects of drugs in animal models (68), whereas their up-regulation interferes with drug consumption (69,70).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The impact of dysfunction in self-control
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [68] Ferguson SM Eskenazi D Ishikawa M Transient neuronal inhibition reveals opposing roles of indirect and direct pathways in sensitization Nat Neurosci 2011 14 22 24 21131952 PMC3058296 source
- Not checked yetcites [69] Thanos PK Michaelides M Umegaki H Volkow ND D2R DNA transfer into the nucleus accumbens attenuates cocaine self-administration in rats Synapse 2008 62 481 486 18418874 PMC2659016 source
- Not checked yetcites [70] Thanos PK Volkow ND Freimuth P Overexpression of dopamine D2 receptors reduces alcohol self-administration J Neurochem 2001 78 1094 1103 11553683 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A reverse scenario would depend on a pre-existing vulnerability for drug use in prefrontal regions, possibly exacerbated by further decreases in striatal D2R triggered by repeated drug use.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The impact of dysfunction in self-control
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This suggests that, in these subjects at risk for alcoholism, the normal prefrontal function was linked to enhanced striatal D2R signalling, which in turn may have protected them from alcohol abuse.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The impact of dysfunction in self-control
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Given that dysfunction in OFC and ACC results in compulsivity (see review (85)), this might be part of the mechanism by which low-striatal D2R signalling facilitates hyperphagia (86,87).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The impact of dysfunction in self-control
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [85] Fineberg NA Potenza MN Chamberlain SR Probing compulsive and impulsive behaviors, from animal models to endophenotypes: a narrative review Neuropsychopharmacology 2009 35 591 604 19940844 PMC3055606 source
- Not checked yetcites [86] Davis LM Michaelides M Cheskin LJ Bromocriptine administration reduces hyperphagia and adiposity and differentially affects dopamine D2 receptor and transporter binding in leptin-receptor-deficient Zucker rats and rats with diet-induced obesity Neuroendocrinology 2009 89 152 162 18984941 PMC2681080 source
- Not checked yetcites [87] Holsen LM Savage CR Martin LE Importance of reward and prefrontal circuitry in hunger and satiety: Prader-Willi syndrome vs. simple obesity Int J Obes (Lond) 2012 36 638 647 22024642 PMC3270121 source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“the negative correlation between BMI and striatal D2R reported in obese (81) and in overweight (96) individuals, as well as the correlation between BMI and decreased blood flow in prefrontal regions in healthy individuals (97,98) and decreased prefrontal metabolism in obese subjects (63) support this.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The impact of dysfunction in self-control
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [81] Wang GJ Volkow ND Logan J Brain dopamine and obesity Lancet 2001 357 354 357 11210998 source
- Not checked yetcites [96] Haltia LT Rinne JO Merisaari H Effects of intravenous glucose on dopaminergic function in the human brain in vivo Synapse 2007 61 748 756 17568412 source
- Not checked yetcites [97] Willeumier KC Taylor DV Amen DG Elevated BMI is associated with decreased blood flow in the prefrontal cortex using SPECT imaging in healthy adults Obesity (Silver Spring) 2011 19 1095 1097 21311507 PMC3125099 source
- Not checked yetcites [98] Volkow ND Wang GJ Telang F Inverse association between BMI and prefrontal metabolic activity in healthy adults Obesity 2009 17 60 65 18948965 PMC2681079 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These processes are modulated by D1R and D2R (presumably also D4R) and thus, the decreased activity in PFC, both in addiction and in obesity, is likely to contribute to poor self-control, impulsivity and high compulsivity.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The impact of dysfunction in self-control
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This suggests a dynamic interaction between the amount of food eaten (reflected in part in the BMI) and the reactivity of reward regions to high-calorie food (reflected in the activation of OFC and ACC) in normal-weight individuals but which was not observed in obese individuals.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The impact of dysfunction in self-control
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“while these studies cannot address the question of whether the emerging association between low D2R and high BMI points to causality”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The impact of dysfunction in self-control
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The prefrontal cortex (PFC) plays a crucial role in executive function, including self-control.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The impact of dysfunction in self-control
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The lower-than-normal availability of D2R in the striatum of obese individuals, which has been associated with reduced activity in PFC and ACC (63) is therefore likely to contribute to their deficient control over food intake.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The impact of dysfunction in self-control
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [63] Volkow ND Wang GJ Telang F Low dopamine striatal D2 receptors are associated with prefrontal metabolism in obese subjects: possible contributing factors Neuroimage 2008 42 1537 1543 18598772 PMC2659013 source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“decreased striatal D2R availability has been linked to compulsive food intake in obese rodents (84) and with decreased metabolic activity in OFC and ACC in obese humans (63).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The impact of dysfunction in self-control
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [84] Johnson PM Kenny PJ Dopamine D2 receptors in addictionlike reward dysfunction and compulsive eating in obese rats Nat Neurosci 2010 13 635 641 20348917 PMC2947358 source
- Not checked yetcites [63] Volkow ND Wang GJ Telang F Low dopamine striatal D2 receptors are associated with prefrontal metabolism in obese subjects: possible contributing factors Neuroimage 2008 42 1537 1543 18598772 PMC2659013 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“An enhanced activity in brain regions that process palatability could make obese subjects favour food over other natural reinforcers, whereas decreased activation of dopaminergic targets by the actual food consumption might lead to overconsumption as a means to compensate for weak D2R-mediated signalling (93).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The impact of dysfunction in self-control
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [93] Stice E Spoor S Bohon C Small DM Relation between obesity and blunted striatal response to food is moderated by TaqIA A1 allele Science 2008 322 449 452 18927395 PMC2681095 source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“since decreased striatal D2R-related signalling is also likely to reduce the sensitivity to other natural rewards, this deficit in obese individuals may also contribute to compensatory overeating (88).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The impact of dysfunction in self-control
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [88] Geiger BM Behr GG Frank LE Evidence for defective mesolimbic dopamine exocytosis in obesity-prone rats FASEB J 2008 22 2740 2746 18477764 PMC2728544 source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“obese individuals exhibited less activation of reward circuits from actual food consumption (consummatory food reward) than lean individuals, whereas they showed greater activation of somatosensory cortical regions that process palatability when they anticipated consumption (91).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The impact of dysfunction in self-control
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [91] Stice E Spoor S Bohon C Veldhuizen MG Small DM Relation of reward from food intake and anticipated food intake to obesity: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study J Abnorm Psychol 2008 117 924 935 19025237 PMC2681092 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“PET studies with FDG to measure brain glucose metabolism in normal-weight individuals reported that exposure to food cues increased metabolic activity in OFC, which was associated with the desire for the food (117).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > Overlapping dysfunction in the motivation circuits
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [117] Wang GJ Volkow ND Telang F Exposure to appetitive food stimuli markedly activates the human brain Neuroimage 2004 21 1790 1797 15050599 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“For example, an MRI study done in elderly women, using voxel-based morphometry, found a negative correlation between BMI and grey matter volumes (including frontal regions), which, in the OFC, was associated with impaired executive function (126).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > Overlapping dysfunction in the motivation circuits
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [126] Walther K Birdsill AC Glisky EL Ryan L Structural brain differences and cognitive functioning related to body mass index in older females Hum Brain Mapp 2010 31 1052 1064 19998366 PMC6870943 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Moreover, when the responses to i.v. methylphenidate are compared between cocaine-addicted and non-addicted individuals, the former responded with increased metabolism in ventral ACC and medial OFC (an effect associated with craving), while the latter showed decreased metabolism in these regions (114).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > Overlapping dysfunction in the motivation circuits
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [114] Volkow ND Wang GJ Ma Y Activation of orbital and medial prefrontal cortex by methylphenidate in cocaine-addicted subjects but not in controls: relevance to addiction J Neurosci 2005 25 3932 3939 15829645 PMC6724925 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The enhanced OFC activation by the food stimulation is likely to reflect downstream dopaminergic effects and participate in DA’s involvement in the drive for food consumption.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > Overlapping dysfunction in the motivation circuits
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Another study found no differences in grey matter volumes between obese and lean subjects; however, it did record a positive correlation between white matter volume in basal brain structures and waist to hip ratios, a trend that was partially reversed by dieting (129).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > Overlapping dysfunction in the motivation circuits
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [129] Haltia LT Viljanen A Parkkola R Brain white matter expansion in human obesity and the recovering effect of dieting J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2007 92 3278 3284 17536002 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Because drug taking becomes the main motivational drive in drug addiction (110), addicted subjects are aroused and motivated by the process of obtaining the drug but tend to become withdrawn and apathetic when exposed to non–drug-related activities.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > Overlapping dysfunction in the motivation circuits
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [110] Volkow ND Fowler JS Wang GJ The addicted human brain: insights from imaging studies J Clin Invest 2003 111 1444 1451 12750391 PMC155054 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This suggests that the activation of these prefrontal regions with drug exposure may be specific to addiction and associated with the enhanced desire for the drug.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > Overlapping dysfunction in the motivation circuits
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In contrast, when tasting sucrose, subjects who have recovered from anorexia nervosa show less insular activation and no association with feelings of pleasantness as observed in controls (145).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The involvement of interoceptive circuitry
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [145] Wagner A Aizenstein H Mazurkewicz L Altered insula response to taste stimuli in individuals recovered from restricting-type anorexia nervosa Neuropsychopharmacology 2008 33 513 523 17487228 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The insula, particularly its more anterior regions, is reciprocally connected to several limbic regions (e.g. ventromedial prefrontal cortex, amygdala, and ventral striatum) and appears to have an interoceptive function, integrating the autonomic and visceral information with emotion and motivation, thus providing conscious awareness of these urges (135).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The involvement of interoceptive circuitry
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [135] Naqvi NH Bechara A The hidden island of addiction: the insula Trends Neurosci 2009 32 56 67 18986715 PMC3698860 source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“For example, when normal-weight women tasted a sweetener with calories (sucrose), both the insula and dopaminergic midbrain areas became activated, whereas tasting a calorie-free sweetener (sucralose) only activated the insula (144).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The involvement of interoceptive circuitry
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [144] Frank GK Oberndorfer TA Simmons AN Sucrose activates human taste pathways differently from artificial sweetener Neuroimage 2008 39 1559 1569 18096409 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The observed changes suggest excessive input from the amygdala and insula; these, in turn could trigger exaggerated stimulus-response learning and incentive motivation to food cues in the dorsal caudate nucleus, which could become overwhelming in light of weak inhibitory control by fronto-cortical regions.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The involvement of interoceptive circuitry
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Similar antireward responses (including increased stress reactivity, negative mood and discomfort) may also contribute to excessive food consumption in obesity and to the high propensity to relapse when dieting after exposure to a stressful or frustrating event.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The circuitry of aversion and stress reactivity
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Findings from animal models of cocaine addiction and palatable-food-induced obesity can be generalized to human addiction and obesity.
In the paper
“A highly palatable food diet can induce obesity in rats, with the weight increases correlating with increases in m-opioid peptide binding in the basolateral and basomedial amygdala.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The circuitry of aversion and stress reactivity
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [157] Smith SL Harrold JA Williams G Diet-induced obesity increases mu opioid receptor binding in specific regions of the rat brain Brain Res 2002 953 215 222 12384255 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Moreover, neurons in the rostromedial tegmental nucleus, which receive a major input from the lateral habenula, project to VTA DA neurons and are activated after food deprivation (158).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The circuitry of aversion and stress reactivity
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [158] Jhou TC Fields HL Baxter MG Saper CB Holland PC The rostromedial tegmental nucleus (RMTg), a GABAergic afferent to midbrain dopamine neurons, encodes aversive stimuli and inhibits motor responses Neuron 2009 61 786 800 19285474 PMC2841475 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The many mechanistic and behavioural parallels identified between addiction and obesity suggest the value of multipronged parallel therapeutic approaches for both of these disorders.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > In closing
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The picture that is emerging is that obesity, similar to drug addiction (226), appears to result from imbalanced processing in a range of regions implicated in reward/saliency, motivation/drive, emotion/stress reactivity, memory/conditioning, executive function/self-control and interoception, in addition to possible imbalances in the homeostatic regulation of food intake.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > In closing
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [226] Carnell S Gibson C Benson L Ochner CN Geliebter A Neuroimaging and obesity: current knowledge and future directions Obes Rev 2011 13 43 56 21902800 PMC3241905 source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Brain activation or metabolism differences observed in obese versus lean individuals reflect dysfunction in the underlying circuits rather than consequences of obesity.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Also, whether tested during early or protracted periods of abstinence/ dieting, addicted/obese subjects show lower D2R in striatum (including NAc), which are associated with decreases in baseline activity in frontal brain regions implicated in salience attribution (OFC) and inhibitory control (ACC and DLPFC), whose disruption results in compulsivity and impulsivity.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > In closing
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
Findings from rodent and non-human primate models of drug and food reward can be generalized to human obesity and addiction.
“Experiments in rodents have shown that, upon first exposure to a food reward, the firing of DA neurons in the VTA increases with a resulting increase in DA release in NAc (22).”
The paper relies on this without support.
Brain imaging signals such as striatal activation and D2R availability index the reward, motivation, and self-control processes discussed.
“Brain imaging studies are beginning to provide important clues about such overlapping functional circuitry.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Findings from animal models of cocaine addiction and palatable-food-induced obesity can be generalized to human addiction and obesity.
“The habenula appears to play a similar role with regards to food reward.”
“These findings are consistent with a role for the habenula (both medial and lateral) in mediating responses to aversive stimuli or to states of deprivation such as during dieting or drug withdrawal.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Brain activation or metabolism differences observed in obese versus lean individuals reflect dysfunction in the underlying circuits rather than consequences of obesity.
“In spite of some inconsistencies among studies, brain imaging data also support the notion that structural and functional changes in brain regions implicated in executive function (including inhibitory control) may be associated with high BMI in otherwise healthy individuals.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“It can also interfere with action plans, favoring immediate rewards over long-term benefits [32].”
From Social Media Algorithms and Teen Addiction: Neurophysiological Impact and Ethical Considerations (2025) · cites this paper as [32]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Reward mechanisms, important in both AUD and food overconsumption behavior, are driven by a disparity between expected effects and reduced rewards. This is believed to be associated with lower dopamine receptor levels in the striatum”
From A Narrative Review of Current and Emerging Trends in the Treatment of Alcohol Use Disorder (2024) · cites this paper as [94]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“Neurobiological overlaps between obesity and addiction have been described within the mesolimbic pathway between the ventral tegmental area (VTA) and the ventral striatum, with further projection to limbic (amygdala and hippocampus) and cortical regions (prefrontal cortex [PFC] and cingulate gyrus) [64].”
From Food Addiction and Psychosocial Adversity: Biological Embedding, Contextual Factors, and Public Health Implications (2020) · cites this paper as [64]
In the citing paper
“Neuroimaging studies have identified some of the brain mechanisms associated with obesity and food addiction 39, 40, demonstrating alterations in the core reward network (e.g. nucleus accumbens) and the extended reward network (i.e. emotion regulation, executive control, salience and somatosensory networks) 41, 42, 43.”
From History of early life adversity is associated with increased food addiction and sex-specific alterations in reward network connectivity in obesity (2019) · cites this paper as [40]
In the citing paper
“Similar to other addictive disorders in which perturbations in brain regions within the core and extended reward networks have been reported, a less responsive dopamine system leads to a greater propensity towards obesity 40, 85, 86, 87, 88.”
From History of early life adversity is associated with increased food addiction and sex-specific alterations in reward network connectivity in obesity (2019) · cites this paper as [40]
In the citing paper
“Food addiction has been implicated in obesity as a result of alterations in the extended reward network 39, 40, 94; the somatosensory network represents an important component of the extended reward network, playing a key role in interoceptive and sensory awareness and generating appropriate motor responses 41, 100, 101.”
From History of early life adversity is associated with increased food addiction and sex-specific alterations in reward network connectivity in obesity (2019) · cites this paper as [40]
In the citing paper
“These study results are consistent with previous studies, which have demonstrated decreased functional activation and anatomical connectivity of somatosensory regions in obesity 40, 41, 53, 56, 57, 98, 99.”
From History of early life adversity is associated with increased food addiction and sex-specific alterations in reward network connectivity in obesity (2019) · cites this paper as [40]
In the citing paper
“The findings reported here, which suggest that men with high BMI differ from their female counterparts in the processing and modulation of rewarding food stimuli, may be attributed to the ability of oestrogen to modulate dopaminergic and serotonergic signalling 40, 111.”
From History of early life adversity is associated with increased food addiction and sex-specific alterations in reward network connectivity in obesity (2019) · cites this paper as [40]
In the citing paper
“Specifically, several hormones and neuropeptides involved in energy homeostasis influence the DA reward pathway (9).”
From The Addictive Dimensionality of Obesity (2013) · cites this paper as [9]
In the citing paper
“Predictably then, many neurotransmitters implicated in drug-seeking behaviors are also implicated in food intake (9).”
From The Addictive Dimensionality of Obesity (2013) · cites this paper as [9]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The impact of dysfunction in self-control
“whereas in the non-addicted siblings, the OFC did not differ from that of controls (79).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > References
“79. Parvaz MA Maloney T Moeller SJ Sensitivity to monetary reward is most severely compromised in recently abstaining cocaine addicted individuals: a cross-sectional ERP study Psychiatry Res 2012 203 75 82 22841343 PMC3444645”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The impact of dysfunction in self-control
“The hypothesis of compensatory overeating is consistent with preclinical evidence showing that decreased DA activity in VTA results in a dramatic increase in the consumption of high-fat foods (89).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > References
“89. Stoeckel LE Weller RE Cook EW3rd Twieg DB Knowlton RC Cox JE Widespread reward-system activation in obese women in response to pictures of high-calorie foods Neuroimage 2008 41 636 647 18413289”
Citations
Cites
Items 201–224 of 224
Bezzina, G., Body, S., Cheung, T. H. C., Hampson, C. L., Bradshaw, C. M., Szabadi, E., Anderson, I. M., & Deakin, J. F. W. (2008) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2008.03.041 · Cited by 37 · cited 1×
“Interestingly, delay discounting seems to depend on the function of the ventral striatum (104) and of the PFC, including OFC (105) and its connections to the NAc (106), and is sensitive to DA manipulations (107).”
BackgroundForebrain circuits and control of feeding by learned cues
Petrovich, G. D. (2011) · Neurobiology of Learning and Memory · doi:10.1016/j.nlm.2010.10.003 · Cited by 37
Caberlotto, L., Rimondini, R., Hansson, A. C., Eriksson, S., & Heilig, M. A. (2003) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/sj.npp.1300296 · Cited by 37
Gutiérrez, R., Lobo, M. K., Zhang, F., & de Lecea, L. (2011) · IUBMB Life · doi:10.1002/iub.539 · Cited by 37
Proudnikov, D., Hamon, S., Ott, J., & Kreek, M. J. (2008) · Neuroscience Letters · doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2008.02.042 · Cited by 36
Barson, J. R., Morganstern, I., & LEIBOWITZ, S. F. (2010) · Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Polarization Phenomena in Nuclear Reactions · doi:10.1007/978-3-0346-0228-0_8 · Cited by 36
Addictive personality and maladaptive eating behaviors in adults seeking bariatric surgery
Lent, M. R., & Swencionis, C. (2012) · Eating Behaviors · doi:10.1016/j.eatbeh.2011.10.006 · Cited by 36
Ernst, A., Ma, D., García‐Pérez, I., Tsang, T. M., Kluge, W. F., Schwarz, E., Guest, P. C., Holmes, E. C., Sarnyai, Z., & Bahn, S. (2012) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/pr300197d · Cited by 35
An Investigation of Goodman's Addictive Disorder Criteria in Eating Disorders
Speranza, M., Revah‐Levy, A., Giquel, L., Loas, G., Venisse, J., Jeammet, P., & Corcos, M. (2012) · European Eating Disorders Review · doi:10.1002/erv.1140 · Cited by 32
Hypothalamic and hindbrain NPY, AGRP and NE increase consummatory feeding responses
Taylor, K., Lester, E., Hudson, B. D., & Ritter, S. (2007) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2006.12.014 · Cited by 29
Ögren, S. O., Razani, H., Elvander-Tottie, E., & Kehr, J. (2007) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.05.022 · Cited by 29
Zambello, E., Jiménez-Vasquez, P. A., Khoury, A. E., Mathé, A. A., & Caberlotto, L. (2007) · Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.pnpbp.2007.11.008 · Cited by 27
Stimulation of lateral hypothalamic AMPA receptors may induce feeding in rats
Hettes, S. R., Gonzaga, W. J., Heyming, T. W., Nguyen, J. K., Perez, S. D., & Stanley, B. G. (2010) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2010.05.008 · Cited by 27
Self‐reported weight gain following smoking cessation: A function of binge eating behavior
White, M. A., Masheb, R. M., & Grilo, C. M. (2009) · International Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1002/eat.20729 · Cited by 25
What does the habenula tell dopamine neurons?
Kimura, M., Satoh, T., & Matsumoto, N. (2007) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn0607-677 · Cited by 24
Subiah, C. O., Mabandla, M. V., Phulukdaree, A., Chuturgoon, A. A., & Daniels, W. M. U. (2012) · Metabolic Brain Disease · doi:10.1007/s11011-012-9297-7 · Cited by 24
Beinfeld, M. C. (2003) · Life Sciences · doi:10.1016/s0024-3205(03)00384-9 · Cited by 24
N. Kearns, D., A. Gomez-Serrano, M., & J. Tunstall, B. (2011) · Current Drug Abuse Reviewse · doi:10.2174/1874473711104040261 · Cited by 22
Feeding and reward: Ontogenetic changes in an animal model of obesity
Marco, A., Schroeder, M., & Weller, A. (2012) · Neuropharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2012.02.019 · Cited by 20
Antinociceptive effects of galanin in the nucleus accumbens of rats
Xu, S., Li, J., Zhang, J., et al. (2012) · Neuroscience Letters · doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2012.05.027 · Cited by 16
Crawley, J. N. (1985) · PubMed · Cited by 10
Miszkiel, J., Kruk, M., McCreary, A. C., Przegaliński, E., Biała, G., & Filip, M. (2011) · Pharmacological Reports · doi:10.1016/s1734-1140(11)70720-4 · Cited by 7
Strat, Y. L., & Dubertret, C. (2011) · La Presse Médicale · doi:10.1016/j.lpm.2011.05.012 · Cited by 4
Volkow, N. D., Wang, G.-J., Begleiter, H., Porjesz, B., Fowler, J. S., Telang, F., Wong, C., Ma, Y., Logan, J., Goldstein, R., et al. (2006) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.63.9.999 · Cited by 2
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- 10.1038/nn.2703 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6326-11.2012 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pharmacological Management of Obesity: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline
Apovian, C. M., Aronne, L. J., Bessesen, D. H., McDonnell, M. E., Murad, M. H., Pagotto, U., Ryan, D. H., & Still, C. D. (2015) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2014-3415 · Cited by 1,347
Metabolism disrupting chemicals and metabolic disorders
Heindel, J. J., Blumberg, B., Cave, M., Machtinger, R., Mantovani, A., Mendez, M. A., Nadal, A., Palanza, P., Panzica, G., Sargis, R., et al. (2017) · Reproductive Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.reprotox.2016.10.001 · Cited by 1,101
Development of the Yale Food Addiction Scale Version 2.0
Gearhardt, A. N., Corbin, W. R., & Brownell, K. D. (2016) · Psychology of Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1037/adb0000136 · Cited by 740
Food cue reactivity and craving predict eating and weight gain: A meta-analytic review
Boswell, R. G., & Kober, H. (2016) · Obesity Reviews · doi:10.1111/obr.12354 · Cited by 703
Tomiyama, A. J. (2019) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102936 · Cited by 695
“Dopamine is a neurotransmitter that codes for pleasure and enhances the desire for food (Volkow et al. 2013).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Volkow, N. D., Wang, G. ‐., Tomasi, D., & Baler, R. D.
- Affiliations
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- Brookhaven National Laboratory (US)
- Corresponding author
- Volkow, N. D.
- Venue
- Obesity Reviews
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-09-27
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 2-18
- ISSN
- 1467-7881 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-789X
- PMC
- PMC4827343
- OpenAlex
- W1780379214
- Semantic Scholar
- d0d3429f0da3f6b9065a66bb07312bf81e831063
- Cited by
- 800
- References
- 224
- Citations by year
- 2026: 44 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 65 · 2021: 60 · 2020: 111 · 2019: 57 · 2018: 69 · 2017: 57 · 2016: 60 · 2015: 70 · 2014: 67 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 5.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Obesity Reviews (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (ZIAAA000550)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
- Keywords
- obesity, drug addiction, reward salience, dopamine, brain reward circuits, homeostatic regulation, food intake regulation, incentive motivation, self-control, stress reactivity, interoceptive awareness, neuroimaging
- MeSH terms
- Brain, Dopamine, Eating, Humans, Models, Biological, Neural Pathways, Obesity, Reward, Comorbidity, Behavior, Addictive, Substance-Related Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-09, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-09 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review