The DOI matches its Crossref record; 224 of the 224 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 6 of the 178 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Obesity and addiction: neurobiological overlaps
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Drug addiction and obesity appear to share several properties. Both can be defined as disorders in which the saliency of a specific type of reward (food or drug) becomes exaggerated relative to, and at the expense of others rewards. Both drugs and food have powerful reinforcing effects, which are in part mediated by abrupt dopamine increases in the brain reward centres. The abrupt dopamine increases, in vulnerable individuals, can override the brain's homeostatic control mechanisms. These parallels have generated interest in understanding the shared vulnerabilities between addiction and obesity. Predictably, they also engendered a heated debate. Specifically, brain imaging studies are beginning to uncover common features between these two conditions and delineate some of the overlapping brain circuits whose dysfunctions may underlie the observed deficits. The combined results suggest that both obese and drug‐addicted individuals suffer from impairments in dopaminergic pathways that regulate neuronal systems associated not only with reward sensitivity and incentive motivation, but also with conditioning, self‐control, stress reactivity and interoceptive awareness. In parallel, studies are also delineating differences between them that centre on the key role that peripheral signals involved with homeostatic control exert on food intake. Here, we focus on the shared neurobiological substrates of obesity and addiction.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This review argues that obesity and drug addiction share overlapping neurobiological substrates, especially disrupted dopamine pathways involved in reward, motivation, conditioning, self-control, stress reactivity, and interoception. It proposes that compulsive food intake and drug taking arise from imbalanced processing across these circuits, while homeostatic and peripheral feeding signals remain a key difference.
Key findings
- Both obese and drug-addicted individuals show impairments in dopaminergic pathways, including lower striatal dopamine D2 receptor (D2R) availability linked to decreased activity in prefrontal regions such as OFC, ACC, and DLPFC, which the paper associates with compulsivity and impulsivity.
- Obese individuals show lower rates of nicotine and marijuana abuse than non-obese individuals, and there is an inverse relationship between BMI and recent illicit drug use; the paper suggests food and drugs may compete for overlapping reward mechanisms.
- Obese individuals exhibit less activation of reward circuits from actual food consumption than lean individuals but greater activation of somatosensory cortical regions processing palatability during anticipation; in non-obese individuals with binge eating disorder, higher dopamine release in dorsal striatum to food cues predicted binge-eating severity.
- In rats, medial habenula mu-opioid peptide binding was approximately 40% higher after palatable-food exposure in those that gained weight; a latent class analysis of 997 fourth graders linked executive function to obesity risk.
Methods
- Narrative review/position paper, not a primary study; it synthesizes human neuroimaging (PET, fMRI), preclinical rodent and non-human primate, clinical, genetic, and pharmacological evidence.
- The review focuses on shared neurobiological substrates of obesity and addiction, comparing circuits for reward/saliency, motivation/drive, conditioning, self-control, interoception, and aversion/stress reactivity.
- Main analysis is qualitative integration of cited literature; no systematic search, meta-analysis, or new data are reported.
Limitations
- Stated in the paper: D2R-BMI studies cannot address causality; one negative D2R study may have been hampered by low statistical power (n = 5/group); some inconsistencies exist among studies; the role of direct versus indirect striatal pathways in eating remains to be explored; and dopamine modulation of insular activity is poorly investigated.
- Evident from the text: this is a selective narrative review without systematic search or formal bias assessment, and it relies heavily on animal models and cross-sectional human imaging, so many cited associations are correlational.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
123 Not checked yet · 47 Own interpretation · 10 No basis given · 2 Partly supported · 1 Supported · accuracy not yet measured
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“findings of attenuated responses to drug rewards in animal models of obesity (33,34).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The role of dopamine in acute reward to drugs and food
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [33] Davis JF Tracy AL Schurdak JD Exposure to elevated levels of dietary fat attenuates psychostimulant reward and mesolimbic dopamine turnover in the rat Behav Neurosci 2008 122 1257 1263 19045945 PMC2597276 source
The Results section ('Exposure to dietary fat attenuates amphetamine conditioned place preference'; page not provided) reports that obese high-fat-fed rats did not develop a preference for the amphetamine-paired compartment, unlike chow-fed rats. The same reduced response occurred in high-fat-fed rats that were not obese, so the study does not isolate obesity as its cause. (LLM, conf=0.90)
- Partly supportedcites [34] Wellman PJ Nation JR Davis KW Impairment of acquisition of cocaine self-administration in rats maintained on a high-fat diet Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2007 88 89 93 17764729 PMC2094387 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Abstract reports diminished acquisition of cocaine self-administration in high-fat-fed rats, suggesting reduced cocaine reinforcement. It also states that the effect was not a function of diet-induced obesity. The source therefore supports an attenuated response to cocaine in high-fat-fed rats, but not the broader attribution to obesity or drug rewards generally. (LLM, conf=0.88)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“The OFC plays a role in learning stimulus-reinforcement associations and conditioning (118,119), supports conditioned-cue-elicited feeding (120) and probably contributes to overeating irrespective of hunger signals (121).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > Overlapping dysfunction in the motivation circuits
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [118] Cox SM Andrade A Johnsrude IS Learning to like: a role for human orbitofrontal cortex in conditioned reward J Neurosci 2005 25 2733 2740 15758183 PMC6725165 source
The Discussion reports OFC responses to stimuli that acquired affective value through associative conditioning and links the OFC to representing their value after conditioned-stimulus–reward pairings. This supports the attributed role in stimulus–reinforcement associations and conditioning. (LLM, conf=0.88)
- Supportedcites [119] Gallagher M McMahan RW Schoenbaum G Orbitofrontal cortex and representation of incentive value in associative learning J Neurosci 1999 19 6610 6614 10414988 PMC6782791 source
The Discussion describes OFC as important for associative information linking cues to the value of reinforcers. The Abstract reports that OFC lesions altered conditioned responding after reinforcer devaluation, while leaving initial acquisition of the conditioned response intact; this supports a role in conditioning without implying OFC is required for initial learning. (LLM, conf=0.88)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
In the paper
“Using PET to measure brain glucose metabolism in healthy controls, we reported a negative correlation between BMI and metabolic activity in DLPFC, OFC and ACC.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > Overlapping dysfunction in the motivation circuits
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [98] Volkow ND Wang GJ Telang F Inverse association between BMI and prefrontal metabolic activity in healthy adults Obesity 2009 17 60 65 18948965 PMC2681079 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In this study, the metabolic activity in prefrontal regions predicted the subjects’ performance in tests of executive function (98).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > Overlapping dysfunction in the motivation circuits
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [98] Volkow ND Wang GJ Telang F Inverse association between BMI and prefrontal metabolic activity in healthy adults Obesity 2009 17 60 65 18948965 PMC2681079 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“there is an overlap in the neuronal mechanisms implicated in the loss of control and overconsumption of food intake seen in obesity and in the compulsive intake of drugs seen in addiction.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > Background
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“they represent a critical ‘knot’ whose fragilities are bound to underlie dysfunctional responses to a broad array of inputs, including drug and food reward.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > Dopamine at the centre of brain networks mediating reactivity to environmental stimuli
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“for this dimensional analysis also encompasses non-obese individuals suffering from other eating disorders (e.g. binge eating disorder [BED] and anorexia nervosa) (9,10), which are also likely to involve imbalances in reward and self-control circuits.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > Background
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [9] Umberg EN Shader RI Hsu LK Greenblatt DJ From disordered eating to addiction: the ‘food drug’ in bulimia nervosa J Clin Psychopharmacol 2012 32 376 389 22544008 source
- Not checked yetcites [10] Speranza M Revah-Levy A Giquel L An investigation of Goodman’s addictive disorder criteria in eating disorders Eur Eat Disord Rev 2011 20 182 189 21834026 source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Drugs of abuse tap into the neuronal mechanisms that modulate the motivation to consume food”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > Background
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
In the paper
“Multidisciplinary research has linked such powerful craving to adaptations in the brain circuitry in charge of anticipating and assessing reward and learning conditioned associations that drive habits and automatic behaviours (7).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > Background
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [7] Koob GF Le Moal M Drug abuse: hedonic homeostatic dysregulation Science 1997 278 52 58 9311926 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This functional model of addiction can also be used to understand why some obese individuals find it so difficult to properly regulate their caloric intake and maintain energy homeostasis.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > Background
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“feeding behaviours are also influenced by another layer of regulation that involves processing of rewards through DA signalling and its ability to condition food-associated stimuli that then will trigger the desire for the associated food.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > Background
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Several neurotransmitters, including DA, cannabinoids, opioids, gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and serotonin, as well as hormones and neuropeptides involved in homeostatic regulation of food intake, such as insulin, orexin, leptin, ghrelin, PYY, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) have been implicated in the rewarding effects of food and drugs (Tables 1 and 2) (18–21).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The role of dopamine in acute reward to drugs and food
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Tables 1 and 2
- Not checked yetcites [18] Atkinson TJ Central and peripheral neuroendocrine peptides and signalling in appetite regulation: considerations for obesity pharmacotherapy Obes Rev 2008 9 108 120 18257752 source
- Not checked yetcites [19] Cota D Tschop MH Horvath TL Levine AS Cannabinoids, opioids and eating behavior: the molecular face of hedonism? Brain Res Rev 2006 51 85 107 16364446 source
- Not checked yetcites [20] Cason AM Smith RJ Tahsili-Fahadan P Moorman DE Sartor GC Aston-Jones G Role of orexin/hypocretin in reward-seeking and addiction: implications for obesity Physiol Behav 2010 100 419 428 20338186 PMC2886173 source
- Not checked yetcites [21] Dickson S Shirazi RH Hansson C Bergquist F Nissbrandt H Skibicka KP The glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) analogue, Exendin-4, decreases the rewarding value of food: a new role for mesolimbic GLP-1 receptors J Neurosci 2012 32 4812 4820 22492036 PMC6620919 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Drug addiction and obesity appear to share several properties.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > Abstract
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Central to these two pathologies is the disruption of brain dopamine (DA) pathways”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > Background
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“with repeated access to highly palatable food, some individuals (both humans as well as laboratory animals) may eventually override the inhibitory processes that signal satiety and begin to compulsively consume large amounts of food despite nutrition overload”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > Background
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“self-control and compulsive intake (whether of food or drugs) occurs in a dimensional continuum, strongly influenced by the context”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > Background
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“new genetic, pharmacological and neuroimaging evidence showing direct influences of certain peptide hormones (e.g. peptide YY [PYY], ghrelin and leptin) on DA-modulated regions including those involved in reward (VTA, NAc and ventral pallidum), self-control (prefrontal cortices), interoception (cingulate, insula), emotions (amygdala), habits and routines (dorsal striatum) and learning memory (hipp”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > Background
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [11] Schloegl H Percik R Horstmann A Villringer A Stumvoll M Peptide hormones regulating appetite -focus on neuroimaging studies in humans Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2011 27 104 112 21294236 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The combined results suggest that both obese and drug-addicted individuals suffer from impairments in dopaminergic pathways that regulate neuronal systems associated not only with reward sensitivity and incentive motivation, but also with conditioning, self-control, stress reactivity and interoceptive awareness.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > Abstract
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Research is uncovering a high level of communication between these two regulatory processes, such that the line between the homeostatic and the hedonic control of feeding behaviours is becoming increasingly blurred (Tables 1 and 2).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > Background
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Tables 1 and 2
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The abrupt dopamine increases, in vulnerable individuals, can override the brain’s homeostatic control mechanisms.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Most of the differences between addiction and obesity pathophysiologies arise from dysfunctions at this level of regulation, namely, energy homeostasis.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > Background
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Both drugs and food have powerful reinforcing effects, which are in part mediated by abrupt dopamine increases in the brain reward centres.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“drugs (and other behavioural patterns, including disordered eating) as part of a vast and heterogeneous family of ‘triggers’, with the ability to expose, under the suitable (environmental) circumstances, an underlying (biological) vulnerability.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > Background
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Dopamine’s role in reinforcement is more complex than just coding for hedonic pleasure.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The transition to compulsive consumption
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“projections from the amygdala and the OFC to DA neurons and to NAc are involved in conditioned responses to food (53) and drugs (54,55).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The transition to compulsive consumption
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [53] Petrovich GD Forebrain circuits and control of feeding by learned cues Neurobiol Learn Mem 2010 95 152 158 20965265 source
- Not checked yetcites [54] Lasseter HC Wells AM Xie X Fuchs RA Interaction of the basolateral amygdala and orbitofrontal cortex is critical for drug context-induced reinstatement of cocaine-seeking behavior in rats Neuropsychopharmacology 2011 36 711 720 21124303 PMC3020992 source
- Not checked yetcites [55] See RE Neural substrates of cocaine-cue associations that trigger relapse Eur J Pharmacol 2005 526 140 146 16253228 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“an increasing number of studies are reporting that these hormone/ peptides can modulate the rewarding effects of drugs of abuse (Table 1)”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The role of dopamine in acute reward to drugs and food
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Table 1
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Experiments in rodents have shown that, upon first exposure to a food reward, the firing of DA neurons in the VTA increases with a resulting increase in DA release in NAc (22).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The role of dopamine in acute reward to drugs and food
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [22] Norgren R Hajnal A Mungarndee SS Gustatory reward and the nucleus accumbens Physiol Behav 2006 89 531 535 16822531 PMC3114426 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“food-induced increases in striatal DA alone cannot explain the difference between normal food intake and excessive compulsive food consumption since these responses are present in healthy individuals who do not eat excessively.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The role of dopamine in acute reward to drugs and food
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“food stimuli activate brain regions that are part of the reward circuitry of the brain (45).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The role of dopamine in acute reward to drugs and food
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [45] Volkow ND Wang GJ Fowler JS Telang F Overlapping neuronal circuits in addiction and obesity: evidence of systems pathology Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2008 363 3191 3200 18640912 PMC2607335 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This transition is consistent with an initial involvement of the VTA and increasing involvement of SN and its associated dorso-striatalcortical network, with consolidated responses and routines.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The transition to compulsive consumption
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“neutral stimuli that are linked to the reinforcer (whether a natural or a drug reinforcer) acquire the ability by themselves to increase DA in striatum (including NAc) in anticipation of the reward, thus engendering a strong motivation to perform and sustain the behaviours necessary to seek the drug or to seek the food (48).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The transition to compulsive consumption
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [48] Owesson-White CA Ariansen J Stuber GD Neural encoding of cocaine-seeking behavior is coincident with phasic dopamine release in the accumbens core and shell Eur J Neurosci 2009 30 1117 1127 19735286 PMC3107700 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Taken together, these results strongly suggest the possibility that food and drugs may be competing for overlapping reward mechanisms.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The role of dopamine in acute reward to drugs and food
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“in healthy, normal-weight human subjects, ingestion of palatable food releases DA in the striatum in proportion to the ratings of meal pleasantness (44)”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The role of dopamine in acute reward to drugs and food
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [44] Small DM Jones-Gotman M Dagher A Feeding-induced dopamine release in dorsal striatum correlates with meal pleasantness ratings in healthy human volunteers Neuroimage 2003 19 1709 1715 12948725 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“glutamatergic projections to the hypothalamus are involved in the neuroplastic changes that follow fasting and that facilitate feeding (52).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The transition to compulsive consumption
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [52] Liu T Kong D Shah BP Fasting activation of AgRP neurons requires NMDA receptors and involves spinogenesis and increased excitatory tone Neuron 2012 73 511 522 22325203 PMC3278709 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“neurons in the VTA and/or NAc express GLP-1 (24,25), ghrelin (26,27), leptin (28,29), insulin (30), orexin (31) and melanocortin receptors (32).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The role of dopamine in acute reward to drugs and food
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [24] Alhadeff AL Rupprecht LE Hayes MR GLP-1 neurons in the nucleus of the solitary tract project directly to the ventral tegmental area and nucleus accumbens to control for food intake Endocrinology 2012 153 647 658 22128031 PMC3275387 source
- Not checked yetcites [25] Rinaman L Ascending projections from the caudal visceral nucleus of the solitary tract to brain regions involved in food intake and energy expenditure Brain Res 2010 1350 18 34 20353764 PMC2909454 source
- Not checked yetcites [26] Abizaid A Liu ZW Andrews ZB Ghrelin modulates the activity and synaptic input organization of midbrain dopamine neurons while promoting appetite J Clin Invest 2006 116 3229 3239 17060947 PMC1618869 source
- Not checked yetcites [27] Jerlhag E Egecioglu E Dickson SL Douhan A Svensson L Engel JA Ghrelin administration into tegmental areas stimulates locomotor activity and increases extracellular concentration of dopamine in the nucleus accumbens Addict Biol 2007 12 6 16 17407492 source
- Not checked yetcites [28] Figlewicz D Evans SB Murphy J Hoen M Myers M Baskin DG Expression of receptors for insulin and leptin in the ventral tegmental area/substantia nigra (VTA/SN) of the rat Brain Res 2003 964 107 115 12573518 source
- Not checked yetcites [29] Leshan R Opland DM Louis GW Ventral tegmental area leptin receptor neurons specifically project to and regulate cocaine- and amphetamine-regulated transcript neurons of the extended central amygdala J Neurosci 2010 30 5713 5723 20410123 PMC2864009 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The extensive glutamatergic afferents to DA neurons from regions involved in the processing of sensory (insula or primary gustatory cortex), homeostatic (hypothalamus), reward (NAc and ventral pallidum), emotional (amygdala and hippocampus) and multimodal (orbitofrontal cortex [OFC] for salience attribution) information, modulate their activity in response to rewards and to conditioned cues (51).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The transition to compulsive consumption
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [51] Geisler S Wise RA Functional implications of glutamatergic projections to the ventral tegmental area Rev Neurosci 2008 19 227 244 19145985 PMC2735573 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“there is also evidence of a gradual shift in DA increases from NAc to dorsal striatum, which occurs for both, food and drugs.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The transition to compulsive consumption
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“juxtaposed interventions that decrease BMI and reduce plasma levels of insulin and leptin enhance the sensitivity to psychostimulant drugs (39).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The role of dopamine in acute reward to drugs and food
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [39] Davis JF Choi DL Benoit SC Insulin, leptin and reward Trends Endocrinol Metab 2010 21 68 74 19818643 PMC2822063 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“once extinguished, drug-reinforced behaviours are far more susceptible to stress-induced reinstatement than food-reinforced behaviours (58).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The transition to compulsive consumption
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [58] Kearns DN Gomez-Serrano MA Tunstall BJ A review of preclinical research demonstrating that drug and non-drug rein-forcers differentially affect behavior Curr Drug Abuse Rev 2011 4 261 269 21999697 PMC3717264 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Positron emission tomography (PET) studies have uncovered significant reductions in dopamine 2 receptor (D2R) availability in the striatum of addicted subjects that persist for months after protracted detoxification (reviewed in (64)).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The impact of dysfunction in self-control
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [64] Volkow ND Fowler JS Wang GJ Baler R Telang F Imaging dopamine’s role in drug abuse and addiction Neuropharmacology 2009 56 Suppl. 1 3 8 18617195 PMC2696819 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In humans addicted to drugs, the reduction in striatal D2R is associated with decreased activity of prefrontal regions, OFC, anterior cingulate gyrus (ACC) and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) (67,74,75).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The impact of dysfunction in self-control
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [67] Volkow ND Chang L Wang GJ Low level of brain dopamine D2 receptors in methamphetamine abusers: association with metabolism in the orbitofrontal cortex Am J Psychiatry 2001 158 2015 2021 11729018 source
- Not checked yetcites [74] Volkow ND Fowler JS Wang GJ Decreased dopamine D2 receptor availability is associated with reduced frontal metabolism in cocaine abusers Synapse 1993 14 169 177 8101394 source
- Not checked yetcites [75] Volkow ND Wang GJ Telang F Profound decreases in dopamine release in striatum in detoxified alcoholics: possible orbitofrontal involvement J Neurosci 2007 27 12700 12706 18003850 PMC6673312 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“it has been postulated that their improper regulation by D2R-mediated DA signalling in addicted subjects could underlie the enhanced motivational value of drugs in their behaviour and the loss of control over drug intake (62).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The impact of dysfunction in self-control
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [62] Volkow ND Fowler JS Addiction, a disease of compulsion and drive: involvement of the orbitofrontal cortex Cereb Cortex 2000 10 318 325 10731226 source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“A similar inhibition of the metabolic activity in the OFC (and also in NAc) has been observed in cocaine abusers when they were asked to inhibit their drug craving upon exposure to cocaine cues (57).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The transition to compulsive consumption
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [57] Volkow ND Fowler JS Wang GJ Cognitive control of drug craving inhibits brain reward regions in cocaine abusers Neuroimage 2009 49 2536 2543 19913102 PMC2818484 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the difference appears to be one of degree rather than principle.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The transition to compulsive consumption
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“a study performed in subjects who, despite having a high risk for alcoholism (positive family history of alcoholism) were not alcoholics, revealed a higher than normal striatal D2R availability that was associated with normal metabolism in OFC, ACC and DLPFC (77).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The impact of dysfunction in self-control
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [77] Volkow ND Wang GJ Begleiter H High levels of dopamine D2 receptors in unaffected members of alcoholic families: possible protective factors Arch Gen Psychiatry 2006 63 999 1008 16953002 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“the capacity to inhibit prepotent responses and exert self-control is bound to contribute to an individual’s ability to avoid engaging in excessive behaviours, such as taking drugs or eating past the point of satiety, and thus increasing his/her vulnerability to addiction (or obesity) (62,63).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The impact of dysfunction in self-control
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [62] Volkow ND Fowler JS Addiction, a disease of compulsion and drive: involvement of the orbitofrontal cortex Cereb Cortex 2000 10 318 325 10731226 source
- Not checked yetcites [63] Volkow ND Wang GJ Telang F Low dopamine striatal D2 receptors are associated with prefrontal metabolism in obese subjects: possible contributing factors Neuroimage 2008 42 1537 1543 18598772 PMC2659013 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Evidence of dysregulated D2R striatal signalling has also been detected among obese individuals.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The impact of dysfunction in self-control
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“preclinical studies in rodent and non-human primates have shown that repeated drug exposures are associated with reductions in striatal D2R levels and in D2R signalling (65–67).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The impact of dysfunction in self-control
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [65] Thanos PK Michaelides M Benveniste H Wang GJ Volkow ND Effects of chronic oral methylphenidate on cocaine self-administration and striatal dopamine D2 receptors in rodents Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2007 87 426 433 17599397 source
- Not checked yetcites [66] Nader MA Morgan D Gage HD PET imaging of dopamine D2 receptors during chronic cocaine self-administration in monkeys Nat Neurosci 2006 9 1050 1056 16829955 source
- Not checked yetcites [67] Volkow ND Chang L Wang GJ Low level of brain dopamine D2 receptors in methamphetamine abusers: association with metabolism in the orbitofrontal cortex Am J Psychiatry 2001 158 2015 2021 11729018 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“when compared to food cues, drug cues are more powerful triggers of reinforcer-seeking behaviour following a period of abstinence, at least in the case of animals that have not been food deprived (58).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The transition to compulsive consumption
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [58] Kearns DN Gomez-Serrano MA Tunstall BJ A review of preclinical research demonstrating that drug and non-drug rein-forcers differentially affect behavior Curr Drug Abuse Rev 2011 4 261 269 21999697 PMC3717264 source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“This blunted response to food consumption in the reward circuitry of obese individuals is reminiscent of the reduced DA increases triggered by drug consumption in addicted individuals when compared to non-addicted subjects (94).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The impact of dysfunction in self-control
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [94] Volkow ND Wang GJ Fowler JS Decreased striatal dopaminergic responsiveness in detoxified cocaine-dependent subjects Nature 1997 386 830 833 9126741 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“However, studies performed with obese individuals have begun to uncover evidence of a preference for high, immediate rewards, despite an increased chance of suffering higher future losses (100,101).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The impact of dysfunction in self-control
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [100] Brogan A Hevey D Pignatti R Anorexia, bulimia, and obesity: shared decision making deficits on the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2010 16 711 715 20406532 source
- Not checked yetcites [101] Weller RE Cook EW3rd Avsar KB Cox JE Obese women show greater delay discounting than healthy-weight women Appetite 2008 51 563 569 18513828 source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Dopaminergic signalling also modulates motivation.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > Overlapping dysfunction in the motivation circuits
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [108] Salamone JD Correa M Farrar A Mingote SM Effort-related functions of nucleus accumbens dopamine and associated forebrain circuits Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2007 191 461 482 17225164 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Interestingly, delay discounting seems to depend on the function of the ventral striatum (104) and of the PFC, including OFC (105) and its connections to the NAc (106), and is sensitive to DA manipulations (107).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The impact of dysfunction in self-control
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [104] Gregorios-Pippas L Tobler PN Schultz W Short-term temporal discounting of reward value in human ventral striatum J Neurophysiol 2009 101 1507 1523 19164109 PMC2666398 source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“the one study that failed to detect a statistically significant reduction in striatal D2R between obese individuals and non-obese controls (83), may have been hampered by its low statistical power (n = 5/group).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The impact of dysfunction in self-control
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [83] Steele KE Prokopowicz GP Schweitzer MA Alterations of central dopamine receptors before and after gastric bypass surgery Obes Surg 2010 20 369 374 19902317 source
hedgedconditionaln = 5- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Interestingly, delay discounting seems to depend on the function of the ventral striatum (104) and of the PFC, including OFC (105) and its connections to the NAc (106), and is sensitive to DA manipulations (107).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The impact of dysfunction in self-control
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [105] Bjork JM Momenan R Hommer DW Delay discounting correlates with proportional lateral frontal cortex volumes Biol Psychiatry 2009 65 710 713 19121516 source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“compared with normal-weight individuals, obese individuals who were presented with pictures of high-calorie food (stimuli to which they are conditioned) showed increased neural activation in regions that are part of reward and motivation circuits (NAc, dorsal striatum, OFC, ACC, amygdala, hippocampus and insula) (90).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The impact of dysfunction in self-control
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [90] Killgore WD Yurgelun-Todd DA Body mass predicts orbitofrontal activity during visual presentations of high-calorie foods Neuroreport 2005 16 859 863 15891585 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Behavioural traits such as vigor, persistence and investing a continued effort towards achieving a goal, are all subject to modulation by DA acting through several target regions, including NAc, ACC, OFC, DLPFC, amygdala, dorsal striatum and ventral pallidum (108).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > Overlapping dysfunction in the motivation circuits
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [108] Salamone JD Correa M Farrar A Mingote SM Effort-related functions of nucleus accumbens dopamine and associated forebrain circuits Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2007 191 461 482 17225164 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The hypothesis of compensatory overeating is consistent with preclinical evidence showing that decreased DA activity in VTA results in a dramatic increase in the consumption of high-fat foods (89).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The impact of dysfunction in self-control
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [89] Stoeckel LE Weller RE Cook EW3rd Twieg DB Knowlton RC Cox JE Widespread reward-system activation in obese women in response to pictures of high-calorie foods Neuroimage 2008 41 636 647 18413289 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Delay discounting has been most exhaustively investigated in drug abusers who exhibit an exaggerated preference of small-but-immediate over large-but-delayed rewards (99).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The impact of dysfunction in self-control
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [99] Bickel WK Miller ML Yi R Kowal BP Lindquist DM Pitcock JA Behavioral and neuroeconomics of drug addiction: competing neural systems and temporal discounting processes Drug Alcohol Depend 2007 90 Suppl. 1 S85 S91 17101239 PMC2033431 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Interestingly, delay discounting seems to depend on the function of the ventral striatum (104) and of the PFC, including OFC (105) and its connections to the NAc (106), and is sensitive to DA manipulations (107).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The impact of dysfunction in self-control
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [106] Bezzina G Body S Cheung TH Effect of disconnecting the orbital prefrontal cortex from the nucleus accumbens core on inter-temporal choice behaviour: a quantitative analysis Behav Brain Res 2008 191 272 279 18472170 PMC2424131 source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“in normal-weight controls, the activation of the ACC and OFC (regions involved in salience attribution that project into the NAc) during presentation of high-calorie food was found to be negatively correlated with their BMI (91).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The impact of dysfunction in self-control
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [91] Stice E Spoor S Bohon C Veldhuizen MG Small DM Relation of reward from food intake and anticipated food intake to obesity: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study J Abnorm Psychol 2008 117 924 935 19025237 PMC2681092 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“A recent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study of executive function in obese women, for example, identified regional differences in brain activation during delayed discounting tasks that were predictive of future weight gain (102).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The impact of dysfunction in self-control
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [102] Kishinevsky FI Cox JE Murdaugh DL Stoeckel LE Cook EW3rd Weller RE fMRI reactivity on a delay discounting task predicts weight gain in obese women Appetite 2012 58 582 592 22166676 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“it is also possible that some eating disorders may actually result from hypersensitivity to conditioned food cues.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The impact of dysfunction in self-control
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Yet, another study found a positive correlation between BMI and hyperbolic discounting, whereby future negative payoffs are discounted less than future positive payoffs (103).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The impact of dysfunction in self-control
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [103] Ikeda S Kang MI Ohtake F Hyperbolic discounting, the sign effect, and the body mass index J Health Econ 2010 29 268 284 20167384 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Interestingly, delay discounting seems to depend on the function of the ventral striatum (104) and of the PFC, including OFC (105) and its connections to the NAc (106), and is sensitive to DA manipulations (107).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The impact of dysfunction in self-control
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [107] Pine A Shiner T Seymour B Dolan RJ Dopamine, time, and impulsivity in humans J Neurosci 2010 30 8888 8896 20592211 PMC3059485 source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In addition, a study that prompted cocaine-addicted subjects to purposefully inhibit craving when exposed to drug cues showed that those subjects who were successful at inhibiting craving displayed decreased metabolism in medial OFC (which processes the motivational value of a reinforcer) and NAc (which predicts reward) (57).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > Overlapping dysfunction in the motivation circuits
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [57] Volkow ND Fowler JS Wang GJ Cognitive control of drug craving inhibits brain reward regions in cocaine abusers Neuroimage 2009 49 2536 2543 19913102 PMC2818484 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Another study found no differences in grey matter volumes between obese and lean subjects; however, it did record a positive correlation between white matter volume in basal brain structures and waist to hip ratios, a trend that was partially reversed by dieting (129).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > Overlapping dysfunction in the motivation circuits
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [129] Haltia LT Viljanen A Parkkola R Brain white matter expansion in human obesity and the recovering effect of dieting J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2007 92 3278 3284 17536002 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Dysregulated DA signalling is associated with enhanced motivation to procure drugs, a hallmark of addiction, which is why drug-addicted individuals often engage in extreme behaviours to obtain drugs, even when they entail known severe and adverse consequences and may require sustained and complex behaviours to obtain them (109).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > Overlapping dysfunction in the motivation circuits
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [109] Volkow N Li TK The neuroscience of addiction Nat Neurosci 2005 8 1429 1430 16251981 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Interestingly, albeit predictably, a cross-sectional investigation of children’s ability to self-regulate, solve problems and engage in goal-directed health behaviours reveals executive function proficiency to be negatively correlated not only with substance use but also with the consumption of high-calorie snack foods, and with sedentary behaviours (125).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > Overlapping dysfunction in the motivation circuits
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [125] Riggs NR Spruijt-Metz D Chou CP Pentz MA Relationships between executive cognitive function and lifetime substance use and obesity-related behaviors in fourth grade youth Child Neuropsychol 2012 18 1 11 21480013 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Because drug taking becomes the main motivational drive in drug addiction (110), addicted subjects are aroused and motivated by the process of obtaining the drug but tend to become withdrawn and apathetic when exposed to non–drug-related activities.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > Overlapping dysfunction in the motivation circuits
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [110] Volkow ND Fowler JS Wang GJ The addicted human brain: insights from imaging studies J Clin Invest 2003 111 1444 1451 12750391 PMC155054 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These findings further corroborate the involvement of OFC, ACC and striatum in the enhanced motivation to procure the drug seen in addiction.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > Overlapping dysfunction in the motivation circuits
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The OFC plays a role in learning stimulus-reinforcement associations and conditioning (118,119), supports conditioned-cue-elicited feeding (120) and probably contributes to overeating irrespective of hunger signals (121).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > Overlapping dysfunction in the motivation circuits
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [121] Ogden J Wardle J Cognitive restraint and sensitivity to cues for hunger and satiety Physiol Behav 1990 47 477 481 2359756 source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In contrast to the decreases in prefrontal activity reported in detoxified cocaine abusers when not stimulated with drug or drug cues (see review (64)), these prefrontal regions become activated when cocaine abusers are exposed to craving-inducing stimuli (either drugs or cues) (111–113).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > Overlapping dysfunction in the motivation circuits
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [64] Volkow ND Fowler JS Wang GJ Baler R Telang F Imaging dopamine’s role in drug abuse and addiction Neuropharmacology 2009 56 Suppl. 1 3 8 18617195 PMC2696819 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In contrast to the decreases in prefrontal activity reported in detoxified cocaine abusers when not stimulated with drug or drug cues (see review (64)), these prefrontal regions become activated when cocaine abusers are exposed to craving-inducing stimuli (either drugs or cues) (111–113).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > Overlapping dysfunction in the motivation circuits
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [111] Volkow ND Wang GJ Fowler JS Association of methylphenidate-induced craving with changes in right striatoorbitofrontal metabolism in cocaine abusers: implications in addiction Am J Psychiatry 1999 156 19 26 9892293 source
- Not checked yetcites [112] Wang GJ Volkow ND Fowler JS Regional brain metabolic activation during craving elicited by recall of previous drug experiences Life Sci 1999 64 775 784 10075110 source
- Not checked yetcites [113] Grant S London ED Newlin DB Activation of memory circuits during cue-elicited cocaine craving Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1996 93 12040 12045 8876259 PMC38179 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Another study found no differences in grey matter volumes between obese and lean subjects; however, it did record a positive correlation between white matter volume in basal brain structures and waist to hip ratios, a trend that was partially reversed by dieting (129).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > Overlapping dysfunction in the motivation circuits
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [129] Haltia LT Viljanen A Parkkola R Brain white matter expansion in human obesity and the recovering effect of dieting J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2007 92 3278 3284 17536002 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The OFC is also involved in attributing salience value to food (115,116), helping to assess its expected pleasantness and palatability as a function of its context.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > Overlapping dysfunction in the motivation circuits
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [115] Rolls ET McCabe C Enhanced affective brain representations of chocolate in cravers vs. non-cravers Eur J Neurosci 2007 26 1067 1076 17714197 source
- Not checked yetcites [116] Grabenhorst F Rolls ET Bilderbeck A How cognition modulates affective responses to taste and flavor: top-down influences on the orbitofrontal and pregenual cingulate cortices Cereb Cortex 2008 18 1549 1559 18056086 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Brain imaging studies comparing obese and lean individuals have also reported lower grey matter density in frontal regions (frontal operculum and middle frontal gyrus) and in post-central gyrus and putamen (128).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > Overlapping dysfunction in the motivation circuits
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [128] Pannacciulli N Del Parigi A Chen K Le DS Reiman EM Tataranni PA Brain abnormalities in human obesity: a voxel-based morphometric study Neuroimage 2006 31 1419 1425 16545583 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Clearly, some of the individual differences in executive function can constitute a prodromal risk for later obesity in some individuals, as revealed by a recent latent class analysis of 997 fourth graders in a school-based obesity prevention program (124).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > Overlapping dysfunction in the motivation circuits
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [124] Riggs NR Huh J Chou CP Spruijt-Metz D Pentz MA Executive function and latent classes of childhood obesity risk J Behav Med 2012 in press 22218938 source
boostedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Interestingly, cortical areas, like the DPFC and OFC that are involved in inhibitory control, have also been found to become activated in successful dieters in response to meal consumption (130), suggesting a potential target for behavioural retraining in the treatment of obesity (and also in addiction).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > Overlapping dysfunction in the motivation circuits
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [130] DelParigi A Chen K Salbe AD Successful dieters have increased neural activity in cortical areas involved in the control of behavior Int J Obes (Lond) 2007 31 440 448 16819526 source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In spite of some inconsistencies among studies, brain imaging data also support the notion that structural and functional changes in brain regions implicated in executive function (including inhibitory control) may be associated with high BMI in otherwise healthy individuals.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > Overlapping dysfunction in the motivation circuits
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Brain activation or metabolism differences observed in obese versus lean individuals reflect dysfunction in the underlying circuits rather than consequences of obesity.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Neuroimaging studies have revealed that the middle insula plays a critical role in cravings for food, cocaine and cigarettes (131–133).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The involvement of interoceptive circuitry
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [131] Bonson KR Grant SJ Contoreggi CS Neural systems and cue-induced cocaine craving Neuropsychopharmacology 2002 26 376 386 11850152 source
- Not checked yetcites [132] Pelchat ML Johnson A Chan R Valdez J Ragland JD Images of desire: food-craving activation during fMRI Neuroimage 2004 23 1486 1493 15589112 source
- Not checked yetcites [133] Wang Z Faith M Patterson F Neural substrates of abstinence-induced cigarette cravings in chronic smokers J Neurosci 2007 27 14035 14040 18094242 PMC2153440 source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The OFC plays a role in learning stimulus-reinforcement associations and conditioning (118,119), supports conditioned-cue-elicited feeding (120) and probably contributes to overeating irrespective of hunger signals (121).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > Overlapping dysfunction in the motivation circuits
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [120] Weingarten HP Conditioned cues elicit feeding in sated rats: a role for learning in meal initiation Science 1983 220 431 433 6836286 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Similarly, a nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopic study in healthy middle age and elderly controls showed that BMI was negatively associated with the levels of N-acetyl-aspartate (a marker of neuronal integrity) in frontal cortex and ACC (98,127).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > Overlapping dysfunction in the motivation circuits
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [98] Volkow ND Wang GJ Telang F Inverse association between BMI and prefrontal metabolic activity in healthy adults Obesity 2009 17 60 65 18948965 PMC2681079 source
- Not checked yetcites [127] Gazdzinski S Kornak J Weiner MW Meyerhoff DJ Body mass index and magnetic resonance markers of brain integrity in adults Ann Neurol 2008 63 652 657 18409192 PMC2542059 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Interestingly, cortical areas, like the DPFC and OFC that are involved in inhibitory control, have also been found to become activated in successful dieters in response to meal consumption (130), suggesting a potential target for behavioural retraining in the treatment of obesity (and also in addiction).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > Overlapping dysfunction in the motivation circuits
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Dysregulated DA signalling is associated with enhanced motivation to procure drugs, a hallmark of addiction, which is why drug-addicted individuals often engage in extreme behaviours to obtain drugs, even when they entail known severe and adverse consequences and may require sustained and complex behaviours to obtain them (109).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > Overlapping dysfunction in the motivation circuits
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [109] Volkow N Li TK The neuroscience of addiction Nat Neurosci 2005 8 1429 1430 16251981 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Indeed, damage to the OFC can result in hyperphagia (122,123).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > Overlapping dysfunction in the motivation circuits
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [122] Machado CJ Bachevalier J The effects of selective amygdala, orbital frontal cortex or hippocampal formation lesions on reward assessment in nonhuman primates Eur J Neurosci 2007 25 2885 2904 17561849 source
- Not checked yetcites [123] Maayan L Hoogendoorn C Sweat V Convit A Disinhibited eating in obese adolescents is associated with orbitofrontal volume reductions and executive dysfunction Obesity (Silver Spring) 2011 19 1382 1387 21350433 PMC3124611 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In the case of nicotine, a5 nicotinic receptors in the habenula appear to modulate the aversive responses to large doses of nicotine (155), and a5 and a2 receptors to modulate nicotine withdrawal (156).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The circuitry of aversion and stress reactivity
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [155] Fowler CD Lu Q Johnson PM Marks MJ Kenny PJ Habenular alpha5 nicotinic receptor subunit signalling controls nicotine intake Nature 2011 471 597 601 21278726 PMC3079537 source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, an enhanced sensitivity of the habenula, as a result of chronic drug exposures, could underlie a greater reactivity to drug cues when not followed by consumption of the drug or when the drug effects do not fulfil the expected reward outcome.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The circuitry of aversion and stress reactivity
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The habenula appears to play a similar role with regards to food reward.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The circuitry of aversion and stress reactivity
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Findings from animal models of cocaine addiction and palatable-food-induced obesity can be generalized to human addiction and obesity.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The ability to resist the urge to use a drug or eat past the point of satiety requires the proper functioning of neuronal circuits involved in top-down control to oppose the conditioned responses that trigger the desire to ingest the food/ drug.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > In closing
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“And indeed, gastric distension results in activation of the posterior insula, consistent with its role in the awareness of body states (in this case of fullness) (140).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The involvement of interoceptive circuitry
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [140] Wang GJ Tomasi D Backus W Gastric distention activates satiety circuitry in the human brain Neuroimage 2008 39 1824 1831 18155924 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In the case of nicotine, a5 nicotinic receptors in the habenula appear to modulate the aversive responses to large doses of nicotine (155), and a5 and a2 receptors to modulate nicotine withdrawal (156).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The circuitry of aversion and stress reactivity
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [156] Salas R Sturm R Boulter J De Biasi M Nicotinic receptors in the habenulointerpeduncular system are necessary for nicotine withdrawal in mice J Neurosci 2009 29 3014 3018 19279237 PMC3862238 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Cumulative evidence (148–151) points to the habenula as one of the regions that controls the decreases in firing of dopaminergic cells in VTA that may follow the failure to receive an expected reward (152).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The circuitry of aversion and stress reactivity
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [148] Matsumoto M Hikosaka O Lateral habenula as a source of negative reward signals in dopamine neurons Nature 2007 447 1111 1115 17522629 source
- Not checked yetcites [149] Christoph GR Leonzio RJ Wilcox KS Stimulation of the lateral habenula inhibits dopamine-containing neurons in the sub-stantia nigra and ventral tegmental area of the rat J Neurosci 1986 6 613 619 3958786 PMC6568453 source
- Not checked yetcites [150] Lisoprawski A Herve D Blanc G Glowinski J Tassin JP Selective activation of the mesocortico-frontal dopaminergic neurons induced by lesion of the habenula in the rat Brain Res 1980 183 229 234 7357405 source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This suggests that the habenula may be involved in over-eating when palatable food is available.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The circuitry of aversion and stress reactivity
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Findings from animal models of cocaine addiction and palatable-food-induced obesity can be generalized to human addiction and obesity.
In the paper
“Obese subjects exhibit greater insular activation than normal controls when tasting a liquid meal that consists of sugar and fat (143).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The involvement of interoceptive circuitry
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [143] DelParigi A Chen K Salbe AD Reiman EM Tataranni PA Sensory experience of food and obesity: a positron emission tomography study of the brain regions affected by tasting a liquid meal after a prolonged fast Neuroimage 2005 24 436 443 15627585 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The importance of the insula has been highlighted by a study that reported that smokers with damage to this region (but not smokers who had suffered extra-insular lesions) were able to stop smoking easily and without experiencing either cravings or relapse (134).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The involvement of interoceptive circuitry
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [134] Naqvi NH Rudrauf D Damasio H Bechara A Damage to the insula disrupts addiction to cigarette smoking Science 2007 315 531 534 17255515 PMC3698854 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Indeed, activation of the habenula, in animal models of cocaine addiction, has been associated with relapse to drug taking upon cue exposure (153,154).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The circuitry of aversion and stress reactivity
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [153] Zhang F Zhou W Liu H Increased c-Fos expression in the medial part of the lateral habenula during cue-evoked heroin-seeking in rats Neurosci Lett 2005 386 133 137 16002220 source
- Not checked yetcites [154] Brown RM Short JL Lawrence AJ Identification of brain nuclei implicated in cocaine-primed reinstatement of conditioned place preference: a behaviour dissociable from sensitization Plos ONE 2011 5 e15889 21209913 PMC3012115 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Consistent with this hypothesis, many imaging studies show differential activation of the insula during craving (135).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The involvement of interoceptive circuitry
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [135] Naqvi NH Bechara A The hidden island of addiction: the insula Trends Neurosci 2009 32 56 67 18986715 PMC3698860 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Because of the insula’s involvement in the interoceptive sense of the body, in emotional awareness (139) and in motivation and emotion (138), a contribution of insular impairment in obesity should not be surprising.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The involvement of interoceptive circuitry
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In addition, the rostral insula (connected to primary taste cortex) provides information to the OFC that influences its multimodal representation of the pleasantness or reward value of incoming food (138).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The involvement of interoceptive circuitry
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [138] Rolls ET Functions of the orbitofrontal and pregenual cingulate cortex in taste, olfaction, appetite and emotion Acta Physiol Hung 2008 95 131 164 18642756 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Indeed, brain lesion studies suggest that the ventromedial PFC and insula are necessary components of the distributed circuits that support emotional decision-making (136).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The involvement of interoceptive circuitry
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [136] Clark L Bechara A Damasio H Aitken MR Sahakian BJ Robbins TW Differential effects of insular and ventromedial pre-frontal cortex lesions on risky decision-making Brain 2008 131 1311 1322 18390562 PMC2367692 source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The lack of amygdalar response in obese subjects could reflect a blunted interoceptive awareness of bodily states linked with satiety (full stomach).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The involvement of interoceptive circuitry
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These findings are consistent with a role for the habenula (both medial and lateral) in mediating responses to aversive stimuli or to states of deprivation such as during dieting or drug withdrawal.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The circuitry of aversion and stress reactivity
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Findings from animal models of cocaine addiction and palatable-food-induced obesity can be generalized to human addiction and obesity.
In the paper
“The insula, particularly its more anterior regions, is reciprocally connected to several limbic regions (e.g. ventromedial prefrontal cortex, amygdala, and ventral striatum) and appears to have an interoceptive function, integrating the autonomic and visceral information with emotion and motivation, thus providing conscious awareness of these urges (135).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The involvement of interoceptive circuitry
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [135] Naqvi NH Bechara A The hidden island of addiction: the insula Trends Neurosci 2009 32 56 67 18986715 PMC3698860 source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“On the other hand, and consistent with this logic, it has been observed that dopaminergic cells will fire less than normal if the expected reward fails to materialize (147).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The circuitry of aversion and stress reactivity
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [147] Schultz W Dayan P Montague PR A neural substrate of prediction and reward Science 1997 275 1593 1599 9054347 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“DA signalling may also be necessary for sensing the calorie content of food.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The involvement of interoceptive circuitry
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The involvement of the habenula as an antireward hub within emotional networks is consistent with prior theoretical models of addiction that postulated that sensitized stress reactivity and negative mood (mediated through enhanced sensitivity of the amygdala and increased signalling although the corticotrophin-releasing factor) drives drug intake in addiction (159).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The circuitry of aversion and stress reactivity
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [159] Koob GF Le Moal M Addiction and the brain antireward system Annu Rev Psychol 2008 59 29 53 18154498 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Furthermore, a recent fMRI study that compared brain responses to repeated presentations of appetizing and bland food pictures in morbidly obese vs. non-obese individuals (146) found functional changes in the responsiveness and interconnectivity among key regions of the reward circuit that might help explain the oversensitivity to food cues in obese individuals.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The involvement of interoceptive circuitry
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [146] Nummenmaa L Hirvonen J Hannukainen JC Dorsal striatum and its limbic connectivity mediate abnormal anticipatory reward processing in obesity Plos ONE 2012 7 e31089 22319604 PMC3272045 source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Interestingly, the medial habenula showed significantly higher m-opioid peptide binding (by approximately 40%) after exposure to the palatable food in the rats that gained weight (those that consumed more food) but not in those that did not (157).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The circuitry of aversion and stress reactivity
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [157] Smith SL Harrold JA Williams G Diet-induced obesity increases mu opioid receptor binding in specific regions of the rat brain Brain Res 2002 953 215 222 12384255 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Human imaging studies have shown that tasting palatable foods activated the insula and midbrain areas (143,144).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The involvement of interoceptive circuitry
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [143] DelParigi A Chen K Salbe AD Reiman EM Tataranni PA Sensory experience of food and obesity: a positron emission tomography study of the brain regions affected by tasting a liquid meal after a prolonged fast Neuroimage 2005 24 436 443 15627585 source
- Not checked yetcites [144] Frank GK Oberndorfer TA Simmons AN Sucrose activates human taste pathways differently from artificial sweetener Neuroimage 2008 39 1559 1569 18096409 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Whether or not certain types of obesity should be defined as behavioural addictions (160), there are several identifiable circuits in the brain (2), whose dysfunctions uncover real and clinically meaningful parallels between the two disorders.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > In closing
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [160] Ziauddeen H Farooqi IS Fletcher PC Obesity and the brain: how convincing is the addiction model? Nat Rev Neurosci 2012 13 279 286 22414944 source
- Not checked yetcites [2] Volkow ND Wang GJ Fowler JS Tomasi D Baler R Food and drug reward: overlapping circuits in human obesity and addiction Curr Top Behav Neurosci 2011 11 1 24 22016109 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Moreover, in lean, but not in obese subjects, gastric distension resulted in activation of the amygdala and deactivation of the anterior insula (141).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The involvement of interoceptive circuitry
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [141] Tomasi D Wang GJ Wang R Association of body mass and brain activation during gastric distention: implications for obesity Plos ONE 2009 4 e6847 19718256 PMC2729391 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Even though the modulation of insular activity by DA has been poorly investigated, it is recognized that DA is involved in the responses to tasting of palatable foods that are mediated through the insula (142).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The involvement of interoceptive circuitry
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [142] Hajnal A Norgren R Taste pathways that mediate accumbens dopamine release by sapid sucrose Physiol Behav 2005 84 363 369 15763573 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The data accumulated so far suggests that it is the discrepancy between the expectation for the drug/food effects (conditioned responses) and the blunted reward experience that sustains drug taking/food overconsumption behaviour in an attempt to attain the expected reward.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > In closing
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Finally, evidence has also surfaced about the role of interoceptive and aversive circuitry in the systemic imbalances that result in the compulsive intake of either drugs or food.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > In closing
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
- It may state two separate claims as one. 60
- Probably not a substantial claim. 12
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“a recent study of siblings discordant for their addiction to stimulant drugs (78) showed brain differences in the morphology of the OFC, which were significantly smaller in the addicted sibling than in controls, whereas in the non-addicted siblings, the OFC did not differ from that of controls (79).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The impact of dysfunction in self-control
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [78] Ersche KD Jones PS Williams GB Turton AJ Robbins TW Bullmore ET Abnormal brain structure implicated in stimulant drug addiction Science 2012 335 601 604 22301321 source
- Could not verifycites [79] Parvaz MA Maloney T Moeller SJ Sensitivity to monetary reward is most severely compromised in recently abstaining cocaine addicted individuals: a cross-sectional ERP study Psychiatry Res 2012 203 75 82 22841343 PMC3444645 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Methods (section 2.1; page unavailable) describe participants with cocaine use disorders and healthy controls, not siblings discordant for addiction. The Results report ERP responses, and searches for OFC morphology and non-addicted siblings found no passage addressing the claimed anatomical comparison. (LLM, conf=0.78)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“stress is not only associated with increased consumption of palatable foods and weight gain, but acute stress also uncovers a strong correlation between BMI and a potentiated activation in response to milkshake consumption in the OFC (59)”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The transition to compulsive consumption
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [59] Rudenga KJ Sinha R Small DM Acute stress potentiates brain response to milkshake as a function of body weight and chronic stress Int J Obes (Lond) 2012 [Epub ahead of print] PMC3381866 22430303 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction reports an association of stress with palatable-food intake and weight gain. The Results (Neuroimaging) find a positive BMI–OFC relationship during stress-related milkshake consumption, but call the correlation “small but significant,” not strong. The study also tested overweight women, a qualification absent from the claim. (LLM, conf=0.88)
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
In the paper
“in non-obese individuals with BED, we documented higher than normal release of DA in dorsal striatum (caudate) when exposed to food cues and this increase predicted the severity of the binge eating behaviours (95).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The impact of dysfunction in self-control
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [95] Wang GJ Geliebter A Volkow ND Enhanced striatal dopamine release during food stimulation in binge eating disorder Obesity 2011 19 1601 1608 21350434 PMC3144277 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“this property of palatable foods used to be advantageous in environments where food sources were scarce and/or unreliable because it ensured that food was eaten when available, enabling energy to be stored in the body (as fat) for future use. However, in societies like ours, where food is plentiful and ubiquitous, this adaptation has become a dangerous liability.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The role of dopamine in acute reward to drugs and food
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the debate over whether obesity reflects ‘food addiction’ fails to consider the dimensional nature of these two disorders.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > Background
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Disruption of the DA reward circuit has been implicated in the loss of control seen in both addiction and obesity (2), although the physiological mechanisms that disrupt the function of the DA striatal circuits, including those implicated in reward (ventral striatum) and in habit formation (dorsal striatum), present clear divergences (3).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > Background
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [2] Volkow ND Wang GJ Fowler JS Tomasi D Baler R Food and drug reward: overlapping circuits in human obesity and addiction Curr Top Behav Neurosci 2011 11 1 24 22016109 source
- Not checked yetcites [3] Ziauddeen H Fletcher P Is food addiction a valid and useful concept? Obes Rev 2012 in press PMC3561707 23057499
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“just as most individuals that consume drugs are not addicted, most individuals that eat excessively retain control over their food intake in some instances but not in others.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > Background
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“neurotransmitters implicated in drug-seeking behaviours are also implicated in food intake and, conversely, that peptides that regulate food intake also influence the reinforcing effects of drugs”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > Background
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Tables 1 and 2
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“the regulation of eating behaviours and hence the responses to food, are modulated by multiple peripheral and central mechanisms that directly or indirectly convey information to the brain’s DA reward pathway with a particular prominent role of the hypothalamus”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > Background
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Fig. 1
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Eating behaviours present a great example of this architecture where the hypothalamus subserves the ‘knot’ of the metabolic bowtie (Fig. 3a) and the DA pathways subserve the ‘knot’ for reactivity to salient external stimuli (including drugs and food) and internal signals”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > Dopamine at the centre of brain networks mediating reactivity to environmental stimuli
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Fig. 3a
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“studies are also delineating differences between them that centre on the key role that peripheral signals involved with homeostatic control exert on food intake.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“certain foods, particularly those rich in sugars and fat, are potently rewarding (13) and can trigger addictive-like behaviours in laboratory animals (14,15).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The role of dopamine in acute reward to drugs and food
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [13] Lenoir M Serre F Cantin L Ahmed SH Intense sweetness surpasses cocaine reward Plos ONE 2007 2 e698 17668074 PMC1931610 source
- Not checked yetcites [14] Avena NM Rada P Hoebel BG Evidence for sugar addiction: behavioral and neurochemical effects of intermittent, excessive sugar intake Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2008 32 20 39 17617461 PMC2235907 source
- Not checked yetcites [15] Avena NM Rada P Hoebel BG Sugar and fat bingeing have notable differences in addictive-like behavior J Nutr 2009 139 623 628 19176748 PMC2714381 source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is when these patterns (loss of control and compulsive intake) become rigid and dictate the behaviour and choices of the individual, despite their adverse consequences, that a pathological state akin to the concept of addiction can be invoked.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > Background
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“High-calorie foods can promote over-eating (i.e. eating that is uncoupled from energetic needs) and trigger learned associations between the stimulus and the reward (conditioning).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The role of dopamine in acute reward to drugs and food
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The overwhelming urge to seek and consume a drug is one of the hallmarks of addiction.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > Background
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“there are impairments in circuits involved with self-control and decision-making, interoception and mood and stress regulation (8).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > Background
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [8] Volkow ND Wang GJ Fowler JS Tomasi D Telang F Baler R Addiction: decreased reward sensitivity and increased expectation sensitivity conspire to overwhelm the brain’s control circuit BioEssay 2010 32 748 755 PMC2948245 20730946 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“brain imaging studies are beginning to uncover common features between these two conditions and delineate some of the overlapping brain circuits whose dysfunctions may underlie the observed deficits.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > Abstract
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“these two diseases share neurobiological processes that, when disrupted, can result in compulsive consumption and loss of control in a dimensional continuum, while also involving unique neurobiological processes”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > Background
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“the response to foods in humans, is far more complex, and is influenced not just by its palatability but also by its availability (the patterns of restriction plus overeating, referred to as the eating topography (16)), its visual appeal, economics and incentives (i.e., ‘super sizing’ offers, soda combos), social routines for eating, alternative reinforcement and advertisements (17).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The role of dopamine in acute reward to drugs and food
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“evidence has been accumulating that comparable dopaminergic responses are linked with food reward and that these mechanisms are likely to play a role in excessive food consumption and obesity.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The role of dopamine in acute reward to drugs and food
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Drugs of abuse act on the reward and ancillary circuits through different mechanisms; however, they all lead to sharp DA increases in the NAc.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The role of dopamine in acute reward to drugs and food
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“healthy human volunteers show robust striatal activation upon receipt of a milkshake, and that frequent ice cream consumption blunts the striatal responses (46).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The role of dopamine in acute reward to drugs and food
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [46] Burger KS Stice E Frequent ice cream consumption is associated with reduced striatal response to receipt of an ice cream-based milkshake Am J Clin Nutr 2012 95 810 817 22338036 PMC3302359 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“whereas inherently rewarding novel stimuli engage ventral regions of the striatum (NAc), with repeated exposure, the cues associated with the reward then trigger DA increases in dorsal regions of the striatum (50).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The transition to compulsive consumption
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [50] Robbins TW Cador M Taylor JR Everitt BJ Limbic-striatal interactions in reward-related processes Neurosci Biobehav Rev 1989 13 155 162 2682402 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“peripheral signals that modulate food intake exert their actions in part by hypothalamic signalling to VTA but also by their direct effects on the VTA DA meso-accumbens and meso-limbic pathways.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The role of dopamine in acute reward to drugs and food
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In humans, there have been reports of an inverse relationship between body mass index (BMI) and recent illicit drug use (35) and of an association between obesity and a lower risk for substance use disorders (36).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The role of dopamine in acute reward to drugs and food
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [35] Bluml V Kapusta N Vyssoki B Kogoj D Walter H Lesch OM Relationship between substance use and body mass index in young males Am J Addict 2012 21 72 77 22211349 source
- Not checked yetcites [36] Simon G Von Korff M Saunders K Association between obesity and psychiatric disorders in the US adult population Arch Gen Psychiatry 2006 63 824 830 16818872 PMC1913935 source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“once conditioning has occurred, DA signals act as a predictor of reward (49), incentivizing the animal to perform the behaviour that will result in consuming the expected reward (drug or food).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The transition to compulsive consumption
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [49] Schultz W Dopamine signals for reward value and risk: basic and recent data Behav Brain Funct 2010 6 24 20416052 PMC2876988 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“stimuli that cause fast and large increases in DA induce conditioned responses and elicit incentive motivation to procure them (48).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The transition to compulsive consumption
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [48] Owesson-White CA Ariansen J Stuber GD Neural encoding of cocaine-seeking behavior is coincident with phasic dopamine release in the accumbens core and shell Eur J Neurosci 2009 30 1117 1127 19735286 PMC3107700 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“This is consistent with preclinical (40) and clinical (41) studies showing dynamic associations between the changes in neuroendocrine hormones (e.g. insulin, leptin, ghrelin) triggered by food restriction and brain DA signalling and those of recent reports of a relationship between addictive personality and maladaptive eating behaviours following bariatric surgery (42,43).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The role of dopamine in acute reward to drugs and food
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [40] Thanos PK Michaelides M Piyis YK Wang GJ Volkow ND Food restriction markedly increases dopamine D2 receptor (D2R) in a rat model of obesity as assessed with in-vivo muPET imaging ([11C] raclopride) and in-vitro ([3H] spiperone) autoradiography Synapse 2008 62 50 61 17960763 source
- Not checked yetcites [41] Dunn JP Kessler RM Feurer ID Relationship of dopamine type 2 receptor binding potential with fasting neuroendocrine hormones and insulin sensitivity in human obesity Diabetes Care 2012 35 1105 1111 22432117 PMC3329842 source
- Not checked yetcites [42] Lent MR Swencionis C Addictive personality and maladaptive eating behaviors in adults seeking bariatric surgery Eat Behav 2012 13 67 70 22177401 source
- Not checked yetcites [43] King WC Chen JY Mitchell JE Prevalence of alcohol use disorders before and after bariatric surgery JAMA 2012 307 2516 2525 22710289 PMC3682834 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“downstream adaptations are likely to be involved in the loss of control over food intake just as is the case for drug intake.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The role of dopamine in acute reward to drugs and food
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“anorexigenic peptides (e.g. insulin, leptin, PYY) decrease the sensitivity of the brain reward system to food reward, whereas orexigenic ones (e.g. ghrelin) increase it (see review (47)).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The role of dopamine in acute reward to drugs and food
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [47] Volkow ND Wang GJ Baler RD Reward, dopamine and the control of food intake: implications for obesity Trends Cogn Sci 2011 15 37 46 21109477 PMC3124340 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Orexigenic peptides/hormones increase the activity of VTA DA cells and increase DA release in NAc (main target of VTA DA neurons) when exposed to food stimuli, whereas anorexigenic ones inhibit DA firing and decrease DA release (23).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The role of dopamine in acute reward to drugs and food
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [23] Opland DM Leinninger GM Myers MG Jr Modulation of the mesolimbic dopamine system by leptin Brain Res 2011 1350 65 70 20417193 PMC2921997 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“obese individuals show lower rates of nicotine (37) and marijuana abuse (38) than non-obese individuals.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The role of dopamine in acute reward to drugs and food
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [37] Blendy JA Strasser A Walters CL Reduced nicotine reward in obesity: cross-comparison in human and mouse Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2005 180 306 315 15719224 source
- Not checked yetcites [38] Warren M Frost-Pineda K Gold M Body mass index and marijuana use J Addict Dis 2005 24 95 100 16186086 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“inhibition of striatal D2R or activation of D1R-expressing striatal neurons (which mediate signalling in the striatal direct pathway) enhance the sensitivity to the rewarding effects of drugs (71–73).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The impact of dysfunction in self-control
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [71] Ferguson SM Eskenazi D Ishikawa M Transient neuronal inhibition reveals opposing roles of indirect and direct pathways in sensitization Nat Neurosci 2010 14 22 24 21131952 PMC3058296 source
- Not checked yetcites [72] Hikida T Kimura K Wada N Funabiki K Nakanishi S Distinct roles of synaptic transmission in direct and indirect striatal pathways to reward and aversive behavior Neuron 2010 66 896 907 20620875 source
- Not checked yetcites [73] Lobo MK Covington HE3rd Chaudhury D Cell type-specific loss of BDNF signaling mimics optogenetic control of cocaine reward Science 2010 330 385 390 20947769 PMC3011229 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“when non-obese male subjects were asked to inhibit their craving for food while being exposed to food cues, they exhibited decreased metabolic activity in amygdala and OFC (as well as in hippocampus), insula and striatum, and that the decreases in OFC were associated with reductions in food craving (56).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The transition to compulsive consumption
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [56] Wang GJ Volkow ND Telang F Evidence of gender differences in the ability to inhibit brain activation elicited by food stimulation Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009 106 1249 1254 19164587 PMC2633545 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The dependence of the responses to food cues on the nutrition status (60,61) highlights the role of the homeostatic network in the control of the reward network, which in turn is also influenced by neuronal pathways that process stress.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The transition to compulsive consumption
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [60] Bragulat V Dzemidzic M Bruno C Food-related odor probes of brain reward circuits during hunger: a pilot FMRI study Obesity (Silver Spring) 2012 18 1566 1571 20339365 source
- Not checked yetcites [61] Stockburger J Schmalzle R Flaisch T Bublatzky F Schupp HT The impact of hunger on food cue processing: an event-related brain potential study Neuroimage 2009 47 1819 1829 19409497 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Both preclinical and clinical studies have provided evidence of decreases in striatal D2R, which, through the NAc, are linked with reward and through the dorsal striatum with the establishment of habits and routines in obesity (80–82).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The impact of dysfunction in self-control
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [80] Geiger BM Haburcak M Avena NM Moyer MC Hoebel BG Pothos EN Deficits of mesolimbic dopamine neurotransmission in rat dietary obesity Neuroscience 2009 159 1193 1199 19409204 PMC2677693 source
- Not checked yetcites [81] Wang GJ Volkow ND Logan J Brain dopamine and obesity Lancet 2001 357 354 357 11210998 source
- Not checked yetcites [82] de Weijer BA van de Giessen E van Amelsvoort TA Lower striatal dopamine D2/3 receptor availability in obese compared with non-obese subjects EJNMMI Res 2012 1 37 22214469 PMC3265412 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“because impairments in OFC and ACC are associated with compulsive behaviours and impulsivity, DA’s impaired modulation of these regions is likely to contribute to the compulsive and impulsive drug intake seen in addiction (76).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The impact of dysfunction in self-control
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [76] Goldstein RZ Volkow ND Drug addiction and its underlying neurobiological basis: neuroimaging evidence for the involvement of the frontal cortex Am J Psychiatry 2002 159 1642 1652 12359667 PMC1201373 source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In the striatum, D2Rs mediate signalling in the striatal indirect pathway that modulates frontal cortical regions; and their down-regulation enhances sensitization to the effects of drugs in animal models (68), whereas their up-regulation interferes with drug consumption (69,70).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The impact of dysfunction in self-control
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [68] Ferguson SM Eskenazi D Ishikawa M Transient neuronal inhibition reveals opposing roles of indirect and direct pathways in sensitization Nat Neurosci 2011 14 22 24 21131952 PMC3058296 source
- Not checked yetcites [69] Thanos PK Michaelides M Umegaki H Volkow ND D2R DNA transfer into the nucleus accumbens attenuates cocaine self-administration in rats Synapse 2008 62 481 486 18418874 PMC2659016 source
- Not checked yetcites [70] Thanos PK Volkow ND Freimuth P Overexpression of dopamine D2 receptors reduces alcohol self-administration J Neurochem 2001 78 1094 1103 11553683 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A reverse scenario would depend on a pre-existing vulnerability for drug use in prefrontal regions, possibly exacerbated by further decreases in striatal D2R triggered by repeated drug use.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The impact of dysfunction in self-control
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This suggests that, in these subjects at risk for alcoholism, the normal prefrontal function was linked to enhanced striatal D2R signalling, which in turn may have protected them from alcohol abuse.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The impact of dysfunction in self-control
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Given that dysfunction in OFC and ACC results in compulsivity (see review (85)), this might be part of the mechanism by which low-striatal D2R signalling facilitates hyperphagia (86,87).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The impact of dysfunction in self-control
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [85] Fineberg NA Potenza MN Chamberlain SR Probing compulsive and impulsive behaviors, from animal models to endophenotypes: a narrative review Neuropsychopharmacology 2009 35 591 604 19940844 PMC3055606 source
- Not checked yetcites [86] Davis LM Michaelides M Cheskin LJ Bromocriptine administration reduces hyperphagia and adiposity and differentially affects dopamine D2 receptor and transporter binding in leptin-receptor-deficient Zucker rats and rats with diet-induced obesity Neuroendocrinology 2009 89 152 162 18984941 PMC2681080 source
- Not checked yetcites [87] Holsen LM Savage CR Martin LE Importance of reward and prefrontal circuitry in hunger and satiety: Prader-Willi syndrome vs. simple obesity Int J Obes (Lond) 2012 36 638 647 22024642 PMC3270121 source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“the negative correlation between BMI and striatal D2R reported in obese (81) and in overweight (96) individuals, as well as the correlation between BMI and decreased blood flow in prefrontal regions in healthy individuals (97,98) and decreased prefrontal metabolism in obese subjects (63) support this.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The impact of dysfunction in self-control
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [81] Wang GJ Volkow ND Logan J Brain dopamine and obesity Lancet 2001 357 354 357 11210998 source
- Not checked yetcites [96] Haltia LT Rinne JO Merisaari H Effects of intravenous glucose on dopaminergic function in the human brain in vivo Synapse 2007 61 748 756 17568412 source
- Not checked yetcites [97] Willeumier KC Taylor DV Amen DG Elevated BMI is associated with decreased blood flow in the prefrontal cortex using SPECT imaging in healthy adults Obesity (Silver Spring) 2011 19 1095 1097 21311507 PMC3125099 source
- Not checked yetcites [98] Volkow ND Wang GJ Telang F Inverse association between BMI and prefrontal metabolic activity in healthy adults Obesity 2009 17 60 65 18948965 PMC2681079 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These processes are modulated by D1R and D2R (presumably also D4R) and thus, the decreased activity in PFC, both in addiction and in obesity, is likely to contribute to poor self-control, impulsivity and high compulsivity.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The impact of dysfunction in self-control
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This suggests a dynamic interaction between the amount of food eaten (reflected in part in the BMI) and the reactivity of reward regions to high-calorie food (reflected in the activation of OFC and ACC) in normal-weight individuals but which was not observed in obese individuals.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The impact of dysfunction in self-control
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“while these studies cannot address the question of whether the emerging association between low D2R and high BMI points to causality”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The impact of dysfunction in self-control
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The prefrontal cortex (PFC) plays a crucial role in executive function, including self-control.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The impact of dysfunction in self-control
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The lower-than-normal availability of D2R in the striatum of obese individuals, which has been associated with reduced activity in PFC and ACC (63) is therefore likely to contribute to their deficient control over food intake.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The impact of dysfunction in self-control
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [63] Volkow ND Wang GJ Telang F Low dopamine striatal D2 receptors are associated with prefrontal metabolism in obese subjects: possible contributing factors Neuroimage 2008 42 1537 1543 18598772 PMC2659013 source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“decreased striatal D2R availability has been linked to compulsive food intake in obese rodents (84) and with decreased metabolic activity in OFC and ACC in obese humans (63).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The impact of dysfunction in self-control
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [84] Johnson PM Kenny PJ Dopamine D2 receptors in addictionlike reward dysfunction and compulsive eating in obese rats Nat Neurosci 2010 13 635 641 20348917 PMC2947358 source
- Not checked yetcites [63] Volkow ND Wang GJ Telang F Low dopamine striatal D2 receptors are associated with prefrontal metabolism in obese subjects: possible contributing factors Neuroimage 2008 42 1537 1543 18598772 PMC2659013 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“An enhanced activity in brain regions that process palatability could make obese subjects favour food over other natural reinforcers, whereas decreased activation of dopaminergic targets by the actual food consumption might lead to overconsumption as a means to compensate for weak D2R-mediated signalling (93).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The impact of dysfunction in self-control
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [93] Stice E Spoor S Bohon C Small DM Relation between obesity and blunted striatal response to food is moderated by TaqIA A1 allele Science 2008 322 449 452 18927395 PMC2681095 source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“since decreased striatal D2R-related signalling is also likely to reduce the sensitivity to other natural rewards, this deficit in obese individuals may also contribute to compensatory overeating (88).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The impact of dysfunction in self-control
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [88] Geiger BM Behr GG Frank LE Evidence for defective mesolimbic dopamine exocytosis in obesity-prone rats FASEB J 2008 22 2740 2746 18477764 PMC2728544 source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“obese individuals exhibited less activation of reward circuits from actual food consumption (consummatory food reward) than lean individuals, whereas they showed greater activation of somatosensory cortical regions that process palatability when they anticipated consumption (91).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The impact of dysfunction in self-control
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [91] Stice E Spoor S Bohon C Veldhuizen MG Small DM Relation of reward from food intake and anticipated food intake to obesity: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study J Abnorm Psychol 2008 117 924 935 19025237 PMC2681092 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“PET studies with FDG to measure brain glucose metabolism in normal-weight individuals reported that exposure to food cues increased metabolic activity in OFC, which was associated with the desire for the food (117).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > Overlapping dysfunction in the motivation circuits
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [117] Wang GJ Volkow ND Telang F Exposure to appetitive food stimuli markedly activates the human brain Neuroimage 2004 21 1790 1797 15050599 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“For example, an MRI study done in elderly women, using voxel-based morphometry, found a negative correlation between BMI and grey matter volumes (including frontal regions), which, in the OFC, was associated with impaired executive function (126).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > Overlapping dysfunction in the motivation circuits
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [126] Walther K Birdsill AC Glisky EL Ryan L Structural brain differences and cognitive functioning related to body mass index in older females Hum Brain Mapp 2010 31 1052 1064 19998366 PMC6870943 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Moreover, when the responses to i.v. methylphenidate are compared between cocaine-addicted and non-addicted individuals, the former responded with increased metabolism in ventral ACC and medial OFC (an effect associated with craving), while the latter showed decreased metabolism in these regions (114).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > Overlapping dysfunction in the motivation circuits
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [114] Volkow ND Wang GJ Ma Y Activation of orbital and medial prefrontal cortex by methylphenidate in cocaine-addicted subjects but not in controls: relevance to addiction J Neurosci 2005 25 3932 3939 15829645 PMC6724925 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The enhanced OFC activation by the food stimulation is likely to reflect downstream dopaminergic effects and participate in DA’s involvement in the drive for food consumption.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > Overlapping dysfunction in the motivation circuits
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Another study found no differences in grey matter volumes between obese and lean subjects; however, it did record a positive correlation between white matter volume in basal brain structures and waist to hip ratios, a trend that was partially reversed by dieting (129).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > Overlapping dysfunction in the motivation circuits
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [129] Haltia LT Viljanen A Parkkola R Brain white matter expansion in human obesity and the recovering effect of dieting J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2007 92 3278 3284 17536002 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Because drug taking becomes the main motivational drive in drug addiction (110), addicted subjects are aroused and motivated by the process of obtaining the drug but tend to become withdrawn and apathetic when exposed to non–drug-related activities.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > Overlapping dysfunction in the motivation circuits
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [110] Volkow ND Fowler JS Wang GJ The addicted human brain: insights from imaging studies J Clin Invest 2003 111 1444 1451 12750391 PMC155054 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This suggests that the activation of these prefrontal regions with drug exposure may be specific to addiction and associated with the enhanced desire for the drug.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > Overlapping dysfunction in the motivation circuits
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In contrast, when tasting sucrose, subjects who have recovered from anorexia nervosa show less insular activation and no association with feelings of pleasantness as observed in controls (145).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The involvement of interoceptive circuitry
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [145] Wagner A Aizenstein H Mazurkewicz L Altered insula response to taste stimuli in individuals recovered from restricting-type anorexia nervosa Neuropsychopharmacology 2008 33 513 523 17487228 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The insula, particularly its more anterior regions, is reciprocally connected to several limbic regions (e.g. ventromedial prefrontal cortex, amygdala, and ventral striatum) and appears to have an interoceptive function, integrating the autonomic and visceral information with emotion and motivation, thus providing conscious awareness of these urges (135).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The involvement of interoceptive circuitry
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [135] Naqvi NH Bechara A The hidden island of addiction: the insula Trends Neurosci 2009 32 56 67 18986715 PMC3698860 source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“For example, when normal-weight women tasted a sweetener with calories (sucrose), both the insula and dopaminergic midbrain areas became activated, whereas tasting a calorie-free sweetener (sucralose) only activated the insula (144).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The involvement of interoceptive circuitry
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [144] Frank GK Oberndorfer TA Simmons AN Sucrose activates human taste pathways differently from artificial sweetener Neuroimage 2008 39 1559 1569 18096409 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The observed changes suggest excessive input from the amygdala and insula; these, in turn could trigger exaggerated stimulus-response learning and incentive motivation to food cues in the dorsal caudate nucleus, which could become overwhelming in light of weak inhibitory control by fronto-cortical regions.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The involvement of interoceptive circuitry
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Similar antireward responses (including increased stress reactivity, negative mood and discomfort) may also contribute to excessive food consumption in obesity and to the high propensity to relapse when dieting after exposure to a stressful or frustrating event.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The circuitry of aversion and stress reactivity
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Findings from animal models of cocaine addiction and palatable-food-induced obesity can be generalized to human addiction and obesity.
In the paper
“A highly palatable food diet can induce obesity in rats, with the weight increases correlating with increases in m-opioid peptide binding in the basolateral and basomedial amygdala.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The circuitry of aversion and stress reactivity
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [157] Smith SL Harrold JA Williams G Diet-induced obesity increases mu opioid receptor binding in specific regions of the rat brain Brain Res 2002 953 215 222 12384255 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Moreover, neurons in the rostromedial tegmental nucleus, which receive a major input from the lateral habenula, project to VTA DA neurons and are activated after food deprivation (158).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The circuitry of aversion and stress reactivity
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [158] Jhou TC Fields HL Baxter MG Saper CB Holland PC The rostromedial tegmental nucleus (RMTg), a GABAergic afferent to midbrain dopamine neurons, encodes aversive stimuli and inhibits motor responses Neuron 2009 61 786 800 19285474 PMC2841475 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The many mechanistic and behavioural parallels identified between addiction and obesity suggest the value of multipronged parallel therapeutic approaches for both of these disorders.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > In closing
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The picture that is emerging is that obesity, similar to drug addiction (226), appears to result from imbalanced processing in a range of regions implicated in reward/saliency, motivation/drive, emotion/stress reactivity, memory/conditioning, executive function/self-control and interoception, in addition to possible imbalances in the homeostatic regulation of food intake.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > In closing
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [226] Carnell S Gibson C Benson L Ochner CN Geliebter A Neuroimaging and obesity: current knowledge and future directions Obes Rev 2011 13 43 56 21902800 PMC3241905 source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Brain activation or metabolism differences observed in obese versus lean individuals reflect dysfunction in the underlying circuits rather than consequences of obesity.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Also, whether tested during early or protracted periods of abstinence/ dieting, addicted/obese subjects show lower D2R in striatum (including NAc), which are associated with decreases in baseline activity in frontal brain regions implicated in salience attribution (OFC) and inhibitory control (ACC and DLPFC), whose disruption results in compulsivity and impulsivity.”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > In closing
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
Findings from rodent and non-human primate models of drug and food reward can be generalized to human obesity and addiction.
“Experiments in rodents have shown that, upon first exposure to a food reward, the firing of DA neurons in the VTA increases with a resulting increase in DA release in NAc (22).”
The paper relies on this without support.
Brain imaging signals such as striatal activation and D2R availability index the reward, motivation, and self-control processes discussed.
“Brain imaging studies are beginning to provide important clues about such overlapping functional circuitry.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Findings from animal models of cocaine addiction and palatable-food-induced obesity can be generalized to human addiction and obesity.
“The habenula appears to play a similar role with regards to food reward.”
“These findings are consistent with a role for the habenula (both medial and lateral) in mediating responses to aversive stimuli or to states of deprivation such as during dieting or drug withdrawal.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Brain activation or metabolism differences observed in obese versus lean individuals reflect dysfunction in the underlying circuits rather than consequences of obesity.
“In spite of some inconsistencies among studies, brain imaging data also support the notion that structural and functional changes in brain regions implicated in executive function (including inhibitory control) may be associated with high BMI in otherwise healthy individuals.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“It can also interfere with action plans, favoring immediate rewards over long-term benefits [32].”
From Social Media Algorithms and Teen Addiction: Neurophysiological Impact and Ethical Considerations (2025) · cites this paper as [32]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Reward mechanisms, important in both AUD and food overconsumption behavior, are driven by a disparity between expected effects and reduced rewards. This is believed to be associated with lower dopamine receptor levels in the striatum”
From A Narrative Review of Current and Emerging Trends in the Treatment of Alcohol Use Disorder (2024) · cites this paper as [94]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“Neurobiological overlaps between obesity and addiction have been described within the mesolimbic pathway between the ventral tegmental area (VTA) and the ventral striatum, with further projection to limbic (amygdala and hippocampus) and cortical regions (prefrontal cortex [PFC] and cingulate gyrus) [64].”
From Food Addiction and Psychosocial Adversity: Biological Embedding, Contextual Factors, and Public Health Implications (2020) · cites this paper as [64]
In the citing paper
“Neuroimaging studies have identified some of the brain mechanisms associated with obesity and food addiction 39, 40, demonstrating alterations in the core reward network (e.g. nucleus accumbens) and the extended reward network (i.e. emotion regulation, executive control, salience and somatosensory networks) 41, 42, 43.”
From History of early life adversity is associated with increased food addiction and sex-specific alterations in reward network connectivity in obesity (2019) · cites this paper as [40]
In the citing paper
“Similar to other addictive disorders in which perturbations in brain regions within the core and extended reward networks have been reported, a less responsive dopamine system leads to a greater propensity towards obesity 40, 85, 86, 87, 88.”
From History of early life adversity is associated with increased food addiction and sex-specific alterations in reward network connectivity in obesity (2019) · cites this paper as [40]
In the citing paper
“Food addiction has been implicated in obesity as a result of alterations in the extended reward network 39, 40, 94; the somatosensory network represents an important component of the extended reward network, playing a key role in interoceptive and sensory awareness and generating appropriate motor responses 41, 100, 101.”
From History of early life adversity is associated with increased food addiction and sex-specific alterations in reward network connectivity in obesity (2019) · cites this paper as [40]
In the citing paper
“These study results are consistent with previous studies, which have demonstrated decreased functional activation and anatomical connectivity of somatosensory regions in obesity 40, 41, 53, 56, 57, 98, 99.”
From History of early life adversity is associated with increased food addiction and sex-specific alterations in reward network connectivity in obesity (2019) · cites this paper as [40]
In the citing paper
“The findings reported here, which suggest that men with high BMI differ from their female counterparts in the processing and modulation of rewarding food stimuli, may be attributed to the ability of oestrogen to modulate dopaminergic and serotonergic signalling 40, 111.”
From History of early life adversity is associated with increased food addiction and sex-specific alterations in reward network connectivity in obesity (2019) · cites this paper as [40]
In the citing paper
“Specifically, several hormones and neuropeptides involved in energy homeostasis influence the DA reward pathway (9).”
From The Addictive Dimensionality of Obesity (2013) · cites this paper as [9]
In the citing paper
“Predictably then, many neurotransmitters implicated in drug-seeking behaviors are also implicated in food intake (9).”
From The Addictive Dimensionality of Obesity (2013) · cites this paper as [9]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The impact of dysfunction in self-control
“whereas in the non-addicted siblings, the OFC did not differ from that of controls (79).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > References
“79. Parvaz MA Maloney T Moeller SJ Sensitivity to monetary reward is most severely compromised in recently abstaining cocaine addicted individuals: a cross-sectional ERP study Psychiatry Res 2012 203 75 82 22841343 PMC3444645”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > The impact of dysfunction in self-control
“The hypothesis of compensatory overeating is consistent with preclinical evidence showing that decreased DA activity in VTA results in a dramatic increase in the consumption of high-fat foods (89).”
§ Pro v Con Reviews: Is Food Addictive? > References
“89. Stoeckel LE Weller RE Cook EW3rd Twieg DB Knowlton RC Cox JE Widespread reward-system activation in obese women in response to pictures of high-calorie foods Neuroimage 2008 41 636 647 18413289”
Citations
Cites
A neural substrate of prediction and reward
Schultz, W., Dayan, P., & Montague, P. R. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.275.5306.1593 · Cited by 9,388
Goldstein, R. Z., & Volkow, N. D. (2002) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.159.10.1642 · Cited by 2,667
Self-citationInteroception: the sense of the physiological condition of the body
(Bud) Craig, A. (2003) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0959-4388(03)00090-4 · Cited by 2,556
Drug abuse: hedonic homeostatic dysregulation
Koob, G. F., & Moal, M. L. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.278.5335.52 · Cited by 2,535
Wang, G.-J., Volkow, N. D., Logan, J., Pappas, N. R., Wong, C. T., Zhu, W., Netusll, N., & Fowler, J. S. (2001) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(00)03643-6 · Cited by 1,864
Self-citationDopamine D2 receptors in addiction-like reward dysfunction and compulsive eating in obese rats
Johnson, P. M., & Kenny, P. J. (2010) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.2519 · Cited by 1,495
Addiction and the brain antireward system
Koob, G. F., & Le Moal, M. (2008) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093548 · Cited by 1,457
Reward, dopamine and the control of food intake: implications for obesity
Volkow, N. D., Wang, G.-J., & Baler, R. D. (2011) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.11.001 · Cited by 1,400
Self-citationAvena, N. M., Rada, P., & Hoebel, B. G. (2008) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2007.04.019 · Cited by 1,358
Association between obesity and psychiatric disorders in the US adult population
Simon, G. E., Von Korff, M., Saunders, K., Miglioretti, D. L., Crane, P. K., van Belle, G., & Kessler, R. C. (2006) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.63.7.824 · Cited by 1,338
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- 10.1038/nn.2703 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6326-11.2012 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pharmacological Management of Obesity: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline
Apovian, C. M., Aronne, L. J., Bessesen, D. H., McDonnell, M. E., Murad, M. H., Pagotto, U., Ryan, D. H., & Still, C. D. (2015) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2014-3415 · Cited by 1,347
Metabolism disrupting chemicals and metabolic disorders
Heindel, J. J., Blumberg, B., Cave, M., Machtinger, R., Mantovani, A., Mendez, M. A., Nadal, A., Palanza, P., Panzica, G., Sargis, R., et al. (2017) · Reproductive Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.reprotox.2016.10.001 · Cited by 1,101
Development of the Yale Food Addiction Scale Version 2.0
Gearhardt, A. N., Corbin, W. R., & Brownell, K. D. (2016) · Psychology of Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1037/adb0000136 · Cited by 740
Food cue reactivity and craving predict eating and weight gain: A meta-analytic review
Boswell, R. G., & Kober, H. (2016) · Obesity Reviews · doi:10.1111/obr.12354 · Cited by 703
Tomiyama, A. J. (2019) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102936 · Cited by 695
“Dopamine is a neurotransmitter that codes for pleasure and enhances the desire for food (Volkow et al. 2013).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Volkow, N. D., Wang, G. ‐., Tomasi, D., & Baler, R. D.
- Affiliations
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- Brookhaven National Laboratory (US)
- Corresponding author
- Volkow, N. D.
- Venue
- Obesity Reviews
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-09-27
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 2-18
- ISSN
- 1467-7881 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-789X
- PMC
- PMC4827343
- OpenAlex
- W1780379214
- Semantic Scholar
- d0d3429f0da3f6b9065a66bb07312bf81e831063
- Cited by
- 800
- References
- 224
- Citations by year
- 2026: 44 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 65 · 2021: 60 · 2020: 111 · 2019: 57 · 2018: 69 · 2017: 57 · 2016: 60 · 2015: 70 · 2014: 67 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 5.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Obesity Reviews (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (ZIAAA000550)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
- Keywords
- obesity, drug addiction, reward salience, dopamine, brain reward circuits, homeostatic regulation, food intake regulation, incentive motivation, self-control, stress reactivity, interoceptive awareness, neuroimaging
- MeSH terms
- Brain, Dopamine, Eating, Humans, Models, Biological, Neural Pathways, Obesity, Reward, Comorbidity, Behavior, Addictive, Substance-Related Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-09, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-09 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review