Cited by 800Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorRegulation of Appetite and ObesityEating Disorders and Behaviors

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 224 of the 224 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 6 of the 178 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

Obesity and addiction: neurobiological overlaps

Open access

Abstract

Summary: Drug addiction and obesity appear to share several properties. Both can be defined as disorders in which the saliency of a specific type of reward (food or drug) becomes exaggerated relative to, and at the expense of others rewards. Both drugs and food have powerful reinforcing effects, which are in part mediated by abrupt dopamine increases in the brain reward centres. The abrupt dopamine increases, in vulnerable individuals, can override the brain's homeostatic control mechanisms. These parallels have generated interest in understanding the shared vulnerabilities between addiction and obesity. Predictably, they also engendered a heated debate. Specifically, brain imaging studies are beginning to uncover common features between these two conditions and delineate some of the overlapping brain circuits whose dysfunctions may underlie the observed deficits. The combined results suggest that both obese and drug‐addicted individuals suffer from impairments in dopaminergic pathways that regulate neuronal systems associated not only with reward sensitivity and incentive motivation, but also with conditioning, self‐control, stress reactivity and interoceptive awareness. In parallel, studies are also delineating differences between them that centre on the key role that peripheral signals involved with homeostatic control exert on food intake. Here, we focus on the shared neurobiological substrates of obesity and addiction.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This review argues that obesity and drug addiction share overlapping neurobiological substrates, especially disrupted dopamine pathways involved in reward, motivation, conditioning, self-control, stress reactivity, and interoception. It proposes that compulsive food intake and drug taking arise from imbalanced processing across these circuits, while homeostatic and peripheral feeding signals remain a key difference.

Key findings

  • Both obese and drug-addicted individuals show impairments in dopaminergic pathways, including lower striatal dopamine D2 receptor (D2R) availability linked to decreased activity in prefrontal regions such as OFC, ACC, and DLPFC, which the paper associates with compulsivity and impulsivity.
  • Obese individuals show lower rates of nicotine and marijuana abuse than non-obese individuals, and there is an inverse relationship between BMI and recent illicit drug use; the paper suggests food and drugs may compete for overlapping reward mechanisms.
  • Obese individuals exhibit less activation of reward circuits from actual food consumption than lean individuals but greater activation of somatosensory cortical regions processing palatability during anticipation; in non-obese individuals with binge eating disorder, higher dopamine release in dorsal striatum to food cues predicted binge-eating severity.
  • In rats, medial habenula mu-opioid peptide binding was approximately 40% higher after palatable-food exposure in those that gained weight; a latent class analysis of 997 fourth graders linked executive function to obesity risk.

Methods

  • Narrative review/position paper, not a primary study; it synthesizes human neuroimaging (PET, fMRI), preclinical rodent and non-human primate, clinical, genetic, and pharmacological evidence.
  • The review focuses on shared neurobiological substrates of obesity and addiction, comparing circuits for reward/saliency, motivation/drive, conditioning, self-control, interoception, and aversion/stress reactivity.
  • Main analysis is qualitative integration of cited literature; no systematic search, meta-analysis, or new data are reported.

Limitations

  • Stated in the paper: D2R-BMI studies cannot address causality; one negative D2R study may have been hampered by low statistical power (n = 5/group); some inconsistencies exist among studies; the role of direct versus indirect striatal pathways in eating remains to be explored; and dopamine modulation of insular activity is poorly investigated.
  • Evident from the text: this is a selective narrative review without systematic search or formal bias assessment, and it relies heavily on animal models and cross-sectional human imaging, so many cited associations are correlational.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-789x.2012.01031.x

Cites

224 of 224 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

123 Not checked yet · 47 Own interpretation · 10 No basis given · 2 Partly supported · 1 Supported · accuracy not yet measured

Verify all 172 references — free account

Show all 115 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 60
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 12
68 of 68
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Findings from rodent and non-human primate models of drug and food reward can be generalized to human obesity and addiction.

    “Experiments in rodents have shown that, upon first exposure to a food reward, the firing of DA neurons in the VTA increases with a resulting increase in DA release in NAc (22).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Brain imaging signals such as striatal activation and D2R availability index the reward, motivation, and self-control processes discussed.

    “Brain imaging studies are beginning to provide important clues about such overlapping functional circuitry.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Findings from animal models of cocaine addiction and palatable-food-induced obesity can be generalized to human addiction and obesity.

    “The habenula appears to play a similar role with regards to food reward.”
    “These findings are consistent with a role for the habenula (both medial and lateral) in mediating responses to aversive stimuli or to states of deprivation such as during dieting or drug withdrawal.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Brain activation or metabolism differences observed in obese versus lean individuals reflect dysfunction in the underlying circuits rather than consequences of obesity.

    “In spite of some inconsistencies among studies, brain imaging data also support the notion that structural and functional changes in brain regions implicated in executive function (including inhibitory control) may be associated with high BMI in otherwise healthy individuals.”
4 of 4

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

2 of 2

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. 10.1038/nn.2703 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6326-11.2012 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 800

Metadata

Authors
Volkow, N. D., Wang, G. ‐., Tomasi, D., & Baler, R. D.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Brookhaven National Laboratory (US)
Corresponding author
Volkow, N. D.
Venue
Obesity Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-09-27
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
2-18
ISSN
  • 1467-7881 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-789X
OpenAlex
W1780379214
Cited by
800
References
224
Citations by year
2026: 44 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 65 · 2021: 60 · 2020: 111 · 2019: 57 · 2018: 69 · 2017: 57 · 2016: 60 · 2015: 70 · 2014: 67 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 1
FWCI
5.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Obesity Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (ZIAAA000550)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
Keywords
obesity, drug addiction, reward salience, dopamine, brain reward circuits, homeostatic regulation, food intake regulation, incentive motivation, self-control, stress reactivity, interoceptive awareness, neuroimaging
MeSH terms
Brain, Dopamine, Eating, Humans, Models, Biological, Neural Pathways, Obesity, Reward, Comorbidity, Behavior, Addictive, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-09, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-09 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review