Cited by 277Probiotics and Fermented FoodsGut microbiota and healthAnimal Nutrition and Physiology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 288 of the 291 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 3 of the 197 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics

Open access

Abstract

Position statement: The International Society of Sports Nutrition (ISSN) provides an objective and critical review of the mechanisms and use of probiotic supplementation to optimize the health, performance, and recovery of athletes. Based on the current available literature, the conclusions of the ISSN are as follows: 1)Probiotics are live microorganisms that, when administered in adequate amounts, confer a health benefit on the host (FAO/WHO).2)Probiotic administration has been linked to a multitude of health benefits, with gut and immune health being the most researched applications.3)Despite the existence of shared, core mechanisms for probiotic function, health benefits of probiotics are strain- and dose-dependent.4)Athletes have varying gut microbiota compositions that appear to reflect the activity level of the host in comparison to sedentary people, with the differences linked primarily to the volume of exercise and amount of protein consumption. Whether differences in gut microbiota composition affect probiotic efficacy is unknown.5)The main function of the gut is to digest food and absorb nutrients. In athletic populations, certain probiotics strains can increase absorption of key nutrients such as amino acids from protein, and affect the pharmacology and physiological properties of multiple food components.6)Immune depression in athletes worsens with excessive training load, psychological stress, disturbed sleep, and environmental extremes, all of which can contribute to an increased risk of respiratory tract infections. In certain situations, including exposure to crowds, foreign travel and poor hygiene at home, and training or competition venues, athletes' exposure to pathogens may be elevated leading to increased rates of infections. Approximately 70% of the immune system is located in the gut and probiotic supplementation has been shown to promote a healthy immune response. In an athletic population, specific probiotic strains can reduce the number of episodes, severity and duration of upper respiratory tract infections.7)Intense, prolonged exercise, especially in the heat, has been shown to increase gut permeability which potentially can result in systemic toxemia. Specific probiotic strains can improve the integrity of the gut-barrier function in athletes.8)Administration of selected anti-inflammatory probiotic strains have been linked to improved recovery from muscle-damaging exercise.9)The minimal effective dose and method of administration (potency per serving, single vs. split dose, delivery form) of a specific probiotic strain depends on validation studies for this particular strain. Products that contain probiotics must include the genus, species, and strain of each live microorganism on its label as well as the total estimated quantity of each probiotic strain at the end of the product's shelf life, as measured by colony forming units (CFU) or live cells.10)Preclinical and early human research has shown potential probiotic benefits relevant to an athletic population that include improved body composition and lean body mass, normalizing age-related declines in testosterone levels, reductions in cortisol levels indicating improved responses to a physical or mental stressor, reduction of exercise-induced lactate, and increased neurotransmitter synthesis, cognition and mood. However, these potential benefits require validation in more rigorous human studies and in an athletic population.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This ISSN position stand critically reviews probiotic supplementation for athletes and concludes that benefits are strain- and dose-dependent, with the strongest evidence for immune and gut health and mixed evidence for performance. Specific strains may reduce upper respiratory tract infection episodes/severity and improve recovery, but more rigorous athlete studies are needed.

Key findings

  • Of 24 studies assessing athletic performance, 17 reported a null effect and 7 reported significant improvement; single-strain probiotics produced a significant aerobic performance benefit in only one study, while multi-strain results were mixed.
  • Of 22 studies assessing immune outcomes, 14 reported significant improvement and 8 reported no effects. In 465 active individuals, daily *B. animalis* ssp. *lactis* Bl-04 for 150 days was associated with a 27% reduction in risk of any URTI episode; a double-strain probiotic produced a 19% decrease that was not statistically significant, and both probiotic groups showed a ~0.8-month delay in time to illness.
  • Of 10 studies assessing GI benefit, the majority reported no effect, but four reported positive results, including decreased zonulin, decreased endotoxin, reduced intestinal hyperpermeability, and shorter duration of GI-symptom episodes.
  • Safety data were limited: 11 studies measured adverse events and general supplementation tolerance, while 30 did not; supplementation was generally well tolerated, with one instance of mild GI symptoms (5 episodes) reported in 22 active individuals taking a multi-strain probiotic.

Methods

  • Design: International Society of Sports Nutrition position stand providing an objective and critical review of mechanisms and use of probiotic supplementation to optimize athlete health, performance, and recovery.
  • Data: Review of studies in athletes and physically active individuals, including performance, immune, and GI outcomes; doses and durations varied widely, and a PubMed search in October 2019 yielded 145 listings for “probiotic and athlete” versus 3407 for “probiotic and rodent.”
  • Analysis: Narrative synthesis of the available literature; no meta-analysis or pooled effect estimates are reported.

Limitations

  • The paper states there is no clear set of recommendations or guidelines on probiotic use for athletes; effects are strain- and dose-specific, and studies vary considerably in species/strains, duration, dosage, and outcome measures, making comparison difficult.
  • The paper states there are a small number of studies with substantial variation in experimental approaches, dependent measures, and outcomes; most studies do not control for previous physical activity, long-term effects are unclear because most supplementation periods were 4–16 weeks, and sex differences and small sample sizes require further study.
  • The paper states adverse events are often not well recorded in nutritional studies, including probiotics (11 studies measured AEs; 30 did not); evident from the text, this is a narrative position stand rather than a systematic review or meta-analysis, so it does not provide formal risk-of-bias assessment or pooled effect estimates.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12970-019-0329-0

Cites

288 of 288 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Figures

Fig. 1 Probiotic benefits are strain specific and probiotics must be described as genus, species and strain, as genetic variation between the same genus and species can be as significant as the difference between a human and a lemur (illustration by Stephen Somers, Milwaukee, WI, USA)
Fig. 1 Probiotic benefits are strain specific and probiotics must be described as genus, species and strain, as genetic variation between the same genus and species can be as significant as the difference between a human and a lemur (illustration by Stephen Somers, Milwaukee, WI, USA)CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 2 Early research indicates that gut bacteria reflect the activity level of its host. An athlete’s gut microbiota is different from a sedentary individual: increased diversity and greater abundance of health promoting bacterial species linked to exercise and increased protein intake (illustration by Stephen Somers, Milwaukee, WI, USA)
Fig. 2 Early research indicates that gut bacteria reflect the activity level of its host. An athlete’s gut microbiota is different from a sedentary individual: increased diversity and greater abundance of health promoting bacterial species linked to exercise and increased protein intake (illustration by Stephen Somers, Milwaukee, WI, USA)CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

145 Not checked yet · 51 No basis given · 47 Own interpretation · 9 Own result · 2 Partly supported · 1 Supported · 1 Own method · accuracy not yet measured

Verify all 194 references — free account

Show all 113 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 90
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 74
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 5
143 of 143
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Approximately 70% of the immune system is located in the gut.

    “Approximately 70% of the immune system is located in the gut”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Episodes of illness often occur during heavy exercise training periods, a time when athletes obtain the greatest improvements in fitness.

    “Episodes of illness often occur during heavy exercise training periods, a time when athletes obtain the greatest improvements in fitness.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Illness that interrupts individual training sessions may prevent athletes from maximizing the effects of their training program.

    “Illness that interrupts individual training sessions may prevent athletes from maximizing the effects of their training program.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Disruption in the GI system can impair the delivery of nutrients, and cause GI symptoms and decreased performance.

    “Disruption in the GI system can impair the delivery of nutrients, and cause GI symptoms and decreased performance.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The studies included in this position stand are representative of probiotic supplementation in athletes and physically active individuals.

    “In this position stand, which reviews studies focused on probiotic supplementation in athletes and physically active individuals, 11 studies measured AEs and general supplementation tolerance, while 30 studies did not.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The absence of reported adverse events in studies that did not measure them indicates that probiotic supplementation is safe.

    “In this position stand, which reviews studies focused on probiotic supplementation in athletes and physically active individuals, 11 studies measured AEs and general supplementation tolerance, while 30 studies did not.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The PubMed search terms used capture the relevant literature on probiotics in athletes.

    “A PubMed search conducted in October 2019 yielded the following listings for various combinations of key terms: probiotic and athlete, n = 145; probiotic and rodent, n = 3407; probiotic and diabetes, n = 844; probiotic and child, n = 2930; probiotic and elderly, n = 2257.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The classical pathway enzymes phosphotransbutyrylase and butyrate kinase convert butyryl-CoA to butyrate and coenzyme A with concomitant formation of ATP.

    “In the classical pathway, the enzymes phosphotransbutyrylase and butyrate kinase convert butyryl-CoA to butyrate and coenzyme A with concomitant formation of ATP.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The gut-brain axis is a bidirectional pathway via the neural, endocrine, and immune systems.

    “The gut-brain axis is a bidirectional pathway via the neural, endocrine, and immune systems.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Choline is converted into acetylcholine via the enzyme choline acetyltransferase.

    “Choline is converted into acetylcholine via the enzyme choline acetyltransferase.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Findings from animal models of probiotic supplementation are indicative of effects in humans.

    “Several animal studies have been conducted with promising results.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The outcome measures used in the cited studies are valid and reliable for assessing probiotic effects on athletic performance and health.

    “The difficulty in interpreting the studies is illustrated by variations in clinical outcome measures and most importantly, as probiotic benefits are strain-specific, by different strains used in these studies.”
12 of 12

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

7 of 7

Citations

Cites

Show all 291 references

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. MetchnikoffE The prolongated of life; optimistic studies1908 New York G.P. Putnam’s Son
  2. CrampTBroadEMartinDMeyerBJEffects of preexercise carbohydrate ingestion on mountain bike performanceMed Sci Sports Exerc16022004 36 1609
  3. NazemianVShadnoushMManahejiHZaringhalamJProbiotics and inflammatory pain: a literature review studyMiddle East J Rehab Health20163 e36087
  4. AghaeeMKhosraviNHanachiPKordiMRAghaeeREffect of probiotic supplement on immune response in male athletesQom Univ Med Sci20147 27 33
  5. Narimani-Rad et al. Indian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Life Sciences (Online) An Open Access Online International Journal Available at www.cibtech.org/sp.ed/jls/2014/03/jls.htm. 2014;4(S3):231–5. ISSN: 2231–6345.
  6. NicolaSMognaLAllesinaSBarbaMDeiddaFLorenziniPRaiteriEStrozziGMognaGInteraction between probiotics and human immune cells. The prospective anti-inflammatory activity of Bifidobacterium breve BRO3Agro Food Ind Hi-Tech201021 9 13
  7. Brennan C.J.; Axelrod C.; Paul D.; Hull M.; Kirwan J.P. Effects of a novel probiotic on exercise-induced gut permeability and microbiota in endurance athletes (abstract). In proceedings of American College of Sports Medicine Minneapolis MN.
  8. BermonSPetrizBKajenieneAPrestesJCastellLFrancoOLThe microbiota: an exercise immunology perspectiveExerc Immunol Rev201521 70 79 25825908 25825908
  9. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and World Health Organization Joint FAO/WHO working group report on drafting guidelines fro the evaluation of probiotics in food2002
  10. ANVISA-Ministry of Health Technical Regulation of Bioeactive and Probiotic Substances Isolated with Allegations of Functional or Health Properties2008

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 271

Metadata

Authors
Jäger, R., Mohr, A. E., Carpenter, K. C., Kerksick, C. M., Purpura, M., Moussa, A., Townsend, J. R., Lamprecht, M., West, N. P., Black, K., Gleeson, M., Pyne, D. B., Wells, S. D., Arent, S. M., Smith-Ryan, A. E., Kreider, R. B., Campbell, B. I., Bannock, L., Scheiman, J., Wissent, C. J., Pane, M., Kalman, D. S., Pugh, J. N., ter Haar, J. A., & Antonio, J.
Affiliations
  • Increnovo LLC (United States) (US)
  • Arizona State University (US)
  • Novita Healthcare (Australia) (AU)
  • Lindenwood University (US)
  • University of Münster (DE)
  • Lipscomb University (US)
  • University of Graz (AT)
  • Griffith University (AU)
  • University of Otago (NZ)
  • Loughborough University (GB)
  • University of Canberra (AU)
  • WGI
  • University of South Carolina (US)
  • Applied Physiology Laboratory, Department of Exercise and Sport Science
  • Texas A&M University (US)
  • University of South Florida (US)
  • Institute of Performance Nutrition
  • Fitbiomics, Inc
  • Jamieson Wellness Inc
  • Bioloab Research
  • Nutrasource (CA)
  • Liverpool John Moores University (GB)
  • International Probiotic Association
  • Exercise and Sport Science
Corresponding author
Jäger, Ralf
Venue
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
Published
2019-01-15
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
62-62
ISSN
1550-2783 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2996536203
Cited by
277
References
291
Citations by year
2026: 40 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 28
FWCI
2.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Liverpool John Moores University (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Rutgers University Community Repository (Rutgers University) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Loughborough University Research Repository (Loughborough University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
Keywords
probiotics, probiotic supplementation, athletes, gut microbiota, immune function, upper respiratory tract infection, intestinal barrier, intestinal permeability, exercise-induced inflammation, muscle damage recovery, nutrient absorption, sports nutrition, post-exercise recovery, heat stress, training load, immune depression, respiratory infections
MeSH terms
Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Body Composition, Humans, Societies, Medical, Exercise, Probiotics, Athletic Performance, Athletes, Sports Nutritional Sciences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-08, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-08 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review