The DOI matches its Crossref record; 288 of the 291 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 5 of the 197 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics
Open accessAbstract
Position statement: The International Society of Sports Nutrition (ISSN) provides an objective and critical review of the mechanisms and use of probiotic supplementation to optimize the health, performance, and recovery of athletes. Based on the current available literature, the conclusions of the ISSN are as follows: 1)Probiotics are live microorganisms that, when administered in adequate amounts, confer a health benefit on the host (FAO/WHO).2)Probiotic administration has been linked to a multitude of health benefits, with gut and immune health being the most researched applications.3)Despite the existence of shared, core mechanisms for probiotic function, health benefits of probiotics are strain- and dose-dependent.4)Athletes have varying gut microbiota compositions that appear to reflect the activity level of the host in comparison to sedentary people, with the differences linked primarily to the volume of exercise and amount of protein consumption. Whether differences in gut microbiota composition affect probiotic efficacy is unknown.5)The main function of the gut is to digest food and absorb nutrients. In athletic populations, certain probiotics strains can increase absorption of key nutrients such as amino acids from protein, and affect the pharmacology and physiological properties of multiple food components.6)Immune depression in athletes worsens with excessive training load, psychological stress, disturbed sleep, and environmental extremes, all of which can contribute to an increased risk of respiratory tract infections. In certain situations, including exposure to crowds, foreign travel and poor hygiene at home, and training or competition venues, athletes' exposure to pathogens may be elevated leading to increased rates of infections. Approximately 70% of the immune system is located in the gut and probiotic supplementation has been shown to promote a healthy immune response. In an athletic population, specific probiotic strains can reduce the number of episodes, severity and duration of upper respiratory tract infections.7)Intense, prolonged exercise, especially in the heat, has been shown to increase gut permeability which potentially can result in systemic toxemia. Specific probiotic strains can improve the integrity of the gut-barrier function in athletes.8)Administration of selected anti-inflammatory probiotic strains have been linked to improved recovery from muscle-damaging exercise.9)The minimal effective dose and method of administration (potency per serving, single vs. split dose, delivery form) of a specific probiotic strain depends on validation studies for this particular strain. Products that contain probiotics must include the genus, species, and strain of each live microorganism on its label as well as the total estimated quantity of each probiotic strain at the end of the product's shelf life, as measured by colony forming units (CFU) or live cells.10)Preclinical and early human research has shown potential probiotic benefits relevant to an athletic population that include improved body composition and lean body mass, normalizing age-related declines in testosterone levels, reductions in cortisol levels indicating improved responses to a physical or mental stressor, reduction of exercise-induced lactate, and increased neurotransmitter synthesis, cognition and mood. However, these potential benefits require validation in more rigorous human studies and in an athletic population.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This ISSN position stand critically reviews probiotic supplementation for athletes and concludes that benefits are strain- and dose-dependent, with the strongest evidence for immune and gut health and mixed evidence for performance. Specific strains may reduce upper respiratory tract infection episodes/severity and improve recovery, but more rigorous athlete studies are needed.
Key findings
- Of 24 studies assessing athletic performance, 17 reported a null effect and 7 reported significant improvement; single-strain probiotics produced a significant aerobic performance benefit in only one study, while multi-strain results were mixed.
- Of 22 studies assessing immune outcomes, 14 reported significant improvement and 8 reported no effects. In 465 active individuals, daily *B. animalis* ssp. *lactis* Bl-04 for 150 days was associated with a 27% reduction in risk of any URTI episode; a double-strain probiotic produced a 19% decrease that was not statistically significant, and both probiotic groups showed a ~0.8-month delay in time to illness.
- Of 10 studies assessing GI benefit, the majority reported no effect, but four reported positive results, including decreased zonulin, decreased endotoxin, reduced intestinal hyperpermeability, and shorter duration of GI-symptom episodes.
- Safety data were limited: 11 studies measured adverse events and general supplementation tolerance, while 30 did not; supplementation was generally well tolerated, with one instance of mild GI symptoms (5 episodes) reported in 22 active individuals taking a multi-strain probiotic.
Methods
- Design: International Society of Sports Nutrition position stand providing an objective and critical review of mechanisms and use of probiotic supplementation to optimize athlete health, performance, and recovery.
- Data: Review of studies in athletes and physically active individuals, including performance, immune, and GI outcomes; doses and durations varied widely, and a PubMed search in October 2019 yielded 145 listings for “probiotic and athlete” versus 3407 for “probiotic and rodent.”
- Analysis: Narrative synthesis of the available literature; no meta-analysis or pooled effect estimates are reported.
Limitations
- The paper states there is no clear set of recommendations or guidelines on probiotic use for athletes; effects are strain- and dose-specific, and studies vary considerably in species/strains, duration, dosage, and outcome measures, making comparison difficult.
- The paper states there are a small number of studies with substantial variation in experimental approaches, dependent measures, and outcomes; most studies do not control for previous physical activity, long-term effects are unclear because most supplementation periods were 4–16 weeks, and sex differences and small sample sizes require further study.
- The paper states adverse events are often not well recorded in nutritional studies, including probiotics (11 studies measured AEs; 30 did not); evident from the text, this is a narrative position stand rather than a systematic review or meta-analysis, so it does not provide formal risk-of-bias assessment or pooled effect estimates.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Figures


Verification
Claims the paper makes
143 Not checked yet · 51 No basis given · 47 Own interpretation · 9 Own result · 4 Partly supported · 1 Supported · 1 Own method · accuracy not yet measured
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“All common probiotic species are considered safe for the general population by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), although this definition does not provide guidance on the increasing use of probiotics in people with medical conditions.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Safety and health
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [211] de Simone Claudio The Unregulated Probiotic Market Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology 2019 17 5 809 817 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.01.018 29378309 source
The Safety of Probiotics section states that EFSA considers all common probiotic species safe for the general population. It also says that this designation does not provide guidance for their increasing use in people with medical conditions. (LLM, conf=0.95)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Currently, there are more studies showing a benefit for multi-strain probiotics in relation to performance measures compared to single-strain probiotics.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Benefits of probiotic supplementation in athletes
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Null findings were similarly reported in several studies investigating the effects of multi-strain probiotics on aerobic performance.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Benefits of probiotic supplementation in athletes
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The effect of probiotic supplementation on body composition has been mixed and requires further research.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Benefits of probiotic supplementation in athletes
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The single strain interventions used in these five studies did not produce an aerobic performance benefit.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Benefits of probiotic supplementation in athletes
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [57] Cox AJ Pyne DB Saunders PU Fricker PA Oral administration of the probiotic Lactobacillus fermentum VRI-003 and mucosal immunity in endurance athletes Br J Sports Med 2010 44 222 226 10.1136/bjsm.2007.044628 18272539 source
- Not checked yetcites [61] West NP Pyne DB Cripps AW Hopkins WG Eskesen DC Jairath A Christophersen CT Conlon MA Fricker PA Lactobacillus fermentum (PCC(R)) supplementation and gastrointestinal and respiratory-tract illness symptoms: a randomised control trial in athletes Nutr J 2011 10 30 10.1186/1475-2891-10-30 21477383 PMC3083335 source
- Not checked yetcites [67] Sashihara T Nagata M Mori T Ikegami S Gotoh M Okubo K Uchida M Itoh H Effects of Lactobacillus gasseri OLL2809 and alpha-lactalbumin on university-student athletes: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 2013 38 1228 1235 10.1139/apnm-2012-0490 24195623 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Research specifically designed to investigate the effect of probiotic supplementation on performance has been less common and overall the results are mixed.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Benefits of probiotic supplementation in athletes
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The majority of studies that have investigated the potential benefits of probiotics on URTIs have been conducted in endurance athletes with generally high training loads.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Benefits of probiotic supplementation in athletes
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Several studies that assessed similar outcomes did not report significant effects from probiotic supplementation compared to placebo.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Benefits of probiotic supplementation in athletes
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Of the ten studies that assessed GI benefit in athletes and physically active individuals, the majority reported no effect.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Benefits of probiotic supplementation in athletes
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Of the 11 studies, a general consensus was made to conclude that probiotic supplementation was generally well tolerated with a very low level of adverse health effects.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Safety and health
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- It may state two separate claims as one. 90
- Probably not a substantial claim. 74
- The quote only partly states this claim. 5
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“In competitive cyclists, West et al. [61] reported reduced severity of self-reported symptoms of lower respiratory illness and use of cold and flu medication over an 11-week winter training period with L. fermentum (PCC®) compared to placebo. Interestingly, this effect was only noted in males and not females.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Benefits of probiotic supplementation in athletes
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [61] West NP Pyne DB Cripps AW Hopkins WG Eskesen DC Jairath A Christophersen CT Conlon MA Fricker PA Lactobacillus fermentum (PCC(R)) supplementation and gastrointestinal and respiratory-tract illness symptoms: a randomised control trial in athletes Nutr J 2011 10 30 10.1186/1475-2891-10-30 21477383 PMC3083335 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Obesity and a high fat/high calorie diet can alter gut bacteria and intestinal wall permeability, leading to the passage of LPS from within the gut lumen into the circulation (metabolic endotoxemia), where it initiates systemic inflammation [258].”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Future directions
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [258] Tremellen K McPhee N Pearce K Metabolic endotoxaemia related inflammation is associated with hypogonadism in overweight men Basic Clin Androl 2017 27 5 10.1186/s12610-017-0049-8 28286655 PMC5341351 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Background states that obesity and fatty-food consumption are associated with reduced intestinal barrier integrity, allowing gut-derived endotoxin into circulation and contributing to low-grade inflammation. It does not say that obesity or diet alters gut bacteria, specifically address a high-calorie diet, or establish the full sequence as causal; the Conclusions describe the endotoxin-to-inflammation link as a possibility. Page numbers were not provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Endotoxin can reduce testosterone production by the testes, both by direct inhibition of Leydig cell steroidogenic pathways and indirectly by reducing pituitary luteinizing hormone drive and sperm production [259].”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Future directions
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [259] Tremellen K McPhee N Pearce K Benson S Schedlowski M Engler H Endotoxin-initiated inflammation reduces testosterone production in men of reproductive age Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2018 314 E206 E213 10.1152/ajpendo.00279.2017 29183872 PMC5899218 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion reports that endotoxin inhibits Leydig-cell steroidogenic pathways and that animal studies found reduced LH pulses and pituitary drive. It also says neither study in men found evidence of reduced LH drive. The paper does not establish reduced sperm production as an indirect mechanism of reduced testosterone production. (LLM, conf=0.86)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“These authors concluded that the gut microbiota acts as an endocrine organ, secreting neurotransmitters such as serotonin and dopamine, thereby controlling the hypothalamic-pituitary axis in athletes.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Future directions
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [280] Clark A Mach N Exercise-induced stress behavior, gut-microbiota-brain axis and diet: a systematic review for athletes J Int Soc Sports Nutr 2016 13 43 10.1186/s12970-016-0155-6 27924137 PMC5121944 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Abstract describes the microbiota as acting like an endocrine organ, with serotonin and dopamine as examples, but says it *may* control the HPA axis in athletes. The main-text section on hormone release says its role in exercise-induced stress adaptation remains unknown. The citing sentence overstates this tentative conclusion as established control. (LLM, conf=0.88)
plaindirect- Asserted: fails — The authors may not put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Of the 24 studies that assessed some metric of athletic performance, 17 reported a null effect, while 7 reported significant improvement.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Benefits of probiotic supplementation in athletes
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While there are some encouraging results, a large majority of studies have found no effect on aerobic performance.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Benefits of probiotic supplementation in athletes
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Of the 22 studies reviewed in this Position Stand that assessed the effect of probiotics on outcomes related to the immune system, 14 reported significant improvement, whereas 8 reported no effects.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Benefits of probiotic supplementation in athletes
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“This latter group included significantly decreased concentrations of zonulin [63] and endotoxin [77], as well as intestinal hyperpermeability [132] and duration of GI-symptom episode.”
- Also stated in: § Benefits of probiotic supplementation in athletes · plain
“Positive results reported included decreases in concentrations of zonulin and endotoxin, intestinal hyperpermeability and duration of GI-symptom episodes.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Benefits of probiotic supplementation in athletes
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [63] Lamprecht M Bogner S Schippinger G Steinbauer K Fankhauser F Hallstroem S Schuetz B Greilberger JF Probiotic supplementation affects markers of intestinal barrier, oxidation, and inflammation in trained men; a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial J Int Soc Sports Nutr 2012 9 45 10.1186/1550-2783-9-45 22992437 PMC3465223 source
- Not checked yetcites [77] Roberts Justin Suckling Craig Peedle Georgia Murphy Joseph Dawkins Tony Roberts Michael An Exploratory Investigation of Endotoxin Levels in Novice Long Distance Triathletes, and the Effects of a Multi-Strain Probiotic/Prebiotic, Antioxidant Intervention Nutrients 2016 8 11 733 10.3390/nu8110733 PMC5133117 27869661 source
- Not checked yetcites [132] Brennan, C.J.; Axelrod, C.; Paul, D.; Hull, M.; Kirwan, J.P. Effects of a novel probiotic on exercise-induced gut permeability and microbiota in endurance athletes (abstract). In proceedings of American College of Sports Medicine, Minneapolis, MN.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § Benefits of probiotic supplementation in athletes · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In this position stand, which reviews studies focused on probiotic supplementation in athletes and physically active individuals, 11 studies measured AEs and general supplementation tolerance, while 30 studies did not.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Safety and health
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Overall, probiotics have an excellent safety profile with a large majority of clinical trials involving probiotics not giving rise to major safety concerns [213].”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Safety and health
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [213] Sanders ME Akkermans LM Haller D Hammerman C Heimbach J Hormannsperger G Huys G Levy DD Lutgendorff F Mack D Safety assessment of probiotics for human use Gut Microbes 2010 1 164 185 10.4161/gmic.1.3.12127 21327023 PMC3023597 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The current body of research has investigated a wide variety of species/strains, duration of use, and dosages with several different intended purposes (Table 4).”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Regulation
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“| Lactobacillus (n = 35) | 1 × 109 – 10 × 1010 CFU |”
- Also stated in: § Regulation · plain
“| Bifidobacterium (n = 18) | 7 × 107–9.5 × 109 CFU |”
- Also stated in: § Regulation · plain
“| Streptococcus (n = 8) | 5 × 109–4.5 × 1010 CFU |”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Regulation
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The studies included in this position stand are representative of probiotic supplementation in athletes and physically active individuals.
- Also stated in: § Regulation · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In our review, we report a wide range of doses (Table 4), and in several studies the dosage was not reported.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Regulation
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The studies included in this position stand are representative of probiotic supplementation in athletes and physically active individuals.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Similar to the type of probiotic used, the duration of supplementation has also been variable in the studies reviewed (Table 3). The shortest duration lasted 7 days [75, 76] and the longest lasted 150 days [68].”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Regulation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [75] Gill SK Teixeira AM Rosado F Cox M Costa RJ High-dose probiotic supplementation containing Lactobacillus casei for 7 days does not enhance salivary antimicrobial protein responses to exertional heat stress compared with placebo Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab 2016 26 150 160 10.1123/ijsnem.2015-0171 26479711 source
- Not checked yetcites [76] Gill SK Allerton DM Ansley-Robson P Hemmings K Cox M Costa RJ Does short-term high dose probiotic supplementation containing Lactobacillus casei attenuate exertional-heat stress induced Endotoxaemia and Cytokinaemia? Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab 2016 26 268 275 10.1123/ijsnem.2015-0186 26568577 source
- Not checked yetcites [68] West NP Horn PL Pyne DB Gebski VJ Lahtinen SJ Fricker PA Cripps AW Probiotic supplementation for respiratory and gastrointestinal illness symptoms in healthy physically active individuals Clin Nutr 2014 33 581 587 10.1016/j.clnu.2013.10.002 24268677 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The studies included in this position stand are representative of probiotic supplementation in athletes and physically active individuals.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A PubMed search conducted in October 2019 yielded the following listings for various combinations of key terms: probiotic and athlete, n = 145; probiotic and rodent, n = 3407; probiotic and diabetes, n = 844; probiotic and child, n = 2930; probiotic and elderly, n = 2257.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Future directions
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The PubMed search terms used capture the relevant literature on probiotics in athletes.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition, several studies used a combination of species and strains (n = 17), ranging from two up to 14 different species/strains.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Regulation
plainn = 17- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Rests on an assumption: The studies included in this position stand are representative of probiotic supplementation in athletes and physically active individuals.
In the paper
“Despite the existence of shared, core mechanisms for probiotic function, health benefits of probiotics are strain- and dose-dependent.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [10] Pyne DB West NP Cox AJ Cripps AW Probiotics supplementation for athletes - clinical and physiological effects Eur J Sport Sci 2015 15 63 72 10.1080/17461391.2014.971879 25339255 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Athletes have varying gut microbiota compositions that appear to reflect the activity level of the host in comparison to sedentary people, with the differences linked primarily to the volume of exercise and amount of protein consumption.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [15] Bressa C Bailen-Andrino M Perez-Santiago J Gonzalez-Soltero R Perez M Montalvo-Lominchar MG Mate-Munoz JL Dominguez R Moreno D Larrosa M Differences in gut microbiota profile between women with active lifestyle and sedentary women PLoS One 2017 12 e0171352 10.1371/journal.pone.0171352 28187199 PMC5302835 source
- Not checked yetcites [16] Clarke SF Murphy EF O'Sullivan O Lucey AJ Humphreys M Hogan A Hayes P O'Reilly M Jeffery IB Wood-Martin R Exercise and associated dietary extremes impact on gut microbial diversity Gut 1913 2014 63 10.1136/gutjnl-2013-306541 25021423 source
- Not checked yetcites [17] Petersen LM Bautista EJ Nguyen H Hanson BM Chen L Lek SH Sodergren E Weinstock GM Community characteristics of the gut microbiomes of competitive cyclists Microbiome 2017 5 98 10.1186/s40168-017-0320-4 28797298 PMC5553673 source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In thirty-three trained athletes, 12 weeks of winter training supplementation with a multi-species probiotic did not benefit athletic performance; however, the training load (hours per week) was higher in those who supplemented with the probiotic blend vs. the placebo group [78].”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Benefits of probiotic supplementation in athletes
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [78] Strasser Barbara Geiger Daniela Schauer Markus Gostner Johanna Gatterer Hannes Burtscher Martin Fuchs Dietmar Probiotic Supplements Beneficially Affect Tryptophan–Kynurenine Metabolism and Reduce the Incidence of Upper Respiratory Tract Infections in Trained Athletes: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Trial Nutrients 2016 8 11 752 10.3390/nu8110752 PMC5133134 27886064 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Diet is an established modulator of gut microbiota composition, with significant change reported within 24 h of a dietary modification [32].”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Role of diet and exercise on an athlete’s gut microbiome
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [32] David LA Maurice CF Carmody RN Gootenberg DB Button JE Wolfe BE Ling AV Devlin AS Varma Y Fischbach MA Diet rapidly and reproducibly alters the human gut microbiome Nature 2014 505 559 563 10.1038/nature12820 24336217 PMC3957428 source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Probiotics supplementation as an ergogenic aid for performance enhancement requires further investigation and may be indirect via modulation of other systems.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Benefits of probiotic supplementation in athletes
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“However positive results were reported in thirty endurance athletes supplementing with a yogurt drink, either containing Streptococcus thermophilus or Lactobacillus delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus or no probiotics over 30 days during intense aerobic training. There was a significant increase in VO2max and aerobic power in the Cooper aerobic test [45].”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Benefits of probiotic supplementation in athletes
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [45] Salehzadeh K The effects of probiotic yogurt drink on lipid profile, CRP, and record changes in aerobic athletes Life Sci 2015 9 32 37
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The quote only partly states this claim.
In the paper
“Daily supplementation with probiotics reduced the incidence of URTI compared to placebo. In addition, supplementation limited exercise-induced reductions in tryptophan levels, which may reduce the risk of developing an infection.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Benefits of probiotic supplementation in athletes
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [78] Strasser Barbara Geiger Daniela Schauer Markus Gostner Johanna Gatterer Hannes Burtscher Martin Fuchs Dietmar Probiotic Supplements Beneficially Affect Tryptophan–Kynurenine Metabolism and Reduce the Incidence of Upper Respiratory Tract Infections in Trained Athletes: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Trial Nutrients 2016 8 11 752 10.3390/nu8110752 PMC5133134 27886064 source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In a follow up study, 20 g of casein protein co-administered with B. coagulans GBI-30, 6086 (BC30) or a placebo in recreationally-trained individuals for 2 weeks increased recovery and decreased soreness after a muscle-damaging single-leg training bout [43].”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Benefits of probiotic supplementation in athletes
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [43] Jäger Ralf Shields Kevin A. Lowery Ryan P. De Souza Eduardo O. Partl Jeremy M. Hollmer Chase Purpura Martin Wilson Jacob M. ProbioticBacillus coagulansGBI-30, 6086 reduces exercise-induced muscle damage and increases recovery PeerJ 2016 4 e2276 10.7717/peerj.2276 27547577 PMC4963221 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Probiotic supplementation with the post-workout recovery drink yielded greater reductions in body fat and increases in fat free mass after 10 weeks of resistance training than a placebo.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Benefits of probiotic supplementation in athletes
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [103] Toohey JC, Townsend JR, Johnson SB, Toy AM, Vantrease WC, Bender D, Crimi CC, Stowers KL, Ruiz MD, VanDusseldorp TA, et al. Effects of probiotic (Bacillus subtilis) supplementation during offseason resistance training in female division I athletes. J Strength Cond Res. 2018. 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002675. 33105368 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The quote only partly states this claim.
In the paper
“There were no group differences observed between those who took the probiotic and placebo for any measure of strength, performance, or body composition. However, those athletes who did supplement with probiotics had significantly lower serum TNF-α concentrations than the placebo group.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Benefits of probiotic supplementation in athletes
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [83] Townsend Jeremy Bender David Vantrease William Sapp Philip Toy Ann Woods Clint Johnson Kent Effects of Probiotic (Bacillus subtilis DE111) Supplementation on Immune Function, Hormonal Status, and Physical Performance in Division I Baseball Players Sports 2018 6 3 70 10.3390/sports6030070 PMC6162611 30049931 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“For example, a 12-week study on 141 non-elite marathon runners during pollen season supplementing daily with L. rhammnosus GG (LGG) did not find a significant effect on allergic markers [54] or on the incidence of UTRI episodes [55].”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Benefits of probiotic supplementation in athletes
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [54] Moreira A Kekkonen R Korpela R Delgado L Haahtela T Allergy in marathon runners and effect of Lactobacillus GG supplementation on allergic inflammatory markers Respir Med 2007 101 1123 1131 10.1016/j.rmed.2006.11.015 17196811 source
- Not checked yetcites [55] Kekkonen RA Vasankari TJ Vuorimaa T Haahtela T Julkunen I Korpela R The effect of probiotics on respiratory infections and gastrointestinal symptoms during training in marathon runners Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab 2007 17 352 363 10.1123/ijsnem.17.4.352 17962710 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Supplementation with the double-strain probiotic resulted in a 19% decrease of URTI risk, although this was not statistically significant.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Benefits of probiotic supplementation in athletes
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [68] West NP Horn PL Pyne DB Gebski VJ Lahtinen SJ Fricker PA Cripps AW Probiotic supplementation for respiratory and gastrointestinal illness symptoms in healthy physically active individuals Clin Nutr 2014 33 581 587 10.1016/j.clnu.2013.10.002 24268677 source
plaindirectn = 465- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“One month of daily L. acidophilus supplementation significantly increased secretion of interferon (IFN)-γ from T cells in fatigued athletes to levels found in healthy athletes and increased the concentration of IFN-γ in saliva of healthy control athletes.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Benefits of probiotic supplementation in athletes
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [53] Clancy RL Gleeson M Cox A Callister R Dorrington M D'Este C Pang G Pyne D Fricker P Henriksson A Reversal in fatigued athletes of a defect in interferon gamma secretion after administration of Lactobacillus acidophilus Br J Sports Med 2006 40 351 354 10.1136/bjsm.2005.024364 16556792 PMC2577537 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Similarly, Gleeson et al. [60] examined the effects of Lactobacillus casei Shirota during 4 months of winter training in endurance-based recreational athletes and observed a significant reduction in URTIs compared to placebo. In addition, salivary IgA concentration was significantly higher in those consuming the probiotic.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Benefits of probiotic supplementation in athletes
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [60] Gleeson M Bishop NC Oliveira M Tauler P Daily probiotic's (Lactobacillus casei Shirota) reduction of infection incidence in athletes Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab 2011 21 55 64 10.1123/ijsnem.21.1.55 21411836 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Supplementation with the probiotic significantly reduced the length of URTI episodes and lowered the number of symptoms per episode compared to placebo. Moreover, there was a significant increase of CD4+/CD8+ (T helper/T suppressor) cells ratio in the probiotic group.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Benefits of probiotic supplementation in athletes
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [79] Michalickova D Minic R Dikic N Andjelkovic M Kostic-Vucicevic M Stojmenovic T Nikolic I Djordjevic B Lactobacillus helveticus Lafti L10 supplementation reduces respiratory infection duration in a cohort of elite athletes: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 2016 41 782 789 10.1139/apnm-2015-0541 27363733 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Shared, core mechanisms for probiotic function are evident, although some mechanisms may be more narrowly distributed, including those related to immunomodulation [121].”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Benefits of probiotic supplementation in athletes
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [121] Sanders M Merenstein D Merrifield C Hutkins R Probiotics for Human Use Nutr Bull 2019 43 212 225 10.1111/nbu.12334 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The probiotic group had lower incidence of infection-related symptoms compared to placebo, although there was no difference in the severity of the symptoms between the two treatment groups.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Benefits of probiotic supplementation in athletes
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [69] Haywood BA Black KE Baker D McGarvey J Healey P Brown RC Probiotic supplementation reduces the duration and incidence of infections but not severity in elite rugby union players J Sci Med Sport 2014 17 356 360 10.1016/j.jsams.2013.08.004 24045086 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Probiotic supplementation significantly reduced URTI incidence and severity compared to placebo.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Benefits of probiotic supplementation in athletes
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [57] Cox AJ Pyne DB Saunders PU Fricker PA Oral administration of the probiotic Lactobacillus fermentum VRI-003 and mucosal immunity in endurance athletes Br J Sports Med 2010 44 222 226 10.1136/bjsm.2007.044628 18272539 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The quote only partly states this claim.
In the paper
“The probiotic supplementation prevented reduced NK cell activity after strenuous exercise which may enhance resistance against infections.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Benefits of probiotic supplementation in athletes
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [67] Sashihara T Nagata M Mori T Ikegami S Gotoh M Okubo K Uchida M Itoh H Effects of Lactobacillus gasseri OLL2809 and alpha-lactalbumin on university-student athletes: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 2013 38 1228 1235 10.1139/apnm-2012-0490 24195623 source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The quote only partly states this claim.
In the paper
“The GI tract and particularly the gut are quite adaptable and can be targeted to improve the delivery of nutrients during exercise while at the same time alleviating some (or all) of the symptoms [131].”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Benefits of probiotic supplementation in athletes
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [131] Jeukendrup AE Training the gut for athletes Sports Med 2017 47 101 110 10.1007/s40279-017-0690-6 28332114 PMC5371619 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Further, the overall result is not conclusive as four studies reported positive results.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Benefits of probiotic supplementation in athletes
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Athletes may compromise their immune status with high training loads (over-reaching, over-training) which can increase the risk of illness such as URTIs.”
- Also stated in: § Mechanism of action · boosted
“Numerous studies have shown that prolonged intense physical exercise is associated with a transient depression of immune function in athletes.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Benefits of probiotic supplementation in athletes
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [116] Schwellnus M Soligard T Alonso JM Bahr R Clarsen B Dijkstra HP Gabbett TJ Gleeson M Hagglund M Hutchinson MR How much is too much? (part 2) International Olympic Committee consensus statement on load in sport and risk of illness Br J Sports Med 2016 50 1043 1052 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096572 27535991 PMC5013087 source
- Not checked yetcites [199] Gleeson M Bishop NC URI in athletes: are mucosal immunity and cytokine responses key risk factors? Exerc Sport Sci Rev 2013 41 148 153 10.1097/JES.0b013e3182956ead 23792489 source
- Not checked yetcites [200] Walsh NP Recommendations to maintain immune health in athletes Eur J Sport Sci 2018 18 820 831 10.1080/17461391.2018.1449895 29637836 source
boostedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § Mechanism of action · boosted
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“GI problems often occur in endurance athletes and particularly during prolonged events such as cycling, triathlons and marathons [41, 127].”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Benefits of probiotic supplementation in athletes
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [41] de Oliveira EP Burini RC Jeukendrup A Gastrointestinal complaints during exercise: prevalence, etiology, and nutritional recommendations Sports Med 2014 44 Suppl 1 S79 S85 10.1007/s40279-014-0153-2 24791919 PMC4008808 source
- Not checked yetcites [127] Rehrer NJ van Kemenade M Meester W Brouns F Saris WH Gastrointestinal complaints in relation to dietary intake in triathletes Int J Sport Nutr 1992 2 48 59 10.1123/ijsn.2.1.48 1338583 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Lamprecht et al. [63] suggested that the supplemented probiotics may activate the TLR2 signaling pathway resulting in improved intestinal barrier function, thus reducing an athlete’s susceptibility to endotoxemia and associated cytokine production [137].”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Benefits of probiotic supplementation in athletes
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [63] Lamprecht M Bogner S Schippinger G Steinbauer K Fankhauser F Hallstroem S Schuetz B Greilberger JF Probiotic supplementation affects markers of intestinal barrier, oxidation, and inflammation in trained men; a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial J Int Soc Sports Nutr 2012 9 45 10.1186/1550-2783-9-45 22992437 PMC3465223 source
- Not checked yetcites [137] Jeukendrup AE Vet-Joop K Sturk A Stegen JH Senden J Saris WH Wagenmakers AJ Relationship between gastro-intestinal complaints and endotoxaemia, cytokine release and the acute-phase reaction during and after a long-distance triathlon in highly trained men Clin Sci (Lond) 2000 98 47 55 10.1042/cs0980047 10600658 source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The physical up-and down movement of the gut during running could also explain an increase in the frequency of gut symptoms [41].”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Benefits of probiotic supplementation in athletes
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [41] de Oliveira EP Burini RC Jeukendrup A Gastrointestinal complaints during exercise: prevalence, etiology, and nutritional recommendations Sports Med 2014 44 Suppl 1 S79 S85 10.1007/s40279-014-0153-2 24791919 PMC4008808 source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Many of the studies reporting AEs (rarely serious AEs) either do not utilize the appropriate biological sampling and identification techniques or AEs are poorly reported.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Safety and health
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“well-studied probiotic species include Bifidobacterium (ssp. adolescentis, animalis, bifidum, breve, and longum) and Lactobacillus (ssp. acidophilus, casei, fermentum, gasseri, johnsonii, reuteri, paracasei, plantarum, rhamnosus, and salivarius) [211].”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Safety and health
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [211] de Simone Claudio The Unregulated Probiotic Market Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology 2019 17 5 809 817 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.01.018 29378309 source
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Consumption of some probiotic strains may improve intestinal barrier function by modulating tight junction permeability.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Mechanism of action
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Marteau [214] outlined four classes of possible side effects of probiotic use: systemic infections, detrimental metabolic effects, cytokine-mediated immunologic adverse events in susceptible individuals, and transfer of antibiotic resistance genes.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Safety and health
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [214] Marteau P Safety aspects of probiotic products Naringsforskning 2001 45 22 24 10.3402/fnr.v45i0.1785 source
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Moreover the benefits of probiotics are not validated by EFSA, jeopardizing the use of the term probiotic without an approved claim with some exceptions such as in Italy, Czech Republic, and Bulgaria [211].”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Safety and health
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [211] de Simone Claudio The Unregulated Probiotic Market Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology 2019 17 5 809 817 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.01.018 29378309 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, each strain is unique with respect to how it responds to and affects the host.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Mechanism of action
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The QPS list concerns consumption by the general healthy population and does not take into consideration potential risks for vulnerable populations and this is clearly mentioned.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Safety and health
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The general consensus is that probiotic ingestion is safe [221, 222], with large doses well tolerated and failing to exhibit any toxicity [223].”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Safety and health
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [221] Boyle RJ Robins-Browne RM Tang ML Probiotic use in clinical practice: what are the risks? Am J Clin Nutr 2006 83 1256 1264 10.1093/ajcn/83.6.1256 16762934 source
- Not checked yetcites [222] Tapiovaara L Lehtoranta L Poussa T Makivuokko H Korpela R Pitkaranta A Absence of adverse events in healthy individuals using probiotics--analysis of six randomised studies by one study group Benefic Microbes 2016 7 161 169 10.3920/BM2015.0096 26689224 source
- Not checked yetcites [223] Larsen CN Nielsen S Kaestel P Brockmann E Bennedsen M Christensen HR Eskesen DC Jacobsen BL Michaelsen KF Dose-response study of probiotic bacteria Bifidobacterium animalis subsp lactis BB-12 and Lactobacillus paracasei subsp paracasei CRL-341 in healthy young adults Eur J Clin Nutr 2006 60 1284 1293 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602450 16721394 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Probiotics can potentially modulate intestinal permeability and health of the cells of the gut lining improving nutrient absorption including minerals, peptides, and amino acids by decreasing inflammation and encouraging optimum development of the absorptive area of the villi.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Mechanism of action
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) classifies probiotics individually but has classified many as Generally Recognized As Safe (GRAS), safe for the use in foods and infant products [219].”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Safety and health
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [219] FDA. New Dietary Ingredients Notification Process. Washington; 2016.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Adhesion of probiotics to the intestinal mucosa may be a mechanism for modulation of the immune system.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Mechanism of action
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Probiotics also cause alterations in intestinal mucins that prevent pathogen binding.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Mechanism of action
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“However, most probiotics in commercial use are derived from fermented foods with a long history of safe consumption, or from microbes that may colonize healthy humans [212].”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Safety and health
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [212] World Gastroenterology Organisation. Global Guidelines: Probiotics and Prebiotics. World Gastroentereology Oganisation. Milwaukee; 2017.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“An international consensus statement in 2014 indicated that these are likely to provide general health benefits such as normalization of disturbed gut microbiota, regulation of intestinal transit, competitive exclusion of pathogens, and production of SCFAs [1].”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Safety and health
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [1] Hill C Guarner F Reid G Gibson GR Merenstein DJ Pot B Morelli L Canani RB Flint HJ Salminen S Expert consensus document. The international scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014 11 506 514 10.1038/nrgastro.2014.66 24912386 source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“AEs are often not well recorded in nutritional studies in general and probiotics are no exception to this.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Safety and health
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A systematic literature review of probiotic safety published in 2014 reported that “the overwhelming existing evidence suggests that probiotics are safe” for the general population, and that critically ill patients, postoperative and hospitalized patients and immunocompromised patients were the most at-risk groups wherein AEs occurred [220].”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Safety and health
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [220] Didari T Solki S Mozaffari S Nikfar S Abdollahi M A systematic review of the safety of probiotics Expert Opin Drug Saf 2014 13 227 239 10.1517/14740338.2014.872627 24405164 source
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Caution is warranted for those with serious health conditions, such as severe acute pancreatitis, inflammatory bowel diseases, liver diseases, and HIV.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Safety and health
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There are dozens of bacterial strains that can be considered as probiotics, particularly those that produce lactic acid.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Mechanism of action
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Some of the most common commercially available strains belong to the Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium genera.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Safety and health
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Probiotics have been used safely in foods and dairy products for over a hundred years.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Safety and health
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The mechanisms underlying the beneficial effects of probiotics in athletes are largely unknown but are likely to be multifactorial.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Mechanism of action
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, the mechanisms by which probiotics enhance intestinal barrier function are not sufficiently studied.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Mechanism of action
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“There are two aspects to safety: establishing the adverse effect profile of specific single-strain and multi-strain supplements (i.e., the safety of the strain(s) per se), and ensuring that marketed supplements meet stringent quality standards to ensure the correct strains are present and the product is free of contamination [217].”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Safety and health
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [217] Sanders ME Merenstein DJ Ouwehand AC Reid G Salminen S Cabana MD Paraskevakos G Leyer G Probiotic use in at-risk populations J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) 2016 56 680 686 10.1016/j.japh.2016.07.001 27836128 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Further, probiotics have been studied in vulnerable groups, including infants, patients with severe acute pancreatitis, inflammatory bowel diseases, liver diseases, HIV, and other conditions [213, 216–218] with even greater cause for concern with the small number of products that contain high concentrations of up to 450–900 billion live bacteria per dose [211].”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Safety and health
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [213] Sanders ME Akkermans LM Haller D Hammerman C Heimbach J Hormannsperger G Huys G Levy DD Lutgendorff F Mack D Safety assessment of probiotics for human use Gut Microbes 2010 1 164 185 10.4161/gmic.1.3.12127 21327023 PMC3023597 source
- Not checked yetcites [216] Besselink MG van Santvoort HC Buskens E Boermeester MA van Goor H Timmerman HM Nieuwenhuijs VB Bollen TL van Ramshorst B Witteman BJ Probiotic prophylaxis in predicted severe acute pancreatitis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial Lancet 2008 371 651 659 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60207-X 18279948 source
- Not checked yetcites [217] Sanders ME Merenstein DJ Ouwehand AC Reid G Salminen S Cabana MD Paraskevakos G Leyer G Probiotic use in at-risk populations J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) 2016 56 680 686 10.1016/j.japh.2016.07.001 27836128 source
- Not checked yetcites [218] Vallabhaneni S, Walker TA, Lockhart SR, Ng D, Chiller T, Melchreit R, Brandt ME, Smith RM. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, see https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6406a6.htm.
- Not checked yetcites [211] de Simone Claudio The Unregulated Probiotic Market Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology 2019 17 5 809 817 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.01.018 29378309 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Going beyond history of safe use, since 2007 the EFSA lists species presumed safe for human consumption under the “Qualified Presumption of Safety” (QPS) concept.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Safety and health
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Under Japanese regulations, probiotic products are in a distinct category of foods known as Foods for Specific Health Uses (FOSHU). For probiotic food products, efficacy claims are prohibited on the labeling.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Regulation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [231] Amagase H Current marketplace for probiotics: a Japanese perspective Clin Infect Dis 2008 46 Suppl 2 S73 S75 10.1086/523338 18181727 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Additionally, safety assessment of the probiotic strain should at a minimum determine: 1) patterns of antimicrobial drug resistance, 2) metabolic activities, 3) side effects noted in humans during clinical trials and after marketing, 4) toxin production and hemolytic potential if the probiotic strain is known to possess those properties, and 5) lack of infectivity in animal studies [226].”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Regulation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [226] Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and World Health Organization Joint FAO/WHO working group report on drafting guidelines fro the evaluation of probiotics in food 2002
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The FDA has recently agreed that in addition to weight, probiotic amounts can also be labelled in CFU.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Regulation
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Labeling probiotic quantity by weight is not meaningful because this measure does not indicate the viability of the microorganisms in the product throughout shelf life. To the contrary, CFU are more representative of the quantity of viable microorganisms and gives consumers and healthcare professionals accurate information.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Regulation
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In 2001, the FAO/WHO held the Expert Consultation on Evaluation of Health and Nutritional Properties of Probiotics, to develop standardized guidelines for evaluating probiotics in food that could lead to the substantiation of health claims [226].”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Regulation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [226] Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and World Health Organization Joint FAO/WHO working group report on drafting guidelines fro the evaluation of probiotics in food 2002
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“In January 2017, the Council for Responsible Nutrition (CRN) and the International Probiotics Association (IPA) announced the development of scientifically-based best practices manufacturing guidelines for the labeling, storing, and stability testing of dietary supplements and functional foods containing probiotics [235].”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Regulation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [235] Giordano-Schaefer, J.; Ruthsatz, M.; Schneider, H. Overcoming distinctive regulatory barriers for the development of medical foods. Availabe online: https://www.raps.org/regulatory-focus%E2%84%A2/news-articles/2017/10/overcoming-distinctive-regulatory-barriers-for-the-development-of-medical-foods (Accessed on Oct 2017).
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Health Canada uses a pre-market approval process for non-food like applications such as capsules, tablets, softgels and powders which requires companies to acquire a Natural Product Number (NPN) prior to bringing to market [3].”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Regulation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [3] de Vrese Michael Schrezenmeir J. Probiotics, Prebiotics, and Synbiotics Food Biotechnology 2008 Berlin, Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 1 66
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“While rigorous scrutiny of product claims is apparent, there appears to be little regulation of the manufacturing process and almost no post-marketing regulatory follow-up [233].”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Regulation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [233] Kolacek S Hojsak I Berni Canani R Guarino A Indrio F Orel R Pot B Shamir R Szajewska H Vandenplas Y Commercial probiotic products: a call for improved quality control. A position paper by the ESPGHAN working Group for Probiotics and Prebiotics J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2017 65 117 124 10.1097/MPG.0000000000001603 28644359 source
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The effects of probiotics are strain specific, and therefore, strain identity is important to link to a specific health effect as well as to enable accurate surveillance and epidemiological studies.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Regulation
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“From the examples provided, it is apparent that the current approach to regulation is inadequate and can lead to problems of quality, safety, and claim validity in commercial probiotic products used in a medical context, including those used in vulnerable populations [233].”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Regulation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [233] Kolacek S Hojsak I Berni Canani R Guarino A Indrio F Orel R Pot B Shamir R Szajewska H Vandenplas Y Commercial probiotic products: a call for improved quality control. A position paper by the ESPGHAN working Group for Probiotics and Prebiotics J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2017 65 117 124 10.1097/MPG.0000000000001603 28644359 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Unfortunately, government regulatory organizations are highly varied across national borders and jurisdictions in regulation of probiotics, making uniform recommendations difficult.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Regulation
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In two reviews related to dietary supplementation in athletes, dosing regimens were reported in the range between 1 × 109 to 4 × 1010 CFU [10, 40].”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Regulation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [10] Pyne DB West NP Cox AJ Cripps AW Probiotics supplementation for athletes - clinical and physiological effects Eur J Sport Sci 2015 15 63 72 10.1080/17461391.2014.971879 25339255 source
- Not checked yetcites [40] Rawson ES Miles MP Larson-Meyer DE Dietary supplements for health, adaptation, and recovery in athletes Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab 2018 28 188 199 10.1123/ijsnem.2017-0340 29345167 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These guidelines were designed to facilitate transparency and consistency in the probiotic sector.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Regulation
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Currently there is no clear set of recommendation or guidelines on probiotic use for athletes.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Regulation
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The regulation of probiotics differs between countries as there is no universally agreed framework.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Regulation
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“With the interruption of probiotic intake, there is a reduction in the microorganism administered in the colon, and with 8 days of supplementation discontinuation, the probiotic is no longer detectable in the gut [236].”
- Also stated in: § Future directions · plain
“Further, with the interruption of probiotic intake, there is a reduction in the microorganism administered in the colon, and with 8 days of supplementation discontinuation, the probiotic is no longer detectable in the gut [236].”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Regulation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [236] Kullen MJ Amann MM O'Shaughnessy MJ O'Sullivan DJ Busta FF Brady LJ Differentiation of ingested and endogenous bifidobacteria by DNA fingerprinting demonstrates the survival of an unmodified strain in the gastrointestinal tract of humans J Nutr 1997 127 89 94 10.1093/jn/127.1.89 9040550 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § Future directions · plain
In the paper
“In the European Union, probiotics and food supplements are regulated under the Food Products Directive and Regulation (regulation 178/2002/EC; directive 2000/13/EU). All health claims for probiotics have to be authorized by EFSA which has issued a list of microbial cultures that have a Qualified Presumption of Safety [232]”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Regulation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [232] European Food Standards Agency. Qualified Presumption of Safety. Available from: http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/topics/topic/qualified-presumption-safety-qps. Access date: 10 Aug 2018.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A key element of the guidelines is labelling probiotic products in CFU, the scientifically accepted unit of measure for probiotics and used to report probiotic quantity in many studies conducted to assess the safety or benefits of probiotics.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Regulation
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“So far, EFSA has rejected all submitted health claims for probiotics.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Regulation
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Further, dietary supplements are required to comply with Good Manufacturing Practice guidelines, but these do not extend to testing quality or efficacy [233].”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Regulation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [233] Kolacek S Hojsak I Berni Canani R Guarino A Indrio F Orel R Pot B Shamir R Szajewska H Vandenplas Y Commercial probiotic products: a call for improved quality control. A position paper by the ESPGHAN working Group for Probiotics and Prebiotics J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2017 65 117 124 10.1097/MPG.0000000000001603 28644359 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Consistent with scientific literature, CFU are commonly used on probiotic product labels in many jurisdictions around the world to help consumers and healthcare professionals identify products providing probiotics in amounts shown to have benefit.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Regulation
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Japan is viewed by many to be a global market leader given that probiotics are available as both foods and drugs [230], and was the first global jurisdiction to implement a regulatory system for functional foods and nutraceuticals in 1991.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Regulation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [230] Arora M Baldi A Regulatory categories of probiotics across the globe: a review representing existing and recommended categorization Indian J Med Microbiol 2015 33 Suppl 2 10 10.4103/0255-0857.150868 25657150 source
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In Brazil, probiotics are considered as functional foods, and considered to be different from food. But legislation asks for safety and efficacy demonstration of food products and hence all these products must be registered and approved by a health authority called National Health Surveillance Agency Brazil (ANVISA) [230].”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Regulation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [230] Arora M Baldi A Regulatory categories of probiotics across the globe: a review representing existing and recommended categorization Indian J Med Microbiol 2015 33 Suppl 2 10 10.4103/0255-0857.150868 25657150 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Health Canada has provided a Natural Health Product monograph that includes dosage form(s), use(s) or purpose(s) recommended as well as minimum quantities”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Regulation
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Coqueiro et al. [188] noted that in clinical practice probiotic supplementation should be implemented for at least 14 days prior to competition or important events for the athlete.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Regulation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [188] Coqueiro AY de Oliveira Garcia AB Rogero MM Tirapegui J Probiotic supplementation in sports and physical exercise: does it present any ergogenic effect? Nutr Health 2017 23 239 249 10.1177/0260106017721000 29214927 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In Canada, probiotics have two modes of sale on the market, Natural and Non-Prescription Health Products Directorate (NNHPD) and Food Directorate [3, 228].”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Regulation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [3] de Vrese Michael Schrezenmeir J. Probiotics, Prebiotics, and Synbiotics Food Biotechnology 2008 Berlin, Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 1 66
- Not checked yetcites [228] Zorzela L Ardestani SK McFarland LV Vohra S Is there a role for modified probiotics as beneficial microbes: a systematic review of the literature Benefic Microbes 2017 8 739 754 10.3920/BM2017.0032 28884589 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Many probiotics are sold as dietary supplements, which do not require FDA approval before they are marketed. Dietary supplement labels are permitted to make claims about how the product affects the structure or function of the body without FDA approval, but they cannot make health claims (claims that the product reduces the risk of a disease) without the FDA’s approval [234].”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Regulation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [234] NIH. Probiotics: In Depth. https://nccih.nih.gov/health/probiotics/introduction.htm. 2016.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In a 2018 consensus statement, the International Olympic Committee noted moderate support for probiotic use in athletes with a daily dose of 1 × 1010 live bacteria [5].”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Regulation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [5] Maughan RJ Burke LM Dvorak J Larson-Meyer DE Peeling P Phillips SM Rawson ES Walsh NP Garthe I Geyer H IOC consensus statement: dietary supplements and the high-performance athlete Br J Sports Med 2018 52 439 455 10.1136/bjsports-2018-099027 29540367 PMC5867441 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“The TWK10 group had significantly higher endurance performance and glucose content in a maximal treadmill running test compared to the placebo group (P < 0.05), indicating that TWK10 supplementation may be beneficial to energy harvest.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Future directions
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [85] Huang WC Hsu YJ Li H Kan NW Chen YM Lin JS Hsu TK Tsai TY Chiu YS Huang CC Effect of Lactobacillus Plantarum TWK10 on improving endurance performance in humans Chin J Phys 2018 61 163 170 10.4077/CJP.2018.BAH587 29962176 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These novel findings suggest a potential impact for microbe therapy in obese and/or aging athletes by imparting hormonal and gonadal features of reproductive fitness typical of much younger healthy individuals.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Future directions
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Together, these studies suggest a role in which certain probiotics may enhance energy harvesting, and have health-promotion, performance-improvement, and anti-fatigue effects.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Future directions
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Weight loss and physical activity seem to improve these symptoms [260].”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Future directions
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [260] De Lorenzo Antonino Noce Annalisa Moriconi Eleonora Rampello Tiziana Marrone Giulia Di Daniele Nicola Rovella Valentina MOSH Syndrome (Male Obesity Secondary Hypogonadism): Clinical Assessment and Possible Therapeutic Approaches Nutrients 2018 10 4 474 10.3390/nu10040474 PMC5946259 29649106 source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Probiotic supplementation, both with and without resistance training, can decrease levels of body weight and fat mass in overweight and obese individuals, as well as female athletes [103, 241, 242].”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Future directions
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [103] Toohey JC, Townsend JR, Johnson SB, Toy AM, Vantrease WC, Bender D, Crimi CC, Stowers KL, Ruiz MD, VanDusseldorp TA, et al. Effects of probiotic (Bacillus subtilis) supplementation during offseason resistance training in female division I athletes. J Strength Cond Res. 2018. 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002675. 33105368 source
- Not checked yetcites [241] Kim J Yun JM Kim MK Kwon O Cho B Lactobacillus gasseri BNR17 supplementation reduces the visceral fat accumulation and waist circumference in obese adults: a randomized, double-blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial J Med Food 2018 21 454 461 10.1089/jmf.2017.3937 29688793 source
- Not checked yetcites [242] Sanchez M Darimont C Drapeau V Emady-Azar S Lepage M Rezzonico E Ngom-Bru C Berger B Philippe L Ammon-Zuffrey C Effect of Lactobacillus rhamnosus CGMCC1.3724 supplementation on weight loss and maintenance in obese men and women Br J Nutr 2014 111 1507 1519 10.1017/S0007114513003875 24299712 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The long-term effects of probiotic administration in athletes over several months or years on gut health, immune function and rates of illness are unclear, as in most studies the supplementation period was between 4 to 16 weeks.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Future directions
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“In mice who consumed a probiotic kefir daily over 4 weeks, swimming time-to-exhaustion was significantly longer, forelimb grip strength was higher and serum lactate, ammonia, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), and creatine kinase levels were lower after the swimming test [248].”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Future directions
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [248] Hsu Yi-Ju Huang Wen-Ching Lin Jin-Seng Chen Yi-Ming Ho Shang-Tse Huang Chi-Chang Tung Yu-Tang Kefir Supplementation Modifies Gut Microbiota Composition, Reduces Physical Fatigue, and Improves Exercise Performance in Mice Nutrients 2018 10 7 862 10.3390/nu10070862 PMC6073576 29973525 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Probiotic supplementation may have potential to remove and utilize blood lactate after exercise.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Future directions
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Rests on an assumption: The classical pathway enzymes phosphotransbutyrylase and butyrate kinase convert butyryl-CoA to butyrate and coenzyme A with concomitant formation of ATP.
In the paper
“Piqué et al. (2019) suggested the presence of key structures in the cell or supernatant fractions may confer probiotic properties, mainly through immune-modulation, protection against pathogens, and fortifying the mucosal barrier integrity [261].”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Future directions
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [261] Piqué Núria Berlanga Mercedes Miñana-Galbis David Health Benefits of Heat-Killed (Tyndallized) Probiotics: An Overview International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2019 20 10 2534 10.3390/ijms20102534 PMC6566317 31126033 source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: fails — The authors may not put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Finally, very few studies have evaluated the performance in strength exercises after supplementation with probiotics and this is an important area of sports and physical training to be studied.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Future directions
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In animals, probiotics have been associated with benefits including normalizing age-related drops in testosterone levels [237], increasing neurotransmitter synthesis [238], reducing stress-induced cortisol levels [239], reducing inflammation [100] and improving mood [240].”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Future directions
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [237] Poutahidis T Springer A Levkovich T Qi P Varian BJ Lakritz JR Ibrahim YM Chatzigiagkos A Alm EJ Erdman SE Probiotic microbes sustain youthful serum testosterone levels and testicular size in aging mice PLoS One 2014 9 e84877 10.1371/journal.pone.0084877 24392159 PMC3879365 source
- Not checked yetcites [238] Lyte M Probiotics function mechanistically as delivery vehicles for neuroactive compounds: microbial endocrinology in the design and use of probiotics Bioessays 2011 33 574 581 10.1002/bies.201100024 21732396 source
- Not checked yetcites [239] Bravo JA Forsythe P Chew MV Escaravage E Savignac HM Dinan TG Bienenstock J Cryan JF Ingestion of Lactobacillus strain regulates emotional behavior and central GABA receptor expression in a mouse via the vagus nerve Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011 108 16050 16055 10.1073/pnas.1102999108 21876150 PMC3179073 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The range of oral probiotic supplementation is, approximately, 108–109 CFU per day, however, this value varies in each country [249, 250]”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Future directions
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [249] ANVISA-Ministry of Health Technical Regulation of Bioeactive and Probiotic Substances Isolated with Allegations of Functional or Health Properties 2008
- Not checked yetcites [250] Ministerio della Salute Linee guida su probiotici e prebioticic 2013
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In mice, the microbiota can regulate testicular development and function [251], while androgen deficiency has substantially altered the microbiome [252].”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Future directions
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [251] Al-Asmakh M Stukenborg JB Reda A Anuar F Strand ML Hedin L Pettersson S Soder O The gut microbiota and developmental programming of the testis in mice PLoS One 2014 9 e103809 10.1371/journal.pone.0103809 25118984 PMC4132106 source
- Not checked yetcites [252] Harada N Hanaoka R Horiuchi H Kitakaze T Mitani T Inui H Yamaji R Castration influences intestinal microflora and induces abdominal obesity in high-fat diet-fed mice Sci Rep 2016 6 23001 10.1038/srep23001 26961573 PMC4785334 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Chen and colleagues [92] supplemented male Institute of Cancer Research (ICR) strain mice with L. plantarum TWK10 for 6 weeks. Mice were divided into three groups and daily doses of 0, 2.05 × 108, or 1.03 × 109 CFU were given to each group, respectively.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Future directions
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [92] Chen YM Wei L Chiu YS Hsu YJ Tsai TY Wang MF Huang CC Lactobacillus plantarum TWK10 supplementation improves exercise performance and increases muscle mass in mice Nutrients 2016 8 205 10.3390/nu8040205 27070637 PMC4848674 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“notably, no specific probiotic recommendation has been established for athletes or physical activity practitioners.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Future directions
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“In mice supplemented with L. plantarum TWK10 over 6 weeks, supplementation dose-dependently increased grip strength and endurance swimming time and decreased levels of serum lactate, ammonia, creatine kinase, and glucose after an acute exercise challenge [92].”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Future directions
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [92] Chen YM Wei L Chiu YS Hsu YJ Tsai TY Wang MF Huang CC Lactobacillus plantarum TWK10 supplementation improves exercise performance and increases muscle mass in mice Nutrients 2016 8 205 10.3390/nu8040205 27070637 PMC4848674 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Oral supplementation with selective bacteria holds promise in positively affecting the endocrine system.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Future directions
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Moreover, 6 weeks supplementation of 4 × 109 CFU/live cells of L. fermementum LF16, L. rhamnosus LR06, L. plantarum LP01, and B. longum BL04 improved mood and sleep quality with a reduction in depressive mood state, anger and fatigue [279].”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Future directions
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [279] Marotta A Sarno E Del Casale A Pane M Mogna L Amoruso A Felis GE Fiorio M Effects of probiotics on cognitive reactivity, mood, and sleep quality Front Psychiatry 2019 10 164 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00164 30971965 PMC6445894 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Inflammation has been implicated in probiotic supplementation impacting body fat levels in overweight and obese individuals, as well as athletic populations.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Future directions
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Zhao et al. [281] reported that supplementation of Akkermancia muciniphila in lean mice fed a chow diet for 5 weeks significantly improved markers of low-grade, chronic inflammation via measurement of LPS, and alleviated gains in both body weight and fat mass.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Future directions
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [281] Zhao S Liu W Wang J Shi J Sun Y Wang W Ning G Liu R Hong J Akkermansia muciniphila improves metabolic profiles by reducing inflammation in chow diet-fed mice J Mol Endocrinol 2017 58 1 14 10.1530/JME-16-0054 27821438 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In relation, little is known pertaining to the optimal timing of probiotic intake for improved microbial survival and nutrient absorption.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Future directions
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Interaction between A. muciniphila and inflammatory processes may subsequently impact metabolic health and consequently body composition regulation.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Future directions
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“Increasing plasma levels of choline could improve the production of acetylcholine, increase muscular contraction, and possibly delay fatigue in endurance exercise [282].”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Future directions
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [282] Warber JP Patton JF Tharion WJ Zeisel SH Mello RP Kemnitz CP Lieberman HR The effects of choline supplementation on physical performance Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab 2000 10 170 181 10.1123/ijsnem.10.2.170 10861337 source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Choline is converted into acetylcholine via the enzyme choline acetyltransferase.
In the paper
“Results of this investigation showed that when a probiotic was consumed 30 min before a meal or with a meal, the bacteria survived in high numbers. Conversely, when the probiotic was taken 30 min after a meal, the bacteria did not survive in high numbers.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Future directions
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [287] Tompkins TA Mainville I Arcand Y The impact of meals on a probiotic during transit through a model of the human upper gastrointestinal tract Benefic Microbes 2011 2 295 303 10.3920/BM2011.0022 22146689 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“More recently, a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical and pre-clinical literature on the effects of probiotics on anxiety asserted that probiotics may help reduce anxiety [297].”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Future directions
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [297] Reis DJ Ilardi SS Punt SEW The anxiolytic effect of probiotics: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical and preclinical literature PLoS One 2018 13 e0199041 10.1371/journal.pone.0199041 29924822 PMC6010276 source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There is currently no research in athletes or active individuals, yet increases in plasma choline could (in theory) support increases in acetylcholine and consequently power, and endurance.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Future directions
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Choline is converted into acetylcholine via the enzyme choline acetyltransferase.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Overall, research on probiotics and mood in athletic populations is lacking.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Future directions
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These compositional changes in the gut microbiota may have contributed to the recovery of fatigue and moderation of stress and anxiety through the gut-brain axis.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Future directions
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Rests on an assumption: The gut-brain axis is a bidirectional pathway via the neural, endocrine, and immune systems.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“To date, no such research has been completed in athletic populations to clarify the impact of probiotic supplementation on body composition in athletes.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Future directions
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“In relation to the gut microbiota, CP2305 intake increased the alpha- and beta-diversity, and the compositions of Bifidobacterium and Faecalibacterium.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Future directions
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [271] Sawada Daisuke Kuwano Yuki Tanaka Hiroki Hara Susumu Uchiyama Yoshihide Sugawara Tomonori Fujiwara Shigeru Rokutan Kazuhito Nishida Kensei Daily intake of Lactobacillus gasseri CP2305 relieves fatigue and stress-related symptoms in male university Ekiden runners: A double-blind, randomized, and placebo-controlled clinical trial Journal of Functional Foods 2019 57 465 476 10.1016/j.jff.2019.04.022 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Probiotic supplementation also increased anti-inflammatory factors α-tocopherol and β-sitosterol.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Future directions
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [281] Zhao S Liu W Wang J Shi J Sun Y Wang W Ning G Liu R Hong J Akkermansia muciniphila improves metabolic profiles by reducing inflammation in chow diet-fed mice J Mol Endocrinol 2017 58 1 14 10.1530/JME-16-0054 27821438 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The quote only partly states this claim.
In the paper
“Compared to placebo, supplementation increased the maturation marker of plasmacytoid DC pDC (CD86), responsible for the antiviral response, and decreased the cumulative days of URTI symptoms. Furthermore, ingestion decreased cumulative days of self-reported fatigue.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Future directions
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [262] Komano Y Shimada K Naito H Fukao K Ishihara Y Fujii T Kokubo T Daida H Efficacy of heat-killed Lactococcus lactis JCM 5805 on immunity and fatigue during consecutive high intensity exercise in male athletes: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded trial J Int Soc Sports Nutr 2018 15 39 10.1186/s12970-018-0244-9 30071871 PMC6090876 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In humans, low-grade, chronic inflammation is a marker of many disease states and aspects of the metabolic syndrome.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Future directions
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Cortisol is a steroid hormone released by the adrenal glands in response to stress and increased levels have been related to suppression of the immune system in athletes [288–290].”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Future directions
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [288] He CS Tsai ML Ko MH Chang CK Fang SH Relationships among salivary immunoglobulin a, lactoferrin and cortisol in basketball players during a basketball season Eur J Appl Physiol 2010 110 989 995 10.1007/s00421-010-1574-8 20668874 source
- Not checked yetcites [289] Li TL Lin HC Ko MH Chang CK Fang SH Effects of prolonged intensive training on the resting levels of salivary immunoglobulin a and cortisol in adolescent volleyball players J Sports Med Phys Fitness 2012 52 569 573 22976746
- Not checked yetcites [290] Tsai ML Li TL Chou LW Chang CK Huang SY Fang SH Resting salivary levels of IgA and cortisol are significantly affected during intensive resistance training periods in elite male weightlifters J Strength Cond Res 2012 26 2202 2208 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31823a4246 21997453 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Athletes have varying gut microbiota compositions that appear to reflect the activity level of the host in comparison to sedentary people, with the differences linked primarily to the volume of exercise and amount of protein consumption.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Recommendations > Position of the International Society of Sports Nutrition (ISSN)
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Regular consumption of specific probiotic strains may assist with immune function and may reduce the number of sick days an athlete experiences when training or during competition.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Conclusion
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Studies investigating the effects of probiotics in athletic populations and on sports performance are limited and warrant further investigation.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Conclusion
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Probiotic administration has been linked to a multitude of health benefits, with gut and immune health being the most researched applications.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Recommendations > Position of the International Society of Sports Nutrition (ISSN)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The difficulty in interpreting the studies is illustrated by variations in clinical outcome measures and most importantly, as probiotic benefits are strain-specific, by different strains used in these studies.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Summary
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Intense, prolonged exercise, especially in the heat, has been shown to increase gut permeability which potentially can result in systemic toxemia.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Recommendations > Position of the International Society of Sports Nutrition (ISSN)
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The minimal effective dose and method of administration (potency per serving, single vs. split dose, delivery form) of a specific probiotic strain depends on validation studies for this particular strain.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Recommendations > Position of the International Society of Sports Nutrition (ISSN)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In athletic populations, certain probiotics strains can increase absorption of key nutrients such as amino acids from protein, and affect the pharmacology and physiological properties of multiple food components.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Recommendations > Position of the International Society of Sports Nutrition (ISSN)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, these potential benefits require validation in more rigorous human studies and in an athletic population.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Recommendations > Position of the International Society of Sports Nutrition (ISSN)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Certain probiotic strains may reduce the severity of respiratory infection and GI disturbance when they occur.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Conclusion
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Preclinical and early human research has shown potential probiotic benefits relevant to an athletic population that include improved body composition and lean body mass, normalizing age-related declines in testosterone levels, reductions in cortisol levels indicating improved responses to a physical or mental stressor, reduction of exercise-induced lactate, and increased neurotransmitter synthesis”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Recommendations > Position of the International Society of Sports Nutrition (ISSN)
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Immune depression in athletes worsens with excessive training load, psychological stress, disturbed sleep, and environmental extremes, all of which can contribute to an increased risk of respiratory tract infections.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Recommendations > Position of the International Society of Sports Nutrition (ISSN)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Approximately 70% of the immune system is located in the gut and probiotic supplementation has been shown to promote a healthy immune response.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Recommendations > Position of the International Society of Sports Nutrition (ISSN)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Whether differences in gut microbiota composition affect probiotic efficacy is unknown.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Recommendations > Position of the International Society of Sports Nutrition (ISSN)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Probiotic benefits are strain specific and dose dependent, and include improved gut-barrier function, nutrient absorption, recovery and performance in athletes.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Conclusion
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
Approximately 70% of the immune system is located in the gut.
“Approximately 70% of the immune system is located in the gut”
The paper relies on this without support.
Episodes of illness often occur during heavy exercise training periods, a time when athletes obtain the greatest improvements in fitness.
“Episodes of illness often occur during heavy exercise training periods, a time when athletes obtain the greatest improvements in fitness.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Illness that interrupts individual training sessions may prevent athletes from maximizing the effects of their training program.
“Illness that interrupts individual training sessions may prevent athletes from maximizing the effects of their training program.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Disruption in the GI system can impair the delivery of nutrients, and cause GI symptoms and decreased performance.
“Disruption in the GI system can impair the delivery of nutrients, and cause GI symptoms and decreased performance.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The studies included in this position stand are representative of probiotic supplementation in athletes and physically active individuals.
“In this position stand, which reviews studies focused on probiotic supplementation in athletes and physically active individuals, 11 studies measured AEs and general supplementation tolerance, while 30 studies did not.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The absence of reported adverse events in studies that did not measure them indicates that probiotic supplementation is safe.
“In this position stand, which reviews studies focused on probiotic supplementation in athletes and physically active individuals, 11 studies measured AEs and general supplementation tolerance, while 30 studies did not.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The PubMed search terms used capture the relevant literature on probiotics in athletes.
“A PubMed search conducted in October 2019 yielded the following listings for various combinations of key terms: probiotic and athlete, n = 145; probiotic and rodent, n = 3407; probiotic and diabetes, n = 844; probiotic and child, n = 2930; probiotic and elderly, n = 2257.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The classical pathway enzymes phosphotransbutyrylase and butyrate kinase convert butyryl-CoA to butyrate and coenzyme A with concomitant formation of ATP.
“In the classical pathway, the enzymes phosphotransbutyrylase and butyrate kinase convert butyryl-CoA to butyrate and coenzyme A with concomitant formation of ATP.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The gut-brain axis is a bidirectional pathway via the neural, endocrine, and immune systems.
“The gut-brain axis is a bidirectional pathway via the neural, endocrine, and immune systems.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Choline is converted into acetylcholine via the enzyme choline acetyltransferase.
“Choline is converted into acetylcholine via the enzyme choline acetyltransferase.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Findings from animal models of probiotic supplementation are indicative of effects in humans.
“Several animal studies have been conducted with promising results.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The outcome measures used in the cited studies are valid and reliable for assessing probiotic effects on athletic performance and health.
“The difficulty in interpreting the studies is illustrated by variations in clinical outcome measures and most importantly, as probiotic benefits are strain-specific, by different strains used in these studies.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Thus, modulation of microbiota by means of probiotic/prebiotic supplementation has shown to ameliorate oxidative stress and inflammation and to improve performance in certain athletic populations but more rigorous studies are needed [92,93,94].”
From The 4R’s Framework of Nutritional Strategies for Post-Exercise Recovery: A Review with Emphasis on New Generation of Carbohydrates (2020) · cites this paper as [93]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated major: it would touch a result — a value a result rests on, reported and recomputed p-values on opposite sides of the significance level, two passages that conflict with no sign which is right, or a cited work retracted before this paper was published.
In the paper
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Summary
“L. plantarum TWK10 at 1 × 1010 CFU has been shown to increase endurance performance”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Benefits of probiotic supplementation in athletes
“Huang et al. (2018) [85] | Healthy adults without professional athletic training (n = 16) | 16 M20–40 y | L. plantarum TWK10 1 × 1011 CFUDaily”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
“West et al. (2011) [61] | Competitive cyclists (n = 80) | 64 M / 35 F35 ± 9 and 36 ± 9 y”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Benefits of probiotic supplementation in athletes
Reported 80 · recomputed 99
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Regulation
“| Multi- species/strain (n = 17) | 2 × 109–4.5 × 1010 CFU |”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Benefits of probiotic supplementation in athletes
“L. rhamnosus, L. casei, L. acidophilus, L. plantarum, L. fermentum, B. lactis, B. bifidum, S. thermophilus120 billion CFU daily in total, no information on individual strains500 mg S. boulardi (added during stage 3)”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Benefits of probiotic supplementation in athletes
“Strasser et al. (2016) [78] | Trained athletes (n = 29)”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Benefits of probiotic supplementation in athletes
“In thirty-three trained athletes, 12 weeks of winter training supplementation with a multi-species probiotic did not benefit athletic performance”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Benefits of probiotic supplementation in athletes
“Jäger et al. (2016) [42] | Recreationally-trained individuals(n = 29) | 29 M21.5 ± 2.8 y | B. coagulans GBI-30, 6086 (BC30)”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > References
“42. Jäger Ralf Purpura Martin Stone Jason Turner Stephanie Anzalone Anthony Eimerbrink Micah Pane Marco Amoruso Angela Rowlands David Oliver Jonathan Probiotic Streptococcus thermophilus FP4 and Bifidobacterium breve BR03 Supplementation Attenuates Performance and Range-of-Motion Decrements Following Muscle Damaging Exercise”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Benefits of probiotic supplementation in athletes
“Carbuhn et al. (2018) [86] | Division I collegiate female swimmers (n = 17) | 17 FAge not reported”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Benefits of probiotic supplementation in athletes
“Carbuhn et al. [86] explored the effects of B. longum 35,624 supplementation in 20 female Division I collegiate swimmers”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Future directions
“Increases in fat free mass, however, have only been shown in animal models.”
§ International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics > Introduction > Benefits of probiotic supplementation in athletes
“Probiotic supplementation with the post-workout recovery drink yielded greater reductions in body fat and increases in fat free mass after 10 weeks of resistance training than a placebo.”
Citations
Cites
Diet rapidly and reproducibly alters the human gut microbiome
David, L. A., Maurice, C. F., Carmody, R. N., Gootenberg, D. B., Button, J. E., Wolfe, B. E., Ling, A. V., Devlin, A. S., Varma, Y., Fischbach, M. A., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12820 · Cited by 10,100 · cited 3×
“Protein intake appears to be a strong modulator of the microbiota [20, 32, 34], with whey protein showing some potential benefits that need further study in humans [31, 35].”
BackgroundInfluentialHill (2014) · doi:10.1038/nrgastro.2014.66 · Cited by 9,592
A core gut microbiome in obese and lean twins
Turnbaugh, P. J., Hamady, M., Yatsunenko, T., Cantarel, B. L., Duncan, A., Ley, R. E., Sogin, M. L., Jones, W. J., Roe, B. A., Affourtit, J. P., et al. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07540 · Cited by 7,823
Human gut microbiome viewed across age and geography
Yatsunenko, T., Rey, F. E., Manary, M. J., Trehan, I., Dominguez-Bello, M. G., Contreras, M., Magris, M., Hidalgo, G., Baldassano, R. N., Anokhin, A. P., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11053 · Cited by 7,815
Linking long-term dietary patterns with gut microbial enterotypes
Wu, G. D., Chen, J., Hoffmann, C., Bittinger, K., Chen, Y.-Y., Keilbaugh, S. A., Bewtra, M., Knights, D., Walters, W. A., Knight, R., et al. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1208344 · Cited by 6,513
Gibson, G. R., Hutkins, R., Sanders, M. E., Prescott, S. L., Reimer, R. A., Salminen, S. J., Scott, K., Stanton, C., Swanson, K. S., Cani, P. D., et al. (2017) · Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1038/nrgastro.2017.75 · Cited by 5,634
Gut flora metabolism of phosphatidylcholine promotes cardiovascular disease
Wang, Z., Klipfell, E., Bennett, B. J., Koeth, R., Levison, B. S., DuGar, B., Feldstein, A. E., Britt, E. B., Fu, X., Chung, Y.-M., et al. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09922 · Cited by 5,597
den Besten, G., van Eunen, K., Groen, A. K., Venema, K., Reijngoud, D.-J., & Bakker, B. M. (2013) · Journal of Lipid Research · doi:10.1194/jlr.r036012 · Cited by 5,048 · cited 1×
“butyrate, acetate and propionate) also contribute to plasma cholesterol homeostasis in rodents and humans [184].”
BackgroundBravo, J. A., Forsythe, P., Chew, M. V., Escaravage, E., Savignac, H. M., Dinan, T. G., Bienenstock, J., & Cryan, J. F. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1102999108 · Cited by 3,888
The Neuroendocrinology of Stress: A Never Ending Story
Lightman, S. L. (2008) · Journal of Neuroendocrinology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2826.2008.01711.x · Cited by 3,588
Bacterial Community Variation in Human Body Habitats Across Space and Time
Costello, E. K., Lauber, C. L., Hamady, M., Fierer, N., Gordon, J. I., & Knight, R. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1177486 · Cited by 3,231
Gleeson, M., Bishop, N. C., Stensel, D. J., Lindley, M. R., Mastana, S. S., & Nimmo, M. A. (2011) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri3041 · Cited by 2,470
Self-citationBacteriocins: Developing innate immunity for food
Cotter, P. D., Hill, C., & Ross, R. P. (2005) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1273 · Cited by 2,380
Nasir, O. (2013) · Kidney & Blood Pressure Research · doi:10.1159/000350152 · Cited by 2,331
Short-chain fatty acids in control of body weight and insulin sensitivity
Canfora, E. E., Jocken, J. W., & Blaak, E. E. (2015) · Nature Reviews Endocrinology · doi:10.1038/nrendo.2015.128 · Cited by 2,298
Molecular Analysis of Commensal Host-Microbial Relationships in the Intestine
Hooper, L. V., Wong, M. H., Thelin, A., Hansson, L., Falk, P. G., & Gordon, J. I. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.291.5505.881 · Cited by 2,202
Clarke, G., Grenham, S., Scully, P., Fitzgerald, P., Moloney, R. D., Shanahan, F., Dinan, T. G., & Cryan, J. F. (2013) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/mp.2012.77 · Cited by 1,893
Intestinal barrier function: molecular regulation and disease pathogenesis
Groschwitz, K. R., & Hogan, S. P. (2009) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2009.05.038 · Cited by 1,775
Intestinal Goblet Cells and Mucins in Health and Disease: Recent Insights and Progress
Kim, Y. S., & Ho, S. B. (2010) · Current Gastroenterology Reports · doi:10.1007/s11894-010-0131-2 · Cited by 1,531
Kimura, I., Ozawa, K., Inoue, D., Imamura, T., Kimura, K., Maeda, T., Terasawa, K., Kashihara, D., Hirano, K., Tani, T., et al. (2013) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms2852 · Cited by 1,512
Depression Is the Leading Cause of Disability Around the World
Friedrich, M. J. (2017) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2017.3826 · Cited by 1,459
Exercise and associated dietary extremes impact on gut microbial diversity
Clarke, S. F., Murphy, E. F., O'Sullivan, O., Lucey, A. J., Humphreys, M., Hogan, A., Hayes, P., O'Reilly, M., Jeffery, I. B., Wood-Martin, R., et al. (2014) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2013-306541 · Cited by 1,439
Besselink, M. G., van Santvoort, H. C., Buskens, E., Boermeester, M. A., van Goor, H., Timmerman, H. M., Nieuwenhuijs, V. B., Bollen, T. L., van Ramshorst, B., Witteman, B. J., et al. (2008) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(08)60207-x · Cited by 1,367
Probiotic Mechanisms of Action
Bermúdez-Brito, M., Plaza‐Díaz, J., Muñoz‐Quezada, S., Gómez‐Llorente, C., & Gil, Á. (2012) · Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism · doi:10.1159/000342079 · Cited by 1,326
Messaoudi, M., Lalonde, R., Violle, N., Javelot, H., Desor, D., Nejdi, A., Bisson, J.-F., Rougeot, C., Pichelin, M., Cazaubiel, M., et al. (2011) · British Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1017/s0007114510004319 · Cited by 1,324
Antagonistic activities of lactobacilli and bifidobacteria against microbial pathogens
Servin, A. L. (2004) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.femsre.2004.01.003 · Cited by 1,267
Position statement. Part one: Immune function and exercise.
Walsh, N. P., Gleeson, M., Shephard, R. J., Gleeson, M., Woods, J. A., Bishop, N. C., Fleshner, M., Green, C., Pedersen, B. K., Hoffman‐Goetz, L., et al. (2011) · PubMed · Cited by 1,252
Self-citationChronic Inflammation in Obesity and the Metabolic Syndrome
Monteiro, R., & Azevedo, I. (2010) · Mediators of Inflammation · doi:10.1155/2010/289645 · Cited by 1,186
Duncan, S. H., Louis, P., & Flint, H. J. (2004) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.70.10.5810-5817.2004 · Cited by 1,178
Lactic Acid Permeabilizes Gram-Negative Bacteria by Disrupting the Outer Membrane
Alakomi, H.-L., Skyttä, E., Saarela, M., Mattila-Sandholm, T., Latva-Kala, K., & Helander, I. M. (2000) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.66.5.2001-2005.2000 · Cited by 1,093
Postbiotics: An Evolving Term within the Functional Foods Field
Aguilar-Toalá, J. E., Garcia-Varela, R., Garcia, H. S., Mata-Haro, V., González-Córdova, A. F., Vallejo-Cordoba, B., & Hernández-Mendoza, A. (2018) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2018.03.009 · Cited by 1,078
Fasano, A. (2011) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00003.2008 · Cited by 1,063
Host interactions of probiotic bacterial surface molecules: comparison with commensals and pathogens
Lebeer, S., Vanderleyden, J., & De Keersmaecker, S. C. J. (2010) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2297 · Cited by 1,062
Probiotics, Prebiotics, and Synbiotics
de Vrese, M., & Schrezenmeir, J. (2008) · Advances in biochemical engineering, biotechnology · doi:10.1007/10_2008_097 · Cited by 1,061
Secretion of microbicidal α-defensins by intestinal Paneth cells in response to bacteria
Ayabe, T., Satchell, D. P., Wilson, C. L., Parks, W. C., Selsted, M. E., & Ouellette, A. J. (2000) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/77783 · Cited by 1,060
Immune function in sport and exercise
Gleeson, M. (2007) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00008.2007 · Cited by 1,016
Self-citationIOC Consensus Statement: Dietary Supplements and the High-performance Athlete
Maughan, R. J., Burke, L. M., Dvorak, J., Larson-Meyer, D. E., Peeling, P., Phillips, S. M., Rawson, E. S., Walsh, N. P., Garthe, I., Geyer, H., et al. (2018) · British Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1136/bjsports-2018-099027 · Cited by 1,004
Caesar, R., Tremaroli, V., Kovatcheva-Datchary, P., Cani, P. D., & Bäckhed, F. (2015) · Cell Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2015.07.026 · Cited by 960
Angiogenins: a new class of microbicidal proteins involved in innate immunity
Hooper, L. V., Stappenbeck, T. S., Hong, C. V., & Gordon, J. I. (2003) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/ni888 · Cited by 947
Scheiman, J., Luber, J. M., Chavkin, T. A., MacDonald, T., Tung, A., Pham, L.-D., Wibowo, M. C., Wurth, R. C., Punthambaker, S., Tierney, B. T., et al. (2019) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-019-0485-4 · Cited by 892
Self-citationSchwellnus, M., Soligard, T., Alonso, J.-M., Bahr, R., Clarsen, B., Dijkstra, H. P., Gabbett, T. J., Gleeson, M., Hägglund, M., Hutchinson, M. R., et al. (2016) · British Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1136/bjsports-2016-096572 · Cited by 836
Self-citationProbiotic bacteria and intestinal epithelial barrier function
Ohland, C., & MacNaughton, W. K. (2010) · American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology · doi:10.1152/ajpgi.00243.2009 · Cited by 832
Exercise alters gut microbiota composition and function in lean and obese humans
ALLEN, J. M., MAILING, L. J., NIEMIRO, G. M., MOORE, R., COOK, M. D., WHITE, B. A., HOLSCHER, H. D., & WOODS, J. A. (2018) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/mss.0000000000001495 · Cited by 820
Safety assessment of probiotics for human use
Sanders, M. E., Akkermans, L. M. A., Haller, D., Hammerman, C., Heimbach, J. T., Hörmannsperger, G., & Huys, G. (2010) · Gut Microbes · doi:10.4161/gmic.1.3.12127 · Cited by 816
Storelli, G., Defaye, A., Erkoşar, B., Pascal Hols, A., Royet, J., & Leulier, F. (2011) · Cell Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2011.07.012 · Cited by 816
Probiotic use in clinical practice: what are the risks?
Boyle, R. J., Robins-Browne, R. M., & Tang, M. L. (2006) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/83.6.1256 · Cited by 776
Furrie, E., Macfarlane, S., Kennedy, A., Cummings, J. H., Walsh, S. V., O’Neil, D. A., & Macfarlane, G. T. (2005) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gut.2004.044834 · Cited by 766
Ford, A. C., Quigley, E. M. M., Lacy, B. E., Lembo, A. J., Saito, Y. A., Schiller, L. R., Soffer, E. E., Spiegel, B. M. R., & Moayyedi, P. (2014) · American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1038/ajg.2014.202 · Cited by 747
Bacteriocin Production: a Probiotic Trait?
Dobson, A., Cotter, P. D., Ross, R. P., & Hill, C. (2011) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.05576-11 · Cited by 737
Taverniti, V., & Guglielmetti, S. (2011) · Genes & Nutrition · doi:10.1007/s12263-011-0218-x · Cited by 703
Toll-like receptor 2 controls mucosal inflammation by regulating epithelial barrier function
Cario, E., Gerken, G., & Podolsky, D. K. (2007) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2007.02.056 · Cited by 697
Mack, D. R., Ahrné, S., Hyde, L., Wei, S. H., & Hollingsworth, M. A. (2003) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gut.52.6.827 · Cited by 686
Karczewski, J., Troost, F. J., Konings, I., Dekker, J., Kleerebezem, M., Brummer, R.-J. M., & Wells, J. M. (2010) · American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology · doi:10.1152/ajpgi.00327.2009 · Cited by 676
Steenbergen, L., Sellaro, R., van Hemert, S., Bosch, J. A., & Colzato, L. S. (2015) · Brain, Behavior, and Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.bbi.2015.04.003 · Cited by 671
Barton, W., Penney, N. C., Cronin, O., Garcia-Perez, I., Molloy, M. G., Holmes, E., Shanahan, F., Cotter, P. D., & O'Sullivan, O. (2018) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2016-313627 · Cited by 647
Health Benefits of Heat-Killed (Tyndallized) Probiotics: An Overview
Piqué, N., Berlanga, M., & Miñana-Galbis, D. (2019) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms20102534 · Cited by 642
Ait-Belgnaoui, A., Durand, H., Cartier, C., Chaumaz, G., Eutamene, H., Ferrier, L., Houdeau, E., Fioramonti, J., Bueno, L., & Theodorou, V. (2012) · Psychoneuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2012.03.024 · Cited by 612
Lactobacillus plantarum strain maintains growth of infant mice during chronic undernutrition
Schwarzer, M., Makki, K., Storelli, G., Machuca‐Gayet, I., Šrůtková, D., Hermanová, P. P., Martino, M. E., Balmand, S., Hudcovic, T., Heddi, A., et al. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aad8588 · Cited by 609
Mechanisms of action of probiotics: Recent advances
Ng, S. C., Hart, A. L., Kamm, M. A., Stagg, A. J., & Knight, S. C. (2009) · Inflammatory Bowel Diseases · doi:10.1002/ibd.20602 · Cited by 596
Evans, C. C., LePard, K. J., Kwak, J. W., Stancukas, M. C., Laskowski, S., Dougherty, J., Moulton, L., Glawe, A., Wang, Y., Leone, V., et al. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0092193 · Cited by 587
Clark, A., & Mach, N. (2016) · Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition · doi:10.1186/s12970-016-0155-6 · Cited by 583
Rao, A. V., Bested, A. C., Beaulne, T. M., Katzman, M. A., Iorio, C., Berardi, J. M., & Logan, A. C. (2009) · Gut Pathogens · doi:10.1186/1757-4749-1-6 · Cited by 577
Epithelial crosstalk at the microbiota–mucosal interface
Wells, J. M., Rossi, O., Meijerink, M., & van Baarlen, P. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1000092107 · Cited by 574
Kristensen, N. B., Bryrup, T., Allin, K. H., Nielsen, T., Hansen, T. H., & Pedersen, O. (2016) · Genome Medicine · doi:10.1186/s13073-016-0300-5 · Cited by 561
Impact of consuming a milk drink containing a probiotic on mood and cognition
Benton, D., Williams, C., & Brown, A. (2007) · European Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602546 · Cited by 554
Lyte, M. (2011) · BioEssays · doi:10.1002/bies.201100024 · Cited by 549
Two antioxidative lactobacilli strains as promising probiotics
Kullisaar, T., Zilmer, M., Mikelsaar, M., Vihalemm, T., Annuk, H., Kairane, Č., & Kilk, A. (2002) · International Journal of Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/s0168-1605(01)00674-2 · Cited by 525
Immunomodulatory Effects of Probiotics on Cytokine Profiles
Azad, M. A. K., Sarker, M., & Wan, D. (2018) · BioMed Research International · doi:10.1155/2018/8063647 · Cited by 521
Anderson, R. C., Cookson, A. L., McNabb, W. C., Park, Z., McCann, M. J., Kelly, W. J., & Roy, N. C. (2010) · BMC Microbiology · doi:10.1186/1471-2180-10-316 · Cited by 510
Differences in gut microbiota profile between women with active lifestyle and sedentary women
Bressa, C., Bailén-Andrino, M., Pérez-Santiago, J., González-Soltero, R., Pérez, M., Montalvo-Lominchar, M. G., Maté-Muñoz, J. L., Domínguez, R., Moreno, D., & Larrosa, M. (2017) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0171352 · Cited by 501
The effects of fermentation acids on bacterial growth
Russell, J. B., & Diez-Gonzalez, F. (1997) · Advances in Microbial Physiology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2911(08)60017-x · Cited by 498
Queipo-Ortuño, M. I., Seoane, L. M., Murri, M., Pardo, M., Gomez-Zumaquero, J. M., Cardona, F., Casanueva, F., & Tinahones, F. J. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0065465 · Cited by 497
Estaki, M., Pither, J., Baumeister, P., Little, J. P., Gill, S. K., Ghosh, S., Ahmadi-Vand, Z., Marsden, K. R., & Gibson, D. L. (2016) · Microbiome · doi:10.1186/s40168-016-0189-7 · Cited by 476
Tsilingiri, K., & Rescigno, M. (2012) · Beneficial Microbes · doi:10.3920/bm2012.0046 · Cited by 411
Gastrointestinal Complaints During Exercise: Prevalence, Etiology, and Nutritional Recommendations
de Oliveira, E. P., Burini, R. C., & Jeukendrup, A. (2014) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.1007/s40279-014-0153-2 · Cited by 402
Miettinen, M., Vuopio‐Varkila, J., & Varkila, K. (1996) · Infection and Immunity · doi:10.1128/iai.64.12.5403-5405.1996 · Cited by 402
Gut microbiota richness promotes its stability upon increased dietary fibre intake in healthy adults
Tap, J., Furet, J., Bensaada, M., Philippe, C., Roth, H., Rabot, S., Lakhdari, O., Lombard, V., Henrissat, B., Corthier, G., et al. (2015) · Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1111/1462-2920.13006 · Cited by 397
Lin, M., & Chang, F.-J. (2000) · Digestive Diseases and Sciences · doi:10.1023/a:1005577330695 · Cited by 384
Community characteristics of the gut microbiomes of competitive cyclists
Petersen, L. M., Bautista, E. J., Nguyen, H., Hanson, B. M., Chen, L., Lek, S. H., Sodergren, E., & Weinstock, G. M. (2017) · Microbiome · doi:10.1186/s40168-017-0320-4 · Cited by 377
Erratum to “Pro/Anti-Inflammatory Cytokine Imbalance in Postischemic Left Ventricular Remodeling”
Pasqui, A. L., Renzo, M. D., Maffei, S., Pastorelli, M., Pompella, G., Auteri, A., & Puccetti, L. (2010) · Mediators of Inflammation · doi:10.1155/2010/723589 · Cited by 376
JEUKENDRUP, A. E., VET-JOOP, K., STURK, A., STEGEN, J. H. J. C., SENDEN, J., SARIS, W. H. M., & WAGENMAKERS, A. J. M. (2000) · Clinical Science · doi:10.1042/cs0980047 · Cited by 371
A systematic review of the safety of probiotics
Didari, T., Solki, S., Mozaffari, S., Nikfar, S., & Abdollahi, M. (2014) · Expert Opinion on Drug Safety · doi:10.1517/14740338.2014.872627 · Cited by 367
Endurance exercise and gut microbiota: A review
Mach, N., & Fuster-Botella, D. (2017) · Journal of Sport and Health Science · doi:10.1016/j.jshs.2016.05.001 · Cited by 361
Exercise-Induced Splanchnic Hypoperfusion Results in Gut Dysfunction in Healthy Men
van Wijck, K., Lenaerts, K., van Loon, L. J. C., Peters, W. H. M., Buurman, W. A., & Dejong, C. H. C. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0022366 · Cited by 359
Probiotics promote gut health through stimulation of epithelial innate immunity
Pagnini, C., Saeed, R., Bamias, G., Arseneau, K. O., Pizarro, T. T., & Cominelli, F. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0910307107 · Cited by 358
Kelly, J. R., Allen, A. P., Temko, A., Hutch, W., Kennedy, P. J., Farid, N., Murphy, E., Boylan, G., Bienenstock, J., Cryan, J. F., et al. (2017) · Brain, Behavior, and Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.bbi.2016.11.018 · Cited by 355
Schiffrin, E., Brassart, D., Servin, A., Rochat, F., & Donnet-Hughes, A. (1997) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/66.2.515s · Cited by 354
MATSUMOTO, M., INOUE, R., TSUKAHARA, T., USHIDA, K., CHIJI, H., MATSUBARA, N., & HARA, H. (2008) · Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry · doi:10.1271/bbb.70474 · Cited by 352
Sanchez, M., Darimont, C., Drapeau, V., Emady-Azar, S., Lepage, M., Rezzonico, E., Ngom-Bru, C., Berger, B., Philippe, L., Ammon-Zuffrey, C., et al. (2014) · British Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1017/s0007114513003875 · Cited by 351
Antimicrobial peptides and gut microbiota in homeostasis and pathology
Ostaff, M. J., Stange, E. F., & Wehkamp, J. (2013) · EMBO Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1002/emmm.201201773 · Cited by 348
Interaction of lactic acid bacteria with the gut immune system
Perdigón, G., Galdeano, C. M., Valdez, J., & Medici, M. (2002) · European Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601658 · Cited by 347
The impact of probiotics and prebiotics on the immune system
Klaenhammer, T. R., Kleerebezem, M., Kopp, M., & Rescigno, M. (2012) · Nature reviews. Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri3312 · Cited by 343
In Vitro and In Vivo Inhibition of Helicobacter pylori by Lactobacillus casei Strain Shirota
Sgouras, D. N., Maragkoudakis, P. A., Petraki, K., Martinez‐Gonzalez, B., Eriotou, E., Michopoulos, S., Kalantzopoulos, G., Tsakalidou, E., & Mentis, A. F. (2004) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.70.1.518-526.2004 · Cited by 332
The Unregulated Probiotic Market
de Simone, C. (2019) · Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2018.01.018 · Cited by 317
Keersmaecker, S. C. J. D., Verhoeven, T. L. A., Desair, J., Kathleen Marchal, D., Vanderleyden, J., & Nagy, I. (2006) · FEMS Microbiology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6968.2006.00250.x · Cited by 316
Probiotics up-regulate MUC-2 mucin gene expression in a Caco-2 cell-culture model
Mattar, A., Teitelbaum, D. H., Drongowski, R. A., Fan, Y., Harmon, C. M., & Coran, A. G. (2002) · Pediatric Surgery International · doi:10.1007/s00383-002-0855-7 · Cited by 309
O'Shea, E. F., Cotter, P. D., Stanton, C., Ross, R. P., & Hill, C. (2012) · International Journal of Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.05.025 · Cited by 305
Effects of β-alanine supplementation on exercise performance: a meta-analysis
Hobson, R. M., Saunders, B., Ball, G., Harris, R. C., & Sale, C. (2012) · Amino Acids · doi:10.1007/s00726-011-1200-z · Cited by 305
Mukai, T., Asasaka, T., Sato, E., Mori, K., Matsumoto, M., & Ohori, H. (2002) · FEMS Immunology & Medical Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1574-695x.2002.tb00541.x · Cited by 298
Exercise Attenuates PCB-Induced Changes in the Mouse Gut Microbiome
Choi, J. J., Eum, S. Y., Rampersaud, E., Daunert, S., Abreu, M. T., & Toborek, M. (2013) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.1306534 · Cited by 298
Akkermansia muciniphila improves metabolic profiles by reducing inflammation in chow diet-fed mice
Zhao, S., Liu, W., Wang, J., Shi, J., Sun, Y., Wang, W., Ning, G., Liu, R., & Hong, J. (2017) · Journal of Molecular Endocrinology · doi:10.1530/jme-16-0054 · Cited by 298
Chen, Y.-M., Wei, L., Chiu, Y.-S., Hsu, Y.-J., Tsai, T.-Y., Wang, M.-F., & Huang, C.-C. (2016) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu8040205 · Cited by 297
Exercise induction of gut microbiota modifications in obese, non-obese and hypertensive rats
Petriz, B. A., Castro, A. P., Almeida, J. A., Gomes, C. P., Fernandes, G. R., Kruger, R. H., Pereira, R. W., & Franco, O. L. (2014) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/1471-2164-15-511 · Cited by 293
Kato-Kataoka, A., Nishida, K., Takada, M., Kawai, M., Kikuchi-Hayakawa, H., Suda, K., Ishikawa, H., Gondo, Y., Shimizu, K., Matsuki, T., et al. (2016) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.04134-15 · Cited by 288
van Wijck, K., Lenaerts, K., Grootjans, J., Wijnands, K. A. P., Poeze, M., van Loon, L. J. C., Dejong, C. H. C., & Buurman, W. A. (2012) · American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology · doi:10.1152/ajpgi.00066.2012 · Cited by 285
Sanders, M. E., Merenstein, D., Merrifield, C. A., & Hutkins, R. (2018) · Nutrition Bulletin · doi:10.1111/nbu.12334 · Cited by 278
Probiotics: definition, scope and mechanisms of action
Reid, G. (2015) · Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology · doi:10.1016/j.bpg.2015.12.001 · Cited by 273
Exercise and Respiratory Tract Viral Infections
Martin, S. A., Pence, B. D., & Woods, J. A. (2009) · Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews · doi:10.1097/jes.0b013e3181b7b57b · Cited by 269
Antimicrobial Activity – The Most Important Property of Probiotic and Starter Lactic Acid Bacteria
Šušković, J., Kos, B., Beganović, J., Pavunc, A. L., Habjanič, K., & Matošić, S. (2010) · University of Zagreb University Computing Centre (SRCE) · Cited by 268
The effect of diet and exercise on intestinal integrity and microbial diversity in mice
Campbell, S. C., Wisniewski, P. J., Noji, M., McGuinness, L. R., Häggblom, M. M., Lightfoot, S. A., Joseph, L. B., & Kerkhof, L. J. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0150502 · Cited by 268
TNF-α impairs heart and skeletal muscle protein synthesis by altering translation initiation
Lang, C. H., Frost, R. A., Nairn, A. C., MacLean, D. A., & Vary, T. C. (2002) · American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism · doi:10.1152/ajpendo.00366.2001 · Cited by 265
Lamprecht, M., Bogner, S., Schippinger, G., Steinbauer, K., Fankhauser, F., Hallstroem, S., Schuetz, B., & Greilberger, J. F. (2012) · Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition · doi:10.1186/1550-2783-9-45 · Cited by 257
Self-citationCerdá, B., Pérez, M., Pérez-Santiago, J. D., Tornero-Aguilera, J. F., González-Soltero, R., & Larrosa, M. (2016) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2016.00051 · Cited by 247
Wang, X., Shao, C., Liu, L., Guo, X., Xu, Y., & Lü, X. (2017) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.05.118 · Cited by 247
Takada, M., Nishida, K., Kataoka‐Kato, A., Gondo, Y., Ishikawa, H., Suda, K., Kawai, M., Hoshi, R., Watanabe, O., Igarashi, T., et al. (2016) · Neurogastroenterology & Motility · doi:10.1111/nmo.12804 · Cited by 243
Daily Probiotic’s (Lactobacillus casei Shirota) Reduction of Infection Incidence in Athletes
Gleeson, M., Bishop, N. C., Oliveira, M., & Tauler, P. (2011) · International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism · doi:10.1123/ijsnem.21.1.55 · Cited by 239
Self-citationMakras, L., Triantafyllou, V., Fayol-Messaoudi, D., Adriany, T., Ζουμποπούλου, Γ., Tsakalidou, E., Servin, A. L., & Vuyst, L. D. (2005) · Research in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.resmic.2005.09.002 · Cited by 238
McFarland, L. V. (2014) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005047 · Cited by 235
Cox, A. J., Pyne, D. B., Saunders, P. U., & Fricker, P. A. (2010) · British Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1136/bjsm.2007.044628 · Cited by 234
Self-citationUpper respiratory tract infection is reduced in physically fit and active adults
Nieman, D. C., Henson, D. A., Austin, M. D., & Sha, W. (2010) · British Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1136/bjsm.2010.077875 · Cited by 234
Exercise, Nutrition and the Brain
MEEUSEN, R. R. (2014) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.1007/s40279-014-0150-5 · Cited by 228
Kondo, S., Xiao, J., SATOH, T., Odamaki, T., Takahashi, S., Sugahara, H., Yaeshima, T., Iwatsuki, K., Kamei, A., & Abe, K. (2010) · Bioscience Biotechnology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1271/bbb.100267 · Cited by 228
Plaza‐Díaz, J. (2014) · World Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.3748/wjg.v20.i42.15632 · Cited by 227
Kolaček, S., Hojsak, I., Berni Canani, R., Guarino, A., Indrio, F., Orel, R., Pot, B., Shamir, R., Szajewska, H., Vandenplas, Y., et al. (2017) · Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition · doi:10.1097/mpg.0000000000001603 · Cited by 224
Ruan, Y., Sun, J. M., He, J., Chen, F., Chen, R., & Chen, H. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0132121 · Cited by 221
Metabiotics: novel idea or natural development of probiotic conception
Ba, S. (2013) · Microbial Ecology in Health and Disease · doi:10.3402/mehd.v24i0.20399 · Cited by 218 · cited 1×
“These properties can positively affect the microbiota homeostasis and/or the host metabolic and signaling pathways, physiological, immunological, neuro-hormone biological, regulatory and metabolic reactions [180, 181].”
BackgroundMaes, M. H. J., Kubera, M., Leunis, J., Berk, M., Geffard, M., & Bosmans, E. (2012) · Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0447.2012.01908.x · Cited by 209
Martarelli, D., Verdenelli, M. C., Scuri, S., Cocchioni, M., Silvi, S., Cecchini, C., & Pompei, P. (2011) · Current Microbiology · doi:10.1007/s00284-011-9915-3 · Cited by 209
Jeukendrup, A. E. (2017) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.1007/s40279-017-0690-6 · Cited by 208
Sports Dietitians Australia Position Statement: Sports Nutrition for the Adolescent Athlete
Desbrow, B., McCormack, J., Burke, L. M., Cox, G. R., Fallon, K. E., Hislop, M., Logan, R., Marino, N., Sawyer, S. M., Shaw, G., et al. (2014) · International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism · doi:10.1123/ijsnem.2014-0031 · Cited by 207
Shing, C. M., Peake, J. M., Lim, C. L., Briskey, D., Walsh, N. P., Fortes, M. B., Ahuja, K. D. K., & Vitetta, L. (2014) · European Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1007/s00421-013-2748-y · Cited by 204
Velraeds, M. M. C., van de Belt‐Gritter, B., van der Mei, H. C., Reid, G., & Busscher, H. J. (1998) · Journal of Medical Microbiology · doi:10.1099/00222615-47-12-1081 · Cited by 202
Dietary Supplements for Health, Adaptation, and Recovery in Athletes
Rawson, E. S., Miles, M. P., & Larson-Meyer, D. E. (2018) · International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism · doi:10.1123/ijsnem.2017-0340 · Cited by 201
The microbiota: An exercise immunology perspective
Bermon, S., Petriz, B. A., Kajėnienė, A., Prestes, J., Castell, L. M., & Castell, L. (2026) · PubMed · doi:10.22029/eir.2015.1697 · Cited by 193
Sharma, M., & Shukla, G. (2016) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2016.01940 · Cited by 193
Knowles, S. R., Nelson, E. A., & Palombo, E. A. (2008) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2007.09.010 · Cited by 192
Sensing Gram-Negative Bacterial Lipopolysaccharides: a Human Disease Determinant?
Munford, R. S. (2008) · Infection and Immunity · doi:10.1128/iai.00939-07 · Cited by 189
Effects of Probiotics on Cognitive Reactivity, Mood, and Sleep Quality
Marotta, A., Sarno, E., Del Casale, A., Pane, M., Mogna, L., Amoruso, A., Felis, G. E., & Fiorio, M. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00164 · Cited by 186
Self-citationInteractions between the microbiota and the intestinal mucosa
Schiffrin, E., & Blum, S. (2002) · European Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601489 · Cited by 183
Gut microbiota and probiotics in chronic liver diseases
Cesaro, C., Tiso, A., Del Prete, A., Cariello, R., Tuccillo, C., Cotticelli, G., del Vecchio Blanco, C., & Loguercio, C. (2011) · Digestive and Liver Disease · doi:10.1016/j.dld.2010.10.015 · Cited by 182
Kim, J., Yun, J. M., Kim, M. K., Kwon, O., & Cho, B. (2018) · Journal of Medicinal Food · doi:10.1089/jmf.2017.3937 · Cited by 182
Mörkl, S., Lackner, S., Müller, W., Gorkiewicz, G., Kashofer, K., Oberascher, A., Painold, A., Holl, A., Holzer, P., Meinitzer, A., et al. (2017) · International Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1002/eat.22801 · Cited by 181
West, N. P., Pyne, D. B., Cripps, A. W., Hopkins, W. G., Eskesen, D. C., Jairath, A., Christophersen, C. T., Conlon, M. A., & Fricker, P. A. (2011) · Nutrition Journal · doi:10.1186/1475-2891-10-30 · Cited by 180
Self-citationEffect of probiotic on growth performance and digestive enzyme activity of Arbor Acres broilers
Wang, Y., & Gu, Q. (2010) · Research in Veterinary Science · doi:10.1016/j.rvsc.2010.03.009 · Cited by 178
Probiotic Microbes Sustain Youthful Serum Testosterone Levels and Testicular Size in Aging Mice
Poutahidis, T., Springer, A., Levkovich, T., Qi, P., Varian, B. J., Lakritz, J. R., Ibrahim, Y. M., Chatzigiagkos, A., Alm, E. J., & Erdman, S. E. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0084877 · Cited by 177
Recommendations to maintain immune health in athletes
Walsh, N. P. (2018) · European Journal of Sport Science · doi:10.1080/17461391.2018.1449895 · Cited by 176
Probiotics in The Treatment of Irritable Bowel Syndrome
Saggioro, A. (2004) · Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology · doi:10.1097/01.mcg.0000129271.98814.e2 · Cited by 175
Lee, K., Paek, K., Lee, H. Y., Park, J. H., & Lee, Y. (2007) · Journal of Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.2007.03336.x · Cited by 175
The Gut Microbiota and Developmental Programming of the Testis in Mice
Al-Asmakh, M., Stukenborg, J.-B., Reda, A., Anuar, F., Strand, M.-L., Hedin, L., Pettersson, S., & Söder, O. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0103809 · Cited by 173
Kekkonen, R. A., Vasankari, T. J., Vuorimaa, T., Haahtela, T., Julkunen, I., & Korpela, R. (2007) · International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism · doi:10.1123/ijsnem.17.4.352 · Cited by 170
Role of Toll-like receptors in the development of immunotolerance mediated by probiotics
Gómez‐Llorente, C., Muñoz, S., & Gil, Á. (2010) · Proceedings of The Nutrition Society · doi:10.1017/s0029665110001527 · Cited by 169
World Gastroenterology Organisation
Levin, B. (2010) · Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology · doi:10.1097/mcg.0b013e3181f0f714 · Cited by 169
Exercise regulation of intestinal tight junction proteins
Zuhl, M., Schneider, S., Lanphere, K., Conn, C., Dokladny, K., & Moseley, P. (2014) · British Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1136/bjsports-2012-091585 · Cited by 167
Gleeson, M., Bishop, N., Oliveira, M., McCauley, T., Tauler, P., & Muhamad, A. S. (2012) · Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0838.2010.01272.x · Cited by 165
Self-citationNeeser, J., Granato, D., Rouvet, M., Servin, A. L., Teneberg, S., & Karlsson, K. ‐. (2000) · Glycobiology · doi:10.1093/glycob/10.11.1193 · Cited by 165
Huang, W.-C., Wei, C.-C., Huang, C., Chen, W.-L., & Huang, H.-Y. (2019) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu11020353 · Cited by 165
Buckley, J. D., Thomson, R. L., Coates, A. M., Howe, P. R. C., DeNichilo, M. O., & Rowney, M. K. (2010) · Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport · doi:10.1016/j.jsams.2008.06.007 · Cited by 164
Para-probiotics for Preterm Neonates—The Next Frontier
Deshpande, G., Athalye-Jape, G., & Patole, S. (2018) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu10070871 · Cited by 164
Linking dietary patterns with gut microbial composition and function
Sheflin, A. M., Melby, C. L., Carbonero, F., & Weir, T. L. (2017) · Gut Microbes · doi:10.1080/19490976.2016.1270809 · Cited by 162
Probiotic Bacillus coagulans GBI-30, 6086 Improves Protein Absorption and Utilization
Jäger, R., Purpura, M., Farmer, S., Cash, H. A., & Keller, D. (2017) · Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins · doi:10.1007/s12602-017-9354-y · Cited by 160
Self-citationLancaster, G., Halson, S., Khan, Q., Drysdale, P., Wallace, F., Jeukendrup, A., Drayson, M., & Gleeson, M. (2026) · Exercise Immunology Review · doi:10.22029/eir.2004.1608 · Cited by 159
Self-citationWest, N. P., Horn, P. L., Pyne, D. B., Gebski, V. J., Lahtinen, S. J., Fricker, P. A., & Cripps, A. W. (2014) · Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2013.10.002 · Cited by 159
Self-citationMoreno-Pérez, D., Bressa, C., Bailén, M., Hamed-Bousdar, S., Naclerio, F., Carmona, M., Pérez, M., González-Soltero, R., Montalvo-Lominchar, M., Carabaña, C., et al. (2018) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu10030337 · Cited by 158
Hardin, B. J., Campbell, K. S., Smith, J. D., Arbogast, S., Smith, J., Moylan, J. S., & Reid, M. B. (2008) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00898.2007 · Cited by 156
Nutritional Considerations in Triathlon
Jeukendrup, A. E., Jentjens, R. L. P. G., & Moseley, L. (2005) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.2165/00007256-200535020-00005 · Cited by 155
Cook, M. D., Martin, S. A., Williams, C., Whitlock, K., Wallig, M. A., Pence, B. D., & Woods, J. A. (2013) · Brain, Behavior, and Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.bbi.2013.05.005 · Cited by 153
Gastrointestinal Complaints in Relation to Dietary Intake in Triathletes
Rehrer, N. J., van Kemenade, M., Meester, W., Brouns, F., & Saris, W. H. M. (1992) · International Journal of Sport Nutrition · doi:10.1123/ijsn.2.1.48 · Cited by 153
Klemenak, M., Dolinšek, J., Langerholc, T., Gioia, D. D., & Mičetić‐Turk, D. (2015) · Digestive Diseases and Sciences · doi:10.1007/s10620-015-3769-7 · Cited by 150
Exploration of bacterial community classes in major human habitats
Zhou, Y., Mihindukulasuriya, K. A., Gao, H., La Rosa, P. S., Wylie, K. M., Martin, J. C., Kota, K., Shannon, W. D., Mitreva, M., Sodergren, E., et al. (2014) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2014-15-5-r66 · Cited by 149
Functional genomic analyses of the gut microbiota for CRC screening
Konstantinov, S. R., Kuipers, E. J., & Peppelenbosch, M. P. (2013) · Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1038/nrgastro.2013.178 · Cited by 148
Obesity and microbiota: an example of an intricate relationship
Duranti, S., Ferrario, C., van Sinderen, D., Ventura, M., & Turroni, F. (2017) · Genes & Nutrition · doi:10.1186/s12263-017-0566-2 · Cited by 148
Chenoll, E., Casinos, B., Bataller, E., Astals, P., Echevarría, J., Iglesias, J. R., Balbarie, P., Ramón, D., & Genovés, S. (2010) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.01820-10 · Cited by 142
Strasser, B., Geiger, D., Schauer, M., Gostner, J., Gatterer, H., Burtscher, M., & Fuchs, D. (2016) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu8110752 · Cited by 142
Probiotics supplementation for athletes – Clinical and physiological effects
Pyne, D. B., West, N. P., Cox, A. J., & Cripps, A. W. (2015) · European Journal of Sport Science · doi:10.1080/17461391.2014.971879 · Cited by 139
Self-citationRemission induction and maintenance effect of probiotics on ulcerative colitis: A meta-analysis
Sang, L.-X. (2010) · World Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.3748/wjg.v16.i15.1908 · Cited by 133 · cited 1×
“Probiotics may regulate the mucosal immune response [47], improve the activity of macrophages [48] and modulate the expression of the genes associated with macrophage activity.”
BackgroundMoreno-Muñoz, J. A., Chenoll, E., Casinos, B., Bataller, E., Ramón, D., Genovés, S., Montava, R., Ribes, J. M., Buesa, J., Fàbrega, J., et al. (2011) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.05548-11 · Cited by 130
Probiotic use in at-risk populations
Sanders, M. E., Merenstein, D. J., Ouwehand, A. C., Reid, G., Salminen, S., Cabana, M. D., Paraskevakos, G., & Leyer, G. (2016) · Journal of the American Pharmacists Association · doi:10.1016/j.japh.2016.07.001 · Cited by 129
Probiotic supplementation and trimethylamine‐N‐oxide production following a high‐fat diet
Boutagy, N. E., Neilson, A. P., Osterberg, K. L., Smithson, A. T., Englund, T. R., Davy, B. M., Hulver, M. W., & Davy, K. P. (2015) · Obesity · doi:10.1002/oby.21212 · Cited by 127
Coconnier, M. H., Bernet‐Camard, M., Chauvière, G., & Servin, A. L. (1993) · PubMed · Cited by 124
Larsen, C. N., Nielsen, S., Kæstel, P., Brockmann, E., Bennedsen, M., Christensen, H. R., Eskesen, D. C., Jacobsen, B. L., & Michaelsen, K. F. (2006) · European Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602450 · Cited by 124
Reis, D. J., Ilardi, S. S., & Punt, S. E. W. (2018) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0199041 · Cited by 123
Flynn, M. G., & McFarlin, B. K. (2006) · Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews · doi:10.1249/01.jes.0000240027.22749.14 · Cited by 121
Biodiversity: are microbial species threatened?
Staley, J. T. (1997) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/s0958-1669(97)80014-6 · Cited by 116
Hsu, Y.-J., Huang, W.-C., Lin, J.-S., Chen, Y.-M., Ho, S.-T., Huang, C.-C., & Tung, Y.-T. (2018) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu10070862 · Cited by 116
Akbari, V., & Hendijani, F. (2016) · Nutrition Reviews · doi:10.1093/nutrit/nuw039 · Cited by 115
Four weeks of probiotic supplementation reduces GI symptoms during a marathon race
Pugh, J. N., Sparks, A. S., Doran, D. A., Fleming, S. C., Langan-Evans, C., Kirk, B., Fearn, R., Morton, J. P., & Close, G. L. (2019) · European Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1007/s00421-019-04136-3 · Cited by 115
Self-citationMinami, J.-I., Kondo, S., Yanagisawa, N., Odamaki, T., Xiao, J., Abe, F., Nakajima, S., Hamamoto, Y., Saitoh, S., & Shimoda, T. (2015) · Journal of Nutritional Science · doi:10.1017/jns.2015.5 · Cited by 114
Inhibition of adhesion of food-borne pathogens to Caco-2 cells by Lactobacillus strains
Todoriki, K., Mukai, T., Sato, S., & Toba, T. (2001) · Journal of Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2672.2001.01371.x · Cited by 113
Hirano, J., Yoshida, T., Sugiyama, T., Koide, N., Mori, I., & Yokochi, T. (2003) · Microbiology and Immunology · doi:10.1111/j.1348-0421.2003.tb03377.x · Cited by 113
Gauchard, G. C., Gangloff, P., Vouriot, A., Mallié, J.-P., & Perrin, P. (2002) · International Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/00207450290026157 · Cited by 112
Jäger, R., Shields, K. A., Lowery, R. P., De Souza, E. O., Partl, J. M., Hollmer, C., Purpura, M., & Wilson, J. M. (2016) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.2276 · Cited by 111
Self-citationArora, M., & Baldi, A. (2015) · Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology · doi:10.4103/0255-0857.150868 · Cited by 110
Castration influences intestinal microflora and induces abdominal obesity in high-fat diet-fed mice
Harada, N., Hanaoka, R., Horiuchi, H., Kitakaze, T., Mitani, T., Inui, H., & Yamaji, R. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep23001 · Cited by 110
Current level of consensus on probiotic science-Report of an expert meeting-London, 23 November 2009
Rowland, I. R., Capurso, L., Collins, K., Cummings, J., Delzenne, N., Goulet, O., Guarner, F., Marteau, P., & Meier, R. (2010) · Gut Microbes · doi:10.4161/gmic.1.6.13610 · Cited by 109
Clancy, R. L., Gleeson, M., Cox, A., Callister, R., Dorrington, M., D’Este, C., Pang, G., Pyne, D., Fricker, P., & Henriksson, A. (2006) · British Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1136/bjsm.2005.024364 · Cited by 108
Self-citationLee, J., Yang, W., Hostetler, A., Schultz, N., Suckow, M. A., Stewart, K. L., Kim, D. D., & Kim, H. S. (2016) · BMC Microbiology · doi:10.1186/s12866-016-0686-7 · Cited by 107
Nishida, K., Sawada, D., Kuwano, Y., Tanaka, H., Sugawara, T., Aoki, Y., Fujiwara, S., & Rokutan, K. (2017) · Journal of Functional Foods · doi:10.1016/j.jff.2017.06.031 · Cited by 104
Maretti, C., & Cavallini, G. (2017) · Andrology · doi:10.1111/andr.12336 · Cited by 103
Nakamura, S., Kuda, T., An, C., et al. (2011) · Anaerobe · doi:10.1016/j.anaerobe.2011.11.006 · Cited by 101
Food-dependent, exercise-induced gastrointestinal distress
de Oliveira, E. P., & Burini, R. C. (2011) · Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition · doi:10.1186/1550-2783-8-12 · Cited by 100
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- MetchnikoffE The prolongated of life; optimistic studies1908 New York G.P. Putnam’s Son
- CrampTBroadEMartinDMeyerBJEffects of preexercise carbohydrate ingestion on mountain bike performanceMed Sci Sports Exerc16022004 36 1609
- NazemianVShadnoushMManahejiHZaringhalamJProbiotics and inflammatory pain: a literature review studyMiddle East J Rehab Health20163 e36087
- AghaeeMKhosraviNHanachiPKordiMRAghaeeREffect of probiotic supplement on immune response in male athletesQom Univ Med Sci20147 27 33
- Narimani-Rad et al. Indian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Life Sciences (Online) An Open Access Online International Journal Available at www.cibtech.org/sp.ed/jls/2014/03/jls.htm. 2014;4(S3):231–5. ISSN: 2231–6345.
- NicolaSMognaLAllesinaSBarbaMDeiddaFLorenziniPRaiteriEStrozziGMognaGInteraction between probiotics and human immune cells. The prospective anti-inflammatory activity of Bifidobacterium breve BRO3Agro Food Ind Hi-Tech201021 9 13
- Brennan C.J.; Axelrod C.; Paul D.; Hull M.; Kirwan J.P. Effects of a novel probiotic on exercise-induced gut permeability and microbiota in endurance athletes (abstract). In proceedings of American College of Sports Medicine Minneapolis MN.
- BermonSPetrizBKajenieneAPrestesJCastellLFrancoOLThe microbiota: an exercise immunology perspectiveExerc Immunol Rev201521 70 79 25825908 25825908
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and World Health Organization Joint FAO/WHO working group report on drafting guidelines fro the evaluation of probiotics in food2002
- ANVISA-Ministry of Health Technical Regulation of Bioeactive and Probiotic Substances Isolated with Allegations of Functional or Health Properties2008
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Probiotics, prebiotics, and postbiotics in health and disease
Ji, J., Jin, W., Liu, S., Jiao, Z., & Li, X. (2023) · MedComm · doi:10.1002/mco2.420 · Cited by 449
Physical Activity and Diet Shape the Immune System during Aging
Weyh, C., Krüger, K., & Strasser, B. (2020) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu12030622 · Cited by 217
“Furthermore, probiotic intake can help to reduce the incidence of infection in athletes, and there is now evidence from a number of studies in support of this [115].”
BackgroundHughes, R., & Holscher, H. D. (2021) · Advances in Nutrition · doi:10.1093/advances/nmab077 · Cited by 212
Gut Microbiota, Probiotics and Physical Performance in Athletes and Physically Active Individuals
Marttinen, M., Ala‐Jaakkola, R., Laitila, A., & Lehtinen, M. J. (2020) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu12102936 · Cited by 187
“Recently, the International Society of Sports Nutrition (ISSN) provided a position stand on probiotics, concluding that probiotics have strain-specific effects in athletes [24].”
BackgroundAya, V., Flórez, A., Perez, L., & Ramírez, J. D. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0247039 · Cited by 165
“The use of dietary assessments methods like food diaries [98] can aid the quantitative and qualitative exploration of macro and micronutrients consumption [99]; it would also be relevant to determine the preliminary use of probiotics and prebiotics since its consumption has become recurrent in athletic population espe…”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Jäger, R., Mohr, A. E., Carpenter, K. C., Kerksick, C. M., Purpura, M., Moussa, A., Townsend, J. R., Lamprecht, M., West, N. P., Black, K., Gleeson, M., Pyne, D. B., Wells, S. D., Arent, S. M., Smith-Ryan, A. E., Kreider, R. B., Campbell, B. I., Bannock, L., Scheiman, J., Wissent, C. J., Pane, M., Kalman, D. S., Pugh, J. N., ter Haar, J. A., & Antonio, J.
- Affiliations
- Increnovo LLC (United States) (US)
- Arizona State University (US)
- Novita Healthcare (Australia) (AU)
- Lindenwood University (US)
- University of Münster (DE)
- Lipscomb University (US)
- University of Graz (AT)
- Griffith University (AU)
- University of Otago (NZ)
- Loughborough University (GB)
- University of Canberra (AU)
- WGI
- University of South Carolina (US)
- Applied Physiology Laboratory, Department of Exercise and Sport Science
- Texas A&M University (US)
- University of South Florida (US)
- Institute of Performance Nutrition
- Fitbiomics, Inc
- Jamieson Wellness Inc
- Bioloab Research
- Nutrasource (CA)
- Liverpool John Moores University (GB)
- International Probiotic Association
- Exercise and Sport Science
- Corresponding author
- Jäger, Ralf
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2019-01-15
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 62-62
- ISSN
- 1550-2783 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6925426
- OpenAlex
- W2996536203
- Semantic Scholar
- 27ac0b0bb54b3cb210bd6933368dcbf87dc94adf
- Cited by
- 277
- References
- 291
- Citations by year
- 2026: 40 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 28
- FWCI
- 2.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Liverpool John Moores University (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
- Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Rutgers University Community Repository (Rutgers University) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Loughborough University Research Repository (Loughborough University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
- Keywords
- probiotics, probiotic supplementation, athletes, gut microbiota, immune function, upper respiratory tract infection, intestinal barrier, intestinal permeability, exercise-induced inflammation, muscle damage recovery, nutrient absorption, sports nutrition, post-exercise recovery, heat stress, training load, immune depression, respiratory infections
- MeSH terms
- Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Body Composition, Humans, Societies, Medical, Exercise, Probiotics, Athletic Performance, Athletes, Sports Nutritional Sciences
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-08, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-08 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review