The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function
Solow, R. M. (1957) · The Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.2307/1926047 · Cited by 12,259
Cited by
Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393553 · Cited by 35,728
Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches
Suchman, M. C. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258788 · Cited by 19,903
Teece, D. J. (2007) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.640 · Cited by 16,825
Clarifying the Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct and Linking It to Performance
Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1996) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1996.9602161568 · Cited by 10,159
Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology
Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393988 · Cited by 8,499
Geels, F. W. (2002) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(02)00062-8 · Cited by 7,275
Technological paradigms and technological trajectories
Dosi, G. (1982) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(82)90016-6 · Cited by 6,685
Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators
Damanpour, F. (1991) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256406 · Cited by 6,542
Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development
Leonard-Barton, D. (1992) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250131009 · Cited by 6,477
Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.507 · Cited by 6,324
Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways
Geels, F. W., & Schot, J. (2007) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003 · Cited by 5,245
From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems
Geels, F. W. (2004) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.015 · Cited by 4,098
Managing Firm Resources in Dynamic Environments to Create Value: Looking Inside the Black Box
Sirmon, D. G., Hitt, M. A., & Ireland, R. D. (2007) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2007.23466005 · Cited by 3,701
Technological Discontinuities and Dominant Designs: A Cyclical Model of Technological Change
Anderson, P., & Tushman, M. L. (1990) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393511 · Cited by 3,255
Self-citationEntrepreneurial orientation and small business performance: a configurational approach
Wiklund, J., & Shepherd, D. (2005) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2004.01.001 · Cited by 3,196
Lean manufacturing: context, practice bundles, and performance
Shah, R., & Ward, P. T. (2003) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/s0272-6963(02)00108-0 · Cited by 2,897
Interorganizational Endorsements and the Performance of Entrepreneurial Ventures
Stuart, T. E., Hoang, H., & Hybels, R. C. (1999) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2666998 · Cited by 2,751
Sectoral systems of innovation and production
Malerba, F. (2002) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(01)00139-1 · Cited by 2,733
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Schoonhoven, C. B. (1996) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.7.2.136 · Cited by 2,672
Organizing for Innovation in the Digitized World
Yoo, Y., Boland, R. J., Lyytinen, K., & Majchrzak, A. (2012) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1120.0771 · Cited by 2,469
Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator's dilemma
O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2008) · Research in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.riob.2008.06.002 · Cited by 2,431
Self-citationAdaptation on Rugged Landscapes
Levinthal, D. A. (1997) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.43.7.934 · Cited by 2,254
Internal capabilities, external networks, and performance: a study on technology‐based ventures
Lee, C., Lee, K., & Pennings, J. M. (2001) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.181 · Cited by 2,018
Why do firms differ, and how does it matter?
Nelson, R. R. (1991) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250121006 · Cited by 1,970
Aging, Obsolescence, and Organizational Innovation
Sørensen, J. B., & Stuart, T. E. (2000) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2666980 · Cited by 1,862
Garcia, R., & Calantone, R. (2002) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/1540-5885.1920110 · Cited by 3,470
Disrupted Routines: Team Learning and New Technology Implementation in Hospitals
Edmondson, A. C., Bohmer, R. M., & Pisano, G. P. (2001) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3094828 · Cited by 1,729
Business model design and the performance of entrepreneurial firms
Zott, C., & Amit, R. (2007) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1060.0232 · Cited by 1,707
Ramos‐Rodríguez, A., & Ruíz‐Navarro, J. (2004) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.397 · Cited by 1,626
10 Sociomateriality: Challenging the Separation of Technology, Work and Organization
Orlikowski, W. J., & Scott, S. V. (2008) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520802211644 · Cited by 2,571
Technology Diffusion and Organizational Learning: The Case of Business Computing
Attewell, P. (1992) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.3.1.1 · Cited by 1,401
Firm's resilience to supply chain disruptions: Scale development and empirical examination
Ambulkar, S., Blackhurst, J., & Grawe, S. (2015) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2014.11.002 · Cited by 1,400
Unbundling the structure of inertia: Resource versus routine rigidity
Gilbert, C. G. (2005) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2005.18803920 · Cited by 1,375
Technology as a complex adaptive system: evidence from patent data
Fleming, L., & Sorenson, O. (2001) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(00)00135-9 · Cited by 1,315
Carpenter, M. A., & Westphal, J. D. (2001) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/3069408 · Cited by 1,312
Theory and research in strategic management: Swings of a pendulum
Hoskisson, R. E., Hitt, M. A., Wan, W. P., & Yiu, D. (1999) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639902500307 · Cited by 1,364
The Technology–Organization–Environment Framework
Baker, J. (2012) · Integrated Series in Information Systems · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-6108-2_12 · Cited by 1,275
Networks, platforms, and strategy: Emerging views and next steps
McIntyre, D. P., & Srinivasan, A. (2017) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2596 · Cited by 1,109
Incumbent's advantage through exploiting complementary assets via interfirm cooperation
Rothaermel, F. T. (2001) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.180 · Cited by 1,114
The birth of capabilities: market entry and the importance of pre-history
Helfat, C. E. (2002) · Industrial and Corporate Change · doi:10.1093/icc/11.4.725 · Cited by 1,087
Unruh, G. C. (2002) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/s0301-4215(01)00098-2 · Cited by 1,020
Fading Memories: A Process Theory of Strategic Business Exit in Dynamic Environments
Burgelman, R. A. (1994) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393493 · Cited by 1,018
The Strength of Corporate Culture and the Reliability of Firm Performance
Sørensen, J. B. (2002) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3094891 · Cited by 1,004
Greenwash vs. Brownwash: Exaggeration and Undue Modesty in Corporate Sustainability Disclosure
Kim, E.-H., & Lyon, T. P. (2015) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2014.0949 · Cited by 932
Papers and patents are becoming less disruptive over time
Park, M., Leahey, E., & Funk, R. J. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05543-x · Cited by 899
Leadership skills for a changing world
Mumford, M. D., Zaccaro, S. J., Harding, F. D., Jacobs, T. O., & Fleishman, E. A. (2000) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/s1048-9843(99)00041-7 · Cited by 888
Song, M., Droge, C., Hanvanich, S., & Calantone, R. (2005) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.450 · Cited by 844
Unpacking the innovation ecosystem construct: Evolution, gaps and trends
Gomes, L. A. D. V., Facin, A. L. F., Salerno, M. S., & Ikenami, R. K. (2018) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.11.009 · Cited by 836
An introduction to evolutionary theories in economics
Dosi, G., & Nelson, R. R. (1994) · Journal of Evolutionary Economics · doi:10.1007/bf01236366 · Cited by 804
Disruptive Innovation: An Intellectual History and Directions for Future Research
Christensen, C. M., McDonald, R., Altman, E. J., & Palmer, J. E. (2018) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12349 · Cited by 789
Eggers, J. P., & Kaplan, S. (2009) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1080.0401 · Cited by 774
Reflections on “Profiting from Innovation”
Teece, D. J. (2006) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.009 · Cited by 733
Thinking about technology: Applying a cognitive lens to technical change
Kaplan, S., & Tripsas, M. (2008) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.02.002 · Cited by 661
The illusory diffusion of innovation: An examination of assimilation gaps
Fichman, R. G., & Kemerer, C. F. (1999) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.10.3.255 · Cited by 633
Wilden, R., & Gudergan, S. P. (2015) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-014-0380-y · Cited by 631
A Behavioral Theory of the Firm—40 Years and Counting: Introduction and Impact
Argote, L., & Greve, H. R. (2007) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1070.0280 · Cited by 606
Many are Called, but Few are Chosen: An Evolutionary Perspective for the Study of Entrepreneurship
Aldrich, H. E., & Martinez, M. A. (2001) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1177/104225870102500404 · Cited by 596
Taxonomic efforts in the description of leader behavior: A synthesis and functional interpretation
Fleishman, E. A., Mumford, M. D., Zaccaro, S. J., Levin, K. Y., Korotkin, A. L., & Hein, M. B. (1991) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/1048-9843(91)90016-u · Cited by 580
Caveat Emptor: The Construction of Nonprofit Consumer Watchdog Organizations
Rao, H. (1998) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/231293 · Cited by 562
A Reflective Review of Disruptive Innovation Theory
Yu, D., & Hang, C. C. (2010) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00272.x · Cited by 547
Dynamic capabilities and their indirect impact on firm performance
Protogerou, A., Caloghirou, Y., & Lioukas, S. (2012) · Industrial and Corporate Change · doi:10.1093/icc/dtr049 · Cited by 503
Assessing a Multidimensional Measure of Radical Technological Innovation
Green, S. G., Gavin, M. B., & Aiman-Smith, L. (1995) · IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management · doi:10.1109/17.403738 · Cited by 457
Kapoor, R., & Agarwal, S. (2017) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2017.1122 · Cited by 453
The slow pace of rapid technological change: gradualism and punctuation in technological change
LEVINTHAL, D. A. (1998) · Industrial and Corporate Change · doi:10.1093/icc/7.2.217 · Cited by 452
The fruit flies of innovations: a taxonomy of innovative small firms
de Jong, J. P. J., & Marsili, O. (2006) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2005.09.007 · Cited by 445
Macrocultures: Determinants and Consequences
Abrahamson, E., & Fombrun, C. J. (1994) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1994.9412190217 · Cited by 444
The Role of Environmental Dynamics in Building a First Mover Advantage Theory
Suarez, F. F., & Lanzolla, G. (2007) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2007.24349587 · Cited by 438
Capron, L., & Mitchell, W. (2009) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1070.0328 · Cited by 430
Towards a theory of the technology-based firm
Granstrand, O. (1998) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(98)00067-5 · Cited by 418
Disruptiveness of innovations: measurement and an assessment of reliability and validity
Govindarajan, V., & Kopalle, P. K. (2006) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.511 · Cited by 410
Risky Business? Entrepreneurship in the New Independent-Power Sector
Sine, W. D., Haveman, H. A., & Tolbert, P. S. (2005) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2189/asqu.2005.50.2.200 · Cited by 383
Simsek, Z., Fox, B. C., & Heavey, C. (2015) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206314553276 · Cited by 352
The Economic Sociology of Conventions: Habit, Custom, Practice, and Routine in Market Order
Biggart, N. W., & Beamish, T. D. (2003) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.29.010202.100051 · Cited by 345
Lee, Y., & Colarelli O'Connor, G. (2003) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/1540-5885.t01-1-201002 · Cited by 348
Key Characteristics of the Large Innovating Firm*
Pavitt, K. (1991) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.1991.tb00014.x · Cited by 347
Global value chains from a 3D printing perspective
Laplume, A. O., Petersen, B., & Pearce, J. M. (2016) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/jibs.2015.47 · Cited by 347
Fixation and creativity in concept development: The attitudes and practices of expert designers
Crilly, N. (2015) · Design Studies · doi:10.1016/j.destud.2015.01.002 · Cited by 330
Souto, J. E. (2015) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2015.05.017 · Cited by 324
Organizational Learning, Innovation and Internationalization: A Complex System Model
Chiva, R., Ghauri, P., & Alegre, J. (2014) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/1467-8551.12026 · Cited by 291
A Selective Review of Time Assumptions in Strategy Research
Mosakowski, E., & Earley, P. C. (2000) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259207 · Cited by 279
Liminal movement by digital platform‐based sharing economy ventures: The case of Uber Technologies
Garud, R., Kumaraswamy, A., Roberts, A., & Xu, L. (2022) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.3148 · Cited by 274
Defining and identifying disruptive innovations
Nagy, D., Schuessler, J., & Dubinsky, A. (2016) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.11.017 · Cited by 260
Cattani, G. (2006) · Industrial and Corporate Change · doi:10.1093/icc/dtj016 · Cited by 251
The paradox of new venture legitimation within an entrepreneurial ecosystem
Kuratko, D. F., Fisher, G., Bloodgood, J. M., & Hornsby, J. S. (2017) · Small Business Economics · doi:10.1007/s11187-017-9870-x · Cited by 244
Sine, W. D., David, R. J., & Mitsuhashi, H. (2007) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1070.0300 · Cited by 241
Garud, R. (2008) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00783.x · Cited by 236
Grammatical Models of Organizational Processes
Pentland, B. T. (1995) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.6.5.541 · Cited by 233
Hall, J., & Wagner, M. (2012) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.728 · Cited by 227
Disruption in Platform‐Based Ecosystems
Ozalp, H., Cennamo, C., & Gawer, A. (2018) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12351 · Cited by 223
Vest, J. R., & Gamm, L. D. (2009) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-4-35 · Cited by 216
Environmental munificence for entrepreneurs: entrepreneurial alertness and commitment
Tang, J. (2008) · International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research · doi:10.1108/13552550810874664 · Cited by 205
Convergence Versus Strategic Reorientation: The Antecedents of Fast-paced Organizational Change
Gordon, S. S., Stewart, W. H., Sweo, R., & Luker, W. A. (2000) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920630002600508 · Cited by 189
Multi-mode interaction among technologies
Pistorius, C. W. I., & Utterback, J. M. (1997) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(96)00916-x · Cited by 175
Technology-based, “adolescent” firm configurations
Bantel, K. A. (1998) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/s0883-9026(97)00033-5 · Cited by 176
Building the Value of Next-Generation Platforms: The Paradox of Diminishing Returns
Cennamo, C. (2018) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206316658350 · Cited by 173
Rietveld, J., Ploog, J. N., & Nieborg, D. B. (2020) · Academy of Management Discoveries · doi:10.5465/amd.2019.0064 · Cited by 151
On the role of outsiders in technical development
Van De Poel, I. (2000) · Technology Analysis & Strategic Management · doi:10.1080/09537320050130615 · Cited by 148
Wesseling, J. H., Niesten, E. M. M. I., Faber, J., & Hekkert, M. P. (2015) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.1834 · Cited by 128
Co-evolution of waste and electricity regimes: Multi-regime dynamics in the Netherlands (1969–2003)
Raven, R. (2007) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2006.07.005 · Cited by 126
Organizational Capabilities in Complex Worlds
Levinthal, D. A. (2001) · The Nature and Dynamics of Organizational Capabilities · doi:10.1093/0199248540.003.0014 · Cited by 112
Metadata
- Authors
- Tushman, M. L., & Anderson, P.
- Venue
- Administrative Science Quarterly
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1986-09
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 439
- ISSN
- 0001-8392 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2099670044
- Cited by
- 6,112
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
