Cited by 1,248Memory and Neural MechanismsMemory Processes and InfluencesPosttraumatic Stress Disorder Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Preventing the return of fear in humans using reconsolidation update mechanisms

Open access

Abstract

Recent research on changing fears has examined targeting reconsolidation. During reconsolidation, stored information is rendered labile after being retrieved. Pharmacological manipulations at this stage result in an inability to retrieve the memories at later times, suggesting that they are erased or persistently inhibited. Unfortunately, the use of these pharmacological manipulations in humans can be problematic. Here we introduce a non-invasive technique to target the reconsolidation of fear memories in humans. We provide evidence that old fear memories can be updated with non-fearful information provided during the reconsolidation window. As a consequence, fear responses are no longer expressed, an effect that lasted at least a year and was selective only to reactivated memories without affecting others. These findings demonstrate the adaptive role of reconsolidation as a window of opportunity to rewrite emotional memories, and suggest a non-invasive technique that can be used safely in humans to prevent the return of fear.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature08637

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 33 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Schiller, D., Monfils, M.-H., Raio, C. M., Johnson, D. C., LeDoux, J. E., & Phelps, E. A.
Affiliations
  • New York University (US)
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Corresponding author
Phelps, Elizabeth A.
Venue
Nature
Published
2009-12-09
Volume
463
Issue
7277
Pages
49-53
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2100172973
Cited by
1,248
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 38 · 2025: 54 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 68 · 2021: 66 · 2020: 75 · 2019: 90 · 2018: 102 · 2017: 97 · 2016: 85 · 2015: 115 · 2014: 91 · 2013: 87 · 2012: 76
FWCI
30.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
addendum (2018-07-26)
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R37MH038774, P50MH058911, R21MH072279, K05MH067048, R01MH038774, R01MH046516, R01MH091147)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Keywords
fear memory reconsolidation, fear extinction, memory updating, return of fear, post-traumatic stress disorder, anxiety disorders, emotional memory
MeSH terms
Conditioning, Classical, Cues, Electrodes, Electroshock, Extinction, Psychological, Fear, Humans, Memory, Models, Neurological, Models, Psychological, Neuronal Plasticity, Photic Stimulation, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review