Cited by 384Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model OrganismsPI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancerAutophagy in Disease and Therapy

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 257 of the 257 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 185 of the 240 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

Targeting the biology of aging with mTOR inhibitors

Open access

Abstract

Inhibition of the protein kinase mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved therapeutic rapamycin promotes health and longevity in diverse model organisms. More recently, specific inhibition of mTORC1 to treat aging-related conditions has become the goal of basic and translational scientists, clinicians and biotechnology companies. Here, we review the effects of rapamycin on the longevity and survival of both wild-type mice and mouse models of human diseases. We discuss recent clinical trials that have explored whether existing mTOR inhibitors can safely prevent, delay or treat multiple diseases of aging. Finally, we discuss how new molecules may provide routes to the safer and more selective inhibition of mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1) in the decade ahead. We conclude by discussing what work remains to be done and the questions that will need to be addressed to make mTOR inhibitors part of the standard of care for diseases of aging.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s43587-023-00416-y

Cites

257 of 257 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

55 Partly supported · 41 Supported · 27 Own interpretation · 19 Not checked yet · 9 No full text of the sources · 6 No basis given · 3 Supported so far · 1 Couldn’t confirm · 1 Sources not found · accuracy not yet measured

Verify all 17 references — free account

Show all 91 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 61
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 14
71 of 71
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Preclinical data on mTOR inhibition and aging in mice are predictive of benefits for human aging.

    “Given the extensive preclinical data confirming that mTOR inhibition extends lifespan and healthspan, there is great interest in determining whether mTOR inhibitors will have benefits for human aging.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Local administration of rapamycin with negligible systemic exposure poses fewer safety risks than systemic administration.

    “Local administration of rapamycin with negligible systemic exposure poses fewer safety risks than systemic administration.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The largest planned geroprotective study will study at most 150 subjects and the longest planned study is 18 months.

    “A weakness of these planned studies is that even the largest will be studying a maximum of only 150 subjects, and the longest planned study is 18 months.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Any dietary intervention will have issues with adherence.

    “Of course, any dietary intervention will have issues with adherence, and pharmaceutical interventions can make mTOR inhibition to a much broader swath of the population.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Pharmaceutical interventions can make mTOR inhibition available to a much broader swath of the population.

    “Of course, any dietary intervention will have issues with adherence, and pharmaceutical interventions can make mTOR inhibition to a much broader swath of the population.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    mTORC1 activity is regulated by amino acids, while mTORC2 activity is not.

    “In particular, since mTORC1 activity is regulated by amino acids, while mTORC2 activity is not, reducing the content of dietary protein or specific dietary amino acids that normally stimulate mTORC1 activity has been explored as a way promote healthy aging.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The GATOR complexes are regulated by levels of amino acids, cholesterol, and glycolytic intermediates, linking mTORC1 activity to nutrient availability.

    “The GATOR complexes are regulated by levels of amino acids, cholesterol, and glycolytic intermediates, thus linking mTORC1 activity to nutrient availability.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Three different amino acid sensors regulate mTORC1 activity by controlling GATOR1 or GATOR2 activity.

    “Three different amino acid sensors have been found that regulate mTORC1 activity by controlling GATOR1 or GATOR 2 activity.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    mTORC1 activity depends upon the interaction of the mTOR protein kinase with GTP-bound Rheb.

    “At the lysosomal surface, mTORC1 activity depends upon the interaction of the mTOR protein kinase with GTP-found Rheb.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    TSC inhibits mTORC1 activity by acting as a GAP for Rheb.

    “At the lysosomal surface the Tuberous Sclerosis Complex (TSC) inhibits mTORC1 activity by acting as a GAP for Rheb.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Higher doses (e.g., 3 mg/day) of mTOR inhibitors such as everolimus inhibit T-cell function.

    “In humans, higher doses (e.g., 3 mg/day) of mTOR inhibitors such as everolimus inhibit T-cell function, and are therefore are used to suppress immune-mediated organ transplant rejection in patients.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    A 6-fold lower dose of everolimus for 6 weeks is associated with improved immune function as assessed by vaccination response.

    “In contrast, a 6-fold lower dose of everolimus for 6 weeks was associated with improved immune function as assessed by vaccination response.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The lower the dose of a drug, the fewer expected side effects.

    “Thus, both dose and duration may contribute to whether mTOR inhibition has positive or negative effects on healthy aging; but generally speaking, the lower the dose of a drug, the fewer expected side effects.”
13 of 13

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

1 of 1

Citations

Cites

Show all 256 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–384 of 384

Metadata

Authors
Mannick, J. B., & Lamming, D. W.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Lamming, Dudley W.
Venue
Nature Aging
Published
2023-05-04
Volume
3
Issue
6
Pages
642-660
ISSN
2662-8465 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4368374116
Cited by
372
References
256
Citations by year
2026: 103 · 2025: 135 · 2024: 116 · 2023: 18
FWCI
4.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Aging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute on Aging (AG056771, AG062328, AG061635 and AG076941)
  • U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK125859)
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (BX004031)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancer
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
Keywords
mTOR inhibitors, rapamycin, mTORC1, aging, longevity, age-related diseases, clinical trials, mouse model, drug safety
MeSH terms
Mechanistic Target of Rapamycin Complex 1, MTOR Inhibitors, Aging, Animals, Biology, Humans, United States, Sirolimus, Mice, TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-09, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-09 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review