The DOI matches its Crossref record; 257 of the 257 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 70 of the 187 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Two-photon interference: the Hong–Ou–Mandel effect
Open accessAbstract
Nearly 30 years ago, two-photon interference was observed, marking the beginning of a new quantum era. Indeed, two-photon interference has no classical analogue, giving it a distinct advantage for a range of applications. The peculiarities of quantum physics may now be used to our advantage to outperform classical computations, securely communicate information, simulate highly complex physical systems and increase the sensitivity of precise measurements. This separation from classical to quantum physics has motivated physicists to study two-particle interference for both fermionic and bosonic quantum objects. So far, two-particle interference has been observed with massive particles, among others, such as electrons and atoms, in addition to plasmons, demonstrating the extent of this effect to larger and more complex quantum systems. A wide array of novel applications to this quantum effect is to be expected in the future. This review will thus cover the progress and applications of two-photon (two-particle) interference over the last three decades.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This review covers the Hong–Ou–Mandel (HOM) effect, or two-photon/two-particle interference, over roughly three decades since its observation. It surveys the underlying beam-splitter theory and applications in precision measurement, quantum state analysis and engineering, communication, computation, multipartite interference, and non-photonic systems.
Key findings
- The HOM effect produces destructive interference of two-photon states exiting opposite output ports of a 50:50 beam splitter, giving the hallmark coincidence dip; for indistinguishable photons the output is \((|2_c\rangle - |2_d\rangle)/\sqrt{2}\).
- Precision applications include HOM timing measurements with reported average accuracy of 6 attoseconds and average precision of 16 attoseconds, and quantum optical coherence tomography with an improvement in resolution by a factor of 5 compared to OCT and detection of 1 µm features.
- Linear-optics Bell-state discrimination is limited to 50% success with one beam splitter and two detectors, but can be raised to 75% with ancillary entanglement and generally to \(1 - 2^{-N}\) with \(N\) interferences; KLM-type CZ and CNOT gates have success probabilities of 2/27 and 1/16, respectively.
- Non-photonic HOM interference has been observed with plasmons (initial visibility \(0.43 \pm 0.02\), later up to 0.95), phonons (\(0.52 \pm 0.03\)), collective atomic excitations (\(0.89 \pm 0.06\)), atoms (Rb bunching exceeding distinguishable-atom probability by 6 standard deviations; He visibility \(0.65 \pm 0.07\)), and electrons via anti-bunching/Pauli dips.
Methods
- Design: narrative review article, not a primary experimental study; it aggregates “the most prevalent uses of two-photon interference over the past three decades” into a coherent text.
- Data/sample: cited theoretical and experimental literature on HOM interference, including photonic, plasmonic, phononic, atomic, and electronic systems.
- Main analysis: thematic synthesis beginning with beam-splitter and two-photon interference theory, then covering precision measurements, quantum state analysis, quantum communication, quantum state engineering, quantum computation, multipartite/multimode generalizations, and non-photonic implementations.
Limitations
- The paper does not state a formal limitations section.
- Text-evident limitation: as a broad review, it does not provide a systematic search or selection protocol for the literature covered.
- Text-evident limitations in cited experiments include the initial plasmonic HOM dip visibility being below the classical limit, phonon results having statistical significance too small to exclude classical explanations with certainty, and QOCT facing challenges such as low signal and signal artifacts.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
70 of 187 cited sources checked · 3 supported · 7 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
Some cited sources support this claim and some don’t — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“In the works mentioned above, a noncommon-path HOM interferometer is employed to measure time shifts with resolutions on the order of a few femto-seconds (micrometers), where the time shifts are obtained by assessing the shift of the HOM dip.”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > A. Precise Timing Measurement
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [16] Moschandreou, 2018, Experimental study of Hong–Ou–Mandel interference using independent phase randomized weak coherent states, J. Lightwave Technol. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction describes a HOM coincidence dip, but does not say it was used to measure time shifts. The Experimental Setup reports coincidence measurements and an 81-ps time-interval analyzer; a search for femtosecond resolution, noncommon-path time-shift measurement, and shifts of the HOM dip found no supporting passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)
- Disputedcites [17] Kim, 2020, Hong–Ou–Mandel interference of two independent continuous-wave coherent photons, Photon. Res. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results report that this paper’s time-resolved HOM interference is not affected by temporal delay between the input photons; adding optical delay lines did not shift or degrade the interference. Its reported detection-time bin is 0.5 ns, not a few femtoseconds. This experiment therefore does not measure input time shifts by tracking a HOM-dip shift as the citing sentence claims. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
- Partly supportedcites [18] Ferreira da Silva, 2013, Proof-of-principle demonstration of measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution using polarization qubits, Phys. Rev. A sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results and Discussions section reports scanning the relative pulse delay and recording a HOM dip, which supports the time-shift measurement aspect. It gives a dip width of 2.40 ns, but does not describe a noncommon-path HOM interferometer or report resolution of a few femtoseconds. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Could not verify
At least one cited source doesn’t support this claim or points to a different paper, and none confirmed it — see the verdicts below.
In the paper
“The resulting probability of finding two indistinguishable atoms in one trap exceeded the probability for distinguishable atoms by 6 standard deviations”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > D. Atoms
What the sources say
- Disputedcites [190] Metcalf, 2013, Multiphoton quantum interference in a multiport integrated photonic device, Nat. Commun. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The section “Demonstrating genuinely quantum operation and circuit complexity” describes interference experiments with photons in an integrated circuit, not atoms in a trap. It reports that one measured visibility exceeded a classical limit by more than one standard deviation, not that a two-atom trap probability exceeded another by six standard deviations. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Disputed
At least one cited source doesn’t support this claim or points to a different paper, and none confirmed it — see the verdicts below.
In the paper
“Recently, this deficiency was resolved by an improved experiment, using two separate sources of single electrons emitted from a triggered quantum dot [197,198].”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > E. Electrons
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [197] Spring, 2012, Boson sampling on a photonic chip, Science source
- Disputedcites [198] Tillmann, 2013, Experimental boson sampling, Nat. Photon. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Experiment section (p. 2) says the input was generated by spontaneous parametric down-conversion, and Methods (pp. 4–5) describes photon pairs produced in a BBO crystal. The cited experiment used photons, not single electrons emitted from two triggered quantum-dot sources. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesAt least one cited source doesn’t support this claim or points to a different paper, and none confirmed it — see the verdicts below.
In the paper
“Recently, such a two-phonon interference effect has been observed involving two trapped ions [181].”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > B. Phonons
What the sources say
- Disputedcites [181] Poem, 2012, Two-photon path-entangled states in multimode waveguides, Phys. Rev. Lett. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Abstract (page unavailable) describes an experiment on two-photon interference in multimode optical waveguides, not two-phonon interference involving trapped ions. The experimental-system passage describes laser light and photon-pair generation, rather than an ion-trap experiment. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes- Disputed
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“Several realizations of the RRDPS protocol have recently been demonstrated experimentally using time-bin phase encoding [103][104][105][106] and using transverse spatial modes [107].”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > C. Passive round-robin differential phase shift QKD
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [103] Pirandola, 2019, Advances in quantum cryptography sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The copy’s section C, “Differential phase shift QKD,” describes experimental implementations of differential phase-shift QKD, but does not identify them as RRDPS. Searches for “RRDPS,” “round-robin differential phase shift,” and “transverse spatial modes” found no passage establishing the claimed RRDPS demonstrations. The copy is truncated, so relevant text may be missing. (LLM, conf=0.72)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [104] Wootters, 1982, A single quantum cannot be cloned, Nature source
- Could not verifycites [105] Shor, 2000, Simple proof of security of the bb84 quantum key distribution protocol, Phys. Rev. Lett. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Protocol 3: BB84 discussion (p. 4) concerns BB84 security and mentions experimental quantum key distribution systems only in general. Searches for RRDPS, time-bin phase encoding, transverse spatial modes, and experimental demonstrations found no passage addressing the claimed realizations. (LLM, conf=0.76)
- Could not verifycites [106] Zukowski, 1993, ‘Event-ready-detectors’ Bell experiment via entanglement swapping, Phys. Rev. Lett. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Abstract describes a proposed event-ready Bell experiment using entanglement swapping, not an experimental realization of RRDPS. Searches for RRDPS, time-bin phase encoding, and transverse spatial modes found no passage addressing the claimed demonstrations. (LLM, conf=0.78)
- Could not verifycites [107] Bennett, 1993, Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen channels, Phys. Rev. Lett. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The passages labeled Abstract discuss quantum teleportation using EPR pairs and classical communication, not experimental RRDPS implementations. Searches for RRDPS, time-bin phase encoding, and transverse spatial modes found no passage addressing the claim; page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes- Could not verify
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Moreover, for the same bandwidth, QOCT benefits from an extra factor of 2 in resolution compared to classical OCT.”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > B. Quantum Optical Coherence Tomography
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [24] Dowling, 2008, Quantum optical metrology—the lowdown on high-N00N states, Contemp. Phys. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Section 6, “Quantum Imaging and Sensing” (page not provided), reports a factor-of-two improvement in resolving power for quantum coherence tomography. It does not specify that the comparison with classical OCT is at the same bandwidth, so that qualifier is not established by our copy. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Partly supported
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“In order to overcome the impracticality of this scheme, the measurement-device-independent (MDI) QKD protocol has been proposed [84], where all detector side channels attacks are now removed.”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > B. Measurement device independent QKD
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [84] Chaneliere, 2007, Quantum interference of electromagnetic fields from remote quantum memories, Phys. Rev. Lett. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The supplied Abstract passages describe Hong–Ou–Mandel interference between fields from remote atomic memories, not an MDI-QKD protocol. Searches of our copy for MDI QKD, detector side-channel attacks, and QKD detector security found no passage addressing the attributed claim. The passages have no page labels in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes- Could not verify
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“An example of a 3-dimensional image taken via QOCT for the skin of an onion coated in gold is shown in Fig. 3; this result indicates a resolution of 1 µm.”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > B. Quantum Optical Coherence Tomography
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [33] Raymer, 2010, Interference of two photons of different color, Opt. Commun. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The paper’s Conclusions discuss interference between photons of different colors and frequency conversion, not QOCT imaging. Searches for QOCT, onion skin, gold nanoparticles, and a 1 µm imaging resolution found no passage addressing the claimed image or resolution. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes- Could not verify
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“For example, an arbitrary polarization qubit |1 s = α |1 H + β |1 V , where |α| 2 + |β| 2 = 1, can be optimally cloned using the HOM effect by interfering it on a beam splitter with an ancilla that is in a maximally mixed polarization state”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > B. Universal optimal quantum cloning and NOT gate
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [114] Narla, 2016, Robust concurrent remote entanglement between two superconducting qubits, Phys. Rev. X sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Overview of Experiment and Protocol describes microwave photons interfering at a beam-splitter equivalent, and the Error Analysis mentions Hong–Ou–Mandel interference. Neither passage addresses cloning a polarization qubit with a maximally mixed ancilla. Searches for optimal cloning, polarization, and a mixed-state ancilla found no passage supporting that claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)
- Partly supportedcites [115] Sangouard, 2011, Quantum repeaters based on atomic ensembles and linear optics, Rev. Mod. Phys. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The section on entanglement creation and swapping based on two-photon detections describes HOM interference when photons meet at a beam splitter. It does not say that this effect optimally clones an arbitrary polarization qubit or describe an ancilla in a maximally mixed polarization state. (LLM, conf=0.83)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [116] Briegel, 1998, Quantum repeaters: the role of imperfect local operations in quantum communication, Phys. Rev. Lett. source
- Could not verifycites [117] Fung, 2007, Phase-remapping attack in practical quantum-key-distribution systems, Phys. Rev. A sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The section on intercept-and-resend attacks discusses quantum-state discrimination, while Appendix A addresses QBER minimization; neither describes polarization-qubit cloning. Searches for HOM interference, a beam splitter, and a maximally mixed ancilla found no passage addressing the claimed procedure. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.74)
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Could not verify
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“In order to overcome the difficulties in achieving stable variable-delay interferometers, a passive version of the RRDPS QKD was proposed [85].”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > C. Passive round-robin differential phase shift QKD
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [85] Yuan, 2007, Synchronized independent narrow-band single photons and efficient generation of photonic entanglement, Phys. Rev. Lett. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The paper describes synchronized single-photon sources and photonic entanglement (p. 1), not a passive RRDPS QKD proposal. Searches for RRDPS, passive QKD, and variable-delay interferometers found no passage addressing the attributed claim. (LLM, conf=0.75)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes- Could not verify
- It may state two separate claims as one. 59
- Probably not a substantial claim. 54
Some cited sources support this claim and some don’t — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“different experiments using different plasmonic configurations, and off-chip photon detection schemes achieved visibilities far beyond the classical limit up to 0.95 [183][184][185][186], thus fully certifying the quantumness of the two plasmon interferences.”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > A. Plasmons
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [183] Politi, 2009, Integrated quantum photonics, IEEE J. Select. Top. Quantum Electron. source
- Partly supportedcites [184] Peruzzo, 2010, Quantum walks of correlated photons, Science sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The 'Quantum walks of correlated particles' section (pp. 2, 5) describes off-chip photon detection and two-photon correlations that violate a classical limit by up to 76 standard deviations. It studies photons in a waveguide chip, not plasmons in plasmonic configurations, and does not report interference visibility of 0.95. (LLM, conf=0.88)
- Partly supportedcites [185] Poulios, 2014, Quantum walks of correlated photon pairs in two-dimensional waveguide arrays, Phys. Rev. Lett. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Fig. 4 passage (indexed under Abstract; page unavailable) reports 96.8 ± 2.5% visibility, and the discussion of Fig. 3 reports violations of a classical limit. But this is an experiment with photon pairs in fused-silica waveguides, not two-plasmon interference in plasmonic configurations; it also does not report a maximum visibility of 0.95. (LLM, conf=0.88)
- Disputedcites [186] Owens, 2011, Two-photon quantum walks in an elliptical direct-write waveguide array, New J. Phys. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Section 4, “Two-photon walks” (page not provided), reports photon interference visibility of 38 ± 2%, not 0.95, in a waveguide array rather than a plasmonic configuration. Section 5, “Discussion” (page not provided), explicitly says the resulting probability distributions did not exhibit a conclusively quantum signature, contrary to the claim of full certification. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
Some cited sources support this claim and some don’t — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Although tritters have been used to demonstrate quantum features in the two-photon regime [138,142,143], only recently have three photon HOM coalescences been observed [141,144].”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > A. Three-photon interferences in a Bell-tritter
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [138] Zhang, 2016, Engineering two-photon high-dimensional states through quantum interference, Sci. Adv. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction and Results report two-photon HOM interference and quantum-state measurements, supporting the two-photon aspect of the cited clause. But Materials and Methods identify the device as a 50:50 beamsplitter, not a tritter; this paper therefore does not support the claim that tritters were used. (LLM, conf=0.84)
- Could not verifycites [142] Nagali, 2010, Experimental optimal cloning of four-dimensional quantum states of photons, Phys. Rev. Lett. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The experimental-layout passage reports HOM interference between two photons at a balanced beam splitter, and the Fig. 2 and Fig. 3 captions likewise identify two-photon coalescence. Searches for tritters and three-photon HOM coalescence found no passage in our copy addressing either attributed claim; the paper's two-photon result does not establish a tritter experiment. (LLM, conf=0.76)
- Disputedcites [143] Bouchard, 2017, High-dimensional quantum cloning and applications to quantum hacking, Sci. Adv. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The citation is attached to the claim about observed three-photon HOM coalescence. The Results (Fig. 1) describe HOM coalescence curves for two photons, and Materials and Methods specifies a two-photon interference experiment at a 50:50 beam splitter; this paper reports a two-photon observation, not a three-photon one. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
- Could not verifycites [141] Navez, 2003, Cloning a real d-dimensional quantum state on the edge of the no-signaling condition, Phys. Rev. A sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction and Discussion and Conclusion discuss quantum cloning and no-signaling, not tritters or photon interference. Searches for tritters, two-photon experiments, and three-photon Hong–Ou–Mandel coalescence found no passage addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.78)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [144] De Martini, 2002, Experimental realization of the quantum universal not gate, Nature source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
At least one cited source doesn’t support this claim or points to a different paper, and none confirmed it — see the verdicts below.
In the paper
“They have also been experimentally realized with fused optical fibers [138] and more recently with passive [141] and active integrated waveguide circuits [142].”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > A. Three-photon interferences in a Bell-tritter
What the sources say
- Disputedcites [138] Zhang, 2016, Engineering two-photon high-dimensional states through quantum interference, Sci. Adv. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The citation [142] is attached to the claim about active integrated waveguide circuits. Materials and Methods (page unavailable) describes this paper’s experimental apparatus as a beamsplitter-and-mirrors filter with Dove prisms and spatial light modulators, rather than an integrated waveguide circuit. The paper therefore does not describe the realization attributed to it. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
- Could not verifycites [141] Navez, 2003, Cloning a real d-dimensional quantum state on the edge of the no-signaling condition, Phys. Rev. A sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction and Discussion and Conclusion address quantum cloning fidelity and no-signaling, not experimental Bell-port implementations. Searches for Bell-ports, fused optical fibers, and integrated waveguide circuits found no relevant passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)
- Could not verifycites [142] Nagali, 2010, Experimental optimal cloning of four-dimensional quantum states of photons, Phys. Rev. Lett. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The experimental-layout section describes single-mode fibers used to deliver and detect photons, and beam splitters used in a ququart-cloning experiment. It does not describe Bell-ports realized with fused optical fibers. Searches for “Bell-ports” and “fused optical fibers” found no passage addressing the realization attributed to this source; the waveguide-circuit claims carry separate citations. (LLM, conf=0.74)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Disputed
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“The Heisenberg uncertainty principle and the no-cloning theorem [79] are the basis of security when encoding information on single photons, since any type of eavesdropping results in disturbances of the photonic quantum states.”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > IV. QUANTUM COMMUNICATION
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [79] Flagg, 2010, Interference of single photons from two separate semiconductor quantum dots, Phys. Rev. Lett. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The supplied passages and searches for the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, no-cloning, and eavesdropping discuss single-photon interference and quantum-information applications, but not security from eavesdropping. Our copy therefore does not address the claim attributed to this paper (passages labeled Abstract; page unavailable). (LLM, conf=0.77)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Could not verify
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“Higher success rates can be achieved with nonlinear optics [73], entanglement in auxiliary modes [74,75], or feed-forward techniques [76].”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > B. Bell state measurements
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [73] Nagata, 2007, Beating the standard quantum limit with four-entangled photons, Science sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The paper’s discussion of the four-photon interferometer and its results (main text, Fig. 3; page not provided) concerns phase sensitivity, not Bell-state discrimination. Its discussion of distinguishing two four-photon input states (main text, Fig. 2, and Additional information; pages not provided) does not address whether auxiliary-mode entanglement improves Bell-state discrimination success rates. Searches for Bell-state discrimination, auxiliary modes, nonlinear optics, and feed-forward found no passage supporting the attributed point. (LLM, conf=0.76)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [74] Afek, 2010, High-N00N states by mixing quantum and classical light, Science source
- Could not verifycites [75] Zhou, 2017, Superresolving phase measurement with short-wavelength noon states by quantum frequency up-conversion, Phys. Rev. Appl. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Only the nonlinear-optics portion of the citing sentence is attributed to this source [73]. The paper’s experimental passages describe sum-frequency up-conversion and NOON-state phase measurements, but do not address whether nonlinear optics increases Bell-state discrimination success rates. A Bell-state measurement appears in the References, not as a finding of this paper. (LLM, conf=0.76)
- Could not verifycites [76] Kaltenbaek, 2006, Experimental interference of independent photons, Phys. Rev. Lett. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Abstract reports interference between photons from independent sources, and the experimental description reports interference visibility, not Bell-state discrimination success rates. Searches for nonlinear optics, auxiliary-mode entanglement, and feed-forward techniques found no passage in our copy linking them to higher discrimination success rates. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Could not verify
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Upon exiting the beam splitter, the symmetric component, Ψ + i j , of the input state will reseult in two photons being detected in one of the output ports, while the antisymmetric component, Ψ - i j , will result in one photon being detected in each output port.”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > A. Entanglement engineering
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [111] Guan, 2015, Experimental passive round-robin differential phase-shift quantum key distribution, Phys. Rev. Lett. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The passage following Eq. (3) (indexed under Abstract; page unavailable) says that equal pulse phases produce two clicks at the same detector, while different phases produce clicks at different detectors. The copy does not identify those cases as the symmetric Ψ+ and antisymmetric Ψ− components of the input state, so that identification is not established by this source. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“Another particularity of the two-photon interference is its inherent dispersion cancellation, which does not occur in the case of the one-photon interference, or the interference of classical light.”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > B. Quantum Optical Coherence Tomography
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [22] Einstein, 1935, Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?, Phys. Rev. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Section 2 discusses measurements and wave functions of two systems, not photon interference. Searches for two-photon interference and dispersion cancellation found no passage addressing either the claimed effect or its comparison with one-photon and classical-light interference. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Could not verify
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“One such solution is known as the full device independent QKD [95,96], where the security can be proven without any knowledge of the devices used in the implementation.”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > B. Measurement device independent QKD
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [95] Lettow, 2010, Quantum interference of tunably indistinguishable photons from remote organic molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The paper’s Abstract describes an experiment on two-photon interference from remote organic molecules, not device-independent QKD. Searches for device-independent quantum key distribution, security without knowledge of devices, and related QKD terms found no passage addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.78)
- Could not verifycites [96] Calsamiglia, 2001, Maximum efficiency of a linear-optical Bell-state analyzer, Appl. Phys. B sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction and Conclusions discuss photonic Bell-state measurements and the efficiency of a linear-optical analyzer, not QKD security. Searches for device-independent QKD and security without knowledge of implementation devices found no passage addressing that claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Could not verify
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Beyond quantum cryptography, many quantum communication schemes-such as entanglement swapping [81], quantum teleportation [82], and dense-coding [83]-are also based on the concept of entanglement.”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > IV. QUANTUM COMMUNICATION
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [81] Wei, 2014, Deterministic and robust generation of single photons from a single quantum dot with 99.5% indistinguishability using adiabatic rapid passage, Nano Lett. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The introduction (p. 1) identifies quantum teleportation as an example of photonic quantum information processing, and the conclusion (p. 4) discusses generating entangled photons. Our copy does not say that teleportation depends on entanglement or address entanglement swapping or dense-coding, so it supports only part of the attributed statement. (LLM, conf=0.77)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [82] Senellart, 2017, High-performance semiconductor quantum-dot single-photon sources, Nat. Nanotechnol. source
- Supportedcites [83] Felinto, 2006, Conditional control of the quantum states of remote atomic memories for quantum networking, Nat. Phys. source
The citation [81] is attached specifically to entanglement swapping, not to teleportation or dense coding. The paper’s opening discussion states that quantum repeaters distribute entanglement by swapping across a chain of entangled pairs (page not supplied). (LLM, conf=0.93)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Partly supported
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“Not long after its proposal, QOCT was experimentally demonstrated, achieving an improvement in resolution by a factor of 5 compared to OCT [25].”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > B. Quantum Optical Coherence Tomography
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [25] Kok, 2007, Linear optical quantum computing with photonic qubits, Rev. Mod. Phys. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Abstract and VI. OUTLOOK: BEYOND LINEAR OPTICS discuss experiments in linear optical quantum computing, not QOCT. Searches for QOCT, quantum optical coherence tomography, and the claimed fivefold resolution improvement found no passage in our copy addressing the claim; page numbers were unavailable. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Could not verify
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“can be used to perform quantum simulations [159,160]”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > B. Mulitphotons in general multiports
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [159] O’brien, 2009, Photonic quantum technologies, Nat. Photon. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Quantum information processing section (p. 2) discusses photonic quantum computing and optical networks, but not bipartite quantum walks or their use in quantum simulation. Searches for “quantum walks,” “bipartite quantum walk simulation,” and “quantum simulation” found no passage in our copy addressing that use. (LLM, conf=0.74)
- Supportedcites [160] Wang, 2020, Integrated photonic quantum technologies, Nat. Photon. source
The section “On-chip sampling of photons and quantum simulation” (p. 6) says quantum walks can serve as a resource for quantum simulations and describes two-particle quantum walks used to study physical phenomena. The Fig. 5 caption (p. 12) likewise identifies two-particle quantum walks as simulations of physical quantum phenomena. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Could not verify
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“that gives rise to interesting quantum correlation patterns [157,158]”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > B. Mulitphotons in general multiports
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [157] Weimann, 2016, Implementation of quantum and classical discrete fractional fourier transforms, Nat. Commun. source
The Results section (Quantum experiments; page not available in our copy) describes pairs of photons propagating through waveguide arrays and reports distinct two-photon correlation patterns, including a rotated correlation map for path-entangled states. This supports the cited statement about correlation patterns arising from two-particle quantum propagation. (LLM, conf=0.88)
- Could not verifycites [158] Humphreys, 2013, Linear optical quantum computing in a single spatial mode, Phys. Rev. Lett. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The passage labeled Abstract mentions a classical simulation of a quantum random walk, but says nothing about bipartite walks producing quantum correlation patterns. The gate-operation and two-photon passages concern a CPhase gate, not walk-generated correlations. Searches for bipartite quantum walks and two-photon walk correlations found no passage addressing the claim; page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“Waveguides in photonics chips allow for higher portability, higher cost efficiency, and higher robustness [133,134].”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > A. Linear quantum computing
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [133] Yin, 2018, Improved security bound for the round-robin-differential-phase-shift quantum key distribution, Nat. Commun. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results section (Proof-of-principle experiment; page unavailable) discusses beam splitters, Faraday–Michelson interferometers, and detector performance. Although it describes the interferometers as stable against polarization variations, our copy does not address whether waveguides in photonic chips improve portability, cost efficiency, or robustness. Searches for photonic-chip waveguides and related terms found no supporting passage. (LLM, conf=0.78)
- Could not verifycites [134] Bouchard, 2018, Round-robin differential-phase-shift quantum key distribution with twisted photons, Phys. Rev. A sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The paper’s body text, indexed under Abstract (page unavailable), discusses orbital-angular-momentum QKD and says its generation and detection techniques do not require active stabilization. It does not address whether waveguides in photonic chips improve portability, cost efficiency, or robustness; searches for waveguides, integrated photonics, and those claimed benefits found no relevant passage. (LLM, conf=0.75)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Could not verify
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“There are several examples of specific quantum optical implementations that rely on the HOM effect, to list a few: solving systems of linear equations [128,129], computation on encrypted data [130], computing discrete and fractional Fourier transform [131], and computations on a single spatial mode (using temporal modes) [132].”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > A. Linear quantum computing
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [128] Pirandola, 2015, High-rate measurement-device-independent quantum cryptography, Nat. Photon. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion (p. 5) describes a continuous-variable quantum cryptography protocol, and the experimental setup (p. 16) describes optical modes combined for a Bell measurement. Searches for single-spatial-mode computation and temporal modes found no passage addressing that cited part of the sentence or its claimed reliance on the HOM effect. (LLM, conf=0.76)
- Could not verifycites [129] Sasaki, 2014, Practical quantum key distribution protocol without monitoring signal disturbance, Nature sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Abstract describes a quantum key distribution protocol using laser pulse trains, and the practical-implementation description in Additional information describes interference between delayed pulses. Neither passage addresses the HOM effect or computations on a single spatial mode using temporal modes. Searches for HOM-based computation, linear equations, encrypted data, and Fourier transforms found no supporting passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)
- Could not verifycites [130] Takesue, 2015, Experimental quantum key distribution without monitoring signal disturbance, Nat. Photon. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Citation [132] is attached to the example of computations on a single spatial mode using temporal modes. The experimental-setup passage describes temporally delayed interferometers for quantum key distribution, but does not address that computational implementation or its reliance on the HOM effect. Searches for single-spatial-mode computation and HOM-based temporal-mode computation found no supporting passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.75)
- Could not verifycites [131] Wang, 2015, Experimental demonstration of a quantum key distribution without signal disturbance monitoring, Nat. Photon. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The citation is attached to the claim about solving systems of linear equations. The paper’s discussion of its variable-delay interferometer for quantum key distribution does not address that computation or connect it to the HOM effect. Searches for linear equations and HOM interference found no supporting passage in our copy (page numbers unavailable). (LLM, conf=0.77)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Could not verify
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“they have been observed and even brought to twofermionic quantum interference only recently [201].”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > E. Electrons
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [201] Bentivegna, 2015, Experimental scattershot boson sampling, Sci. Adv. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction discusses interference of indistinguishable photons in boson sampling, not levitons. Searches of our copy for levitons and two-fermion interference found no passage addressing their observation or interference; the returned References also concern photons. Page numbers were not available. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Could not verify
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“When the two photons exit through the same port, 2/3 of the time they will have the same polarization state; while 1/3 of the time, they will have orthogonal polarization states, |1 s |1 s ⊥ .”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > B. Universal optimal quantum cloning and NOT gate
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the case of fermionic particles, say electrons, the creation operators will anti-commute, implying that ĉ † d † = -d † ĉ † . Therefore, |1 a |1 b BS -→ |1 c |1 d and the fermions will exit through different output ports.”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > B. Two-Photon Interference
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In this case, we observe destructive interference of the two-photon states corresponding to photons exiting opposite output ports, and constructive interference of the two-photon states corresponding to photons exiting through the same output ports.”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > B. Two-Photon Interference
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“in the last case they also reach the same detector, but they have the same polarizations”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > B. Bell state measurements
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“From Eq. ( 17), we can find the probability for passing the test is 1 + | φ| ψ | 2 /2, and consequently the probability of failing the test is 1 -| φ| ψ | 2 /2.”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > B. The SWAP test
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“two-photon interference has no classical analogue”
- Also stated in: § I. INTRODUCTION · boosted
“with absolutely no analogue in classical physics”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > Abstract
Load-bearingStrength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § I. INTRODUCTION · boosted
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As will be discussed in the upcoming sections, the two-photon interference is fundamental to a plethora of quantum information tasks.”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > II. PRECISION MEASUREMENTS
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“The MDI QKD protocol has been experimentally demonstrated using time-bin phaseencoding [97], and polarization encoding [98].”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > B. Measurement device independent QKD
What the sources say
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We thus require a particle to have enough degrees of freedom to accommodate the information of both incoming states.”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > C. Quantum state joining
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“This process is probabilistic and requires an ancilla state, with a success probability of 1/32, or 1/8 if a suitable feed-forward is used.”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > C. Quantum state joining
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [120] Gerhardt, 2011, Full-field implementation of a perfect eavesdropper on a quantum cryptography system, Nat. Commun. source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not checked yet
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As a result, such a configuration typically yields larger security, better stability, and faster communications.”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > C. Passive round-robin differential phase shift QKD
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The experimental realization of indistinguishable single photon sources with high purity is a crucial component for engineering large-scale entangled quantum states from independent sources, as will be seen in forthcoming sections.”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > A. Mode distinguishability
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This scheme relies on the interaction of two photons, which would require nonlinear optics.”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > C. Quantum state joining
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The inverse process to joining states, known as quantum state splitting, is such that the information on a ququart state (for the above experiment) is split onto two photonic qubits [121].”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > C. Quantum state joining
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [121] Mayers, 1998
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In contrast to the full device independent scheme, MDI QKD protocol still necessitates the assumptions of Alice's and Bob's states generation to be perfect, which is still reasonable for current implementations.”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > B. Measurement device independent QKD
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In particular, the measurement of the HOM visibility is an invaluable diagnostic tool to characterize single photon sources and states.”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > III. QUANTUM STATE ANALYSIS
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Finally, although QOCT offers potential advantages in terms of resolution, new challenges appear, such as low signal and signal artifacts.”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > B. Quantum Optical Coherence Tomography
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Suppose we created the maximally mixed polarization state by using one of the photons from a maximally entangled singlet state.Then 2/3 of the time, the other photon in the singlet state will have the orthogonal polarization of the cloned states, and 1/3 of the time the same polarization.This effectively implements an optimal universal NOT gate [118,119]-itself a non-unitary operation.”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > B. Universal optimal quantum cloning and NOT gate
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [118] Zhao, 2008, Quantum hacking: experimental demonstration of time-shift attack against practical quantum-key-distribution systems, Phys. Rev. A source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- Not checked yetcites [119] Lydersen, 2010, Hacking commercial quantum cryptography systems by tailored bright illumination, Nat. Photon. source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not checked yet
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“At the heart of quantum information is the notion of quantum entanglement [10]-the fundamental resource in quantum communication [11], quantum metrology [12], and quantum computing [13].”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > C. Entangled States
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [10] Hamilton, 2000, Phase shifts in multilayer dielectric beam splitters, Am. J. Phys. source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [11] Paul, 1986, Interference between independent photons, Rev. Mod. Phys. source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [12] Ou, 1989, Fourth-order interference technique for determining the coherence time of a light beam, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Universal quantum computation can be achieved with linear optics, post-selection, single photon sources and detectors, and feed-forward, as was proposed by the KLM protocol [76].”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > A. Linear quantum computing
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [76] Kaltenbaek, 2006, Experimental interference of independent photons, Phys. Rev. Lett. source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not checked yet
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In order to achieve an optimal HOM interference, the attenuated lasers are phase randomized, achieving a maximum HOM visibility of 1/2.”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > B. Measurement device independent QKD
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Two such gates are the control-Z (CZ) and control-NOT (CNOT) gates, which are main components for universal quantum computation.”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > A. Linear quantum computing
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition to being one of the most peculiar phenomenon in quantum optics, two-photon interference is one of the primary tools used in quantum information processing.”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > C. Entangled States
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We cannot distinguish the last two states, |Φ ± , from each other with a simple pair of photon detectors; hence, the success rate of 50%.”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > B. Bell state measurements
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Another key physical principle that is at the heart of quantum communications is entanglement [10].”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > IV. QUANTUM COMMUNICATION
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [10] Hamilton, 2000, Phase shifts in multilayer dielectric beam splitters, Am. J. Phys. source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Formally, it can be represented by a unitary transformation, thus conserving energy and preserving orthogonality between input states.”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > A. Action of the Beam Splitter
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Of course, the HOM effect is not limited to photons, and thus we close the review with implementations in non-photonic systems, such as plasmons, phonons, atoms and electrons.”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > I. INTRODUCTION
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The two-photon interference and Bell state analysis are central concepts in MDI-QKD.”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > B. Measurement device independent QKD
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Instead of measuring the interference of a train of pulses at Bob's stage, Bob generates a reference pulse train, and sends Alice's and his state to a beam splitter.By using such a configuration, Bob takes advantage of the phase stability of the twophoton interference effect.”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > C. Passive round-robin differential phase shift QKD
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“As outlined in [77], an example can be to arrange four beam splitters so that we interfere the original state with another entangled ancillary pair of modes first, and then each of the two pairs of output modes goes through a simple Bell state analyzer.In this way, we can distinguish one of the two states that we could not distinguish before, raising the success rate to 75%.”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > B. Bell state measurements
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [77] Mosley, 2008, Heralded generation of ultrafast single photons in pure quantum states, Phys. Rev. Lett. source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not checked yet
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A heralded single photon source achieving a unity HOM visibility would lead to a higher secret key rate per transmitted photon.”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > B. Measurement device independent QKD
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Thus, new techniques are being investigated in order to exploit the full potential of QOCT [29][30][31][32].”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > B. Quantum Optical Coherence Tomography
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [29] Slussarenko, 2017, Unconditional violation of the shot-noise limit in photonic quantum metrology, Nat. Photon. source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- Not checked yetcites [30] D’Ambrosio, 2019, Tunable two-photon quantum interference of structured light, Phys. Rev. Lett. source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [31] Hiekkamäki, 2020, Single-path two-photon interference effects between spatial modes source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not checked yet
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is precisely this separation from classical to quantum physics that gives two-photon interference a distinct advantage to outperform classical computations, securely communicate information, simulate highly complex physical systems and increase the sensitivity of precise measurements.”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > I. INTRODUCTION
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The RRDPS protocol removes the requirement for signal disturbance monitoring by bounding the amount of information leaked to the eavesdropper, where the bound depends entirely on Alice's generation stage.”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > C. Passive round-robin differential phase shift QKD
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [102] Gisin, 2002, Quantum cryptography, Rev. Mod. Phys. source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, this scheme yields very low secret key rates, and is highly impractical due to several stringent requirements such as near unity detection efficiencies.”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > B. Measurement device independent QKD
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Quantum entanglement inherently deals with the interference of two-photon states, thus hinting to the fact that the HOM effect might play an important role in the engineering and analysis of entangled states.”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > C. Entangled States
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“the so-called “two-way architecture” works by having quantum memories evenly distributed along a communication channel, each memory hosting two atoms that emit photons as described above, one forwards and one backwards along the channel.Mid-way between two memories M 1 M 2 sits a Bell state analyzer that measures the two photons coming from M 1 and M 2 in the Bell basis.”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > A. Teleportation and entanglement swapping
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [89] Sipahigil, 2012, Quantum interference of single photons from remote nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond, Phys. Rev. Lett. source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not checked yet
In the paper
“We have thus created an entangled state of two atoms, which will display non-local correlations as one can verify for example by violating Bell's inequalities [87].”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > A. Teleportation and entanglement swapping
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [87] Chen, 2008, Memory-built-in quantum teleportation with photonic and atomic qubits, Nat. Phys. source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, one can solve this issue either by postselecting on only the measurements that fall within a very narrow time window (but this reduces the total number of successful measurements), or by recording the time difference and feed-forward a phase correction so that every single photon pair will have the same phase.”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > A. Entanglement engineering
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Interestingly, bunching and anti-bunching are typical bosonic and fermionic behaviours, respectively.”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > C. Entangled States
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [14] Kim, 2014, Two-photon interference with continuous-wave multi-mode coherent light, Opt. Express source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not checked yet
In the paper
“The frequency difference ∆ω generates a phase of exp(i∆ω∆t) between the components, which will render the state mixed if unaccounted for because the detection time difference ∆t is random.”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > A. Entanglement engineering
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [112] Hofmann, 2012, Heralded entanglement between widely separated atoms, Science source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Moreover, the MDI scheme has also been demonstrated over long distances through optical fibres [99,100], showing the feasibility of the protocol and its potential for unconditional security.”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > B. Measurement device independent QKD
What the sources say
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Furthermore, Bell state measurements are the gold standard for experimentally measuring maximally entangled states.”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > III. QUANTUM STATE ANALYSIS
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“in all boson sampling tasks, multi-photon as well as multimodal interferences, i.e. generalizations of the original HOM idea, play a crucial role.”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > B. Mulitphotons in general multiports
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“which is useful to probe indistinguishability or to predict the complex device's quantum behaviour [163].”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > B. Mulitphotons in general multiports
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [163] Reck, 1994, Experimental realization of any discrete unitary operator, Phys. Rev. Lett. source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For the two-dimensional case, we can implement a Bell state measurement with a single beamsplitter followed by a detector in each output port, which is equivalent to a destructive SWAP test in the sense that the states get measured and are not available afterwards.”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > B. The SWAP test
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“the results show a clear dip in the cross-correlation measurements with a visibility of 0.65±0.07,which is above the classical limit of 0.5”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > D. Atoms
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [193] Tichy, 2013, Limits to multipartite entanglement generation with bosons and fermions, Phys. Rev. A source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
Load-bearingStrength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not checked yet
In the paper
“it was shown that the usually deleterious losses associated with plasmonic systems might be turned into a advantageous feature when the nanostructures are carefully tuned.”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > A. Plasmons
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [187] Crespi, 2013, Anderson localization of entangled photons in an integrated quantum walk, Nat. Photon. source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“because these initial findings used a continuous stream of electrons, the interference might not exclusively be interpreted as a result from the overlap between two single-electron wave packets.”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > E. Electrons
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Due to anti-bunching, a reduction in the noise properties of the output ports was observed; thus, an indirect verification of two-electron antibunching was achieved.”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > E. Electrons
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [196] Broome, 2013, Photonic boson sampling in a tunable circuit, Science source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Fermions obey Fermi statistics, which leads to anti-bunching at a beam splitter.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The Hong-Ou-Mandel effect is colloquially referred to as a test for the distinguishability between two photons: if we witness a coincidence, the two photons had different states.”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > B. The SWAP test
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Overall, we see that the CZ gate heavily relies on the HOM effect, the output depending on whether the control and target photons bunched or not.”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > A. Linear quantum computing
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the experiment opens the path to phonon quantum information experiments, such as boson sampling or entanglement generation in larger ion crystals, relying on a phononic HOM interference.”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > B. Phonons
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“Although the observed dip had only a visibility of 0.43±0.02(see Fig. 8b) and thus below the classical limit of 0.5”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > A. Plasmons
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [180] Lahini, 2012, Quantum walk of two interacting bosons, Phys. Rev. A source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedSingle caseTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“By making the photons pairwise distinguishable, e.g. by delaying independently two photons, one can map a probability surface with non-trivial features (see Fig. 7b).This surface can be seen as the three-dimensional extension to the 2-dimensional HOM interference dip [141].”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > A. Three-photon interferences in a Bell-tritter
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [141] Navez, 2003, Cloning a real d-dimensional quantum state on the edge of the no-signaling condition, Phys. Rev. A source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not checked yet
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Importantly, the complex features of three-partite interference experiments were also discussed in terms of quantum metrology and phase sensing to enhance precision [145].”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > A. Three-photon interferences in a Bell-tritter
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [145] Ricci, 2004, Teleportation scheme implementing the universal optical quantum cloning machine and the universal not gate, Phys. Rev. Lett. source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not checked yet
In the paper
“At the plasmonics beam splitter, anti-coalescence or non-linear absorption can be observed [187].”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > A. Plasmons
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [187] Crespi, 2013, Anderson localization of entangled photons in an integrated quantum walk, Nat. Photon. source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“or can probe the statistics in quantum walks [161].”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > B. Mulitphotons in general multiports
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [161] Garcia-Escartin, 2013, Swap test and Hong–Ou–Mandel effect are equivalent, Phys. Rev. A source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not checked yet
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For two maximally distinguishable (orthogonal) states, the overlap is 0 and P = 1/2, while for maximally indistinguishable states the overlap is 1 and the probability to pass the test is also 1.”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > B. The SWAP test
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Since two plasmon HOM interference is now well-established, it can be considered one of the building blocks of future quantum plasmonic circuits”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > A. Plasmons
Load-bearingStrength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“This so-called triad phase is the sum of the three relative phases between pairwise inputs (see Fig. 7c) and only effects the outcome if the photons are partially distinguishable.”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > A. Three-photon interferences in a Bell-tritter
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [144] De Martini, 2002, Experimental realization of the quantum universal not gate, Nature source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In higher dimensions, one needs the equivalent circuit for projecting onto the symmetric/antisymmetric subspaces.”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > B. The SWAP test
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Similarly, the SWAP test is a quantum computing primitive operation that tests for the inequality between two quantum states.”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > B. The SWAP test
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Bell-ports have been discussed theoretically since many years in connection to multipartite and high-dimensional quantum information [137,139,140].”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > A. Three-photon interferences in a Bell-tritter
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [137] Jamiolkowski, 1972, Linear transformations which preserve trace and positive semidefiniteness of operators, Rep. Math. Phys. source
- Not checked yetcites [139] Zhao, 2014, Entangling different-color photons via time-resolved measurement and active feed forward, Phys. Rev. Lett. source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- Not checked yetcites [140] Peres, 2003, How the no-cloning theorem got its name, Fortschr. Phys. source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In terms of the measurement outcome, if |'1' is measured, we can confirm that the two input states are different; however, if the outcome is the state |'0' , they may or may not be equal.”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > B. The SWAP test
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Variations of the NS gate have been reported: one proposal shows the possibility to implement it using only two BS but with slightly lower success probability of (3 -√ 2)/7 [123]; other schemes with again two ancillary photons with success probabilities 1/5 [124] and 1/4 [125].”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > A. Linear quantum computing
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [123] Liu, 2013, Experimental measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution, Phys. Rev. Lett. source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- Not checked yetcites [124] Tang, 2014, Experimental demonstration of polarization encoding measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution, Phys. Rev. Lett. source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- Not checked yetcites [125] Tang, 2014, Measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution over 200 km, Phys. Rev. Lett. source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not checked yet
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“In addition, it is also suggested that this challenges a fundamental principle of computer science, namely the extended Church-Turing thesis.”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > B. Mulitphotons in general multiports
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [166] Żukowski, 1997, Realizable higher-dimensional two-particle entanglements via multiport beam splitters, Phys. Rev. A source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [167] Campos, 2000, Three-photon Hong–Ou–Mandel interference at a multiport mixer, Phys. Rev. A source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“if more than two photons are interfered, a probability surface or coincidence landscape can be investigated [162]”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > B. Mulitphotons in general multiports
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [162] Zeilinger, 1993, Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen correlations in higher dimensions
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“and as such it is considered to be a promising candidate to show quantum supremacy.”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > B. Mulitphotons in general multiports
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [166] Żukowski, 1997, Realizable higher-dimensional two-particle entanglements via multiport beam splitters, Phys. Rev. A source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [167] Campos, 2000, Three-photon Hong–Ou–Mandel interference at a multiport mixer, Phys. Rev. A source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“When two particles for example are sent into a multiport, e.g.multimode waveguide [153,154], multimode fiber [155] or integrated waveguide structures [156], the transmission can be described as a complex bi-partite quantum walk”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > B. Mulitphotons in general multiports
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [153] Okamoto, 2011, Realization of a Knill–Laflamme–Milburn controlled-not photonic quantum circuit combining effective optical nonlinearities, Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. source
- Not checked yetcites [154] Harrow, 2009, Quantum algorithm for linear systems of equations, Phys. Rev. Lett. source
- Not checked yetcites [155] Cai, 2013, Experimental quantum computing to solve systems of linear equations, Phys. Rev. Lett. source
- Not checked yetcites [156] Fisher, 2014, Quantum computing on encrypted data, Nat. Commun. source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The eigenstates of the SWAP operator are the Bell states: three Bell states correspond to the eigenvalue +1 (the symmetric subspace), and one corresponds to the eigenvalue -1 (the singlet state, i.e. the antisymmetric subspace).”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > B. The SWAP test
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“It leads to a change in the detection probabilities when all three photons are detected in separate output ports and does not affect the bi-photon transmission probabilities.”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > A. Three-photon interferences in a Bell-tritter
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [144] De Martini, 2002, Experimental realization of the quantum universal not gate, Nature source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In quantum computation, the interaction between two photons is often required to create the building blocks of certain quantum gates, for example CNOT and CZ gates.”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > IX. CONCLUSION
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“two-photon interference enables the measurement of maximally entangled states through Bell states measurements, or equivalently, the projection onto the Bell basis.”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > IX. CONCLUSION
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Two-photon interference is fundamentally interesting because it has no classical counterpart”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > IX. CONCLUSION
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In quantum communication, it can be used to circumvent the problem of untrusted measurement devices, and build novel protocols.”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > IX. CONCLUSION
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In quantum state analysis, it gives the possibility to distinguish between modes, since only indistinguishable states will bunch.”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > IX. CONCLUSION
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“with many applications ranging from precision measurement and state determination to quantum computations and quantum communication.”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > IX. CONCLUSION
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In metrology, two photon interference allows for femtosecond and even attosecond time-resolution, state determination (quantum state analysis), and generating non-classical light for resolution enhancement with linear optics.”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > IX. CONCLUSION
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Two-photon interference acts as the linear optical solution to this challenge, and thus provides a scalable technique to build photonic quantum computers.”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > IX. CONCLUSION
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Two particle interferences is not only the basis for most of optical quantum information science and a powerful tool for metrology and other fields”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > IX. CONCLUSION
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Bell state measurements are central to the concepts of teleportation and entanglement swapping.”
§ Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect > IX. CONCLUSION
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
Fermions obey Fermi statistics, which leads to anti-bunching at a beam splitter.
“The major difference between indistinguishable bosons and fermions is that the latter obey Fermi statistics, which leads to anti-bunching at a beam splitter.”
The paper relies on this without support.
SPPs, being bosonic quasiparticles, are expected to bunch in a HOM-type experiment.
“Because SPPs are described as quasiparticles with a bosonic nature, they were also expected to bunch in a HOM-type experiment.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Phonons follow Bose-Einstein statistics and are expected to bunch in a HOM-like arrangement.
“Phonons also follow Bose-Einstein statistics, and as such they are expected to bunch in a HOM-like arrangement.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Even massive particles should be able to exhibit two-particle interferences following quantum mechanics.
“following quantum mechanics, even massive particles should be able to exhibit two-particle interferences.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
The state-joining expansion swaps its two cross terms
MinorExpanding the tensor product gives αδ for a horizontally polarized photon in mode I and a vertically polarized photon in mode II, and βγ for the reverse. The displayed expansion assigns those coefficients the other way around.
“|φ I ⊗ |ψ II = (α |1 I,H + β |1 I,V ) ⊗ (γ |1 II,H + δ |1 II,V )”
“= αγ |1 H , 1 H + βγ |1 H , 1 V +αδ |1 V , 1 H + βδ |1 V , 1 V ,”
The two-photon N00N state is attributed to the wrong equation
MinorThe paper says the N = 2 N00N state is the state in Eq. (5), but Eq. (5) defines polarization Bell states with one photon in each input path. The two-photon path N00N state produced by the beam splitter is instead displayed in Eq. (4).
“For the case of N = 2 [36,37], we recognize the state from Eq. ( 5) where two indistinguishable photons are made incident onto both input ports of a 50:50 BS, resulting in HOM interference.”
“|Ψ ± ab = 1 √ 2 (|H a |V b ± |V a |H b ) (5”
Citations
Cites
Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?
Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., & Rosen, N. (1935) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.47.777 · Cited by 16,654
Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen channels
Bennett, C. H., Brassard, G., Crépeau, C., Jozsa, R., Peres, A., & Wootters, W. K. (1993) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.70.1895 · Cited by 13,703 · cited 1×
“Beyond quantum cryptography, many quantum communication schemes—such as entanglement swapping [106], quantum teleportation [107], and dense-coding [108]—are also based on the concept of entanglement.”
BackgroundOn the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox
Bell, J. S. (1964) · Physics Physique Fizika · doi:10.1103/physicsphysiquefizika.1.195 · Cited by 12,252
Quantum cryptography based on Bell’s theorem
Ekert, A. K. (1991) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.67.661 · Cited by 10,777
Gisin, N., Ribordy, G., Tittel, W., & Zbinden, H. (2002) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.74.145 · Cited by 8,515
A scheme for efficient quantum computation with linear optics
Knill, E., Laflamme, R., & Milburn, G. J. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35051009 · Cited by 5,880
Communication via one- and two-particle operators on Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen states
Bennett, C. H., & Wiesner, S. J. (1992) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.69.2881 · Cited by 5,470
A single quantum cannot be cloned
Wootters, W. K., & Zurek, W. H. (1982) · Nature · doi:10.1038/299802a0 · Cited by 5,406 · cited 2×
“Considering the well-known fact that quantum mechanics does not allow the possibility to clone an unknown state [104, 140], the ability to perform quantum cloning may seem counterintuitive.”
BackgroundMeasurement of subpicosecond time intervals between two photons by interference
Hong, C. K., Ou, Z. Y., & Mandel, L. (1987) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.59.2044 · Cited by 4,369
Giovannetti, V., Lloyd, S., & Maccone, L. (2011) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2011.35 · Cited by 3,894
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 232
Barzel, R., & Lämmerzahl, C. (2023) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.107.032205 · Cited by 5
Conflict-Free Joint Sampling for Preference Satisfaction through Quantum Interference
Shinkawa, H., Chauvet, N., Röhm, A., Mihana, T., Horisaki, R., Bachelier, G., & Naruse, M. (2022) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.18.064018 · Cited by 5
Coherence Interpretation of the Hong-Ou-Mandel EffectPreprint
Byoung Seung, H. A. M. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4427349 · Cited by 5
Examination of the extended Hong-Ou-Mandel effect and considerations for experimental detection
Alsing, P. M., & Birrittella, R. J. (2025) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.111.032616 · Cited by 4
Quantum-optical scattering by macroscopic lossy objects: A general approach
Ciattoni, A. (2025) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/9mpv-thdp · Cited by 4
Imaging of Biphoton States: Fundamentals and Applications
D’Errico, A., & Karimi, E. (2026) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.202526562 · Cited by 4
Self-citationEntanglement and coherence dynamics in photonic quantum memristors
Ferrara, A., & Franco, R. L. (2025) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.111.012421 · Cited by 4
Tutorial: Hong–Ou–Mandel interference with structured photons
Jaouni, T., Gu, X., Krenn, M., D’Errico, A., & Karimi, E. (2025) · Nanophotonics · doi:10.1515/nanoph-2025-0034 · Cited by 4
Self-citationQuantum beat of two single photons in the transverse momentum space
Guo, B., Chen, Z., Maggio, L., Wu, W., Liu, S., Tamma, V., & Fan, J. (2025) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/wv2d-5z4g · Cited by 4
Becerra, G. J. R., Gómez, J. S. S. D., Ramírez, P. M. C. T., Ramírez-Alarcón, R., Gómez-Robles, M., & Salas‐Montiel, R. (2024) · Applied Optics · doi:10.1364/ao.532359 · Cited by 4
Engineering of Hong-Ou-Mandel interference with effective noise
Siltanen, O., Kuusela, T., & Piilo, J. (2021) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.104.042201 · Cited by 4
Photon Phase Delay Sensing with Sub-Attosecond Uncertainty
Sgobba, F., Andrisani, A., & Amato, L. S. (2024) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s24072202 · Cited by 4
Full characterization of biphotons with a generalized quantum interferometer
Li, B., Chen, C., Yuan, B., Zhang, X.-F., Dong, R., Zhang, S., & Jin, R. (2024) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.109.043703 · Cited by 4
Fast measurement of group index variation with optimum precision using Hong–Ou–Mandel interferometry
Singh, S., Kumar, V., & Samanta, G. K. (2024) · APL Quantum · doi:10.1063/5.0220993 · Cited by 3
Non-classicality and the effect of one photon
Gerry, C. C., Birrittella, R. J., Alsing, P. M., Mimih, J., & Knight, P. L. (2024) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2023.0331 · Cited by 3
Quantum simulation in hybrid transmission lines
Ferreri, A., & Wilhelm, F. K. (2025) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.23.024026 · Cited by 3
Non-local quantum interference of deterministically separated photons
Bajar, K., Bhat, V. S., Chatterjee, R., Qureshi, T., & Mujumdar, S. A. (2025) · Results in Optics · doi:10.1016/j.rio.2025.100848 · Cited by 3
Thomas, J. M., Cameron, A., Pathiranage, A., Xie, S., Valivarthi, R., Spentzouris, P., Spiropulu, M., Peña, C., & Kumar, P. (2026) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/qd6n-548v · Cited by 3
Classically tuning the quantum interference of two photons scattered by a macroscopic lossy sphere
Ciattoni, A. (2026) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/m5xh-q1rx · Cited by 3
Performance and application analysis of quantum memory
Wang, Y., Zhou, Y., Wang, Y., Yan, H., & Zhu, S.-L. (2023) · Acta Physica Sinica · doi:10.7498/aps.72.20231203 · Cited by 4
Broadband integrated directional coupler for heralded single-photon characterization
Castro-Simanca, F., Domínguez-Serna, F. A., Gómez-Robles, M., Salas‐Montiel, R., de la Cruz, W., & Garay-Palmett, K. (2025) · Journal of the Optical Society of America B · doi:10.1364/josab.572117 · Cited by 3
Kaulfuss, P. L., Alsing, P. M., Smith, A. M., Monteleone, J. A., & Hach, E. E. (2023) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.5.023097 · Cited by 3
Backscattering and Hong-Ou-Mandel manifolds in microring resonators
Kaulfuss, P. L., Alsing, P. M., Birrittella, R. J., & Vitullo, D. L. P. (2023) · Photonics for Quantum (PfQ) · doi:10.1117/12.2672115 · Cited by 3
Oba, J., Kajita, S., & Soeda, A. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-53246-2 · Cited by 3
Zhifeng, 刘. L., Shuangyin, 黄. H., Chao, 陈. C., Zhicheng, 任. R., Xilin, 汪. W., & Huitian, 王. W. (2024) · Acta Optica Sinica · doi:10.3788/aos231992 · Cited by 3
Suryadi, S., Amadi, P. O., & Ali, N. (2025) · Physics · doi:10.3390/physics7020014 · Cited by 2
Linear-optical four-dimensional Bell state measurement with the two-photon interference
Zeng, Z. (2025) · Journal of the Optical Society of America B · doi:10.1364/josab.568256 · Cited by 2
A generalized formulation of two-particle interference
Nazir, K., & Qureshi, T. (2025) · The European Physical Journal D · doi:10.1140/epjd/s10053-025-01043-5 · Cited by 2
Li, Y., Liu, H., Lu, D., & Ren, C. (2025) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/yzg1-3dfk · Cited by 2
Biphoton state generation and engineering with bright hybrid III–V/silicon photonic devices
Lazzari, L., Schuhmann, J., Meskine, O., Morassi, M., Lemaître, A., Amanti, M. I., Bœuf, F., Raineri, F., Baboux, F., & Ducci, S. (2026) · Optica Quantum · doi:10.1364/opticaq.584830 · Cited by 2
Quantum-light probe for molecular femtosecond dephasing in dyes
Rajib, T. I., Dharmasiri, A., Pochechuev, M. S., Liu, X., Agarwal, G. S., & Zheltikov, A. M. (2026) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/2zpv-g7w2 · Cited by 2
Quantum Clock Synchronization Networks: A Survey
Khalid, U., Ulum, M. S., Mujirin, de Abreu, G. T. F., Björnson, E., & Shin, H. (2026) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2026.3694353 · Cited by 2
Experimental Quantum Voting Using Photonic Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger States
Marcellino, F., Wu, M., & Thew, R. (2026) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/jlvb-t2xl · Cited by 2
Hong–Ou–Mandel interference of longitudinal spatially coherent beams
Arya, G., Sharma, P., & Kanseri, B. (2022) · Journal of the Optical Society of America A · doi:10.1364/josaa.478412 · Cited by 2
Unfolding the Hong–Ou–Mandel interference between heralded photons from narrowband twin beams
Laiho, K., Dirmeier, T., Shafiee, G., & Marquardt, C. (2023) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/ace791 · Cited by 2
Hong–Ou–Mandel interference of more than ten indistinguishable atoms
Quensen, M., Hetzel, M., Santos, L., Smerzi, A., Tóth, G., Pezzè, L., & Klempt, C. (2026) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/s41567-026-03302-7 · Cited by 2
Tailoring indistinguishability of photons using longitudinal spatial coherence
Sharma, P., Arya, G., & Kanseri, B. (2025) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/tbpt-jbmw · Cited by 2
Li, Y. F., Wang, M., Zeng, C., Liu, H., Ni, H., Niu, Z., & Hu, C. (2025) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/qsyr-ddw4 · Cited by 2
Quantum imaging of the fast-axis angle using Hong–Ou–Mandel interference
Gonçalves, C., Ferreira, T. D., Monteiro, C. S., & Silva, N. A. (2026) · APL Photonics · doi:10.1063/5.0326576 · Cited by 2
Atom-Mechanical Hong-Ou-Mandel Interference
Manukhova, A. D., Rakhubovsky, A. A., & Filip, R. (2022) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2022-04-13-686 · Cited by 2
Ontological indistinguishability as a central tenet of quantum theory
de Barros, J. A., & Holik, F. (2023) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2022.0100 · Cited by 2
Spectral Characterization of Two-Photon Interference between Independent Sources
Duan, L., Xu, A., & Zhang, Y. (2023) · Photonics · doi:10.3390/photonics10101125 · Cited by 2
Self-citationQuantum Theory of Optical Coherence
Walls, D. F., & Milburn, G. J. (2025) · Graduate texts in physics · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-84177-4_2 · Cited by 2
A Wave Nature-Based Interpretation of The Nonclassical Feature of Photon Bunching On A Beam SplitterPreprint
Byoung Seung, H. A. M. (2021) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1062358/v1 · Cited by 2
Coherence interpretations of nonlocal quantum correlation based on a quantum eraserPreprint
Byoung Seung, H. A. M. (2022) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1782098/v1 · Cited by 2
Charge Dynamics of InAs Quantum Dots Under Resonant and Above-Band Excitation
Lander, G. R. (2022) · The Research Repository @ WVU (West Virginia University) · doi:10.33915/etd.11390 · Cited by 2
Fabre, N., Amanti, M. I., Baboux, F., Keller, A., Ducci, S., & Milman, P. (2022) · The European Physical Journal D · doi:10.1140/epjd/s10053-022-00576-3 · Cited by 2
LaPierre, R. (2022) · Undergraduate texts in physics · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-12432-7_17 · Cited by 1
Frequency-domain Hong-Ou-Mandel interference in cold atoms with induced atomic coherence
Malakyan, Y. P. (2023) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.107.053715 · Cited by 1
IMPLEMENTING THREE-QUBIT GROVER’S ALGORITHM USING REAL QUANTUM PLATFORMS
Simonetti, M., Perri, D., & Gervasi, O. (2025) · Fractals · doi:10.1142/s0218348x25401991 · Cited by 1
Nonlinear-linear duality for multipath quantum interference
Zheng, Y., Xu, J., Li, C., & Guo, G.-C. (2025) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/6zhj-5t26 · Cited by 1
Tunneling of bosonic qubits under local dephasing through a microscopic approach
Ferrara, A., Nosrati, F., Smirne, A., Piilo, J., & Franco, R. L. (2026) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/f2sy-sj27 · Cited by 1
Wenfeng, 黄. H., Jie, 赵. Z., Zeliang, 武. W., Chunhua, 袁. Y., & Liqing, 陈. C. (2025) · Acta Optica Sinica · doi:10.3788/aos251404 · Cited by 1
Photonic networking of quantum memories in high dimensions
Shalaev, M. I., Saha, S., Toh, G., Goetting, I., Kalakuntla, A., Shi, H. B., O'Reilly, J. P., Yu, Y., & Monroe, C. R. (2026) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aed8404 · Cited by 1
Roque, J. A., Peace, D., White, S., Polino, E., Das, S., Ghafari, F., Slussarenko, S., Tischler, N., & Romero, J. (2026) · APL Photonics · doi:10.1063/5.0299808 · Cited by 1
Zanin, M., Du, Z., Giorgi, G. L., Sun, X., & Wandelt, S. (2026) · Technologies · doi:10.3390/technologies14020103 · Cited by 1
Tailoring Spatial Correlations With Quantum Interference
Schiano, C., Sephton, B., Darsheshdar, E., Marrucci, L., de Lisio, C., & D’Ambrosio, V. (2026) · Laser & Photonics Review · doi:10.1002/lpor.202502895 · Cited by 1
Alsing, P. M., Birrittella, R. J., & Kaulfuss, P. L. (2026) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/bnzx-znhf · Cited by 1
Molecular-environment-sensitive ultrafast dephasing via Hong-Ou-Mandel interferometry
Rajib, T. I., Pochechuev, M. S., Dharmasiri, A., Hatcher, K., Liu, X., Zheltikov, A. M., & Agarwal, G. S. (2026) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/b3zr-c93k · Cited by 1
Complex structure and efficient characterization of multiphoton split states in integrated circuits
Zhang, J., & Sukhorukov, A. A. (2023) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.107.062615 · Cited by 1
Dispersion-managed Hong-Ou-Mandel revival via a biphoton frequency comb
Cheng, X., Chang, K.-C., Sarihan, M. C., & Wong, C. W. (2023) · Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics · doi:10.1364/cleo_fs.2023.ftu3a.4 · Cited by 1
Panyukov, I. V., Shishkov, V. Y., & Andrianov, E. S. (2023) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.108.023711 · Cited by 1
Accessing the spectrum of a single-photon by the Hong-Ou-Mandel interference
Duan, L., Xu, A., Wang, L., & Zhang, Y. (2024) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.510983 · Cited by 1
Self-citationMultiparameter cascaded quantum interferometer
Li, B., Li, Q.-Q., Wang, Z., Wang, P., Chen, C., Yuan, B., Zhai, Y., & Zhang, X. (2024) · Optics & Laser Technology · doi:10.1016/j.optlastec.2024.111558 · Cited by 1
Demonstrating two-particle interference with a one-dimensional delta potential well
Deng, Z. J., Zhang, X., Shen, Y., Liu, W.-T., & Chen, P.-X. (2024) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/5.0176364 · Cited by 1
Comprehensive interference characteristics of a three-parameter Hong–Ou–Mandel interferometer
Li, B., Wang, Z., Li, Q.-Q., Wang, P.-L., Chen, C., Yuan, B., & Zhang, X. (2024) · Journal of the Optical Society of America B · doi:10.1364/josab.539402 · Cited by 1
High probability scheme for Zero photon subtraction with Mach–Zehnder interferometer
Idrees, M., & Zhang, S. (2025) · Optics Communications · doi:10.1016/j.optcom.2025.131917 · Cited by 1
Multiphoton interference in a single-spatial-mode quantum walk
Fenwick, K. L., Baker, J., Thekkadath, G., Goldberg, A. Z., Heshami, K., Bustard, P. J., England, D. G., Bouchard, F., & Sussman, B. (2025) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.550931 · Cited by 1
Self-citationSpatial symmetry in few-photon interference and quantum metrologyPreprint
Descamps, É., & Milman, P. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.12786 · Cited by 1
Tera-mode of Spatiotemporal N00N StatesPreprint
Gao, X., Zhang, Y., D’Errico, A., Heshami, K., & Karimi, E. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University)
Self-citationThe origin of indistinguishability of quantum features in an interferometric systemPreprint
Byoung Seung, H. A. M. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.14244
Two-photon scattering effect of a single Mie scatterer
Hong, P. (2021) · Journal of the Optical Society of America B · doi:10.1364/josab.445165
Fabre, N., Amanti, M. I., Baboux, F., Keller, A., Ducci, S., & Milman, P. (2022) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2206.01518
Hong-Ou-Mandel interference from distinct molecules on the same chip
Colautti, M., Bacco, D., Duquennoy, R., Emadi, R., Majumder, P., Lombardi, P., Murtaza, G., Hilke, M., Cataliotti, F. S., Zavatta, A., et al. (2023) · Quantum Computing, Communication, and Simulation · doi:10.1117/12.2649945
Two-photon Interference at a Single Input Port of a Beam-Splitter
Palacios-Avila, P., Pennacchietti, M. P., Cunard, B., Dalacu, D., Poole, P. J., Sajeed, S., Kuntz, K. B., Reimer, M. E., & Jennewein, T. D. (2023) · Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics · doi:10.1364/cleo_fs.2023.fm3e.7
On the comparison of two integrated photon-pair sources through on-chip Hong-Ou-Mandel interference
Sanna, M., Lee, J.-M., Baldazzi, A., Azzini, S., Ahn, J. T., Lee, M., Sohn, Y.-I., & Pavesi, L. (2023) · Quantum 2.0 Conference and Exhibition · doi:10.1364/quantum.2023.qw2a.20
Optical Test of Quantum Mechanics
Gerry, C. C., & Knight, P. L. (2023) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781139151207.010
Hong-Ou-Mandel Comb and Switch using parallel chains of non-identical Micro-Ring ResonatorsPreprint
Kaulfuss, P. L., Alsing, P. M., Birrittella, R. J., Smith, A. M., Schneeloch, J., & Hach, E. E. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2401.14491
Two Photon Interference for the Measurement of Heavy Metal Ions in Drinking Water: A Novel ApproachPreprint
Yadav, M., & Sahu, P. P. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4834733
Quantum interferometry via temporal quantum erasing
Sgobba, F., Andrisani, A., Pallotti, D. K., & Amato, L. S. (2024) · International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks · doi:10.1109/icton62926.2024.10647712
Fourier analysis of many-body transition amplitudes and states
Dufour, G., & Buchleitner, A. (2026) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/ae98a9 · Cited by 2
Hong‐Ou‐Mandel Interference on a Lattice: Symmetries and Interactions
Mforifoum, M. K. N., Buchleitner, A., & Dufour, G. (2024) · Annalen der Physik · doi:10.1002/andp.202400132
Hong-Ou-Mandel DIP Measurement of two Independent Weak Coherent Pulses
Kumar, V., Halder, P., Arka, M., Luv, G., Vaishnavi, A. V. S., Lal, S. R., Kumar, R. P., Kumar, G. A., Priya, M., Kumar, D. P., et al. (2024) · ITU Kaleidoscope Academic Conference (ITU K) · doi:10.23919/ituk62727.2024.10772878
On the Interference of Coherent Photon States and Number Photon States
Suryadi, S. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Communication, Networks and Satellite (COMNETSAT) · doi:10.1109/comnetsat63286.2024.10861939
Laser beam characterization for experiments in quantum optics
Yadav, K., Ali, S. A., Sirohi, S., Nautiyal, A., Viswanathan, B., Prabhakar, A., & Bisht, P. B. (2025) · Journal of Micromanufacturing · doi:10.1177/25165984251314255
Simon, D. S. (2025) · Undergraduate texts in physics · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-81315-3_10
Hong–Ou–Mandel Interference on an Acousto-Optical Beam Splitter
Kwiek, P. (2025) · Optics · doi:10.3390/opt6020025
Quantisation of the Electromagnetic Field
Walls, D. F., & Milburn, G. J. (2025) · Graduate texts in physics · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-84177-4_1
Photon-added coherent states and their quantum entanglement at a beam splitter
Makarov, D. N. (2025) · Chinese Journal of Physics · doi:10.1016/j.cjph.2025.06.012
Pan, C., Song, X.-B., Cao, Y., Xiong, L. S., Lan, X., Wang, S., Leng, Y., & Pan, Y. (2025) · Laser & Photonics Review · doi:10.1002/lpor.202401986
Quantum Entanglement of Photon-Added Coherent States on a Beam Splitter
Makarov, D. N. (2025) · Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics Letters · doi:10.1134/s0021364025605986
Semi-Device Independent Methods to Characterize Multiphoton Indistinguishability
Rodari, G., Novo, L., Albiero, R., Suprano, A., Tavares, C., Caruccio, E., Hoch, F., Giordani, T., Carvacho, G., Gardina, M., et al. (2025) · Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics · doi:10.1364/cleo_fs.2025.ff120_7
Self-citationHong–Ou–Mandel interferometry with cavity QED-based single-photon sources: a quantum jump analysis
Dudones, A., McCollum, C., & Mirza, I. M. (2025) · Journal of the Optical Society of America B · doi:10.1364/josab.572714
Modeling and benchmarking quantum optical neurons for efficient neural computation
Andrisani, A., Vessio, G., Sgobba, F., Lena, F. D., Amato, L. S., & Castellano, G. (2026) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0341545
Cheng, Z.-M., Dong, B.-W., Wan, P., Zhu, W.-Z., Ren, Z.-C., Wang, X.-L., & Wang, H.-T. (2025) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/8b89-22tm
Photon pairs for fundamental tests of physics and applications in quantum networks
Müller, C. (2024) · edoc Publication server (Humboldt University of Berlin) · doi:10.18452/28208
Two-Photon Nonclassical Interference Between Two Different Sources
Duan, L., Liu, J., & Liu, C. (2026) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-10400-7_50
Harnessing Quantum Optical States for Sensing and Imaging Applications
Gonçalves, C. R. (2025) · Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT)
Multiphoton Hong–Ou–Mandel interference enables superresolution of bright thermal sources
Khan, A., Triggiani, D., & Tamma, V. (2026) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/ae9abd
Metadata
- Authors
- Bouchard, F., Sit, A., Zhang, Y., Fickler, R., Miatto, F. M., Yao, Y., Sciarrino, F., & Karimi, E.
- Affiliations
- University of Ottawa (CA)
- National Research Council Canada (CA)
- Télécom Paris (FR)
- Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Karimi, Ebrahim
- ORCID
- Venue
- Reports on Progress in Physics
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2020-12-24
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 012402
- ISSN
- 0034-4885 (ISSN-L)
- 1361-6633
- OpenAlex
- W3034980548
- Semantic Scholar
- 93d14a8357b5c60331f7ab0d5939307953fa1e08
- Cited by
- 232
- References
- 257
- Citations by year
- 2026: 48 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 12
- FWCI
- 9.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Reports on Progress in Physics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- NPARC (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Ontario Early Researcher Award
- Canada Research Chairs
- Canada First Research Excellence Fund
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum optics and atomic interactions
- Keywords
- two-photon interference, Hong-Ou-Mandel interference, two-particle interference, quantum optics, massive particles, electrons, atoms, plasmons, quantum computing, quantum communication, quantum simulation, precision measurement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review