The DOI matches its Crossref record; 96 of the 96 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“As the relationship between the servant leader and the follower matures overtime Table 10 Suggestions for servant leadership behavior in experimental designs.(Graen & Uhl-Bien, 1995), we would expect to see the servant leader focus less on the professional elements of the relationship (i.e.assisting with task-related behavior) and focus more on the personal capacity building elements of the”
From Servant Leadership: A systematic review and call for future research (2019) · cites this paper as Graen & Uhl-Bien, 1995
In the citing paper
“First, LMX focuses on followers' perceptions of the degree to which they have a positive relationship with their leader (Graen & Uhl-Bien, 1995).”
From A meta-analysis of the role of trust in the leadership- performance relationship (2021) · cites this paper as Graen & Uhl-Bien, 1995
In the citing paper
“In contrast, LMX is argued to be built specifically on the history of exchanges between a leader and follower (e.g., Graen & Uhl-Bien, 1995).”
From A meta-analysis of the role of trust in the leadership- performance relationship (2021) · cites this paper as Graen & Uhl-Bien, 1995
In the citing paper
“More particularly, LMX theory emphasizes how leaders work with their followers on a one-to-one basis to develop high-quality relationships with each of them (Graen and Uhl-Bien 1995).”
From The Servant Leadership Survey: Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Measure (2011) · cites this paper as Graen and Uhl-Bien 1995
In the citing paper
“Liden and Maslyn ' s (1998) leader-member exchange multidimensional measure (LMXMDM) and Graen and Uhl-Bien ' s (1995) LMX-7 capture reciprocity indirectly by asking what each party of the dyad brings to the relationship, without specifically asking respondents if the reciprocity motivated a dyadic member ' s contribution to the relationship.”
From The evolution of leadership: Past insights, present trends, and future directions (2025) · cites this paper as Graen and Uhl-Bien (1995)
Citations
Cites
Longshore, J. M., & Bass, B. M. (1987) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258081 · Cited by 12,424
The Social Psychology of Organizations.
Hackman, J. R., Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1979) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2989929 · Cited by 12,243
Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology.
Hammer, T. H., Anderson, J. F., Gurdon, M. A., Jick, T. D., Petit, A., Stern, R. N., Schwartz, H., Vardi, Y., & Dunnette, M. D. (1977) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2391755 · Cited by 11,947
(1969) · Virtual Defense Library (Ministerio de Defensa) · Cited by 10,735
Kilzer, E., & Skinner, B. F. (1953) · The American Catholic Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/3707860 · Cited by 8,940
YUKL, G. A. (1981) · Cited by 5,266
Symonds, P. M. (1954) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0051901 · Cited by 4,902
LISREL 7 : a guide to the program and applications
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1989) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,787
A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations
Dansereau, F., Graen, G., & Haga, W. J. (1975) · Organizational Behavior and Human Performance · doi:10.1016/0030-5073(75)90005-7 · Cited by 2,890
Self-citationHandbook of Organizational Behavior
Price, R., D’Aunno, T. A., & Lorsch, J. W. (1988) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2070561 · Cited by 2,241
Research works printed but not linked: 17
- Ashkanasy, 1994, Value differences as a barrier in leader-member exchange: A multidimensional scaling analysis, Paper presented at the Academy of Management annual meeting
- Bauer, 1994, Leader-member exchange: Relationships with performance expectations and leader delegation at two points in time, Paper presented at the Academy of Management Meetings
- Butler, 1991, Leadership style and sales performance: A test of the situational leadership model, Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 11, 37
- Dienesch, 1985, A three dimensional model of leader-member exchange: An empirical test, Paper presented at the Academy of Management annual meeting
- Dunegan, 1992, Task-level climate and LMX as interactive predictors of performance, Paper presented at the Academy of Management annual meeting
- Forret, 1994, The leader-member exchange model: A review and directions for future research, Paper presented at the Academy of Management annual meeting
- Graen, 1991, Partnership-making applies equally well to teammate-sponsor teammate-competence network, and teammate-teammate relationships, Journal of Management Systems, 3, 49
- Graen, 1994, Cross-cultural leadership-making: Bridging American and Japanese diversity for team advantage, Vol. 4, 415
- Liden, 1993, Scale development of a MDM measure of LMX, Paper presented at the Academy of Management annual meeting
- Liden, 1994, A field investigation of individual empowerment, group empowerment, and task interdependence, Paper presented at the National Academy of Management Meeting
- Manogran, 1993, A leader-member exchange approach to explaining organizational citizenship behavior, Proceedings of the annual meeting of the academy of management, 249
- Phillips, 1993, An examination of the multidimensionality of leader-member exchange, Paper presented at the Southern Management Association Meetings
- Ridolphi, 1984, Leader behavior versus leader-member exchange: A competitive test, Paper presented at the Southeast Decision Sciences meeting
- Rousseau, 1985, Issues of level in organizational research: Multilevel and cross-level perspectives, vol. 7, 1
- Schriesheim, 1992, An exploration of the discriminant validity of the leader-member exchange scale (LMX 7) commonly used in organizational research, Paper presented at the Southern Management Association Meeting
- Tsui, 1994, Performance implications of relational demography in vertical dyads, Paper presented at the Academy of Management annual meeting
- Uhl-Bien, 1993, Toward a contingency model of empowerment: Contribution of self-management empowerment and leadership-making empowerment to uni-functional and multi-fu, Paper presented at the National Academy of Management Meeting
Cited by
Sorted by citations
An integrative model of organizational trust
Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258792 · Cited by 10,736
Social Exchange Theory: An Interdisciplinary Review
Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206305279602 · Cited by 10,068
Hobfoll, S. E., Halbesleben, J., Neveu, J.-P., & Westman, M. (2018) · Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104640 · Cited by 5,781
Authentic leadership development: Getting to the root of positive forms of leadership
Avolio, B. J., & Gardner, W. L. (2005) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.03.001 · Cited by 5,478
Meta-Analytic review of leader–member exchange theory: Correlates and construct issues.
Gerstner, C. R., & Day, D. V. (1997) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.82.6.827 · Cited by 3,005
Emotions and leadership: The role of emotional intelligence
George, J. M. (2000) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726700538001 · Cited by 2,027
Relational leadership theory: exploring the social processes of leadership and organizing
Uhl-Bien, M. (2006) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.10.007 · Cited by 1,973
Self-citationServant Leadership: A systematic review and call for future research
Eva, N., Robin, M., Sendjaya, S., van Dierendonck, D., & Liden, R. C. (2019) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.07.004 · Cited by 1,858
Dulebohn, J. H., Bommer, W. H., Liden, R. C., Brouer, R. L., & Ferris, G. R. (2012) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206311415280 · Cited by 1,625
Colquitt, J. A., Scott, B. A., Rodell, J. B., Long, D. M., Zapata, C. P., Conlon, D. E., & Wesson, M. J. (2013) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0031757 · Cited by 1,462
NISHII, L. H., LEPAK, D. P., & SCHNEIDER, B. (2008) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.00121.x · Cited by 1,410
EHRHART, M. G. (2004) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2004.tb02484.x · Cited by 1,322
Scale development and construct clarification of servant leadership
Barbuto, J. E., & Wheeler, D. W. (2006) · Group & Organization Management · doi:10.1177/1059601106287091 · Cited by 1,288
Authentic leadership and eudaemonic well-being: Understanding leader–follower outcomes
Ilies, R., Morgeson, F. P., & Nahrgang, J. D. (2005) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.03.002 · Cited by 1,268
How bad are the effects of bad leaders? A meta-analysis of destructive leadership and its outcomes
Schyns, B., & Schilling, J. (2013) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.09.001 · Cited by 1,245
Leader-member exchange and citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis
Ilies, R., Nahrgang, J. D., & Morgeson, F. P. (2007) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.269 · Cited by 1,210
Followership theory: A review and research agenda
Uhl-Bien, M., Riggio, R. E., Lowe, K. B., & Carsten, M. K. (2014) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.11.007 · Cited by 1,213
Self-citationPsychological Safety: A Meta‐Analytic Review and Extension
Frazier, M. L., Fainshmidt, S., Klinger, R. L., Pezeshkan, A., & Vracheva, V. (2017) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/peps.12183 · Cited by 1,231
The toxic triangle: destructive leaders, susceptible followers, and conducive environments.
Padilla, A., Hogan, R., & Kaiser, R. B. (2007) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.03.001 · Cited by 1,188
The Servant Leadership Survey: Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Measure
van Dierendonck, D., & Nuijten, I. (2011) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-010-9194-1 · Cited by 1,096
“More particularly, LMX theory emphasizes how leaders work with their followers on a one-to-one basis to develop high-quality relationships with each of them (Graen and Uhl-Bien 1995).”
BackgroundKark, R., & Van Dijk, D. (2007) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2007.24351846 · Cited by 818
Leader–Member Exchange (LMX) and Performance: A Meta‐Analytic Review
Martin, R., Guillaume, Y., Thomas, G., Lee, A., & Epitropaki, O. (2016) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/peps.12100 · Cited by 809
Owens, B. P., & Hekman, D. R. (2012) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2010.0441 · Cited by 778
Simmering, M. J., Fuller, C. M., Richardson, H. A., Ocal, Y., & Atinc, G. M. (2015) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428114560023 · Cited by 734
Nishii, L. H., & Mayer, D. M. (2009) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0017190 · Cited by 689
Leadership behavior and employee well-being: An integrated review and a future research agenda
Inceoglu, I., Thomas, G., Chu, C., Plans, D., & Gerbasi, A. (2018) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.12.006 · Cited by 670
Leading virtual teams: Hierarchical leadership, structural supports, and shared team leadership.
Hoch, J. E., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2014) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0030264 · Cited by 657
Liden, R. C., Erdogan, B., Wayne, S. J., & Sparrowe, R. T. (2006) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.409 · Cited by 595
Thriving at work: A meta‐analysis
Kleine, A., Rudolph, C. W., & Zacher, H. (2019) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2375 · Cited by 606
Transformational Leadership, Conservation, and Creativity: Evidence From Korea
(2003) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/30040662 · Cited by 589
Rubin, R. S., Munz, D. C., & Bommer, W. H. (2005) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2005.18803926 · Cited by 576
Positive social interactions and the human body at work: Linking organizations and physiology
Heaphy, E. D., & Dutton, J. E. (2008) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2008.27749365 · Cited by 578
E-leadership: Re-examining transformations in leadership source and transmission
Avolio, B. J., Sosik, J. J., Kahai, S. S., & Baker, B. (2014) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.11.003 · Cited by 584
Narcissism and Leadership: A Meta‐Analytic Review of Linear and Nonlinear Relationships
Grijalva, E., Harms, P. D., Newman, D. A., Gaddis, B. H., & Fraley, R. C. (2015) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/peps.12072 · Cited by 572
Leadership and stress: A meta-analytic review
Harms, P. D., Credé, M., Tynan, M., Leon, M., & Jeung, W. (2017) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.10.006 · Cited by 558
Newman, A., Schwarz, G., Cooper, B., & Sendjaya, S. (2017) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2827-6 · Cited by 552
Social support at work: an integrative review
Jolly, P. M., Kong, D. T., & Kim, K. Y. (2021) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2485 · Cited by 513
The Social Network Ties of Group Leaders: Implications for Group Performance and Leader Reputation
Mehra, A., Dixon, A. L., Brass, D. J., & Robertson, B. (2006) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1050.0158 · Cited by 498
Leadership and levels of analysis: A state-of-the-science review
Yammarino, F. J., Dionne, S. D., Uk Chun, J., & Dansereau, F. (2005) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.09.002 · Cited by 501
Leader–member exchange (LMX) and culture: A meta-analysis of correlates of LMX across 23 countries
Rockstuhl, T., Dulebohn, J. H., Ang, S., & Shore, L. M. (2012) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0029978 · Cited by 477
Leadership, affect and emotions: A state of the science review
Gooty, J., Connelly, S., Griffith, J., & Gupta, A. (2010) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.10.005 · Cited by 471
Leadership in applied psychology: Three waves of theory and research
Lord, R. G., Day, D. V., Zaccaro, S. J., Avolio, B. J., & Eagly, A. H. (2017) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000089 · Cited by 461
Yoshida, D. T., Sendjaya, S., Hirst, G., & Cooper, B. (2014) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.08.013 · Cited by 442
LMX differentiation: A multilevel review and examination of its antecedents and outcomes
Henderson, D. J., Liden, R. C., Glibkowski, B. C., & Chaudhry, A. (2009) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.04.003 · Cited by 428
Relationships at Work: Toward a Multidimensional Conceptualization of Dyadic Work Relationships
Ferris, G. R., Liden, R. C., Munyon, T. P., Summers, J. K., Basik, K. J., & Buckley, M. R. (2009) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206309344741 · Cited by 411
Shaffer, J. A., DeGeest, D., & Li, A. (2016) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428115598239 · Cited by 393
Developing Sustainable Leaders Through Coaching and Compassion
Boyatzis, R. E., Smith, M. L., & Blaize, N. (2006) · Academy of Management Learning & Education · doi:10.5465/amle.2006.20388381 · Cited by 389
Chen, Z., Lam, W., & Zhong, J. A. (2007) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.202 · Cited by 380
Botero, I. C., & Van Dyne, L. (2009) · Management Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0893318909335415 · Cited by 359
Butts, M. M., Becker, W. J., & Boswell, W. R. (2015) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2014.0170 · Cited by 353
Authentic Leadership and Employee Voice Behavior: A Multi-Level Psychological Process
Hsiung, H.-H. (2012) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-011-1043-2 · Cited by 347
Empathy and the emergence of task and relations leaders
Kellett, J. B., Humphrey, R. H., & Sleeth, R. G. (2006) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.12.003 · Cited by 337
Den Hartog, D. N. (2015) · Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111237 · Cited by 324
Gajendran, R. S., Harrison, D. A., & Delaney‐Klinger, K. (2015) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/peps.12082 · Cited by 310
Inclusive leadership: how leaders sustain or discourage work group inclusion
Shore, L. M., & Chung, B. G. (2022) · Group & Organization Management · doi:10.1177/1059601121999580 · Cited by 303
Investigating When and Why Psychological Entitlement Predicts Unethical Pro-organizational Behavior
Lee, A., Schwarz, G., Newman, A., & Legood, A. (2019) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-017-3456-z · Cited by 300
Anderson, H. J., Baur, J. E., Griffith, J. A., & Buckley, M. R. (2017) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.08.001 · Cited by 302
The benefits of teleworking in the public sector: reality or rhetoric?
de Vries, H., Tummers, L., & Bekkers, V. (2019) · Review of Public Personnel Administration · doi:10.1177/0734371x18760124 · Cited by 294
Ospina, S., & Foldy, E. (2009) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.09.005 · Cited by 288
Empathy and complex task performance: Two routes to leadership
Kellett, J. B., Humphrey, R. H., & Sleeth, R. G. (2002) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/s1048-9843(02)00142-x · Cited by 287
Johnson, R. E., Lanaj, K., & Barnes, C. M. (2014) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0035647 · Cited by 277
Cogliser, C. C., Schriesheim, C. A., Scandura, T. A., & Gardner, W. L. (2009) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.03.010 · Cited by 257
Leader–member social exchange (LMSX): Development and validation of a scale
Bernerth, J. B., Armenakis, A. A., Feild, H. S., Giles, W. F., & Walker, H. J. (2007) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.443 · Cited by 254
Why and When Leaders’ Affective States Influence Employee Upward Voice
Liu, W., Song, Z., Li, X., & Liao, Z. (2017) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2013.1082 · Cited by 241
Scale indicators of social exchange relationships: A comparison of relative content validity.
Colquitt, J. A., Baer, M. D., Long, D. M., & Halvorsen-Ganepola, M. D. K. (2014) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0036374 · Cited by 238
Vigoda-Gadot, E., & Beeri, I. (2012) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/jopart/mur036 · Cited by 224
Better together? Examining profiles of employee recovery experiences
Bennett, A. A., Gabriel, A. S., Calderwood, C., Dahling, J. J., & Trougakos, J. P. (2016) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000157 · Cited by 219
Walter, F., & Bruch, H. (2008) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.505 · Cited by 218
Leadership across levels: Levels of leaders and their levels of impact
DeChurch, L. A., Hiller, N. J., Murase, T., Doty, D., & Salas, E. (2010) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.10.009 · Cited by 211
Transformational leadership as a mediator between emotional intelligence and team outcomes
Hur, Y., van den Berg, P. T., & Wilderom, C. P. M. (2011) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.05.002 · Cited by 209
Leadership and generations at work: A critical review
Rudolph, C. W., Rauvola, R. S., & Zacher, H. (2018) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.09.004 · Cited by 224
A critique of the Leader-Member Exchange construct: Back to square one
Gottfredson, R. K., Wright, S. L., & Heaphy, E. D. (2020) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2020.101385 · Cited by 205
Careless responding in questionnaire measures: Detection, impact, and remedies
Goldammer, P., Annen, H., Stöckli, P. L., & Jonas, K. (2020) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2020.101384 · Cited by 200
A meta-analysis of the role of trust in the leadership- performance relationship
Legood, A., van der Werff, L., Lee, A., & Den Hartog, D. (2021) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/1359432x.2020.1819241 · Cited by 241
Lapidot, Y., Kark, R., & Shamir, B. (2007) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.11.004 · Cited by 177
The folly of theorizing “A” but testing “B”
Schriesheim, C. A., Castro, S. L., Zhou, X. (., & Yammarino, F. J. (2001) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/s1048-9843(01)00095-9 · Cited by 168
Mor Barak, M. E., Luria, G., & Brimhall, K. C. (2022) · Group & Organization Management · doi:10.1177/10596011211005916 · Cited by 167
The role of coworker and supervisor support on job burnout and job satisfaction
Charoensukmongkol, P., Moqbel, M., & Gutierrez-Wirsching, S. (2016) · Journal of Advances in Management Research · doi:10.1108/jamr-06-2014-0037 · Cited by 161
Trust and Leader—Member Exchange: A Closer Look at Relational Vulnerability
Scandura, T. A., & Pellegrini, E. K. (2008) · Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies · doi:10.1177/1548051808320986 · Cited by 160
Eldor, L. (2018) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/jopart/mux028 · Cited by 159
Young, H. R., Glerum, D. R., Joseph, D. L., & McCord, M. A. (2021) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206320908646 · Cited by 143
A 25-year perspective on levels of analysis in leadership research
Dionne, S. D., Gupta, A., Sotak, K. L., Shirreffs, K. A., Serban, A., Hao, C., Kim, D. H., & Yammarino, F. J. (2014) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.11.002 · Cited by 141
Hogg, M. A. (2010) · Handbook of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/9780470561119.socpsy002031 · Cited by 138
Please accept my sincerest apologies: examining follower reactions to leader apology
Basford, T. E., Offermann, L. R., & Behrend, T. S. (2014) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1613-y · Cited by 133
Improving practice in community-based settings: a randomized trial of supervision – study protocol
Dorsey, S., Pullmann, M. D., Deblinger, E., Berliner, L., Kerns, S. E., Thompson, K., Unützer, J., Weisz, J. R., & Garland, A. F. (2013) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-8-89 · Cited by 113
Linking transformational leadership with employees’ engagement in the creative process
Azim, M. T., Fan, L., Uddin, M. A., Abdul Kader Jilani, M. M., & Begum, S. (2019) · Management Research Review · doi:10.1108/mrr-08-2018-0286 · Cited by 109
How and when peers’ positive mood influences employees’ voice.
Liu, W., Tangirala, S., Lam, W., Chen, Z., Jia, R. T., & Huang, X. (2015) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0038066 · Cited by 110
Retention of IT professionals: Examining the influence of empowerment, social exchange, and trust
Ertürk, A., & Vurgun, L. (2015) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.05.010 · Cited by 107
The evolution of leadership: Past insights, present trends, and future directions
Liden, R. C., Wang, X., & Wang, Y. (2025) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.115036 · Cited by 107
Meza, R. D., Triplett, N. S., Woodard, G. S., Martin, P., Khairuzzaman, A. N., Jamora, G., & Dorsey, S. (2021) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-021-01104-4 · Cited by 76
Kim, D., Moon, C. W., & Shin, J. (2018) · Leadership & Organization Development Journal · doi:10.1108/lodj-06-2017-0173 · Cited by 86
POPPER, M. (2004) · Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour · doi:10.1111/j.0021-8308.2004.00238.x · Cited by 76
Seo, J. (., Nahrgang, J. D., Carter, M. Z., & Hom, P. W. (2018) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000262 · Cited by 75
Gooty, J., Serban, A., Thomas, J. S., Gavin, M. B., & Yammarino, F. J. (2012) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.10.002 · Cited by 71
Nayani, R. J., Nielsen, K., Daniels, K., Donaldson-Feilder, E. J., & Lewis, R. C. (2018) · Work & Stress · doi:10.1080/02678373.2017.1390797 · Cited by 58
Leadership and technostress: A systematic literature review
Rademaker, T., Klingenberg, I., & Süß, S. (2025) · Management Review Quarterly · doi:10.1007/s11301-023-00385-x · Cited by 59
Supported Supervisors Are More Supportive, but Why? A Multilevel Study of Mechanisms and Outcomes
Frear, K. A., Donsbach, J., Theilgard, N., & Shanock, L. R. (2018) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-016-9485-2 · Cited by 53
Jada, U. R., & Mukhopadhyay, S. (2019) · Personnel Review · doi:10.1108/pr-11-2017-0365 · Cited by 52
Crawford (2023) · doi:10.53761/1.20.01.01 · Cited by 52
Keegan, A., & Den Hartog, D. (2019) · Human Resource Management Journal · doi:10.1111/1748-8583.12216 · Cited by 47
Metadata
- Authors
- Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Cincinnati (US)
- Venue
- The Leadership Quarterly
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1995-06
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 219-247
- ISSN
- 1048-9843 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2099808856
- Cited by
- 7,299
- References
- 96
- Citations by year
- 2026: 438 · 2025: 423 · 2024: 420 · 2023: 472 · 2022: 432 · 2021: 454 · 2020: 435 · 2019: 406 · 2018: 367 · 2017: 353 · 2016: 355 · 2015: 370 · 2014: 374 · 2013: 305 · 2012: 310
- FWCI
- 26.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Leadership Quarterly (publishedVersion)
- Lincoln (University of Nebraska) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Leadership and Management in Organizations
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
- Keywords
- leader-member exchange, LMX theory, relational leadership, multi-level perspective, dyads
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review