Cited by 619Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Differential patterns of striatal activation in young children with and without ADHD

Abstract

Background Cognitive control, defined as the ability to suppress inappropriate thoughts and actions, is compromised in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). This study examines the neural basis of this deficit.Methods We used a paradigm that incorporates a parametric manipulation within a go/nogo task, so that the number of go trials preceding a nogo trial is varied to tax the neural systems underlying cognitive control with increasing levels of interference.Results Using this paradigm in combination with event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), we show that children without ADHD have increased susceptibility to interference with increasing numbers of go trials preceding a nogo trial, but children with ADHD have difficulty even with a single go trial preceding a nogo trial. In addition, children with ADHD do not activate frontostriatal regions in the same manner as normally developing children, but rather rely on a more diffuse network of regions, including more posterior and dorsolateral prefrontal regions.Conclusions Normal immature cognition may be characterized as being susceptible to interference and supported by the maturation of frontostriatal circuitry. ADHD children show a slightly different cognitive profile at 6 to 10 years of age that is paralleled by a relative lack of or delay in the maturation of ventral frontostriatal circuitry.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0006-3223(02)01904-2

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 12 references

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. Barkley, 1997, Behavioral inhibition, sustained attention and executive functions, Psychol Bull, 21, 65, 10.1037/0033-2909.121.1.65 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Bunge SA, Hazeltine E, Scanlon MD, Rosen AC, Gabrieli JDE (2002): Dissociable contributions of prefrontal and parietal cortices to response selection. Neuroimage 17:1562–1571 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Burgund ED, Kang HC, Kelly JE, Buckner RL, Snyder AZ, Petersen SE, et al (2002): The feasibility of a common stereotactic space for children and adults in fMRI studies of development. Neuroimage 17:184–200 · DOI
  4. Bush, 1999, Anterior cingulate cortex dysfunction in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder revealed by fMRI and the Counting Stroop, Biol Psychiatry, 45, 1542, 10.1016/S0006-3223(99)00083-9 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Carver, 2001, Age related changes in inhibitory control as measured by stop signal task performance, Int J Neurosci, 107, 43, 10.3109/00207450109149756 · DOI
  6. Casey, 2001, Sensitivity of prefrontal cortex to changes in target probability, Hum Brain Mapp, 13, 26, 10.1002/hbm.1022 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Castellanos, 2001, Quantitative brain magnetic resonance imaging in girls with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, Arch Gen Psychiatry, 58, 289, 10.1001/archpsyc.58.3.289 · DOI
  8. Conners, 1969, A teacher rating scale for use in drug studies with children, Am J Psychiatry, 126, 884, 10.1176/ajp.126.6.884 · DOI
  9. Cox, 1996, AFNI, Comput Biomed Res, 29, 162, 10.1006/cbmr.1996.0014 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Diamond, 1990, Developmental time course in human infants and infant monkeys, and the neural bases of inhibitory control in reaching, Ann N Y Acad Sci, 608, 637, 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1990.tb48913.x · DOI
  11. Diamond, 1994, AB with multiple wells, Dev Psychol, 30, 192, 10.1037/0012-1649.30.2.192 · DOI
  12. Diamond, 1996, Development of an aspect of executive control, Dev Psychobiol, 29, 315, 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2302(199605)29:4<315::AID-DEV2>3.0.CO;2-T · DOI · Paper page
  13. Durston, 2002, The effect of preceding context on inhibition, Neuroimage, 16, 449, 10.1006/nimg.2002.1074 · DOI
  14. Enns, 1989, A developmental study of filtering in visual attention, Child Dev, 60, 1188, 10.2307/1130792 · DOI
  15. Enns, 1987, Selective attention in young children, J Exp Child Psychol, 44, 38, 10.1016/0022-0965(87)90021-X · DOI
  16. Gerstadt, 1994, The relationship between cognition and action, Cognition, 53, 129, 10.1016/0010-0277(94)90068-X · DOI · Paper page
  17. Konishi, 1999, Common inhibitory mechanism in inferior prefrontal cortex revealed by event-related functional MRI, Brain, 122, 981, 10.1093/brain/122.5.981 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Lou, 1984, Focal cerebral hypoperfusion in children with dysphasia and/or attention deficit disorder, Arch Neurol, 41, 825, 10.1001/archneur.1984.04050190031010 · DOI
  19. Passler, 1985, Neuropsychological development of behavior attributed to frontal lobe functioning in children, Dev Neuropsychol, 1, 349, 10.1080/87565648509540320 · DOI
  20. Ridderinkhof, 1997, Mental resources, processing speed, and inhibitory control, Biol Psychol, 45, 241, 10.1016/S0301-0511(96)05230-1 · DOI
  21. Ridderinkhof, 1997, Sources of interference from irrelevant information, J Exp Child Psychol, 65, 315, 10.1006/jecp.1997.2367 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Rubia, 1999, Hypofrontality in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder during higher-order motor control, Am J Psychiatry, 156, 891, 10.1176/ajp.156.6.891 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Semrud-Clikeman, 2000, Using MRI to examine brain-behavior relationships in males with attention deficit disorder with hyperactivity, J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry, 39, 477, 10.1097/00004583-200004000-00017 · DOI
  24. Tipper, 1989, Mechanisms of attention, J Exp Child Psychol, 48, 353, 10.1016/0022-0965(89)90047-7 · DOI
  25. Vaidya, 1998, Selective effects of methylphenidate in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 95, 14494, 10.1073/pnas.95.24.14494 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Woods, 1992, Rapid automated algorithm for aligning and reslicing PET images, J Comput Assist Tomogr, 16, 620, 10.1097/00004728-199207000-00024 · DOI
  27. Zametkin, 1990, Cerebral glucose metabolism in adults with hyperactivity of childhood onset, N Engl J Med, 323, 1361, 10.1056/NEJM199011153232001 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Durston, S., Tottenham, N. T., Thomas, K. M., Davidson, M. C., Eigsti, I.-M., Yang, Y., Ulug, A. M., & Casey, B. J.
Affiliations
Cornell University (US)
Corresponding author
Durston, Sarah
Venue
Biological Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-05
Volume
53
Issue
10
Pages
871-878
ISSN
0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2075476435
Cited by
619
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 41 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 34
FWCI
20.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, cognitive control, striatal activation, frontostriatal circuits, go/no-go task, interference, cognitive maturation, young children, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, ventral striatum
MeSH terms
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Brain, Child, Cognition Disorders, Corpus Striatum, Female, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Case-Control Studies, Echo-Planar Imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review