The DOI matches its Crossref record; 87 of the 87 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 105 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Principles and clinical implications of the brain-gut-enteric microbiota axis
Open accessAbstract
While bidirectional brain–gut interactions are well known mechanisms for the regulation of gut function in both healthy and diseased states, a role of the enteric flora—including both commensal and pathogenic organisms—in these interactions has only been recognized in the past few years. The brain can influence commensal organisms (enteric microbiota) indirectly, via changes in gastrointestinal motility and secretion, and intestinal permeability, or directly, via signaling molecules released into the gut lumen from cells in the lamina propria (enterochromaffin cells, neurons, immune cells). Communication from enteric microbiota to the host can occur via multiple mechanisms, including epithelial-cell, receptor-mediated signaling and, when intestinal permeability is increased, through direct stimulation of host cells in the lamina propria. Enterochromaffin cells are important bidirectional transducers that regulate communication between the gut lumen and the nervous system. Vagal, afferent innervation of enterochromaffin cells provides a direct pathway for enterochromaffin-cell signaling to neuronal circuits, which may have an important role in pain and immune-response modulation, control of background emotions and other homeostatic functions. Disruption of the bidirectional interactions between the enteric microbiota and the nervous system may be involved in the pathophysiology of acute and chronic gastrointestinal disease states, including functional and inflammatory bowel disorders.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This review synthesizes evidence for bidirectional signaling between the CNS and the enteric microbiota—the "brain–gut–enteric microbiota axis"—and proposes enterochromaffin cells as key bidirectional transducers. It argues that disruption of these interactions may contribute to functional and inflammatory bowel disorders, though causative roles remain unproven.
Key findings
- The brain can influence commensal organisms indirectly (via ANS-mediated changes in motility, secretion, and intestinal permeability) and directly via signaling molecules (catecholamines, serotonin, dynorphin, cytokines) released into the gut lumen from neurons, immune cells, and enterochromaffin cells.
- Microbe-to-host signaling occurs via epithelial receptor-mediated mechanisms (e.g., Toll-like receptors) and, when permeability is increased, through direct stimulation of lamina propria cells; the autoinducer-3–QseC system in enterohemorrhagic *E. coli* is activated by host norepinephrine, enabling interkingdom signaling during stress.
- Enterochromaffin cells are positioned to act as bidirectional transducers: they secrete serotonin and peptides in response to luminal microbial factors and central stimuli, and vagal afferents expressing 5-HT3R lie in close proximity.
- Germ-free mice showed less intense inflammation-associated hyperalgesia than conventional mice, associated with increased interleukin-10 expression, reversed by anti-interleukin-10 antibody; the human gut harbors 400–1,000 bacterial species with ~10¹¹ bacterial cells per gram of colon contents.
- Two cited RCTs: 4-week *Bifidobacterium lactis* reduced abdominal distention and accelerated orocecal/colonic transit in IBS with constipation; 8-week *Bifidobacterium infantis* improved symptoms and normalized the plasma IL-10:IL-12 ratio.
Methods
- Narrative review (not a primary study) summarizing preclinical and clinical evidence on bidirectional nervous system–enteric microbiota interactions.
- Draws on animal models (rhesus monkeys, mice, rats, pigs), in vitro studies, and human clinical trials, including cited randomized controlled trials of probiotics in IBS.
- Organizes evidence into brain-to-microbiota signaling, microbe-to-gut-to-brain signaling, enterochromaffin cell transduction, vagal transmission, homeostatic functions, and clinical/therapeutic implications.
Limitations
- The paper states that evidence is "often sparse," that host-to-enteric bacteria signaling has been characterized in detail only for pathogenic organisms and only for some molecules (norepinephrine, dynorphins, cytokines), and that considerably more data are needed to establish a causative role for microbiota changes in IBS symptoms.
- The paper notes most studies of CNS influence on microbiota used luminal bacterial populations from stool samples, with biofilm-adjacent organisms less well documented.
- Evident from the text: this is a review without primary data or systematic search methodology, and several proposed mechanisms (e.g., enterochromaffin cell signaling to brain function, adrenergic receptors on epithelial brush border) are explicitly described as not yet studied in detail.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
0 of 105 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the mechanisms that underlie the observed effects are poorly understood.”
§ Principles and clinical implications of the brain–gut–enteric microbiota axis > Introduction
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The enteric microbiota can directly influence gut homeostasis by the regulation of bowel motility and modulation of intestinal pain, immune responses, and nutrient processing.8-10”
§ Principles and clinical implications of the brain–gut–enteric microbiota axis > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [8] Husebye, E., Hellstrom, P. M., Sundler, F., Chen, J. & Midtvedt, T. Influence of microbial species on small intestinal myoelectric activity and transit in germ-free rats. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 280, G368–G380 (2001). source
- Not checked yetcites [9] Rhee, S. H. et al. Pathophysiological role of Toll-like receptor 5 engagement by bacterial flagellin in colonic inflammation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 13610–13615 (2005). source
- Not checked yetcites [10] Ait-Belgnaoui, A. et al. Lactobacillus farciminis treatment suppresses stress induced visceral hypersensitivity: a possible action through interaction with epithelial cell cytoskeleton contraction. Gut 55, 1090–1094 (2006). source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Enterochromaffin cells are important bidirectional transducers that regulate communication between the gut lumen and the nervous system.”
§ Principles and clinical implications of the brain–gut–enteric microbiota axis > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearIn the paper
“while accelerated intestinal transit, with an increased number of giant, migrating contractions, is seen in many diarrheal states, including diarrhea-predominant IBS.22”
§ Principles and clinical implications of the brain–gut–enteric microbiota axis > CNS-related changes in gut environment
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [22] Chey, W. Y. et al. Colonic motility abnormality in patients with irritable bowel syndrome exhibiting abdominal pain and diarrhea. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 96, 1499–1506 (2001). source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Impaired intestinal transit caused by compromised, migrating motor complexes (a motor pattern characteristic of the fasting state of the gastrointestinal tract that is under parasympathetic control), is associated with bacterial overgrowth in the small intestine.20”
§ Principles and clinical implications of the brain–gut–enteric microbiota axis > CNS-related changes in gut environment
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [20] Van Felius, I. D. et al. Interdigestive small bowel motility and duodenal bacterial overgrowth in experimental acute pancreatitis. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 15, 267–276 (2003). source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Different types of psychological stressors modulate the composition and total biomass of the enteric microbiota in both adult15 and newborn animals.16”
§ Principles and clinical implications of the brain–gut–enteric microbiota axis > Brain to enteric microbiota signaling
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [15] Schaedler, R. W. & Dubos, R. J. The fecal flora of various strains of mice. Its bearing on their susceptibility to endotoxin. J. Exp. Med. 115, 1149–1160 (1962). source
- Not checked yetcites [16] Bailey, M. T. & Coe, C. L. Maternal separation disrupts the integrity of the intestinal microflora in infant rhesus monkeys. Dev. Psychobiol. 35, 146–155 (1999). source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“In this case, the shedding of lactobacilli may have been related to the stress-induced acceleration of intestinal transit, since normal bacterial levels were restored 1 week after separation.16”
§ Principles and clinical implications of the brain–gut–enteric microbiota axis > Brain to enteric microbiota signaling
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [16] Bailey, M. T. & Coe, C. L. Maternal separation disrupts the integrity of the intestinal microflora in infant rhesus monkeys. Dev. Psychobiol. 35, 146–155 (1999). source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Although different types of psychological stressors, including early-life stress and sustained stress, have been recognized as risk factors or promoters of events that result in disease exacerbation in patients with ulcerative colitis2 and IBS,3”
§ Principles and clinical implications of the brain–gut–enteric microbiota axis > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [2] Levenstein, S. et al. Stress and exacerbation in ulcerative colitis: a prospective study of patients enrolled in remission. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 95, 1213–1220 (2000). source
- Not checked yetcites [3] Whitehead, W. E., Crowell, M. D., Robinson, J. C., Heller, B. R. & Schuster, M. M. Effects of stressful life events on bowel symptoms: subjects with irritable bowel syndrome compared with subjects without bowel dysfunction. Gut 33, 825–830 (1992). source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The activation of any of these systems, either alone or in combination, might influence enteric microbiota both indirectly, via changes in their environment, and directly, via host–enteric microbiota signaling.”
§ Principles and clinical implications of the brain–gut–enteric microbiota axis > Brain to enteric microbiota signaling
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearIn the paper
“Both sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous systems, which are part of the ANS, have a prominent role in the modulation of gut functions, such as motility, secretion of acid, bicarbonates and mucus, intestinal-fluid handling and mucosal immune response (reviewed elsewhere1).”
§ Principles and clinical implications of the brain–gut–enteric microbiota axis > CNS-related changes in gut environment
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [1] Mayer, E. A. The neurobiology of stress and gastrointestinal disease. Gut 47, 861–869 (2000). source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes
- It may state two separate claims as one. 31
- Probably not a substantial claim. 13
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The brain can influence commensal organisms (enteric microbiota) indirectly, via changes in gastrointestinal motility and secretion, and intestinal permeability, or directly, via signaling molecules released into the gut lumen from cells in the lamina propria (enterochromaffin cells, neurons, immune cells).”
§ Principles and clinical implications of the brain–gut–enteric microbiota axis > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In maternal separation-induced, postnatal stress, reduction in lactobacilli was associated with the appearance of stress-indicative behaviors, and affected animals were more susceptible than unstressed controls to opportunistic infection.”
§ Principles and clinical implications of the brain–gut–enteric microbiota axis > Brain to enteric microbiota signaling
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [16] Bailey, M. T. & Coe, C. L. Maternal separation disrupts the integrity of the intestinal microflora in infant rhesus monkeys. Dev. Psychobiol. 35, 146–155 (1999). source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Vagal, afferent innervation of enterochromaffin cells provides a direct pathway for enterochromaffin-cell signaling to neuronal circuits, which may have an important role in pain and immune-response modulation, control of background emotions and other homeostatic functions.”
§ Principles and clinical implications of the brain–gut–enteric microbiota axis > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the role of the enteric microbiota in bidirectional gut–brain interactions in health and disease has received little attention until the past 5 years or so.”
§ Principles and clinical implications of the brain–gut–enteric microbiota axis > Introduction
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Both pre natal17 and postnatal stress16 were associated with transient reductions in the levels of the enteric microbiota in rhesus monkeys.”
§ Principles and clinical implications of the brain–gut–enteric microbiota axis > Brain to enteric microbiota signaling
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [17] Bailey, M. T. et al. Prenatal stress alters bacterial colonization of the gut in infant monkeys. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 38, 414–421 (2004). source
- Not checked yetcites [16] Bailey, M. T. & Coe, C. L. Maternal separation disrupts the integrity of the intestinal microflora in infant rhesus monkeys. Dev. Psychobiol. 35, 146–155 (1999). source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In general, bacteria located in the biofilm seem to be less affected by environmental alterations, such as changes in intestinal transit rate and luminal contents, than luminal populations are, but seem to have increased involvement in bidirectional signaling with the host.19”
§ Principles and clinical implications of the brain–gut–enteric microbiota axis > Brain to enteric microbiota signaling
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [19] Macfarlane, S. & Dillon, J. F. Microbial biofilms in the human gastrointestinal tract. J. Appl. Microbiol. 102, 1187–1196 (2007). source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“For example, several studies have demonstrated that stressful stimuli can enhance the permeability of the intestinal epithelium, which allows bacterial antigens to penetrate the gut epithelium and triggers an immune response in the intestinal mucosa.23-27”
§ Principles and clinical implications of the brain–gut–enteric microbiota axis > CNS-related changes in gut environment
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [23] Kiliaan, A. J. et al. Stress stimulates transepithelial macromolecular uptake in rat jejunum. Am. J. Physiol. 275, G1037–G1044 (1998).
- Not checked yetcites [24] Groot, J. et al. Stress-induced decrease of the intestinal barrier function. The role of muscarinic receptor activation. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 915, 237–246 (2000). source
- Not checked yetcites [25] Yates, D. A., Santos, J., Soderholm, J. D. & Perdue, M. H. Adaptation of stress-induced mucosal pathophysiology in rat colon involves opioid pathways. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 281, G124–G128 (2001). source
- Not checked yetcites [26] Soderholm, J. D. et al. Neonatal maternal separation predisposes adult rats to colonic barrier dysfunction in response to mild stress. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 283, G1257–G1263 (2002). source
- Not checked yetcites [27] Jacob, C. et al. Mast cell tryptase controls paracellular permeability of the intestine. Role of protease-activated receptor 2 and beta-arrestins. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 31936–31948 (2005). source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The ANS also affects epithelial mechanisms involved in immune activation of the gut, either directly, through modulation of the response of the gut immune cells (for example, macrophages and mast cells) to luminal bacteria, or indirectly, through alteration of the access of luminal bacteria to gut immunocytes (Figure 2).”
§ Principles and clinical implications of the brain–gut–enteric microbiota axis > CNS-related changes in gut environment
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Notably, most of the studies that have examined the influence of these systems on enteric microbiota have been performed on luminal bacterial populations from stool samples, whereas the influence of these systems on organisms contained in the biofilm adjacent to the intestinal mucosa are less well documented.”
§ Principles and clinical implications of the brain–gut–enteric microbiota axis > Brain to enteric microbiota signaling
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“For example, serotonin secretion into the stomach lumen has been reported in response to an intrathecal injection into the cerebrospinal fluid (central injection) of TRP, an analog of thyrotropin-releasing hormone, which is a central mediator of the stress response to cold temperatures.31,32 This secretion is probably mediated by vagal activation of gastric enterochromaffin cells.”
§ Principles and clinical implications of the brain–gut–enteric microbiota axis > CNS modulation of gut–microbe signaling
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [31] Stephens, R. L. & Tache, Y. Intracisternal injection of a TRH analogue stimulates gastric luminal serotonin release in rats. Am. J. Physiol. 256, G377–G383 (1989).
- Not checked yetcites [32] Yang, H. et al. TRH analogue microinjected into specific medullary nuclei stimulates gastric serotonin secretion in rats. Am. J. Physiol. 262, G216–G222 (1992).
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“For example, secretion of antimicrobial peptides, such as defensins, by Paneth cells has an important role in host defense mechanisms against inflammatory and infectious diseases of the gut.29”
§ Principles and clinical implications of the brain–gut–enteric microbiota axis > CNS modulation of gut–microbe signaling
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [29] Salzman, N. H., Underwood, M. A. & Bevins, C. L. Paneth cells, defensins, and the commensal microbiota: a hypothesis on intimate interplay at the intestinal mucosa. Semin. Immunol. 19, 70–83 (2007). source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“For example, Bifidobacterium bifidum and Lactobacillus acidophilus are able to promote motility, while Escherichia species can inhibit it.6”
§ Principles and clinical implications of the brain–gut–enteric microbiota axis > Bidirectional signaling
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [6] Mazmanian, S. K. et al. A microbial symbiosis factor prevents intestinal inflammatory disease. Nature 453, 620–625 (2008). source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Several signaling molecules used by the host for neuronal and neuroendocrine signaling (for example, catecholamines, serotonin, dynorphin, and cytokines) are also likely to be secreted into the gut lumen by neurons, immune cells and enterochromaffin cells, and the CNS is likely to have an important role in the release of these molecules.”
§ Principles and clinical implications of the brain–gut–enteric microbiota axis > CNS modulation of gut–microbe signaling
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Similarly to eukaryotes, prokaryotes communicate with each other through hormones and hormone-like compounds. This pattern of mutual bacterial inter action is called quorum sensing.41”
§ Principles and clinical implications of the brain–gut–enteric microbiota axis > Bidirectional signaling
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [41] Nealson, K. H., Platt, T. & Hastings, J. W. Cellular control of the synthesis and activity of the bacterial luminescent system. J. Bacteriol. 104, 313–322 (1970). source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Autoinducer 3 binds to the bacterial membrane receptor QseC, which results in its autophosphorylation. QseC then phosphorylates its response regulator, QseB, to initiate a complex signaling cascade that activates the expression of bacterial genes associated with virulence and motility, including the gene that presides over flagellum development.34”
§ Principles and clinical implications of the brain–gut–enteric microbiota axis > Bidirectional signaling
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [34] Hughes, D. T. & Sperandio, V. Inter-kingdom signalling: communication between bacteria and their hosts. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 6, 111–120 (2008). source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Stress-induced changes in permeability involve activation of glial and mast cells in the gut, overproduction of interferon-γ and changes in the morphology of the colonic epithelium via reduced expression of tight junction protein 2 (zona occludens 2) and by occlusion of important components of the intestinal tight junction.28”
§ Principles and clinical implications of the brain–gut–enteric microbiota axis > CNS-related changes in gut environment
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [28] Demaude, J. et al. Phenotypic changes in colonocytes following acute stress or activation of mast cells in mice: implications for delayed epithelial barrier dysfunction. Gut 55, 655–661 (2006). source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In vitro norepinephrine stimulates the growth of several strains of enteric pathogens (reviewed elsewhere34) and magnifies the virulent properties of Campylobacter jejuni.36”
§ Principles and clinical implications of the brain–gut–enteric microbiota axis > CNS modulation of gut–microbe signaling
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [34] Hughes, D. T. & Sperandio, V. Inter-kingdom signalling: communication between bacteria and their hosts. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 6, 111–120 (2008). source
- Not checked yetcites [36] Cogan, T. A. et al. Norepinephrine increases the pathogenic potential of Campylobacter jejuni. Gut 56, 1060–1065 (2007). source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“For example, autoinducer 3 can stimulate nor epinephrine receptors on the surface of eukaryotic cells, and α-2 receptors are present on the brush border of human enterocytes.51”
§ Principles and clinical implications of the brain–gut–enteric microbiota axis > Microbe–gut–brain signaling
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [51] Valet, P. et al. Characterization and distribution of alpha 2-adrenergic receptors in the human intestinal mucosa. J. Clin. Invest. 91, 2049–2055 (1993). source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although the effects of enteric microbiota to host signaling on various gut functions, including motility, secretion and immune function, have been studied extensively in healthy and diseased states, the possible effect of such microbial signaling beyond the gastro intestinal tract and on the nervous system has received little attention.”
§ Principles and clinical implications of the brain–gut–enteric microbiota axis > Microbe–gut–brain signaling
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Microbial signaling molecules could interact directly with afferent nerve terminals in situations where intestinal permeability is enhanced (for example, during inflammation or stress) or their signal could be relayed to neurons within the intestinal wall by ‘transducer cells’ in the epithelium.”
§ Principles and clinical implications of the brain–gut–enteric microbiota axis > Microbe–gut–brain signaling
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“That signaling molecules are released by the host into the lumen of the gastrointestinal tract during stress and that receptors and intercellular signaling mechanisms for these same molecules are present on certain luminal microbes34 strongly suggests that the nervous system can also directly modulate microbial behavior.”
§ Principles and clinical implications of the brain–gut–enteric microbiota axis > Bidirectional signaling
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [34] Hughes, D. T. & Sperandio, V. Inter-kingdom signalling: communication between bacteria and their hosts. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 6, 111–120 (2008). source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Enterochromaffin cells are distributed throughout the intestinal tract,52 and, like intestinal epithelial cells, those located in the intestinal mucosa are accessible to the enteric microbiota on the intestinal lumen side, and are in contact with afferent and efferent nerve terminals located on the lamina propria.”
§ Principles and clinical implications of the brain–gut–enteric microbiota axis > Enterochromaffin cells as signal transducers
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [52] Walsh, J. H. & Mayer, E. A. Gastrointestinal peptide hormones and signal transduction. In Gastrointestinal Disease: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, Management 5th edn (Eds Sleizenger, M. & Fordtran, J.) 18–44 (WB Saunders, Philadelphia, 1993).
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Similar mechanisms could have a role in the patho physiology of alterations in bowel habits for patients with IBS.”
§ Principles and clinical implications of the brain–gut–enteric microbiota axis > Microbe–gut–brain signaling
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, whereas the bacterial adrenergic agonist autoinducer 3 may mediate inhibition of intestinal fluid secretion—and thus delay transit rate—by binding to α-2 receptors on epithelial cells, other microbial factors may stimulate serotonin release by enterochromaffin cells to enhance fluid secretion, and thus accelerate transit rate.”
§ Principles and clinical implications of the brain–gut–enteric microbiota axis > Enterochromaffin cells as signal transducers
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This increase in luminal fluid in turn stimulates bowel motility, which ultimately helps remove intestinal contents, including pathogenic bacteria.”
§ Principles and clinical implications of the brain–gut–enteric microbiota axis > Enterochromaffin cells as signal transducers
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Interestingly, olfactory and taste receptors are expressed in enterochromaffin cells, and odorants present in the luminal environment (probably produced by the enteric microbiota) are also able to effect serotonin release by these cells.53”
§ Principles and clinical implications of the brain–gut–enteric microbiota axis > Enterochromaffin cells as signal transducers
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [53] Braun, T., Voland, P., Kunz, L., Prinz, C. & Gratzl, M. Enterochromaffin cells of the human gut: sensors for spices and odorants. Gastroenterology 132, 1890–1901 (2007). source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Nerve terminals of vagal afferents are located in close proximity to enterochromaffin cells, and these terminals express the serotonin-specific receptor 5-HT3R.67”
§ Principles and clinical implications of the brain–gut–enteric microbiota axis > Vagal transmission of luminal signals
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [67] Raybould, H. E., Cooke, H. J. & Christofi, F. L. Sensory mechanisms: transmitters, modulators and reflexes. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 16 (Suppl. 1), 60–63 (2004). source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A mechanism of this type might explain the reported upregulation of mucosal serotonin in a mouse model of postinfectious bowel dysfunction.66”
§ Principles and clinical implications of the brain–gut–enteric microbiota axis > Enterochromaffin cells as signal transducers
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [66] Wheatcroft, J. et al. Enterochromaffin cell hyperplasia and decreased serotonin transporter in a mouse model of postinfectious bowel dysfunction. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 17, 863–870 (2005). source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“The cholera toxin, a secretory enterotoxin from Vibrio cholerae, is known to trigger intestinal-fluid secretion by binding to the GM1 ganglioside on the surface of enterochromaffin cells. This interaction results in serotonin-mediated activation of secretomotor reflexes.61”
§ Principles and clinical implications of the brain–gut–enteric microbiota axis > Enterochromaffin cells as signal transducers
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [61] Lencer, W. I. Microbes and microbial toxins: paradigms for microbial-mucosal toxins. V. Cholera: invasion of the intestinal epithelial barrier by a stably folded protein toxin. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 280, G781–G786 (2001). source
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Inflammation-induced upregulation of serotonin signaling persists after the inflammation has receded, and, in this post inflammatory, upregulated state, microbe to entero chromaffin cell signaling may result in persistent symptoms of bowel dysfunction in human, post infectious IBS.”
§ Principles and clinical implications of the brain–gut–enteric microbiota axis > Enterochromaffin cells as signal transducers
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The influence on the brain of stimuli such as cytokines and vagal signaling has been well characterized in animal models of inflammation, and the constellation of psychological symptoms associated with inflammation (fatigue, social withdrawal and loss of appetite) has been labeled the sickness behavior syndrome.72”
§ Principles and clinical implications of the brain–gut–enteric microbiota axis > Enteric microbiota and homeostatic functions
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [72] Watkins, L. R. & Maier, S. F. The pain of being sick: implications of immune-to-brain communication for understanding pain. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 51, 29–57 (2000). source
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“As afferent nerves are not exposed to the luminal side of the intestine, under normal circumstances sensory neurons are indirectly activated by stimuli in the intestinal lumen via paracrine signaling, which is mediated by compounds such as serotonin, cholecystokinin, histamine, secretin, somatostatin, melatonin, uroguanylin, and corticotrophin-releasing factor, all of which can be released from ne”
§ Principles and clinical implications of the brain–gut–enteric microbiota axis > Vagal transmission of luminal signals
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [68] Schonhoff, S. E., Giel-Moloney, M. & Leiter, A. B. Minireview: development and differentiation of gut endocrine cells. Endocrinology 145, 2639–2644 (2004). source
- Not checked yetcites [69] O'Hara, J. R., Ho, W., Linden, D. R., Mawe, G. M. & Sharkey, K. A. Enteroendocrine cells and 5-HT availability are altered in mucosa of guinea pigs with TNBS ileitis. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 287, G998–G1007 (2004). source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As discussed earlier, in the presence of increased intestinal permeability (caused, for instance, by stress or gut inflammation), access of various bacterial products and inflammatory mediators to nerve endings in the mucosa would be a plausible mechanism for microbe to brain communication.”
§ Principles and clinical implications of the brain–gut–enteric microbiota axis > Enteric microbiota and homeostatic functions
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Possible mechanisms underlying such changes include effects secondary to the production of gas and short-chain fatty acids by enteric microbiota, and direct enteric microbiota to host signaling.”
§ Principles and clinical implications of the brain–gut–enteric microbiota axis > Clinical impact of bidirectional signaling
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Evidence of activation of the afferent vagal system was reported, which suggests a possible vagus-mediated microbe to brain signaling pathway.”
§ Principles and clinical implications of the brain–gut–enteric microbiota axis > Enteric microbiota and homeostatic functions
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [73] Lyte, M., Li, W., Opitz, N., Gaykema, R. P. & Goehler, L. E. Induction of anxiety-like behavior in mice during the initial stages of infection with the agent of murine colonic hyperplasia Citrobacter rodentium. Physiol. Behav. 89, 350–357 (2006). source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, in healthy organisms, signaling via epithelial transducer cells, such as enterochromaffin cells, may be the predominant mechanism.”
§ Principles and clinical implications of the brain–gut–enteric microbiota axis > Enteric microbiota and homeostatic functions
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In postinfectious IBS, major psychological stress around the time of gastroenteritis, trait anxiety, as well as extended duration of the infection, have been identified as risk factors for the persistence of symptoms.81”
§ Principles and clinical implications of the brain–gut–enteric microbiota axis > Clinical impact of bidirectional signaling
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [81] Gwee, K. A. et al. The role of psychological and biological factors in postinfective gut dysfunction. Gut 44, 400–406 (1999). source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“One way to explain this resilience would be to consider the epithelium-associated biofilm as a permanent bacterial reservoir whose presence allows prompt reconstitution of the physiological microbiota profile in the gut lumen following a decline in luminal microbiota.”
§ Principles and clinical implications of the brain–gut–enteric microbiota axis > Clinical impact of bidirectional signaling
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: The gastrointestinal system is surprisingly resilient to transient changes in enteric microbiota induced by antibiotic treatment, colonic lavage, or, possibly, by spikes in psychological stress.
In the paper
“This reduction in abdominal girth was associ ated with an acceleration of orocecal as well as colonic transit and with an overall improvement in symptoms.”
§ Principles and clinical implications of the brain–gut–enteric microbiota axis > Potential therapeutic implications
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [13] Agrawal, A. et al. Clinical trial: the effects of a fermented milk product containing Bifidobacterium lactis DN-173-010 on abdominal distension and gastrointestinal transit in irritable bowel syndrome with constipation. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. (In press).
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Inflammation-induced upregulation of the mucosal serotonin signaling system would be expected to enhance the ability of the enteric microbiota to modulate gut motility through activation of peristaltic and secretomotor reflexes.”
§ Principles and clinical implications of the brain–gut–enteric microbiota axis > Clinical impact of bidirectional signaling
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Evidence suggests that modification of the enteric microbiota by administration of antibiotics, probiotic bacteria or prebiotic substances (for example, certain fibers or lactulose) are beneficial in the treatment of IBD14 and improve some symptoms of IBS.12”
§ Principles and clinical implications of the brain–gut–enteric microbiota axis > Potential therapeutic implications
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [14] Vanderpool, C., Yan, F. & Polk, D. B. Mechanisms of probiotic action: implications for therapeutic applications in inflammatory bowel diseases. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 14, 1585–1596 (2008). source
- Not checked yetcites [12] Spiller, P. Review article: probiotics and prebiotics in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. (2008).
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
Little is known about the possible role of direct signaling by luminal microorganisms to the brain in healthy and diseased states.
“However, little is known about the possible role of direct signaling by luminal microorganisms to the brain in healthy and diseased states.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The gastrointestinal system is surprisingly resilient to transient changes in enteric microbiota induced by antibiotic treatment, colonic lavage, or, possibly, by spikes in psychological stress.
“Notably, despite the intriguing possibility of adverse clinical consequences of long-term functional disruption in the brain–gut–microbe axis, the gastro intestinal system is surprisingly resilient to transient changes in enteric microbiota induced by antibiotic treatment, colonic lavage, or, possibly, by spikes in psychological stress.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Microbes can communicate with each other via metabolites, similar to those recognized by host cells and can thereby interact with gut ANS synapses (Rhee et al., 2009).”
From The Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis (2019) · cites this paper as Rhee et al., 2009
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The size and quality of the intestinal mucus layer is believed to be mediated by sympathetic innervation where mucosal immune system modulation (Elenkov et al., 2000) and microbial composition and behavior alterations (commensal and pathogenic) were seen (Macfarlane and Dillon, 2007;Rhee et al., 2009)”
From The Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis (2019) · cites this paper as Rhee et al., 2009
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The concept of the microbiota-gut-brain axis thus emerged (Cryan and O'Mahony, 2011;De Palma et al., 2014;Rhee et al., 2009) based upon the rich historical legacy of the illustrious scientific figures discussed above, amongst many others.”
From The Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis (2019) · cites this paper as Rhee et al., 2009
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Gut-brain communication can also be achieved through vagus nerve signaling (57).”
From The Role of Short-Chain Fatty Acids From Gut Microbiota in Gut-Brain Communication (2020) · cites this paper as [57]
In the citing paper
“By regulating gastrointestinal functions, e.g., motility, nutrient absorption, acid production and mucosal immunity, the brain shapes the gut habitat and therefore selects for a distinct microbial profile [62].”
In the citing paper
“There are evidence that the gut microbiota modulates the CNS via the ENS, the ANS, the HPA axis and vice versa [124,213]”
From Gut microbiota role in irritable bowel syndrome: New therapeutic strategies (2016) · cites this paper as [124]
In the citing paper
“Mounting evidence suggests that the gastrointestinal microbiota influences host behaviour via bi-directional communication through what has been coined the microbiota-gut-brain axis [17, 18, 20, 29, 50, 60, 71].”
From Distinct actions of the fermented beverage kefir on host behaviour, immunity and microbiome gut-brain modules in the mouse (2020) · cites this paper as [60]
In the citing paper
“It has been also lately recognized that the gut-brain interactions might be essentially influenced by the gut microbiota (Borre et al., 2014;Grenham et al., 2011;Rhee et al., 2009).”
From The Gut-Brain Axis in Parkinson’s Disease: Possibilities for Food-Based Therapies (2017) · cites this paper as Rhee et al., 2009
Citations
Cites
An obesity-associated gut microbiome with increased capacity for energy harvest
Turnbaugh, P. J., Ley, R. E., Mahowald, M. A., Magrini, V., Mardis, E. R., & Gordon, J. I. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05414 · Cited by 12,444
Turnbaugh, P. J., Ley, R. E., Hamady, M., Fraser-Liggett, C. M., Knight, R., & Gordon, J. I. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06244 · Cited by 6,091
Gut flora in health and disease
Guarner, F., & Malagelada, J. (2003) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(03)12489-0 · Cited by 3,480 · cited 1×
“Approximately 10 11 bacterial cells can be found per gram of colon contents”
Sudo, N., Chida, Y., Aiba, Y., Sonoda, J., Oyama, N., Yu, X., Kubo, C., & Koga, Y. (2004) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2004.063388 · Cited by 2,735 · cited 1×
“Inflammation-associated hyperalgesia induced by a variety of stimuli, including administration of proinflammatory cytokines, was less intense in germ-free mice than in conventional mice”
A microbial symbiosis factor prevents intestinal inflammatory disease
Mazmanian, S. K., Round, J. L., & Kasper, D. L. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07008 · Cited by 2,340 · cited 1×
“The human gut harbors 400–1,000 different bacterial species”
Elenkov, I. J., Wilder, R. L., Chrousos, G. P., & Vizi, E. S. (2000) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0031-6997(24)01470-4 · Cited by 2,252
Gershon, M. D., & Tack, J. (2007) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2006.11.002 · Cited by 1,563
O’Mahony, L., McCarthy, J., Kelly, P., Hurley, G., Luo, F., Chen, K., O’Sullivan, G. C., Kiely, B., Collins, J. K., Shanahan, F., et al. (2005) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2004.11.050 · Cited by 1,448
Cellular Control of the Synthesis and Activity of the Bacterial Luminescent System
Nealson, K. H., Platt, T., & Hastings, J. W. (1970) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.104.1.313-322.1970 · Cited by 1,301 · cited 1×
“This pattern of mutual bacterial interaction is called quorum sensing”
Kassinen, A., Krogius-Kurikka, L., Mäkivuokko, H., Rinttilä, T., Paulin, L., Corander, J., Malinen, E., Apajalahti, J., & Palva, A. (2007) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2007.04.005 · Cited by 1,002 · cited 1×
“A departure from the physiological balance of the enteric microbiota has been suggested as a factor in the pathophysiology of IBS, a condition in which abnormal gastrointestinal motility and secretion is implicated as a cause of alterations in bowel habits”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 999
Yarandi, S., Peterson, D. A., Treisman, G. J., Moran, T. H., & Pasricha, P. J. (2016) · Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility · doi:10.5056/jnm15146 · Cited by 308
Drosophila melanogaster as a model for human intestinal infection and pathology
Apidianakis, Y., & Rahme, L. G. (2011) · Disease Models & Mechanisms · doi:10.1242/dmm.003970 · Cited by 292
“2A,B), and this musculature is also innervated and oxygenated by a plexus of vasculature (Kvietys and Granger, 1986; Rhee et al., 2009).”
Tian, P., O’Riordan, K. J., Lee, Y. K., Wang, G., Zhao, J., Zhang, H., Cryan, J. F., & Chen, W. (2020) · Neurobiology of Stress · doi:10.1016/j.ynstr.2020.100216 · Cited by 297
“Discovering the role of the microbiota-gut-brain axis is one of the most important advances in the field of gastroenterology and psychology in the past decade (Bercik et al., 2011; Cryan et al., 2019; Foster and Neufeld, 2013; Rhee et al., 2009).”
BackgroundLabus, J. S., Hollister, E. B., Jacobs, J., Kirbach, K., Oezguen, N., Gupta, A., Acosta, J., Luna, R. A., Aagaard, K., Versalovic, J., et al. (2017) · Microbiome · doi:10.1186/s40168-017-0260-z · Cited by 284
Self-citationGut microbiota and gastrointestinal health: current concepts and future directions
Aziz, Q., Doré, J., Emmanuel, A., Guarner, F., & Quigley, E. M. M. (2013) · Neurogastroenterology & Motility · doi:10.1111/nmo.12046 · Cited by 280
Mayer, E. A., Labus, J. S., Tillisch, K., Cole, S. W., & Baldi, P. (2015) · Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1038/nrgastro.2015.121 · Cited by 293
Self-citationNishida, K., Sawada, D., Kuwano, Y., Tanaka, H., & Rokutan, K. (2019) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu11081859 · Cited by 305
“The microbial community of the gastrointestinal tract affects this communication system through immune, endocrine, and neural pathways [3].”
BackgroundSex hormones in the modulation of irritable bowel syndrome
Mulak, A. (2014) · World Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.3748/wjg.v20.i10.2433 · Cited by 287
Shen, L., Liu, L., & Ji, H. (2016) · Journal of Alzheimer s Disease · doi:10.3233/jad-160884 · Cited by 283
“The newly emerged concept of bidirectional microbiota–gut–brain axis in recent years should mainly account for the association between the gut microbiota alteration and AD[21, 22].”
O’Mahony, S. M., Felice, V. D., Nally, K., Savignac, H. M., Claesson, M. J., Scully, P., Woznicki, J., Hyland, N. P., Shanahan, F., Quigley, E. M., et al. (2014) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.07.054 · Cited by 272
“This has led to the concept of the brain–gut–microbiota axis (Rhee et al., 2009; Collins et al., 2012; Cryan and Dinan, 2012).”
BackgroundLaudadio, I., Fulci, V., Palone, F., Stronati, L., Cucchiara, S., & Carissimi, C. (2018) · OMICS A Journal of Integrative Biology · doi:10.1089/omi.2018.0013 · Cited by 286
“…and activity of the gut microbiota and the pathophysiology of several disorders such as depression, autism, allergies, and chronic inflammatory diseases (Cryan and Dinan, 2012; Gollwitzer and Marsland, 2014; Mayer et al., 2014; Rhee et al., 2009; Sekirov et al., 2010; Shreiner et al., 2015).”
The gut microbiome: the role of a virtual organ in the endocrinology of the host
Evans, J. M., Morris, L. S., & Marchesi, J. R. (2013) · Journal of Endocrinology · doi:10.1530/joe-13-0131 · Cited by 273
“Other groups have also shown a role for bacteria in modulating neurotransmitter precursors (Rhee et al. 2009, Wikoff et al. 2009, Heijtz et al. 2011).”
BackgroundGut-Brain Psychology: Rethinking Psychology From the Microbiota–Gut–Brain Axis
Liang, S., Wu, X., & Jin, F. (2018) · Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnint.2018.00033 · Cited by 279
Current Understanding of Gut Microbiota in Mood Disorders: An Update of Human Studies
Huang, T., Lai, J., Du, Y., Xu, Y., Ruan, L., & Hu, S. (2019) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2019.00098 · Cited by 276
The Gut Microbiome: A New Frontier in Autism Research
Mulle, J. G., Sharp, W. G., & Cubells, J. F. (2013) · Current Psychiatry Reports · doi:10.1007/s11920-012-0337-0 · Cited by 262
Jašarević, E., Howard, C. D., Misic, A. M., Beiting, D. P., & Bale, T. L. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep44182 · Cited by 262
Communication between gastrointestinal bacteria and the nervous system
Bravo, J. A., Julio-Pieper, M., Forsythe, P., Kunze, W., Dinan, T. G., Bienenstock, J., & Cryan, J. F. (2012) · Current Opinion in Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.coph.2012.09.010 · Cited by 261
“Intestinal microbiota Over the past few years, the intestinal microbiota has emerged as a new target for the treatment of functional gastrointestinal diseases, as there is a delicate balance between these bacteria, the gut epithelium and the gutassociated lymphoid tissue [4,7] which is important for maintaining homeos…”
BackgroundAbraham, D., Feher, J., Scuderi, G. L., Szabo, D., Dobolyi, A., Cservenak, M., Juhasz, J., Ligeti, B., Pongor, S., Gomez-Cabrera, M. C., et al. (2019) · Experimental Gerontology · doi:10.1016/j.exger.2018.12.005 · Cited by 260
“Direct bidirectional communication between the brain and the gut has been suggested (Dinan and Cryan, 2017; Rhee et al., 2009) as brain can alter gut function by influencing motility, secretion, blood flow and gut-associated immune function in response to psychological and physical stressors…”
Gut Microbial Dysbiosis in the Pathogenesis of Gastrointestinal Dysmotility and Metabolic Disorders
Singh, R., Zogg, H., Wei, L., Bartlett, A., Ghoshal, U. C., Rajender, S., & Ro, S. (2020) · Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility · doi:10.5056/jnm20149 · Cited by 274
“Bi-directional gut-brain interactions serve as important modulators of GI functionality influencing motility, gastric secretions, blood flow, immune activity, and visceral sensations.(108) Brain-to-gut bi-directional signaling can also affect the GI tract through indirect signaling between the gut microbiota and the h…”
BackgroundInfluentialThe gut microbiota–brain axis in neurological disorder
Ullah, H., Arbab, S., Tian, Y., Liu, C., Chen, Y., Li, Q., Khan, M. I. U., Hassan, I. U., & Li, K. (2023) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2023.1225875 · Cited by 292
Microbes, immunity, and behavior: psychoneuroimmunology meets the microbiome
Dinan, T. G., & Cryan, J. F. (2017) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2016.103 · Cited by 246
Irritable bowel syndrome, the microbiota and the gut-brain axis
Raskov, H., Burcharth, J., Pommergaard, H.-C., & Rosenberg, J. (2016) · Gut Microbes · doi:10.1080/19490976.2016.1218585 · Cited by 243
“Signals to and from the microbiota and CNS are dependant on signal transducing cells such as the enterochromaffine cells (EC) and dendritic cells (DC) secreting several transmitter substances such as 5HT, somatostatin, cholecystokinin and corticotropinreleasing hormone.(3) Efferent signals from CNS are conveyed to the…”
BackgroundInfluentialA review of probiotic supplementation in healthy adults: helpful or hype?
Khalesi, S., Bellissimo, N., Vandelanotte, C., Williams, S., Stanley, D., & Irwin, C. (2019) · European Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1038/s41430-018-0135-9 · Cited by 242
Luo, Y., Zeng, B., Zeng, L., Du, X., Li, B., Huo, R., Liu, L., Wang, H., Dong, M., Pan, J., et al. (2018) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41398-018-0240-5 · Cited by 245
Takada, M., Nishida, K., Kataoka‐Kato, A., Gondo, Y., Ishikawa, H., Suda, K., Kawai, M., Hoshi, R., Watanabe, O., Igarashi, T., et al. (2016) · Neurogastroenterology & Motility · doi:10.1111/nmo.12804 · Cited by 243
Gut microbiota–brain axis in depression: the role of neuroinflammation
Carlessi, A. S., Borba, L. A., Zugno, A. I., Quevedo, J., & Réus, G. Z. (2021) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/ejn.14631 · Cited by 243
Liu, R. T., Rowan-Nash, A. D., Sheehan, A. E., Walsh, R. F. L., Sanzari, C. M., Korry, B. J., & Belenky, P. A. (2020) · Brain Behavior and Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.bbi.2020.03.026 · Cited by 258
Disruption of the gut microbiome as a risk factor for microbial infections
Khosravi, A., & Mazmanian, S. K. (2013) · Current Opinion in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.mib.2013.03.009 · Cited by 243
Yarandi, S. S., & Srinivasan, S. (2014) · Neurogastroenterology & Motility · doi:10.1111/nmo.12330 · Cited by 236
Gut reactions: how the blood-brain barrier connects the microbiome and the brain
Logsdon, A. F., Erickson, M. A., Rhea, E. M., Salameh, T. S., & Banks, W. A. (2018) · Experimental Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1177/1535370217743766 · Cited by 235
Perez-Burgos, A., Wang, B., Mao, Y.-K., Mistry, B., Neufeld, K.-A. M., Bienenstock, J., & Kunze, W. (2013) · American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology · doi:10.1152/ajpgi.00128.2012 · Cited by 235
“The vagus nerve is an important afferent signaling pathway between the gastrointestinal tract and the brain (24, 47).”
BackgroundChen, D., Yang, X., Yang, J., Lai, G., Yong, T., Tang, X., Shuai, O., Zhou, G., Xie, Y., & Wu, Q. (2017) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2017.00403 · Cited by 227
“The hypothesis that the microbiota-gut-brain axis (Rhee et al., 2009) plays a critical role in health and disease, including neuropsychiatric disorders (Liu et al., 2017), is rapidly progressing.”
Gut Microbiota and Their Neuroinflammatory Implications in Alzheimer’s Disease
Giau, V. V., Wu, S., Jamerlan, A., An, S. S. A., Kim, S., & Hulme, J. (2018) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu10111765 · Cited by 239
Impact of gut microbiota on diabetes mellitus
Blandino, G., Inturri, R., Lazzara, F., Rosa, M. D., & Malaguarnera, L. (2016) · Diabetes & Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.diabet.2016.04.004 · Cited by 235
“Diabetes Metab (2016), he effect of incretin is impaired in T2D patients with autonomic europathy compared with those without such neuropathy [103].”
BackgroundMicrobiome disturbances and autism spectrum disorders
Rosenfeld, C. S. (2015) · Drug Metabolism and Disposition · doi:10.1124/dmd.115.063826 · Cited by 229
“With mounting evidence indicating that the gut microbiota populations may underpin some neurobehavioral disorders, this term has been since broadened to the gut-microbiome (microbiota)-brain axis (Collins and Bercik, 2009; Rhee et al., 2009; Cryan and Dinan, 2012).”
BackgroundCerebral low-molecular metabolites influenced by intestinal microbiota: a pilot study
Matsumoto, M., Kibe, R., Ooga, T., Aiba, Y., Sawaki, E., Koga, Y., & Benno, Y. (2013) · Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnsys.2013.00009 · Cited by 227
“The results of these studies suggest that intestinal microbiota have a great impact on gut-brain communication, which led to the coining of the term “microbiota-gut-brain axis” (MGB axis) (Rhee et al., 2009; Cryan and Dinan, 2012).”
InfluentialThe Potential Role of Gut Microbiota in Alzheimer’s Disease: From Diagnosis to Treatment
Varesi, A., Pierella, E., Romeo, M., Piccini, G. B., Alfano, C., Bjørklund, G., Oppong, A., Ricevuti, G., Esposito, C., Chirumbolo, S., et al. (2022) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu14030668 · Cited by 225
Martinez, J. E., Kahana, D. D., Ghuman, S., Wilson, H. P., Wilson, J. B., Kim, S. C. J., Lagishetty, V., Jacobs, J. P., Sinha‐Hikim, A. P., & Friedman, T. C. (2021) · Frontiers in Endocrinology · doi:10.3389/fendo.2021.667066 · Cited by 243
“The perturbation of these systems through external factors, such as diet or antimicrobial use, leads to alterations within stress-response mechanisms, behavior, and neurologic health (88, 89).”
BackgroundSavignac, H. M., Couch, Y., Stratford, M., Bannerman, D. M., Tzortzis, G., Anthony, D. C., & Burnet, P. W. J. (2016) · Brain, Behavior, and Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.bbi.2015.10.007 · Cited by 223
“…the intestinal microbiota and neuronal function in central nervous system has been convincingly established in recent years, which appears to stem notably from alterations in the host immune response (Rhee et al., 2009; Cryan and Dinan, 2012; Burnet and Cowen, 2013; Forsythe and Kunze, 2013).”
Ojima, M., Motooka, D., Shimizu, K., Gotoh, K., Shintani, A., Yoshiya, K., Nakamura, S., Ogura, H., Iida, T., & Shimazu, T. (2015) · Digestive Diseases and Sciences · doi:10.1007/s10620-015-4011-3 · Cited by 220
“The use of antibiotics [16], vasoactive agents, agents to neutralize gastric secretions, sedatives or analgesic agents that impair intestinal motility [17], and diet Fig.”
BackgroundThe Gut-Brain Axis, BDNF, NMDA and CNS Disorders
Maqsood, R., & Stone, T. W. (2016) · Neurochemical Research · doi:10.1007/s11064-016-2039-1 · Cited by 231
“Recent analysis indicates a bidirectional route of communication between the GI tract and the CNS, termed the ‘gutbrain axis’ [1] which may have profound effects on CNS development and on aspects of behaviour relevant to normal and pathological cognitive function.”
Liu, J., Wang, F., Liu, S., Du, J., Hu, X., Xiong, J., Fang, R., Chen, W., & Sun, J. (2017) · Journal of the Neurological Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jns.2017.08.3235 · Cited by 218
Bosi, A., Banfi, D., Bistoletti, M., Giaroni, C., & Baj, A. (2020) · International Journal of Tryptophan Research · doi:10.1177/1178646920928984 · Cited by 221
Clarke, G. A., Cryan, J. F., Dinan, T. G., & Quigley, E. M. M. (2012) · Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2036.2011.04965.x · Cited by 221
“the modulation of gastrointestinal functions (including motility, secretion, blood flow, intestinal permeability, mucosal immunity and visceral sensations) at a critical terminus of the brain-gut axis.(23)”
BackgroundWinek, K., Engel, O., Bäcker‐Koduah, P., Heimesaat, M. M., Fischer, A., Bereswill, S., Dames, C., Kershaw, O., Gruber, A. D., Curato, C., et al. (2016) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/strokeaha.115.011800 · Cited by 220
“Stroke modulates the activity of the autonomic nervous system, which contributes to immunodepression, but also affects gut motility and permeability.(19,20) Further, because of their increased susceptibility to infection, many stroke patients are treated with potent combinations of antibiotics, with possibly drastic c…”
BackgroundGut Microbiota: The Conductor in the Orchestra of Immune–Neuroendocrine Communication
El Aidy, S., Dinan, T. G., & Cryan, J. F. (2015) · Clinical Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.clinthera.2015.03.002 · Cited by 215
“The brain can influence the commensals directly via the receptor-mediated signaling and signaling molecules released in the gut lumen from immune cells or epithelial cells (in particular, enteroendocrine cells) or indirectly via changes in the intestinal motility and secretion.(58) Similarly, the enteric bacteria have…”
BackgroundSimon, E., Călinoiu, L. F., Mitrea, L., & Vodnar, D. C. (2021) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu13062112 · Cited by 235
Santocchi, E., Guiducci, L., Fulceri, F., Billeci, L., Buzzigoli, E., Apicella, F., Calderoni, S., Grossi, E., Morales, M. A., & Muratori, F. (2016) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-016-0887-5 · Cited by 213
Stress and visceral pain: From animal models to clinical therapies
Larauche, M. H., Mulak, A., & Taché, Y. (2011) · Experimental Neurology · doi:10.1016/j.expneurol.2011.04.020 · Cited by 219
Regulation of gut luminal serotonin by commensal microbiota in mice
Hata, T., Asano, Y., Yoshihara, K., Kimura-Todani, T., Miyata, N., Zhang, X.-T., Takakura, S., Aiba, Y., Koga, Y., & Sudo, N. (2017) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0180745 · Cited by 211
Mind-altering with the gut: Modulation of the gut-brain axis with probiotics
Kim, N., Yun, M., Oh, Y. J., & Choi, H.-J. (2018) · Journal of Microbiology · doi:10.1007/s12275-018-8032-4 · Cited by 210
“In addition, the nervous system plays an important role in the regulation of gut functions, such as gastrointestinal mobility, as well as secretion of acid, bicarbonate, and mucus, all of which are prominent in the maintenance of the mucous layer and biofilm (Rhee et al., 2009).”
BackgroundGut Dysbiosis in Animals Due to Environmental Chemical Exposures
Rosenfeld, C. S. (2017) · Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fcimb.2017.00396 · Cited by 217
“The chemical-induced destruction of the gut flora may open up a Pandora’s box leading to disruptions in several host systems, including the central nervous system (CNS) through the gut-microbiome-brain axis (Collins and Bercik, 2009; Rhee et al., 2009; Cryan and Dinan, 2012).”
BackgroundGioia, D. D., Aloisio, I., Mazzola, G., & Biavati, B. (2013) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s00253-013-5405-9 · Cited by 215
“This is what has been defined as " the gut–brain axis " (Rhee et al. 2009).”
BackgroundMicrobiota-gut-brain signalling in Parkinson's disease: Implications for non-motor symptoms
Felice, V. D., Quigley, E. M., Sullivan, A. M., O'Keeffe, G. W., & O'Mahony, S. M. (2016) · Parkinsonism & Related Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.parkreldis.2016.03.012 · Cited by 205
Fang, X., Wang, X., Yang, S., Meng, F., Wang, X., Wei, H., & Chen, T. (2016) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2016.01479 · Cited by 211
“…brain, may affect brain activity through the gut-microbiota–brain axis under both physiological and pathological conditions (Mayer et al., 2015; Sampson and Mazmanian, 2015), and accumulating evidence suggests that microbiota changes in the gastrointestinal tract of individuals possessed…”
BackgroundGhoshal, U. C., Shukla, R., & Ghoshal, U. (2017) · Gut and Liver · doi:10.5009/gnl16126 · Cited by 218
The probiotic Bifidobacterium infantis 35624 displays visceral antinociceptive effects in the rat
McKernan, D. P., Fitzgerald, P., Dinan, T. G., & Cryan, J. F. (2010) · Neurogastroenterology & Motility · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2982.2010.01520.x · Cited by 205
The Gut-Brain Axis in Parkinson’s Disease: Possibilities for Food-Based Therapies
Perez-Pardo, P., Kliest, T., Dodiya, H. B., Broersen, L. M., Garssen, J., Keshavarzian, A., & Kraneveld, A. D. (2017) · European Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.ejphar.2017.05.042 · Cited by 203
“It has been also lately recognized that the gut-brain interactions might be essentially influenced by the gut microbiota (Borre et al., 2014; Grenham et al., 2011; Rhee et al., 2009).”
BackgroundDevelopment of the Pediatric Gut Microbiome: Impact on Health and Disease
Ihekweazu, F. D., & Versalovic, J. A. (2018) · The American Journal of the Medical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.amjms.2018.08.005 · Cited by 205
“These effects on the microbiota can be indirect, through changes in motility and secretion, or direct, through signaling molecules released into the gastrointestinal tract via enterochromaffin cells, neurons, and immune cells.(64) The autonomic nervous system affects motility as well as mucus secretion into the gut lu…”
The gut, its microbiome, and the brain: connections and communications
Gershon, M. D., & Margolis, K. G. (2021) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci143768 · Cited by 219
The antipsychotic olanzapine interacts with the gut microbiome to cause weight gain in mouse
Morgan, A. P., Crowley, J. J., Nonneman, R. J., Quackenbush, C. R., Miller, C. N., Ryan, A. K., Bogue, M. A., Paredes, S. H., Yourstone, S., Carroll, I. M., et al. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0115225 · Cited by 197
“Complex bidirectional interactions occur between the brain, endocrine system, enteric nervous system, gut epithelium and microbiota in both rodents and humans [57], and olanzapine may perturb this ‘‘brain-gut-enteric microbiota’’ axis.”
BackgroundSantocchi, E., Guiducci, L., Prosperi, M., Calderoni, S., Gaggini, M., Apicella, F., Tancredi, R., Billeci, L., Mastromarino, P., Grossi, E., et al. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2020.550593 · Cited by 198
When Rhythms Meet the Blues: Circadian Interactions with the Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis
Teichman, E. M., O’Riordan, K. J., Gahan, C. G. M., Dinan, T. G., & Cryan, J. F. (2020) · Cell Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2020.02.008 · Cited by 199
Gastrointestinal function development and microbiota
Mauro, A. D., Neu, J., Riezzo, G., Raimondi, F., Martinelli, D., Francavilla, R., & Indrio, F. (2013) · The Italian Journal of Pediatrics/Italian journal of pediatrics · doi:10.1186/1824-7288-39-15 · Cited by 204
Parkinson’s disease and gut microbiota: from clinical to mechanistic and therapeutic studies
Zhang, X., Tang, B., & Guo, J. (2023) · Translational Neurodegeneration · doi:10.1186/s40035-023-00392-8 · Cited by 212
“The term “microbiota–gut–brain” was coined to characterize this complex mechanism [77].”
BackgroundSteroids, stress and the gut microbiome-brain axis
Tetel, M. J., de Vries, G. J., Melcangi, R. C., Panzica, G., & O'Mahony, S. M. (2018) · Journal of Neuroendocrinology · doi:10.1111/jne.12548 · Cited by 187
Zeng, X., Gao, X., Peng, Y., Wu, Q., Zhu, J., Tan, C., Xia, G., You, C., Xu, R., Pan, S., et al. (2019) · Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fcimb.2019.00004 · Cited by 194
Effects of polyethylene microplastics on the microbiome and metabolism in larval zebrafish
Zhao, Y., Qin, Z., Huang, Z., Bao, Z., Luo, T., & Jin, Y. (2021) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117039 · Cited by 185
Wasilewski, A., Zielińska, M., Storr, M., & Fichna, J. (2015) · Inflammatory Bowel Diseases · doi:10.1097/mib.0000000000000364 · Cited by 195
Julio‐Pieper, M., Flor, P. J., Dinan, T. G., & Cryan, J. F. (2011) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1124/pr.110.004036 · Cited by 184
“Furthermore, the existence of multiple nodes of communication between the brain and gut is supported by increasing evidence from germ-free animals, probiotic and antibiotic administration, and microflora transplantation studies, which suggest that the enteric microbiota can directly influence brain-gut axis function (…”
BackgroundInflammatory cytokine-associated depression
Lotrich, F. E. (2015) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2014.06.032 · Cited by 183
Gastrointestinal hormones and the dialogue between gut and brain
Dockray, G. J. (2014) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2014.270850 · Cited by 189
“The Journal of Physiology C© 2014 The Physiological Society gut–brain signalling with relevance to brain development, stress responses, pain and behaviour (Sudo et al. 2004; Rousseaux et al. 2007; Rhee et al. 2009; Bravo et al. 2011; Diaz Heijtz et al. 2011).”
BackgroundPriming for Life: Early Life Nutrition and the Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis
Ratsika, A., Codagnone, M. G., O’Mahony, S. M., Stanton, C., & Cryan, J. F. (2021) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu13020423 · Cited by 194
“Although the gut-brain axis was initially a target for research on hunger, satiety and digestion [11,12] most recent studies have focused on cognition and behaviour; the impact of psychological stress on GI motility, permeability and secretion, as well as the effect of afferent neuronal fibre stimulation in the gut on…”
BackgroundCrosstalk at the mucosal border: importance of the gut microenvironment in IBS
Öhman, L., Törnblom, H., & Simrén, M. (2014) · Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1038/nrgastro.2014.200 · Cited by 185
Do bacteria shape our development? Crosstalk between intestinal microbiota and HPA axis
de Weerth, C. (2017) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.09.016 · Cited by 189
“…the gut microbiota and the brain, researchers have added the enteric microbiota to the well-recognized ‘gut-brain axis’, now often speaking of the ‘microbiota-gut-brain axis’ (Cryan and Dinan, 2012; Forsythe et al., 2012; 2016; Montiel-Castro et al., 2013; Petra et al., 2015; Rhee et al., 2009).”
Do polyphenols enter the brain and does it matter? Some theoretical and practical considerations
Schaffer, S., & Halliwell, B. (2012) · Genes & Nutrition · doi:10.1007/s12263-011-0255-5 · Cited by 178
“…of this bidirectional interaction are well established, for instance the effect of mucosal inflammation on pain reception, effects of gut microbiota on other CNS-regulated phenomena such as mood changes or anxious behaviour have only recently been described (Forsythe et al. 2010; Rhee et al. 2009).”
Cowan, C. S. M., Dinan, T. G., & Cryan, J. F. (2020) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/jcpp.13156 · Cited by 176
Genomics of schizophrenia: time to consider the gut microbiome?
Dinan, T. G., Borre, Y. E., & Cryan, J. F. (2014) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/mp.2014.93 · Cited by 177
Solas, M., Milagro, F. I., Ramírez, M. J., & Martínez, J. A. (2017) · Current Opinion in Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.coph.2017.10.005 · Cited by 177
“Apart from research into the role of the gut-brain axis on these functions, there has been recent emphasis on how these interactions affect mental health [34].”
BackgroundLee, K., Vuong, H. E., Nusbaum, D. J., Hsiao, E. Y., Evans, C. J., & Taylor, A. M. W. (2018) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/s41386-018-0211-9 · Cited by 172
Parkinson’s Disease and the Gastrointestinal Microbiome
Lubomski, M., Tan, A. H., Lim, S.-Y., Holmes, A. J., Davis, R. L., & Sue, C. M. (2020) · Journal of Neurology · doi:10.1007/s00415-019-09320-1 · Cited by 172
“Accordingly, this intricate network shares a crucial role in maintaining the vital physiological interplay between the gastrointestinal tract and the brain [37].”
BackgroundFrom Probiotics to Psychobiotics: Live Beneficial Bacteria Which Act on the Brain-Gut Axis
Bermúdez‐Humarán, L. G., Salinas, E., Ortíz, G. G., Ramírez-Jirano, L. J., Morales, J. A., & Bitzer-Quintero, O. K. (2019) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu11040890 · Cited by 184
“It has been demonstrated that bi-directional communication exists between the intestine and the brain and that it involves neurological, metabolic, hormonal and immunological signaling pathways; and that disturbance or alteration in these systems can result in altered behavior [83].”
BackgroundDuPont, H. L. (2014) · Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1111/apt.12728 · Cited by 171
Understanding the Gut–Brain Axis and Its Therapeutic Implications for Neurodegenerative Disorders
Zheng, Y., Bonfili, L., Wei, T., & Eleuteri, A. M. (2023) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu15214631 · Cited by 175
“Conversely, gut autonomic nerves can carry sensory information directly to the brain when stimulated by gut microbial metabolites (metabolites interacting with gut ANS synapses), including serotonin, γ -aminobutyric acid (GABA), catecholamines, and precursors of tryptophan [29].”
BackgroundGut microbiota interacts with brain microstructure and function
Fernandez-Real, J.-M., Serino, M., Blasco, G., Puig, J., Daunis-i-Estadella, J., Ricart, W., Burcelin, R., Fernández-Aranda, F., & Portero-Otin, M. (2015) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2015-3076 · Cited by 167
Bacterial Signaling to the Nervous System through Toxins and Metabolites
Yang, N. J., & Chiu, I. M. (2017) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2016.12.023 · Cited by 167
“Sensory neurons innervating the gut typically detect paracrine signals that are released by enteroendocrine cells in the epithelium in response to chemicals—including nutrients—in the lumen [119,120,116].”
BackgroundChen, L., Guo, Y., Hu, C., Lam, P. K. S., Lam, J. C. W., & Zhou, B. (2017) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2017.11.074 · Cited by 168
Kadosh, K. C., Muhardi, L., Parikh, P., Basso, M., Mohamed, H. J. J., Prawitasari, T., Samuel, F. O., Ma, G., & Geurts, J. M. W. (2021) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu13010199 · Cited by 206
Microbiome, HPA Axis and Production of Endocrine Hormones in the Gut
Sudo, N. (2014) · Advances in experimental medicine and biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-0897-4_8 · Cited by 167
“Since numerous kinds of bacteria and host cells are in close proximity in the gastrointestinal tract of mammals, interkingdom signaling via various kinds of luminal molecules is presumed to be performed continually in the gut lumen [19] and to participate in the regulation of various pathophysiological functions.”
The Impact of Gut Microbiota Disorders on the Blood–Brain Barrier
Wei, T., Zhu, H., Feng, Y., Guo, R., & Wan, D. (2020) · Infection and Drug Resistance · doi:10.2147/idr.s254403 · Cited by 171
Kandpal, M., Indari, O., Baral, B., Jakhmola, S., Tiwari, D., Bhandari, V., Pandey, R. K., Bala, K., Sonawane, A., & Jha, H. C. (2022) · Metabolites · doi:10.3390/metabo12111064 · Cited by 177
Impact of dietary fats on brain functions
Chianese, R., Coccurello, R., Viggiano, A., Scafuro, M., Fiore, M., Coppola, G., Operto, F. F., Fasano, S., Laye, S., Pierantoni, R., et al. (2018) · Current Neuropharmacology · doi:10.2174/1570159x15666171017102547 · Cited by 159
“Thus, the notion of “gut-brain axis” is now largely used to explain the close connection and the tight bidirectional communication between the gut and brain and the importance of their cross-talk for brain functions in health and disease [26-29].”
BackgroundMoloney, R. D., O’Mahony, S. M., Dinan, T. G., & Cryan, J. F. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2015.00015 · Cited by 171
“Thus, it is now acknowledged that the gut microbiota themselves are critical mediators of information along this bidirectional communication network (145, 207, 211, 213, 229, 230).”
BackgroundThe Influence of Gut Dysbiosis in the Pathogenesis and Management of Ischemic Stroke
Chidambaram, S. B., Rathipriya, A. G., Mahalakshmi, A. M., Sonali, S., Hediyal, T. A., Ray, B., Sunanda, T., Rungratanawanich, W., Kashyap, R. S., Qoronfleh, M. W., et al. (2022) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells11071239 · Cited by 168
“Increased translocation of bacteria and their toxic products into systemic circulation predisposes to a vast array of GI, metabolic, endotoxemia, cardiovascular, and neurological disorders [46,48,49].”
BackgroundAltered peripheral toll-like receptor responses in the irritable bowel syndrome
McKernan, D. P., Gaszner, G., Quigley, E. M. M., Cryan, J. F., & Dinan, T. G. (2011) · Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2036.2011.04624.x · Cited by 162
“The gut microbiota is known to have an influence on a number of physiological parameters including the immune system and may prime immune cells that enter the peripheral circulation.(37) This may impact on the TLR expression profile of immune cells and result in”
BackgroundFiebiger, U., Bereswill, S., & Heimesaat, M. M. (2016) · European Journal of Microbiology and Immunology · doi:10.1556/1886.2016.00036 · Cited by 165
Gutted! Unraveling the Role of the Microbiome in Major Depressive Disorder
Bastiaanssen, T. F. S., Cussotto, S., Claesson, M. J., Clarke, G., Dinan, T. G., & Cryan, J. F. (2020) · Harvard Review of Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/hrp.0000000000000243 · Cited by 159
Sun, J., Wang, F., Hu, X., Yang, C., Xu, H., Yao, Y., & Liu, J. (2018) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.jafc.8b02462 · Cited by 161
The fecal microbiome of ALS patients
Brenner, D., Hiergeist, A., Adis, C. I., Mayer, B., Gessner, A., Ludolph, A. C., & Weishaupt, J. H. (2017) · Neurobiology of Aging · doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2017.09.023 · Cited by 156
Nair, A. T., Ramachandran, V., Joghee, N. M., Shanish Antony, A., & Ramalingam, G. (2018) · Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility · doi:10.5056/jnm17105 · Cited by 164
“This network plays a major role and impacts both GI and brain function.(31,33) Further, dopamine synthesis in the brain is induced by dopamine producing enzymes whose synthesis or inhibition is controlled by gut microbiota via the microbiota-gut-brain axis.”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Rhee, S. H., Pothoulakis, C., & Mayer, E. A.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Corresponding author
- Mayer, Emeran A.
- Venue
- Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology
- Published
- 2009-05
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 306-314
- ISSN
- 1759-5045 (ISSN-L)
- 1759-5053
- PMC
- PMC3817714
- OpenAlex
- W2076087096
- Semantic Scholar
- 8d46dbee61595ddb88b690b9979d376a39c691fe
- Cited by
- 1,342
- References
- 87
- Citations by year
- 2026: 66 · 2025: 107 · 2024: 112 · 2023: 130 · 2022: 122 · 2021: 127 · 2020: 114 · 2019: 90 · 2018: 84 · 2017: 94 · 2016: 77 · 2015: 48 · 2014: 55 · 2013: 45 · 2012: 33
- FWCI
- 1.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P01DK033506, P01 DK-33506, R01 DK072471, R01 DK 48351, R01DK048351, R01-DK47343, P50DK064539, P-50DK64539, R01DK047343, R01DK060729)
- National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (R24AT002681)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
- Keywords
- gut-brain axis, gut microbiota, enteric microbiota, two-way communication, central nervous system, enterochromaffin cells, intestinal permeability, lamina propria, gastrointestinal motility, gastrointestinal secretion, functional bowel disorders, inflammatory bowel disease
- MeSH terms
- Brain, Humans, Intestines, Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Enteric Nervous System
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-09, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-09 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review