Cited by 155Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsMemory and Neural MechanismsPhysical Activity and Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 419 of the 429 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 3 of the 342 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

Aerobic Exercise as a Tool to Improve Hippocampal Plasticity and Function in Humans: Practical Implications for Mental Health Treatment

Open access
Kandola, Aaron, Hendrikse, Joshua, Lucassen, Paul J., Yücel, Murat·2016·Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

Abstract

Aerobic exercise (AE) has been widely praised for its potential benefits to cognition and overall brain and mental health. In particular, AE has a potent impact on promoting the function of the hippocampus and stimulating neuroplasticity. As the evidence-base rapidly builds, and given most of the supporting work can be readily translated from animal models to humans, the potential for AE to be applied as a therapeutic or adjunctive intervention for a range of human conditions appears ever more promising. Notably, many psychiatric and neurological disorders have been associated with hippocampal dysfunction, which may underlie the expression of certain symptoms common to these disorders, including (aspects of) cognitive dysfunction. Augmenting existing treatment approaches using AE based interventions may promote hippocampal function and alleviate cognitive deficits in various psychiatric disorders that currently remain untreated. Incorporating non-pharmacological interventions into clinical treatment may also have a number of other benefits to patient well being, such as limiting the risk of adverse side effects. This review incorporates both animal and human literature to comprehensively detail how AE is associated with cognitive enhancements and stimulates a cascade of neuroplastic mechanisms that support improvements in hippocampal functioning. Using the examples of schizophrenia and major depressive disorder, the utility and implementation of an AE intervention to the clinical domain will be proposed, aimed to reduce cognitive deficits in these, and related disorders.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This review synthesizes animal and human evidence that aerobic exercise (AE) promotes hippocampal neuroplasticity and hippocampus-dependent cognition, and proposes AE as an adjunctive intervention for cognitive deficits in schizophrenia and major depressive disorder (MDD). It argues AE may enhance hippocampal structure and function via neurogenesis, synaptic plasticity, vasculature, and neurotrophic factors, but calls for more RCTs and standardized protocols.

Key findings

  • AE is associated with improved hippocampus-dependent cognition in humans, including episodic, spatial, contextual memory, and pattern separation, while less hippocampus-dependent tasks such as attention, verbal memory, or item recognition may not show the same effects; animal work consistently shows AE improves spatial and contextual memory.
  • Human imaging studies associate higher aerobic fitness and AE interventions with larger hippocampal or temporal lobe volumes; correlations between AE-induced hippocampal growth and spatial/contextual memory range from r = 0.12 to r = 0.36, with specific RCT correlations of r = 0.28 for a computerized spatial memory task and r = 0.37 for a complex figure test of spatial object recognition. Some RCTs found no effect of AE on hippocampal volume.
  • Proposed mechanisms include adult hippocampal neurogenesis, long-term potentiation and synaptic plasticity, angiogenesis/increased cerebral blood flow, and upregulation of BDNF, VEGF, and IGF-1; one 3-month AE study attributed improvements in hippocampus-dependent task performance and hippocampal volume predominantly to greater cerebral blood flow, while another found a 2% decrease in hippocampal volume with no change in NAA, suggesting the decline was unlikely due to neuronal loss.
  • In clinical examples, schizophrenia and MDD are associated with reduced hippocampal volume and cognitive deficits; AE has been shown to reduce positive and negative symptoms in schizophrenia and affective symptoms in MDD, in some cases as effectively as antidepressants, and early studies show cognitive improvements, though some null findings exist. AE is proposed as a low-risk adjunct to pharmacotherapy, with 10–30% of MDD patients potentially not responding to antidepressants alone.

Methods

  • Narrative review incorporating both animal and human literature on AE, hippocampal plasticity, cognition, and clinical application; no systematic search or meta-analytic pooling is described.
  • Uses schizophrenia and MDD as example conditions to discuss the utility and implementation of AE interventions for cognitive deficits.
  • Main analysis is a qualitative synthesis of cross-sectional studies, RCTs, animal models, neuroimaging, peripheral biomarker, and pharmacological treatment studies; no primary data collection is reported.

Limitations

  • The paper states that more RCTs are needed to establish a causal relationship between AE and neural/cognitive outcomes; there is a lack of consensus on optimal exercise type, intensity, or length; motivation and adherence are major obstacles, with high dropout rates in psychiatric AE studies; and there is a distinct lack of systematic investigations in psychiatric populations.
  • The paper notes that human imaging techniques directly assess only macro-scale changes and cannot determine the functional significance of volume changes; animal models cannot fully model complex disorders like schizophrenia; and human biomarker findings are mixed.
  • Evident from the text: as a narrative review, it does not systematically search or quantitatively synthesize the evidence, and conclusions are constrained by heterogeneous AE protocols and limited or inconsistent studies.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00373

Cites

419 of 419 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

191 Not checked yet · 39 Own interpretation · 9 No basis given · 1 Partly supported · accuracy not yet measured

Verify all 339 references — free account

Show all 170 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 57
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 16
70 of 70
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Aerobic exercise has a low risk profile and is relatively easy to implement.

    “Given its general benefits to ones physical health, low risk profile and relative ease of implementation, AE represents a promising therapeutic target for a range of brain pathologies.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Most of the supporting work on aerobic exercise can be readily translated from animal models to humans.

    “As the evidence-base rapidly builds, and given most of the supporting work can be readily translated from animal models to humans, the potential for AE to be applied as a therapeutic or adjunctive intervention for a range of human conditions appears ever more promising.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Cognitive deficits in various psychiatric disorders currently remain untreated.

    “Augmenting existing treatment approaches using AE based interventions may promote hippocampal function and alleviate cognitive deficits in various psychiatric disorders that currently remain untreated.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Aerobic exercise has general benefits to physical health.

    “Given its general benefits to ones physical health, low risk profile and relative ease of implementation, AE represents a promising therapeutic target for a range of brain pathologies.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Low mean diffusivity is indicative of increased gray-matter tissue density.

    “based on the assumption that a low mean diffusivity is indicative of an increased gray-matter tissue density (Kleemeyer et al., 2015).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    NAA is a metabolite indicative of neuronal integrity.

    “N-acetylaspartate (NAA) is a metabolite indicative of neuronal integrity”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Comparatively little attention has been afforded to the potential application of AE in treating psychiatric disorders that have a similarly deleterious impact on the hippocampus and are associated with severe cognitive deficits.

    “Comparatively little attention has been afforded to the potential application of AE in treating psychiatric disorders that have a similarly deleterious impact on the hippocampus and are associated with severe cognitive deficits.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Cognitive dysfunctions in psychiatric disorders remain largely untreated.

    “targeting cognitive dysfunctions that remain largely untreated.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Hippocampal damage is a significant factor underlying the symptomatology of disorders that AE may treat.

    “disorders in which hippocampal damage is a significant factor that underlies its symptomatology.”
9 of 9

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

1 of 1

Citations

Cites

Show all 429 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. CMR International, 2015, CMR International 2015 Pharmaceutical R&D Factbook.
  2. Goldberg, 2002, Neurocognitive functioning in patients with schizophrenia: an overview, Neuropsychopharmacology: The Fifth Generation of Progress
  3. Moser, 1998, Functional differentiation in the hippocampus., Hippocampus, 8, 608, 10.1002/(sici)1098-1063(1998)8:6608::aid-hipo33.0.co;2-7 · DOI
  4. Sexton, 2015a, Physical activity and anterior hippocampal volume in older adults., Proc. Physiol. Soc., 33

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kandola, A., Hendrikse, J., Lucassen, P. J., & Yücel, M.
Affiliations
  • Monash University (AU)
  • University of Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
  • Kandola, Aaron
  • Yücel, Murat
Venue
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Published
2016-07-29
Volume
10
Pages
373-373
ISSN
1662-5161 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2498750904
Cited by
155
References
429
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 2
FWCI
2.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Human Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Monash University Research Portal (Monash University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
National Health and Medical Research Council (APP1021973)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Physical Activity and Health
Keywords
aerobic exercise, hippocampus, neuroplasticity, cognitive enhancement, psychotherapy, schizophrenia, major depressive disorder, cognitive impairment, non-pharmacological treatment, adjunctive therapy, hippocampal dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review