Cited by 108Medicinal Plants and NeuroprotectionAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsPhytochemicals and Medicinal Plants

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 242 of the 277 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 2 of the 242 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

Indian Medicinal Herbs and Formulations for Alzheimer’s Disease, from Traditional Knowledge to Scientific Assessment

Open access

Abstract

Cognitive impairment, associated with ageing, stress, hypertension and various neurodegenerative disorders including Parkinson’s disease and epilepsy, is a major health issue. The present review focuses on Alzheimer’s disease (AD), since it is the most important cause of cognitive impairment. It is characterized by progressive memory loss, language deficits, depression, agitation, mood disturbances and psychosis. Although the hallmarks of AD are cholinergic dysfunction, β-amyloid plaques and neurofibrillary tangle formation, it is also associated with derangement of other neurotransmitters, elevated levels of advanced glycation end products, oxidative damage, neuroinflammation, genetic and environmental factors. On one hand, this complex etiopathology makes a response to commonly used drugs such as donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine and memantine less predictable and often unsatisfactory. On the other hand, it supports the use of herbal medicines due to their nonspecific antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activity and specific cholinesterase inhibitory activity. The popularity of herbal medicines is also increasing due to their perceived effectiveness, safety and affordability. In the present article, the experimental and clinical evidence have been reviewed for various Indian herbal medicines such as Centella asiatica, Bacopa monnieri, Curcuma longa, Clitoria ternatea, Withania somnifera, Celastrus paniculatus, Evolvulus alsinoides, Desmodium gangeticum, Eclipta alba, Moringa oleifera and Convolvulus pluricaulis, which have shown potential in cognitive impairment. Some commonly available herbal formulations for memory impairment in India have also been reviewed.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This narrative review summarizes experimental and clinical evidence for Indian medicinal herbs and polyherbal formulations in Alzheimer’s disease and cognitive impairment. It concludes that many herbs show preclinical promise via antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, cholinergic, and anti-amyloid mechanisms, but clinical validation, standardization, and safety data remain limited for most.

Key findings

  • The review covers 11 Indian herbs—*Centella asiatica*, *Bacopa monnieri*, *Curcuma longa*, *Clitoria ternatea*, *Withania somnifera*, *Celastrus paniculatus*, *Evolvulus alsinoides*, *Desmodium gangeticum*, *Eclipta alba*, *Moringa oleifera*, and *Convolvulus pluricaulis*—plus formulations including Mentat, Trasina, Memorin, Bramhi Ghrita, and Abana. Herbal medicines are proposed to act through nonspecific antioxidant/anti-inflammatory effects and specific actions on AChE, β-amyloid fibril formation, and tau aggregation.
  • Clinical evidence cited includes *Centella asiatica* extract 250–750 mg once daily for 2 months in healthy volunteers, where the high dose enhanced working memory and improved self-rated mood; *Bacopa monnieri* 300 mg daily for 12 weeks improved verbal learning, memory consolidation, and speed of early information processing in healthy volunteers (n = 46), while 125 mg twice daily for 12 weeks improved mental control, logical memory, and paired associate learning in subjects above 55 years with memory impairment; and *Withania somnifera* root extract 300 mg twice daily for 8 weeks improved immediate and general memory, executive function, attention, and information processing speed in adults with mild cognitive impairment.
  • Preclinical findings include curcumin lowering soluble Aβ, insoluble amyloid, and plaque burden by nearly 40% in a transgenic mouse study, inhibiting Aβ aggregation/disaggregation at IC50 = 0.81–1 μM, and showing no toxicity up to 8000 mg/day for 3 months in a phase I trial with 25 healthy subjects. *Centella asiatica* at 2.5 mg/kg for 8 months decreased amyloid beta 1–40 and 1–42 in the hippocampus of PSAPP mice, and 5.0 mg/kg reduced Congo red-stained fibrillar amyloid plaques.
  • Toxicity data reported include *Centella asiatica* extract up to 10 g/kg with no acute toxicity signs, no significant toxicity at 10–1000 mg/kg in subacute studies, and no significant toxicity up to 1200 mg/kg/day for six months in Wistar rats, but one study found 1000 mg/kg/day dried *C. asiatica* for 30 days caused hepatotoxicity in albino rats. *Bacopa* oral LD50 was 5 g/kg for aqueous extract and 17 g/kg for alcoholic extract in rats.

Methods

  • This is a narrative review. Database searches were conducted on PUBMED and GOOGLE SCHOLAR using keywords: dementia, herbal products/drugs/medicine, Alzheimer’s disease, and complementary and alternative medicines.
  • Inclusion criteria were preclinical studies (in-vitro and in-vivo), clinical studies, and herbal medicines identified with their regional or Hindi name. Exclusion criteria were herbal drugs of non-Indian origin, articles in languages other than English, and full text not available.
  • The review summarizes plant descriptions, chemical constituents, pharmacological activities, preclinical studies, clinical evidence, and toxicity for selected herbs, followed by sections on Indian herbal formulations, regulatory status, and issues/challenges with herbal drugs.

Limitations

  • The paper states that clinical evidence is limited or absent for several herbs: *C. asiatica* use for AD “remains to be evaluated”; curcumin lacks clinical data on efficacy in AD; *C. paniculatus* has not undergone clinical trials for safety and efficacy and animal toxicology data are lacking; *E. alsinoides* has not been studied systematically for clinical efficacy and toxicological effects; *D. gangeticum* has little clinical evidence and requires toxicity studies; *E. alba* needs clinical evaluation; *M. oleifera* mechanism, composition, and extract differences need to be established before clinical trials; and *C. pluricaulis* has not been evaluated clinically.
  • The paper also states broader challenges: quality control of herbal drugs, herb–drug interactions, adulteration, labeling, and pharmacovigilance. It calls standardization of plant extracts “an urgent need,” says phytoconstituents should be isolated, identified, and systematically tested, and recommends multicenter clinical trials.
  • Evident from the text: as a narrative review, it does not report a systematic quality assessment, risk-of-bias appraisal, or meta-analysis; findings rely heavily on preclinical models and heterogeneous extracts, doses, and formulations, which limits direct comparability and clinical generalizability.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/brainsci10120964

Cites

242 of 242 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Figures

Figure 1 General pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease (APP, amyloid precursor protein).
Figure 1 General pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease (APP, amyloid precursor protein).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Multipronged approach of herbal medicines in Alzheimer’s disease.
Figure 2 Multipronged approach of herbal medicines in Alzheimer’s disease.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

191 Not checked yet · 17 Own interpretation · 5 No basis given · 1 Supported · 1 Supported so far

Verify all 240 references — free account

Show all 133 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 71
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 13
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 2
82 of 82
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Findings from animal models of Alzheimer's disease and cognitive impairment predict clinical efficacy in human Alzheimer's disease patients.

    “Various CNS active Indian herbal medicines like Withania somnifera, Centella asiatica, Celastrus paniculatus and Bacopa monnieri have shown cognitive improvement in experimental models of AD when given as prophylactic treatment [43,44,45,46,47,48].”
    “Thus, this multitarget compound is a promising therapeutic agent for AD and associated cognitive decline.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The pathological mechanisms targeted by herbal medicines in preclinical models correspond to those in human Alzheimer's disease.

    “Herbal medicines, supported by a wealth of traditional knowledge, may serve the purpose as they can target AD pathophysiology at multiple sites, both at cellular and molecular levels.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Animal models of cognitive impairment (e.g., scopolamine, ICV-STZ, ibotenic acid) are predictive of human AD and cognitive impairment.

    “These observations suggest that C. ternatea extract exerts its beneficial effect by preventing the progression of cognitive deterioration in AD.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Traditional Ayurvedic use of these herbs for memory enhancement provides a valid rationale for investigating them in AD.

    “It is traditionally used as a memory enhancer in children and elderly and for neurological disorders like epilepsy [184].”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    In vitro findings (e.g., AChE inhibition, antioxidant activity) translate to in vivo cognitive benefits.

    “The methanol and water extract of E. alsinoides documented to exhibit acetylcholinesterase activity, supporting its potential in reverting neuronal dysfunctions and thus in management of AD [193].”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Extraction technique and processing step may cause variation in the concentration of active constituents in herbal medicines.

    “Extraction technique and processing step may cause variation in the concentration of active constituents, which necessitates quality control of herbal medicines.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Herbal drugs contain numerous unidentified constituents, which make it difficult to assess the nature of interactions.

    “Herbal drugs contain numerous unidentified constituents, which make it difficult to assess the nature of interactions.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Heterogeneity in doses and frequency of use obstructs precise assessment of drug interactions.

    “Heterogeneity in doses and frequency of use also obstruct precise assessment of drug interactions.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Ginkgo biloba when given with donepezil causes an increased effect in Alzheimer's disease due to additive cholinergic activity.

    “Ginkgo biloba when given with donepezil cause an increased effect in AD due to additive cholinergic activity.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Ginkgo biloba when given with phenytoin causes breakthrough seizures due to induction of CYP2C19.

    “However, when it was given with phenytoin, it causes breakthrough seizures due to the induction of CYP2C19.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    In the elderly population, the absorption, metabolism and elimination of drugs are already impaired.

    “In the elderly population, the absorption, metabolism and elimination of drugs are already impaired.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Herbal drugs are many times substituted or adulterated with other inferior products with morphological resemblance of the authentic herb.

    “Herbal drugs are many times substituted or adulterated with other inferior products with morphological resemblance of authentic herb.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    This type of adulteration is more common for herbs with volatile components.

    “This type of adulteration is more common for herbs with volatile components.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The adulterants may not have a therapeutic benefit or may even cause adverse effects.

    “The adulterants may not have a therapeutic benefit or may even cause adverse effects.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Proper labeling can reduce the risk of inappropriate use and adverse effects.

    “Proper labeling can reduce the risk of inappropriate use and adverse effects.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Traditional systems of medicine suffer from a lack of or inadequate regulatory guidelines.

    “traditional systems of medicine suffer from a lack of or inadequate regulatory guidelines.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Herbal medicines are widely perceived to be safe due to their natural origins.

    “herbal medicines are widely perceived to be safe due to their natural origins.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Patients with Alzheimer's disease constitute a special subgroup due to their vulnerability and their inability to communicate adverse events in later stages of the disease.

    “Patients with Alzheimer’s disease constitute a special subgroup due to their vulnerability and their inability to communicate adverse events, in later stages of the disease.”
18 of 18

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

3 of 3

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Items 201–242 of 242

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Kumar, A., Sidhu, J., Goyal, A., Goyal, A., and Tsao, J.W. (2020, November 25). Alzheimer Disease, StatPearls [Internet], Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK499922/.
  2. Cracker, L.E., and Simon, J.E. (1998). Herbs, Spices and Medicinal Plants, Oryx Press.
  3. Chivapat, 2004, Toxicity study of Centella asiatica (L) urban, J. Thai Trad Alt Med., 2, 3
  4. Srinath, 2014, Memory enhancing medicinal herbs, J. Pharm. Sci. Res., 6, 331
  5. Sharma, 1987, Efficacy of Bacopa monnieri in revitalizing intellectual functions in children, J. Res. Educ. Indian Med., 1, 12
  6. Negi, 2000, Clinical evaluation of memory enhancing properties of Memory Plus in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, Indian J. Psychiatry., 42, 42
  7. Qadri, 2001, Acute toxicological evaluation of the aqueous extract of Eclipta alba Hassk, Pak. J. Sci. Ind. Res., 44, 38
  8. Bone, K. (1996). Clinical Applications of Ayurvedic and Chinese Herbs. Monographs for the Western Herbal Practitioner, Phytotherapy Press.
  9. Ramaiah, 2018, Traditional, Ethnomedical, and Pharmacological uses of Celastrus paniculatus, Asian J. Pharm., 12, S1119
  10. Lekha, 2010, Cognitive enhancement and Neuroprotective effect of Celastrus paniculatus Willd. seed oil (Jyothismati oil) on male Wistar rats, J. Pharma. Sci. Tech., 2, 130
  11. Karanth, 1980, Effect of Celastrus paniculatus on learning process, Arogya, 6, 137
  12. Rajani, 2007, Prasad KVSRG. Effect of Eclipta alba Linn on learning and memory in rats, Indian J. Pharm. Educ. Res., 41, 369
  13. Kirtikar, K.R., and Basu, B.D. (1975). Indian Medicinal Plants, Jayyed Press. [2nd ed.].
  14. Singh, 1996, Ethnomedicinal uses of plants of Gonda district forests of Uttar Pradesh, India, Fitoterapia., 2, 129
  15. Dubey, 1994, Combined effect of Brahmi (Bacopa monniera) and Shankhpushpi (Convolvulus pluricaulis) on cognitive functions, Pharmacopsychoecol, 3, 249
  16. Sharma, 2009, Anxiolytic effect of Convolvulus pluricaulis petals on elevated plus maze model of anxiety in mice, J. Herb. Med. Toxicol., 1, 41
  17. Chaturvedi, 1997, Hypolipidaemic effect of Convolvulus microphyllus on cholesterol fed gerbils, J. Phytol. Res., 2, 153
  18. Bhattacharya, 1995, Effect of Mentat, a Herbal Formulation, on Experimental Models of Alzheimer’s Disease and Central Cholinergic Markers in Rats, Fitoterapia, 3, 216
  19. Agarwal, 1991, Effect of Mentat on memory, anxiety scores and neuroticism index in normal subjectsin three age groups, Probe, 3, 257
  20. Koti, 1991, Effect of Mentat on school students performance, Probe, 3, 250

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 108

Metadata

Authors
Mehla, J., Gupta, P., Pahuja, M., Diwan, D., & Diksha, D.
Affiliations
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • All India Institute of Medical Sciences (IN)
  • Government of India (IN)
Corresponding author
  • Mehla, Jogender
  • Gupta, Pooja
Venue
Brain Sciences
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2020-12-10
Volume
10
Issue
12
Pages
964
ISSN
2076-3425 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3113093720
Cited by
108
References
277
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 13
FWCI
2.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Brain Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons@Becker (Washington University School of Medicine) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Medicinal Plants and Neuroprotection
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Phytochemicals and Medicinal Plants
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, herbal formula, cognitive impairment, cholinesterase inhibition, neuroinflammation, oxidative stress, Centella asiatica, Bacopa monnieri, turmeric, Clitoria ternatea, Withania somnifera, Celastrus paniculatus, Evolvulus alsinoides, Desmodium gangeticum, Eclipta prostrata, Moringa oleifera, Convolvulus pluricaulis, memory impairment, traditional knowledge

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review