Cited by 66Telomeres, Telomerase, and SenescenceGenetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model OrganismsPluripotent Stem Cells Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 168 of the 174 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 141 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Cell Immortality: In Vitro Effective Techniques to Achieve and Investigate Its Applications and Challenges

Open access

Abstract

Cells are very important to researchers due to their use in various biological studies in in vitro and in vivo settings. This importance stems from the short lifespan of most cells under laboratory conditions, which can pose significant challenges, such as the difficulties associated with extraction from the source tissue, ethical concerns about separating cells from human or animal models, limited cell passage ability, and variation in results due to differences in the source of the obtained cells, among other issues. In general, cells in laboratory conditions can divide into a limited number, known as the Hayflick limit, due to telomere erosion at the end of each cellular cycle. Given this problem, researchers require cell lines that do not enter the senescence phase after a limited number of divisions. This can allow for more stable studies over time, prevent the laborious work associated with cell separation and repeated cultivation, and save time and money in research projects. The aim of this review is to summarize the function and effect of immortalization techniques, various methods, their advantages and disadvantages, and ultimately the application of immortalization and cell line production in various research fields.

Overview

CoChat Summary

Written by AI from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This review summarizes in vitro techniques for cell immortalization, including viral oncoproteins, oncogene overexpression, hTERT, chemical/radiation exposure, and CRISPR/Cas9, and discusses applications and challenges. It concludes that immortalized cell lines are valuable but carry risks such as genomic instability, phenotypic drift, and contamination.

Key findings

  • Cells normally face the Hayflick limit after approximately 60 population doublings due to telomere shortening; immortalized lines bypass senescence, with HeLa being the first successful human cell immortalization and having active telomerase.
  • Major immortalization methods include viral oncoproteins (SV40 large/small T antigen, HPV E6/E7, HTLV Tax1/Tax2, adenovirus 12S E1A, EBV), overexpression of genes such as HOX/TLX1, Lhx2, c-Myc, CDK4, and hTERT, cancer-associated fibroblasts, combined methods, chemical/radiation exposure, and CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing.
  • hTERT overexpression is presented as a safer approach because hTERT is not an oncogene; hTERT-immortalized cells can retain normal cell cycle control, active p53 and pRb checkpoints, contact inhibition, growth factor dependence, and stable karyotypes.
  • Applications include vaccine development, drug testing, antibody production, gene function studies, artificial tissues, therapeutic proteins, regenerative medicine, and cultured meat; challenges include cell line misidentification, with one 2011 study finding 37 of 122 head and neck cancer cell lines (30%) misidentified and analyses suggesting at least 15% of cell lines are misidentified or contaminated.

Methods

  • Design: narrative review of in vitro cell immortalization techniques, their advantages and disadvantages, and applications.
  • Data or sample: no experimental sample or primary data are reported; the paper synthesizes published literature and cited studies.
  • Main analysis: descriptive/thematic synthesis of immortalization mechanisms, including viral oncoproteins, gene overexpression, cancer cells, combined methods, chemical/radiation exposure, and CRISPR/Cas9.

Limitations

  • The paper states that cell lines may not fully mirror primary cells because genetic manipulation can alter phenotype, inherent functions, and responses to stimuli; repeated cultivation can cause genetic drift and heterogeneity, and contamination by other cell lines or mycoplasma can persist undetected and alter gene expression and cellular behavior.
  • The paper states that viral oncoprotein methods inactivate p53 and Rb, can lead to genomic instability, polyploidy, and altered chromosome numbers, and are not considered safe or risk-free; p53 loss is observed in about half of human malignant cancers.
  • Evident from the text: as a narrative review, no systematic search strategy, inclusion/exclusion criteria, or quantitative synthesis is described, and no primary experimental validation is reported.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/life14030417

Cites

168 of 168 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Figures

Figure 1 The Hayflick limit. Naturally, with each cell division, the telomeres at the ends of chromosomes become shorter, a phenomenon known as the Hayflick limit. The final stage is also known as cellular aging.
Figure 1 The Hayflick limit. Naturally, with each cell division, the telomeres at the ends of chromosomes become shorter, a phenomenon known as the Hayflick limit. The final stage is also known as cellular aging.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 A look at some of the applications of immortalized cells in different types of research.
Figure 2 A look at some of the applications of immortalized cells in different types of research.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 Telomerase components and TERT structure. Telomerase is composed of three main components—hTERT, hTERC, and DKC1. The hTERC is associated with DKC1 and small nucleolar RNPs, NOP10, NHP2, and GAR1. The sequence, by adding repetitive TTAGGG sequences to the end of the telomere, prevents its shortening and naturally prevents cell aging. The protein complex shelterin, or telosome, protects telomere ends. The shelterin complex is made up of telomeric repeat binding factors 1 and 2 (TERF1 and TERF2), repressor/activator protein 1 (RAP1), protection of telomeres 1 (POT1), TERF1 interacting nuclear factor 2 (TINF2), and TPP1.
Figure 3 Telomerase components and TERT structure. Telomerase is composed of three main components—hTERT, hTERC, and DKC1. The hTERC is associated with DKC1 and small nucleolar RNPs, NOP10, NHP2, and GAR1. The sequence, by adding repetitive TTAGGG sequences to the end of the telomere, prevents its shortening and naturally prevents cell aging. The protein complex shelterin, or telosome, protects telomere ends. The shelterin complex is made up of telomeric repeat binding factors 1 and 2 (TERF1 and TERF2), repressor/activator protein 1 (RAP1), protection of telomeres 1 (POT1), TERF1 interacting nuclear factor 2 (TINF2), and TPP1.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4 An overview of various types of cell immortalization methods.
Figure 4 An overview of various types of cell immortalization methods.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

47 Check pending · 37 No full text of the sources · 16 Own interpretation · 5 Not checked yet

  • Probably not a substantial claim. 16
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 45

Create a free account to see these claims.

Create a free account to see these assumptions.

44 more claims

Create a free account to see all 105 claims and to verify the 66 references still open.

See all claims — free account

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

2 of 2

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Kulshreshtha, A., and Agrawal, A. (2020). RNA-Based Regulation in Human Health and Disease, Elsevier.
  2. Cooke, H.J., and Smith, B. (2019). Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.
  3. Depcrynski, A.N., Sachs, P.C., Elmore, L.W., and Holt, S.E. (2009). Telomeres and Telomerase in Cancer, Humana Press.
  4. Earle, 1943, Production of malignancy in vitro, J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 4, 165

Cited by

See all 66

Metadata

Authors
Chalak, M., Hesaraki, M., Mirbahari, S. N., Yeganeh, M., Abdi, S., Rajabi, S., & Hemmatzadeh, F.
Affiliations
  • University of Science and Culture (IR)
  • Royan Institute (IR)
  • University of Tehran (IR)
  • Adelaide University (AU)
Corresponding author
  • Rajabi, Sarah
  • Hemmatzadeh, Farhid
Venue
Life
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2024-03-21
Volume
14
Issue
3
Pages
417
ISSN
2075-1729 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4393039470
Cited by
66
References
174
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 9
FWCI
2.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Life (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
University of Adelaide
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
Keywords
cell immortalization, cellular senescence, Hayflick limit, telomere shortening, cell lines, in vitro cell culture, subculture

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-12, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-12 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review