CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 2,173Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesMind wandering and attentionAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A default mode of brain function: A brief history of an evolving idea

Raichle, Marcus E., Snyder, Abraham Z.·2007·NeuroImage
DOI 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.02.041
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The concept of a default mode of brain function arose out of a focused need to explain the appearance of activity decreases in functional neuroimaging data when the control state was passive visual fixation or eyes closed resting. The problem was particularly compelling because these activity decreases were remarkably consistent across a wide variety of task conditions. Using PET, we determined that these activity decreases did not arise from activations in the resting state. Hence, their presence implied the existence of a default mode. While the unique constellation of brain areas provoking this analysis has come to be known as the default system, all areas of the brain have a high level of organized default functional activity. Most critically, this work has called attention to the importance of intrinsic functional activity in assessing brain behavior relationships.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.02.041

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 20 references

Research works printed but not linked: 52

  1. Abbott, 2005, Drivers and modulators from push–pull and balanced synaptic input, Prog. Brain Res., 149, 147, 10.1016/S0079-6123(05)49011-1 · DOI
  2. Aguirre, 2002, Experimental design and the relative sensitivity of BOLD and perfusion fMRI, NeuroImage, 15, 488, 10.1006/nimg.2001.0990 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Amedi, 2005, Negative BOLD differentiates visual imagery and perception, Neuron, 48, 859, 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.10.032 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Arieli, 1996, Dynamics of ongoing activity: explanation of the large variability in evoked cortical responses, Science, 273, 1868, 10.1126/science.273.5283.1868 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Attwell, 2002, The neural basis of functional brain imaging signals, Trends Neurosci., 25, 621, 10.1016/S0166-2236(02)02264-6 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Attwell, 2001, An energy budget for signaling in the grey matter of the brain, J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab., 21, 1133, 10.1097/00004647-200110000-00001 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Brain, 1961, The neurology of language, Speech Pathol. Ther., 4, 47
  8. Buckner, R.L., Vincent, J.L., in press. Unrest at rest: an argument for studying sontaneous brain activity. NeuroImage.
  9. Detre, 2002, Technical aspects and utility of fMRI using BOLD and ASL, Clin. Neurophysiol., 113, 621, 10.1016/S1388-2457(02)00038-X · DOI · Paper page
  10. Drevets, 1995, Blood flow changes in human somatosensory cortex during anticipated stimulation, Nature, 373, 249, 10.1038/373249a0 · DOI
  11. Fox, 1986, Focal physiological uncoupling of cerebral blood flow and oxidative metabolism during somatosensory stimulation in human subjects, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 83, 1140, 10.1073/pnas.83.4.1140 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Fox, 2005, The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 102, 9673, 10.1073/pnas.0504136102 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Ghatan, 1998, Coexistence of attention-based facilitation and inhibition in the human cortex, NeuroImage, 7, 23, 10.1006/nimg.1997.0307 · DOI
  14. Gusnard, 2001, Searching for a baseline: functional imaging and the resting human brain, Nat. Rev., Neurosci., 2, 685, 10.1038/35094500 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Hahn, 2006, Phase-locking of hippocampal interneurons' membrane potential to neocortical up-down states, Nat. Neurosci., 9, 1359, 10.1038/nn1788 · DOI
  16. Haider, 2006, Neocortical network activity in vivo is generated through a dynamic balance of excitation and inhibition, J. Neurosci., 26, 4535, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5297-05.2006 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Ingvar, 1985, Memory of the future: an essay on the temporal organization of conscious awareness, Hum. Neurobiol., 4, 127
  18. Isomura, 2006, Integration and segregation of activity in entorhinal–hippocampal subregions by neocortical slow oscillations, Neuron, 52, 871, 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.10.023 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Kawashima, 1995, Positron-emission tomography studies of cross-modality inhibition in selective attentional tasks: closing the “mind's eye”, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 92, 5969, 10.1073/pnas.92.13.5969 · DOI
  20. Kay, 2005, Theta oscillations and sensorimotor performance, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 102, 3863, 10.1073/pnas.0407920102 · DOI
  21. Kim, 1999, Determination of relative CMRO2 from CBF and BOLD changes: significant increase of oxygen consumption rate during visual stimulation, Magn. Reson. Med., 41, 1152, 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2594(199906)41:6<1152::AID-MRM11>3.0.CO;2-T · DOI
  22. Kwong, 1992, Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of human brain activity during primary sensory stimulation, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 89, 5675, 10.1073/pnas.89.12.5675 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Lauritzen, 2005, Reading vascular changes in brain imaging: is dendritic calcium the key?, Nat. Rev., Neurosci., 6, 77, 10.1038/nrn1589 · DOI
  24. Lebrun-Grandie, 1983, Coupling between regional blood flow and oxygen utilization in the normal human brain. A study with positron tomography and oxygen 15, Arch. Neurol., 40, 230, 10.1001/archneur.1983.04050040060010 · DOI
  25. Leopold, 2003, Very slow activity fluctuations in monkey visual cortex: implications for functional brain imaging, Cereb. Cortex, 13, 422, 10.1093/cercor/13.4.422 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Luczak, 2007, Sequential structure of neocortical spontaneous activity in vivo, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 104, 347, 10.1073/pnas.0605643104 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Martin, 1987, Cerebral blood volume measured with inhaled C15O and positron emission tomography, J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab., 7, 421, 10.1038/jcbfm.1987.85 · DOI
  28. Mazoyer, 2001, Cortical networks for working memory and executive functions sustain the conscious resting state in man, Brain Res. Bull., 54, 287, 10.1016/S0361-9230(00)00437-8 · DOI · Paper page
  29. McGuire, 1996, Brain activity during stimulus independent thought, NeuroReport, 7, 2095
  30. Mintun, 1984, Brain oxygen utilization measured with O-15 radiotracers and positron emission tomography, J. Nucl. Med., 25, 177
  31. Mintun, 2002, Time-related increase of oxygen utilization in continuously activated human visual cortex, NeuroImage, 16, 531, 10.1006/nimg.2002.1114 · DOI
  32. Morcom, 2007, Does the brain have a baseline? Why we should be resisting a rest, NeuroImage, 37, 1073, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.09.013 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Ogawa, 1992, Intrinsic signal changes accompanying sensory stimulation: functional brain mapping with magnetic resonance imaging, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 89, 5951, 10.1073/pnas.89.13.5951 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Olshausen, 2005, How close are we to understanding v1?, Neural Comput., 17, 1665, 10.1162/0899766054026639 · DOI
  35. Pellerin, 2003, Food for thought: challenging the dogmas, J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab., 23, 1282, 10.1097/01.WCB.0000096064.12129.3D · DOI
  36. Petersen, 1998, The effects of practice on the functional anatomy of task performance, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 95, 853, 10.1073/pnas.95.3.853 · DOI
  37. Petersen, 2003, Interaction of sensory responses with spontaneous depolarization in layer 2/3 barrel cortex, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 100, 13638, 10.1073/pnas.2235811100 · DOI
  38. Raichle, 1998, Behind the scenes of functional brain imaging: a historical and physiological perspective, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 95, 765, 10.1073/pnas.95.3.765 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Raichle, 2006, The brain's dark energy, Science, 314, 1249
  40. Raichle, 2002, Appraising the brain's energy budget, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 99, 10237, 10.1073/pnas.172399499 · DOI
  41. Raichle, 2005, Intrinsic brain activity sets the stage for expression of motivated behavior, J. Comp. Neurol., 493, 167, 10.1002/cne.20752 · DOI
  42. Raichle, 1983, Brain blood flow measured with intravenous H2(15)O. II. Implementation and validation, J. Nucl. Med., 24, 790
  43. Raichle, 1994, Practice-related changes in human brain functional anatomy during nonmotor learning, Cereb. Cortex, 4, 8, 10.1093/cercor/4.1.8 · DOI · Paper page
  44. Salinas, 2001, Correlated neuronal activity and the flow of neural information, Nat. Rev., Neurosci., 2, 539, 10.1038/35086012 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Seneca, L.C., ∼60 A.D., 1969. Letters from a Stoic: Epistulae Morales ad Lucilium. New York, Penguin Books.
  46. Shmuel, 2006, Negative functional MRI response correlates with decreases in neuronal activity in monkey visual area V1, Nat. Neurosci., 9, 569, 10.1038/nn1675 · DOI · Paper page
  47. Shulman, 1997, Common blood flow changes across visual tasks: II. Decreases in cerebral cortex, J. Cogn. Neurosci., 9, 648, 10.1162/jocn.1997.9.5.648 · DOI · Paper page
  48. Simpson, 2001, Emotion-induced changes in human medial prefrontal cortex: II. During anticipatory anxiety, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 98, 688, 10.1073/pnas.98.2.688 · DOI
  49. Smith, 2000, Attentional suppression of activity in the human visual cortex, NeuroReport, 11, 271, 10.1097/00001756-200002070-00010 · DOI
  50. Somers, 1999, Functional MRI reveals spatially specific attentional modulation in human primary visual cortex, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 96, 1663, 10.1073/pnas.96.4.1663 · DOI
  51. Sprague, 1966, Interaction of cortex and superior colliculus in mediation of visually guided behavior in the cat, Science, 153, 1544, 10.1126/science.153.3743.1544 · DOI
  52. Vincent, J.L., Patel, G.H., et al., in press. Intrinsic function architecture in the anesthetized monkey brain. Nature.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Raichle, M. E., & Snyder, A. Z.
Affiliations
Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Corresponding author
Raichle, Marcus E.
ORCID
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-10
Volume
37
Issue
4
Pages
1083-1090
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.02.041
OpenAlex
W2093972428
Cited by
2,173
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 38 · 2025: 79 · 2024: 106 · 2023: 65 · 2022: 99 · 2021: 92 · 2020: 94 · 2019: 122 · 2018: 111 · 2017: 133 · 2016: 141 · 2015: 163 · 2014: 176 · 2013: 167 · 2012: 163
FWCI
6.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Mind wandering and attention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Keywords
default mode network, resting state, intrinsic brain activity, functional neuroimaging, positron emission tomography, brain-behavior relationship
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Cognition, Fixation, Ocular, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Oxygen, Reference Standards, Vision, Ocular, Positron-Emission Tomography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review