Cited by 309Cannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchPain Mechanisms and TreatmentsPain Management and Treatment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 186 of the 187 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 273 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Cannabinoids as Pharmacotherapies for Neuropathic Pain: From the Bench to the Bedside

Open access
Rahn, Elizabeth J., Hohmann, Andrea G.·2009·Neurotherapeutics

Abstract

SummaryNeuropathic pain is a debilitating form of chronic pain resulting from nerve injury, disease states, or toxic insults. Neuropathic pain is often refractory to conventional pharmacotherapies, necessitating validation of novel analgesics. Cannabinoids, drugs that share the same target as Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC), the psychoactive ingredient in cannabis, have the potential to address this unmet need. Here, we review studies evaluating cannabinoids for neuropathic pain management in the clinical and preclinical literature. Neuropathic pain associated with nerve injury, diabetes, chemotherapeutic treatment, human immunodeficiency virus, multiple sclerosis, and herpes zoster infection is considered. In animals, cannabinoids attenuate neuropathic nociception produced by traumatic nerve injury, disease, and toxic insults. Effects of mixed cannabinoid CB1/CB2 agonists, CB2 selective agonists, and modulators of the endocannabinoid system (i.e., inhibitors of transport or degradation) are compared. Effects of genetic disruption of cannabinoid receptors or enzymes controlling endocannabinoid degradation on neuropathic nociception are described. Specific forms of allodynia and hyperalgesia modulated by cannabinoids are also considered. In humans, effects of smoked marijuana, synthetic Δ9-THC analogs (e.g., Marinol, Cesamet) and medicinal cannabis preparations containing both Δ9-THC and cannabidiol (e.g., Sativex, Cannador) in neuropathic pain states are reviewed. Clinical studies largely affirm that neuropathic pain patients derive benefits from cannabinoid treatment. Subjective (i.e., rating scales) and objective (i.e., stimulus-evoked) measures of pain and quality of life are considered. Finally, limitations of cannabinoid pharmacotherapies are discussed together with directions for future research.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This review synthesizes preclinical and clinical evidence that cannabinoids and endocannabinoid modulators suppress neuropathic pain via CB1 and CB2 mechanisms. Clinical studies largely support efficacy in neuropathic pain, but side effects, small trials, and long-term safety questions remain.

Key findings

  • In animals, cannabinoids attenuate neuropathic nociception in at least nine surgically induced traumatic nerve/nervous system injury models and in disease/toxic models (diabetes, chemotherapy, HIV, demyelination, post-herpetic neuralgia); mixed CB1/CB2 agonists, CB2-selective agonists, and FAAH/MGL/transport inhibitors are effective, often via CB1 and/or CB2, with nonneuronal microglial CB2 mechanisms implicated.
  • Clinical studies largely affirm benefit: in HIV-associated sensory neuropathy, 52% (13/25) receiving cannabis cigarettes had >30% pain reduction; smoked cannabis was superior to placebo on DDS/VAS without negative impact on CD4/CD8/T-cell counts or viral load.
  • In MS-related neuropathic pain, dronabinol, Cannador, and Sativex improved pain/spasticity/sleep; one 1-year follow-up reported 74% of placebo vs 45% cannabinoid patients discontinued for lack of benefit; Sativex open-label: 95% entered, 54% completed 1 year, 44% completed 2 years, 25% withdrew due adverse events, 95% had ≥1 adverse event.
  • Adverse-event review: 96.6% of medical cannabinoid adverse events were not serious and no serious adverse events were exclusively cannabinoid-related; 99% of serious adverse events from randomized trials came from only two trials. Negative clinical studies were small (≤8 subjects) and used oral dronabinol.

Methods

  • Narrative review of preclinical and clinical literature on cannabinoids for neuropathic pain, covering nerve injury, diabetes, chemotherapy, HIV, MS, and herpes zoster.
  • Compares mixed CB1/CB2 agonists, CB2-selective agonists, endocannabinoid transport/degradation inhibitors, and genetic knockout models; clinical review includes smoked marijuana, synthetic Δ9-THC analogs (Marinol, Cesamet), and cannabis preparations with Δ9-THC and cannabidiol (Sativex, Cannador).
  • No systematic search strategy, meta-analysis, or formal risk-of-bias assessment is described.

Limitations

  • Stated: psychoactive effects of centrally acting CB1 agonists and side effects (dizziness, balance impairment, intoxication, dry mouth, dysgeusia, sedation, hunger) challenge therapy; high-quality long-term safety trials are needed.
  • Stated: two negative clinical studies were small (≤8 subjects), used oral dronabinol titrated to 25 mg/day (mean 16.6 ± 6.5 mg and 15 ± 6 mg), and had prominent side effects/high dropout; patients had mixed refractory neuropathic pain.
  • Evident from text: as a narrative review, it does not systematically quantify evidence; preclinical pharmacological specificity was not consistently assessed, and many clinical studies were small, mixed-population, or open-label extensions.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.nurt.2009.08.002

Cites

186 of 186 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 of 273 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

Show all 164 claims

  • Probably not a substantial claim. 23
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 135
146 of 146
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Neuropathic pain is a debilitating form of chronic pain caused by damage to the nervous system, resulting from peripheral nerve injury, toxic insults, or disease states.

    “Neuropathic pain is a debilitating form of chronic pain resulting from nerve injury, disease states, or toxic insults.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Neuropathic pain is often refractory to conventional pharmacotherapies, necessitating validation of novel analgesics.

    “Neuropathic pain is often refractory to conventional pharmacotherapies, necessitating validation of novel analgesics.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Neuropathic pain responds poorly to available therapies and remains a significant clinical problem.

    “Neuropathic pain remains a significant clinical problem because it responds poorly to available therapies.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Adverse side-effect profiles may limit therapeutic dosing and contribute to inadequate pain relief.

    “Moreover, adverse side-effect profiles may limit therapeutic dosing and contribute to inadequate pain relief.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Activation of CB1 receptors suppresses neuronal excitability and transmitter release by suppressing calcium conductance and inhibiting inward rectifying potassium conductance.

    “Activation of CB1 receptors suppresses calcium conductance and inhibits inward rectifying potassium conductance, thereby suppressing neuronal excitability and transmitter release.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Microglia secrete pro-inflammatory factors and induce the release of mediators associated with synaptogenesis and plasticity, leading to changes in neuronal excitability.

    “Microglia secrete pro-inflammatory factors and induce the release of several mediators (e.g. nitric oxide (NO), neurotrophins, free radicals) that are associated with synaptogenesis and plasticity, leading to changes in neuronal excitability.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Spontaneous firing of wide dynamic range neurons contributes to behavioral hypersensitivity and neuronal sensitization in neuropathic pain states.

    “Spontaneous firing of WDR neurons is believed to contribute to behavioral hypersensitivity and neuronal sensitization in neuropathic pain states.”
7 of 7

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 187 references

1 of the 187 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–309 of 309

Metadata

Authors
Rahn, E. J., & Hohmann, A. G.
Affiliations
University of Georgia (US)
Corresponding author
Hohmann, Andrea G.
Venue
Neurotherapeutics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-10
Volume
6
Issue
4
Pages
713-737
ISSN
1878-7479 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2020010905
Cited by
305
References
187
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 20
FWCI
1.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neurotherapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Psi Chi
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA022478, R21DA022478, R01DA021644, DA021644)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
Keywords
cannabinoids, neuropathic pain, delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol, endocannabinoid system, CB1 receptor, CB2 receptor, CB2 receptor agonist, endocannabinoid degradation, nerve injury, diabetic neuropathy, chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy, HIV neuropathy, multiple sclerosis, herpes zoster, allodynia, hyperalgesia, cannabis smoking, Marinol, Sativex, analgesia
MeSH terms
Animals, Cannabinoids, Chronic Disease, Disease Models, Animal, Humans, Neuralgia, Peripheral Nervous System Diseases, Receptors, Cannabinoid, Cannabinoid Receptor Modulators

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-09, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-09 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review