Cited by 430Bioinformatics and Genomic NetworksGenetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 225 of the 225 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 281 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Systems biology and gene networks in neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative disorders

Abstract

Genetic and genomic approaches have implicated hundreds of genetic loci in neurodevelopmental disorders and neurodegeneration, but mechanistic understanding continues to lag behind the pace of gene discovery. Understanding the role of specific genetic variants in the brain involves dissecting a functional hierarchy that encompasses molecular pathways, diverse cell types, neural circuits and, ultimately, cognition and behaviour. With a focus on transcriptomics, this Review discusses how high-throughput molecular, integrative and network approaches inform disease biology by placing human genetics in a molecular systems and neurobiological context. We provide a framework for interpreting network biology studies and leveraging big genomics data sets in neurobiology.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This review argues that transcriptomic and integrative network methods can connect genetic risk to molecular systems in neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative disorders. It outlines network construction, annotation, and validation steps and offers design and reproducibility recommendations for CNS post-mortem and model studies.

Key findings

  • Genetic studies have linked hundreds to thousands of loci to these disorders, and more than 1,000 Mendelian neurodevelopmental forms are known; pleiotropy suggests disruption of constrained developmental programs rather than one-to-one gene–disorder mapping.
  • In ASD cortex, co-expression analysis found an upregulated module enriched for immune/microglial genes and a downregulated module enriched for synaptic/neuronal genes; the latter was proposed as potentially causal, the former reactive. Schizophrenia studies report dysregulation of GABAergic, oligodendrocyte/myelin, mitochondrial/energy, synaptic, and immune/inflammatory pathways, with a neuronal differentiation module failing normal age-related downregulation.
  • Network approaches can organize whole-tissue transcriptomes into modules, relate them to cell types, regions, and GWAS signals, and identify hubs; examples include fetal cortical glutamatergic neuron convergence for ASD risk and TYROBP as a microglial regulatory hub in Alzheimer disease validated in mice.
  • The review recommends sample sizes: at least 15 cases and 15 controls for initial post-mortem DGE, 20 independent samples for module-level reproducibility, a minimum of 20 per condition for comparative network studies, and at least 100 cases and controls for integrating genetics with co-expression in Alzheimer disease.

Methods

  • Narrative review of systems biology and gene network studies in neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative disorders, focused on transcriptomics but generalizable to genomic, proteomic, and epigenomic data.
  • Synthesizes findings from post-mortem human brain, mouse, fly, iPSC-derived neuron, single-cell, PPI, eQTL, GWAS, and consortium resources such as BrainSpan, GTEx, and Roadmap Epigenomics.
  • Provides a five-step network framework (node and edge specification, module identification, annotation, validation) and experimental design and reproducibility guidelines.

Limitations

  • The paper states that CNS complexity (cell type, spatial, and temporal heterogeneity), scarce human tissue and imperfect model systems, and poorly defined intermediate phenotypes hamper molecular profiling; cell type definitions remain controversial and many phenotypes are clinical/behavioral rather than mechanistic.
  • It notes that post-mortem tissue reflects late disease consequences, literature-curated pathway and PPI databases are biased and often non-neuronal, and most molecular profiling studies cannot establish causality without follow-up experiments or genetic evidence.
  • Evident from the text: as a review, it presents no new primary data or systematic meta-analysis beyond illustrative examples; its recommendations are based on existing theoretical and empirical assessments and may not fit all CNS study designs.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrg3934

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 of 281 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 57
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 17
70 of 70
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Most neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative disorders are defined by perturbations in specific cognitive and/or behavioural domains, pointing to selective vulnerability of specific cells.

    “Most neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative disorders are defined by perturbations in specific cognitive and/or behavioural domains, pointing to a selective vulnerability of specific cells.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Molecular signatures of specific cell types, finer-grained temporal dynamics, and causal or reactive alterations in CNS diseases remain mostly uncharacterized.

    “However, the molecular signatures of specific cell types, finer-grained temporal dynamics and causal or reactive alterations in CNS diseases remain mostly uncharacterized (FIG. 1c).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    In neurodevelopmental disorders, the specific brain regions, cell types or time points that are most affected remain poorly defined.

    “In neurodevelopmental disorders, the specific brain regions, cell types or time points that are most affected remain poorly defined and whole-tissue profiling still holds great value.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The relationships of human disease phenotypes to developmental trajectories are relatively unknown.

    “the relationships of human disease phenotypes to developmental trajectories are relatively unknown”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Model systems in many neurobiological studies are often chosen on the basis of convenience and history.

    “model systems in many neurobiological studies are often chosen on the basis of convenience and history”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    DGE analysis does not take into account the relationships between genes.

    “Differential gene expression analysis (DGE analysis) addresses this issue, albeit one gene at a time, but does not take into account the relationships between genes.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Gene networks built on data containing even a small fraction of literature-curated components can contain substantial bias.

    “Gene networks that are built on data that contain even a small fraction of literature-curated components can contain substantial bias.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Networks with edges derived from shared pathway membership can reflect cellular states that might not be found in the CNS and will lack many important CNS-specific relationships.

    “However, networks with edges that are derived from shared pathway membership can reflect cellular states that might not be found in the CNS, and they will certainly lack many important CNS-specific relationships.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Most genome-wide PPI experiments use methods such as yeast two-hybrid screens or tandem affinity purification and are cell type agnostic.

    “Alternatively, most genome-wide PPI experiments use methods such as yeast two-hybrid (Y2H) screens or tandem affinity purification and are cell type agnostic.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Transcriptomics, epigenomics and proteomics query unique levels of cellular or tissue organization.

    “When combining multiple molecular levels in networks, it is important to recognize that transcriptomics, epigenomics and proteomics all query unique levels of cellular or tissue organization.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    A shortcoming of studies using post-mortem brain tissue is that the tissue is usually obtained long after the disease-causing changes have occurred.

    “A shortcoming of studies using post-mortem brain tissue is that the tissue is usually obtained long after the disease-causing changes have occurred.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Patients with schizophrenia have greater comorbidity of confounders such as smoking, alcohol and substance abuse than those with ASD.

    “However, patients with schizophrenia have greater comorbidity of confounders such as smoking, alcohol and substance abuse than those with ASD.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Transcriptional studies of schizophrenia have benefited from considerably larger sample sizes than those of ASD.

    “Transcriptional studies of schizophrenia have benefited from considerably larger sample sizes than those of ASD.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Combining multiple lines of evidence increases the power to detect disease-relevant interactions.

    “The idea that multiple lines of evidence may increase the power to detect disease-relevant interactions has motivated the integration of literature-curated, molecular and genetic evidence to support specific genes or pathways.”
14 of 14

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • NETBAG validation organism conflicts with cited reference

    Minor

    The text says the cited work demonstrated the approach in yeast, but reference 128 identifies its subject as Caenorhabditis elegans.

1 of 1

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 225 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Miller, J. A. & Geschwind, D. H. in Systems Biology for Signaling Networks (ed. Choi, S.) Ch. 25 611–643 (Springer, 2010). · DOI
  2. Butte, A. J. & Kohane, I. S. in Pacific Symposiumon Biocomputing 2000 (eds Altman, R. B. et al.) 418–429 (World Scientific, 2000).
  3. Horvath, S. Weighted Network Analysis: Applications in Genomics and Systems Biology (Springer, 2011). · DOI
  4. Good, P. I. Permutation, Parametric, and Bootstrap Tests of Hypotheses (Springer, 2010).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 430

Metadata

Authors
Parikshak, N. N., Gandal, M. J., & Geschwind, D. H.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Geschwind, Daniel H.
Venue
Nature Reviews Genetics
Published
2015-07-07
Volume
16
Issue
8
Pages
441-458
ISSN
  • 1471-0056 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-0064
OpenAlex
W1508717233
Cited by
430
References
233
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 57 · 2018: 54 · 2017: 47 · 2016: 42 · 2015: 5
FWCI
4.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Reviews Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01mh094714-04)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (5R01MH094714, R01-MH094714, F30MH099886, R01MH100027, T32MH073526, R37MH060233)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM008042)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Keywords
neurodevelopmental disorders, neurodegenerative diseases, gene networks, systems biology, transcriptomics, genetic loci, network biology, molecular pathways, neural circuits
MeSH terms
Brain, Developmental Disabilities, Humans, Models, Neurological, Neurobiology, Neurodegenerative Diseases, Gene Expression Profiling, Systems Biology, Gene Regulatory Networks, High-Throughput Screening Assays

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-06, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-06 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review