The DOI matches its Crossref record; 379 of the 379 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 12 of the 439 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium
Open accessAbstract
The retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), a monolayer of post-mitotic polarized epithelial cells, strategically situated between the photoreceptors and the choroid, is the primary caretaker of photoreceptor health and function. Dysfunction of the RPE underlies many inherited and acquired diseases that cause permanent blindness. Decades of research have yielded valuable insight into the cell biology of the RPE. In recent years, new technologies such as live-cell imaging have resulted in major advancement in our understanding of areas such as the daily phagocytosis and clearance of photoreceptor outer segment tips, autophagy, endolysosome function, and the metabolic interplay between the RPE and photoreceptors. In this review, we aim to integrate these studies with an emphasis on appropriate models and techniques to investigate RPE cell biology and metabolism, and discuss how RPE cell biology informs our understanding of retinal disease.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This review synthesizes RPE cell biology, emphasizing outer segment phagocytosis, LC3-associated phagocytosis, classical autophagy, organelle function, and metabolic coupling with photoreceptors. It argues that appropriate, well-polarized RPE models and live-cell imaging are essential for understanding RPE health and retinal disease.
Key findings
- The RPE is a post-mitotic, polarized monolayer that supports photoreceptors; in the central human retina, ~33 photoreceptors are associated with each RPE cell, while the mouse central retina has >200 per RPE cell and peripheral ratios are ~12 in human and 100–120 in mouse.
- OS phagocytosis follows a daily rhythm: rod OS phagosomes peak after light onset, cone OS phagosomes vary by species, and mouse/zebrafish RPE can show two peaks after light onset and lights-off. Phagosome degradation involves apical-to-basal migration, acidification, and proteases including cathepsin D and cysteine proteases; LAP recruits LC3B to ~30–45% of ingested phagosomes in vitro/in vivo, though GFP-LC3B overexpression yields 80–90%.
- Autophagy and endolysosomal defects are linked to AMD and inherited retinal degenerations; RPE-specific loss of RB1CC1 causes RPE atrophy by 4 months, and RPE-specific Atg5 or Atg7 deletions produce retinal degeneration in 35–45% of mice between 8 and 24 months.
- RPE metabolism is oxidative and coupled to photoreceptors: OSs are ~50% protein and 50% lipid by weight, and in human fetal RPE, ~50% of palmitate-derived acetyl-CoA is diverted to ketogenesis to produce β-hydroxybutyrate; Hmgcs2 transcripts are 30% higher and PGC-1 is 50% higher at 1.5 versus 9 h after light onset.
Methods
- Narrative review integrating decades of published RPE cell biology, with no primary experimental data reported.
- Discusses experimental preparations including RPE/choroid/sclera flatmounts, primary RPE cultures from rodent/pig/human sources, stem cell-derived RPE, and cell lines such as RPE-J, hTERT-RPE1, and ARPE-19, often on Transwell filters for polarization and live-cell imaging.
- Main analysis is a synthesis of mechanisms across OS phagocytosis, LAP, classical autophagy, organelle biology, and RPE-photoreceptor metabolism, with emphasis on model selection and appropriate techniques.
Limitations
- The paper states model limitations: flatmounts remain useful for only hours; primary human RPE has limited tissue availability and dedifferentiates with passaging; stem cell-derived RPE has inefficient transfection and limited passaging before failing to re-differentiate; ARPE-19 has genetic abnormalities and diminished differentiation with passage; in vitro metabolism does not recapitulate the in vivo RPE environment.
- The paper identifies many open questions, including what distinguishes LC3-associated OS phagosomes, how autophagy is scaled to diurnal phagocytosis, how the organelle interactome changes with age/disease, and the need for in vivo RPE metabolic studies.
- Evident from the text: as a narrative review, it does not conduct a systematic search or meta-analysis and reports no new experimental data; conclusions depend on cited studies and model-dependent findings.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
328 Not checked yet · 107 No basis given · 65 Own interpretation · 6 Partly supported · 3 Supported · 2 Own result · 1 Sources not found · 1 Own method · accuracy not yet measured
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“These cultures also have a high trans-epithelial electrical resistance (TER), from 500 to over 800 Ω cm2 (Hu and Bok, 2001; Maminishkis et al., 2006; Sonoda et al., 2009).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE cell models > Primary RPE cell cultures
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hu and Bok, 2001
- Not checked yetcites Maminishkis et al., 2006 source
- Partly supportedcites Sonoda et al., 2009 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Experimental Design section on transepithelial resistance says these human fetal RPE cultures typically plateau above 500 Ω·cm². Our copy does not substantiate the claimed upper value of over 800 Ω·cm². (LLM, conf=0.85)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“and iPS-RPE from patients with different monogenic forms of macular degeneration were observed to accumulate drusen deposits after 90 days of culture (Galloway et al., 2017).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE cell models > Stem cell-derived RPE cultures
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Galloway et al., 2017 source
The Results section reports that day-90 patient-derived hiPSC-RPE cultures from three macular dystrophies (SFD, DHRD, and ADRD) displayed drusen-like sub-RPE deposits. This supports the claim, though the paper describes the cultured deposits as “drusen-like.” (LLM, conf=0.92)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Focal adhesion kinase (FAK) appears to be the bridging step between OS recognition by αvβ5 integrin and OS engulfment mediated by MERTK (Finnemann, 2003).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Ingestion of OS membranes by the RPE
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Finnemann, 2003 source
The Discussion identifies FAK signaling in response to αvβ5-dependent OS binding as essential for subsequent activation of the engulfment machinery, including MerTK phosphorylation. It also describes a functional interaction between αvβ5 and MerTK via FAK. The paper’s copy does not provide page numbers for these passages. (LLM, conf=0.94)
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“While LC3B-II-opsin association is clearly observed (Fig. 10), the extent of LC3B-II association with opsin-positive phagosomes remains unclear; in vitro (Frost et al., 2015) and in vivo (Dhingra et al., 2018) studies suggest that ~30–45% of ingested phagosomes are LC3B-positive.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Intersection of phagocytosis with autophagy: LC3-associated phagocytosis > LC3-associated phagocytosis in OS phagosome clearance
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Frost et al., 2015 source
The Results section, “LC3 Associates with Opsin-Positive Phagosomes in Human Fetal Cells” (page unavailable), reports that over 40% of ingested photoreceptor outer segments were LC3-positive after a 30-minute chase, consistent with the approximate range cited for the in vitro study. The in vivo portion of the sentence is attributed to Dhingra et al., not to this source. (LLM, conf=0.86)
- Partly supportedcites Dhingra et al., 2018 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion section, “Importance of LC3B for Efficient OS Degradation and Lipid Metabolism” (page unavailable), says LC3B associates with ingested phagosomes. The Methods and Results describe counting phagosomes in mice, but do not report what fraction were LC3B-positive; the attributed 30–45% estimate is therefore unsupported by this copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Phospholipases generate the fatty acid substrates from ingested OS disk membrane phospholipids for mitochondrial β-oxidation (see section 6) (Reyes-Reveles et al., 2017).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Degradation of OS phagosomes by the RPE
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Reyes-Reveles et al., 2017 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion (page unavailable) links digestion of ingested outer segments to fatty acid oxidation and ketogenesis, supporting their use as a source of fatty acid substrates. Our copy does not say that phospholipases release those substrates from disk membrane phospholipids; a search for phospholipase did not identify that mechanism. (LLM, conf=0.86)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
In the paper
“In addition to Na+/K+-ATPase, polarized expression of other ion pumps and channels help regulate the environment around the photoreceptors, which is important for photoreceptor electrophysiology and viability (Wimmers et al., 2007).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Introduction > Organization and function of the RPE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Wimmers et al., 2007 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“However, electroporation or nucleofection has been reported to yield transfection efficiencies of ~20–40% (Toops et al., 2014).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE cell models > Primary RPE cell cultures
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Toops et al., 2014 source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In the human eye, each RPE cell takes care of ~30 photoreceptors (Osterberg, 1935), which places a unique burden on the degradative machinery of the cell.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Introduction > Organization and function of the RPE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Osterberg, 1935
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Second, non-viral lipid-based gene transfection is less efficient in primary RPE due to their post-mitotic nature.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE cell models > Primary RPE cell cultures
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“There are now published protocols using directed approaches that provide relatively efficient differentiation into cultures of cells, reported to possess a wide range of RPE characteristics, including gene expression, polarized organization, and physiological and cell biological functions (Idelson et al., 2009; Buchholz et al., 2013; Gong et al., 2015; Maruotti et al., 2015; Hazim et al., 2017).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE cell models > Stem cell-derived RPE cultures
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- It may state two separate claims as one. 202
- Probably not a substantial claim. 71
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Expression of “RPE signature” genes is important (Strunnikova et al., 2010); however, more importantly, the resulting proteins must be localized properly; e.g. the Na+/K+-ATPase should be in the apical membrane (not basal as is the case in RPE-J cells).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE cell models > RPE cell cultures – basic standards
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Strunnikova et al., 2010 source
The Discussion describes the highly expressed genes as a functional signature of RPE and suggests that a core set is minimally required for the RPE phenotype. The Strunnikova et al. citation is attached to the importance of expressing those genes, not to the subsequent statement about protein localization. (LLM, conf=0.92)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“before the identification of a genomic deletion in these animals that resulted in a truncated MERTK protein and lack of MERTK signaling (D’Cruz et al., 2000; Nandrot et al., 2000).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Ingestion of OS membranes by the RPE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites D’Cruz et al., 2000
- Partly supportedcites Nandrot et al., 2000 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction and the section on rat c-mer cDNA report a deletion in affected RCS rats that produces a shortened transcript encoding a 20-amino-acid peptide. In the section on evidence for c-mer as the causal gene, the authors say the peptide is *presumably* devoid of signaling capability; they do not establish the claim’s unqualified lack of MERTK signaling. The reported deletion was identified in cDNA, rather than directly demonstrated in genomic DNA in these passages. (LLM, conf=0.84)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Rubicon-deficient macrophages undergo normal levels of phagocytic uptake yet fail to recruit LC3B-II to phagosomes (Kim et al., 2013; Martinez et al., 2015; Wong et al., 2018).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Intersection of phagocytosis with autophagy: LC3-associated phagocytosis > LC3-associated phagocytosis in OS phagosome clearance
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Kim et al., 2013 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results section reports that silencing Atg5 or Beclin1 in retinal pigment epithelial cells prevented LC3 association with engulfed photoreceptor outer segments while having little effect on their uptake. The paper also describes LC3-associated phagocytosis in macrophages, but our copy does not report phagocytic uptake or LC3B-II recruitment in Rubicon-deficient macrophages (searched: Rubicon and Rubicon-deficient macrophages). (LLM, conf=0.78)
- Supportedcites Martinez et al., 2015 source
In Results (‘Rubicon is required for LAP’; page unavailable), the paper reports equivalent phagocytosis in wild-type and Rubicon-deficient macrophages, but no LC3 translocation to LAPosomes in the deficient cells. It also reports compromised LC3-II recruitment there; a later Results section identifies LC3B on LAPosomes. (LLM, conf=0.91)
- Partly supportedcites Wong et al., 2018 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
In “Rubicon in LC3-associated phagocytosis” (page unavailable), the review says Rubicon-deficient cells phagocytose normally but fail to recruit LC3-II to cargo-containing phagosomes. It does not specify macrophages or the LC3B isoform, so those details are not established by this copy. (LLM, conf=0.83)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“However, prolonged stress downregulates autophagy, which could send the cell into a spiral of increased debris, mitochondrial injury, and eventual metabolic reprogramming (Leidal et al., 2018; Levine and Kroemer, 2019).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Classical autophagy > Autophagy in models of age-related macular degeneration
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Leidal et al., 2018 source
- Partly supportedcites Levine and Kroemer, 2019 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
In “Autophagy in Genomic Stability and Tumor Suppression” (page unavailable), the review says impaired autophagy allows an autophagy substrate to accumulate and describes autophagy’s removal of dysfunctional mitochondria. It does not say that prolonged stress downregulates autophagy or that the resulting damage eventually causes metabolic reprogramming; its discussion of metabolic reprogramming concerns autophagy sustaining that process in pancreatic cancer cells. (LLM, conf=0.85)
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although not explicitly reported in the literature, we have observed high passage-number cultures of RPE cells from human ESCs and iPSCs undergoing dedifferentiation.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE cell models > Stem cell-derived RPE cultures
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Nevertheless, the ARPE-19 cells remain a widely used cell line, with ~170 papers published annually that mention “ARPE-19” or “ARPE19” in the title or abstract (based on a current PubMed search), and, presumably, many others that still report experiments on the ARPE-19 cells, but may not mention the cell line by name in the abstract.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE cell models > RPE cell lines
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“These cultures can survive up to 10 days and are amenable to experimental manipulations including transfection, transduction, and live-cell imaging (Gibbs et al., 2003).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE cell models > Primary RPE cell cultures
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Gibbs et al., 2003
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Nevertheless, a very high TER may be a characteristic of fetal RPE, and thus a potential drawback for modeling adult RPE.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE cell models > Primary RPE cell cultures
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Primary porcine RPE cultures, grown on Transwell filters, exhibit correct localization of tight junction markers, such as ZO-1, and have a TER of ~400 Ω cm2, as early as 2 weeks in culture (Toops et al., 2014).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE cell models > Primary RPE cell cultures
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Toops et al., 2014 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Moreover, an advantage of porcine eyes is that humans and pigs share similarities with regards to their immune systems, which is an advantage for studying diseases with a strong immune component like age-related macular degeneration (AMD) (Mair et al., 2014).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE cell models > Primary RPE cell cultures
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Mair et al., 2014 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A freshly-prepared RPE/choroid/sclera flatmount represents a close in situ approximation to in vivo RPE.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE cell models > Experimental preparations for studying the RPE
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“First, certain genes associated with human disease, such as the three different human-specific isoforms of apolipoprotein E, are not expressed in mice, pigs, or cattle, making it necessary to genetically modify these cells or to perform certain studies in human tissues.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE cell models > Primary RPE cell cultures
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“An important characteristic of primary RPE, iPS-RPE, and ES-RPE cells is that they can form well-differentiated, RPE-like cultures, demonstrating a polarized epithelial organization (Fig. 2), close approximation of native RPE gene and protein expression, and the ability to perform RPE functions, such as the ingestion and degradation of OSs over a time-course that is comparable to that in vivo (Mam”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE cell models > Primary RPE cell cultures
What the sources say
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Apical localization of Na+/K+-ATPase is likely to be important for spatial buffering of ions in the subretinal space and for depolarizing the photoreceptor plasma membrane during phototransduction.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Introduction > Organization and function of the RPE
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“ESCs and iPSCs can spontaneously differentiate along the neural lineage, and then to RPE cells, which are readily identified by virtue of pigmentation and cobblestone appearance (Kawasaki et al., 2002; Buchholz et al., 2009) (Fig. 4).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE cell models > Stem cell-derived RPE cultures
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As discussed below, crosstalk between lysosomal clearance of OSs, autophagic machinery and the endosomal network, as well as oxidative metabolism, is essential for maintaining RPE health and function.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Introduction > Organization and function of the RPE
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A limitation of these flatmounts is that they maintain many of their characteristics in culture medium for only a matter of hours, so that many manipulations are not practicable.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE cell models > Experimental preparations for studying the RPE
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“With the addition of pyruvate in high-glucose DMEM, it was shown that ARPE-19 cells recapitulated key features of RPE cells including RPE-specific differentiation markers, polygonal morphology, polar expression of proteins, extensive microvilli, the ability to phagocytose, and secretion of VEGF (Ahmado et al., 2011).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE cell models > RPE cell lines
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Ahmado et al., 2011 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“However, these cell lines have genetic abnormalities, with triploidy in the D407 line (Davis et al., 1995), and an abnormal karyotype (most notably, a loss of one copy of chromosome 15, and an unbalanced translocation between the chromosome 15q and 19q) in the ARPE-19 line (Fasler-Kan et al., 2018; Hazim et al., 2019).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE cell models > RPE cell lines
What the sources say
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Most animals (including mouse, rat, cat, hamster, Xenopus laevis, goldfish, rabbit, and chick) appear to be entrained to a circadian rhythm, which is cued by the light/dark cycle and persists even when the animal is maintained in absolute darkness (LaVail, 1976; Besharse et al., 1977; Grace et al., 1996), but not in absolute light (Teirstein et al., 1980).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > The daily rhythm of disk membrane phagocytosis
What the sources say
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“General disadvantages of stem cell-derived cultures, like those of primary cultures, include inefficient transfection (although not viral transduction), as well as the limited number of times they can be passaged before failing to re-differentiate fully into RPE cells (Adijanto and Philp, 2014).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE cell models > Stem cell-derived RPE cultures
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Adijanto and Philp, 2014
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, they do not develop polarity and a “cobblestone” organization that is typical of well-differentiated RPE monolayers.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE cell models > RPE cell lines
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The model of choice is dictated by the scientific question; to begin with, the cells should be RPE-like with respect to characteristics that are central to the mechanisms to be studied (Pfeffer and Philp, 2014).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE cell models > RPE cell cultures – basic standards
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Pfeffer and Philp, 2014
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The overall process of phagocytosis involves a series of stages. A prerequisite binding between the OS plasma membrane and the apical membrane of the RPE is followed by the formation of a phagocytic cup around the distal OS. The distal tip of the OS is then ingested and transported into the cell. The phagosome is degraded following interactions with endolysosomes, a process that appears to involve”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Turnover of phototransductive membrane
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Across species, rod OS phagosomes are most abundant just after light onset, whereas cone OS phagosomes, depending on the species, appear at the same time as rod OS phagosomes, or demonstrate a peak of phagocytosis just after lights-off, as in lizard, chicken, goldfish, and ground squirrels (Young, 1977, 1978; Ruggiero and Finnemann, 2014).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > The daily rhythm of disk membrane phagocytosis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Young, 1977 source
- Not checked yetcites Young, 1978
- Not checked yetcites Ruggiero and Finnemann, 2014
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Immortalized or transformed RPE cell lines, of course, differ in one major respect from RPE in vivo; that is, they must proliferate.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE cell models > RPE cell lines
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“These protocols required 3–4 months for RPE differentiation, whereas, a more recent protocol was able to achieve a similar level of differentiation within 4 weeks through the addition of nicotinamide instead of pyruvate (Hazim et al., 2019) (Fig. 5).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE cell models > RPE cell lines
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hazim et al., 2019 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In other animals, like the frog, Rana pipiens, there is a strong dependency on external light stimuli to initiate OS phagocytosis; complete darkness prevents phagocytosis (Basinger et al., 1976).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > The daily rhythm of disk membrane phagocytosis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Basinger et al., 1976 source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“They have been reported to express some RPE-associated proteins (e.g. cellular retinaldehyde-binding protein [CRALBP]) and become pigmented in the absence of serum after 4 or 8 weeks in culture (Rambhatla et al., 2002).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE cell models > RPE cell lines
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Rambhatla et al., 2002
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“A few studies found that disruption of this region did not abrogate the daily schedule of the number of OS phagosomes and concluded that cues for OS phagocytosis were intrinsic to the eye (Currie et al., 1978; Hollyfield and Basinger, 1978; LaVail and Ward, 1978; Tamai et al., 1978; Besharse and Dunis, 1983; Terman et al., 1993).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > The daily rhythm of disk membrane phagocytosis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Currie et al., 1978 source
- Not checked yetcites Hollyfield and Basinger, 1978
- Not checked yetcites LaVail and Ward, 1978
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Polarity and differentiation are not only influenced by the source of the cells (transformed, primary, stem cell-derived), but also by plating density (Adijanto and Philp, 2014; Toops et al., 2014), and the substrate on which the cells are grown (Opas, 1989).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE cell models > RPE cell cultures – basic standards
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“However, in his original paper, LaVail showed that blockage of the rat pineal gland with reserpine prevented the sudden increase in phagosome number that occurs after light onset (LaVail, 1976), suggesting some extraocular influence on circadian OS phagocytosis.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > The daily rhythm of disk membrane phagocytosis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites LaVail, 1976 source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The second method of ARPE-19 cell differentiation is the growth of cells on extracellular matrix-rich membranes such as porcine lens capsule (Turowski et al., 2004). Such cells have been reported to have improved phagocytosis and TER values reaching 200 Ω cm2.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE cell models > RPE cell lines
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Turowski et al., 2004 source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, a significant problem is that many published studies have used poor culture conditions, so that the cell cultures bear little resemblance to an epithelium, let alone the retinal pigment epithelium.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE cell models > RPE cell cultures – basic standards
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“An apical membrane, containing receptors such as Mer tyrosine kinase (MERTK) and αvβ5 integrin, an actin-rich apical domain, and a cell body, with an epithelial microtubule organization and organelle distribution, are all polarity characteristics of a differentiated RPE cell”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > RPE cell models for phagocytosis studies
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Studies utilizing RPE-J cells routinely require pulses that are several hours long, with one study noting that the binding phase requires 2 h and subsequent ingestion another 2–3 h (Finnemann et al., 1997).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > RPE cell models for phagocytosis studies
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Finnemann et al., 1997
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In a netcasting spider, which detects its prey by visual cues in dense rainforest at night, nearly all the phototransductive membrane is shed following dawn, and the rhabdomeres are then, essentially, entirely resynthesized at dusk (Blest, 1978).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Turnover of phototransductive membrane in arthropods – a comparative viewpoint
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Blest, 1978
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Early evidence suggested that different classes of phospholipids may be effective ligands for RPE phagocytic receptors (Effron et al., 1981).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Binding of OS membranes by the RPE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Effron et al., 1981
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“External PS on OSs is bound by milk fat globule E8 (MFGE8) which, in turn, serves as the ligand for αvβ5 integrin, residing in the apical RPE (Finnemann et al., 1997).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Binding of OS membranes by the RPE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Finnemann et al., 1997
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“However, human, rat, and mouse RPE cells in culture can phagocytose OS membrane isolated from retinas of mice, rats, cows or pigs, with no obvious differences among species, suggesting mechanistic robustness across species (Mazzoni et al., 2014)”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > RPE cell models for phagocytosis studies
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Mazzoni et al., 2014 source
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“MFGE8 protein levels in the retina are highest around light onset and decrease thereafter, thus coinciding with the phagocytic burst (Ruggiero and Finnemann, 2014).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Binding of OS membranes by the RPE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Ruggiero and Finnemann, 2014
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Primary rat RPE cultures exhibited a specificity for phagocytosis of isolated rat OSs; compared with red blood cells, levels of OS binding and OS ingestion were 250 and 970 times, respectively, greater (Mayerson and Hall, 1986).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > RPE cell models for phagocytosis studies
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Mayerson and Hall, 1986
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“phosphatidylserine (PS) has been widely studied as a phagocytic ligand; it is the classic ‘eat-me’ signal displayed by apoptotic cells and it is recognized by surface receptors on various phagocytic cells (Segawa and Nagata, 2015).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Binding of OS membranes by the RPE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Segawa and Nagata, 2015
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“- OS phagocytosis involves mechanisms that are specific for OSs.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > RPE cell models for phagocytosis studies
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“although, with highly differentiated cultures, there appears to be a latency period prior to binding, likely due to the extensive microvilli impeding the association of suspended OSs with RPE membrane receptors.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > RPE cell models for phagocytosis studies
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Analysis of two locust species that migrate at night found that the rhabdomeral cross-sectional area was 5-fold greater at night than during the day (Williams, 1982a, b), providing a concomitant increase in photoreceptor sensitivity at the expense of spatial resolution (Williams, 1983).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Turnover of phototransductive membrane in arthropods – a comparative viewpoint
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Williams, 1982a
- Not checked yetcites Williams, 1982b
- Not checked yetcites Williams, 1983 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In the central human retina, there are 33 photoreceptors associated with each RPE cell (Osterberg, 1935), and, in the center of a mouse retina, there are more than 200 photoreceptors for every RPE cell (Volland et al., 2015); the ratio decreases to ~12 in the periphery of the human retina and 100–120 in the periphery of a mouse retina (Volland et al., 2015).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Turnover of phototransductive membrane in arthropods – a comparative viewpoint
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Volland et al., 2015 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Most of the phototransductive membrane of nocturnal arthropods therefore lasts half a day, a considerably shorter time than the 10–50 days for the disk membranes of vertebrates (Young, 1967; Young and Bok, 1969).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Turnover of phototransductive membrane in arthropods – a comparative viewpoint
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Young, 1967 source
- Not checked yetcites Young and Bok, 1969
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In arthropods, phototransductive membrane is microvillar and forms rhabdomeres, which are comparable to the outer segments of vertebrate photoreceptors; the closely packed microvillar membrane provides an alternative way to form a structure that contains a high concentration of opsin and other phototransductive proteins.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Turnover of phototransductive membrane in arthropods – a comparative viewpoint
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“While each OS phagosome contains densely packed membranes, it represents only 10% of the OS in mammals, such as mouse and rat, and ~2% in the frog, Rana (Young, 1967; Young and Bok, 1969).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Turnover of phototransductive membrane in arthropods – a comparative viewpoint
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Young, 1967 source
- Not checked yetcites Young and Bok, 1969
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Arthropod photoreceptors typically degrade their own shed phototransductive membrane.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Turnover of phototransductive membrane in arthropods – a comparative viewpoint
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The timing of ingestion can be controlled by lowering the temperature at which cells are fed OSs to 17–20 °C (Hall and Abrams, 1987). This cooler temperature permits binding but blocks ingestion.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > RPE cell models for phagocytosis studies
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hall and Abrams, 1987
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Adult rat RPE expresses two different αv integrins, αvβ3 and αvβ5 (Finnemann and Rodriguez-Boulan, 1999), although only αvβ5 facilitates OS binding and localizes to the apical surface (Finnemann et al., 1997).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Binding of OS membranes by the RPE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Finnemann and Rodriguez-Boulan, 1999
- Not checked yetcites Finnemann et al., 1997
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“One such flippase, ATP8A2, has been localized to OS disk membranes and shown to translocate PS and, to a much lesser extent, phosphatidylethanolamine, implicating the enzyme in maintaining PS asymmetry in the OS (Coleman et al., 2009).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Binding of OS membranes by the RPE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Coleman et al., 2009 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The vast majority of phototransductive membrane is turned over each day in nocturnal arthropods.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Turnover of phototransductive membrane in arthropods – a comparative viewpoint
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“- MERTK is required for ingestion and is activated through αvβ5 integrin engagement and binding to Gas6/Protein S ligands.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Ingestion of OS membranes by the RPE
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“- TYRO3 and CD36 may be additional pathways mediating OS ingestion.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Ingestion of OS membranes by the RPE
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“- Release of a packet of disk membranes from the OS tip requires the RPE.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Ingestion of OS membranes by the RPE
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“OS phagocytosis is similarly arrhythmic, but not blocked in Mfge8−/− mice (Nandrot et al., 2007).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Binding of OS membranes by the RPE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Nandrot et al., 2007 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The lipid receptor, CD36, is not required for OS binding but is involved in phagosome engulfment, possibly as a signaling molecule (Finnemann and Silverstein, 2001), as antibodies against CD36 inhibited OS membrane ingestion by RPE cells (Ryeom et al., 1996).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Ingestion of OS membranes by the RPE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Finnemann and Silverstein, 2001
- Not checked yetcites Ryeom et al., 1996 source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“- Actin rearrangement is required for formation of the phagocytic cup and phagosome ingestion.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Ingestion of OS membranes by the RPE
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Although CD36 functions in OS membrane uptake during normal conditions (Ryeom et al., 1996), it also recognizes oxidized phospholipids, such as oxidized PS and oxidized phosphatidylcholine, and may be functionally advantageous under oxidative stress (e.g., from intense light exposure) as an aid for the MERTK pathway (Greenberg et al., 2006; Sun et al., 2006).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Ingestion of OS membranes by the RPE
What the sources say
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The interaction between αvβ5 and OS binding is specific as antibodies against the integrin block OS binding, but not the binding or uptake of latex beads (Finnemann et al., 1997).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Binding of OS membranes by the RPE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Finnemann et al., 1997
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In general, MERTK plays a key role in a variety of phagocytic events, such as microglial phagocytosis to mediate synaptic pruning (Chung et al., 2013), macrophage phagocytosis to remove apoptotic immune cells (Scott et al., 2001), and phagocytosis of apoptotic germ cells and the residual body from maturing sperm by Sertoli cells in the testes (Breucker et al., 1985).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Ingestion of OS membranes by the RPE
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Due to defective phagocytosis, and thus a blockage of OS disk membrane turnover, the structure of OSs in RCS rats begins to deteriorate, leading to a complete loss of OSs within 3 months of age.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Ingestion of OS membranes by the RPE
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In the absence of the β5 subunit, the daily rhythm of phagocytosis is lost and while OS ingestion is impaired, it is not absent (Nandrot et al., 2004), suggesting the existence of potential β5 compensatory mechanisms.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Binding of OS membranes by the RPE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Nandrot et al., 2004 source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“For example, inositol triphosphate (IP3) was identified as a secondary messenger downstream of MERTK, as RCS rats do no exhibit the characteristic increase in IP3 levels upon OS phagocytic challenge (Heth et al., 1995).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Ingestion of OS membranes by the RPE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Heth et al., 1995
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Furthermore, TYRO3 exhibited gene dosage-dependent suppressive effects on the degree of retinal degeneration observed in Mertk−/− animals, but did not prevent it entirely, suggesting that MERTK is still indispensable.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Ingestion of OS membranes by the RPE
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“FAK operates downstream of αvβ5 integrin and shows a diurnal pattern of phosphorylation similar to that of MERTK, peaking after light onset and diminishing as phagosome degradation proceeds (Nandrot et al., 2004).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Ingestion of OS membranes by the RPE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Nandrot et al., 2004 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The strength of adhesion peaked 3.5 h after light onset, i.e., past the phagocytic peak (Nandrot et al., 2006).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Binding of OS membranes by the RPE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Nandrot et al., 2006 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Engagement of the αvβ5 integrin initiates a signaling cascade that triggers OS ingestion, predominantly mediated by MERTK (Gal et al., 2000), a member of the Tyro-Axl-Mer (TAM) ingestion receptor family, that is present in the RPE apical membrane (Prasad et al., 2006).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Ingestion of OS membranes by the RPE
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Given the importance of MERTK to phagocytosis, mutations in the human MERTK gene can lead to retinitis pigmentosa, rod-cone dystrophies, and cone-rod dystrophies (Nandrot, 2014).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Ingestion of OS membranes by the RPE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Nandrot, 2014
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Although the extent of its requirement may differ among different tissues, it nevertheless plays a central role, directly or indirectly affecting the regulation of a wide variety of genes including those involved in cytoskeletal rearrangement and phagosome maturation (Shelby et al., 2013; Penberthy et al., 2017).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Ingestion of OS membranes by the RPE
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“β5−/− mice do not undergo retinal degeneration, but do demonstrate vision loss, as measured by electroretinograms (ERGs), from 6 months of age. They also accumulate fluorescent lipofuscin deposits, an inherent feature of the aging retina.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Binding of OS membranes by the RPE
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“the presence of the MERTK ingestion receptor (discussed in the section 3.5.1) limits OS binding via αvβ5 integrin, such that transient reduction of MERTK expression or use of cells lacking MERTK results in excessive OS binding (Nandrot et al., 2012).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Binding of OS membranes by the RPE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Nandrot et al., 2012 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As noted in section 3.5, however, OS ingestion does occur in these mice, suggesting that the basal level of phosphorylated MERTK that persists is sufficient to mediate phagocytosis.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Ingestion of OS membranes by the RPE
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“While deletion of either ligand alone does not affect retinal function in mice (Hall et al., 2005; Burstyn-Cohen et al., 2012), mice lacking both Gas6 and Protein S do develop moderate to severe retinal degeneration, demonstrating that at least one ligand is required for MERTK activation (Burstyn-Cohen et al., 2012).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Ingestion of OS membranes by the RPE
What the sources say
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Some mutant retinas also showed structures resembling drusen, and neovascularization of the RPE and photoreceptor layers (Jiang et al., 2015).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Degradation of OS phagosomes by the RPE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Jiang et al., 2015 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It appears, then, that OS phagosomes are highly motile, undergoing rapid bidirectional movements, while maintaining an overall bias towards the basal domain of the RPE.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Degradation of OS phagosomes by the RPE
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Upon OS feeding of cultured RPE, there is a brief burst of RAC1 activity together with colocalization of RAC1 with OS phagosomes.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Ingestion of OS membranes by the RPE
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“- OS phagosomes mature by migrating from the apical to basal side of the RPE, while undergoing gradual acidification and degradation by hydrolases.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Degradation of OS phagosomes by the RPE
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“PI3K is required for OS engulfment, possibly due to a role in promoting phagocytic cup formation, while AKT is not required for ingestion, and appears to restrict the size of the phagocytic cups and myosin-2 recruitment to the cup (Bulloj et al., 2013).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Ingestion of OS membranes by the RPE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Bulloj et al., 2013 source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Consistent with its function, ANXA2 localizes to the phagocytic cup and the early phagosome but dissociates from fully ingested phagosomes (in vivo and in vitro) (Law et al., 2009), mirroring the association kinetics of actin.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Ingestion of OS membranes by the RPE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Law et al., 2009 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“MERTK activation is neither required for nor affected by RAC1 activation and subsequent actin remodeling (Mao and Finnemann, 2012), consistent with the observation that actin is recruited to bound OS in RPE cells of the RCS rat (Chaitin and Hall, 1983b).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Ingestion of OS membranes by the RPE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Mao and Finnemann, 2012
- Not checked yetcites Chaitin and Hall, 1983b
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“RAC1 inhibition prevents actin recruitment to the bound OS particle and therefore, prevents ingestion.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Ingestion of OS membranes by the RPE
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“But, this, too, appears to be an event that could be regulated by the RPE, given that the frequency of stained OS tips was affected by the light exposure that the intact animal received prior to retinal dissection (while the OSs were still associated with the RPE) (Matsumoto and Besharse, 1985).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Ingestion of OS membranes by the RPE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Matsumoto and Besharse, 1985
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Annexin A2 (ANXA2) is a membrane-associated protein that regulates actin dynamics and binds signaling intermediates such as Ca2+, cholesterol-rich membranes, and phosphoinositides, serving as a direct or indirect linker between the phagosome membrane and actin cytoskeleton (Turowski et al., 2004; Law et al., 2009).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Ingestion of OS membranes by the RPE
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“This activity is dependent upon αvβ5 integrin engagement by MFGE8 and is essential for phagosome ingestion (Mao and Finnemann, 2012).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Ingestion of OS membranes by the RPE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Mao and Finnemann, 2012
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“An earlier report showed that freshly isolated frog retinas incubated in the low molecular weight dye, Lucifer Yellow, incorporated the dye into the distal tips of the OSs, suggesting that the opening of some distal disks to the extracellular space is an early step that leads to phagocytosis of the OS tip (Matsumoto and Besharse, 1985).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Ingestion of OS membranes by the RPE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Matsumoto and Besharse, 1985
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Demonstrated association with subunits of both kinesin-1 (Jiang et al., 2015) and cytoplasmic dynein-1 (Esteve-Rudd et al., 2018), which are plus- and minus-end directed microtubule motors, respectively, is consistent with bidirectional motility along microtubules.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Degradation of OS phagosomes by the RPE
What the sources say
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“- Phagosome acidification mediated by v-ATPase is required for protease activation.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Degradation of OS phagosomes by the RPE
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“it has been shown that the detachment of retinas in frog eyecups in vitro prevents the release of the distal disks from the region of detachment, demonstrating that OS membrane shedding does not occur in the absence of the RPE (Williams and Fisher, 1987).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Ingestion of OS membranes by the RPE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Williams and Fisher, 1987
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The entry of phagosomes into the cell body region is retarded in Myo7a-null mice, as is the overall rate of OS phagosome degradation (Gibbs et al., 2003).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Degradation of OS phagosomes by the RPE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Gibbs et al., 2003
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“RAC1 is a small GTP-binding protein in the Rho family of GTPases that destabilizes F-actin and facilitates its branching for the formation of the dynamic phagocytic cup.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Ingestion of OS membranes by the RPE
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“- The RPE cytoskeleton and its motor proteins support rapid bidirectional motility of OS phagosomes, as well as basal migration, and are essential for normal phagosome degradation.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Degradation of OS phagosomes by the RPE
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The mobilization of myosin-2 to the phagocytic cup was severely diminished in RPE cells from RCS rats, suggesting that while αvβ5 integrin converges on actin rearrangement pathways, MERTK signaling independently converges on the myosin force generation required for particle engulfment following phagocytic cup formation.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Ingestion of OS membranes by the RPE
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“OS phagosomes in the RPE of Klc1−/− mice (which lack a light chain of kinesin-1) have impaired motility and are degraded more slowly.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Degradation of OS phagosomes by the RPE
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“- The lysosomal aspartyl protease, cathepsin D, is essential for phagosome degradation, together with cysteine proteases such as cathepsin S.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Degradation of OS phagosomes by the RPE
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Older Klc1−/− mice develop AMD-like pathology, such as a slow loss of photoreceptor cells, complement hyperactivation, increased oxidative stress, and increased accumulation of neutral lipids such as lipoproteins and basal laminar deposits.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Degradation of OS phagosomes by the RPE
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, the RPE cytoskeleton and its associated motors are not only key for the overall basal movement of OS phagosomes in the RPE, but also for the dynamic motility of phagosomes that appears to underlie their degradation.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Degradation of OS phagosomes by the RPE
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“These mice express mutant human elongation of very long chain fatty acids (ELOVL)-4 protein that mislocalizes to the OS, producing OS phagosomes with altered content which, in turn, appear to be defective in their recruitment of motor linkers and motors, such as RAB7A and dynein (Esteve-Rudd et al., 2018).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Degradation of OS phagosomes by the RPE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Esteve-Rudd et al., 2018 source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In a second example, defective OS phagosome motility and degradation has been found in a mouse model of Stargardt macular degeneration (type 3) (Esteve-Rudd et al., 2018), leading to phagosome accumulation, RPE pathogenesis, and photoreceptor cell death (Karan et al., 2005).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Degradation of OS phagosomes by the RPE
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“- Phagosome degradation appears to involve a series of stages.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Degradation of OS phagosomes by the RPE
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Cells could be made to increase or decrease their phagocytic capacity by inhibiting or activating Rho kinase, which induced circumferential actin rearrangement or stress fiber formation, respectively.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Ingestion of OS membranes by the RPE
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Similarly, Anxa2−/− mice show phagosome accumulation in the apical microvilli (Law et al., 2009), an observation not noted in wild type mice, strongly suggesting delayed phagosome ingestion in the absence of ANXA2.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Ingestion of OS membranes by the RPE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Law et al., 2009 source
boostedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In a Stargardt macular degeneration type 3 mouse model, mutant ELOVL4 mislocalizes from the endoplasmic reticulum to the photoreceptor OSs. When these mutant OSs were fed to wild-type primary mouse RPE cells, the resulting OS phagosomes were found to associate with excessive RAB7A, and have affected motor protein recruitment and impaired motility, which likely underlies their observed slower”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Degradation of OS phagosomes by the RPE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Esteve-Rudd et al., 2018 source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“For example, the monoclonal antibody, 1D4, whose epitope corresponds to the C-terminus of rod opsin (Molday and MacKenzie, 1983), primarily detects phagosomes in the apical, but not basal RPE, indicative of early phagosomes (Law et al., 2009; Esteve-Rudd et al., 2014; Wavre-Shapton et al., 2014).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Degradation of OS phagosomes by the RPE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Molday and MacKenzie, 1983
- Not checked yetcites Law et al., 2009 source
- Not checked yetcites Esteve-Rudd et al., 2014
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The acidification is mediated by the vacuolar type H+-ATPase (v-ATPase), and is required for the proper functioning of lysosomal proteases.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Degradation of OS phagosomes by the RPE
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A recent report has shown that deficient LAMP2 results in retarded OS phagosome degradation, and the accumulation of AMD-like deposits (Notomi et al., 2019).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Degradation of OS phagosomes by the RPE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Notomi et al., 2019 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Phagosomal RAB7 and subsequent LAMP1 acquisition were compromised in the cells treated with REP1 siRNA, thereby leading to fewer fusion events with lysosomes, which, coupled with defects in phagosomal acidification, resulted in slower phagosome clearance (Gordiyenko et al., 2010).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Degradation of OS phagosomes by the RPE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Gordiyenko et al., 2010 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The presence of RAB5 and early endosome antigen 1 (EEA1) indicate interactions with early endosomes, whereas RAB7 is a marker for late endosomes, and the lysosome-associated membrane proteins, LAMP1 and LAMP2, are markers for lysosomes.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Degradation of OS phagosomes by the RPE
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“These mice display features reminiscent of geographic atrophy in AMD, such as photoreceptor cell death, diminished ERG responses, accumulation of phagocytic material in the RPE, basal laminar and linear deposits, RPE pigmentary changes, and RPE cell atrophy and proliferation.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Degradation of OS phagosomes by the RPE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Rakoczy et al., 2002 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Similarly, melanoregulin (MREG), a small, highly-charged protein that localizes to lysosomes (Frost et al., 2013), is important for cathepsin D maturation.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Degradation of OS phagosomes by the RPE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Frost et al., 2013 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Indeed, RPE from βA3/A1-crystallin knockout mice have decreased v-ATPase activity, elevated lysosomal pH, and decreased cathepsin D activity.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Degradation of OS phagosomes by the RPE
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Additionally, the membrane organizer, caveolin-1, is recruited to maturing phagolysosomes and appears to be important for regulating lysosomal acidification and cathepsin D enzyme activity; increasing or decreasing caveolin-1 protein levels in vitro accelerated or decelerated phagosome degradation, respectively (Sethna et al., 2016), although the underlying mechanism remains unclear.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Degradation of OS phagosomes by the RPE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Sethna et al., 2016 source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Intravitreal injection of bafilomycin, a v-ATPase inhibitor, resulted in the accumulation of large phagolysosomes containing cathepsin D and with preserved opsin antigenicity, demonstrating that enzyme acquisition alone was not sufficient for opsin degradation (Deguchi et al., 1994).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Degradation of OS phagosomes by the RPE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Deguchi et al., 1994
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Alterations in endolysosomal marker association would likely indicate a defect in a particular maturation stage, which could contribute to inefficient OS phagosome degradation.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Degradation of OS phagosomes by the RPE
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Although lack of REP1 function appears to be compensated by REP2 activity in most tissues, the outer retina including the RPE requires REP1.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Degradation of OS phagosomes by the RPE
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Moreover, human iPSC-derived RPE cells from choroideremia patients (Duong et al., 2018), and human fetal primary RPE cells, treated with REP1 siRNA (Gordiyenko et al., 2010), both demonstrate delayed OS phagosome clearance.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Degradation of OS phagosomes by the RPE
What the sources say
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“‘Bridge-like structures’ were described between phagosomes and organelles thought to be lysosomes in the rat RPE as early as 30 min after light onset (Bosch et al., 1993).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Degradation of OS phagosomes by the RPE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Bosch et al., 1993 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Moreover, these authors also demonstrate lysosome alkalinization in the albino Abca4−/− mouse (Liu et al., 2008) and have recently shown that restoration of lysosomal pH with P2Y12 receptor antagonist prevents photoreceptor loss in these mice (Lu et al., 2019).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Degradation of OS phagosomes by the RPE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Liu et al., 2008 source
- Not checked yetcites Lu et al., 2019
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“RAB GTPases mediate organelle trafficking and fusion, and, in doing so, facilitate interactions between phagosomes and endosomes.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Degradation of OS phagosomes by the RPE
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Cathepsin D was the first lysosomal protease specifically investigated in the RPE.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Degradation of OS phagosomes by the RPE
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These phagosomes also possessed negligible cathepsin D (lysosomal protease) staining, suggesting that they had not yet encountered lysosomes and that loss of the 1D4 epitope occurred during a prelysosomal and pre-migratory processing step.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Degradation of OS phagosomes by the RPE
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“An intermediate step may exist between 1D4 epitope loss and cathepsin D acquisition, as EM studies revealed fewer associated cathepsin D particles in 1D4-negative phagosomes that retained a distinct disk structure than in phagolysosomes (Wavre-Shapton et al., 2014).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Degradation of OS phagosomes by the RPE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Wavre-Shapton et al., 2014
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In addition, LC3B-II recruitment occurs on single-membraned phagosomes, unlike the double-membraned autophagosomes in classical autophagy (Frost et al., 2015; Martinez et al., 2015; Klionsky et al., 2016).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Intersection of phagocytosis with autophagy: LC3-associated phagocytosis > LC3-associated phagocytosis (LAP)
What the sources say
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Cathepsin L has been detected at the transcript level in mouse RPE and can be upregulated in response to hyperoxia (Alizadeh et al., 2006).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Degradation of OS phagosomes by the RPE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Alizadeh et al., 2006 source
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Loss of LC3B (Dhingra et al., 2018) results in age-dependent deposition of lipid-rich structures between the RPE and choroid, an increase in lipid peroxidation adducts, and increases in the pro-inflammatory lipid 7-ketocholesterol.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Intersection of phagocytosis with autophagy: LC3-associated phagocytosis > LC3-associated phagocytosis in OS phagosome clearance
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Dhingra et al., 2018 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In contrast, the Lc3b−/− mouse shows a decrease in LC3-mediated OS phagosome clearance, with no change in classical autophagy (Dhingra et al., 2018).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Intersection of phagocytosis with autophagy: LC3-associated phagocytosis > LC3-associated phagocytosis in OS phagosome clearance
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Dhingra et al., 2018 source
plaindirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Cysteine protease inhibition of RPE cells in vivo, through a single intravitreal injection, has been shown to increase the accumulation of phagosomes and autofluorescent material (Ivy et al., 1989; Katz and Shanker, 1989; Okubo et al., 2000); although, the inhibition is relieved within a week, and phagosome counts in the RPE return to near control levels (Okubo et al., 2000).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Degradation of OS phagosomes by the RPE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Okubo et al., 2000
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is distinguished from classical phagocytosis by the recruitment of lipidated LC3B (LC3B-II) to phagosomes.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Intersection of phagocytosis with autophagy: LC3-associated phagocytosis > LC3-associated phagocytosis (LAP)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“LAP is an autophagosome-independent process (Frost et al., 2015; Martinez et al., 2015; Klionsky et al., 2016), and does not require the upstream components needed for initiating or regulating classical autophagy.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Intersection of phagocytosis with autophagy: LC3-associated phagocytosis > LC3-associated phagocytosis (LAP)
What the sources say
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The Atg5ΔRPE mouse also exhibits elevated levels of oxidatively-modified lipids, proteins, and DNA with occasional RPE hypertrophy (Zhang et al., 2017).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Intersection of phagocytosis with autophagy: LC3-associated phagocytosis > LC3-associated phagocytosis in OS phagosome clearance
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Zhang et al., 2017 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The Lc3b−/− mouse exhibits normal starvation-induced autophagy and delayed phagosome maturation.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Intersection of phagocytosis with autophagy: LC3-associated phagocytosis > LC3-associated phagocytosis in OS phagosome clearance
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Phagosome motility is, in turn, determined by the organization of the cell’s actin and microtubule cytoskeleton.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Intersection of phagocytosis with autophagy: LC3-associated phagocytosis > LC3-associated phagocytosis in OS phagosome clearance
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Cathepsin B has also been identified in the mouse (Alizadeh et al., 2006; Ahuja et al., 2008), bovine (Fröhlich and Klessen, 2001), and human (Hoppe et al., 2004b) RPE, although there appears to be some variation in the level of protein expression, at least in RPE from individual rats (Wassélius et al., 2003).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Degradation of OS phagosomes by the RPE
What the sources say
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The recruitment of LC3B to maturing phagosomes requires proteins involved in classical autophagy; however, LAP is distinct from classical autophagy both in initiation and function.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Intersection of phagocytosis with autophagy: LC3-associated phagocytosis
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Phospholipase A activity in the RPE was reported in the early 1980s (Zimmerman et al., 1983).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Phagocytosis of OS disk membranes > Degradation of OS phagosomes by the RPE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Zimmerman et al., 1983 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the Atg5ΔRPE mouse, rod and cone photoreceptor functions are diminished, although no cell loss is apparent.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Intersection of phagocytosis with autophagy: LC3-associated phagocytosis > LC3-associated phagocytosis in OS phagosome clearance
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“LAP was first identified about a decade ago in studies on phagocytosis of pathogens and dead cells by immune cells (Sanjuan et al., 2007; Martinez et al., 2011) (Fig. 9).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Intersection of phagocytosis with autophagy: LC3-associated phagocytosis > LC3-associated phagocytosis (LAP)
What the sources say
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“ULK recruits the ATG5-ATG12-ATG16L1 complex to mediate conjugation of phosphatidylethanolamine to LC3B.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Classical autophagy > Molecular machinery and regulation of classical autophagy
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“mTOR Complex 1 (mTORC1), which includes mTOR, regulatory-associated protein of mTOR (RAPTOR), and mammalian lethal with SEC13 protein 8 (MLST8), negatively regulates autophagy by two distinct mechanisms in nutrient-replete or stress-free conditions.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Classical autophagy > Molecular machinery and regulation of classical autophagy
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Impaired autophagy is a feature of RPE from AMD donor tissue and multiple models of inherited retinal degenerations.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Classical autophagy
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The resulting pro-inflammatory microenvironment leads to recruitment of microglia and contributes to RPE hypertrophy and loss of function (decreased c-wave).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Intersection of phagocytosis with autophagy: LC3-associated phagocytosis > LC3-associated phagocytosis in OS phagosome clearance
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“First, whereas non-polarized RPE respond to “stereotypical” autophagy inducers such as serum starvation, well-polarized terminally differentiated primary RPE cultures do not (Toops et al., 2015).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Classical autophagy > RPE cell models to study autophagy
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Toops et al., 2015 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These receptors also have LC3-interacting regions (LIRs) that bind LC3 at the nascent autophagosome, resulting in ubiquitinated cargo being enclosed within the growing autophagosome.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Classical autophagy > Molecular machinery and regulation of classical autophagy
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“At the final step, LC3B-II promotes autophagosome closure after dissociation of ATG proteins.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Classical autophagy > Molecular machinery and regulation of classical autophagy
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“p62 and other autophagic receptors bind ubiquitinated proteins and organelles tagged for removal.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Classical autophagy > Molecular machinery and regulation of classical autophagy
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Thus, Rubicon appears to function in balancing classical autophagy and LAP, by committing a cell to LAP while inhibiting classical autophagy (Wong et al., 2018).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Intersection of phagocytosis with autophagy: LC3-associated phagocytosis > LC3-associated phagocytosis in OS phagosome clearance
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Wong et al., 2018 source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Classical autophagy occurs at a basal, constitutive level in all eukaryotic cells, and is modulated by intrinsic and extrinsic stimuli.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Classical autophagy > Molecular machinery and regulation of classical autophagy
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Classical autophagy occurs at a basal, constitutive level in all eukaryotic cells.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“On the other hand, basal autophagy in the RPE is not regulated by light exposure, but is triggered by OS disk membrane phagocytosis.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Classical autophagy > Regulation of autophagy in the RPE
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“At the nascent autophagosome, ATG9 delivers vesicles that provide membrane for autophagosome growth.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Classical autophagy > Molecular machinery and regulation of classical autophagy
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Loss of MREG, an LC3B binding partner contributes to a delay in phagosome maturation (Damek-Poprawa et al., 2009) and lysosomal exocytosis, as well as basal laminar thickening in older mice (Frost et al., 2013).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Intersection of phagocytosis with autophagy: LC3-associated phagocytosis > LC3-associated phagocytosis in OS phagosome clearance
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There are three principal routes of autophagy that differ primarily in the mechanism of cargo delivery to lysosomes: microautophagy, macroautophagy, and chaperone-mediated autophagy.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Classical autophagy
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Fusion of autophagosomes with lysosomes requires microtubule-based transport, tethering factors, and SNARE (soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein [SNAP] receptor) proteins (Leidal et al., 2018; Levine and Kroemer, 2019).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Classical autophagy > Molecular machinery and regulation of classical autophagy
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Second, polarized primary RPE do not upregulate autophagy in response to the non-specific mTOR inhibitor rapamycin, but respond to the specific mTORC1 inhibitor Torin-1 (Toops et al., 2015).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Classical autophagy > RPE cell models to study autophagy
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Toops et al., 2015 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Activation of the ULK complex (ULK1-ATG13-RB1CC1/FIP200) in turn activates the VPS34 complex (UVRAG-Beclin-VPS34-ATG14) to initiate biogenesis of the double-membraned autophagosome.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Classical autophagy > Molecular machinery and regulation of classical autophagy
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“First, it phosphorylates and inactivates ULK1 and ULK2 (unc-51-like kinases 1 & 2).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Classical autophagy > Molecular machinery and regulation of classical autophagy
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The observation that Rubicon levels in the RPE are elevated at light onset (Muniz-Feliciano et al., 2017) suggests that synchronized OS phagocytosis is required for Rubicon activation.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Intersection of phagocytosis with autophagy: LC3-associated phagocytosis > LC3-associated phagocytosis in OS phagosome clearance
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Muniz-Feliciano et al., 2017 source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In autophagy, damaged organelles (e.g., mitochondria, lysosomes, peroxisomes) and cellular material (e.g., proteins, lipids, nucleic acids) are enclosed in a double-membraned autophagosome and delivered to lysosomes for degradation (Leidal et al., 2018; Levine and Kroemer, 2019).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Classical autophagy
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Conversion of non-lipidated LC3B–I to lipidated LC3B-II is necessary for its binding to the membrane and is regulated by ATG4, ATG7, and ATG10.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Classical autophagy > Molecular machinery and regulation of classical autophagy
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Last, the relevance of these in vitro studies to RPE in vivo is unclear since there is no evidence that post-mitotic RPE express EGFR on the apical cell surface.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Intersection of phagocytosis with autophagy: LC3-associated phagocytosis > LC3-associated phagocytosis in OS phagosome clearance
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“LC3B-II recruitment is essential for autophagosome elongation and for recruitment of cargo to the autophagosome.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Classical autophagy > Molecular machinery and regulation of classical autophagy
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As discussed below, a growing body of evidence suggests that autophagy is crucial for maintaining RPE homeostasis, and impaired autophagy has been implicated in a plethora of retinal degenerations.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Classical autophagy
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Based on current knowledge, it appears that there are two peaks of autophagy induction in response to OS membrane phagocytosis: in 6-month-old C57BL/6J mice RPE, the phagocytic peak occurs 30 min after light onset with a subsequent peak in LC3B-II and ATG5-ATG12 expression 2 h after light onset (Frost et al., 2015).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Classical autophagy > Regulation of autophagy in the RPE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Frost et al., 2015 source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“This was accompanied by the accumulation of p62/SQSTM1, damaged mitochondria, and lipid droplets with increased autofluorescence in the RPE, all indicators of impaired autophagic flux.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Classical autophagy > Regulation of autophagy in the RPE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Yao et al., 2015 source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Autophagy is known to be upregulated in the RPE in response to a variety of stressors (see below); however, it has become increasingly clear that the ability of a particular stimulus to induce autophagy, and the extent of induction, both depend on the differentiation status of the RPE.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Classical autophagy > RPE cell models to study autophagy
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Starvation and other cellular stressors inhibit mTOR, which relieves the block on ULK1 and 2 to initiate autophagy, and allows nuclear translocation of TFEB/E3 to induce the transcription of lysosomal and autophagy genes.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Classical autophagy > Molecular machinery and regulation of classical autophagy
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“HDAC6 also regulates the autophagy-dependent clearance of defective mitochondria (Seigneurin-Berny et al., 2001), likely compromising lipid metabolism in Abca4−/− mice (discussed in more detail section 6).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Classical autophagy > Mechanisms underlying autophagic defects in retinal diseases
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Seigneurin-Berny et al., 2001 source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Dynamic microtubules (marked by tyrosination) are required for efficient transport of autophagosomes, whereas stable microtubules (marked by acetylation) hinder autophagosome trafficking (Toops et al., 2015; Mohan et al., 2019).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Classical autophagy > Mechanisms underlying autophagic defects in retinal diseases
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Defective autophagy has been implicated in intractable age-related neurodegenerative diseases including Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases (Nixon, 2013).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Classical autophagy > Autophagy in models of age-related macular degeneration
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Nixon, 2013 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These receptors have LIRs, which ensures the delivery of damaged mitochondria to autophagosomes.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Classical autophagy > Autophagy in models of age-related macular degeneration
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Live-cell imaging of RPE with lipofuscin bisretinoids showed significantly hindered autophagosome transport and impaired fusion with lysosomes.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Classical autophagy > Mechanisms underlying autophagic defects in retinal diseases
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The antidepressant desipramine, which inhibits ASMase, decreased ceramide, and restored autophagosome trafficking and autophagic flux in Abca4−/− RPE.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Classical autophagy > Mechanisms underlying autophagic defects in retinal diseases
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Impaired autophagy is accompanied by defects in other organelles/functions such as delayed phagosome maturation (Bietti’s, Batten, SLO (Wavre-Shapton et al., 2015; Hata et al., 2018; Ramachandra Rao et al., 2018)), lysosomal dysfunction (Stargardt, Batten, Bietti’s (Liu et al., 2008; Wavre-Shapton et al., 2015; Tan et al., 2016; Hata et al., 2018)), and endosomal abnormalities (Stargardt (Kaur et”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Classical autophagy > Autophagy in models of inherited retinal degenerations
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The ULK complex is upstream of ATG5 and ATG7 in the autophagy cascade, which might explain why mice, lacking RB1CC1 in the RPE, have a more severe phenotype compared to those lacking Atg5 or Atg7.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Classical autophagy > Regulation of autophagy in the RPE
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In Abca4−/− RPE, both autophagosome biogenesis and autophagic flux are inhibited (Toops et al., 2015); however, in Batten, Bietti’s, and SLO diseases, autophagic defects manifest as an accumulation of LC3-positive autophagosomes and increased p62, suggestive of a block in autophagosome-lysosome fusion.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Classical autophagy > Autophagy in models of inherited retinal degenerations
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Toops et al., 2015 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“During mitophagy, mitochondria destined for degradation are tagged with ubiquitin, which is recognized by autophagy receptors such as p62 and optineurin.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Classical autophagy > Autophagy in models of age-related macular degeneration
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Decreased autophagy led to a secondary degeneration of photoreceptors, loss of scotopic and photopic vision, subretinal inflammation (microglial activation, complement activation), and sub-RPE accumulation of oxidative stress markers in 8-month-old mice.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Classical autophagy > Regulation of autophagy in the RPE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Yao et al., 2015 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“SNAREs are critical components of cellular fusion machinery.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Classical autophagy > Mechanisms underlying autophagic defects in retinal diseases
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The presence of mitochondrial fragments confirms studies showing increased mitochondrial DNA damage (Fisher and Ferrington, 2018) in AMD donor RPE, and likely indicates a failure of mitophagy, a selective autophagic mechanism for removing damaged mitochondria (Pickles et al., 2018).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Classical autophagy > Autophagy in models of age-related macular degeneration
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Fisher and Ferrington, 2018
- Not checked yetcites Pickles et al., 2018 source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“in Abca4−/− RPE and in RPE from aged human donors, lipofuscin bisretinoids drive the accumulation of ceramide - a cone-shaped lipid that promotes spontaneous negative curvature and inward budding - on the apical plasma membrane. This results in the formation of enlarged early endosomes from the apical surface, and these endosomes act as conduits for the entry of complement C3, as discussed above”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE organelles > Early and recycling endosomes
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kaur et al., 2018 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“in later stages of AMD, increased C3 expression in the retina would lead to increased generation of C3a fragments within the RPE, and consequently, activate mTOR chronically.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Classical autophagy > Mechanisms underlying autophagic defects in retinal diseases
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The endosomal system can be co-opted to make the RPE susceptible to viruses and complement attack.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE organelles > Early and recycling endosomes
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“lysosomes in the RPE perform various roles; in addition to their degradative functions, they participate in calcium signaling and membrane repair - mechanisms that are critical for maintaining RPE health and integrity (Liu et al., 2008; Tan et al., 2016).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE organelles
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Sema4A mutant proteins that are associated with human disease are mislocalized in the RPE, leading to defective endosomal sorting of prosaposins and CRALBP, which makes the photoreceptors susceptible to degeneration (Nojima et al., 2013).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE organelles > Early and recycling endosomes
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Nojima et al., 2013 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Recent studies show that ceramide is increased in human brains as a function of age (Park et al., 2018) and in Alzheimer’s disease (Filippov et al., 2012), suggesting that a common mechanism could drive age-related early endosome defects in neurons and the RPE.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE organelles > Early and recycling endosomes
What the sources say
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“These include syntaxin-17 on autophagosomes and vesicle-associated membrane protein (VAMP) 7/8 on endolysosomal membranes (Levine and Kroemer, 2019).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Classical autophagy > Mechanisms underlying autophagic defects in retinal diseases
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Levine and Kroemer, 2019 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In fish RPE, myosin-7a appears to be responsible for the dispersion of melanosomes along the apical processes in the light (McNeil et al., 2004), whereas, in the dark, retrograde movement out of the apical processes appears to require myosin-2 (Barsoum and King-Smith, 2007).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE organelles > Melanosomes
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites McNeil et al., 2004 source
- Not checked yetcites Barsoum and King-Smith, 2007
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Intracellular C3a is almost undetectable in healthy RPE, likely due to efficient recycling or degradation; on the other hand, increased uptake of C3 in Abca4−/− RPE from the extracellular milieu into enlarged early endosomes (discussed in detail below) enables the generation of intracellular C3a, and consequently, sustained activation of mTOR (Kaur et al., 2018).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Classical autophagy > Mechanisms underlying autophagic defects in retinal diseases
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kaur et al., 2018 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Early and recycling endosomes participate in RPE-photoreceptor communication and photoreceptor maintenance.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE organelles > Early and recycling endosomes
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“peroxisomes, which provide a link between OS membrane phagocytosis and RPE metabolism due to β-oxidation of the very long chain fatty acids in the ingested OS membranes.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE organelles
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the absence of a tapetum, the RPE contains melanosomes, which have a variety of potential functions. A clear role for melanosomes in the RPE (as well as melanocytes of the skin) is in the screening of light.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE organelles > Melanosomes
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A highly differentiated, tightly packed RPE monolayer is especially important for studies on polarized secretion of exosomes. Poorly polarized, loosely packed, or sparsely plated cells would allow intermixing of apical and basolateral media, and make any conclusions about directional exosome secretion meaningless (Klingeborn et al., 2017a).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE organelles > RPE cell models to study the organization and function of organelles
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Klingeborn et al., 2017a
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In aging and early AMD, mTOR is well-regulated, and autophagosome biogenesis is not heavily impacted;”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Classical autophagy > Mechanisms underlying autophagic defects in retinal diseases
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“RPE melanosomes contain proteases (Azarian et al., 2006), including cathepsin D, a major enzyme in the degradation of OS proteins (Hayasaka et al., 1975), and have been observed to fuse with phagosomes (e.g. Schraermeyer et al., 1999).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE organelles > Melanosomes
What the sources say
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The mechanism points to an intriguing link between the complement pathway and autophagy in the RPE, and has parallels with the immune system: in T-cells, C3 is internalized via early endosomes and cleaved intracellularly into active C3a and C3b fragments.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Classical autophagy > Mechanisms underlying autophagic defects in retinal diseases
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Although more muted, melanosomes have been observed to move into the RPE apical processes in response to light onset (Futter et al., 2004).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE organelles > Melanosomes
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Futter et al., 2004 source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Abnormally enlarged early endosomes are seen in models of macular degeneration, suggesting a common etiology with other neurodegenerations such as Alzheimer’s disease.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE organelles > Early and recycling endosomes
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“myosin-7a associates with RPE melanosomes by binding to myosin-7a- and Rab-interacting protein (MYRIP) (El-Amraoui et al., 2002), which in turn binds to RAB27A on the melanosome surface (Futter et al., 2004; Gibbs et al., 2004; Kuroda and Fukuda, 2005; Klomp et al., 2007)”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE organelles > Melanosomes
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The resulting increase in RPE glycolytic flux decreases the amount of glucose available to photoreceptors, and could contribute to photoreceptor degeneration.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Classical autophagy > Mechanisms underlying autophagic defects in retinal diseases
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A tapetum reflects light back through the photoreceptors (effecting “eyeshine” when light is shone in the eye at night), in contrast to the absorption of light by melanosomes. Tapeta are found among vertebrates and invertebrates. They increase light absorption (light not absorbed by the photoreceptors on the first pass through may be absorbed on the second pass through) and are thus found in an”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE organelles > Melanosomes
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In cultures of mouse and human RPE cells, lack of myosin-7a results in the inability to sequester melanosomes in the actin-rich apical domain; instead the melanosomes undergo more rapid bidirectional movements along microtubules in the cell body (Gibbs et al., 2004, 2010; Lopes et al., 2007; Jiang et al., 2019).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE organelles > Melanosomes
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although pigmentation is a common characteristic of the RPE, it is not a universal one, as the RPE in some animals lacks melanosomes either completely or partially to make way for a tapetum lucidum.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE organelles > Melanosomes
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“RPE lacking NHE8 have abnormally small recycling endosomes, and mice with an RPE-specific deletion of Slc9a8 show widespread retinal and RPE degeneration (Jadeja et al., 2015; Xia et al., 2015, 2018).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE organelles > Early and recycling endosomes
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“C3a activates mTOR, which is essential for driving metabolic reprogramming and cell fate decisions (Hess and Kemper, 2016).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Classical autophagy > Mechanisms underlying autophagic defects in retinal diseases
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hess and Kemper, 2016
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Lysosomal hydrolases are activated by the highly acidic luminal pH (4.5–5.0), which is maintained by the v-ATPase on lysosomal membranes (Mindell, 2012).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE organelles > Late endosomes and lysosomes in the RPE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Mindell, 2012 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Studies in HeLa cells show that the position of lysosomes within the cell determines their luminal pH; peripheral lysosomes are less acidic than those in the perinuclear region. This is because peripheral lysosomes have less RAB7, which leads to decreased recruitment of the RAB7 effector RILP (RAB-interacting lysosomal protein). RILP, in turn, is responsible for recruiting specific subunits of the”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE organelles > Late endosomes and lysosomes in the RPE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Johnson et al., 2016 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Lysosomes in cultured human RPE from AMD donors were found to be enlarged and annular; however, whether this abnormal lysosome morphology is associated with decreased hydrolytic function is not yet known (Golestaneh et al., 2017).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE organelles > Late endosomes and lysosomes in the RPE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Golestaneh et al., 2017 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These seemingly contradictory findings could potentially be explained by lysosomal heterogeneity, i.e., all lysosomes are not created equal, and exhibit significant structural and functional differences.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE organelles > Late endosomes and lysosomes in the RPE
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The studies discussed above add to the growing body of evidence that lysosomes perform multiple functions in the RPE – they help degrade phagocytosed and cellular material, act as signaling platforms, and maintain membrane integrity.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE organelles > Late endosomes and lysosomes in the RPE
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In polarized RPE, calcium ionophores induce exocytosis at both the apical and basolateral domains (Xu et al., 2012), because syntaxin 4 is non-polar in the RPE (Low et al., 2002). This is in contrast to Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells where basolateral localization of syntaxin 4 (Low et al., 1996) restricts lysosome exocytosis to the basolateral domain (Xu et al., 2012).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE organelles > Late endosomes and lysosomes in the RPE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Xu et al., 2012
- Not checked yetcites Low et al., 2002 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Alternative splicing of LAMP2 results in three isoforms, LAMP2a, LAMP2b, and LAMP2c. Patients with mutant LAMP2b and LAMP2c have milder phenotypes, whereas those with LAMP2a present with severe disease (Thiadens et al., 2012).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE organelles > Late endosomes and lysosomes in the RPE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Thiadens et al., 2012 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Lysosome exocytosis requires a population of peripheral lysosomes in close proximity to the plasma membrane that can be rapidly deployed for fusion in response to membrane damage. Long-range microtubule-mediated transport is required for peripheral localization of lysosomes and local depolymerization of the actin cytoskeleton is essential for the fusion of membrane proximal lysosomes with the cell”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE organelles > Late endosomes and lysosomes in the RPE
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Peroxisomes are numerous within the RPE and often found adjacent to mitochondria, which is not surprising given the essential role of peroxisomes in β-oxidation of very long chain fatty acids (VLCFA) and the lipid catabolic demands placed on the RPE by a daily influx of VLCFA via phagocytic uptake and degradation of OS disk membranes.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE organelles > Peroxisome biogenesis and implications for RPE health
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Fusion of lysosomes with the plasma membrane is a calcium-dependent process crucial for membrane repair, limiting pathogen entry, and clearing cellular debris (Idone et al., 2008).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE organelles > Late endosomes and lysosomes in the RPE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Idone et al., 2008 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Peroxisome number, but not necessarily function, is elevated during ageing.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE organelles > Peroxisome biogenesis and implications for RPE health
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Rodent and fruit fly models of NPC disease have extensive cholesterol accumulation in the RPE and retinal neurons, increased lipofuscin, and progressive photoreceptor degeneration (Phillips et al., 2008; Claudepierre et al., 2010).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE organelles > Late endosomes and lysosomes in the RPE
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Patients with Danon disease have increased fundus autofluorescence and abnormal full-field ERGs, indicative of decreased lysosome function and loss of RPE function (Thompson et al., 2016).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE organelles > Late endosomes and lysosomes in the RPE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Thompson et al., 2016 source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Surprisingly, despite diurnal peaks in phagocytosis and therefore peaks in substrate availability for β-oxidation, peroxisome numbers are stable throughout the day in mouse RPE. However, activity of the peroxisome antioxidant catalase is elevated during the early morning hours when numbers of ingested phagosomes are highest, suggesting enzyme induction (Daniele et al., 2019).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE organelles > Peroxisome biogenesis and implications for RPE health
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Daniele et al., 2019 source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The RPE is one of few epithelia that do not express the clathrin adaptor protein AP-1B that is required for basolateral localization of both transferrin receptor and CAR. In the absence of AP-1B, these proteins are initially sorted to the basolateral membrane from the Golgi network, but upon endocytosis, are transcytosed to the apical domain instead of being recycled back to the basolateral”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE organelles > Early and recycling endosomes
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In RPE with defective microtubule transport such as in the Abca4−/− mouse, lysosomes are sequestered in the perinuclear region. The resulting decrease in membrane proximal lysosomes prevents membrane repair after complement attack, and makes the RPE susceptible to mitochondrial damage (Tan et al., 2016).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE organelles > Late endosomes and lysosomes in the RPE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Tan et al., 2016 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Late endosomes mature into lysosomes, which are the major degradative compartments in the cell.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE organelles > Late endosomes and lysosomes in the RPE
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The protein, lipid, and RNA (mRNA and microRNA) content, stimulus for secretion, and machinery involved in exosome biogenesis and release are all cell type-dependent (for an in-depth discussion of our current understanding of exosome biology see van Niel et al., 2018).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE organelles > Late endosomes and lysosomes in the RPE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites van Niel et al., 2018 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In normal RPE, complement attack accelerates CD59 recycling to the apical membrane to prevent MAC assembly. However, in the Abca4−/− mouse model of Stargardt disease, increased cholesterol prevents CD59 recycling in response to complement, and reroutes it to lysosomes. The resultant increase in MAC formation leads to increased intracellular calcium, mitochondrial fragmentation, and oxidative”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE organelles > Early and recycling endosomes
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Tan et al., 2016 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“a common theme that has emerged from these studies suggests that RPE-derived exosomes participate in inflammatory signaling and in immune modulation. Exosomes released by healthy RPE serve to decrease inflammation and downregulate the immune response, whereas exosomes released by stressed RPE promote inflammation and activate immune cells (Biasutto et al., 2013; Gangalum et al., 2016; Knickelbein”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE organelles > Late endosomes and lysosomes in the RPE
What the sources say
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Circadian clearance of OS phagosomes by the RPE occurs normally in this model, suggesting that cathepsin D activity is not affected (Kaur et al., 2018).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE organelles > Late endosomes and lysosomes in the RPE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kaur et al., 2018 source
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Exosomes transfer proteins, lipids, and genetic material between cells, suggesting that they can participate in epithelial polarity, development, and tissue morphogenesis (Lakkaraju and Rodriguez-Boulan, 2008).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE organelles > Late endosomes and lysosomes in the RPE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lakkaraju and Rodriguez-Boulan, 2008
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Although cardiomyopathy is the most common symptom of Danon disease, ~70% of patients have retinal abnormalities. These include chorioretinal atrophy and cone-rod dystrophy.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE organelles > Late endosomes and lysosomes in the RPE
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Lysosomes in the RPE are likely heterogeneous, with location determining the structure, content, and therefore function.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE organelles > Late endosomes and lysosomes in the RPE
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Lysosome exocytosis also prevents intracellular calcium increase and protects RPE mitochondria from fragmentation.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE organelles > Late endosomes and lysosomes in the RPE
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Peroxisome biogenesis occurs by two distinct mechanisms, de novo synthesis (Ma et al., 2011; Agrawal and Subramani, 2016) or, self-replication through growth and fission (Schrader et al., 2012).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE organelles > Peroxisome biogenesis and implications for RPE health
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Ma et al., 2011
- Not checked yetcites Schrader et al., 2012 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In de novo synthesis, mature peroxisomes are built incrementally, with the first step a budding of pre-peroxisomal vesicles bearing complementary proteins of the early import machinery, PEX16 and PEX3, from membranes of the endoplasmic reticulum and mitochondria, respectively (Schrader and Pellegrini, 2017; Sugiura et al., 2017). Heterotypic fusion of PEX3- and PEX16-bearing vesicles establish a”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE organelles > Peroxisome biogenesis and implications for RPE health
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Schrader and Pellegrini, 2017
- Not checked yetcites Sugiura et al., 2017 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Peroxisomes are degraded by regulated autophagy (Deosaran et al., 2013; Nordgren et al., 2013) and to a lesser extent, peroxisomal Lon peptidase 2 (LONP2)-mediated proteolysis, and membrane disruption that is mediated by lipoxygenase 15 (Yokota et al., 2001; Yokota and Fahimi, 2009; Walker et al., 2018).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE organelles > Peroxisome biogenesis and implications for RPE health
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Deosaran et al., 2013
- Not checked yetcites Nordgren et al., 2013 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“PEX11β was shown to mediate peroxisome proliferation in the absence of external stimuli (Schrader et al., 1998). It facilitates peroxisome fission by promoting membrane deformation that depends on its self-dimerization (Bonekamp et al., 2013).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE organelles > Peroxisome biogenesis and implications for RPE health
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“where peroxisome number is increased, but antioxidant and enzyme activity is reduced (Beier et al., 1993).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE organelles > Peroxisome biogenesis and implications for RPE health
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Beier et al., 1993 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Peroxisome proliferation is induced through stimulation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) α activity in response to oxidative stress following ischemic injury in neurons (Young et al., 2015).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE organelles > Peroxisome biogenesis and implications for RPE health
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Young et al., 2015 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“DLP-1 has a shared function in peroxisomal and mitochondrial fission, and is recruited to peroxisomes by two mitochondrial-associated fission factors, mitochondrial fission factor (MFF) (Gandre-Babbe and van der Bliek, 2008), and mitochondrial fission 1 (FIS1), following PEX11β-mediated elongation (Koch et al., 2005; Itoyama et al., 2013).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE organelles > Peroxisome biogenesis and implications for RPE health
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In contrast, the RPE is oxidative and uses lactate produced by the photoreceptors and fatty acids from ingested OSs to fuel mitochondrial metabolism (Adijanto et al., 2014; Adijanto and Philp, 2014; Kanow et al., 2017; Reyes-Reveles et al., 2017).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE metabolism
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Adijanto et al., 2014
- Not checked yetcites Adijanto and Philp, 2014
- Not checked yetcites Kanow et al., 2017 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A recent proteomic study of C. elegans also showed an increase in peroxisome number, and reduced import efficiency in aged versus young worms (Narayan et al., 2016)”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE organelles > Peroxisome biogenesis and implications for RPE health
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Narayan et al., 2016 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Oxidants and ultraviolet light stimulate the elongation of peroxisomes in cultured hepatic cells (Schrader et al., 1999).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE organelles > Peroxisome biogenesis and implications for RPE health
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Schrader et al., 1999 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“A quantitative assessment of 13C-palmitate oxidation by human fetal RPE suggested that 50% of palmitate-derived acetyl-CoA was diverted towards ketogenesis to produce β-HB which was released apically, whereas the remaining acetyl-CoA entered the TCA cycle (Adijanto et al., 2014).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE metabolism > Metabolism in the RPE and its relationship to the photoreceptors
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Adijanto et al., 2014
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Expression of PPARα and β/δ was relatively high in freshly isolated human RPE; however, PPARγ was not detected.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE organelles > Peroxisome biogenesis and implications for RPE health
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Dwyer et al., 2011 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Little is known of the role of PPARs in the regulation of RPE peroxisome homeostasis or proliferation.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“PPARs are nuclear hormone receptors that respond to binding of endogenous fatty acids and fatty acid derivatives such as eicosanoids, by regulating expression of genes within diverse cellular pathways including lipid metabolism and inflammation (Kliewer et al., 1997; Chinetti et al., 2000).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE organelles > Peroxisome biogenesis and implications for RPE health
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The RPE is the gatekeeper of the outer retina, and regulates the flux of nutrients and oxygen between the choroid and the subretinal space.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE metabolism
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“impaired peroxisome turnover during aging could result in the elevated peroxisome numbers that have been observed.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE organelles > Peroxisome biogenesis and implications for RPE health
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Rests on an assumption: The specific mechanisms responsible for elevated peroxisomes in ageing and in AMD have not been elucidated in the RPE.
In the paper
“Glucose, the major energy substrate of photoreceptor and Müller glial cells, is transported from the choroid to the subretinal space by the glucose transporter, GLUT1, which is expressed in the basolateral and apical membranes of the RPE (Swarup et al., 2019)”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE metabolism
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Swarup et al., 2019 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Glycolysis is low in the RPE so that glucose is spared for the outer retina.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE metabolism > Metabolism in the RPE and its relationship to the photoreceptors
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Recently PPARβ/δ was implicated in modification of AMD disease severity, but distinct effects of PPARβ/δ modulation depended on cell type (Choudhary et al., 2016).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE organelles > Peroxisome biogenesis and implications for RPE health
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Choudhary et al., 2016 source
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Since mitochondria have roles in energy production, calcium regulation, and generation of metabolites that regulate gene expression, it is easy to understand how mitochondrial dysfunction could contribute to pathological changes in the retina.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE metabolism > Metabolism in the RPE and its relationship to the photoreceptors
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“This deletion did not impact differentiation or functional properties of the RPE, demonstrating that glycolysis is not required to support the metabolic needs of the RPE (Swarup et al., 2019) nor, as predicted from early in vitro studies, is it required for late stage differentiation (Adijanto et al., 2014).”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE metabolism > Metabolism in the RPE and its relationship to the photoreceptors
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Swarup et al., 2019 source
- Not checked yetcites Adijanto et al., 2014
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In fact, a shift from oxidative to glycolytic metabolism leads to dedifferentiation of the RPE and a loss of expression of proteins required for RPE-specific functions.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE metabolism > Metabolism in the RPE and its relationship to the photoreceptors
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
Dysfunction of the RPE underlies many inherited and acquired diseases that cause permanent blindness.
“Dysfunction of the RPE underlies many inherited and acquired diseases that cause permanent blindness.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The RPE is the primary caretaker of photoreceptor health and function.
“The retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), a monolayer of post-mitotic polarized epithelial cells, strategically situated between the photoreceptors and the choroid, is the primary caretaker of photoreceptor health and function.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The RPE forms a critical barrier between the retina and the systemic circulation and performs many essential functions to support the neural retina.
“The retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) forms a critical barrier between the retina and the systemic circulation, and performs many essential functions to support the neural retina.”
The paper relies on this without support.
New technologies such as live-cell imaging have resulted in major advancement in our understanding of areas such as the daily phagocytosis and clearance of photoreceptor outer segment tips, autophagy, endolysosome function, and the metabolic interplay between the RPE and photoreceptors.
“In recent years, new technologies such as live-cell imaging have resulted in major advancement in our understanding of areas such as the daily phagocytosis and clearance of photoreceptor outer segment tips, autophagy, endolysosome function, and the metabolic interplay between the RPE and photoreceptors.”
The paper relies on this without support.
OS phagocytosis is an important function of RPE cells.
“Given that OS phagocytosis is an important function of RPE cells, measuring phagocytic capacity of these cells is a commonly-used metric.”
The paper relies on this without support.
RPE cell cultures are disconnected from in vivo rhythms.
“RPE cell cultures appear to be disconnected from in vivo rhythms, but are nevertheless amenable to experimentally-induced pulses of OS phagocytosis.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Cysteine proteases are considerably more abundant than aspartyl proteases.
“Cysteine proteases are considerably more abundant than aspartyl proteases.”
The paper relies on this without support.
OS phagosomes have a high lipid content.
“Given the high lipid content of OS phagosomes, it is not surprising that the RPE has the highest acid lipase activity of all ocular tissues (Hayasaka et al., 1977).”
The paper relies on this without support.
Classical autophagy occurs at a basal, constitutive level in all eukaryotic cells.
“Classical autophagy occurs at a basal, constitutive level in all eukaryotic cells, and is modulated by intrinsic and extrinsic stimuli.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The specific mechanisms responsible for elevated peroxisomes in ageing and in AMD have not been elucidated in the RPE.
“However, the specific mechanisms responsible for elevated peroxisomes in ageing and in AMD have not been elucidated in the RPE.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Little is known of the role of PPARs in the regulation of RPE peroxisome homeostasis or proliferation.
“However, little is known of the role of PPARs in the regulation of RPE peroxisome homeostasis or proliferation.”
The paper relies on this without support.
No studies have demonstrated elevated peroxisome numbers or function as a result of PPAR regulation in RPE cells.
“However, we are otherwise unaware of studies demonstrating elevated peroxisome numbers or function as a result of PPAR regulation in RPE cells.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > RPE organelles
“Other organelles include OS phagosomes (see Section 3), autophagosomes (see Section 4), and endosomes and lysosomes, whose functions includethe degradation of the two former organelles.”
§ The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium☆ > Intersection of phagocytosis with autophagy: LC3-associated phagocytosis
“Classical autophagy in the RPE, particularly in relation to retinal degeneration, will be discussed in Section 5.”
Citations
Cites
2 retracted
Martinez, J., Malireddi, R. K. S., Lu, Q., Cunha, L. D., Pelletier, S., Gingras, S., Orchard, R., Guan, J.-L., Tan, H., Peng, J., et al. (2015) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb3192 · Cited by 758
RetractedMartinez, J., Almendinger, J., Oberst, A., Ness, R., Dillon, C. P., Fitzgerald, P., Hengartner, M. O., & Green, D. R. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1113421108 · Cited by 655 · cited 1×
“LAP was first identified about a decade ago in studies on phagocytosis of pathogens and dead cells by immune cells (Sanjuan et al., 2007; Martinez et al., 2011) (Fig.”
BackgroundRetractedRepertoires of Autophagy in the Pathogenesis of Ocular Diseases
Li, Y., Jiang, Q. L., Cao, G.-F., Yao, J., & Yan, B. (2015) · Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1159/000373980 · Cited by 16,351
Shedding light on the cell biology of extracellular vesicles
van Niel, G., D'Angelo, G., & Raposo, G. (2018) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm.2017.125 · Cited by 8,369
Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition).
Klionsky, D. J., Abdelmohsen, K., Abe, A., Abedin, M. J., Abeliovich, H., Acevedo Arozena, A., Adachi, H., Adams, C. M., Adams, P. D., Adeli, K., et al. (2016) · Autophagy · doi:10.1080/15548627.2015.1100356 · Cited by 5,894
Self-citationCui, C., Cui, J., Jin, F., Cui, Y., Li, R., Jiang, X., Tian, Y., Wang, R. C., Jiang, P., & Gao, J. (2017) · Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1159/000479571 · Cited by 5,214
Antimicrobial Autophagy: A Conserved Innate Immune Response in Drosophila
Moy, R. H., & Cherry, S. R. (2013) · Journal of Innate Immunity · doi:10.1159/000350326 · Cited by 3,551
Biological Functions of Autophagy Genes: A Disease Perspective
Levine, B., & Kroemer, G. (2019) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.09.048 · Cited by 2,832
The Retinal Pigment Epithelium in Visual Function
Strauss, O. (2005) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00021.2004 · Cited by 2,828
Huotari, J., & Helenius, A. (2011) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1038/emboj.2011.286 · Cited by 2,448
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Review of Trustworthy and Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Chamola, V., Hassija, V., Sulthana, A. R., Ghosh, D., Dhingra, D., & Sikdar, B. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3294569 · Cited by 352
Structure and function of ABCA4 and its role in the visual cycle and Stargardt macular degeneration
Molday, R. S., Garces, F. A., Scortecci, J. F., & Molday, L. L. (2022) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2021.101036 · Cited by 107
Implications of genetic variation in the complement system in age-related macular degeneration
de Jong, S., Gagliardi, G., Garanto, A., de Breuk, A., Lechanteur, Y. T. E., Katti, S., van den Heuvel, L. P., Volokhina, E. B., & den Hollander, A. I. (2021) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2021.100952 · Cited by 71
La Cunza, N., Tan, L. X., Thamban, T., Germer, C. J., Rathnasamy, G., Toops, K. A., & Lakkaraju, A. (2021) · JCI Insight · doi:10.1172/jci.insight.142254 · Cited by 65
Self-citationHammadi, S., Tzoumas, N., Ferrara, M., Meschede, I. P., Lo, K., Harris, C., Lako, M., & Steel, D. H. (2023) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm12082870 · Cited by 44
Syndromic retinitis pigmentosa.
Karuntu, J. S., Almushattat, H., Nguyen, X.-T.-A., Plomp, A. S., Wanders, R. J. A., Hoyng, C. B., van Schooneveld, M. J., Schalij-Delfos, N. E., Brands, M. M., Leroy, B. P., et al. (2025) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2024.101324 · Cited by 39
Therapeutic targeting of the complement system in ocular disease
Rathi, S., Hasan, R., Ueffing, M., & Clark, S. J. (2023) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2023.103757 · Cited by 24
Petsevа, Y., Mladenova, K., Ganeva, M., Radeva, V., Videv, P., Doumanov, J., & Petrova, S. (2025) · Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics · doi:10.1016/j.abb.2025.110351 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Lakkaraju, A., Umapathy, A., Tan, L. X., Daniele, L., Philp, N. J., Boesze-Battaglia, K., & Williams, D. S.
- Affiliations
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- Thomas Jefferson University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Williams, David S.
- Venue
- Progress in Retinal and Eye Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-09
- Volume
- 78
- Pages
- 100846
- ISSN
- 1350-9462 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC8941496
- OpenAlex
- W3007934773
- Semantic Scholar
- 63c695d367d8f86b4997e021b2442387126d8b1b
- Cited by
- 422
- References
- 379
- Citations by year
- 2026: 59 · 2025: 79 · 2024: 94 · 2023: 70 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 14
- FWCI
- 4.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Progress in Retinal and Eye Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Scholarly Commons (University of Pennsylvania) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- OS
- NIH NEI (R01 EY023299, R01 EY026525, R01 EY012042, R21 EY029826, R01EY027442, R01EY013408)
- Foundation Fighting Blindness grant
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Development and Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Retinal Imaging and Analysis
- Keywords
- retinal pigment epithelium, photoreceptor outer segment phagocytosis, autophagy, retinal disease, live-cell imaging
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-09, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-09 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review