Cited by 936biodegradable polymer synthesis and propertiesCarbon dioxide utilization in catalysisPolymer crystallization and properties

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 470 of the 475 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 431 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Catalysis as an Enabling Science for Sustainable Polymers

Open access
Zhang, Xiangyi, Fevre, Mareva, Jones, Gavin O., Waymouth, Robert M.·2018·Chemical Reviews

Abstract

The replacement of current petroleum-based plastics with sustainable alternatives is a crucial but formidable challenge for the modern society. Catalysis presents an enabling tool to facilitate the development of sustainable polymers. This review provides a system-level analysis of sustainable polymers and outlines key criteria with respect to the feedstocks the polymers are derived from, the manner in which the polymers are generated, and the end-of-use options. Specifically, we define sustainable polymers as a class of materials that are derived from renewable feedstocks and exhibit closed-loop life cycles. Among potential candidates, aliphatic polyesters and polycarbonates are promising materials due to their renewable resources and excellent biodegradability. The development of renewable monomers, the versatile synthetic routes to convert these monomers to polyesters and polycarbonate, and the different end-of-use options for these polymers are critically reviewed, with a focus on recent advances in catalytic transformations that lower the technological barriers for developing more sustainable replacements for petroleum-based plastics.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This review argues that catalysis is an enabling science for sustainable polymers, defined as renewable-feedstock-derived materials with closed-loop life cycles, and focuses on aliphatic polyesters and polycarbonates. It surveys catalytic routes from renewable feedstocks to monomers, polymerization methods, and end-of-use recycling or biodegradation, while noting incomplete sustainability metrics and economic/infrastructure barriers.

Key findings

  • Sustainable polymers are defined as materials derived from renewable feedstocks that exhibit closed-loop life cycles; aliphatic polyesters and polycarbonates are highlighted because they can be made from renewable monomers, synthesized by versatile routes, and are biodegradable or chemically recyclable.
  • Global plastics production grew from 1.65 million tons in 1950 to 311 million tons in 2014 and is expected to grow 3–4% per year; more than 300 million metric tons of plastic waste is generated annually, with 4.8–12.7 million metric tons entering the ocean.
  • Bio-derived plastics remain a small share: in 2014 only 1.7 megatons of more than 300 megatons of polymers produced globally were bio-derived, mainly PLA, biopolyethylene, and bioPET; in the United States in 2014, over 75% of plastic waste was landfilled, and plastics recycling rates are <10%.
  • Catalytic advances cited include MnCo2O4-supported Ru giving 99% FDCA yield from base-free air oxidation of HMF, zeolite-catalyzed one-step conversion of lactic acid to lactide at ~79% selectivity at full conversion, and TBD-catalyzed PLA alcoholysis reaching quantitative conversion in 2 min at room temperature with 1.5 equivalents of alcohol per ester bond.

Methods

  • This is a review and system-level analysis, not an experimental study; it considers feedstocks, monomer production, polymerization, use, and end-of-use options, focusing on polyesters and polycarbonates as representative sustainable materials.
  • It synthesizes literature on catalytic transformations from renewable feedstocks to monomers, monomers to polyesters and polycarbonates, and chemical or biological recycling/degradation, comparing routes by atom efficiency, green catalytic systems, and mild polymerization conditions.
  • It includes tabulated thermodynamic parameters for ring-opening polymerization of cyclic esters and comparison tables of polymerization methods for polyesters and polycarbonates.

Limitations

  • Stated: there is no universally recognized standard system or set of metrics for quantifying sustainability; life-cycle assessment results vary with modeling assumptions and feedstock choice, are often limited to cradle-to-gate, and switching from petroleum polymers to renewable-resource polymers does not necessarily reduce environmental impacts.
  • Stated: many biofeedstocks and biorefinery processes are costly or energy-intensive; sustainable polymers must meet cost and performance benchmarks; the existing plastics economic ecosystem is entrenched, and recovery/reuse infrastructure is underdeveloped.
  • Evident: as a review, it reports no new experimental data; its scope excludes biomedical biodegradation of aliphatic polyesters and polycarbonates and focuses on selected polymer classes, so quantitative comparisons depend on cited studies and their assumptions.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00329

Cites

470 of 470 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 of 431 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

Show all 265 claims

  • Probably not a substantial claim. 76
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 158
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 2
218 of 218
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The definition of sustainable polymers as materials with closed-loop life cycles is adopted as an aspirational goal.

    “We have adopted this definition as an aspirational goal in the spirit of sustainable development.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Cellulose and hemicellulose can provide an almost unlimited source of C5 and C6 sugars if efficient strategies are devised to recover and purify these feedstocks effectively.

    “The two major components of lignocellulose, cellulose and hemicellulose, provide an almost unlimited source of C5 and C6 sugars, provided efficient strategies can be devised to recover and purify these feedstocks effectively.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Identifying the best pathway to convert a given feedstock to a given monomer is one of the first challenges for the development of sustainable polymers.

    “Identifying the best pathway to convert the aforementioned feedstock to a given monomer is one of the first challenges for the development of sustainable polymers.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Economic disincentives have contributed to the modest rates of recycling and material recovery.

    “economic disincentives have contributed to the modest rates of recycling and material recovery.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Direct pyrolysis cannot achieve monomer recovery for step-growth polyesters and polycarbonates.

    “While monomer recovery cannot be achieved through direct pyrolysis for step-growth polyesters and polycarbonates, this is an attractive recycling option for chain-growth polymers.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Direct pyrolysis is an attractive recycling option for chain-growth polymers.

    “While monomer recovery cannot be achieved through direct pyrolysis for step-growth polyesters and polycarbonates, this is an attractive recycling option for chain-growth polymers.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Plastic sorting and tolerance to contaminants in plastics feeds presents a significant challenge for chemical recycling.

    “Similar to mechanical recycling, plastic sorting and tolerance to contaminants in the plastics feeds presents a significant challenge for chemical recycling.”
7 of 7

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 475 references

5 of the 475 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Francis R., 2017, Recycling of Polymers: Methods, Characterization and Applications
  2. Valuing Plastic: The Business Case for Measuring, Managing and Disclosing Plastic Use in the Consumer Goods Industry, 2014, United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP).http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11822/9238(accessed August 5, 2017).
  3. Kaenzig, J.; H, G.; Rocher, M.Proceedings of the 2nd World Conference and Technology Exhibition on Biomass For Energy, Industry and Climate Change, Rome, Italy, 2004.
  4. 10.1039/c3py01213a · DOI · Paper page
  5. Werpy T., 2004, Top Value Added Chemicals from Biomass. Vol. I - Results of Screening for Potential Candidates from Sugars and Synthesis Gas
  6. Kassaian J.-M., 2002, Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry
  7. Sivasankaran C., 2016, J. Env. Biol., 37, 1539
  8. 2008, Biodiesel from Triglycerides via Transesterification
  9. 10.1039/b922014c · DOI · Paper page
  10. Wang L. S., 2005, Chin. Chem. Lett., 16, 572
  11. 10.1002/macp.201200332 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1039/c5py01843a · DOI
  13. 10.1021/ma200685u · DOI · Paper page
  14. Dove A. P., 2009, Handbook of Ring-Opening Polymerization
  15. Data from Noone A., Collected PET bottles, Proceedings of 13th International Polyester Recycling Forum, 2008.
  16. Genta, M.; Yano, F.; Kondo, Y.; Matsubara, W.; Oomoto, S.Technical Review;Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd., 2003, Vol.40, pp1–4.
  17. 10.1073/pnas.1404596111 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 601–700 of 936

Metadata

Authors
Zhang, X., Fevre, M., Jones, G. O., & Waymouth, R. M.
Affiliations
  • Stanford University (US)
  • IBM Research−Almaden, 650 Harry Road, San Jose, California 95120, United States
  • IBM Research - Almaden (US)
Corresponding author
Waymouth, Robert M.
Venue
Chemical Reviews
Published
2017-10-19
Volume
118
Issue
2
Pages
839-885
ISSN
  • 0009-2665 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6890
OpenAlex
W2765471533
Cited by
936
References
475
Citations by year
2026: 63 · 2025: 106 · 2024: 116 · 2023: 131 · 2022: 141 · 2021: 127 · 2020: 118 · 2019: 77 · 2018: 55 · 2017: 1
FWCI
4.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Chemical Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Division of Chemistry (CHE-1607092)
  • LAM Foundation
  • Stanford University
  • U.S. Department of Energy (DE-SC0005430)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Process Chemistry and Technology › Carbon dioxide utilization in catalysis
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer crystallization and properties
Keywords
sustainable polymers, catalysis, renewable raw materials, aliphatic polyesters, polycarbonate, renewable monomers, biodegradable polymers, polymer synthesis, biocatalysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-09, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-09 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review