The DOI matches its Crossref record; 161 of the 161 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 4 of the 231 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation
Open accessAbstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third leading cause of worldwide cancer mortality. HCC almost exclusively develops in patients with chronic liver disease, driven by a vicious cycle of liver injury, inflammation and regeneration that typically spans decades. Increasing evidence points towards a key role of the bacterial microbiome in promoting the progression of liver disease and the development of HCC. Here, we will review mechanisms by which the gut microbiota promotes hepatocarcinogenesis, focusing on the leaky gut, bacterial dysbiosis, microbe-associated molecular patterns and bacterial metabolites as key pathways that drive cancer-promoting liver inflammation, fibrosis and genotoxicity. On the basis of accumulating evidence from preclinical studies, we propose the intestinal-microbiota-liver axis as a promising target for the simultaneous prevention of chronic liver disease progression and HCC development in patients with advanced liver disease. We will review in detail therapeutic modalities and discuss clinical settings in which targeting the gut-microbiota-liver axis for the prevention of disease progression and HCC development seems promising.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
139 Not checked yet · 30 Own interpretation · 2 No basis given · 1 Supported · 1 Partly supported · accuracy not yet measured
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“A major problem with the use of norfloxacin is the development of antibiotic resistance110–112, suggesting that it might be suitable for treatment lasting weeks to months but not for long-term or life-long application in patients with cirrhosis.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > TARGETING MICROBIOTA TO PREVENT HCC > Antibiotics
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [110] Fernandez, J. et al. Bacterial infections in cirrhosis: epidemiological changes with invasive procedures and norfloxacin prophylaxis. Hepatology 35, 140–148 (2002). source
The Discussion calls the emergence of quinolone-resistant bacteria during long-term norfloxacin prophylaxis “a problem of major concern.” It also reports a higher proportion of quinolone-resistant spontaneous bacterial peritonitis among patients receiving long-term norfloxacin. The citing authors’ suggestion about limiting treatment duration is their own inference, not part of the claim assessed here. (LLM, conf=0.94)
- Supportedcites [111] Fernandez, J. et al. Prevalence and risk factors of infections by multiresistant bacteria in cirrhosis: a prospective study. Hepatology 55, 1551–1561 (2012). source
The Discussion describes the rapid development of quinolone-resistant bacteria in patients receiving long-term norfloxacin prophylaxis. The Abstract also identifies long-term norfloxacin prophylaxis as independently associated with multiresistant infections. The citing authors’ suggestion about limiting treatment duration is their own inference, not part of the claim assessed here. (LLM, conf=0.92)
- Supportedcites [112] Tandon, P., Delisle, A., Topal, J. E. & Garcia-Tsao, G. High prevalence of antibiotic-resistant bacterial infections among patients with cirrhosis at a US liver center. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 10, 1291–1298 (2012). source
The Discussion (page not provided) reports that norfloxacin prophylaxis has been identified as a predictor of antibiotic-resistant bacterial infections in patients with cirrhosis. It also reports higher rates of fluoroquinolone-resistant organisms with prophylaxis and similar findings in this study. The recommendation about how long to use norfloxacin is the citing authors’ inference, not part of the claim attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.90)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Accordingly, FXR activation by agonists GW4064 or obeticholic acid (OCA) attenuates mucosal injury, ileal barrier permeability, bacterial overgrowth and bacterial translocation in mice and rats 20,21,141,142.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > TARGETING MICROBIOTA TO PREVENT HCC > Targeting the gut barrier
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [20] Inagaki, T. et al. Regulation of antibacterial defense in the small intestine by the nuclear bile acid receptor. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 3920–3925 (2006). source
- Not checked yetcites [21] Gadaleta, R. M. et al. Farnesoid X receptor activation inhibits inflammation and preserves the intestinal barrier in inflammatory bowel disease. Gut 60, 463–472 (2011). source
- Partly supportedcites [141] Verbeke, L. et al. The FXR agonist obeticholic acid prevents gut barrier dysfunction and bacterial translocation in cholestatic rats. Am. J. Pathol. 185, 409–419 (2015). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The section on FXR deactivation and intestinal bacterial translocation reports that obeticholic acid (INT-747) reduced ileal permeability and bacterial translocation in bile-duct-ligated rats. Our copy does not establish that GW4064 had these effects, that they occurred in mice, or that either agonist reduced mucosal injury or bacterial overgrowth; those parts of the broader claim are unsupported by this source. (LLM, conf=0.87)
- Not checked yetcites [142] Ubeda, M. et al. Obeticholic acid reduces bacterial translocation and inhibits intestinal inflammation in cirrhotic rats. J. Hepatol. 64, 1049–1057 (2016). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The key contribution of the gut microbiota to early stages of ALD has been firmly established in the past two decades.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > GUT MICROBIOTA AND DISEASE PROGRESSION > ALD
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [16] Pradere, J. P., Troeger, J. S., Dapito, D. H., Mencin, A. A. & Schwabe, R. F. Toll-like receptor 4 and hepatic fibrogenesis. Semin. Liver Dis. 30, 232–244 (2010). source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Moreover, there is an increase in bacterial DNA , a well-established TLR9 agonist, in the peripheral blood of patients with CLD29.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > THE INTESTINAL EPITHELIAL BARRIER
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [29] Bellot, P. et al. Bacterial DNA translocation is associated with systemic circulatory abnormalities and intrahepatic endothelial dysfunction in patients with cirrhosis. Hepatology 52, 2044–2052 (2010). source
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Hence, the presence of liver cirrhosis represents the most important unifying risk factor for the development of HCC.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > GUT MICROBIOTA AND DISEASE PROGRESSION
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Hepatocellular carcinoma almost exclusively develops in patients with chronic liver disease and almost never occurs spontaneously without liver disease.
In the paper
“Likewise, serum LPS levels are increased in patients with chronic alcohol abuse16.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > GUT MICROBIOTA AND DISEASE PROGRESSION > ALD
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [16] Pradere, J. P., Troeger, J. S., Dapito, D. H., Mencin, A. A. & Schwabe, R. F. Toll-like receptor 4 and hepatic fibrogenesis. Semin. Liver Dis. 30, 232–244 (2010). source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Together, these findings demonstrate that the chronically injured liver is subject to increased exposure to a wide range of TLR ligands as well as other bacterial products and metabolites.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > THE INTESTINAL EPITHELIAL BARRIER
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“At the same time, there is decreased abundance of beneficial bacteria in the gut, such as Lachnospiraceae33.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > THE INTESTINAL EPITHELIAL BARRIER
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [33] Chen, Y. et al. Characterization of fecal microbial communities in patients with liver cirrhosis. Hepatology 54, 562–572 (2011). source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Likewise, chronic alcohol intake increases endotoxin levels in peripheral blood from 2.5 pg/ml in healthy individuals to 14–19 pg/ml in patients with alcoholic liver disease (ALD)25.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > THE INTESTINAL EPITHELIAL BARRIER
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [25] Fukui, H., Brauner, B., Bode, J. C. & Bode, C. Plasma endotoxin concentrations in patients with alcoholic and non-alcoholic liver disease: reevaluation with an improved chromogenic assay. J. Hepatol. 12, 162–169 (1991). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Moreover, subgroups of patients, such as those with cirrhosis, men, patients >55 years of age, individuals positive for antibodies against hepatitis B core protein (anti-HBc) as well as patients with high cumulative consumption of alcohol, might have extremely high risk development for HCC development, risk that may be >40% in a 10-year period42.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > GUT MICROBIOTA AND DISEASE PROGRESSION > ALD
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [42] Joshi, K., Kohli, A., Manch, R. & Gish, R. Alcoholic liver disease: high risk or low risk for developing hepatocellular carcinoma? Clin. Liver Dis. 20, 563–580 (2016). source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Mean portal vein LPS levels increase in chronic liver injury from <3 pg/ml in healthy volunteers to 4.9 pg/ml, 7.9 pg/ml and 10.2 pg/ml in patients with Child–Turcotte-Pugh cirrhosis stage A, B and C, respectively24.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > THE INTESTINAL EPITHELIAL BARRIER
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [24] Lin, R. S. et al. Endotoxemia in patients with chronic liver diseases: relationship to severity of liver diseases, presence of esophageal varices, and hyperdynamic circulation. J. Hepatol. 22, 165–172 (1995). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The ability of ethanol and its metabolite acetaldehyde to disrupt tight junctions contributes to the high levels of bacterial translocation in ALD43.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > GUT MICROBIOTA AND DISEASE PROGRESSION > ALD
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [43] Rao, R. K., Seth, A. & Sheth, P. Recent advances in alcoholic liver disease I. Role of intestinal permeability and endotoxemia in alcoholic liver disease. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 286, G881–G884 (2004). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Even a single binge of alcohol is sufficient to increase bacterial translocation, as evidenced by an increase of LPS in portal blood rats from undetectable levels to 30–80 pg/ml after ethanol administration 16.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > GUT MICROBIOTA AND DISEASE PROGRESSION > ALD
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [16] Pradere, J. P., Troeger, J. S., Dapito, D. H., Mencin, A. A. & Schwabe, R. F. Toll-like receptor 4 and hepatic fibrogenesis. Semin. Liver Dis. 30, 232–244 (2010). source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, alterations in choline metabolism might link dysbiosis to the development of NAFLD.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > GUT MICROBIOTA AND DISEASE PROGRESSION > NAFLD
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Interestingly, dysbiotic microbiota from mice fed a high-fat diet metabolize and convert dietary choline into methylamines, resulting in low circulating levels of plasma phosphatidylcholine60.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > GUT MICROBIOTA AND DISEASE PROGRESSION > NAFLD
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [60] Dumas, M. E. et al. Metabolic profiling reveals a contribution of gut microbiota to fatty liver phenotype in insulin-resistant mice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 12511–12516 (2006). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“There is strong evidence for an important contribution of the microbiota–TLR4 axis to liver fibrosis.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > GUT MICROBIOTA AND DISEASE PROGRESSION > Liver fibrosis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [71] Luckey, T. D., Reyniers, J. A., Gyorgy, P. & Forbes, M. Germfree animals and liver necrosis. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 57, 932–935 (1954). source
- Not checked yetcites [72] Rutenburg, A. M. et al. The role of intestinal bacteria in the development of dietary cirrhosis in rats. J. Exp. Med. 106, 1–14 (1957). source
- Not checked yetcites [73] Seki, E. et al. TLR4 enhances TGF-beta signaling and hepatic fibrosis. Nat. Med. 13, 1324–1332 (2007). source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“High circulating LPS levels in mice and patients with CLD as well as in HCC14,24,77,78 demonstrate the presence of a leaky gut during multiple stages of CLD and hepatocarcinogenesis (FIG. 1).”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > MECHANISMS BY WHICH THE MICROBIOTA PROMOTES HCC > HCC promotion via a leaky gut and the MAMP–TLR axis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [14] Yu, L. X. et al. Endotoxin accumulation prevents carcinogen-induced apoptosis and promotes liver tumorigenesis in rodents. Hepatology 52, 1322–1333 (2010). source
- Not checked yetcites [24] Lin, R. S. et al. Endotoxemia in patients with chronic liver diseases: relationship to severity of liver diseases, presence of esophageal varices, and hyperdynamic circulation. J. Hepatol. 22, 165–172 (1995). source
- Not checked yetcites [77] Zhang, H. L. et al. Profound impact of gut homeostasis on chemically-induced pro-tumorigenic inflammation and hepatocarcinogenesis in rats. J. Hepatol. 57, 803–812 (2012). source
- Not checked yetcites [78] Nolan, J. P. The role of intestinal endotoxin in liver injury: a long and evolving history. Hepatology 52, 1829–1835 (2010). source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: The multi-layer intestinal barrier normally keeps hepatic exposure to pro-inflammatory microbe-associated molecular patterns minimal.
In the paper
“As such, germ-free mice display decreased body weight despite increased food intake52.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > GUT MICROBIOTA AND DISEASE PROGRESSION > NAFLD
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [52] Backhed, F. et al. The gut microbiota as an environmental factor that regulates fat storage. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 15718–15723 (2004). source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Likewise, intestinal permeability is increased in patients with NAFLD63.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > GUT MICROBIOTA AND DISEASE PROGRESSION > NAFLD
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [63] Miele, L. et al. Increased intestinal permeability and tight junction alterations in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology 49, 1877–1887 (2009). source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“A number of functional studies have shown a key contribution of the gut-microbiota–TLR4 axis to ALD45:”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > GUT MICROBIOTA AND DISEASE PROGRESSION > ALD
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [45] Szabo, G. Gut-liver axis in alcoholic liver disease. Gastroenterology 148, 30–36 (2015). source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Hence, treatment with antibiotics ameliorates high-fat-diet-induced NAFLD in mice55.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > GUT MICROBIOTA AND DISEASE PROGRESSION > NAFLD
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [55] Jiang, C. et al. Intestinal farnesoid X receptor signaling promotes nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. J. Clin. Invest. 125, 386–402 (2015). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Consistent with previous studies71–73, treatment with nonabsorbable antibiotics resulted in a strong reduction of fibrosis despite increased liver injury13.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > GUT MICROBIOTA AND DISEASE PROGRESSION > Liver fibrosis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [13] Dapito, D. H. et al. Promotion of hepatocellular carcinoma by the intestinal microbiota and TLR4. Cancer Cell 21, 504–516 (2012). source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Conversely, fecal microbiota transplantation from healthy mice attenuated steatohepatitis in high fat diet treated mice 66.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > GUT MICROBIOTA AND DISEASE PROGRESSION > NAFLD
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [66] Zhou, D. et al. Total fecal microbiota transplantation alleviates high-fat diet-induced steatohepatitis in mice via beneficial regulation of gut microbiota. Sci. Rep. 7, 1529 (2017). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Notably, there is a strong correlation between hepatic fibrosis and HCC development with 80–90% of HCCs developing in fibrotic or cirrhotic livers.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > GUT MICROBIOTA AND DISEASE PROGRESSION > Liver fibrosis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [70] Affo, S., Yu, L. X. & Schwabe, R. F. The role of cancer-associated fibroblasts and fibrosis in liver cancer. Annu. Rev. Pathol. 12, 153–186 (2017). source
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Liver fibrosis is common to all types of advanced chronic liver disease.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Hence, the gut microbiota might control antiviral responses that affect disease progression and HCC development.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > GUT MICROBIOTA AND DISEASE PROGRESSION > Chronic viral hepatitis
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Studies in knockout mice have highlighted a key role for TLR4 and other important mediators in the TLR4 signalling pathway, such as CD14 and lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (LBP), in experimental models of toxic and cholestatic liver fibrosis73,74.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > GUT MICROBIOTA AND DISEASE PROGRESSION > Liver fibrosis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [73] Seki, E. et al. TLR4 enhances TGF-beta signaling and hepatic fibrosis. Nat. Med. 13, 1324–1332 (2007). source
- Not checked yetcites [74] Isayama, F. et al. LPS signaling enhances hepatic fibrogenesis caused by experimental cholestasis in mice. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 290, G1318–G1328 (2006). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The gut microbiota also has an important part in promoting HCC development in a mouse model in which HCC is driven by the carcinogen 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene (DMBA) and subsequent high-fat diet15.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > GUT MICROBIOTA AND DISEASE PROGRESSION > NAFLD
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [15] Yoshimoto, S. et al. Obesity-induced gut microbial metabolite promotes liver cancer through senescence secretome. Nature 499, 97–101 (2013). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In a model of NASH triggered by high-fat and high-cholesterol diet given to ApoE-deficient mice, TLR4 deficiency reduced hepatic inflammation and injury64.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > GUT MICROBIOTA AND DISEASE PROGRESSION > NAFLD
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [64] Ye, D. et al. Toll-like receptor-4 mediates obesity-induced non-alcoholic steatohepatitis through activation of X-box binding protein-1 in mice. Gut 61, 1058–1067 (2012). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Notably, HBV titres in patients positively correlate with risk for disease progression and HCC development69.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > GUT MICROBIOTA AND DISEASE PROGRESSION > Chronic viral hepatitis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [69] Chen, C. J. et al. Risk of hepatocellular carcinoma across a biological gradient of serum hepatitis B virus DNA level. JAMA 295, 65–73 (2006). source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Current data suggest that dysbiosis and alterations of the gut–liver axis in patients with end-stage viral hepatitis and cirrhosis are similar to alterations in patients with cirrhosis from other causes67.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > GUT MICROBIOTA AND DISEASE PROGRESSION > Chronic viral hepatitis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [67] Bajaj, J. S. et al. HCV eradication does not impact gut dysbiosis or systemic inflammation in cirrhotic patients. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 44, 638–643 (2016). source
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Accordingly, chronic infusion of low-dose LPS via osmotic pumps promotes HCC development in mice13.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > MECHANISMS BY WHICH THE MICROBIOTA PROMOTES HCC > HCC promotion via a leaky gut and the MAMP–TLR axis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [13] Dapito, D. H. et al. Promotion of hepatocellular carcinoma by the intestinal microbiota and TLR4. Cancer Cell 21, 504–516 (2012). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“TLR4 is present in multiple hepatic cell types, including Kupffer cells, hepatic stellate cells (HSCs), endothelial cells and hepatocytes.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > MECHANISMS BY WHICH THE MICROBIOTA PROMOTES HCC > HCC promotion via a leaky gut and the MAMP–TLR axis
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: TLR4 is expressed on multiple hepatic cell types, including Kupffer cells, hepatic stellate cells, endothelial cells and hepatocytes.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Metagenomic studies have revealed substantial alterations in the composition of the gut microbiota in a range of CLD as well as in patients with cirrhosis12,32.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > MECHANISMS BY WHICH THE MICROBIOTA PROMOTES HCC > HCC promotion via dysbiosis, bacterial metabolites and immunosuppression
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [12] Schnabl, B. & Brenner, D. A. Interactions between the intestinal microbiome and liver diseases. Gastroenterology 146, 1513–1524 (2014). source
- Not checked yetcites [32] Qin, N. et al. Alterations of the human gut microbiome in liver cirrhosis. Nature 513, 59–64 (2014). source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Experiments in bone-marrow-chimeric mice demonstrated that TLR4 expressed on liver-resident cells (which include hepatocytes, HSCs and Kupffer cells) is responsible for promotion of fibrogenesis and hepatocarcinogenesis13.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > MECHANISMS BY WHICH THE MICROBIOTA PROMOTES HCC > HCC promotion via a leaky gut and the MAMP–TLR axis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [13] Dapito, D. H. et al. Promotion of hepatocellular carcinoma by the intestinal microbiota and TLR4. Cancer Cell 21, 504–516 (2012). source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: TLR4 is expressed on multiple hepatic cell types, including Kupffer cells, hepatic stellate cells, endothelial cells and hepatocytes.
In the paper
“The key role of DCA in hepatocarcinogenesis was further demonstrated in experiments that showed increased HCC development in mice after supplementing diets with DCA, and decreased HCC formation after inhibition of 7α-dehydroxylation15.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > MECHANISMS BY WHICH THE MICROBIOTA PROMOTES HCC > HCC promotion via dysbiosis, bacterial metabolites and immunosuppression
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [15] Yoshimoto, S. et al. Obesity-induced gut microbial metabolite promotes liver cancer through senescence secretome. Nature 499, 97–101 (2013). source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Functional studies utilizing co-housing and faecal transplantation have provided evidence that dysbiosis is a transmissible driver of liver disease development and progression 65,89.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > MECHANISMS BY WHICH THE MICROBIOTA PROMOTES HCC > HCC promotion via dysbiosis, bacterial metabolites and immunosuppression
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [65] Henao-Mejia, J. et al. Inflammasome-mediated dysbiosis regulates progression of NAFLD and obesity. Nature 482, 179–185 (2012). source
- Not checked yetcites [89] De Minicis, S. et al. Dysbiosis contributes to fibrogenesis in the course of chronic liver injury in mice. Hepatology 59, 1738–1749 (2014). source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The key role of DCA in hepatocarcinogenesis was further demonstrated in experiments that showed increased HCC development in mice after supplementing diets with DCA, and decreased HCC formation after inhibition of 7α-dehydroxylation15.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > MECHANISMS BY WHICH THE MICROBIOTA PROMOTES HCC > HCC promotion via dysbiosis, bacterial metabolites and immunosuppression
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [15] Yoshimoto, S. et al. Obesity-induced gut microbial metabolite promotes liver cancer through senescence secretome. Nature 499, 97–101 (2013). source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In HSCs, TLR4 activation leads to an NF-κB-mediated upregulation of the hepatomitogen epiregulin13.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > MECHANISMS BY WHICH THE MICROBIOTA PROMOTES HCC > HCC promotion via a leaky gut and the MAMP–TLR axis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [13] Dapito, D. H. et al. Promotion of hepatocellular carcinoma by the intestinal microbiota and TLR4. Cancer Cell 21, 504–516 (2012). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Together, these data clearly show that the leaky gut, via MAMP–TLR-mediated signals, contributes to hepatocarcinogenesis.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > MECHANISMS BY WHICH THE MICROBIOTA PROMOTES HCC > HCC promotion via a leaky gut and the MAMP–TLR axis
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: TLR4 is expressed on multiple hepatic cell types, including Kupffer cells, hepatic stellate cells, endothelial cells and hepatocytes.
- Rests on an assumption: The multi-layer intestinal barrier normally keeps hepatic exposure to pro-inflammatory microbe-associated molecular patterns minimal.
In the paper
“As such, HCC development induced by the combination of DEN and CCl4 was attenuated in gut-sterilized and germ-free mice compared with their specific pathogen-free counterparts13.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > MECHANISMS BY WHICH THE MICROBIOTA PROMOTES HCC > HCC promotion via a leaky gut and the MAMP–TLR axis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [13] Dapito, D. H. et al. Promotion of hepatocellular carcinoma by the intestinal microbiota and TLR4. Cancer Cell 21, 504–516 (2012). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Conversely, inhibition of TLR4 signalling suppresses liver inflammation, fibrosis and HCC formation in mice and rats13,14,73.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > MECHANISMS BY WHICH THE MICROBIOTA PROMOTES HCC > HCC promotion via a leaky gut and the MAMP–TLR axis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [13] Dapito, D. H. et al. Promotion of hepatocellular carcinoma by the intestinal microbiota and TLR4. Cancer Cell 21, 504–516 (2012). source
- Not checked yetcites [14] Yu, L. X. et al. Endotoxin accumulation prevents carcinogen-induced apoptosis and promotes liver tumorigenesis in rodents. Hepatology 52, 1322–1333 (2010). source
- Not checked yetcites [73] Seki, E. et al. TLR4 enhances TGF-beta signaling and hepatic fibrosis. Nat. Med. 13, 1324–1332 (2007). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Moreover, it has been demonstrated that activation of the LPS–TLR4 signalling pathway in Kupffer cells leads to TNF- and IL6-dependent compensatory hepatocyte proliferation as well as reduced oxidative stress and apoptosis14.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > MECHANISMS BY WHICH THE MICROBIOTA PROMOTES HCC > HCC promotion via a leaky gut and the MAMP–TLR axis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [14] Yu, L. X. et al. Endotoxin accumulation prevents carcinogen-induced apoptosis and promotes liver tumorigenesis in rodents. Hepatology 52, 1322–1333 (2010). source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The key role of DCA in hepatocarcinogenesis was further demonstrated in experiments that showed increased HCC development in mice after supplementing diets with DCA, and decreased HCC formation after inhibition of 7α-dehydroxylation15.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > MECHANISMS BY WHICH THE MICROBIOTA PROMOTES HCC > HCC promotion via dysbiosis, bacterial metabolites and immunosuppression
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [15] Yoshimoto, S. et al. Obesity-induced gut microbial metabolite promotes liver cancer through senescence secretome. Nature 499, 97–101 (2013). source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Accordingly, epiregulin-deficient mice displayed reduced hepatocarcinogenesis when treated with DEN+CCl413.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > MECHANISMS BY WHICH THE MICROBIOTA PROMOTES HCC > HCC promotion via a leaky gut and the MAMP–TLR axis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [13] Dapito, D. H. et al. Promotion of hepatocellular carcinoma by the intestinal microbiota and TLR4. Cancer Cell 21, 504–516 (2012). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In concert with TLR2 agonist lipoteichoic acid, DCA promoted a senescence-associated secretory phenotype in hepatic stellate cells, which in turn suppressed anti-tumor immunity through a prostaglandin E2-dependent mechanisms90.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > MECHANISMS BY WHICH THE MICROBIOTA PROMOTES HCC > HCC promotion via dysbiosis, bacterial metabolites and immunosuppression
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [90] Loo, T. M. et al. Gut microbiota promotes obesity-associated liver cancer through PGE2-mediated suppression of antitumor immunity. Cancer Discov. 7, 522–538 (2017). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“and might provide a link between dysbiosis and alterations of the intestinal barrier that lead to a leaky gut and increased risk for HCC development, as discussed above.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > MECHANISMS BY WHICH THE MICROBIOTA PROMOTES HCC > HCC promotion via dysbiosis, bacterial metabolites and immunosuppression
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“At the same time, this treatment led to increased serum levels of deoxycholic acid (DCA), a secondary bile acid whose production depends on 7α-dehydroxylation of primary bile acids by the bacterial microbiota, notably Clostridium clusters.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > MECHANISMS BY WHICH THE MICROBIOTA PROMOTES HCC > HCC promotion via dysbiosis, bacterial metabolites and immunosuppression
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [15] Yoshimoto, S. et al. Obesity-induced gut microbial metabolite promotes liver cancer through senescence secretome. Nature 499, 97–101 (2013). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Accordingly, expression of the apoptosis marker cleaved caspase 3 in TLR4-deficient and gut-sterilized mice is inversely correlated with the formation of tumours13.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > MECHANISMS BY WHICH THE MICROBIOTA PROMOTES HCC > HCC promotion via a leaky gut and the MAMP–TLR axis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [13] Dapito, D. H. et al. Promotion of hepatocellular carcinoma by the intestinal microbiota and TLR4. Cancer Cell 21, 504–516 (2012). source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Similarly, dysbiosis represented a transmissible risk factor in a genetic NASH model in which NASH was triggered by inflammasome deficiency; co-housing of dysbiotic inflammasome-deficient mice with control mice resulted in the development of NASH in control mice65.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > MECHANISMS BY WHICH THE MICROBIOTA PROMOTES HCC > HCC promotion via dysbiosis, bacterial metabolites and immunosuppression
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [65] Henao-Mejia, J. et al. Inflammasome-mediated dysbiosis regulates progression of NAFLD and obesity. Nature 482, 179–185 (2012). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In concert with TLR2 agonist lipoteichoic acid, DCA promoted a senescence-associated secretory phenotype in hepatic stellate cells, which in turn suppressed anti-tumor immunity through a prostaglandin E2-dependent mechanisms90.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > MECHANISMS BY WHICH THE MICROBIOTA PROMOTES HCC > HCC promotion via dysbiosis, bacterial metabolites and immunosuppression
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [90] Loo, T. M. et al. Gut microbiota promotes obesity-associated liver cancer through PGE2-mediated suppression of antitumor immunity. Cancer Discov. 7, 522–538 (2017). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In a mouse model of NASH-induced HCC, triggered by the combination of DMBA and high-fat diet, there was a strong increase in Gram-positive bacterial strains, in particular of specific Clostridium clusters15.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > MECHANISMS BY WHICH THE MICROBIOTA PROMOTES HCC > HCC promotion via dysbiosis, bacterial metabolites and immunosuppression
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [15] Yoshimoto, S. et al. Obesity-induced gut microbial metabolite promotes liver cancer through senescence secretome. Nature 499, 97–101 (2013). source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Another key mechanism by which the LPS–TLR4 axis promotes HCC formation is via NF-κB-mediated prevention of hepatocyte apoptosis.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > MECHANISMS BY WHICH THE MICROBIOTA PROMOTES HCC > HCC promotion via a leaky gut and the MAMP–TLR axis
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Together, these studies link bacterial dysbiosis to altered immune responses via bacterial metabolites and MAMPs.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > MECHANISMS BY WHICH THE MICROBIOTA PROMOTES HCC > HCC promotion via dysbiosis, bacterial metabolites and immunosuppression
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“At the same time, this treatment led to increased serum levels of deoxycholic acid (DCA), a secondary bile acid whose production depends on 7α-dehydroxylation of primary bile acids by the bacterial microbiota, notably Clostridium clusters.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > MECHANISMS BY WHICH THE MICROBIOTA PROMOTES HCC > HCC promotion via dysbiosis, bacterial metabolites and immunosuppression
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [15] Yoshimoto, S. et al. Obesity-induced gut microbial metabolite promotes liver cancer through senescence secretome. Nature 499, 97–101 (2013). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In addition to alterations in bacterial composition, there is evidence for bacterial overgrowth in the upper gastrointestinal tract, which in turn is associated with increased circulating LPS levels 87.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > MECHANISMS BY WHICH THE MICROBIOTA PROMOTES HCC > HCC promotion via dysbiosis, bacterial metabolites and immunosuppression
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [87] Bauer, T. M. et al. Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth in human cirrhosis is associated with systemic endotoxemia. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 97, 2364–2370 (2002). source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Increasing evidence supports a key role for dysbiosis in the development of CLD and HCC (FIG. 1).”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > MECHANISMS BY WHICH THE MICROBIOTA PROMOTES HCC > HCC promotion via dysbiosis, bacterial metabolites and immunosuppression
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“However, a recent small-scale study described differences in the gut microbiota between different types of underlying liver disease86.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > MECHANISMS BY WHICH THE MICROBIOTA PROMOTES HCC > HCC promotion via dysbiosis, bacterial metabolites and immunosuppression
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [86] Chen, Y. et al. Dysbiosis of small intestinal microbiota in liver cirrhosis and its association with etiology. Sci. Rep. 6, 34055 (2016). source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Therefore, the use of single antibiotics with a high safety profile in patients with CLD represents the only clinically feasible approach.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > TARGETING MICROBIOTA TO PREVENT HCC > Antibiotics
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Because antibiotics target several pathways through which the gut microbiota promote HCC development (Table 1), they could represent one of the most efficient strategies to interrupt the tumor-promoting gut liver axis in CLD”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > TARGETING MICROBIOTA TO PREVENT HCC > Antibiotics
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Table 1
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Similar to norfloxacin, rifaximin has been noted to increased survival in patients with advanced liver cirrhosis in several small-scale trials92–95.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > TARGETING MICROBIOTA TO PREVENT HCC > Antibiotics
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [92] Fernandez, J. et al. Primary prophylaxis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis delays hepatorenal syndrome and improves survival in cirrhosis. Gastroenterology 133, 818–824 (2007). source
- Not checked yetcites [93] Vlachogiannakos, J. et al. Long-term administration of rifaximin improves the prognosis of patients with decompensated alcoholic cirrhosis. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 28, 450–455 (2013). source
- Not checked yetcites [94] Elfert, A., Abo Ali, L., Soliman, S., Ibrahim, S. & Abd-Elsalam, S. Randomized-controlled trial of rifaximin versus norfloxacin for secondary prophylaxis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. Eur. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 28, 1450–1454 (2016). source
- Not checked yetcites [95] Sharma, B. C. et al. A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial comparing rifaximin plus lactulose with lactulose alone in treatment of overt hepatic encephalopathy. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 108, 1458–1463 (2013). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Clinical trials in patients with advanced cirrhosis have shown that long-term use of orally administered norfloxacin is safe, produces a marked reduction of gram-negative bacteria in the faecal microbiota109, reduces the 1-year probability of developing spontaneous bacterial peritonitis and hepatorenal syndrome and improves 3-month survival92.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > TARGETING MICROBIOTA TO PREVENT HCC > Antibiotics
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [109] Gines, P. et al. Norfloxacin prevents spontaneous bacterial peritonitis recurrence in cirrhosis: results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Hepatology 12, 716–724 (1990). source
- Not checked yetcites [92] Fernandez, J. et al. Primary prophylaxis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis delays hepatorenal syndrome and improves survival in cirrhosis. Gastroenterology 133, 818–824 (2007). source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“supported by a large number of studies preclinical studies showing a drastic (≈80%) reduction of HCC development in murine models13–15.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > TARGETING MICROBIOTA TO PREVENT HCC
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [13] Dapito, D. H. et al. Promotion of hepatocellular carcinoma by the intestinal microbiota and TLR4. Cancer Cell 21, 504–516 (2012). source
- Not checked yetcites [14] Yu, L. X. et al. Endotoxin accumulation prevents carcinogen-induced apoptosis and promotes liver tumorigenesis in rodents. Hepatology 52, 1322–1333 (2010). source
- Not checked yetcites [15] Yoshimoto, S. et al. Obesity-induced gut microbial metabolite promotes liver cancer through senescence secretome. Nature 499, 97–101 (2013). source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Moreover, this antibiotic cocktail also reduced liver fibrosis 73, which often precedes HCC and represents a risk factor for HCC development in CLD70.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > TARGETING MICROBIOTA TO PREVENT HCC > Antibiotics
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [73] Seki, E. et al. TLR4 enhances TGF-beta signaling and hepatic fibrosis. Nat. Med. 13, 1324–1332 (2007). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Moreover, several small-scale clinical studies have suggested that antibiotics such as norfloxacin and rifaximin increase survival in patients with liver cirrhosis92–95.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > TARGETING MICROBIOTA TO PREVENT HCC
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [92] Fernandez, J. et al. Primary prophylaxis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis delays hepatorenal syndrome and improves survival in cirrhosis. Gastroenterology 133, 818–824 (2007). source
- Not checked yetcites [93] Vlachogiannakos, J. et al. Long-term administration of rifaximin improves the prognosis of patients with decompensated alcoholic cirrhosis. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 28, 450–455 (2013). source
- Not checked yetcites [94] Elfert, A., Abo Ali, L., Soliman, S., Ibrahim, S. & Abd-Elsalam, S. Randomized-controlled trial of rifaximin versus norfloxacin for secondary prophylaxis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. Eur. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 28, 1450–1454 (2016). source
- Not checked yetcites [95] Sharma, B. C. et al. A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial comparing rifaximin plus lactulose with lactulose alone in treatment of overt hepatic encephalopathy. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 108, 1458–1463 (2013). source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Clinical trials in patients with advanced cirrhosis have shown that long-term use of orally administered norfloxacin is safe, produces a marked reduction of gram-negative bacteria in the faecal microbiota109, reduces the 1-year probability of developing spontaneous bacterial peritonitis and hepatorenal syndrome and improves 3-month survival92.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > TARGETING MICROBIOTA TO PREVENT HCC > Antibiotics
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [92] Fernandez, J. et al. Primary prophylaxis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis delays hepatorenal syndrome and improves survival in cirrhosis. Gastroenterology 133, 818–824 (2007). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Clinical trials in patients with advanced cirrhosis have shown that long-term use of orally administered norfloxacin is safe, produces a marked reduction of gram-negative bacteria in the faecal microbiota109, reduces the 1-year probability of developing spontaneous bacterial peritonitis and hepatorenal syndrome and improves 3-month survival92.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > TARGETING MICROBIOTA TO PREVENT HCC > Antibiotics
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [109] Gines, P. et al. Norfloxacin prevents spontaneous bacterial peritonitis recurrence in cirrhosis: results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Hepatology 12, 716–724 (1990). source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Of note, administration of antibiotics at late stages of carcinogenesis, when microscopic tumours already existed, was more efficient at reducing HCC in mice than administration at earlier stages13.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > TARGETING MICROBIOTA TO PREVENT HCC > Antibiotics
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [13] Dapito, D. H. et al. Promotion of hepatocellular carcinoma by the intestinal microbiota and TLR4. Cancer Cell 21, 504–516 (2012). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“preventative strategies that target the gut–liver axis seem most promising in patients with cirrhosis and at high risk for HCC development”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > TARGETING MICROBIOTA TO PREVENT HCC
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Moreover, targeting the gut microbiota-liver axis is unlikely to have a major effect on patients in which the gut–liver axis is not a dominant driver of disease progression, HCC development and mortality, for example those with perinatal HBV infection, high HBV titres and minimal liver fibrosis.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > TARGETING MICROBIOTA TO PREVENT HCC
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Continuous gut sterilization by a cocktail of oral antibiotics, consisting of ampicillin, neomycin, metronidazole and vancomycin, effectively reduced the number and size of HCC induced by DEN+CCl4 or DMBA+HFD in mice13,15.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > TARGETING MICROBIOTA TO PREVENT HCC > Antibiotics
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [13] Dapito, D. H. et al. Promotion of hepatocellular carcinoma by the intestinal microbiota and TLR4. Cancer Cell 21, 504–516 (2012). source
- Not checked yetcites [15] Yoshimoto, S. et al. Obesity-induced gut microbial metabolite promotes liver cancer through senescence secretome. Nature 499, 97–101 (2013). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Clinical trials in patients with advanced cirrhosis have shown that long-term use of orally administered norfloxacin is safe, produces a marked reduction of gram-negative bacteria in the faecal microbiota109, reduces the 1-year probability of developing spontaneous bacterial peritonitis and hepatorenal syndrome and improves 3-month survival92.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > TARGETING MICROBIOTA TO PREVENT HCC > Antibiotics
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [92] Fernandez, J. et al. Primary prophylaxis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis delays hepatorenal syndrome and improves survival in cirrhosis. Gastroenterology 133, 818–824 (2007). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Vancomycin, another antibiotic that has shown effectiveness as monotherapy in the prevention of HCC in the combined DMBA and high-fat diet mouse model15, is rarely used for long-term therapy in patients and may cause a number of potentially severe adverse effects.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > TARGETING MICROBIOTA TO PREVENT HCC > Antibiotics
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [15] Yoshimoto, S. et al. Obesity-induced gut microbial metabolite promotes liver cancer through senescence secretome. Nature 499, 97–101 (2013). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Moreover, HCC prevention with antibiotics would require long-term, possibly life-long administration.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > TARGETING MICROBIOTA TO PREVENT HCC > Antibiotics
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“At the same time, selective antibiotics might also block the production of HCC-promoting bacterial metabolites, such as DCA15, by reducing the number of bacteria that produce specific metabolites.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > TARGETING MICROBIOTA TO PREVENT HCC > Antibiotics
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [15] Yoshimoto, S. et al. Obesity-induced gut microbial metabolite promotes liver cancer through senescence secretome. Nature 499, 97–101 (2013). source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These data support the concept that HCC prevention by antibiotic treatment could be applied even at late stages, i.e. in patients with advanced cirrhosis and high risk for HCC development.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > TARGETING MICROBIOTA TO PREVENT HCC > Antibiotics
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“On the basis of its important contribution to CLD progression and hepatocarcinogenesis in particular, the gut-microbiota–liver axis represents a promising target for preventative approaches (FIG. 1).”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > TARGETING MICROBIOTA TO PREVENT HCC
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: No therapeutic options for HCC prevention exist other than treating the underlying liver disease.
- Rests on an assumption: No clinical studies have tested targeting the gut–microbiota–liver axis for HCC prevention.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In contrast to norfloxacin, clinically relevant development of resistance to rifaximin has not been reported, suggesting that it is well-suited for long-term or even life-long treatment.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > TARGETING MICROBIOTA TO PREVENT HCC > Antibiotics
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Clinically relevant resistance to rifaximin has not been reported.
In the paper
“Norfloxacin, a poorly absorbed quinolone, is currently one of the drugs of choice for the primary or secondary prophylaxis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis and infections in high-risk patients with cirrhosis 108.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > TARGETING MICROBIOTA TO PREVENT HCC > Antibiotics
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [108] Jalan, R. et al. Bacterial infections in cirrhosis: a position statement based on the EASL Special Conference 2013. J. Hepatol. 60, 1310–1324 (2014). source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Notably, these effects are attenuated after oral administration of bile acids in different experimental cirrhotic models20,134,135.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > TARGETING MICROBIOTA TO PREVENT HCC > Targeting the gut barrier
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [20] Inagaki, T. et al. Regulation of antibacterial defense in the small intestine by the nuclear bile acid receptor. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 3920–3925 (2006). source
- Not checked yetcites [134] Lorenzo-Zuniga, V. et al. Oral bile acids reduce bacterial overgrowth, bacterial translocation, and endotoxemia in cirrhotic rats. Hepatology 37, 551–557 (2003). source
- Not checked yetcites [135] Ding, J. W., Andersson, R., Soltesz, V., Willen, R. & Bengmark, S. The role of bile and bile acids in bacterial translocation in obstructive jaundice in rats. Eur. Surg. Res. 25, 11–19 (1993). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Increased production of TNF by monocytes in mesenteric lymph nodes constitutes one of the main factors increasing tight junction permeability145,146.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > TARGETING MICROBIOTA TO PREVENT HCC > Targeting the gut barrier
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [145] Munoz, L. et al. Mesenteric Th1 polarization and monocyte TNF-alpha production: first steps to systemic inflammation in rats with cirrhosis. Hepatology 42, 411–419 (2005). source
- Not checked yetcites [146] Genesca, J. et al. Increased tumour necrosis factor alpha production in mesenteric lymph nodes of cirrhotic patients with ascites. Gut 52, 1054–1059 (2003). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Currently, FMT is being evaluated in clinical trials for a number of additional diseases including NASH124 and cirrhosis125.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > TARGETING MICROBIOTA TO PREVENT HCC > FMT
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [124] US National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02496390 (2016).
- Not checked yetcites [125] US National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02862249 (2016).
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“targeting the gut barrier seems an attractive therapeutic approach (Table 1) that might avoid some of the complications of targeting the microbiota (such as development of resistance and/or decreased microbial diversity) or receptors that mediate the disease-promoting effects of a leaky gut (such as immunosuppression resulting from TLR4 antagonism.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > TARGETING MICROBIOTA TO PREVENT HCC > Targeting the gut barrier
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Table 1
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Although a large number of studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of probiotics in treating liver diseases both in animal models and in patients (reviewed elsewhere118,119), substantial controversy remains”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > TARGETING MICROBIOTA TO PREVENT HCC > Probiotics
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [118] Natividad, J. M. & Verdu, E. F. Modulation of intestinal barrier by intestinal microbiota: pathological and therapeutic implications. Pharmacol. Res. 69, 42–51 (2013). source
- Not checked yetcites [119] Cesaro, C. et al. Gut microbiota and probiotics in chronic liver diseases. Dig. Liver Dis. 43, 431–438 (2011). source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Many of the hepatic effects of FXR activation are mediated by intestinal FXR receptors, resulting in the release of FGF19, which then acts on targets in the liver136–139.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > TARGETING MICROBIOTA TO PREVENT HCC > Targeting the gut barrier
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [136] Schaap, F. G., Trauner, M. & Jansen, P. L. Bile acid receptors as targets for drug development. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 11, 55–67 (2014). source
- Not checked yetcites [137] Thomas, C., Pellicciari, R., Pruzanski, M., Auwerx, J. & Schoonjans, K. Targeting bile-acid signalling for metabolic diseases. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 7, 678–693 (2008). source
- Not checked yetcites [138] Degirolamo, C. et al. Prevention of spontaneous hepatocarcinogenesis in farnesoid X receptor-null mice by intestinal-specific farnesoid X receptor reactivation. Hepatology 61, 161–170 (2015). source
- Not checked yetcites [139] Marschall, H.-U. et al. The farnesoid X receptor (FXR) agonist (OCA) increases plasma FGF-19 concentrations and decreases bile acid synthesis in primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC). J. Hepatol. 56, S377 (2012). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Moreover, OCA improves portal hypertension (which might contribute to bacterial translocation in cirrhosis) in thioacetamide- or bile duct ligation-treated rats143.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > TARGETING MICROBIOTA TO PREVENT HCC > Targeting the gut barrier
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [143] Verbeke, L. et al. Obeticholic acid, a farnesoid X receptor agonist, improves portal hypertension by two distinct pathways in cirrhotic rats. Hepatology 59, 2286–2298 (2014). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“On the basis of these findings, blocking the TLR4 pathway might represent another avenue for HCC prevention (Table 1).”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > TARGETING MICROBIOTA TO PREVENT HCC > TLR antagonists
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Table 1
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Another randomized trial showed that 4-month supplementation with VSL#3 improves NAFLD in children122.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > TARGETING MICROBIOTA TO PREVENT HCC > Probiotics
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [122] Alisi, A. et al. Randomised clinical trial: the beneficial effects of VSL#3 in obese children with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 39, 1276–1285 (2014). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Several studies have shown a key role for the TLR4 pathway as a mediator of the disease-promoting effects of the gut–liver axis in CLD and hepatocarcinogenesis13,14,73.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > TARGETING MICROBIOTA TO PREVENT HCC > TLR antagonists
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [13] Dapito, D. H. et al. Promotion of hepatocellular carcinoma by the intestinal microbiota and TLR4. Cancer Cell 21, 504–516 (2012). source
- Not checked yetcites [14] Yu, L. X. et al. Endotoxin accumulation prevents carcinogen-induced apoptosis and promotes liver tumorigenesis in rodents. Hepatology 52, 1322–1333 (2010). source
- Not checked yetcites [73] Seki, E. et al. TLR4 enhances TGF-beta signaling and hepatic fibrosis. Nat. Med. 13, 1324–1332 (2007). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“A randomized controlled trial demonstrated amelioration of hepatic and peripheral insulin resistance in patients with metabolic syndrome who had received microbiota from lean donors126.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > TARGETING MICROBIOTA TO PREVENT HCC > FMT
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [126] Vrieze, A. et al. Transfer of intestinal microbiota from lean donors increases insulin sensitivity in individuals with metabolic syndrome. Gastroenterology 143, 913–916.e7 (2012). source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Decreased bile secretion in rodents by either ligation of the common bile duct or induction of cirrhosis contributes to bacterial translocation, which is not only caused by intestinal bacterial overgrowth but also by increased gut permeability20,28,134.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > TARGETING MICROBIOTA TO PREVENT HCC > Targeting the gut barrier
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [20] Inagaki, T. et al. Regulation of antibacterial defense in the small intestine by the nuclear bile acid receptor. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 3920–3925 (2006). source
- Not checked yetcites [28] Fouts, D. E., Torralba, M., Nelson, K. E., Brenner, D. A. & Schnabl, B. Bacterial translocation and changes in the intestinal microbiome in mouse models of liver disease. J. Hepatol. 56, 1283–1292 (2012). source
- Not checked yetcites [134] Lorenzo-Zuniga, V. et al. Oral bile acids reduce bacterial overgrowth, bacterial translocation, and endotoxemia in cirrhotic rats. Hepatology 37, 551–557 (2003). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“On the basis that the leaky gut is a major driver of liver disease progression and HCC development (FIG. 1), targeting the gut barrier seems an attractive therapeutic approach (Table 1)”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > TARGETING MICROBIOTA TO PREVENT HCC > Targeting the gut barrier
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites FIG. 1
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
In the paper
“Another factor that contributes to intestinal bacteria overgrowth in liver cirrhosis is gut dysmotility149.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > TARGETING MICROBIOTA TO PREVENT HCC > Prokinetics
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [149] Kalaitzakis, E. Gastrointestinal dysfunction in liver cirrhosis. World J. Gastroenterol. 20, 14686–14695 (2014). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Owing to these adverse effects, long-term anti-TNF therapy might confer more harm than benefit, and further efforts need to be made to develop therapies that act locally to improve gut barrier function without negatively affecting systemic immune responses.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > TARGETING MICROBIOTA TO PREVENT HCC > Targeting the gut barrier
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Interestingly, a retrospective long-term observational study suggests that propranolol treatment might decrease HCC occurrence in patients with HCV cirrhosis158, suggesting a potential role for HCC prevention.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > TARGETING MICROBIOTA TO PREVENT HCC > Prokinetics
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [158] Nkontchou, G. et al. Effect of long-term propranolol treatment on hepatocellular carcinoma incidence in patients with HCV-associated cirrhosis. Cancer Prev. Res. (Phila.) 5, 1007–1014 (2012). source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Overwhelming evidence from the past three decades support a key contribution of the gut microbiota to multiple aspects of liver disease progression, thereby contributing to a hepatic environment that promotes that development and progression of HCC.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > CONCLUSIONS
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
In the paper
“TNF increases tight junction permeability by decreasing expression of tight junction proteins as well as by activating myosin light chain kinase (MLCK)147.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > TARGETING MICROBIOTA TO PREVENT HCC > Targeting the gut barrier
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [147] Taylor, C. T., Dzus, A. L. & Colgan, S. P. Autocrine regulation of epithelial permeability by hypoxia: role for polarized release of tumor necrosis factor alpha. Gastroenterology 114, 657–668 (1998). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Treatment with an anti-TNF monoclonal antibody decreases the incidence of bacterial translocation in experimental cirrhosis in rats148.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > TARGETING MICROBIOTA TO PREVENT HCC > Targeting the gut barrier
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [148] Frances, R. et al. Bacterial translocation is downregulated by anti-TNF-alpha monoclonal antibody administration in rats with cirrhosis and ascites. J. Hepatol. 46, 797–803 (2007). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- It may state two separate claims as one. 72
- Probably not a substantial claim. 9
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“However, additional factors are involved and each type of underlying liver disease entails a specific risk for the development of HCC in cirrhosis; diseases such as chronic hepatitis B and C or haemochromatosis entail a relatively high risk and diseases such as autoimmune hepatitis or ALD a relatively low risk38–40.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > GUT MICROBIOTA AND DISEASE PROGRESSION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [38] El-Serag, H. B. Hepatocellular carcinoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 365, 1118–1127 (2011). source
- Not checked yetcites [39] Sanyal, A. J., Yoon, S. K. & Lencioni, R. The etiology of hepatocellular carcinoma and consequences for treatment. Oncologist 15 (Suppl. 4), 14–22 (2010). source
- Not checked yetcites [40] Singal, A. G. & El-Serag, H. B. Hepatocellular carcinoma from epidemiology to prevention: translating knowledge into practice. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 13, 2140–2151 (2015). source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Studies in the past few years have demonstrated profound alterations of the intestinal microbiota in patients with cirrhosis, showing increased Enterobacteriacea as well as strains that are typically found in the oral microbiota, such as Veillonellaceae and Streptococcaceae, consistent with an invasion of microorganisms from the mouth to the gut in liver cirrhosis32,33.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > THE INTESTINAL EPITHELIAL BARRIER
What the sources say
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Likewise, a number of studies have demonstrated alterations of the gut microbiota in earlier stages of liver disease 35,36 as well as in animal models16,31.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > THE INTESTINAL EPITHELIAL BARRIER
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [35] Mouzaki, M. et al. Bile acids and dysbiosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. PLoS ONE 11, e0151829 (2016). source
- Not checked yetcites [36] Boursier, J. et al. The severity of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease is associated with gut dysbiosis and shift in the metabolic function of the gut microbiota. Hepatology 63, 764–775 (2016). source
- Not checked yetcites [16] Pradere, J. P., Troeger, J. S., Dapito, D. H., Mencin, A. A. & Schwabe, R. F. Toll-like receptor 4 and hepatic fibrogenesis. Semin. Liver Dis. 30, 232–244 (2010). source
- Not checked yetcites [31] Wiest, R. & Garcia-Tsao, G. Bacterial translocation (BT) in cirrhosis. Hepatology 41, 422–433 (2005). source
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Moreover, mice receiving intragastric alcohol feeding show perturbations of the intestinal microbiota, with reduced synthesis of long-chain fatty acids44.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > GUT MICROBIOTA AND DISEASE PROGRESSION > ALD
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [44] Chen, P. et al. Supplementation of saturated long-chain fatty acids maintains intestinal eubiosis and reduces ethanol-induced liver injury in mice. Gastroenterology 148, 203–214.e16 (2015). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Although ALD might have a lower relative risk of causing HCC than other types of CLD39, the sheer number of patients with alcoholic cirrhosis means that the absolute number of HCCs caused by ALD is high.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > GUT MICROBIOTA AND DISEASE PROGRESSION > ALD
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [39] Sanyal, A. J., Yoon, S. K. & Lencioni, R. The etiology of hepatocellular carcinoma and consequences for treatment. Oncologist 15 (Suppl. 4), 14–22 (2010). source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Increases in blood LPS levels reflect gut leakiness and are mirrored by a number of other alterations such as increased intestinal permeability to high molecular weight polyethylene glycol in patients with ALD26 and to FITC-dextran in mouse models of alcoholic and biliary liver disease27,28.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > THE INTESTINAL EPITHELIAL BARRIER
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [26] Parlesak, A., Schafer, C., Schutz, T., Bode, J. C. & Bode, C. Increased intestinal permeability to macromolecules and endotoxemia in patients with chronic alcohol abuse in different stages of alcohol-induced liver disease. J. Hepatol. 32, 742–747 (2000). source
- Not checked yetcites [27] Yan, A. W. et al. Enteric dysbiosis associated with a mouse model of alcoholic liver disease. Hepatology 53, 96–105 (2011). source
- Not checked yetcites [28] Fouts, D. E., Torralba, M., Nelson, K. E., Brenner, D. A. & Schnabl, B. Bacterial translocation and changes in the intestinal microbiome in mouse models of liver disease. J. Hepatol. 56, 1283–1292 (2012). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“These changes seem to develop progressively, as cirrhosis stage is positively correlated with Enterobacteriaceae and negatively correlated with Lachnospiraceae33,34.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > THE INTESTINAL EPITHELIAL BARRIER
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [33] Chen, Y. et al. Characterization of fecal microbial communities in patients with liver cirrhosis. Hepatology 54, 562–572 (2011). source
- Not checked yetcites [34] Bajaj, J. S., Betrapally, N. S. & Gillevet, P. M. Decompensated cirrhosis and microbiome interpretation. Nature 525, E1–E2 (2015). source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“However, a failing gut barrier and alterations of the gut microbiota in chronic liver disease (CLD) contribute to chronic inflammation and the progression of liver diseases12, and thereby increase risk for the development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) as the final stage of the disease process 13–15.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [12] Schnabl, B. & Brenner, D. A. Interactions between the intestinal microbiome and liver diseases. Gastroenterology 146, 1513–1524 (2014). source
- Not checked yetcites [13] Dapito, D. H. et al. Promotion of hepatocellular carcinoma by the intestinal microbiota and TLR4. Cancer Cell 21, 504–516 (2012). source
- Not checked yetcites [14] Yu, L. X. et al. Endotoxin accumulation prevents carcinogen-induced apoptosis and promotes liver tumorigenesis in rodents. Hepatology 52, 1322–1333 (2010). source
- Not checked yetcites [15] Yoshimoto, S. et al. Obesity-induced gut microbial metabolite promotes liver cancer through senescence secretome. Nature 499, 97–101 (2013). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The multi-layer intestinal barrier normally keeps hepatic exposure to pro-inflammatory microbe-associated molecular patterns minimal.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“These pro-inflammatory mediators not only promote the development of CLD but also set the stage for the development of HCC13–15.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > THE INTESTINAL EPITHELIAL BARRIER
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [13] Dapito, D. H. et al. Promotion of hepatocellular carcinoma by the intestinal microbiota and TLR4. Cancer Cell 21, 504–516 (2012). source
- Not checked yetcites [14] Yu, L. X. et al. Endotoxin accumulation prevents carcinogen-induced apoptosis and promotes liver tumorigenesis in rodents. Hepatology 52, 1322–1333 (2010). source
- Not checked yetcites [15] Yoshimoto, S. et al. Obesity-induced gut microbial metabolite promotes liver cancer through senescence secretome. Nature 499, 97–101 (2013). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“ALD contributes to about half of all cirrhosis cases41 and is a cofactor in liver disease induced by HBV, HCV and NASH.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > GUT MICROBIOTA AND DISEASE PROGRESSION > ALD
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [41] Gao, B. & Bataller, R. Alcoholic liver disease: pathogenesis and new therapeutic targets. Gastroenterology 141, 1572–1585 (2011). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Moreover, ~80–90% of HCCs occur in advanced fibrotic or cirrhotic livers, which translates to around one in three patients with compensated liver cirrhosis developing HCC in their lifetimes37,38.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > GUT MICROBIOTA AND DISEASE PROGRESSION
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Hepatocellular carcinoma almost exclusively develops in patients with chronic liver disease and almost never occurs spontaneously without liver disease.
In the paper
“Although recognized as a disease only about two decades ago, NAFLD represents the most prevalent liver disease, and is projected to become the leading contributor to CLD and the development of HCC51.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > GUT MICROBIOTA AND DISEASE PROGRESSION > NAFLD
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [51] Michelotti, G. A., Machado, M. V. & Diehl, A. M. NAFLD, NASH and liver cancer. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 10, 656–665 (2013). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“However, bacterial abundance patterns were not consistent between studies, with levels of Bacteroidetes increased in some studies36,56 and decreased in other studies57,58, and a substantial overlap with healthy individuals59.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > GUT MICROBIOTA AND DISEASE PROGRESSION > NAFLD
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [36] Boursier, J. et al. The severity of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease is associated with gut dysbiosis and shift in the metabolic function of the gut microbiota. Hepatology 63, 764–775 (2016). source
- Not checked yetcites [56] Zhu, L. et al. Characterization of gut microbiomes in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) patients: a connection between endogenous alcohol and NASH. Hepatology 57, 601–609 (2013). source
- Not checked yetcites [57] Del Chierico, F. et al. Gut microbiota profiling of pediatric NAFLD and obese patients unveiled by an integrated meta-omics based approach. Hepatology 65, 451–464 (2016). source
- Not checked yetcites [58] Mouzaki, M. et al. Intestinal microbiota in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology 58, 120–127 (2013). source
- Not checked yetcites [59] Leung, C., Rivera, L., Furness, J. B. & Angus, P. W. The role of the gut microbiota in NAFLD. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 13, 412–425 (2016). source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“These low levels of phosphatidylcholine impaired secretion of VLDL, thereby reducing hepatic lipid export and contributing to fatty liver61.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > GUT MICROBIOTA AND DISEASE PROGRESSION > NAFLD
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [61] Jiang, X. C. et al. Phospholipid transfer protein deficiency impairs apolipoprotein-B secretion from hepatocytes by stimulating a proteolytic pathway through a relative deficiency of vitamin E and an increase in intracellular oxidants. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 18336–18340 (2005). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Metagenomic and microbiota transplantation studies have shown that the gut microbiota from obese individuals is more efficient at energy extraction and thereby contributes to obesity53,54.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > GUT MICROBIOTA AND DISEASE PROGRESSION > NAFLD
What the sources say
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“This finding fits well with the well-established clinical observation that alcohol abuse is an important cofactor in promoting liver disease development and HCC in patients with chronic HCV infection 50 and suggests a potential role for the LPS–TLR4 axis in the synergy between alcohol and HCV.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > GUT MICROBIOTA AND DISEASE PROGRESSION > ALD
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [50] Siu, L., Foont, J. & Wands, J. R. Hepatitis C virus and alcohol. Semin. Liver Dis. 29, 188–199 (2009). source
boostedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“However, recent studies have demonstrated an increase in liver fibrosis in germ-free mice75,76, which seemingly contradicts the decrease of liver fibrosis seen in gut-sterilized mice.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > GUT MICROBIOTA AND DISEASE PROGRESSION > Liver fibrosis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [75] Mazagova, M. et al. Commensal microbiota is hepatoprotective and prevents liver fibrosis in mice. FASEB J. 29, 1043–1055 (2015). source
- Not checked yetcites [76] Tabibian, J. H. et al. Absence of the intestinal microbiota exacerbates hepatobiliary disease in a murine model of primary sclerosing cholangitis. Hepatology 63, 185–196 (2016). source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“It has become apparent that the endogenous commensal microbiota provides hepatoprotective signals and that complete absence of the gut microbiota results in increased liver injury — probably owing to an absence of TLR4-mediated activation of anti-apoptotic NF-κB signalling — and a subsequent increase in liver fibrosis, as demonstrated in several models13,75,76.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > GUT MICROBIOTA AND DISEASE PROGRESSION > Liver fibrosis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [13] Dapito, D. H. et al. Promotion of hepatocellular carcinoma by the intestinal microbiota and TLR4. Cancer Cell 21, 504–516 (2012). source
- Not checked yetcites [75] Mazagova, M. et al. Commensal microbiota is hepatoprotective and prevents liver fibrosis in mice. FASEB J. 29, 1043–1055 (2015). source
- Not checked yetcites [76] Tabibian, J. H. et al. Absence of the intestinal microbiota exacerbates hepatobiliary disease in a murine model of primary sclerosing cholangitis. Hepatology 63, 185–196 (2016). source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Global TLR4 deficiency in mice as well as gut sterilization with nonabsorbable antibiotics in rats reduces hepatic steatosis, oxidative stress and inflammation46–48.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > GUT MICROBIOTA AND DISEASE PROGRESSION > ALD
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [46] Uesugi, T., Froh, M., Arteel, G. E., Bradford, B. U. & Thurman, R. G. Toll-like receptor 4 is involved in the mechanism of early alcohol-induced liver injury in mice. Hepatology 34, 101–108 (2001). source
- Not checked yetcites [47] Hritz, I. et al. The critical role of toll-like receptor (TLR) 4 in alcoholic liver disease is independent of the common TLR adapter MyD88. Hepatology 48, 1224–1231 (2008). source
- Not checked yetcites [48] Adachi, Y., Moore, L. E., Bradford, B. U., Gao, W. & Thurman, R. G. Antibiotics prevent liver injury in rats following long-term exposure to ethanol. Gastroenterology 108, 218–224 (1995). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In one study, ethanol-fed transgenic mice with global TLR4 deficiency, which additionally expressed the NS5A HCV protein, were protected from HCC development, suggesting that TLR4 signalling synergizes with HCV to promote HCC49.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > GUT MICROBIOTA AND DISEASE PROGRESSION > ALD
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [49] Machida, K. et al. Toll-like receptor 4 mediates synergism between alcohol and HCV in hepatic oncogenesis involving stem cell marker Nanog. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 1548–1553 (2009). source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“High-fat diet increases intestinal permeability in mice with a two-to-three-fold increase in systemic LPS levels62.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > GUT MICROBIOTA AND DISEASE PROGRESSION > NAFLD
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [62] Cani, P. D. et al. Metabolic endotoxemia initiates obesity and insulin resistance. Diabetes 56, 1761–1772 (2007). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A recent study demonstrated that the gut microbiota controls immune responses and tolerance to HBV in adult mice, with 6 weeks of antibiotic treatment preventing the clearance of HBV68.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > GUT MICROBIOTA AND DISEASE PROGRESSION > Chronic viral hepatitis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [68] Chou, H. H. et al. Age-related immune clearance of hepatitis B virus infection requires the establishment of gut microbiota. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 2175–2180 (2015). source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Nonetheless, the bacterial microbiota has an important role in promoting HCC in the setting of liver fibrosis, as demonstrated by reduced HCC formation in TLR4-deficient, germ-free and antibiotic-treated mice in a diethylnitrosamine (DEN) plus CCl4 model of HCC13.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > GUT MICROBIOTA AND DISEASE PROGRESSION > Liver fibrosis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [13] Dapito, D. H. et al. Promotion of hepatocellular carcinoma by the intestinal microbiota and TLR4. Cancer Cell 21, 504–516 (2012). source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In comparison to other CLDs, NAFLD carries a low relative individual risk for HCC development, but makes a big population-wide contribution to HCC development owing to its high prevalence51.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > GUT MICROBIOTA AND DISEASE PROGRESSION > NAFLD
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [51] Michelotti, G. A., Machado, M. V. & Diehl, A. M. NAFLD, NASH and liver cancer. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 10, 656–665 (2013). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Studies from the past six decades have shown that antibiotics prevent hepatic injury and fibrosis induced by CCl4 treatment, bile duct ligation or a choline-deficient diet, and that endotoxin enhances hepatic fibrosis induced by a choline-deficient diet71–73.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > GUT MICROBIOTA AND DISEASE PROGRESSION > Liver fibrosis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [71] Luckey, T. D., Reyniers, J. A., Gyorgy, P. & Forbes, M. Germfree animals and liver necrosis. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 57, 932–935 (1954). source
- Not checked yetcites [72] Rutenburg, A. M. et al. The role of intestinal bacteria in the development of dietary cirrhosis in rats. J. Exp. Med. 106, 1–14 (1957). source
- Not checked yetcites [73] Seki, E. et al. TLR4 enhances TGF-beta signaling and hepatic fibrosis. Nat. Med. 13, 1324–1332 (2007). source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In the MCD diet model, the microbiota has a key role in NASH exacerbation as demonstrated by experiments, in which co-housing transmitted NASH risk and antibiotics reduced NASH risk65.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > GUT MICROBIOTA AND DISEASE PROGRESSION > NAFLD
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [65] Henao-Mejia, J. et al. Inflammasome-mediated dysbiosis regulates progression of NAFLD and obesity. Nature 482, 179–185 (2012). source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Epiregulin is an epidermal growth factor family member with a potent mitogenic effect on hepatocytes82.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > MECHANISMS BY WHICH THE MICROBIOTA PROMOTES HCC > HCC promotion via a leaky gut and the MAMP–TLR axis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [82] Toyoda, H. et al. Epiregulin. A novel epidermal growth factor with mitogenic activity for rat primary hepatocytes. J. Biol. Chem. 270, 7495–7500 (1995). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Recent studies have demonstrated differences in the duodenal and salivary microbiota between healthy controls and patients with cirrhosis86,88, suggesting that there are also qualitative and quantitative changes in the upper gastrointestinal tract that might be linked to changes in the more distal microbiota and contribute to the pathophysiology of CLD as well as the development of HCC.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > MECHANISMS BY WHICH THE MICROBIOTA PROMOTES HCC > HCC promotion via dysbiosis, bacterial metabolites and immunosuppression
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [86] Chen, Y. et al. Dysbiosis of small intestinal microbiota in liver cirrhosis and its association with etiology. Sci. Rep. 6, 34055 (2016). source
- Not checked yetcites [88] Bajaj, J. S. et al. Salivary microbiota reflects changes in gut microbiota in cirrhosis with hepatic encephalopathy. Hepatology 62, 1260–1271 (2015). source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The finding that the intestinal microbiota of patients with compensated cirrhosis differs from that of patients with decompensated cirrhosis34 suggests that cirrhosis stage, rather than the underlying liver disease, drives gut microbiota changes.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > MECHANISMS BY WHICH THE MICROBIOTA PROMOTES HCC > HCC promotion via dysbiosis, bacterial metabolites and immunosuppression
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [34] Bajaj, J. S., Betrapally, N. S. & Gillevet, P. M. Decompensated cirrhosis and microbiome interpretation. Nature 525, E1–E2 (2015). source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In addition, TLR4 activation in HCC cell lines by LPS enhances their invasive potential and induces the epithelial–mesenchymal transition83.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > MECHANISMS BY WHICH THE MICROBIOTA PROMOTES HCC > HCC promotion via a leaky gut and the MAMP–TLR axis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [83] Jing, Y. Y. et al. Toll-like receptor 4 signaling promotes epithelial-mesenchymal transition in human hepatocellular carcinoma induced by lipopolysaccharide. BMC Med. 10, 98 (2012). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Key changes in the composition of the intestinal microbiota in cirrhosis include enrichment of Veillonella or Streptococcus as well as decreased bacteria from the order Clostridiales32.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > MECHANISMS BY WHICH THE MICROBIOTA PROMOTES HCC > HCC promotion via dysbiosis, bacterial metabolites and immunosuppression
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [32] Qin, N. et al. Alterations of the human gut microbiome in liver cirrhosis. Nature 513, 59–64 (2014). source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“As such, perturbation of the gut eubiosis by penicillin increased HCC formation in rats77, which could be suppressed by probiotics77.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > MECHANISMS BY WHICH THE MICROBIOTA PROMOTES HCC > HCC promotion via dysbiosis, bacterial metabolites and immunosuppression
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [77] Zhang, H. L. et al. Profound impact of gut homeostasis on chemically-induced pro-tumorigenic inflammation and hepatocarcinogenesis in rats. J. Hepatol. 57, 803–812 (2012). source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Of note, the majority of the patient-enriched species were of buccal origin, suggesting an invasion of the gut from the mouth in liver cirrhosis32.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > MECHANISMS BY WHICH THE MICROBIOTA PROMOTES HCC > HCC promotion via dysbiosis, bacterial metabolites and immunosuppression
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [32] Qin, N. et al. Alterations of the human gut microbiome in liver cirrhosis. Nature 513, 59–64 (2014). source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Dysbiosis (discussed below) and the leaky gut are probably intimately linked; it is likely that intestinal dysbiosis contributes to a leaky gut by multiple mechanisms, such as dysbiosis-induced alterations of the intestinal barrier as well as a shift to bacterial species with increased propensity to translocate.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > MECHANISMS BY WHICH THE MICROBIOTA PROMOTES HCC > HCC promotion via a leaky gut and the MAMP–TLR axis
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Recent evidence suggests that the effects of dysbiosis on the development of liver disease and HCC are mediated by bacterial metabolites, possibly in a disease-specific manner.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > MECHANISMS BY WHICH THE MICROBIOTA PROMOTES HCC > HCC promotion via dysbiosis, bacterial metabolites and immunosuppression
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In one study, high-fat diet feeding in mice resulted in dysbiosis, with increased abundance of Gram-negative bacteria and a reduced ratio of Bacteroidetes to Firmicutes . Transplantation of these dysbiotic microbiota into control-diet-fed mice that had undergone bile duct ligation increased liver damage and fibrosis in the recipient89.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > MECHANISMS BY WHICH THE MICROBIOTA PROMOTES HCC > HCC promotion via dysbiosis, bacterial metabolites and immunosuppression
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [89] De Minicis, S. et al. Dysbiosis contributes to fibrogenesis in the course of chronic liver injury in mice. Hepatology 59, 1738–1749 (2014). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Likewise, disruption of the gut barrier by administration of dextran sulfate sodium not only results in increased systemic LPS levels and increased liver fibrosis, but also promotes HCC formation in mice80,81.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > MECHANISMS BY WHICH THE MICROBIOTA PROMOTES HCC > HCC promotion via a leaky gut and the MAMP–TLR axis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [80] Gabele, E. et al. DSS induced colitis increases portal LPS levels and enhances hepatic inflammation and fibrogenesis in experimental NASH. J. Hepatol. 55, 1391–1399 (2011). source
- Not checked yetcites [81] Achiwa, K. et al. DSS colitis promotes tumorigenesis and fibrogenesis in a choline-deficient high-fat diet-induced NASH mouse model. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 470, 15–21 (2016). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The gut microbiomes of patients with advanced liver disease and cirrhosis are characterized by an increase in potentially pathogenic bacteria, along with reduced numbers of bacteria with beneficial properties32,84,85.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > MECHANISMS BY WHICH THE MICROBIOTA PROMOTES HCC > HCC promotion via dysbiosis, bacterial metabolites and immunosuppression
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [32] Qin, N. et al. Alterations of the human gut microbiome in liver cirrhosis. Nature 513, 59–64 (2014). source
- Not checked yetcites [84] Wei, X. et al. Cirrhosis related functionality characteristic of the fecal microbiota as revealed by a metaproteomic approach. BMC Gastroenterol. 16, 121 (2016). source
- Not checked yetcites [85] Lv, L. X. et al. Alterations and correlations of the gut microbiome, metabolism and immunity in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis. Environ. Microbiol. 18, 2272–2286 (2016). source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“One example is the production of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), which are a primary energy source for intestinal epithelial cells91”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > MECHANISMS BY WHICH THE MICROBIOTA PROMOTES HCC > HCC promotion via dysbiosis, bacterial metabolites and immunosuppression
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [91] Lee, W. J. & Hase, K. Gut microbiota-generated metabolites in animal health and disease. Nat. Chem. Biol. 10, 416–424 (2014). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Although these data show that norfloxacin can effectively reduce small intestinal bacteria overgrowth and bacterial translocation in patients with advanced cirrhosis, the effects of norfloxacin on HCC development in patients with liver cirrhosis are not known.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > TARGETING MICROBIOTA TO PREVENT HCC > Antibiotics
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The effects of norfloxacin on HCC development in patients with liver cirrhosis are unknown.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Decreasing the overall number of bacteria in the gut and eliminating bacteria that have a high ability to translocate will reduce bacterial translocation and thereby inhibit proinflammatory signals coming from leaky gut.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > TARGETING MICROBIOTA TO PREVENT HCC > Antibiotics
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis98 and hepatic encephalopathy99 in patients.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > TARGETING MICROBIOTA TO PREVENT HCC
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [98] Lutz, P. et al. Impact of rifaximin on the frequency and characteristics of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in patients with liver cirrhosis and ascites. PLoS ONE 9, e93909 (2014). source
- Not checked yetcites [99] Bass, N. M. et al. Rifaximin treatment in hepatic encephalopathy. N. Engl. J. Med. 362, 1071–1081 (2010). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Moreover, rifaximin appears to reduce the development of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis and may improve portal hypertension, suggesting that it effectively targets the gut–liver axis in advanced liver disease93,114,115.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > TARGETING MICROBIOTA TO PREVENT HCC > Antibiotics
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [93] Vlachogiannakos, J. et al. Long-term administration of rifaximin improves the prognosis of patients with decompensated alcoholic cirrhosis. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 28, 450–455 (2013). source
- Not checked yetcites [114] Vlachogiannakos, J. et al. Intestinal decontamination improves liver haemodynamics in patients with alcohol-related decompensated cirrhosis. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 29, 992–999 (2009). source
- Not checked yetcites [115] Kalambokis, G. N. et al. Rifaximin improves systemic hemodynamics and renal function in patients with alcohol-related cirrhosis and ascites. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 10, 815–818 (2012). source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“However, findings from mice cannot be translated directly to patients as long-term administration of the employed antibiotic cocktail would be deleterious due to the depletion of almost all detectable commensal microbiota (>99.5%)73,104 and the inclusion of nephrotoxic drugs, such as neomycin.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > TARGETING MICROBIOTA TO PREVENT HCC > Antibiotics
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [73] Seki, E. et al. TLR4 enhances TGF-beta signaling and hepatic fibrosis. Nat. Med. 13, 1324–1332 (2007). source
- Not checked yetcites [104] Rakoff-Nahoum, S., Paglino, J., Eslami-Varzaneh, F., Edberg, S. & Medzhitov, R. Recognition of commensal microflora by toll-like receptors is required for intestinal homeostasis. Cell 118, 229–241 (2004). source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“targeting the gut-microbiota–liver axis has been shown to reduce liver fibrosis 73,96 and portal hypertension97 in rodents”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > TARGETING MICROBIOTA TO PREVENT HCC
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [73] Seki, E. et al. TLR4 enhances TGF-beta signaling and hepatic fibrosis. Nat. Med. 13, 1324–1332 (2007). source
- Not checked yetcites [96] Zhu, Q. et al. Intestinal decontamination inhibits TLR4 dependent fibronectin-mediated cross-talk between stellate cells and endothelial cells in liver fibrosis in mice. J. Hepatol. 56, 893–899 (2012). source
- Not checked yetcites [97] Steib, C. J. et al. Intraperitoneal LPS amplifies portal hypertension in rat liver fibrosis. Lab. Invest. 90, 1024–1032 (2010). source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“As data from murine studies show that non-absorbable antibiotics and norfloxacin improve ALD48,116 and insulin resistance in NAFLD117, they might be particularly attractive for HCC prevention in these patient groups.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > TARGETING MICROBIOTA TO PREVENT HCC > Antibiotics
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [48] Adachi, Y., Moore, L. E., Bradford, B. U., Gao, W. & Thurman, R. G. Antibiotics prevent liver injury in rats following long-term exposure to ethanol. Gastroenterology 108, 218–224 (1995). source
- Not checked yetcites [116] Chen, P., Starkel, P., Turner, J. R., Ho, S. B. & Schnabl, B. Dysbiosis-induced intestinal inflammation activates tumor necrosis factor receptor I and mediates alcoholic liver disease in mice. Hepatology 61, 883–894 (2015). source
- Not checked yetcites [117] Membrez, M. et al. Gut microbiota modulation with norfloxacin and ampicillin enhances glucose tolerance in mice. FASEB J. 22, 2416–2426 (2008). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Of note, rifaximin reduces HCC development in the DEN–CCl4 model of HCC, albeit less efficiently than the quadruple antibiotics cocktail described above13.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > TARGETING MICROBIOTA TO PREVENT HCC > Antibiotics
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [13] Dapito, D. H. et al. Promotion of hepatocellular carcinoma by the intestinal microbiota and TLR4. Cancer Cell 21, 504–516 (2012). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Moreover, this antibiotic cocktail also reduced liver fibrosis 73, which often precedes HCC and represents a risk factor for HCC development in CLD70.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > TARGETING MICROBIOTA TO PREVENT HCC > Antibiotics
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [70] Affo, S., Yu, L. X. & Schwabe, R. F. The role of cancer-associated fibroblasts and fibrosis in liver cancer. Annu. Rev. Pathol. 12, 153–186 (2017). source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Gram-negative bacteria have been found to be the most adept at translocating to the mesenteric lymph nodes and are the most frequent cause of spontaneous bacterial infections in patients with cirrhosis105–107.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > TARGETING MICROBIOTA TO PREVENT HCC > Antibiotics
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [105] Steffen, E. K., Berg, R. D. & Deitch, E. A. Comparison of translocation rates of various indigenous bacteria from the gastrointestinal tract to the mesenteric lymph node. J. Infect. Dis. 157, 1032–1038 (1988). source
- Not checked yetcites [106] Navasa, M. et al. Randomized, comparative study of oral ofloxacin versus intravenous cefotaxime in spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. Gastroenterology 111, 1011–1017 (1996). source
- Not checked yetcites [107] Bert, F. et al. Genetic diversity and virulence profiles of Escherichia coli isolates causing spontaneous bacterial peritonitis and bacteremia in patients with cirrhosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 48, 2709–2714 (2010). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Currently, two antibiotics, norfloxacin and rifaximin, have shown beneficial effects in patients with CLD or murine HCC models and fulfill these criteria.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > TARGETING MICROBIOTA TO PREVENT HCC > Antibiotics
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Rifaximin is a nonabsorbable antibiotic with broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity and an excellent safety profile113 that was initially approved for the treatment of traveller’s diarrhoea but is increasingly used for the prevention of hepatic encephalopathy99.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > TARGETING MICROBIOTA TO PREVENT HCC > Antibiotics
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [113] Koo, H. L. & DuPont, H. L. Rifaximin: a unique gastrointestinal-selective antibiotic for enteric diseases. Curr. Opin. Gastroenterol. 26, 17–25 (2010). source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“A major problem with the use of norfloxacin is the development of antibiotic resistance110–112, suggesting that it might be suitable for treatment lasting weeks to months but not for long-term or life-long application in patients with cirrhosis.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > TARGETING MICROBIOTA TO PREVENT HCC > Antibiotics
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [110] Fernandez, J. et al. Bacterial infections in cirrhosis: epidemiological changes with invasive procedures and norfloxacin prophylaxis. Hepatology 35, 140–148 (2002). source
- Not checked yetcites [111] Fernandez, J. et al. Prevalence and risk factors of infections by multiresistant bacteria in cirrhosis: a prospective study. Hepatology 55, 1551–1561 (2012). source
- Not checked yetcites [112] Tandon, P., Delisle, A., Topal, J. E. & Garcia-Tsao, G. High prevalence of antibiotic-resistant bacterial infections among patients with cirrhosis at a US liver center. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 10, 1291–1298 (2012). source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Eritoran130 and resatorvid131 improved survival in animal models of sepsis, but did not reduce mortality in patients with severe sepsis132,133.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > TARGETING MICROBIOTA TO PREVENT HCC > TLR antagonists
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [130] Barochia, A., Solomon, S., Cui, X., Natanson, C. & Eichacker, P. Q. Eritoran tetrasodium (E5564) treatment for sepsis: review of preclinical and clinical studies. Expert Opin. Drug Metab. Toxicol. 7, 479–494 (2011). source
- Not checked yetcites [131] Naugler, W. E. et al. Gender disparity in liver cancer due to sex differences in MyD88-dependent IL-6 production. Science 317, 121–124 (2007). source
- Not checked yetcites [132] Opal, S. M. et al. Effect of eritoran, an antagonist of MD2-TLR4, on mortality in patients with severe sepsis: the ACCESS randomized trial. JAMA 309, 1154–1162 (2013). source
- Not checked yetcites [133] Rice, T. W. et al. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of TAK-242 for the treatment of severe sepsis. Crit. Care Med. 38, 1685–1694 (2010). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although TLR antagonists represent an exciting opportunity, long-term inhibition of TLR4 could result in immunosuppression, which might be deleterious due to the severely immunocompromised state of CLD patients.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > TARGETING MICROBIOTA TO PREVENT HCC > TLR antagonists
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In a rat model of DEN-induced hepatocarcinogenesis, administration of VSL#3 (containing Streptococcus thermophiles, Bifidobacterium breve, Bifidobacterium longum, Bifidobacterium infantis, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactobacillus paracasei, Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. Bulgaricus) mitigated enteric dysbiosis, ameliorated intestinal inflammation and decreased liver tum”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > TARGETING MICROBIOTA TO PREVENT HCC > Probiotics
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [77] Zhang, H. L. et al. Profound impact of gut homeostasis on chemically-induced pro-tumorigenic inflammation and hepatocarcinogenesis in rats. J. Hepatol. 57, 803–812 (2012). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The possible mechanisms of action include modulation of the host microbiota123, improvement of gut barrier function and modulation of the immune system.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > TARGETING MICROBIOTA TO PREVENT HCC > Probiotics
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [123] Arthur, J. C. et al. VSL#3 probiotic modifies mucosal microbial composition but does not reduce colitis-associated colorectal cancer. Sci. Rep. 3, 2868 (2013). source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Fxr-deficient mice exhibit compromised intestinal integrity, with further deterioration after bile duct ligation20, and a high incidence of HCC140.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > TARGETING MICROBIOTA TO PREVENT HCC > Targeting the gut barrier
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [20] Inagaki, T. et al. Regulation of antibacterial defense in the small intestine by the nuclear bile acid receptor. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 3920–3925 (2006). source
- Not checked yetcites [140] Kim, I. et al. Spontaneous hepatocarcinogenesis in farnesoid X receptor-null mice. Carcinogenesis 28, 940–946 (2007). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“However, one needs to keep in mind that patients receiving FMT for recurrent C. difficile infection have usually undergone multiple courses of antibiotic treatment, and present with a marked reduction of microbial diversity 18.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > TARGETING MICROBIOTA TO PREVENT HCC > FMT
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [18] van Nood, E. et al. Duodenal infusion of donor feces for recurrent Clostridium difficile. N. Engl. J. Med. 368, 407–415 (2013). source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“FXR is a receptor for bile acids that mediates their effects on the intestinal epithelial barrier as well as multiple effects on the liver, such as suppression of bile acid synthesis, inhibition of liver inflammation, promotion of liver regeneration and tumour suppression (reviewed elsewhere136).”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > TARGETING MICROBIOTA TO PREVENT HCC > Targeting the gut barrier
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [136] Schaap, F. G., Trauner, M. & Jansen, P. L. Bile acid receptors as targets for drug development. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 11, 55–67 (2014). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“OCA has a high safety profile in patients with NASH as demonstrated in the FLINT trial, with the major adverse effects being pruritus and alterations of serum lipid profiles144.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > TARGETING MICROBIOTA TO PREVENT HCC > Targeting the gut barrier
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [144] Neuschwander-Tetri, B. A. et al. Farnesoid X nuclear receptor ligand obeticholic acid for non-cirrhotic, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (FLINT): a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 385, 956–965 (2015). source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A double-blind trial showed that daily intake of VSL#3 reduced the risk of hospitalization for hepatic encephalopathy, as well as Child–Turcotte–Pugh and model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) scores, in patients with cirrhosis121.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > TARGETING MICROBIOTA TO PREVENT HCC > Probiotics
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [121] Dhiman, R. K. et al. Probiotic VSL#3 reduces liver disease severity and hospitalization in patients with cirrhosis: a randomized, controlled trial. Gastroenterology 147, 1327–1337.e3 (2014). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“FMT has successfully been used in patients with C. difficile infection, resulting in restoration of eubiosis and clinical improvements that were superior to standard antibiotic therapy18.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > TARGETING MICROBIOTA TO PREVENT HCC > FMT
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [18] van Nood, E. et al. Duodenal infusion of donor feces for recurrent Clostridium difficile. N. Engl. J. Med. 368, 407–415 (2013). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, OCA seems to be a promising candidate for HCC prevention therapies, and could be particularly effective by correcting multiple abnormalities in the gut–liver axis that promote the development of chronic inflammation and HCC in patients with cirrhosis.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > TARGETING MICROBIOTA TO PREVENT HCC > Targeting the gut barrier
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Malnutrition is common in patients with CLD and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality (reviewed elsewhere149).”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > TARGETING MICROBIOTA TO PREVENT HCC > Prokinetics
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [149] Kalaitzakis, E. Gastrointestinal dysfunction in liver cirrhosis. World J. Gastroenterol. 20, 14686–14695 (2014). source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Primary prevention most likely requires long-term, if not life-long treatment.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > CLINICAL TRANSLATION
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In this regard, rifaximin is probably the candidate with the best safety profile, and there is strong evidence that it positively affects additional complications of CLD such as hepatic encephalopathy, portal hypertension and liver fibrosis, and possibly even improves overall survival.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > CLINICAL TRANSLATION
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, translating these findings to patients might be difficult because of strong immunosuppressive effects of TNF inhibitors and increased rates of severe infection.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > TARGETING MICROBIOTA TO PREVENT HCC > Targeting the gut barrier
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The efficacy of targeting the gut–liver axis for secondary prevention could be tested in patients who have undergone curative HCC resection.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > CLINICAL TRANSLATION
hedgedconditional- Asserted: fails — The authors may not put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Primary prevention seems the most appealing approach, and could be tested prospectively in large cohorts of patients with liver cirrhosis and at high risk for HCC development.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > CLINICAL TRANSLATION
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Some alterations of the gut microbiota are probably disease-specific, and therefore some mechanisms by which the gut microbiota promotes the progression of liver disease and HCC could be — at least in part — disease-specific.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > CONCLUSIONS
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The prokinetic drug cisapride not only decreases intestinal transit time but also inhibits intestinal bacterial overgrowth and bacterial translocation, both in animal models150,151 and in patients with cirrhosis150,152.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > TARGETING MICROBIOTA TO PREVENT HCC > Prokinetics
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [150] Pardo, A. et al. Effect of cisapride on intestinal bacterial overgrowth and bacterial translocation in cirrhosis. Hepatology 31, 858–863 (2000). source
- Not checked yetcites [151] Zhang, S. C. et al. Effect of cisapride on intestinal bacterial and endotoxin translocation in cirrhosis. World J. Gastroenterol. 9, 534–538 (2003). source
- Not checked yetcites [152] Madrid, A. M., Hurtado, C., Venegas, M., Cumsille, F. & Defilippi, C. Long-term treatment with cisapride and antibiotics in liver cirrhosis: effect on small intestinal motility, bacterial overgrowth, and liver function. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 96, 1251–1255 (2001). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Of note, malnutrition increases intestinal permeability and facilitates bacterial translocation159.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > TARGETING MICROBIOTA TO PREVENT HCC > Prokinetics
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [159] De Santis, S., Cavalcanti, E., Mastronardi, M., Jirillo, E. & Chieppa, M. Nutritional keys for intestinal barrier modulation. Front. Immunol. 6, 612 (2015). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As discussed in the previous sections, good safety and beneficial effects on non-HCC complications of CLD are the most important selection criteria for the best-suited drug candidates.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > CLINICAL TRANSLATION
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The mechanisms by which the gut microbiota promotes the development of liver disease and HCC include dysbiosis — which results in altered bacterial metabolites such as the cancer-promoting secondary bile acid DCA — as well as a leaky gut, which promotes chronic hepatic inflammation via TLR-mediated signals.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > CONCLUSIONS
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Accordingly, nonselective β-adrenergic blockers decrease intestinal transit time and reduce intestinal bacterial overgrowth, intestinal permeability and bacterial translocation in experimental models of cirrhosis as well as in patients153–157.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > TARGETING MICROBIOTA TO PREVENT HCC > Prokinetics
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [153] Perez-Paramo, M. et al. Effect of propranolol on the factors promoting bacterial translocation in cirrhotic rats with ascites. Hepatology 31, 43–48 (2000). source
- Not checked yetcites [154] Madsen, B. S., Havelund, T. & Krag, A. Targeting the gut-liver axis in cirrhosis: antibiotics and non-selective beta-blockers. Adv. Ther. 30, 659–670 (2013). source
- Not checked yetcites [155] Mookerjee, R. P. et al. Treatment with non-selective beta blockers is associated with reduced severity of systemic inflammation and improved survival of patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure. J. Hepatol. 64, 574–582 (2016). source
- Not checked yetcites [156] Senzolo, M. et al. Oral propranolol decreases intestinal permeability in patients with cirrhosis: another protective mechanism against bleeding? Am. J. Gastroenterol. 104, 3115–3116 (2009). source
- Not checked yetcites [157] Senzolo, M. et al. β-blockers protect against spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in cirrhotic patients: a meta-analysis. Liver Int. 29, 1189–1193 (2009). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Current data from mouse models suggest that targeting the gut–liver axis has a potential role for the primary or secondary prevention of HCC, but not for the treatment of HCC (Table 2).”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > CLINICAL TRANSLATION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Table 2
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: No data currently support targeting the gut–microbiota–liver axis for HCC treatment.
The paper relies on this without support.
Hepatocellular carcinoma almost exclusively develops in patients with chronic liver disease and almost never occurs spontaneously without liver disease.
“HCC almost exclusively develops in patients with chronic liver disease”
“HCC is typically the result of chronic disease processes in the liver and almost never occurs spontaneously in the absence of liver disease.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Liver fibrosis is common to all types of advanced chronic liver disease.
“Liver fibrosis is part of the hepatic wound healing response and common to all types of advanced CLD.”
The paper relies on this without support.
TLR4 is expressed on multiple hepatic cell types, including Kupffer cells, hepatic stellate cells, endothelial cells and hepatocytes.
“TLR4 is present in multiple hepatic cell types, including Kupffer cells, hepatic stellate cells (HSCs), endothelial cells and hepatocytes.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The multi-layer intestinal barrier normally keeps hepatic exposure to pro-inflammatory microbe-associated molecular patterns minimal.
“The multi-layer intestinal barrier ensures that hepatic exposure to pro-inflammatory MAMPs is minimal.”
The paper relies on this without support.
No therapeutic options for HCC prevention exist other than treating the underlying liver disease.
“Currently, there are no therapeutic options for HCC prevention besides treating the underlying disease.”
The paper relies on this without support.
No clinical studies have tested targeting the gut–microbiota–liver axis for HCC prevention.
“With a complete lack of clinical studies testing this strategy, targeting the gut-microbiota–liver axis represents an exciting and understudied clinical opportunity”
The paper relies on this without support.
No data currently support targeting the gut–microbiota–liver axis for HCC treatment.
“Although there is accumulating evidence that the gut microbiota modulates responses to chemotherapy100,101 and immunomodulatory therapies102,103, there is currently no data supporting the concept of targeting the gut-microbiota–liver axis for the treatment of HCC.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The effects of norfloxacin on HCC development in patients with liver cirrhosis are unknown.
“the effects of norfloxacin on HCC development in patients with liver cirrhosis are not known.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The effects of rifaximin on HCC development remain unknown.
“Despite the large number of patients receiving rifaximin for the prevention of hepatic encephalopathy, the effects of rifaximin on HCC development remain unknown.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Clinically relevant resistance to rifaximin has not been reported.
“In contrast to norfloxacin, clinically relevant development of resistance to rifaximin has not been reported, suggesting that it is well-suited for long-term or even life-long treatment.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Probiotics have so far been investigated only in murine HCC models, and patient data are lacking.
“So far, probiotics have only been investigated in murine HCC models and data in patients are lacking (Table 1).”
The paper relies on this without support.
The effects of probiotics on endogenously arising tumours are unknown.
“However, the effects of probiotics on endogenously arising tumours are not known.”
The paper relies on this without support.
There are several clinical trials of probiotics in chronic liver disease patients but none in HCC patients.
“To date, there are several clinical trials on probiotics in patients with CLD but none in patients with HCC.”
The paper relies on this without support.
No data currently support the idea that FMT reduces or delays HCC development.
“However, there are currently no data supporting this premise and a number of hurdles have to be overcome.”
The paper relies on this without support.
None of the TLR4 antagonists have been tested in clinical trials in chronic liver disease or HCC patients.
“So far, none of these agents have been tested in clinical trials in patients with CLD or HCC.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Bile acids are an important regulator of the gut barrier.
“Bile acids are an important regulator of the gut barrier.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The long-term benefits of prokinetics such as cisapride in chronic liver disease patients have not been determined.
“However, the long-term benefits of prokinetics such as cisapride have yet to be determined in patients with CLD (Table 1).”
The paper relies on this without support.
Increased adrenergic activity is one purported mechanism for altered motility in cirrhosis.
“One of the purported mechanisms for altered motility in cirrhosis is increased adrenergic activity.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Current understanding of the gut microbiota's contribution is largely based on animal models and faecal microbiota samples from patients.
“Moreover, our current understanding of the contribution of the gut microbiota is largely based on animal models and faecal microbiota samples from patients.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Many key changes in the gut–liver axis occur in the small intestine and possibly within mucosa-adherent microbiota.
“As many of the key changes in the gut–liver axis occur in the small intestine and possibly also within mucosa-adherent microbiota, better analysis of the human microbiome at different anatomic sites is needed.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Many types of chronic liver disease that confer high HCC risk cannot be perfectly modeled in mice.
“Finally, many types of CLD that confer a high risk for HCC development cannot be perfectly modeled in mice.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, in the context of chronic liver diseases, there is a significant increase in portal and systemic LPS, owing to dysbiosis and increased gut permeability [61] (Fig. 2).”
From Gut microbiota-mediated immunomodulation in tumor (2021) · cites this paper as [61]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > TARGETING MICROBIOTA TO PREVENT HCC > Probiotics
“However, the effects of probiotics on endogenously arising tumours are not known.”
§ The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation > TARGETING MICROBIOTA TO PREVENT HCC > Probiotics
“decreased liver tumour growth and multiplicity77.”
Citations
Cites
An obesity-associated gut microbiome with increased capacity for energy harvest
Turnbaugh, P. J., Ley, R. E., Mahowald, M. A., Magrini, V., Mardis, E. R., & Gordon, J. I. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05414 · Cited by 12,444
Pattern Recognition Receptors and Inflammation
Takeuchi, O., & Akira, S. (2010) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2010.01.022 · Cited by 8,895
A core gut microbiome in obese and lean twins
Turnbaugh, P. J., Hamady, M., Yatsunenko, T., Cantarel, B. L., Duncan, A., Ley, R. E., Sogin, M. L., Jones, W. J., Roe, B. A., Affourtit, J. P., et al. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07540 · Cited by 7,823
Changes of Intestinal Functions in Liver Cirrhosis
Fukui, H., & Wiest, R. (2016) · Inflammatory Intestinal Diseases · doi:10.1159/000444436 · Cited by 6,820
Metabolic Endotoxemia Initiates Obesity and Insulin Resistance
Cani, P. D., Amar, J., Iglesias, M. A., Poggi, M., Knauf, C., Bastelica, D., Neyrinck, A. M., Fava, F., Tuohy, K. M., Chabo, C., et al. (2007) · Diabetes · doi:10.2337/db06-1491 · Cited by 6,638
The gut microbiota as an environmental factor that regulates fat storage
Bäckhed, F., Ding, H., Wang, T., Hooper, L. V., Koh, G. Y., Nagy, A., Semenkovich, C. F., & Gordon, J. I. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0407076101 · Cited by 6,245
Gut flora metabolism of phosphatidylcholine promotes cardiovascular disease
Wang, Z., Klipfell, E., Bennett, B. J., Koeth, R., Levison, B. S., DuGar, B., Feldstein, A. E., Britt, E. B., Fu, X., Chung, Y.-M., et al. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09922 · Cited by 5,597
Functional interactions between the gut microbiota and host metabolism
Tremaroli, V., & Bäckhed, F. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11552 · Cited by 4,387
Intestinal microbiota metabolism of l-carnitine, a nutrient in red meat, promotes atherosclerosis
Koeth, R. A., Wang, Z., Levison, B. S., Buffa, J. A., Org, E., Sheehy, B. T., Britt, E. B., Fu, X., Wu, Y., Li, L., et al. (2013) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.3145 · Cited by 4,386
Recognition of Commensal Microflora by Toll-Like Receptors Is Required for Intestinal Homeostasis
Rakoff-Nahoum, S., Paglino, J., Eslami-Varzaneh, F., Edberg, S., & Medzhitov, R. (2004) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2004.07.002 · Cited by 4,251
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pattern recognition receptors in health and diseases
Li, D., & Wu, M. (2021) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-021-00687-0 · Cited by 1,961
“The known mechanism is that NOD2 activates NF-κB, JAK2/STAT3, and MAPK pathways in a RIP2dependent manner, leading to liver inflammation.351 It is worth noting that activated NOD2 can also act as the initiator of the nuclear autophagy pathway that does not depend on RIP2, thereby promoting the degradation of the nucle…”
BackgroundInfluentialRen, Z., Li, A., Jiang, J., Zhou, L., Yu, Z., Lu, H., Xie, H., Chen, X., Shao, L., Zhang, R., et al. (2018) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2017-315084 · Cited by 782
Mechanisms of Fibrosis Development in Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis
Schwabe, R. F., Tabas, I., & Pajvani, U. B. (2020) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2019.11.311 · Cited by 671
Self-citationThe liver cancer immune microenvironment: Therapeutic implications for hepatocellular carcinoma
Donné, R., & Lujambio, A. (2022) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.32740 · Cited by 659
“The level of oncostatin M was found to positively correlate with metastasis in patients with HCC.[75] Myeloid‐derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) are a heterogeneous subset of myeloid cells that have been shown to inhibit T‐cell responses in cancer and HCC.”
BackgroundInfluentialContribution of the Intestinal Microbiome and Gut Barrier to Hepatic Disorders
Chopyk, D. M., & Grakoui, A. (2020) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2020.04.077 · Cited by 504
Metadata
- Authors
- Yu, L.-X., & Schwabe, R. F.
- Affiliations
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Schwabe, Robert F.
- Venue
- Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology
- Published
- 2017-07-05
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 527-539
- ISSN
- 1759-5045 (ISSN-L)
- 1759-5053
- PMC
- PMC6467288
- OpenAlex
- W2726093206
- Cited by
- 634
- References
- 161
- Citations by year
- 2026: 46 · 2025: 67 · 2024: 71 · 2023: 73 · 2022: 110 · 2021: 110 · 2020: 84 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 4.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (U01AA021912)
- National Cancer Institute (R01CA190844, R01CA200597)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver physiology and pathology
- Keywords
- gut microbiota, hepatocellular carcinoma, chronic liver disease, hepatocarcinogenesis, bacterial dysbiosis, leaky gut, microbe-associated molecular patterns, bacterial metabolites, liver inflammation, liver fibrosis, genotoxicity, microbiota-targeted therapy
- MeSH terms
- Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Carcinoma, Hepatocellular, Humans, Liver Neoplasms
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-07, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-07 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review