Cited by 2,401Memory and Neural MechanismsSpatial Cognition and NavigationMemory Processes and Influences

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 180 of the 180 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Human Hippocampus and Spatial and Episodic Memory

Open access

Abstract

Finding one's way around an environment and remembering the events that occur within it are crucial cognitive abilities that have been linked to the hippocampus and medial temporal lobes. Our review of neuropsychological, behavioral, and neuroimaging studies of human hippocampal involvement in spatial memory concentrates on three important concepts in this field: spatial frameworks, dimensionality, and orientation and self-motion. We also compare variation in hippocampal structure and function across and within species. We discuss how its spatial role relates to its accepted role in episodic memory. Five related studies use virtual reality to examine these two types of memory in ecologically valid situations. While processing of spatial scenes involves the parahippocampus, the right hippocampus appears particularly involved in memory for locations within an environment, with the left hippocampus more involved in context-dependent episodic or autobiographical memory.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00830-9

Cites

180 of 180 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 180 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Baddeley, A.D., and Lieberman, K. (1980). Spatial working memory. In Attention and Performance VIII. (Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates), pp. 521–539.
  2. Becker, 2001, A model of spatial recall, mental imagery and neglect, Neural Information Processing Systems, 13, 96
  3. Maguire, 2000, Patterns of hippocampal-cortical interaction dissociate temporal lobe memory subsystems, Hippocampus, 10, 475, 10.1002/1098-1063(2000)10:4<475::AID-HIPO14>3.0.CO;2-X · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Burgess, N., Maguire, E. A., & O'Keefe, J.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology (GB)
Corresponding author
Burgess, Neil
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-08
Volume
35
Issue
4
Pages
625-641
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1970006557
Cited by
2,401
References
180
Citations by year
2026: 79 · 2025: 113 · 2024: 134 · 2023: 113 · 2022: 121 · 2021: 141 · 2020: 138 · 2019: 138 · 2018: 152 · 2017: 135 · 2016: 144 · 2015: 113 · 2014: 119 · 2013: 95 · 2012: 81
FWCI
3.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuron (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
hippocampus, spatial memory, episodic memory, spatial framework, dimensionality, orientation, self-motion, parahippocampal cortex, right hippocampus, left hippocampus, autobiographical memory, virtual reality, medial temporal lobe
MeSH terms
Animals, Hippocampus, Humans, Functional Laterality, Memory, Memory Disorders, Motion Perception, Nerve Net, Orientation, Space Perception, User-Computer Interface, Maze Learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review