Cited by 1,679Cognitive Abilities and TestingDevelopmental and Educational NeuropsychologyCognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Generality of Working Memory Capacity: A Latent-Variable Approach to Verbal and Visuospatial Memory Span and Reasoning.

Open access

Abstract

A latent-variable study examined whether verbal and visuospatial working memory (WM) capacity measures reflect a primarily domain-general construct by testing 236 participants in 3 span tests each of verbal WM. visuospatial WM, verbal short-term memory (STM), and visuospatial STM. as well as in tests of verbal and spatial reasoning and general fluid intelligence (Gf). Confirmatory' factor analyses and structural equation models indicated that the WM tasks largely reflected a domain-general factor, whereas STM tasks, based on the same stimuli as the WM tasks, were much more domain specific. The WM construct was a strong predictor of Gf and a weaker predictor of domain-specific reasoning, and the reverse was true for the STM construct. The findings support a domain-general view of WM capacity, in which executive-attention processes drive the broad predictive utility of WM span measures, and domain-specific storage and rehearsal processes relate more strongly to domain-specific aspects of complex cognition.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0096-3445.133.2.189

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 17 references

Research works printed but not linked: 112

  1. 10.1037/0096-3445.131.4.567 · DOI
  2. Andrade, 2001, Working memory in perspective. Hove
  3. Atkinson, 1968, Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes., Vol. 2, 89
  4. 10.1037/0096-1523.24.3.780 · DOI
  5. 10.1037/0882-7974.5.3.421 · DOI
  6. Baddeley, 1986, Working memory.
  7. 2003, Barron 's profiles of American colleges
  8. Bennett, 1972, Differential Aptitude Test: Space Relations, Form 1.
  9. Berger, 1990, Air Force Officer Qualifying Test (AFOQT) Form P: Test manual (AFHRL-TR-89-56). Brooks Air Force Base
  10. 10.1016/0010-0285(90)90004-N · DOI
  11. 10.1016/S0005-7967(01)00127-9 · DOI
  12. 10.1037/h0060381 · DOI
  13. Brooks, 1968, Spatial and verbal components of the act of recall., Canadian Journal of Psychology, 22, 349, 10.1037/h0082775 · DOI
  14. Burke, 1958, Raven's Progressive Matrices: A review and critical evaluation., The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 93, 199, 10.1080/00221325.1958.10532420 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/0160-2896(91)90032-9 · DOI
  16. Carpenter, 1988, The role of working memory in language comprehension., 31
  17. 10.1146/annurev.ps.46.020195.000515 · DOI
  18. 10.1006/jecp.1999.2493 · DOI
  19. Cocchini, 2002, Concurrent performance of two memory tasks: Evidence for domain-specific working memory systems., Memory & Cognition, 30, 1086, 10.3758/BF03194326 · DOI
  20. Conway, 1996, Individual differences in working memory capacity: More evidence for a general capacity theory., Memory (Hove, England), 4, 577, 10.1080/741940997 · DOI
  21. Conway, 2001, Capacity, control and conflict: An individual differences perspective on attentional capture., 349, 10.1016/S0166-4115(01)80016-9 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.tics.2003.10.005 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.2307/1268249 · DOI
  24. 10.1037/0096-3445.132.1.113 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/S0022-5371(80)90312-6 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Daneman, 1983, Individual differences in integrating information between and within sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, &, Cognition, 9, 561
  27. 10.1016/0749-596X(86)90018-5 · DOI
  28. Daneman, 1996, Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis., Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 422, 10.3758/BF03214546 · DOI
  29. Daneman, 1987, Working memory and reading skill reexamined., 491
  30. De Jong, 2000, An intention-activation account of residual switch costs., 357
  31. De Jong, 2001, Adult age differences in goal activation and goal maintenance., The European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 13, 71, 10.1080/09541440042000223 · DOI
  32. De Renzi, 1975, Verbal and non-verbal short-term memory impairment following hemispheric damage., Cortex, 11, 341, 10.1016/S0010-9452(75)80026-8 · DOI
  33. Deary, 2000, Looking down on human intelligence: From psycho-metrics to the brain., 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198524175.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01623-5 · DOI
  35. Deary. 2002 · DOI
  36. 10.1016/S0160-2896(96)90008-2 · DOI
  37. Duncan, 1995, Attention, intelligence, and the frontal lobes., 721
  38. Ekstrom, 1976, Manual for kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests.
  39. 10.1037/0096-3445.128.3.309 · DOI · Paper page
  40. Feldman Barrett, Individual differences in working memory capacity and dual-process theories of mind., Psychological Bulletin
  41. 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2002.tb02524.x · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1016/0010-0277(94)00625-U · DOI
  43. 10.1037/0096-3445.129.1.61 · DOI
  44. 10.1037/h0042992 · DOI
  45. 10.1080/002075999399693 · DOI
  46. Guilford, 1967, The nature of human intelligence.
  47. Gustafsson, 1993, General and specific abilities as predictors of school achievement., Multivariate Behavioral Research, 28, 407, 10.1207/s15327906mbr2804_2 · DOI
  48. 10.1006/cogp.2001.0769 · DOI
  49. 10.1348/000712602761381376 · DOI
  50. 10.1080/09658210042000085 · DOI
  51. Henson. 2001 · DOI
  52. 10.1016/0749-596X(91)90025-F · DOI
  53. Jensen, 1998, The g factor: The science of mental ability.
  54. 10.1016/0160-2896(94)90029-9 · DOI
  55. Jones, 1995, Functional equivalence of verbal and spatial information in serial short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, &, Cognition, 21, 1008
  56. Jonides. Verbal and spatial working memory in humans. 35 43 1996 · DOI
  57. 10.1037/0033-295X.99.1.122 · DOI · Paper page
  58. Kahneman, 1973, Attention and effort.
  59. Kane, 2002, The role of prefrontal cortex in working memory capacity, executive attention, and general fluid intelligence: An individual-differences perspective., Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 637, 10.3758/BF03196323 · DOI · Paper page
  60. 10.1037/0096-3445.130.2.169 · DOI · Paper page
  61. Kellogg, 1999, Revised Beta Examination
  62. Kintsch, 1999, Models of working memory: Eight questions and some general issues., 412, 10.1017/CBO9781139174909.015 · DOI
  63. Klauer. 1997 · DOI
  64. Kline, 1998, Principles and practice of structural equation modeling.
  65. Kyllonen, 1993, Aptitude testing inspired by information processing: A test of the four-sources model., The Journal of General Psychology, 120, 375, 10.1080/00221309.1993.9711154 · DOI
  66. 10.1016/S0160-2896(05)80012-1 · DOI · Paper page
  67. 10.1016/1041-6080(95)90011-X · DOI
  68. 10.1016/S0160-2896(96)80005-5 · DOI
  69. Logie, 1995, Visuo-spatial working memory.
  70. 10.1016/0001-6918(90)90066-O · DOI · Paper page
  71. 10.1037/0096-3445.130.2.199 · DOI
  72. 10.1037/0033-295X.109.1.35 · DOI
  73. Mednick, 1967, Examiner's manual: Remote Associates Test.
  74. Miyake, 1999a, Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control., 10.1017/CBO9781139174909 · DOI
  75. Miyake, 1999b, Toward unified theories of working memory: Emerging general consensus, unresolved theoretical issues, and future research directions., 442, 10.1017/CBO9781139174909.016 · DOI
  76. 10.1037/0882-7974.8.3.389 · DOI
  77. Morris. 1987 · DOI
  78. 10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135131 · DOI
  79. 10.1037/0033-295X.86.3.214 · DOI
  80. Oberauer, (in press). The measurement of working memory capacity.
  81. 10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00251-2 · DOI
  82. 10.1016/S0160-2896(02)00115-0 · DOI
  83. 10.1037/0882-7974.17.2.299 · DOI
  84. Posile, 2000, Evaluating models of the topographical organization of working memory function in frontal cortex with event-related fMRI., Psychobiology, 28, 132, 10.3758/BF03331973 · DOI
  85. 1999, Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence.
  86. Quinn. 1994 · DOI
  87. Raven, 1998, Progressive matrices.
  88. Richardson, 1996, Working memory and human cognition., 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195100990.001.0001 · DOI
  89. 10.1006/jmva.1993.1063 · DOI
  90. 10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00132-X · DOI
  91. Salthouse. 1995 · DOI
  92. Salthouse, 2001, A research strategy for investigating group differences in a cognitive construct: Application to ageing and executive processes., The European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 13, 29, 10.1080/09541440126131 · DOI
  93. 10.1037/0882-7974.4.1.18 · DOI
  94. 10.1037/0882-7974.6.1.118 · DOI
  95. Salthouse, 1989, Effects of adult age and working memory on reasoning and spatial abilities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, &, Cognition, 15, 507
  96. Schneider, 2002, E-Prime user's guide.
  97. 10.1037/0096-3445.125.1.4 · DOI
  98. 10.2190/VQJD-T1YD-5WVB-RYPJ · DOI
  99. Sohn, 2003, Rales of working memory capacity and long-term working memory skill in complex task performance., Memory & Cognition, 31, 458, 10.3758/BF03194403 · DOI
  100. Spearman, 1927, The abilities of man: Their nature and measurement.
  101. Stankov, 2002, A diminutive general., 19
  102. 10.1016/S0160-2896(01)00100-3 · DOI
  103. Swanson, 1996, Individual and age-related differences in children's working memory., Memory & Cognition, 24, 70, 10.3758/BF03197273 · DOI
  104. 10.1037/0022-0663.93.4.720 · DOI
  105. Swanson, 2001, A subgroup analysis of working memory in children with reading disabilities: Domain-general or domain-specific deficiency?, Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 249, 10.1177/002221940103400305 · DOI
  106. Thurstone, 1938, Primary mental abilities.
  107. Toth, 1999, Not one versus many, but zero versus any: Structure and function in the context of the multiple memory systems debate., 233, 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198524069.003.0009 · DOI
  108. 10.1037/0003-066X.40.4.385 · DOI · Paper page
  109. 10.1016/0749-596X(89)90040-5 · DOI · Paper page
  110. 10.1016/S0022-5371(84)90104-X · DOI
  111. Wickens, 1980, The structure of processing resources., 239
  112. Wilson, 2001, Are mathematics disabilities due to a domain-general or a domain-specific working memory deficit?, Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 237, 10.1177/002221940103400304 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kane, M. J., Hambrick, D. Z., Tuholski, S. W., Wilhelm, O., Payne, T. W., & Engle, R. W.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Greensboro (US)
  • Michigan State University (US)
  • Southern Illinois University Edwardsville (US)
  • Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
Published
2004-06
Volume
133
Issue
2
Pages
189-217
ISSN
  • 0096-3445 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2222
OpenAlex
W2048613949
Cited by
1,679
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 37 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 59 · 2023: 64 · 2022: 65 · 2021: 101 · 2020: 83 · 2019: 115 · 2018: 79 · 2017: 103 · 2016: 107 · 2015: 91 · 2014: 95 · 2013: 106 · 2012: 93
FWCI
61.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology General (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • NC Digital Online Collection of Knowledge and Scholarship (The University of North Carolina at Greensboro) (submittedVersion)
  • Digital Kenyon (Kenyon College) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
Keywords
working memory capacity, domain generality, verbal working memory, visuospatial working memory, short-term memory, memory span, fluid intelligence, spatial reasoning, verbal reasoning, executive attention
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Decision Making, Female, Generalization, Psychological, Humans, Male, Memory, Space Perception, Visual Perception, Vocabulary

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review