Cited by 1,445Cancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersImmunotherapy and Immune ResponsesT-cell and B-cell Immunology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 350 of the 350 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 9 of the 376 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

Combination strategies with PD-1/PD-L1 blockade: current advances and future directions

Open access

Abstract

Antibodies targeting programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) or its ligand PD-L1 rescue T cells from exhausted status and revive immune response against cancer cells. Based on the immense success in clinical trials, ten α-PD-1 (nivolumab, pembrolizumab, cemiplimab, sintilimab, camrelizumab, toripalimab, tislelizumab, zimberelimab, prolgolimab, and dostarlimab) and three α-PD-L1 antibodies (atezolizumab, durvalumab, and avelumab) have been approved for various types of cancers. Nevertheless, the low response rate of α-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy remains to be resolved. For most cancer patients, PD-1/PD-L1 pathway is not the sole speed-limiting factor of antitumor immunity, and it is insufficient to motivate effective antitumor immune response by blocking PD-1/PD-L1 axis. It has been validated that some combination therapies, including α-PD-1/PD-L1 plus chemotherapy, radiotherapy, angiogenesis inhibitors, targeted therapy, other immune checkpoint inhibitors, agonists of the co-stimulatory molecule, stimulator of interferon genes agonists, fecal microbiota transplantation, epigenetic modulators, or metabolic modulators, have superior antitumor efficacies and higher response rates. Moreover, bifunctional or bispecific antibodies containing α-PD-1/PD-L1 moiety also elicited more potent antitumor activity. These combination strategies simultaneously boost multiple processes in cancer-immunity cycle, remove immunosuppressive brakes, and orchestrate an immunosupportive tumor microenvironment. In this review, we summarized the synergistic antitumor efficacies and mechanisms of α-PD-1/PD-L1 in combination with other therapies. Moreover, we focused on the advances of α-PD-1/PD-L1-based immunomodulatory strategies in clinical studies. Given the heterogeneity across patients and cancer types, individualized combination selection could improve the effects of α-PD-1/PD-L1-based immunomodulatory strategies and relieve treatment resistance.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This review summarizes mechanisms and clinical advances of combining PD-1/PD-L1 blockade with chemotherapy, radiotherapy, angiogenesis inhibitors, other immune checkpoints, targeted therapy, STING agonists, bispecific antibodies, FMT, epigenetic/metabolic modulators, cytokines, and CAR-T cells. It argues that combination strategies can boost multiple steps of the cancer-immunity cycle and improve response, but individualized selection and better predictive biomarkers are needed.

Key findings

  • Ten α-PD-1 antibodies (nivolumab, pembrolizumab, cemiplimab, sintilimab, camrelizumab, toripalimab, tislelizumab, zimberelimab, prolgolimab, dostarlimab) and three α-PD-L1 antibodies (atezolizumab, durvalumab, avelumab) have been approved for various cancers, yet low response rates remain a major problem.
  • Several combinations improve outcomes in trials: relatlimab plus nivolumab showed PFS 10.1 vs. 4.6 months (HR 0.75) in advanced melanoma; tiragolumab plus atezolizumab improved ORR (OR 2.57, 95% CI 1.07–6.14) and PFS (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.37–0.90) in PD-L1-positive NSCLC; niraparib plus pembrolizumab had ORR 56.3% in PD-L1-high advanced NSCLC.
  • Toxicity can limit combinations: TATTON reported 22% interstitial lung disease with osimertinib plus durvalumab, and CheckMate-370 reported 38% severe hepatic toxicities with nivolumab plus crizotinib.
  • Only combinations of α-PD-1/PD-L1 with chemotherapy, angiogenesis inhibitors, or α-CTLA-4 are approved by the FDA or NMPA; most other combinations remain preclinical or in clinical trials.

Methods

  • Narrative review of published preclinical and clinical literature on α-PD-1/PD-L1-based combination strategies.
  • Synthesizes mechanisms, approved indications, and clinical trial results across many cancer types, with tables listing selected trials and bispecific/bifunctional antibodies.
  • No primary patient data, systematic search strategy, or meta-analysis is reported.

Limitations

  • The paper states that many positive preclinical findings have not been validated clinically, that optimal preclinical models are a challenge, and that only a few combinations are approved.
  • It states that combination therapy increases irAE risk and healthcare cost, and that optimal dosage, timing, sequence, and predictive biomarkers remain unclear.
  • Evident from the text: this is a narrative review without a described systematic search or quantitative synthesis, so selection and interpretation of cited trials may be subject to bias.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12943-021-01489-2

Cites

350 of 350 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Figures

Fig. 1 The synergistic antitumor efficacies and mechanisms of α-PD-1/PD-L1 in combination with chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or angiogenesis inhibitor. a Chemotherapy synergizes with α-PD-1/PD-L1. Some cytotoxic chemotherapeutic drugs could induce immunogenic cell death and stimulate antitumor immune response. Immunogenic cell death is featured with some upregulated damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) such as calreticulin (CRT), ATP, and high-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1). The ATP-P2RX7, CRT-CD91, and HMGB1-TLR4 pathways facilitate the antigen capture and presentation of DC, ultimately motivating adaptive antitumor immune response. Apart from immunogenic cell death, low-dose chemotherapy depletes regulatory T cells (Tregs) and promotes the repolarization of tumor-associated macrophage (TAM) from M2-like to M1-like phenotype. b Radiotherapy synergizes with α-PD-1/PD-L1. Firstly, radiotherapy could induce immunogenic cell death, enhance antitumor immune response, promote T cell infiltration, expand T-cell receptor (TCR) repertoire in the TME. Secondly, radiotherapy upregulates the expression of PD-L1 on tumor cells, which might be utilized by additional α-PD-1/PD-L1. Thirdly, radiotherapy increases the MHC-I on tumor cells and relieves resistance to α-PD-1/PD-L1. c Angiogenesis inhibitor synergizes with α-PD-1/PD-L1. Angiogenesis inhibitor blocks proangiogenic pathways, promotes vessel normalization, improves tumor perfusion and oxygenation, restores the hypoxic TME, and enhances drug delivery. Also, angiogenesis inhibitor reshapes the TME: promoting T cell infiltration and DC maturation, enhancing the differentiation towards M1-like macrophage, decreasing the ratio of Treg and MDSC, and alleviating hypoxia-induced PD-L1
Fig. 1 The synergistic antitumor efficacies and mechanisms of α-PD-1/PD-L1 in combination with chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or angiogenesis inhibitor. a Chemotherapy synergizes with α-PD-1/PD-L1. Some cytotoxic chemotherapeutic drugs could induce immunogenic cell death and stimulate antitumor immune response. Immunogenic cell death is featured with some upregulated damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) such as calreticulin (CRT), ATP, and high-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1). The ATP-P2RX7, CRT-CD91, and HMGB1-TLR4 pathways facilitate the antigen capture and presentation of DC, ultimately motivating adaptive antitumor immune response. Apart from immunogenic cell death, low-dose chemotherapy depletes regulatory T cells (Tregs) and promotes the repolarization of tumor-associated macrophage (TAM) from M2-like to M1-like phenotype. b Radiotherapy synergizes with α-PD-1/PD-L1. Firstly, radiotherapy could induce immunogenic cell death, enhance antitumor immune response, promote T cell infiltration, expand T-cell receptor (TCR) repertoire in the TME. Secondly, radiotherapy upregulates the expression of PD-L1 on tumor cells, which might be utilized by additional α-PD-1/PD-L1. Thirdly, radiotherapy increases the MHC-I on tumor cells and relieves resistance to α-PD-1/PD-L1. c Angiogenesis inhibitor synergizes with α-PD-1/PD-L1. Angiogenesis inhibitor blocks proangiogenic pathways, promotes vessel normalization, improves tumor perfusion and oxygenation, restores the hypoxic TME, and enhances drug delivery. Also, angiogenesis inhibitor reshapes the TME: promoting T cell infiltration and DC maturation, enhancing the differentiation towards M1-like macrophage, decreasing the ratio of Treg and MDSC, and alleviating hypoxia-induced PD-L1CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 2 The synergistic antitumor efficacies and mechanisms of α-PD-1/PD-L1 in combination with other novel therapies. a The co-inhibitory and co-stimulatory pathways regulating the activities of T cells or NK cells. The green circle refers to co-stimulatory pathway, and the red circle refers to co-inhibitory pathway. b Targeted therapy synergizes with α-PD-1/PD-L1. Oncogenic pathways such as MAPK and PI3K-AKT promote PD-L1 transcription. Targeted therapies including EGFR-TKI, ALK-TKI, and RAS inhibitor not only directly retard tumor growth, but also decrease intrinsic PD-L1 expression. Moreover, STING agonist enhances DC function by activating STING-IFN-I pathway. c The bifunctional and bispecific antibody containing α-PD-L1 moiety. The structures of M7824 and YM101. d The effect of gut microbiota on antitumor immunity. Gut microbiota regulates DC function, Th1-skweing immunity, Th17 polarization, Treg differentiation, and cytokines secretion. Altered gut mucosa immunity could influence the effect of systemic anticancer immunotherapy. Abbreviations: EGFR-TKI, epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor; ALK, anaplastic lymphoma kinase; PARP, Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase; DSB, double-strand break; STING, stimulator of interferon genes
Fig. 2 The synergistic antitumor efficacies and mechanisms of α-PD-1/PD-L1 in combination with other novel therapies. a The co-inhibitory and co-stimulatory pathways regulating the activities of T cells or NK cells. The green circle refers to co-stimulatory pathway, and the red circle refers to co-inhibitory pathway. b Targeted therapy synergizes with α-PD-1/PD-L1. Oncogenic pathways such as MAPK and PI3K-AKT promote PD-L1 transcription. Targeted therapies including EGFR-TKI, ALK-TKI, and RAS inhibitor not only directly retard tumor growth, but also decrease intrinsic PD-L1 expression. Moreover, STING agonist enhances DC function by activating STING-IFN-I pathway. c The bifunctional and bispecific antibody containing α-PD-L1 moiety. The structures of M7824 and YM101. d The effect of gut microbiota on antitumor immunity. Gut microbiota regulates DC function, Th1-skweing immunity, Th17 polarization, Treg differentiation, and cytokines secretion. Altered gut mucosa immunity could influence the effect of systemic anticancer immunotherapy. Abbreviations: EGFR-TKI, epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor; ALK, anaplastic lymphoma kinase; PARP, Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase; DSB, double-strand break; STING, stimulator of interferon genesCC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 3 Therapies regulating the cancer-immunity cycle. The cancer-immunity cycle starts with cancer antigen release and ends with cancer cell-killing by immune cells. Each step in the cycle is regulated by various factors. The stimulatory factors (shown in green) enhance antitumor immunity, while the inhibitory factors (shown in red) undermine antitumor immunity. These factors provide potential therapeutic targets to promote antitumor immunity. The figure presents some of therapies regulating the cancer-immunity cycle. Abbreviations: CAF, cancer-associated fibroblasts; PARP, Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase; DSB, double-strand break; STING, stimulator of interferon genes; A2AR, adenosine 2A receptor
Fig. 3 Therapies regulating the cancer-immunity cycle. The cancer-immunity cycle starts with cancer antigen release and ends with cancer cell-killing by immune cells. Each step in the cycle is regulated by various factors. The stimulatory factors (shown in green) enhance antitumor immunity, while the inhibitory factors (shown in red) undermine antitumor immunity. These factors provide potential therapeutic targets to promote antitumor immunity. The figure presents some of therapies regulating the cancer-immunity cycle. Abbreviations: CAF, cancer-associated fibroblasts; PARP, Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase; DSB, double-strand break; STING, stimulator of interferon genes; A2AR, adenosine 2A receptorCC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

215 Not checked yet · 26 Own interpretation · 6 No basis given · 2 Partly supported · accuracy not yet measured

Verify all 367 references — free account
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 72
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 22
91 of 91
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Resistance to α-PD-1/PD-L1 is related to the upregulation of other immune checkpoints.

    “The resistance to α-PD-1/PD-L1 is related to the upregulation of other immune checkpoints.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    At present, only combinations of α-PD-1/PD-L1 with chemotherapy, angiogenesis inhibitor, or α-CTLA-4 are approved by the FDA or NMPA.

    “At present, only combinations of α-PD-1/PD-L1 with chemotherapy, angiogenesis inhibitor, or α-CTLA-4 are approved by the FDA or NMPA.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Combination therapy increases the risk of irAEs and the cost of health care.

    “Besides, combination therapy increases the risk of irAEs and the cost of health care.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Cyclic dinucleotides have two main flaws: poor transmembrane capability and dependence on intratumor injection.

    “Generally, CDNs have two main flaws: poor transmembrane capability and depending on intratumor injection.”
4 of 4

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 350 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 1,445

Metadata

Authors
Yi, M., Zheng, X., Niu, M., Zhu, S., Ge, H., & Wu, K.
Affiliations
  • Tongji Hospital (CN)
  • Zhengzhou University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Ge, Hong
  • Wu, Kongming
Venue
Molecular Cancer
Published
2022-01-21
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
28-28
ISSN
1476-4598 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4205454439
Cited by
1,445
References
350
Citations by year
2026: 224 · 2025: 417 · 2024: 430 · 2023: 266 · 2022: 107
FWCI
37.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Cancer (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (81874120, 82073370)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
Keywords
PD-1/PD-L1 blockade, immune checkpoint inhibitors, combination cancer therapy, nivolumab, pembrolizumab, durvalumab, avelumab, bispecific antibodies, cancer immunotherapy, tumor microenvironment, cancer-immunity cycle, treatment resistance
MeSH terms
Clinical Studies as Topic, Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Combined Modality Therapy, Disease Susceptibility, Humans, Neoplasms, Prognosis, Biomarkers, Tumor, Treatment Outcome, Disease Management, Molecular Targeted Therapy, B7-H1 Antigen, Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review