The DOI matches its Crossref record; 269 of the 269 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 19 of the 259 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
A critical review of interfaces with the peripheral nervous system for the control of neuroprostheses and hybrid bionic systems
Open accessAbstract
Considerable scientific and technological efforts have been devoted to develop neuroprostheses and hybrid bionic systems that link the human nervous system with electronic or robotic prostheses, with the main aim of restoring motor and sensory functions in disabled patients.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This review surveys peripheral nervous system interfaces for neuroprostheses and hybrid bionic systems, comparing non-invasive, muscle, extraneural, intraneural, and regenerative electrodes. It concludes that no single interface is universally optimal; selection depends on required selectivity, invasiveness, clinical maturity, and application.
Key findings
- Electrode invasiveness generally tracks selectivity: surface and muscle electrodes are safer and easier but act only on underlying or implanted muscles; cuff and epineurial electrodes interface many axons; intrafascicular, penetrating, and sieve/regenerative electrodes access smaller axon groups but carry greater risk of nerve damage and are mostly research-stage.
- Clinical PNS neuroprostheses are dominated by stimulation: sacral anterior root stimulators for bladder control reached about 2,000 patients worldwide; phrenic pacing, vagus nerve stimulation (postoperative infection under 3%, device removal 1%), cochlear implants, and pain/continence devices are clinical, while recording interfaces for prosthesis control remain largely research.
- Penetrating arrays: Utah MEAs with 25 or 100 needles, including slanted lengths from 0.5 to 1.5 mm, recorded single-unit mechanoreceptor responses in only 10–20% of electrodes and evoked graded muscle recruitment with 1–20 µA currents; responses were stable over 36 hours, and in cat sciatic nerve up to 7 months stimulation stabilized in 80% of electrodes but sensory recordings did not.
- LIFEs implanted in eight amputees for two days allowed voluntary motor signals linked to intended missing-limb movements and elicited graded touch, joint-movement, and position sensations; regenerative sieve electrodes require hole diameters around 40–65 µm, and no human implants have been reported. EMG-based control works for prostheses and exoskeletons but is limited in degrees of freedom, while ENG can provide event and kinematic feedback.
Methods
- Design: critical narrative review, not a primary experimental study; it covers PNS organization, electrode types, materials and fabrication, and control strategies.
- Data or sample: synthesizes prior animal and human studies and clinical experience; no systematic search, inclusion criteria, or primary dataset is described.
- Main analysis: qualitative comparison using tables of advantages/disadvantages and application/status, with discussion of engineering, biological, and clinical tradeoffs.
Limitations
- Stated: no universal best electrode exists; nerve electrodes may damage nerves; cuff, intraneural, and regenerative designs need more study; regenerative electrodes have no human implants; bioelectronic interfaces are early experimental.
- Stated: long-term stability, selectivity, and biocompatibility remain unresolved, and many recording approaches are not clinically mature.
- Evident: as a narrative review from 2005, it lacks a systematic search or meta-analysis and predates later technological and clinical developments.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
19 of 259 cited sources checked · 8 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Helical electrodes are widely used for FES of the vagus nerve, which has found therapeutical applications for the control of intractable epilepsy, sleep apnea, and treatment of depressive syndromes (McLachlan, 1997; Fisher and Handforth, 1999) .”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites McLachlan, 1997 source
- Partly supportedcites Fisher and Handforth, 1999 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Abstract (page unavailable) describes an electrode implanted around the left vagus nerve and concludes that vagus nerve stimulation is effective for medically intractable partial seizures. It does not identify the electrode as helical, establish that helical electrodes are widely used, or discuss treatment of sleep apnea or depressive syndromes. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesEvery source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Besides the intradural surgical implantation, an epidural implantation procedure was developed (Sauerwein et al., 1990) to enhance the group of patients who may benefit from this kind of neural prosthesis.”
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Sauerwein et al., 1990 source
The paper describes an extradural implantation technique and says it was first used for a patient unsuitable for the standard intrathecal operation (opening section). The Results recommend it for patients who could benefit from a sacral anterior root stimulator but for whom intrathecal surgery would be risky, supporting the claim that the alternative procedure extends eligibility. (LLM, conf=0.91)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“The SARS can be also used to restore male sexual and reproductive function (Stief et al., 1992; Brindley, 1995) .”
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Stief et al., 1992 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Abstract (p. 5) says the implanted stimulator could induce penile erection, and the Discussion (p. 6) reports full erections in all three men at certain stimulation frequencies. This supports restoration of an aspect of sexual function, but the paper does not establish restoration of reproductive function, such as ejaculation or fertility. (LLM, conf=0.88)
- Not matchedcites Brindley, 1995
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Although involving a more invasive insertion procedure, electrode arrays provided neural contacts with low-force recruitment properties similar to those of single wires.”
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Smit et al., 1999 source
The Abstract states that array-electrode low-force slopes and threshold currents did not differ significantly from those of randomly inserted single wire-microelectrodes. It explicitly concludes that the arrays provided similar low-force recruitment properties despite a more invasive insertion procedure. (LLM, conf=0.95)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes- Supported
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“Especially for intrafascicular electrodes, no strict inverse recruitment was observed (Veltink et al., 1989) .”
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites Veltink et al., 1989 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The supplied passages contain bibliographic metadata, not findings about recruitment. Searches for inverse recruitment with intrafascicular electrodes and for recruitment-order reversal returned no relevant passage, so our copy does not establish whether the paper observed strict inverse recruitment. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes- Could not verify
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“The arrays were capable of evoking threshold forces selectively with high efficiency.”
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Smit et al., 1999 source
The Abstract states that the eight arrays selectively evoked threshold forces with an average efficiency of 0.81 (81%), supporting the description of high efficiency. (LLM, conf=0.95)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Array results revealed partial blocking of neural conduction, similar to that reported with microneurographic insertion with single needles.”
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Smit et al., 1999 source
The Abstract states the claim directly. The section “C. Blocking of Action Potentials” also reports reduced force with stimulation proximal to the array insertion site, indicating partial conduction block, and compares this with findings from single wire-microelectrode insertion. (LLM, conf=0.95)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes- Supported
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“Motor recruitment was found more stable with stimulation by intrafascicular multielectrodes than by extraneural electrodes.”
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites Veltink et al., 1989 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The available copy contains a title and bibliographic records (the passage labeled Abstract, no page given), but no study findings. Searches for stable motor recruitment and for a comparison of intrafascicular with extraneural stimulation found no relevant passage, so the claimed difference cannot be verified from this copy. (LLM, conf=0.73)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes- Could not verify
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“the extraction of information from natural sensors in the body by processing afferent nerve signals is very challenging (Johnson et al., 1995)”
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Johnson et al., 1995 source
The Background and Rationale section says that using information from natural sensors requires techniques for long-term nerve recording, separating wanted from unwanted information, and relating neural activity to the variables needed for control. The Discussion further describes separating useful signals from noise in whole-nerve recordings and says most processing methods are currently ad hoc. Together, these passages support the characterization of extraction as challenging. (LLM, conf=0.92)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes- Supported
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“Several features can be extracted in both time and frequency domains (Zardoshti-Kermani et al., 1995; Englehart, 1998; Pattichis and Pattichis, 1999; Sparto et al., 2000) that increase the possibility of controlling more than two degrees of freedom of the prosthesis when used in combination with advanced classification algorithms (Kelly et al., 1990; Christodoulou and Pattichis, 1999; Micera et al”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Zardoshti-Kermani et al., 1995 source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Englehart, 1998
- Supportedcites Pattichis and Pattichis, 1999 source
The citation to Pattichis and Pattichis is attached to the statement that features can be extracted in both time and frequency domains, not to the later prosthesis-control claim. Section D (Table IV) lists time-domain and frequency-domain parameters extracted from motor unit action potentials. (LLM, conf=0.93)
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes
- It may state two separate claims as one. 94
- Probably not a substantial claim. 46
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Nowadays, the most frequent use of PNS interfaces resides in FES, which has clinical applications in various systems designed to control micturition and defecation by stimulating the sacral roots”
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Brindley et al., 1986 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion reports that most patients used sacral anterior root stimulators mainly for micturition. Methods and Results also reports that a few used S3 or S4 stimulation to aid defaecation. The paper does not establish that FES is the most frequent use of PNS interfaces overall. (LLM, conf=0.87)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Creasey, 1993 source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Van Kerrebroeck et al., 1993 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Acoustic signals increase in parallel with surface EMG signals during voluntary and evoked contraction, but acoustic amplitude decays with fatigue whereas EMG amplitude does not”
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Barry et al., 1985 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Abstract reports that acoustic amplitude decayed with fatigue while surface EMG amplitude did not, and the Figure 5 discussion describes both signals increasing together when voluntary effort increased. The copy does not establish that they increase in parallel during evoked contractions; the Discussion describes external nerve stimulation as a proposed future test. It also notes that surface EMG began to decay below 45% of maximal voluntary contraction, so the claim that EMG amplitude does not decay needs qualification. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)
- Partly supportedcites Barry et al., 1992 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results (page unavailable) report that vibration amplitude declines with fatigue, but also state that the evoked compound muscle action potential (CMAP) declines, though less rapidly. The discussion (page unavailable) says surface EMG amplitude typically does not decline during moderate voluntary contractions. The paper does not support the broader claim that acoustic and EMG signals increase in parallel during both types of contraction, or that electrical-signal amplitude does not decline with evoked fatigue. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“After more than 10 years of development, Brindley's group reported the first 50 cases of a radio frequency-controlled implant from series production with medical approval called sacral anterior root stimulator (SARS) in humans (Brindley et al., 1986) .”
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Brindley et al., 1986 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Abstract reports the first 50 human recipients of sacral anterior root stimulators; Methods and Results describes external radio transmitters, and the References include development work dating to 1972. But the printed sentence goes further: Methods and Results says the first 11 implants were made in the Neurological Prostheses Unit, not series-produced, and our copy does not establish medical approval. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 50Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“The implant was commercialized as FinetechBrindley stimulator, and less than a decade later 500 patients benefited from the system (Brindley, 1994) .”
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Brindley, 1994 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction says the 500th London-design stimulator was implanted in February 1992, and Sources of information identifies Finetech Medical Ltd as the manufacturer. The paper does not date commercialization, so it cannot establish the claimed interval of less than a decade. Its benefits discussion describes potential benefits but does not establish that all 500 patients benefited. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“In acute experiments, multiple-wire-microelectrode arrays were inserted into rat nerves to investigate selective stimulation of motor units (Smit et al., 1999) .”
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Smit et al., 1999 source
The Abstract states that, in acute experiments, eight wire-microelectrode arrays were inserted into the rat common peroneal nerve to investigate selective stimulation of motor units in the extensor digitorum longus muscle. This directly supports the citing sentence. (LLM, conf=0.95)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“The histology of animal nerves that had metal or polymer LIFEs implanted for a period of 6 months revealed that the implants are biocompatible and that no damage was caused by the presence of the electrode, although a slight increase in connective tissue surrounding the implant site was evident in the longterm (Lefurge et al., 1991; Lawrence et al., 2002) .”
What the sources say
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“The activity of embryonic spinal cord cells of mice has been recorded simultaneously over a period of several months on a planar glass substrate with 64 iridium tin oxide electrodes (Droge et al., 1986)”
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Droge et al., 1986 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Cell culture section describes recordings from embryonic mouse spinal-cord cells, and the paper describes simultaneous multisite recording. But its recording matrix had 36 gold-conductor electrodes, not 64 iridium tin oxide electrodes; the Results describe cultures examined 3–5 weeks after seeding, not recordings over several months. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Different complex algorithms have been developed to extract force/torque information from sEMG signals that address these limitations, although in some cases good results have been achieved using a simple proportional control law (Gordon and Ferris, 2004)”
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Gordon and Ferris, 2004 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Virtual object interface section describes a simple proportional law: processed surface EMG amplitudes generated virtual forces, and the Discussion reports that subjects improved their control with practice. The Discussion also mentions signal-processing algorithms for myoelectric prostheses, but our copy does not say those algorithms extract force or torque from sEMG; the study's proportional forces were virtual, not measured force or torque estimates. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
In the paper
“The patients learned to open and close the hand reliably after a few minutes of practice”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Barry et al., 1986
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Attempts to develop material surfaces that may be recognized as biological and form truly biocompatible interfaces with the tissue are under investigation, although they have yet to be integrated in functional neural interfaces.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Extraneural electrodes, such as cuff and epineurial electrodes, provide simultaneous interface with many axons in the nerve”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, nerve electrodes also have the potential to damage the nerves on which they are implanted, whereas muscle electrodes are generally considered as safer”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Signals are transmitted by the corresponding axons in series of impulses or action potentials, with intensity of the signal mainly coded in impulse frequency along the peripheral axon.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Signals are transmitted by axons in series of impulses or action potentials, with intensity mainly coded in impulse frequency along the peripheral axon.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Patients are able to use the system for activities of daily living and enhancing their quality of life and independency.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Nerve fibers, both afferent and efferent, are grouped in fascicles surrounded by connective tissue in the peripheral nerve”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Peters et al., 1991
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“New technological developments are taking into account the fact that the most patients with nervous system injury suffer from an incomplete lesion, and thus modular, controllable systems for supporting these functions are being developed”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Rupp and Gerner, 2004 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Recruitment of motor units follows an order of size, with slow fatigue-resistant motor units activated first and large fast-fatigue motor units activated only at high levels of tension.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Recruitment of motor units follows an order of size, with slow fatigue-resistant motor units activated first and large fast-fatigue motor units activated only at high levels of tension.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The fascicular architecture changes throughout the length of the nerve, with an increasing number of fascicles of smaller size in distal with respect to proximal segments.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Rests on an assumption: The fascicular architecture changes throughout the length of the nerve, with an increasing number of fascicles of smaller size in distal compared with proximal segments.
In the paper
“Due to the proximity to the nerve, the stimulus intensity required for activation is reduced in comparison with muscular or surface electrodes and, consequently, hazardous electrochemical processes and power consumption of the stimulator system can be decreased”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Loeb and Peck, 1996 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The perineurium is the main contributor to the tensile strength of the nerve, acts as a diffusion barrier, and maintains the endoneurial fluid pressure.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The perineurium is the main contributor to the tensile strength of the nerve, acts as a diffusion barrier, and maintains the endoneurial fluid pressure.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“intrafascicular, penetrating, and regenerative electrodes may contact small groups of axons within a nerve fascicle”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“In general, the compatibility between a technical and a biological system (Bronzino, 1995) can be divided into the structural biocompatibility and the surface biocompatibility”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Bronzino, 1995
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In general, they offer a good signal-to-noise ratio because of their position and large surface and provide exact selectivity, namely the implanted muscle.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For recording purposes, electrodes made of silver/silver chloride in the form of bars (10 -1 mm) have been found to give adequate signal-to-noise ratio.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Multichannel (linear and high-density arrays) surface EMG electrodes have been developed that enable measurements of motor unit potentials size and number and provide topographical information that is beyond the capability of intramuscular needle electrodes”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Zwarts and Stegeman, 2003 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“they can also be employed to supply a perceivable sensation to the skin or to excite nerve tracts or muscles underneath the skin”
What the sources say
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Disadvantagesinclude the susceptibility to interference by environmental noise and vibrations and limited experience with its use.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A final issue with percutaneous electrodes is that muscle contractions may result in eventual breakage, although these problems have become less frequent with the improvement of electrodes and lead wires”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Onishi et al., 2000 source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The active recording electrode should be located near but not on the motor point because at this point the stability of signals suffers from minor physical displacement of the electrode”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites De Luca, 2002
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Further technical developments to increase sensitivity of measurements are needed before magnetic interfaces can be used for single-unit activity recordings.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although they can be used for EMG recording, the main application area is for muscle stimulation”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The number of electrodes to be used depends on the working application: low number of electrodes for robust use and limited functionality or high numbers for good spatial resolution and selectivity”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Muscle sounds have been used to measure twitch force, monitor fatigue and in the diagnosis of muscle diseases.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As a control signal for externally powered prostheses, acoustic myography may present some advantages over surface EMG because it is unaffected by changes in skin impedance, less sensitive to placement on the muscle, and requires less amplification and electrical shielding.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The impedance at the electrode-skin interface is largely variable between individuals at low frequencies, whereas at high frequencies the decline of impedance values with time depends on the electrode type”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Hewson et al., 2003 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“cuff and intrafascicular electrodes can be applied to intact nerves in acute or chronic studies, whereas, by definition, regenerative sieve electrodes are implanted in transected nerves that need to regenerate across the electrode sieve over several months.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“These electrodes may damage many muscle fibers, but in most instances this loss will not represent a noticeable reduction in muscle force”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Mortimer et al., 1980 source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“To minimize external contamination, measurements are usually performed inside a magnetically shielded room, thus limiting its application for control of neuroprostheses.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Compared with nerve cuff electrodes, intramuscular electrodes have been shown to produce more reliable, more graded, and less fatigable recruitment of motor units”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Singh et al., 2000
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition, high energy consumption is required to activate the muscle.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“To avoid problems derived from excess charge delivery, stimulation is given in cycles, and the system is explanted once regenerating axons reinnervate the muscles of interest.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“This device consists of a small cylindrical capsule (16 -2 mm) whose internal components are connected to electrodes sealed hermetically into its ends.”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Loeb et al., 2001 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Electrode and lead failures or infections have been found to be rare and the electrode response was stable over time in patients with intramuscular or epimysial electrodes during more than 3 years”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Kilgore et al., 2003 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In addition, the currents required to produce contractions are high and may induce discomfort and tissue damage”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Chae and Hart, 1998 source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Adequate EMG signals can be obtained with epimysial and intramuscular electrodes, but the fatigue of the muscle and the derived change of the recorded signal have to be taken into account for long-term use.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Tests performed indicated that the BION is a stable, biocompatible, and effective electrode when implanted passively or used to stimulate muscles in experimental animals for long-term implantation (Cameron et al., 1998) .”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Cameron et al., 1998 source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Management may be difficult when many epimysial electrodes on different muscles are used because of the interconnection between them, providing additional risks and possible source of failure.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Their main advantage of being non-invasive and easily adaptable is counteracted by several disadvantages, such as the need for daily placement and frequent calibration, and by the low reproducibility and quality of acquired signals.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Currently, recorded EMG signals are used to determine the activation time of a muscle, to estimate the force produced during muscle contraction and to estimate the rate of muscle fatigue.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Capacitive electrodes such as titanium nitride might reduce the risk of corrosion under stimulation conditions, but their performance highly varies with the fabrication technology”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Janders et al., 1996
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Weiland et al., 2002 source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For large muscles, the EMG activity mainly reflects the action potentials of motor units located more superficial or closer to the electrode.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“This requires the implantation and maintenance of many electrodes subjected to considerable mechanical stress caused by strong muscle contractions”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Devasahayam, 1992 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The choice of an adequate electrode size and material, in combination with a 'structural compatible' design, is always a compromise between electrode impedance, signal-to-noise ratio, and selectivity.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Direct muscle stimulation may be also used to recover chronically denervated muscles, although activation requires long duration pulses and extremely high current that are usually not generated by common FES devices”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Kern et al., 2002 source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“There was no gross evidence of axonal damage after 1 day, but chronic implants have not been reported.”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Tyler and Durand, 1997 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“For example, quasi-trapezoidal stimulation pulses have been shown to induce more gradual contraction than rectangular pulses, an effect that was attributed to activation of fatigue-resistant motor units before activation of large fast-fatigue units with cuff electrodes (Fang and Mortimer, 1991; Rozman et al., 1993) .”
What the sources say
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The use of short pulsewidths and the introduction of a subthreshold transverse current from a steering anode allows restriction of the region of excitation of the nerve trunk, significantly improving the selectivity of stimulation (Gorman and Mortimer, 1986; Sweeney et al., 1990; Grill and Mortimer, 1996b; Navarro et al., 2001) .”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Gorman and Mortimer, 1986
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Sweeney et al., 1990 source
- Not matchedcites Grill and Mortimer, 1996b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Although snug-fitting nerve cuffs have been advocated to reduce the stimulus charge injection or to obtain a high signal-to-noise ratio for neural recordings (Naples et al., 1990) , different studies have shown that chronic implantation of snug cuffs modifies the nerve shape and produces a loss of large nerve fibers, which are the most sensitive to compression (Krarup et al., 1989; Grill and Mort”
What the sources say
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Tripolar (central active electrode vs. two reference electrodes near the ends of the cuff) electrode configuration is preferred to reduce noise pickup (Stein et al., 1977) ; it provides a biophysically ideal way to use a differential amplifier to reject almost completely the large bioelectric signals arising from outside the cuff (e.g., EMG).”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Stein et al., 1977 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Histological cross-sections showed that the SPINE rearranges the epineurium and penetrates deep within a multifascicular nerve but did not disrupt the perineurium (Tyler and Durand, 1997) .”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Tyler and Durand, 1997 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“By flattening the nerve into a more elliptical shape, fascicles become more accessible and central fibers are moved closer to the stimulating electrode in comparison with cylindrical cuffs.”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Tyler and Durand, 2002 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The first micturition because of electrical nerve root stimulation was reported in 1973 (Brindley, 1973) .”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Brindley, 1973
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Postoperative infections after helicoidal electrode implants in vagus nerve patients occur in less than 3% of cases, requiring removal of the device in 1%.”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites McLachlan, 1997 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Helicoidal electrodes, placed circumjacent to the nerve, are made of flexible platinum ribbon with an open helical design (Fig. 5), allowing the electrode to conform to the shape of the nerve and minimizing mechanical trauma (Naples et al., 1990) .”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Naples et al., 1990
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Electrodes that moderately flattened the nerve demonstrated the best selectivity for limb motion measurements, which were maintained throughout the implant time (Tyler and Durand, 2003; Leventhal and Durand, 2004) .”
What the sources say
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The latter application is of limited benefit because it should be applied only when pain involves one nerve territory in the head or the limbs and has frequent morbidity associated with electrode approximation, electrode displacement, and lead failure (Hassenbusch et al., 1996) .”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Hassenbusch et al., 1996 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Results on acute experiments showed that it is possible to selectively activate individual fascicles of the cat sciatic nerve with the FINE, as well as groups of fibers within the fascicles, and revealed the strong dependency of selectivity on the relative locations of the fascicle and the electrode contacts (Tyler and Durand, 2002; Leventhal and Durand, 2003) .”
What the sources say
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Because ventral root stimulation produces simultaneous contraction of both sphincter and detrusor muscles, voiding is achieved in brief spurts at the end of the stimulation, when the striated sphincter muscle relaxes faster than the smooth detrusor muscle.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Occasional fracture of the electrode wire has been reported (McLachlan, 1997) .”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites McLachlan, 1997 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Nowadays, there are 2,000 patients worldwide that carry a urinary bladder stimulator (Rijkhoff, 2004) .”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Rijkhoff, 2004 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 2,000Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Epineurial electrodes are used in biomedical FES applications for breathing control by phrenic nerve stimulation (Creasey et al., 1996) , foot-drop improvement (Liberson et al., 1961) , and relief of neuropathic pain (Strege et al., 1994) .”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Creasey et al., 1996
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Liberson et al., 1961
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Strege et al., 1994 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Chronic studies in laboratory animals with FINE implanted over 1-3 months showed that electrodes applying high reshaping force induced nerve damage, whereas those with moderate and small forces did not cause any detectable change in nerve physiology and histology.”
What the sources say
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Applicability of regenerative electrodes is dependent on the success of axonal regeneration through the perforations or holes, the possibility of nerve damage from the mechanical load imposed by the electrode or from constrictive forces within the holes, and the biocompatibility of the components (Rosen et al., 1990; Navarro et al., 1996) .”
What the sources say
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Recruitment curves for the electrode array were broader with twitch thresholds starting at much lower currents than usual for cuff electrodes.”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Branner et al., 2001 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“An interesting study used a microelectrode to stimulate the sensory nerve of an operator to indicate contact with an object by a remote robotic hand (Shimojo et al., 2003) .”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Shimojo et al., 2003
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“One negative aspect was the gradual degradation of the electrode wire bundle.”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Warwick et al., 2003 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedSingle caseTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“To decrease the number of redundant electrodes and provide access to more fascicles within the nerve, a slanted array with electrodes of varying length, ranging from 0.5 to 1.5 mm with 0.1 mm difference in length between rows of neighboring electrodes, has been developed (Branner et al., 2001) .”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Branner et al., 2001 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Using multiple-hole silicon arrays, the researchers demonstrated axonal regeneration and even neural activity recording was demonstrated in peripheral nerves of rat, frog, and fish (Kovacs et al., 1994; Navarro et al., 1996; Bradley et al., 1997; Della Santina et al., 1997; Mensinger et al., 2000) .”
What the sources say
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Activity arising from cutaneous receptors in response to stimuli has been recorded in several studies, although activity was found to be small and difficult to distinguish from the background noise in the recording (Malmstrom et al., 1998; Yoshida et al., 2000) .”
What the sources say
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In a series of experimental and modeling studies, Rutten and colleagues concluded that an electrode separation of 120 m m was optimal for selective interfacing peripheral nerves, such as the rat peroneal”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Rutten, 2002 source
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Thus, a trade-off must be made between selectivity of stimulation and the total number of nerve fibers that can be activated; optimal selectivity requires the use of redundant electrodes in the 3D configuration (Rutten et al., 1999) .”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Rutten et al., 1999 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Microstimulation through the electrode can be used to activate single axons, although in most cases stimulation affects small groups of axons in the fascicle (Ochoa and Torebjo ¨ rk, 1983; Torebjo ¨ rk et al., 1987) .”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Ochoa and Torebjo ¨ rk, 1983 source
- Not matchedcites Torebjo ¨ rk et al., 1987
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Regenerating axons eventually grow through the holes (Fig. 12), making it possible to record action potentials from and to stimulate individual axons or small fascicles.”
What the sources say
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The subject received feedback information from force and slip sensors in a prosthetic hand and subsequently used the array to control the hand for grasping an unseen object.”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Warwick et al., 2003 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The stimulation properties stabilized in 80% of the electrodes over the course of the experiment, but the recorded sensory signals were not stable over time.”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Branner et al., 2004 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The Utah MEA is also capable of recording more effectively from more dorsal root ganglion neurons than has been achieved by conventional recording techniques, providing a more stable option for chronic implantation (Aoyagi et al., 2003) .”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Aoyagi et al., 2003 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Ideally a one-to-one design would allow access to each individual regenerated axon grown through one hole (2-10 m m in diameter). However, this has been proved impossible; nerve regeneration fails with holes of such small size.”
What the sources say
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Electrodes in the array were capable of selectively recording single-unit responses from mechanoreceptors, although only in 10-20% of the electrodes, and evoked graded recruitment of force in muscle groups in a highly selective fashion with current injections in the 1-20 m A range (Branner and Norman, 2000; Branner et al., 2001) .”
What the sources say
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“The LIFEs offer good selectivity for stimulation (Nannini and Horch, 1991; Yoshida and Horch, 1993) and for multiunit extracellular recording (Goodall et al., 1991; McNaughton and Horch, 1994; Yoshida and Stein, 1999) , and their geometry, make them suitable for longterm implantations (Lefurge et al., 1991) .”
What the sources say
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The use of multistrand Kevlar LIFEs (m-polyLIFE) increases the tensile strength and signal-to-noise ratio (Lawrence et al., 2004) .”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Lawrence et al., 2004 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“However, such silicon interfaces cause frequent signs of axonopathy and constitute a physical barrier that limits the elongation of regenerating axons depending on the size of the holes (Edell, 1986; Rosen et al., 1990; Navarro et al., 1996; Zhao et al., 1997) .”
What the sources say
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Both the recording and stimulation were stable over the 36-h-long period of the experiments.”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Branner et al., 2001 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Nevertheless, the loss of neurons in spiral ganglion and cochlear nucleus was found, thought to be due to difficulty with electrode insertion and chronic motion of the implants.”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Arts et al., 2003 source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“A silicon-based ribbon electrode with high flexibility demonstrated successful function after chronic implantation of up to 1 year (Hetke et al., 1994) , but this interconnect cable was not designed for implants in the highly mobile somatic peripheral nerve and was too stiff and brittle for intrafascicular application (Najafi and Hetke, 1990) .”
What the sources say
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the PNS, bioelectronic interfaces are in an early and experimental stage.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Pine et al . (1994) managed to place single hippocampus cells of the rat into a 3D silicon structure, which was termed 'cultured neuron probe.' They could demonstrate that the transplanted cells inside the microcompartments retained their capacity for axonal outgrowth and that nerve action potentials could be directly recorded extracellularly from the soma of the cells.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Pine et al., 1994
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedSingle caseTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“they obtained a current-free measurement of the membrane potential of a single neuron of a leech by direct coupling to the gate of a field effect transistor (FET) (Fromherz et al., 1991a)”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Fromherz et al., 1991a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedSingle caseTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“been possible to stimulate different nerve bundles and to record nerve action potentials in response to functional stimulation (Navarro et al., 1998; Ceballos et al., 2002)”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Navarro et al., 1998
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Ceballos et al., 2002 source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“the formal scheme for the acquisition and analysis of EMG signals for the control of prosthetic devices is composed of several modules (Zecca et al., 2002) : (1) signal conditioning, pre-processing, and detection of onset movement (Micera et al., 1999) ; (2) feature extraction; (3) dimensionality reduction; (4) pattern recognition; and (5) off-line and on-line learning.”
What the sources say
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“The fabrication of silicon-based interconnection cables was shown to be technologically feasible (Hetke et al., 1990; 1994)”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hetke et al., 1990; 1994
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“some time is needed for interfacing the regenerated axons, thus precluding acute experiments”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The presence of a polyimide-based regenerative electrode showed no chronic foreign body response, and the immunohistochemically measured pattern of characteristic proteins was comparable with a healing reaction without any implant (Klinge et al., 2001a) .”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Klinge et al., 2001a source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In this case, it is usually not possible to use the 'homologous' muscles to control the movements of the prosthetic device, and the development of a complex algorithm exploiting the potentialities of using advanced pattern recognition techniques is required.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“the EMG signal was modeled as the amplitude-modulated Gaussian noise whose variance is related to the force developed by the muscle.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Graupe and Cline, 1975; 1982
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Graupe et al., 1982 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“sEMG signals are easy to record and provide an important access to the neuromuscular system of the user.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“The structure's topology (e.g., the width of grooves) has an important impact on the growth of the cultured cells (Wilkinson et al., 1987; Clark et al., 1990; Connolly et al., 1992)”
What the sources say
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Silicone elastomer is still the material of choice for encapsulation of cables and also as additional coating for hermetically sealed electronic circuits (Stieglitz et al., 2004)”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Stieglitz et al., 2004 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Polyimide-based electrodes have been shown to be biocompatible and stable over months of in vivo implantation and allow for much better regeneration than silicon dice (Navarro et al., 1998; Ceballos et al., 2002; Lago et al., 2005) .”
What the sources say
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Fromherz et al . (1991b) could demonstrate the guided growth of nerve cells from leeches on a laminin-coated substrate.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Fromherz et al., 1991b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“One of the most logical and challenging applications of regenerative electrodes consists of their implantation in severed nerves of an amputee's limb for bidirectional interface in a feedback-controlled neuroprosthesis.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Here, a piece of a rat sciatic nerve was placed into a cone of 1.5 mm length and 100-200 m mdiameter. After implantation in the brain of a rat, neurite ingrowth was observed and stable recordings were obtained over 6 months.”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Kennedy, 1989 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedSingle caseTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Neither approach has been investigated in the PNS.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Materials typically used are platinum, iridium, tungsten, and stainless steel as conductors and silicone elastomer, polytetrafluoroethylene, and polyimide as insulating carriers (Naples et al., 1990; Heiduschka and Thanos, 1998)”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Naples et al., 1990
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Heiduschka and Thanos, 1998 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Having surface topologies on the substrate, axonal outgrowth of embryonic nerve cells from rats was observed and electrical activity was recorded in a microstructure with 16 electrodes that were connected with grooves (Jimbo and Kawana, 1992; Jimbo et al., 1993)”
What the sources say
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Reinnervation of the gastrocnemius and tibialis muscles via the distal stump of the sciatic nerve was observed after a few weeks, although there was no communication with the CNS.”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Katsuki et al., 1997 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“sensory feedback from tactile and force sensors might be provided to the user through stimulation of afferent nerve fibers within the residual limb (Riso, 1999)”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Riso, 1999 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“but cost, technology, and limited cable length limit widespread use in neural prostheses applications”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The devices are robust, stable, and reliable but suffer from a low spatial resolution and low selectivity of the electrodes as well as from a quite large size.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Functional regeneration was proven but the number of surviving cells tremendously decreased from the 10,000 that had been injected to some tens that finally innervated the muscle (T. Stieglitz, 2004. The neuron micro probe project, personal communication)”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites T. Stieglitz, 2004. The neuron micro probe project, personal communication source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“deterioration of the device may result in implant failure and the release of toxic products”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Using this approach, it was possible to control the different degrees of freedom of the shoulder reducing the muscular effort of the subjects.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Kiguchi et al., 2001; 2003
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Neuro-fuzzy models seem the most adequate because of their model-free structure.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Experimental tests have shown that the use of sEMG significantly improved the mechanical gain of the system (i.e., the possibility of augmenting capabilities and/or reducing human muscular efforts to carry out the different tasks) while maintaining natural control of the system.”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Rosen et al., 2001 source
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“At the moment, there is no universal best choice for all possible uses of the described interfaces”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Using this schemea one-degree-of-freedom exoskeleton has been controlled using a multiple-feedback approach: (1) dynamic feedback - the moments generated at the interfaces between the human arm, the external load, and the exoskeleton structure; (2) kinematic feedback -the joint angular trajectories recorded using encoders, and the angular velocity and acceleration calculated by finite differences;”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Rosen et al., 2001 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe quote only partly states this claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This approach seems promising for the development of EMG-based controlled hand prostheses although the use of EMG signals seems to be limited to prosthesis with a few degrees of freedom (probably no more than four).”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“by using this approach, the user must initiate all the contractions to control the prosthesis from rest, making it difficult to switch from one class to another and increasing the response time of the user when dealing with unexpected situations.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
Nerve fibers are recruited by electrical stimulation according to their thickness, so large motor fibers are activated earlier than thinner fibers.
“nerve fibers are recruited by electrical stimulation according to their thickness, therefore large motor fibers innervating the fast-fatigue and strong motor units are activated earlier than the physiologically first-recruited thinner fibers controlling slow fatigue-resistant motor units”
The paper relies on this without support.
Recruitment of motor units follows an order of size, with slow fatigue-resistant motor units activated first and large fast-fatigue motor units activated only at high levels of tension.
“Recruitment of motor units follows an order of size, with slow fatigue-resistant motor units activated first and large fast-fatigue motor units activated only at high levels of tension.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Signals are transmitted by axons in series of impulses or action potentials, with intensity mainly coded in impulse frequency along the peripheral axon.
“Signals are transmitted by the corresponding axons in series of impulses or action potentials, with intensity of the signal mainly coded in impulse frequency along the peripheral axon.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The fascicular architecture changes throughout the length of the nerve, with an increasing number of fascicles of smaller size in distal compared with proximal segments.
“The fascicular architecture changes throughout the length of the nerve, with an increasing number of fascicles of smaller size in distal with respect to proximal segments.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The perineurium is the main contributor to the tensile strength of the nerve, acts as a diffusion barrier, and maintains the endoneurial fluid pressure.
“The perineurium is the main contributor to the tensile strength of the nerve, acts as a diffusion barrier, and maintains the endoneurial fluid pressure.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Using multiple wire needles to interface a high number of nerve fibers has practical problems for long-term use.
“However, the use of multiple wire needles for interfacing a high number of nerve fibers has practical problems for long-term use.”
The paper relies on this without support.
No human implants of regenerative electrodes have been reported.
“No human implants of regenerative electrodes have been reported.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Cuff electrodes are the type of peripheral nervous system interface electrode most investigated in basic and applied research.
“Cuff electrodes are the type of PNS interface electrode most investigated in basic and applied research.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The neuromuscular system has non-linear and time-variant characteristics.
“the non-linear and time-variant characteristics of the neuromuscular system”
The paper relies on this without support.
A traumatic lesion of a peripheral nerve leads to Wallerian degeneration of the distal nerve.
“A traumatic lesion of a peripheral nerve leads to Wallerian degeneration of the distal nerve”
The paper relies on this without support.
Healing of a peripheral nerve lesion occurs only under favorable conditions involving sprouting of axons from the proximal stump, outgrowth along the distal stump, and reinnervation of target tissues.
“healing of such a lesion occurs only under favorable conditions involving sprouting of axons from the proximal nerve stump, outgrowth along the distal nerve stump, and reinnervation of target tissues”
The paper relies on this without support.
Recovery from a peripheral nerve lesion is usually delayed and limited if the lesion site is very proximal.
“Recovery is usually delayed and limited if the lesion site is very proximal.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Muscle atrophy prevents formation of new neuromuscular junctions at a later time when regenerating nerve fibers may reach the muscle.
“muscle atrophy prevents the formation of new neuromuscular junctions at a later time point when regenerating nerve fibers may reach the muscle”
The paper relies on this without support.
Regenerated nerve fibers have smaller than normal diameter and internodal length.
“the smaller than normal diameter and internodal length of regenerated fibers”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Although more challenging to carry out compared to nerve stimulation due to the distance between electrodes and the weak electrical signals transmitted by axons, with an ECM-rich epineurium separating the two, motor and sensory nerve signals gathered using cuff electrodes have been used to guide and fine-tune prostheses such as artificial limbs in human patients (Micera et al., 2001; Navarro et al”
From Foreign Body Reaction to Implanted Biomaterials and Its Impact in Nerve Neuroprosthetics (2021) · cites this paper as Navarro et al., 2005
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“For nerve stimulation at the clinical level, epineurial cuffs remain the preferred choice (Navarro et al., 2005).”
From Foreign Body Reaction to Implanted Biomaterials and Its Impact in Nerve Neuroprosthetics (2021) · cites this paper as Navarro et al., 2005
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“A thickening of the epineurium as part of FBR can dissipate the already weak electrical signals transmitted by axons, limiting the use of these devices for electrical recording applications in long-term implantations (Navarro et al., 2005).”
From Foreign Body Reaction to Implanted Biomaterials and Its Impact in Nerve Neuroprosthetics (2021) · cites this paper as Navarro et al., 2005
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Based on the degree of invasiveness nerve neuroprosthetic designs can be categorized into three different groups (summarized in Figures 4, 5).”
From Foreign Body Reaction to Implanted Biomaterials and Its Impact in Nerve Neuroprosthetics (2021) · cites this paper as Navarro et al., 2005
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Most commonly this is in the form of a full nerve transection, where the two ends of the nerve are cleanly separated and a gap forms between the two (Navarro et al., 2005; Thompson et al., 2015).”
From Foreign Body Reaction to Implanted Biomaterials and Its Impact in Nerve Neuroprosthetics (2021) · cites this paper as Navarro et al., 2005
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“However, current peripheral nerve interfaces have limitations, which minimize their clinical utility (1, 2).”
From A regenerative peripheral nerve interface allows real-time control of an artificial hand in upper limb amputees (2020) · cites this paper as [2]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Many electrodes have been developed for peripheral nerves (Warren et al., 2016) and a comparison of their performance been conducted more than a decade ago (Navarro et al., 2005), but an extensive, quantitative comparison (on e.g., longevity and spatial resolution) of their use in neuroprostheses in recent literature is absent.”
From Update on Peripheral Nerve Electrodes for Closed-Loop Neuroprosthetics (2018) · cites this paper as Navarro et al., 2005
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“However, clinical practice of peripheral nerve stimulation for the control of neuroprosthesis is limited (Navarro et al., 2005).”
From Update on Peripheral Nerve Electrodes for Closed-Loop Neuroprosthetics (2018) · cites this paper as Navarro et al., 2005
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“But even with this definition, it is hard to compare the electrodes due to the difference in impedance, spatial resolution (Navarro et al., 2005) and inconsistent SNR results across studies published so far.”
From Update on Peripheral Nerve Electrodes for Closed-Loop Neuroprosthetics (2018) · cites this paper as Navarro et al., 2005
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“It can also be used to record signals from nerves for the intent of neuroprosthetic control; however the fact that the measurements are done in a magnetically shielded room restricts its use [12].”
From Interfaces with the peripheral nervous system for the control of a neuroprosthetic limb: a review (2020) · cites this paper as [12]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Data collected by Navarro et al. point to the fact that currently in clinical practice, implanted electrodes are generally extraneural [36].”
From Safety of long-term electrical peripheral nerve stimulation: review of the state of the art (2019) · cites this paper as [36]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The electrode's degree of invasiveness is an important factor in the neural response [5].”
From Active Neural Interface Circuits and Systems for Selective Control of Peripheral Nerves: A Review (2024) · cites this paper as [5]
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“However, the information on specifically interfacing the PNS to control these advanced prostheses is more sparse.”
From Interfaces with the peripheral nervous system for the control of a neuroprosthetic limb: a review (2020) · cites this paper as [12]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“State-of-the-art implants that target the PNS are, therefore, mainly based on flexible materials (Navarro et al. 2005).”
From Realizing flexible bioelectronic medicines for accessing the peripheral nerves – technology considerations (2018) · cites this paper as Navarro et al. 2005
Citations
Cites
Items 201–269 of 269
The Cooper cable: an implantable multiconductor cable for neurological prostheses
Donaldson, P. E. K. (1983) · Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing · doi:10.1007/bf02478508 · Cited by 42
Muscle preservation using an implantable electrical system after nerve injury and repair
Nicolaidis, S. C., & Williams, H. B. (2001) · Microsurgery · doi:10.1002/micr.1047 · Cited by 42
Multielectrode spiral cuff for ordered and reversed activation of nerve fibres
Rozman, J., Sovinec, B., Trlep, M., & Zorko, B. (1993) · Journal of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1016/0141-5425(93)90039-2 · Cited by 41
Action potential classification with dual channel intrafascicular electrodes
McNaughton, T. G., & Horch, K. W. (1994) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/10.301727 · Cited by 41
Graupe, D., & Kohn, K. (1997) · Neurological Research · doi:10.1080/01616412.1997.11740820 · Cited by 41
Inmann, A., & Haugland, M. (2004) · Medical Engineering & Physics · doi:10.1016/j.medengphy.2004.03.003 · Cited by 40 · cited 1×
“For example, for hand grasp neural prosthesis, a cuff placed around the palmar digital nerve recorded the activity from mechanoreceptors when a grasped object was slipping to regulate the force of grasping (Haugland and Hoffer, 1994; Haugland et al., 1994; Inmann and Haugland, 2004).”
MethodThe methodology and scope of human microneurography
Gandevia, S. C., & Hales, J. P. (1997) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/s0165-0270(97)02243-7 · Cited by 39
Neuro-electronic interfacing with multielectrode arrays
Rutten, W. L. C., Smit, J. P. A., Frieswijk, T. A., Bielen, J. A., Brouwer, A. L. H., Buitenweg, J. R., & Heida, C. (1999) · IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine · doi:10.1109/51.765188 · Cited by 39
Second‐Generation Microstimulator
Arcos, I., Davis, R., Fey, K., et al. (2002) · Artificial Organs · doi:10.1046/j.1525-1594.2002.06938.x · Cited by 39
Taylor, P., Tromans, A., Harris, K., & Swain, I. (2002) · Spinal Cord · doi:10.1038/sj.sc.3101250 · Cited by 38 · cited 2×
“, 1999), for standing and short-distance walking assistance (Graupe and Kohn, 1997), for control of postural hypotension (Taylor et al., 2002), and also for recording EMG signals devoted to artificial limb control (Zardoshti-Kermani et al.”
BackgroundGeddes, L. A., & Roeder, R. (2001) · Annals of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1114/1.1349699 · Cited by 37
Magnetoneurography: theory and application to peripheral nerve disorders
Mackert, B.-M. (2004) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2004.07.028 · Cited by 36 · cited 1×
“The main clinical perspective of magnetoneurography lies in the diagnosis of proximal mononeuropathies (plexus and root lesions), where conventional electrophysiological tests sometimes fail (Mackert, 2004).”
BackgroundMicrotechnical Interfaces to Neurons
Stieglitz, T., & Meyer, J.-U. (1998) · Topics in current chemistry · doi:10.1007/3-540-69544-3_6 · Cited by 34
Self-citationSantina, C. C. D., Kovacs, G. T. A., & Lewis, E. R. (1997) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/s0165-0270(96)00159-8 · Cited by 34
Flexible miniature ribbon cables for long‐term connection to implantable sensors
Hetke, J. F., Najafi, K., & Wise, K. D. (1990) · Sensors and Actuators A: Physical · doi:10.1016/0924-4247(90)87076-u · Cited by 33 · cited 1×
“The fabrication of silicon-based interconnection cables was shown to be technologically feasible (Hetke et al., 1990; 1994), but cost, technology, and limited cable length limit widespread use in neural prostheses applications.”
BackgroundProportional myoelectric control of a virtual object to investigate human efferent control
Gordon, K. E., & Ferris, D. P. (2004) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-004-1970-6 · Cited by 32
Hagbarth, K. E. (1993) · Muscle & Nerve · doi:10.1002/mus.880160702 · Cited by 31
Histological Reaction to Polyimide Films in the Cochlea
Haggerty, H. S., & Lusted, H. S. (1989) · Acta Oto-Laryngologica · doi:10.3109/00016488909127474 · Cited by 31
Microelectrode recordings from human peripheral nerves (microneurography)
Hagbarth, K. E. (2002) · Muscle & Nerve · doi:10.1002/mus.10144 · Cited by 31
Rupp, R., & Gerner, H. J. (2004) · Biomedizinische Technik/Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1515/bmt.2004.019 · Cited by 31
Postoperative Dysphagia versus Neurogenic Dysphagia: Scintigraphic Assessment
Valenza, V., Gajate, A. M. S., Galli, J., D’Alatri, L., Girolamo, S. D., Reale, F., & Paludetti, G. (2003) · Annals of Otology Rhinology & Laryngology · doi:10.1177/000348940311200106 · Cited by 30
Castro, M. C. F., & Cliquet, A. (2000) · Artificial Organs · doi:10.1046/j.1525-1594.2000.06569.x · Cited by 30
Microelectronic and nanoelectronic interfacing techniques for biological systems
Connolly, P., Moores, G. R., Monaghan, W., Shen, J., Britland, S., & Clark, P. (1992) · Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical · doi:10.1016/0925-4005(92)80041-u · Cited by 30
Stieglitz, T. (2004) · Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology · doi:10.1166/jnn.2004.075 · Cited by 30
Self-citationKrarup, C., Loeb, G. E., & Pezeshkpour, G. H. (1989) · Muscle & Nerve · doi:10.1002/mus.880121108 · Cited by 28
A sensorized thumb for force closed-loop control of hand neuroprostheses
Carpaneto, J., Micera, S., Zaccone, F., Vecchi, F., & Dario, P. (2003) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2003.819938 · Cited by 28
Self-citationJensen, W., Sinkjaer, T., & Sepulveda, F. (2002) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2002.802851 · Cited by 26
Preliminary experiments in nerve regeneration through laser-drilled holes in silicon chips
Rosen, J. M., Grosser, M., & Hentz, V. R. (1990) · Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience · doi:10.3233/rnn-1990-2205 · Cited by 25
A scaled electronically-configurable multichannel recording array
Ji, J., Najafi, K., & Wise, K. D. (1990) · Sensors and Actuators A Physical · doi:10.1016/0924-4247(89)80040-8 · Cited by 25
Peripheral nerve conduction recorded by a micro gradiometer system (micro-SQUID) in humans
Hoshiyama, M., Kakigi, R., & Nagata, O. (1999) · Neuroscience Letters · doi:10.1016/s0304-3940(99)00589-3 · Cited by 23
Krylow, A. M., Sandercock, T. G., & Rymer, W. Z. (1998) · Cited by 23
Prosthetic Stimulation of the Auditory System with Intraneural Electrodes
Arts, H. A., Jones, D. A., & Anderson, D. J. (2003) · Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology · doi:10.1177/00034894031120s905 · Cited by 22
How to Use Nerve Cuffs to Stimulate, Record or Modulate Neural Activity
Hoffer, J.-A., & Kallesøe, K. (2000) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.1201/9781420039054.ch5 · Cited by 21
Endoneural selective stimulating using wire-microelectrode arrays
Smit, J. P. A., Rutten, W. L. C., & Boom, H. B. K. (1999) · IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/86.808943 · Cited by 20
ICFEM 2000. Third IEEE International Conference on Formal Engineering Methods
(2000) · IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/86.867869 · Cited by 20
Flexible, polyimide-based neural interfaces
Stieglitz, T., Beutel, H., Keller, R., Schüettler, M., & Meyer, J.-U. (1999) · International Conference on Microelectronics for Neural, Fuzzy and Bio-Inspired Systems (MicroNeuro) · doi:10.1109/mn.1999.758853 · Cited by 20
Self-citationImplantable flexible electrodes for functional electrical stimulation.
Schneider, A. M., & Stieglitz, T. C. (2004) · PubMed · Cited by 19
Self-citationShimojo, M., Suzuki, T., Namiki, A., Saito, T., Kunimoto, M., Makino, R., Ogawa, H., Ishikawa, M., & Mabuchi, K. (2004) · 2003 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.03CH37422) · doi:10.1109/robot.2003.1241766 · Cited by 19
(1980) · PubMed · Cited by 19
A micromachined silicon sieve electrode for nerve regeneration applications
Akın, T., & Najafi, K. (2002) · International Conference on Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems · doi:10.1109/sensor.1991.148818 · Cited by 19
Walter, J. S., Griffith, P., Sweeney, J., Scarpine, V., Bidnar, M., McLane, J. A., & Robinson, C. J. (1997) · Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine · doi:10.1080/10790268.1997.11719475 · Cited by 18
Stieglitz, T., Schüettler, M., & Koch, K. P. (2004) · Biomedizinische Technik/Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1515/bmt.2004.015 · Cited by 17
Self-citationPerspectives on the role of afferent signals in control of motor neuroprostheses
Johnson, K. O., Popović, D., Riso, R. R., Koris, M., Van Doren, C., & Kantor, C. (1995) · Medical Engineering & Physics · doi:10.1016/1350-4533(95)00003-6 · Cited by 16
Implantable multielectrode array with on-chip signal processing
Najafi, K., & Wise, K. D. (1986) · Digest of technical papers/Digest of technical papers - IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference · doi:10.1109/isscc.1986.1157002 · Cited by 16
Katsuki, M., Atsuta, Y., & Hirayama, T. (1997) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0006-8993(97)00675-6 · Cited by 14
On the development of a biomechatronic system to record tendon sliding movements
Cavallaro, E., Cappiello, G., Micera, S., Carrozza, M., Rantanen, P., & Dario, P. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2005.846711 · Cited by 13
Self-citation(2004) · TECNALIA Publications (Fundación TECNALIA Research & Innovation) · Cited by 13
Self-citationThe influence of electrode size and type on surface stimulation of the quadriceps
Patterson, R. P., & Lockwood, J. S. (1993) · IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/86.242409 · Cited by 12
(2001) · PubMed · Cited by 12
Development of BION/spl trade/ technology for functional electrical stimulation: hermetic packaging
Singh, J., Peck, R. A., & Loeb, G. E. (2005) · doi:10.1109/iembs.2001.1020437 · Cited by 10
Klinge, P. M., Groos, S., Wewetzer, K., Haastert, K., Rosahl, S., Vafa, M. A., Hosseini, H., Samii, M., & Brinker, T. (2001) · Neuroreport · doi:10.1097/00001756-200105080-00043 · Cited by 10
Neuroprostheses used to restore male sexual or reproductive function.
Gs, B. (1995) · PubMed · Cited by 10
BRAIN-COMPUTER INTERFACES FOR VERBAL COMMUNICATION
Birbaumer, N., Strehl, U., & Hinterberger, T. (2004) · Series on Bioengineering and Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1142/9789812561763_0039 · Cited by 10
Hewson, D. J., Duchêne, J., & Hogrel, J. (2005) · Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) · doi:10.1109/iembs.2001.1019543 · Cited by 10
Controlled Mobilization after Flexor Tendon Repair: A Prospective Comparison of Two Methods
Kneafsey, B., O’Shaughnessy, M., Vidal, P., et al. (1994) · Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume) · doi:10.1016/0266-7681(94)90362-x · Cited by 8
Stief, C. G., Sauerwein, D., Thon, W. F., Allhoff, E. P., & Jonas, U. (1992) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(17)36526-6 · Cited by 8 · cited 1×
“The SARS can be also used to restore male sexual and reproductive function (Stief et al., 1992; Brindley, 1995).”
MethodNEURAL PROSTHESES FOR SPINAL CORD INJURED SUBJECTS
Popović, M. R., Keller, T., Morari, M., et al. (1998) · Cited by 5
Stieglitz, T., & Gross, M. (2001) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-59497-7_85 · Cited by 3
Self-citationMicroelectronic and Nanoelectronic Interfacing Techniques for Biological Systems
Connolly, P., Britland, S. T., Hussain, I., Monaghan, W., Moores, G. R., & Shen, J. (1991) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-84494-2_24 · Cited by 2
Some aspects of functional neuromuscular stimulation
Devasahayam, S. R. (1992) · Bioelectrochemistry and Bioenergetics · doi:10.1016/0302-4598(92)87036-t · Cited by 1
Biocompatibility of chronically implanted polymer-based intrafascicular electrodes
Lawrence, S. M., Larsen, J. O., Horch, K. W., Riso, R. R., & Sinkjær, T. (2003) · Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) · doi:10.1109/iembs.1999.802451
(1976) · PubMed
Some aspects of functional neuromuscular stimulation
Devasahayam, S. R. (1992) · Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry · doi:10.1016/0022-0728(92)85043-3
Selective Detrusor Activation By Electrical Sacral Nerve Root Stimulation in Spinal Cord Injury
Rijkhoff, N. J. M., Wijkstra, H., Kerrebroeck, P. E. V. V., et al. (1997) · The Journal of Urology · doi:10.1097/00005392-199704000-00112
Retina Implant — A BioMEMS Challenge
Meyer, J.-U. (2001) · Transducers ’01 Eurosensors XV · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-59497-7_3
Long-Term Results of Peripheral Nerve Stimulation for Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy
Hassenbusch, S. J., Stanton-Hicks, M. D., Schoppa, D., Walsh, J. G., & Covington, E. C. (1995) · Regional Anesthesia: The Journal of Neural Blockade in Obstetrics, Surgery, & Pain Control · doi:10.1136/rapm-00115550-199520021-00131
Pine, J., Maher, M., Potter, S., Tai, Y.-C., Tatic-Lucic, S., Wright, J., Buzsaki, G., & Bragin, A. (n.d.) · Proceedings of 18th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · doi:10.1109/iembs.1996.646466
Electrical stimulation of cultured neurons using a planar electrode array
Jimbo, Y., & Kawana, A. (1991) · Neuroscience Research Supplements · doi:10.1016/s0921-8696(06)80473-1
Liberson, W. T. (1962) · ASAIO Journal · doi:10.1097/00002480-196204000-00075
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 18
- Brindley GS, 1995, Neuroprostheses., 15
- Bronzino JD, 1995, Biomedical Engineering Handbook.
- CoganSF LiuY‐P McCaffreyM TwardochUM(1993). Thin film hermetic coatings. Quarterly Progress Report NIH‐NINDS Neural Prosthesis Program No. 5 N44‐NS‐2‐2311.
- De Luca CJ, 2002, Surface Electromyography: Detection and Recording.
- EdellDJ DevaneyL DurfeeWK GleasonEF GleasonKK HerndonTO ThompsonCV WrightonMS(1993). Bioresistant integrated circuits. Quarterly Progress Report NIH‐NINDS Neural Prosthesis Program No. 9 NO1‐NS‐0‐2399.
- Hoffer JA, 2001, Neural Prostheses for Restoration of Sensory and Motor Function., 139
- Llinás R, 1973, Brain Unit Activity During Behaviour., 105
- Naples GG, 1990, Neural Prostheses: Fundamental Studies, Biophysics and Bioengineering Series., 107
- Nishikawa D, 1999, IEEE IROS'99, Kyongju, 1592
- PineJ TaiY‐C BuzsakiG BraginA CarpiD(1994). The cultured neuron probe. Quarterly Progress Report NIH‐NINDS Neural Prosthesis Program No. 4 NO1‐NS‐3‐2393.
- Popovic DB, 1992, Neural Prostheses Replacing Motor Function After Disease or Disability., 233
- Roblee LS, 1990, Neural Prostheses: Fundamental Studies, Biophysics and Bioengineering Series., 26
- Santa‐Cruz MC, 2000, IFESS 2000, 436
- SinghJ PeckRA LoebGE(2001). Development of BIONs technology for functional electrical stimulation: hermetic packaging. Proceedings of the 23th Annual International Conference of IEEE Eng Med and Bio Soc.
- Stein RB, 1992, Neural Prostheses. Replacing Motor Function After Diseases or Disability
- StieglitzT HabererW KammerS SchanzeT(2003). A simple model to investigate the stability of flexible micromachined retina stimulators. Proceedings of the 8th Annual International Conference of the International Functional Electrical Stimulation Society pp69–73.
- Tatic‐LucicS TaiY‐C WrightJA PineJ DenisonT(1993). Silicon‐micromachined neurochips for in vitro studies of cultured neural networks. Proceedings of the International Conference on Solid State Sensors and Actuators pp943–946.
- Tyler DJ, 1994, Interfascicular electrical stimulation for selectively activating axons, IEEE–EMBS Mag, 13, 575
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Brain–machine interfaces: past, present and future
Lebedev, M. A., & Nicolelis, M. A. L. (2006) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2006.07.004 · Cited by 1,875
“37 Navarro, X. et al. (2005) A critical review of interfaces with the peripheral nervous system for the control of neuroprostheses and”
BackgroundRestoring natural sensory feedback in real-time bidirectional hand prostheses
Raspopovic, S., Capogrosso, M., Petrini, F. M., Bonizzato, M., Rigosa, J., Di Pino, G., Carpaneto, J., Controzzi, M., Boretius, T., Fernandez, E., et al. (2014) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3006820 · Cited by 1,001
“In parallel, the rapid development of neural interfaces for the peripheral nervous system (16) has provided potential for new tools through which bidirectional communication with nerves in the stump could be potentially restored.”
BackgroundSelf-citationSurface Electromyography Signal Processing and Classification Techniques
Chowdhury, R. H., Reaz, M. B. I., Ali, M. H., Bakar, A. A. A., Chellappan, K., & Chang, T. (2013) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s130912431 · Cited by 1,013
“For this reason, they are widely used as surface electrodes [7].”
MethodFarina, D., Jiang, N., Rehbaum, H., Holobar, A., Graimann, B., Dietl, H., & Aszmann, O. C. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2014.2305111 · Cited by 999
A comprehensive review on emerging artificial neuromorphic devices
Zhu, J., Zhang, T., Yang, Y., & Huang, R. (2020) · Applied Physics Reviews · doi:10.1063/1.5118217 · Cited by 783
Metadata
- Authors
- Navarro, X., Krueger, T. B., Lago, N., Micera, S., Stieglitz, T., & Dario, P.
- Affiliations
- Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
- University of Freiburg (DE)
- Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Navarro, Xavier
- Venue
- Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-09
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 229-258
- ISSN
- 1085-9489 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-8027
- OpenAlex
- W2108068079
- Cited by
- 845
- References
- 259
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 58 · 2018: 53 · 2017: 49 · 2016: 60 · 2015: 57 · 2014: 58 · 2013: 45 · 2012: 28
- FWCI
- 2.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Publikationsdatenbank der Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion)
- Fraunhofer-Publica (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion)
- CINECA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- European Commission (IST-001917)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
- Keywords
- neural prostheses, peripheral nerve interfaces, peripheral nerve stimulation, neuromuscular stimulation, electromyography, surface electrodes, cuff electrodes, intrafascicular electrodes, electrode design, tissue damage, robotic prostheses
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Bionics, Electrodes, Electromyography, Humans, User-Computer Interface, Peripheral Nervous System, Prostheses and Implants
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-01, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-01 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review