The DOI matches its Crossref record; 139 of the 141 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 2 of the 166 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Nanotechnology approaches for global infectious diseases
Abstract
Infectious diseases are a major driver of morbidity and mortality globally. Treatment of malaria, tuberculosis and human immunodeficiency virus infection are particularly challenging, as indicated by the ongoing transmission and high mortality associated with these diseases. The formulation of new and existing drugs in nano-sized carriers promises to overcome several challenges associated with the treatment of these diseases, including low on-target bioavailability, sub-therapeutic drug accumulation in microbial sanctuaries and reservoirs, and low patient adherence due to drug-related toxicities and extended therapeutic regimens. Further, nanocarriers can be used for formulating vaccines, which represent a major weapon in our fight against infectious diseases. Here we review the current burden of infectious diseases with a focus on major drivers of morbidity and mortality. We then highlight how nanotechnology could aid in improving existing treatment modalities. We summarize our progress so far and outline potential future directions to maximize the impact of nanotechnology on the global population.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This review argues that nanocarriers can improve treatment of global infectious diseases by enabling sustained, local, targeted, and resistance-overcoming drug delivery, with the most clinically advanced examples in HIV and promising preclinical work in TB and malaria. It also highlights mRNA/lipid nanoparticle vaccines for SARS-CoV-2 and outlines cost, manufacturing, regulatory, and patient-acceptance barriers to translation.
Key findings
Long-acting injectable antiretroviral nanosuspensions are the most clinically advanced nanotechnology in HIV: cabotegravir and rilpivirine nanosuspensions (mean diameter 200 nm) had estimated half-lives of 25–54 days and 44–61 days, respectively, enabling dosing every 1–3 months, and in Phase IIb trials the combination suppressed disease equivalently to oral tablets. Preclinical nanomedicines improved anti-infective exposure and efficacy: pulmonary itraconazole nanoparticles gave tenfold higher lung drug concentrations than oral Sporanox, liposomal ciprofloxacin doubled lung half-life (~3 h versus ~1.5 h) and produced no deaths in a *Francisella tularensis* model versus all untreated/free-drug mice dying within 14 days, and imipenem-loaded poly(caprolactone) nanoparticles reduced MICs 250-fold and 62.5-fold versus free imipenem in resistant *K. pneumoniae* and *P. aeruginosa*. In TB, oral solid lipid nanoparticles produced no detectable tubercle bacilli after five doses given every tenth day, whereas 46 daily doses of free drugs were required for the same benefit. mRNA-based vaccines using lipid nanocarriers showed >90% efficacy against SARS-CoV-2, illustrating the translational impact of nanotechnology.
Methods
Narrative review of nanotechnology approaches for global infectious diseases, with a stated focus on HIV, TB, and malaria and additional discussion of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA/protein vaccines. Evidence base consists of published preclinical and clinical studies, including rodent and non-human primate models, clinical trials, and examples from clinicaltrials.gov; no systematic search strategy, inclusion criteria, or meta-analysis is reported. Main analysis is a qualitative synthesis of selected examples across sustained systemic delivery, local delivery, targeted delivery, resistance overcoming, and advanced preclinical/clinical technologies.
Limitations
The paper states that translation is limited by cost, synthesis/storage conditions in low-resource settings, reproducibility and bulk production, regulatory differences across authorities, and patient acceptability; it also notes that enhanced nanocarrier permeability and infection-site targeting are not clearly established in humans, may correlate with infection severity, and often rely on intravenous administration that may be impractical in resource-limited or mass-drug-administration settings. For long-acting injectables, the paper states limitations including need for caregiver administration, common injection-site reactions, refrigeration requirements for rilpivirine, no mechanism to withdraw drug exposure after injection, and restriction to drugs with daily oral doses below 25–50 mg. Evident from the text: as a narrative review, the evidence is selectively presented rather than systematically synthesized, many cited examples remain preclinical or rodent-based, and no quantitative pooled effect estimates are provided.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
146 Not checked yet · 37 Own interpretation · 2 Partly supported · 1 No basis given · accuracy not yet measured
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“a recent study used spontaneous nanoliposome antigen particleization to show efficacy of a multistage, multi-antigen vaccine in mice and rabbits 116 .”
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [116] Huang, W.-C. et al. A malaria vaccine adjuvant based on recombinant antigen binding to liposomes. Nat. Nanotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-018-0271-3 (2018). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Antigen multiplexing section reports that a multistage, multi-antigen SNAP vaccine induced antibodies in mice that recognized the expected parasite life stages. The Antigen particleization section and Rabbit immunization methods report rabbit results for Pfs25 alone, not for the multi-antigen vaccine. The claim therefore overstates what was shown in rabbits. (LLM, conf=0.88)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
In the paper
“HIV-infected individuals require lifelong treatment to ensure control of the viral burden 10 .”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [10] Kirtane, A. R., Langer, R. & Traverso, G. Past, present, and future drug delivery systems for antiretrovirals. J. Pharm. Sci. 105, 3471–3482 (2016). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Unfortunately, clinical trials for these infectious diseases (IDs) are also lagging compared with conditions such as cancer and cardiovascular diseases (Fig. 1d) 1”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [1] Roth, G. A. et al. Global, regional, and national age-sex-specific mortality for 282 causes of death in 195 countries and territories, 1980–2017: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease Study 2017. Lancet 392, 1736–1788 (2018). source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“To treat TB, a combination of pills must be consumed over a period of several months to years-often multiple times a day 11 .”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [11] Treatment of Tuberculosis: Guidelines 4th edn (WHO, 2010); https://www.who.int/tb/publications/2010/9789241547833/en/
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The lack of safe and effective drugs is central to our inability to treat IDs 2 .”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [2] Kinch, M. S., Patridge, E., Plummer, M. & Hoyer, D. An analysis of FDA-approved drugs for infectious disease: antibacterial agents. Drug Discov. Today 19, 1283–1287 (2014). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Prolonged and complicated dosing regimens with high pill burden result in lower patient adherence and, ultimately, failure of treatment.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
In the paper
“Dwindling amounts of drug released during the terminal phase of the release period may lead to a 'long pharmacologic tail' 20 , a period of slowly declining drug levels.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [20] Landovitz, R. J., Kofron, R. & McCauley, M. The promise and pitfalls of long-acting injectable agents for HIV prevention. Curr. Opin. HIV AIDS 11, 122–128 (2016). source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Following subcutaneous or intramuscular injection, drug absorption into systemic circulation is dictated by the rate of dissolution of the drug crystals in the interstitial fluid 16 .”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [16] Trezza, C., Ford, S. L., Spreen, W., Pan, R. & Piscitelli, S. Formulation and pharmacology of long-acting cabotegravir. Curr. Opin. HIV AIDS 10, 239–245 (2015). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Compared with systemic administration, local delivery to the site of infection is likely to enhance on-target (and minimize off-target) drug exposure.”
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
In the paper
“Leakage out of the vaginal tract was highest for uncoated nanoparticles (~13% of the dose within 0.5 h).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [23] Cu, Y., Booth, C. J. & Saltzman, W. M. In vivo distribution of surface-modified PLGA nanoparticles following intravaginal delivery. J. Control. Release 156, 258–264 (2011). source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Improved tissue uptake of PEGylated nanoparticles may be attributed to their higher diffusivity through the mucous layer-an observation shown using multiple particle tracking experiments by the Hanes lab 24 .”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [24] Lai, S. K. et al. Rapid transport of large polymeric nanoparticles in fresh undiluted human mucus. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 1482–1487 (2007). source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Second, in rodent models, drug concentrations become undetectable at about 24 h post-dose, suggesting that sustained delivery may be possible for only a relatively short time.”
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Several barriers impede complete coverage of the vaginal tract and prolonged residence of the drug delivery system 21 .”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [21] das Neves, J., Nunes, R., Machado, A. & Sarmento, B. Polymer-based nanocarriers for vaginal drug delivery. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 92, 53–70 (2015). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Despite early positive results in clinical trials for urinary tract infections and Mycobacterium infections 15 , development of the formulation was discontinued in 2000.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [15] Schiffelers, R., Storm, G. & Bakker-Woudenberg, I. Liposome-encapsulated aminoglycosides in pre-clinical and clinical studies. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 48, 333–344 (2001). source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Finally, encapsulation in nanocarriers may protect labile drugs (such as nucleic acids) in harsh physiological conditions such as low pH or the presence of enzymes.”
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“However, the improved tissue concentrations were observed only within the first hour of administration, and not at later times.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [25] Cunha-Reis, C. et al. Nanoparticles-in-film for the combined vaginal delivery of anti-HIV microbicide drugs. J. Control. Release 243, 43–53 (2016). source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In murine skin infection models of S. aureus and methicillin-resistant S. aureus biofilms, nitric oxide-releasing nanoparticles decreased overall wound bacterial burden compared with both unloaded nanoparticles and the control group 39 .”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [39] Martinez, L. R. et al. Antimicrobial and healing efficacy of sustained release nitric oxide nanoparticles against Staphylococcus aureus skin infection. J. Invest. Dermatol. 129, 2463–2469 (2009). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These benefits cannot be attributed completely to nanoformulation as changing the route of administration from oral to pulmonary is likely to contribute heavily to this improvement.”
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Administering the antiretroviral azidothymidine in poly(hexacyanoacrylate) nanoparticles improved its accumulation in reticuloendothelial system (RES) organs such as the liver, lungs and spleen 44 .”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [44] Löbenberg, R., Araujo, L., von Briesen, H., Rodgers, E. & Kreuter, J. Body distribution of azidothymidine bound to hexyl-cyanoacrylate nanoparticles after i.v. injection to rats. J. Control. Release 50, 21–30 (1998). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Nanocarriers are predominantly cleared by macrophages.
In the paper
“In mouse studies, pulmonary delivery of amorphous itraconazole nanoparticles resulted in a tenfold higher drug concentration in the lungs compared with oral administration of its commercial formulation (Sporanox) and the unformulated drug 31 .”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [31] Vaughn, J. M. et al. Single dose and multiple dose studies of itraconazole nanoparticles. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 63, 95–102 (2006). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The half-life of the liposome-encapsulated drug in mouse lungs was about double that of the free drug (~3 h versus ~1.5 h).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [33] Wong, J. P. et al. Liposome delivery of ciprofloxacin against intracellular Francisella tularensis infection. J. Control. Release 92, 265–273 (2003). source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In comparison with the free drug, the nanoparticle-encapsulated quorum sensing inhibitor showed better in vitro control of virulence as measured by quantifying levels of a bacterial product (pyocyanin).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [34] Nafee, N. et al. Antibiotic-free nanotherapeutics: ultra-small, mucus-penetrating solid lipid nanoparticles enhance the pulmonary delivery and anti-virulence efficacy of novel quorum sensing inhibitors. J. Control. Release 192, 131–140 (2014). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In a mouse model of lethal HSV-2 infection, intravaginal administration of oligofectamine-complexed small interfering RNA (siRNA) targeting genes encoding viral envelope and DNA binding proteins resulted in improved survival compared with untreated controls 27 .”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [27] Palliser, D. et al. An siRNA-based microbicide protects mice from lethal herpes simplex virus 2 infection. Nature 439, 89–94 (2006). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Interestingly, a study found that 60% of clinical samples from chronic infection sites contained biofilms compared with 6% found in acute infections 38 .”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [38] James, G. A. et al. Biofilms in chronic wounds. Wound Repair Regen. 16, 37–44 (2008). source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“N -acetyl cysteine enhanced the diffusivity of DNA-loaded poly(lysine) polyplexes in the sputum of cystic fibrosis patients by more than fivefold 36 .”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [36] Suk, J. S. et al. N-acetylcysteine enhances cystic fibrosis sputum penetration and airway gene transfer by highly compacted DNA nanoparticles. Mol. Ther. 19, 1981–1989 (2011). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“However, formulations that cannot penetrate mucous layers and biofilms have low pulmonary bioavailability due to rapid enzymatic deactivation, sequestration and elimination by coughing 22,29 .”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [22] Leal, J., Smyth, H. D. C. & Ghosh, D. Physicochemical properties of mucus and their impact on transmucosal drug delivery. Int. J. Pharm. 532, 555–572 (2017). source
- Not checked yetcites [29] Roy, I. & Vij, N. Nanodelivery in airway diseases: challenges and therapeutic applications. Nanomedicine 6, 237–244 (2010). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Confocal microscopy also demonstrated that polysorbate 80-coated nanoparticles diffused across porcine mucous.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [34] Nafee, N. et al. Antibiotic-free nanotherapeutics: ultra-small, mucus-penetrating solid lipid nanoparticles enhance the pulmonary delivery and anti-virulence efficacy of novel quorum sensing inhibitors. J. Control. Release 192, 131–140 (2014). source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In a murine Aspergillus fumigatus infection model, the same group observed an increased median survival in the pulmonary nanoparticle treated group (7.5 days) compared with oral Sporanox treated group (5 days) 32 .”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [32] Alvarez, C. A. et al. Aerosolized nanostructured itraconazole as prophylaxis against invasive pulmonary aspergillosis. J. Infect. 55, 68–74 (2007). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Improved on-target accumulation occurs because of enhanced nanocarrier permeability at sites of infection compared with uninfected tissue.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Furthermore, they found that nanoparticles were able to decrease Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm formation by > 70% compared with untreated controls 35 .”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [35] Duong, H. T. T. et al. Nanoparticle (star polymer) delivery of nitric oxide effectively negates Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm formation. Biomacromolecules 15, 2583–2589 (2014). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Hence, strategies that enhance intracellular accumulation of drugs and targeting to subcellular locations may improve efficacy.”
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Both drug molecules and pathogens are unevenly distributed within host cells, and in the absence of colocalization, efficacy is compromised.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“due to the non-specific biodistribution of nanocarriers that typically precedes triggering, drug release at non-target sites cannot be avoided.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: For triggered-release systems, some drug leakage is generally observed even in the absence of triggers.
In the paper
“Local injection of anti-protein A-functionalized nanoparticles was observed to be nearly twice as effective at killing S. aureus in murine cutaneous infection models compared with the control 57 .”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [57] Kim, M.-H. et al. Magnetic nanoparticle targeted hyperthermia of cutaneous Staphylococcus aureus infection. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 41, 598–609 (2013). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A common limitation of these studies is that comparison of the stimuli-sensitive nanoparticles with non-degradable nanoparticles was not performed.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“There have also been several studies that show higher accumulation of nanocarriers at sites of infection compared with non-infected sites (reviewed in ref. 47 ).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [47] Laverman et al. Liposomes for scintigraphic detection of infection and inflammation. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 37, 225–235 (1999). source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although nanoencapsulation may enhance drug accumulation at sites of infection, there are certain limitations when translating from rodent models to humans.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Nanoencapsulation may enhance drug accumulation at sites of infection.
- Rests on an assumption: Drug accumulation at sites of infection is increased in rodent models, but a substantial fraction of the drug is at off-target locations.
In the paper
“Binding of the antibody-functionalized nanoparticles to cultures of S. aureus was quantified by flow cytometry and demonstrated a 2.5-fold increase in binding compared with the IgG-coated nanoparticles.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [57] Kim, M.-H. et al. Magnetic nanoparticle targeted hyperthermia of cutaneous Staphylococcus aureus infection. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 41, 598–609 (2013). source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In one study 48 , there was an ~40-fold greater liposome concentration (per cent injected dose per gram of tissue) in the abscess compared with the muscle.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [48] Laverman, P. et al. Microscopic localization of PEG-liposomes in a rat model of focal infection. J. Control. Release 75, 347–355 (2001). source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The change in vascular permeability and drug targeting depended, in part, on the infectious agent.”
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
In the paper
“Mannose-functionalized liposomes showed a 1.5-fold higher exposure in alveolar macrophages compared with unmodified liposomes.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [54] Chono, S., Tanino, T., Seki, T. & Morimoto, K. Efficient drug targeting to rat alveolar macrophages by pulmonary administration of ciprofloxacin incorporated into mannosylated liposomes for treatment of respiratory intracellular parasitic infections. J. Control. Release 127, 50–58 (2008). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Expression of certain targets/receptors in diseased areas may be elevated.
In the paper
“In a mouse model of pulmonary P. aeruginosa infection, treatment with targeted nanoparticles improved survival over the free-drug control by nearly 50 percentage points.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [62] Zhang, C. Y., Gao, J. & Wang, Z. Bioresponsive nanoparticles targeted to infectious microenvironments for sepsis management. Adv. Mater. 30, 1803618 (2018). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Drug molecules released while nanocarriers are in circulation are subject to non-selective distribution.
In the paper
“The benefit of PEG coating was reduced at low infection severity.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [51] Bakker-Woudenberg, I. A. et al. Liposomes with prolonged blood circulation and selective localization in Klebsiella pneumoniae-infected lung tissue. J. Infect. Dis. 168, 164–171 (1993). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Importantly, in rats that had the most severe lung infection, PEG-coated liposomes (half-life = 27 h) resulted in approximately fourfold higher concentrations compared with uncoated liposomes (half-life = 19 h) 51 .”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [51] Bakker-Woudenberg, I. A. et al. Liposomes with prolonged blood circulation and selective localization in Klebsiella pneumoniae-infected lung tissue. J. Infect. Dis. 168, 164–171 (1993). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“some studies show that the degree of targeting is directly correlated with the severity of infection 51,52 .”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [51] Bakker-Woudenberg, I. A. et al. Liposomes with prolonged blood circulation and selective localization in Klebsiella pneumoniae-infected lung tissue. J. Infect. Dis. 168, 164–171 (1993). source
- Not checked yetcites [52] Bakker-Woudenberg, I. A., Lokerse, A. F., ten Kate, M. T. & Storm, G. Enhanced localization of liposomes with prolonged blood circulation time in infected lung tissue. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1138, 318–326 (1992). source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Poor drug diffusion across the host cell membrane and its active efflux via drug transporters can reduce activity against intracellular pathogens 63 .”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [63] Carryn, S. et al. Intracellular pharmacodynamics of antibiotics. Infect. Dis. Clin. North Am. 17, 615–634 (2003). source
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In a zebrafish model of methicillin-resistant S. aureus infection, the phosphatase-sensitive nanoparticles enhanced survival by 20 percentage points over free-drug controls.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [60] Xiong, M.-H. et al. Bacteria-responsive multifunctional nanogel for targeted antibiotic delivery. Adv. Mater. 24, 6175–6180 (2012). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Drug molecules released while nanocarriers are in circulation are subject to non-selective distribution.
In the paper
“In an in vitro model of recombinant S. typhirium infection, gentamicin-loaded pH-sensitive liposomes showed threefold higher activity than the free drug.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [65] Lutwyche, P. et al. Intracellular delivery and antibacterial activity of gentamicin encapsulated in pH-sensitive liposomes. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42, 2511–2520 (1998). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In a 20 day efficacy study, 100% of the mice administered the peptide-functionalized nanoparticles survived, compared with roughly 40% survival in the non-functionalized-nanoparticle and free-vancomycin cohorts.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [56] Hussain, S. et al. Antibiotic-loaded nanoparticles targeted to the site of infection enhance antibacterial efficacy. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 2, 95–103 (2018). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In comparison with the free drug, the targeted liposomes showed a 23-fold higher bioavailability in the alveolar macrophages.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [54] Chono, S., Tanino, T., Seki, T. & Morimoto, K. Efficient drug targeting to rat alveolar macrophages by pulmonary administration of ciprofloxacin incorporated into mannosylated liposomes for treatment of respiratory intracellular parasitic infections. J. Control. Release 127, 50–58 (2008). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“at an acidic pH, the plug is lost, resulting in drug release.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [66] Clemens, D. L. et al. Targeted Intracellular delivery of antituberculosis drugs to Mycobacterium tuberculosis-infected macrophages via functionalized mesoporous silica nanoparticles. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 56, 2535–2545 (2012). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Confocal microscopy showed that only pH-sensitive liposomes released the marker intracellularly in murine macrophages.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [65] Lutwyche, P. et al. Intracellular delivery and antibacterial activity of gentamicin encapsulated in pH-sensitive liposomes. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42, 2511–2520 (1998). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“initial work done by Langer and Folkman 70 , which showed that macromolecules such as proteins could be encapsulated in small polymer-based carriers”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [70] Langer, R. & Folkman, J. Polymers for the sustained release of proteins and other macromolecules. Nature 263, 797–800 (1976). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Despite higher cell uptake of pH-insensitive liposomes, they showed inferior activity to the pH-sensitive formulation.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [65] Lutwyche, P. et al. Intracellular delivery and antibacterial activity of gentamicin encapsulated in pH-sensitive liposomes. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42, 2511–2520 (1998). source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Marker release was abrogated by bafilomycin, an inhibitor of endosome acidification.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [65] Lutwyche, P. et al. Intracellular delivery and antibacterial activity of gentamicin encapsulated in pH-sensitive liposomes. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42, 2511–2520 (1998). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The evolution of antibiotic-degrading enzymes is a major mechanism causing bacterial resistance.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [3] Munita, J. M. & Arias, C. A. Mechanisms of antibiotic resistance. Microbiol. Spectrum 4, VMBF-0016-2015. (2016). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Peptide-based antigen assembled into nanoparticles have also been developed for vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 78 .”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [78] Tian, J.-H. et al. SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein vaccine candidate NVX-CoV2373 immunogenicity in baboons and protection in mice. Nat. Commun. 12, 372 (2021). source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Couvreur and colleagues showed that poly(cyanoacrylate) nanoparticles colocalized with S. typhirium in phagosomes of macrophages, resulting in enhanced intracellular targeting of ampicillin 79 .”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [79] Pinto-Alphandary, H. et al. Intracellular visualization of ampicillin-loaded nanoparticles in peritoneal macrophages infected in vitro with Salmonella typhimurium. Pharm. Res. 11, 38–46 (1994). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Liposomes have also been used for protecting drugs against bacterial enzymes 83 .”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [83] Nacucchio, M. C., Bellora, M. J., Sordelli, D. O. & D’Aquino, M. Enhanced liposome-mediated activity of piperacillin against staphylococci. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 27, 137–139 (1985). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“They also allow drugs to be administered to dysphagic patients, for example individuals infected with HIV and suffering from opportunistic oesophageal infections 88 .”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [88] Swindells, S., Flexner, C., Fletcher, C. V. & Jacobson, J. M. The critical need for alternative antiretroviral formulations, and obstacles to their development. J. Infect. Dis. 204, 669–674 (2011). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Multiple antimicrobial agents can be packaged within the same nanoparticle to increase the likelihood of overcoming existing drug resistance mechanisms instead of using one drug alone (Fig. 4e).”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Local disruption of the biofilms increased the permeability and therefore susceptibility to the antibiotic tobramycin.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [81] Teirlinck, E. et al. Laser-induced vapour nanobubbles improve drug diffusion and efficiency in bacterial biofilms. Nat. Commun. 9, 4518 (2018). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Toti et al. found that PLGA nanoparticles loaded with a fluorescent dye accumulated with chlamydial inclusion bodies in infected human lung epithelial cells 80 .”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [80] Toti, U. S. et al. Targeted delivery of antibiotics to intracellular chlamydial infections using PLGA nanoparticles. Biomaterials 32, 6606–6613 (2011). source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Teirlinck et al. showed that laser irradiation of gold nanoparticles resulted in the formation of nanobubbles that disrupted this diffusional barrier 81 .”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [81] Teirlinck, E. et al. Laser-induced vapour nanobubbles improve drug diffusion and efficiency in bacterial biofilms. Nat. Commun. 9, 4518 (2018). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Shaaban et al. developed poly(caprolactone) nanoparticles loaded with imipenem 82 and found that drug-loaded nanoparticles conferred 250- and 62.5-fold decreases in minimal inhibitory concentrations compared with free imipenem in in vitro cultures of imipenem-resistant K. pneumoniae and P. aeruginosa , respectively.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [82] Shaaban, M. I., Shaker, M. A. & Mady, F. M. Imipenem/cilastatin encapsulated polymeric nanoparticles for destroying carbapenem-resistant bacterial isolates. J. Nanobiotechnol. 15, 29 (2017). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Specifically, nanoparticles of two antiretrovirals, cabotegravir and rilpivirine, are being actively pursued in the clinic.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [16] Trezza, C., Ford, S. L., Spreen, W., Pan, R. & Piscitelli, S. Formulation and pharmacology of long-acting cabotegravir. Curr. Opin. HIV AIDS 10, 239–245 (2015). source
- Not checked yetcites [17] Williams, P. E., Crauwels, H. M. & Basstanie, E. D. Formulation and pharmacology of long-acting rilpivirine. Curr. Opin. HIV AIDS 10, 233–238 (2015). source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Cabotegravir 16 and rilpivirine 17 were chosen owing to their efficacy at low oral doses and low water solubility.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [16] Trezza, C., Ford, S. L., Spreen, W., Pan, R. & Piscitelli, S. Formulation and pharmacology of long-acting cabotegravir. Curr. Opin. HIV AIDS 10, 239–245 (2015). source
- Not checked yetcites [17] Williams, P. E., Crauwels, H. M. & Basstanie, E. D. Formulation and pharmacology of long-acting rilpivirine. Curr. Opin. HIV AIDS 10, 233–238 (2015). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“When co-administered with exogenous β -lactamase, piperacillin-loaded liposomes provided twofold growth inhibition compared with the free drug co-administered with β -lactamase.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [83] Nacucchio, M. C., Bellora, M. J., Sordelli, D. O. & D’Aquino, M. Enhanced liposome-mediated activity of piperacillin against staphylococci. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 27, 137–139 (1985). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“we have developed an orally administered gastric retentive dosage form that can reduce dosing frequency from daily to weekly 98 .”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [98] Kirtane, A. R. et al. Development of an oral once-weekly drug delivery system for HIV antiretroviral therapy. Nat. Commun. 9, 2 (2018). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In contrast, half-lives of rilpivirine and cabotegravir in tablets have been estimated to be ~1-2 days (refs. 91,92 ).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [91] Verloes, R. et al. Safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of rilpivirine following administration of a long-acting formulation in healthy volunteers. HIV Med. 16, 477–484 (2015). source
- Not checked yetcites [92] Ford, S. L. et al. Lack of pharmacokinetic interaction between rilpivirine and integrase inhibitors dolutegravir and GSK1265744. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 57, 5472–5477 (2013). source
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In Phase IIb clinical trials, the combination of rilpivirine and cabotegravir nanosuspensions enabled disease suppression equivalent to oral tablets of cabotegravir and abcavir-lamivudine 93 .”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [93] Margolis, D. A. et al. Cabotegravir plus rilpivirine, once a day, after induction with cabotegravir plus nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors in antiretroviral-naive adults with HIV-1 infection (LATTE): a randomised, phase 2b, dose-ranging trial. Lancet Infect. Dis. 15, 1145–1155 (2015). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Covalent attachment of heparin and monoclonal antibodies to liposomes has been proven to selectively target infected RBCs in vitro 105,108 .”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [105] Marques, J. et al. Adaptation of targeted nanocarriers to changing requirements in antimalarial drug delivery. Nanomedicine13, 515–525 (2017). source
- Not checked yetcites [108] Urbán, P., Estelrich, J., Cortés, A. & Fernàndez-Busquets, X. A nanovector with complete discrimination for targeted delivery to Plasmodium falciparum-infected versus non-infected red blood cells in vitro. J. Control. Release 151, 202–211 (2011). source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“due to the low uptake of artemisinin in parasite-infected red blood cells (RBCs), these drugs provide only symptomatic relief at low doses 103 .”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [103] Fidock, D. A. Priming the antimalarial pipeline. Nature 465, 297–298 (2010). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“An alternative approach was recently tested in mice and involves injecting a solution of the drug and polymer in an organic solvent subcutaneously 97 . A surgically removable drug depot (~0.75 cm diameter in mice) forms as the organic solvent diffuses out of the injection site.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [97] Kovarova, M. et al. Nanoformulations of rilpivirine for topical pericoital and systemic coitus-independent administration efficiently prevent HIV transmission. PLoS Pathog. 11, e1005075 (2015). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Nanotechnology can also improve the oral bioavailability of poorly water-soluble antimalarials, such artemether and tafenoquine.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The combination therapy exhibited promising antimalarial efficacy in vivo against a resistant parasite strain 113 .”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [113] Kumar, S., Singh, R. K., Sharma, R., Murthy, R. S. R. & Bhardwaj, T. R. Design, synthesis and evaluation of antimalarial potential of polyphosphazene linked combination therapy of primaquine and dihydroartemisinin. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 66, 123–137 (2015). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Efavirenz and lopinavir nanoparticles made using this strategy are currently awaiting clinical testing (NCT02631473).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites NCT02631473
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In rats, the optimized nanoparticle formulation was bioequivalent to lopinavir dissolved in alcohol and propylene glycol 99 .”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [99] Giardiello, M. et al. Accelerated oral nanomedicine discovery from miniaturized screening to clinical production exemplified by paediatric HIV nanotherapies. Nat. Commun. 7, 13184 (2016). source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“unstable in gastric acid”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [120] Jain, R. et al. in Handbook of Nanomaterials for Industrial Applications Ch. 33 (Elsevier, 2018).
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In the lungs and spleen of infected mice, no tubercle bacilli could be detected after five oral doses of drug-loaded solid lipid nanoparticles administered every tenth day, whereas 46 daily doses of oral free drugs were required to achieve the same therapeutic benefit 123 .”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [123] Pandey, R., Sharma, S. & Khuller, G. K. Oral solid lipid nanoparticle-based antitubercular chemotherapy. Tuberculosis 85, 415–420 (2005). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These examples highlight the promise of pulmonary administration of nanocarriers”
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Inhalable nanocarriers of TB drugs have been a major focus of research”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Several oral nanotechnology-based systems have been designed with existing TB drugs and tested in animal models.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Several of the current antibiotics are poorly soluble”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [120] Jain, R. et al. in Handbook of Nanomaterials for Industrial Applications Ch. 33 (Elsevier, 2018).
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“and are at risk of developing drug-resistant strains 4 .”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [4] Sabaté, E. Adherence to Long-Term Therapy: Evidence for Action (WHO, 2003).
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“pulmonary administration of rifampicin-loaded solid lipid nanoparticles in rats enabled delivery to alveolar macrophages 131 .”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [131] Chuan, J. et al. Enhanced rifampicin delivery to alveolar macrophages by solid lipid nanoparticles. J. Nanopart. Res. 15, 1634 (2013). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Polymer-based nanoparticles (PLGA and sodium alginate) have also been developed to improve the oral bioavailability of rifampicin, isoniazid, ethambutol, pyrazinamide and streptomycin 124-127 .”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [124] Ahmad, Z. & Khuller, G. Alginate-based sustained release drug delivery systems for tuberculosis. Expert Opin. Drug Deliv. 5, 1323–1334 (2008). source
- Not checked yetcites [125] Pandey, R. & Khuller, G. K. Nanoparticle-based oral drug delivery system for an injectable antibiotic—streptomycin. Evaluation in a murine tuberculosis model. Chemotherapy 53, 437–441 (2007). source
- Not checked yetcites [126] Pandey, R., Zahoor, A., Sharma, S. & Khuller, G. K. Nanoparticle encapsulated antitubercular drugs as a potential oral drug delivery system against murine tuberculosis. Tuberculosis 83, 373–378 (2003). source
- Not checked yetcites [127] Sharma, A., Pandey, R., Sharma, S. & Khuller, G. K. Chemotherapeutic efficacy of poly (DL-lactide-co-glycolide) nanoparticle encapsulated antitubercular drugs at sub-therapeutic dose against experimental tuberculosis. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 24, 599–604 (2004). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“When guinea pigs were administered an aerosolized formulation of BCG nanomicroparticles, they generated better immune protection and enhanced resistance to TB infection than when they were immunized with the standard parenteral BCG formulation 134 .”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [134] Garcia-Contreras, L. et al. Immunization by a bacterial aerosol. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 4656–4660 (2008). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“unable to penetrate the alveolar macrophages where the bacilli reside 120 .”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [120] Jain, R. et al. in Handbook of Nanomaterials for Industrial Applications Ch. 33 (Elsevier, 2018).
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“WHO guidelines recommend treating drug-susceptible TB for at least 6 months with an oral drug regimen of four antibiotics taken daily 11 .”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [11] Treatment of Tuberculosis: Guidelines 4th edn (WHO, 2010); https://www.who.int/tb/publications/2010/9789241547833/en/
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“bedaquiline was the first new drug approved in more than 40 years (ref. 121 )”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [121] Cohen, J. Approval of novel TB drug celebrated—with restraint. Science 339, 130 (2013). source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Because of the prolonged and frequent dosing, and side effects, patients find it difficult to adhere to these regimens”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [4] Sabaté, E. Adherence to Long-Term Therapy: Evidence for Action (WHO, 2003).
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“M. tuberculosis (Fig. 7) is the most critical pathogen in the global antimicrobial resistance crisis 119 .”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [119] O’Neill, J. Tackling Drug-Resistant Infections Globally: Final Report and Recommendations (2016).
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Solid lipid nanoparticles have been tested in rodents with the goal of improving the bioavailability of rifampicin and the combination of rifampicin, isoniazid and pyrazinamide 122,123 .”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [122] Singh, H., Jindal, S., Singh, M., Sharma, G. & Kaur, I. P. Nano-formulation of rifampicin with enhanced bioavailability: development, characterization and in-vivo safety. Int. J. Pharm. 485, 138–151 (2015). source
- Not checked yetcites [123] Pandey, R., Sharma, S. & Khuller, G. K. Oral solid lipid nanoparticle-based antitubercular chemotherapy. Tuberculosis 85, 415–420 (2005). source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“pulmonary TB is the most common TB form 128 .”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [128] Costa, A. et al. The formulation of nanomedicines for treating tuberculosis. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 102, 102–115 (2016). source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“There is no effective vaccine that comprehensively protects against TB infection.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Pulmonary administration of the common TB antigen 85B conjugated to poly(propylene sulphide) nanoparticles demonstrated improved protection in mice after they were challenged with aerosolized M. tuberculosis (ref. 135 ).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [135] Ballester, M. et al. Nanoparticle conjugation and pulmonary delivery enhance the protective efficacy of Ag85B and CpG against tuberculosis. Vaccine 29, 6959–6966 (2011). source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“A nano-chitosan-based recombinant DNA vaccine elevated the immunologic and protective effects against TB in a mouse model 136”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [136] Feng, G. et al. Enhanced immune response and protective effects of nano-chitosan-based DNA vaccine encoding T cell epitopes of Esat-6 and FL against Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. PLoS ONE 8, e61135 (2013). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“However, one currently approved nano-system (an amphotericin B liposomal formulation) is not cost-effective in developing countries 140 .”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [140] Sundar, S. & Jaya, J. Liposomal amphotericin B and leishmaniasis: dose and response. J. Glob. Infect. Dis. 2, 159–166 (2010). source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“chitosan has a role as a vaccine adjuvant in the prevention of TB 137 .”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [137] Liu, Q. et al. Preparation and evaluation of antigen/N-trimethylaminoethylmethacrylate chitosan conjugates for nasal immunization. Vaccine 32, 2582–2590 (2014). source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Second, the synthesis and storage conditions of some nanoparticles may not be conducive to conditions in low-resource countries 141 .”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [141] Mitchell, S. L. & Carlson, E. E. Tiny things with enormous impact: nanotechnology in the fight against infectious disease. ACS Infect. Dis. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsinfecdis.8b00138 (2018). source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Subtle changes in process or composition can adversely affect the complex composition of nanomedicines 142,143 .”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [142] Desai, N. Challenges in development of nanoparticle-based therapeutics. AAPS J. 14, 282–295 (2012). source
- Not checked yetcites [143] Ioannidis, J. P. A., Kim, B. Y. S. & Trounson, A. How to design preclinical studies in nanomedicine and cell therapy to maximize the prospects of clinical translation. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 2, 797–809 (2018). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Nanomedicines are likely to be three-dimensional constructs of multiple components with preferred spatial arrangements.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“First, reducing the cost will be the major hurdle in developing new drugs and nanotechnology-based systems.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Development of new drugs for global health solutions is expensive.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Reformulating existing drugs in nanocarriers may help to achieve similar targets of enhanced efficacy and safety at a considerably lower cost.”
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: There is a dearth of other new TB drugs in the pipeline.
- Rests on an assumption: Development of new drugs for global health solutions is expensive.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These dimensions facilitate better aerosolization compared with particles with similar dimensions in all axes.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
In the paper
“Third, regional and national differences within and between regulatory authorities, especially when running multi-centric international trials, will be a challenge during the clinical trial stage 144 .”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [144] Satalkar, P., Elger, B. S., Hunziker, P. & Shaw, D. Challenges of clinical translation in nanomedicine: a qualitative study. Nanomedicine 12, 893–900 (2016). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- It may state two separate claims as one. 67
- Probably not a substantial claim. 24
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“The results demonstrated that while free imipenem had negligible effect when co-administered with the enzyme, the nanoparticles had comparable bactericidal effects regardless of whether carbapenemase had been co-administered.”
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [82] Shaaban, M. I., Shaker, M. A. & Mady, F. M. Imipenem/cilastatin encapsulated polymeric nanoparticles for destroying carbapenem-resistant bacterial isolates. J. Nanobiotechnol. 15, 29 (2017). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
In Results and discussion, ‘Protection from carbapenemases’ (page not provided), the paper says free imipenem lost all activity after enzyme treatment, while both nanoparticle formulations retained inhibitory effects. It does not establish that the nanoparticles killed bacteria or that their effects were comparable in magnitude with and without enzyme treatment; the assay measured growth-inhibition zones. (LLM, conf=0.84)
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
In the paper
“Mortality rates are highest in developing countries, where resources such as vaccines and anti-infectives may be limited (Fig. 1b) 1 .”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [1] Roth, G. A. et al. Global, regional, and national age-sex-specific mortality for 282 causes of death in 195 countries and territories, 1980–2017: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease Study 2017. Lancet 392, 1736–1788 (2018). source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Temporal trends in mortality show that although the overall number of deaths is declining, the gap between deaths in high socio-demographic index (SDI) countries and low SDI countries remains substantial (Fig. 1c) 1 .”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [1] Roth, G. A. et al. Global, regional, and national age-sex-specific mortality for 282 causes of death in 195 countries and territories, 1980–2017: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease Study 2017. Lancet 392, 1736–1788 (2018). source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In some cases, a lack of drug efficacy can be attributed to pathogen resistance, which then requires a more expensive drug regimen for cure 3 .”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [3] Munita, J. M. & Arias, C. A. Mechanisms of antibiotic resistance. Microbiol. Spectrum 4, VMBF-0016-2015. (2016). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Nanotechnology has the potential to transform both detection and treatment of a wide range of diseases.”
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“Poor patient adherence to therapies and the need for sustained patient monitoring are major obstacles to effective treatment 4 .”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [4] Sabaté, E. Adherence to Long-Term Therapy: Evidence for Action (WHO, 2003).
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“High mortality rates are associated with lower respiratory infections, diarrhoea, tuberculosis (TB), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection and malaria (Fig. 1a) 1 .”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [1] Roth, G. A. et al. Global, regional, and national age-sex-specific mortality for 282 causes of death in 195 countries and territories, 1980–2017: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease Study 2017. Lancet 392, 1736–1788 (2018). source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Infectious diseases are a major driver of morbidity and mortality globally.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [1] Roth, G. A. et al. Global, regional, and national age-sex-specific mortality for 282 causes of death in 195 countries and territories, 1980–2017: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease Study 2017. Lancet 392, 1736–1788 (2018). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Poor procurement practices, the inability to pay for drugs and poor stability of drug products at high temperature and humidity prevent access to effective treatments 5 .”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [5] Pheage, T. Dying from Lack of Medicines (United Nations, 2016); https://www.un.org/africarenewal/magazine/december-2016-march-2017/dying-lack-medicines source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Nanosystems have been the subject of intensive research over the past few decades, resulting in Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved chemotherapeutics, anaesthetics, imaging agents, nutritional supplements and others 6 .”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [6] Anselmo, A. C. & Mitragotri, S. Nanoparticles in the clinic. Bioeng. Transl. Med. 1, 10–29 (2016). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“The highest tissue uptake was achieved with PEG-coated nanoparticles; however, tissue uptake was limited to the lower reproductive tract.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [23] Cu, Y., Booth, C. J. & Saltzman, W. M. In vivo distribution of surface-modified PLGA nanoparticles following intravaginal delivery. J. Control. Release 156, 258–264 (2011). source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A drawback of some polymeric and liposomal formulations is that they require large quantities of excipients to control drug release. This increases the size of the injection and limits the amount of drug that can be administered.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Cunha-Reis et al. demonstrated that nanoparticles loaded with an anti-HIV drug (efavirenz) and embedded in a water-soluble film showed lower leakage and enabled higher tissue concentrations than nanoparticle dispersions 25 .”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [25] Cunha-Reis, C. et al. Nanoparticles-in-film for the combined vaginal delivery of anti-HIV microbicide drugs. J. Control. Release 243, 43–53 (2016). source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In a rat model, intravenously administered Mikasomes distributed to several tissues, where they released drug gradually resulting in an eightfold increase in drug half-life.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [14] Fielding, R. M., Lewis, R. O. & Moon-McDermott, L. Altered tissue distribution and elimination of amikacin encapsulated in unilamellar, low-clearance liposomes (MiKasome). Pharm. Res. 15, 1775–1781 (1998). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Acyclovir monophosphate nanoparticles protected ~54% of the mice that were infected with HSV-2 30 min post-treatment. In contrast, the soluble drug protected only 16% of the mice from viral challenge.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [26] Ensign, L. M. et al. Mucus-penetrating nanoparticles for vaginal drug delivery protect against herpes simplex virus. Sci. Transl. Med. 4, 138ra79 (2012). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Nanocarriers can be engineered to release drugs in the presence of certain triggers and provide temporal control on drug exposure.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Encapsulation of drugs in nanocarriers allows for sustained drug delivery, thereby reducing dosing frequency.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Drug release occurs via bulk degradation of the polymer and drug diffusion 12 and can be modified by altering the hydrophobicity of the monomer, polymer chain length and particle size 13 .”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [12] Langer, R. Drug delivery and targeting. Nature 392, 5–10 (1998).
- Not checked yetcites [13] Makadia, H. K. & Siegel, S. J. Poly lactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA) as biodegradable controlled drug delivery carrier. Polymers 3, 1377–1397 (2011). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Nanocarriers may enhance drug uptake in cells and improve efficacy against intracellular pathogens.”
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“An important consideration with sustained release systems is the potential for prolonged exposure to sub-therapeutic concentrations, which may lead to drug resistance 19 .”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [19] Wistrand-Yuen, E. et al. Evolution of high-level resistance during low-level antibiotic exposure. Nat. Commun. 9, 1599 (2018). source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Compared with healthy mice, the transfection efficiency of the polyplex in mice treated with lipopolysaccharide was reduced by about tenfold. Impressively, pre-treatment with N -acetyl cysteine restored transfection efficiency in the inflammation model.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [36] Suk, J. S. et al. N-acetylcysteine enhances cystic fibrosis sputum penetration and airway gene transfer by highly compacted DNA nanoparticles. Mol. Ther. 19, 1981–1989 (2011). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The scaffold did enable the slow release of silver; however, toxicity to host cells was not reduced 40 .”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [40] Mohiti-Asli, M., Pourdeyhimi, B. & Loboa, E. G. Skin tissue engineering for the infected wound site: biodegradable PLA nanofibers and a novel approach for silver ion release evaluated in a 3D coculture system of keratinocytes and Staphylococcus aureus. Tissue Eng. Pt C 20, 790–797 (2014). source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These results suggest that the presence of biofilms plays a role in chronic infections and non-healing wounds, and strategies that overcome biofilm resistance may help treat these infections.”
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Interestingly, PLGA nanoparticles containing cationic spermidine have been used for siRNA-based knockdown of the same target, and have shown better protection than lipofectamine lipoplexes 28 .”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [28] Steinbach, J. M., Weller, C. E., Booth, C. J. & Saltzman, W. M. Polymer nanoparticles encapsulating siRNA for treatment of HSV-2 genital infection. J. Control. Release 162, 102–110 (2012). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The authors found that the PLGA nanoparticles had a similar knockdown efficiency to lipoplexes, but elicited lower inflammation (as observed by measuring neutrophil invasion using immunohistochemistry).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [28] Steinbach, J. M., Weller, C. E., Booth, C. J. & Saltzman, W. M. Polymer nanoparticles encapsulating siRNA for treatment of HSV-2 genital infection. J. Control. Release 162, 102–110 (2012). source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“aminoglycosides largely accumulate in the lysosomes and are likely to be ineffective against cytosolic pathogens 64 .”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [64] Tulkens, P. & Trouet, A. The uptake and intracellular accumulation of aminoglycoside antibiotics in lysosomes of cultured rat fibroblasts. Biochem. Pharmacol. 27, 415–424 (1978). source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In rats, 60% of the drug dose was found in the RES organs 8 h after treatment with nanoparticles. In contrast, after treatment with the soluble drug alone, only 12% of the drug was recovered in the RES tissues.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [44] Löbenberg, R., Araujo, L., von Briesen, H., Rodgers, E. & Kreuter, J. Body distribution of azidothymidine bound to hexyl-cyanoacrylate nanoparticles after i.v. injection to rats. J. Control. Release 50, 21–30 (1998). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Encapsulation in nanocarriers offers opportunities to increase cell uptake of anti-infectives and alter their intracellular disposition (Fig. 4b).”
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Nanoparticle-based treatment enabled a tenfold dose reduction in vivo.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [55] Arias, J. L. et al. Nanobody conjugated PLGA nanoparticles for active targeting of African trypanosomiasis. J. Control. Release 197, 190–198 (2015). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The quote only partly states this claim.
In the paper
“Resistance results from the secretion of drug-inactivating enzymes and/or the pathogens switching to a state of reduced metabolic activity, forming biofilms, adopting an intracellular life cycle or being obligate intracellular pathogens 3 .”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [3] Munita, J. M. & Arias, C. A. Mechanisms of antibiotic resistance. Microbiol. Spectrum 4, VMBF-0016-2015. (2016). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“InvA497-funtionalized gentamycin-loaded liposomes caused a 30% reduction in bacterial load in an in vitro model of Y. pseudotuberculosis infection, whereas albumin-functionalized liposomes had no effect 68 .”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [68] Labouta, H. I. et al. Bacteriomimetic invasin-functionalized nanocarriers for intracellular delivery. J. Control. Release 220, 414–424 (2015). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Animals treated with mRNA nanoparticles produced antibody-based and CD8 + T-cell immune responses, and were completely protected from lethal challenges of Ebola virus, H1N1 influenza and Toxoplasma gondii .”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [75] Chahal, J. S. et al. Dendrimer-RNA nanoparticles generate protective immunity against lethal Ebola, H1N1 influenza, and Toxoplasma gondii challenges with a single dose. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, E4133–E4142 (2016). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Nanoparticles formed from this conjugate were rapidly taken up by cells and released drug in the endolysosomes. This resulted in improved activity over the free drug.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [67] Sémiramoth, N. et al. Self-assembled squalenoylated penicillin bioconjugates: an original approach for the treatment of intracellular infections. ACS Nano 6, 3820–3831 (2012). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A key feature of nanocarriers is that they aid in the transport of mRNA across the cell membrane, enable endolysosomal escape and release the nucleic acid in the cytoplasm 74 .”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [74] Kowalski, P. S., Rudra, A., Miao, L. & Anderson, D. G. Delivering the messenger: advances in technologies for therapeutic mRNA Delivery. Mol. Ther. 27, 710–728 (2019). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Initial results with lipid-nanoparticle-formulated mRNA vaccines against H10N8 and H7N9 influenza viruses and SARS-CoV-2 indicate that these vaccines are well tolerated and that they produce a robust humoral response 76,77 .”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [76] Jackson, L. A. et al. An mRNA vccine against SARS-CoV-2—preliminary report. N. Engl. J. Med. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2022483 (2020). source
- Not checked yetcites [77] Feldman, R. A. et al. mRNA vaccines against H10N8 and H7N9 influenza viruses of pandemic potential are immunogenic and well tolerated in healthy adults in phase 1 randomized clinical trials. Vaccine 37, 3326–3334 (2019). source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“encapsulation of RNA in lipid carriers 72 , and their utility in vaccination 73 , was demonstrated.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [72] Ostro, M. J., Giacomoni, D. & Dray, S. Incorporation of high molecular weight RNA into large artificial lipid vesicles. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 76, 836–842 (1977). source
- Not checked yetcites [73] Martinon, F. et al. Induction of virus-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes in vivo by liposome-entrapped mRNA. Eur. J. Immunol. 23, 1719–1722 (1993). source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“This group has shown that surface functionalization with InvA497 is beneficial for enhancing both in vitro cell uptake and antimicrobial efficacy of polymeric nanoparticles 69 .”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [69] Castoldi, A. et al. Aspherical and spherical InvA497-functionalized nanocarriers for intracellular delivery of anti-infective agents. Pharm. Res. 36, 22 (2019). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Nanoparticles can prevent, disrupt and inhibit or disperse bacteria from biofilm infections 30 (Fig. 4c).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [30] Han, C. et al. Recent developments in the use of nanoparticles for treatment of biofilms. Nanotechnol. Rev. 6, 383–404 (2017). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: By forming a diffusion barrier, the extracellular polymeric matrix in the biofilm protects bacteria from high antibiotic concentrations, often leading to chronic infections.
In the paper
“In vitro studies revealed that antibiotics (azithromycin and rifampicin) were effective if applied immediately after infection, but not if applied after 24 or 48 h. However, encapsulation in nanoparticles partly restored their activities even when applied at 24 and 48 h after infection.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [80] Toti, U. S. et al. Targeted delivery of antibiotics to intracellular chlamydial infections using PLGA nanoparticles. Biomaterials 32, 6606–6613 (2011). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“nanotechnology has been most actively studied in the clinic and in large animals for the treatment and prevention of HIV infection (Table 1). In contrast, for malaria and TB, nanotechnology has been pursued with less gusto. For these IDs, work has mainly been limited to preclinical trials in rodents.”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Long-acting injectable nanoparticles reduce dosing frequency, which stands to improve patient adherence.”
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“These enzymes, such as β -lactamases and aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes, are readily transferred through horizontal gene transfer and have been implicated in the pattern of increasing drug resistance 3 .”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [3] Munita, J. M. & Arias, C. A. Mechanisms of antibiotic resistance. Microbiol. Spectrum 4, VMBF-0016-2015. (2016). source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Nanoparticles have been used to protect antibiotic agents from enzymatic degradation and resensitize resistant bacteria to their bactericidal effects (Fig. 4d).”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Long-acting injectable antiretrovirals are the most clinically advanced nanotechnology in HIV treatment.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Ten treatments at these elevated doses produced complete survival in the drug-resistant model. However, only two treatments with substantially lower doses of the liposomal combination also produced 100% survival.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [84] Schiffelers, R. M. et al. In vivo synergistic interaction of liposome-coencapsulated gentamicin and ceftazidime. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 298, 369–375 (2001).
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In the drug-sensitive model, ten doses of the soluble drug combination treatment resulted in complete survival. Impressively, only a single dose of the liposomal combination produced the same effect.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [84] Schiffelers, R. M. et al. In vivo synergistic interaction of liposome-coencapsulated gentamicin and ceftazidime. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 298, 369–375 (2001).
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Both nanosuspensions were safe and devoid of major adverse effects 88 .”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [88] Swindells, S., Flexner, C., Fletcher, C. V. & Jacobson, J. M. The critical need for alternative antiretroviral formulations, and obstacles to their development. J. Infect. Dis. 204, 669–674 (2011). source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Long-chain-triglyceride-based self-microemulsifying systems containing β -artemether were demonstrated to be safe and have a notable improvement in the antimalarial activity in vivo compared with Larither.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [111] Mandawgade, S. D., Sharma, S., Pathak, S. & Patravale, V. B. Development of SMEDDS using natural lipophile: application to β-artemether delivery. Int. J. Pharm. 362, 179–183 (2008). source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Nanoformulation of multiple combined drugs is an efficient method for designing innovative therapeutics and can prevent resistance of the malaria parasite.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Estimated half-lives of rilpivirine and cabotegravir in nanosuspensions were 44-61 days (ref. 91 ) and 25-54 days (ref. 91 ), respectively, enabling administration every 1-3 months.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [91] Verloes, R. et al. Safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of rilpivirine following administration of a long-acting formulation in healthy volunteers. HIV Med. 16, 477–484 (2015). source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Oral antiretroviral nanoparticles have been developed for paediatric use with the intent to replace tablets (which are difficult to swallow) and alcohol-containing solutions (which contain harmful excipients). These nanoparticles are produced by a novel emulsion template freeze-drying approach and have been loaded with lopinavir and efavirenz 99 .”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [99] Giardiello, M. et al. Accelerated oral nanomedicine discovery from miniaturized screening to clinical production exemplified by paediatric HIV nanotherapies. Nat. Commun. 7, 13184 (2016). source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“researchers showed that the systems resulted in greater clearance of parasites from infected mice and had a clear benefit over individual drug-loaded carriers in terms of survival period and parasitaemia progression 114 .”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [114] Parashar, D., Aditya, N. P. & Murthy, R. S. R. Development of artemether and lumefantrine co-loaded nanostructured lipid carriers: physicochemical characterization and in vivo antimalarial activity. Drug Deliv. 23, 123–129 (2016). source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Malaria is mainly treated using chemotherapy, with artemisinin-based combination therapy being integral to curing the disease 102 .”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [102] World Malaria Report 2017 (WHO, 2017); http://www.who.int/malaria/publications/world-malaria-report-2017/report/en/
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These approaches, using oily vehicles to enhance solubilization in the gastrointestinal tract, improve drug bioavailability and patient adherence.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“These functionalized liposomes preferentially adhere to surface proteins decorating infected RBCs and reduce the overall parasitaemia.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [105] Marques, J. et al. Adaptation of targeted nanocarriers to changing requirements in antimalarial drug delivery. Nanomedicine13, 515–525 (2017). source
- Not checked yetcites [108] Urbán, P., Estelrich, J., Cortés, A. & Fernàndez-Busquets, X. A nanovector with complete discrimination for targeted delivery to Plasmodium falciparum-infected versus non-infected red blood cells in vitro. J. Control. Release 151, 202–211 (2011). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Killing parasites in the RBCs requires prolonged treatment with high doses, which results in toxicities, potential for missed doses and development of resistance 104 .”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [104] Baird, J. K. Effectiveness of antimalarial drugs. N. Engl. J. Med. 352, 1565–1577 (2005). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Given that blood stage parasites are the main therapeutic target, researchers are developing various approaches to target antimalarials to infected RBCs 105-107 , thereby maximizing their therapeutic window.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [105] Marques, J. et al. Adaptation of targeted nanocarriers to changing requirements in antimalarial drug delivery. Nanomedicine13, 515–525 (2017). source
- Not checked yetcites [106] Moles, E. et al. ImmunoPEGliposomes for the targeted delivery of novel lipophilic drugs to red blood cells in a falciparum malaria murine model. Biomaterials 145, 178–191 (2017). source
- Not checked yetcites [107] Urban, P. & Fernandez-Busquets, X. Nanomedicine against malaria. Curr. Med. Chem. 21, 605–629 (2014). source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Nanoencapsulation enhanced circulation times of the antiretrovirals and increased their uptake into the mononuclear cells in peripheral blood and lymph nodes of macaques.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [95] Freeling, J. P., Koehn, J., Shu, C., Sun, J. & Ho, R. J. Y. Anti-HIV drug-combination nanoparticles enhance plasma drug exposure duration as well as triple-drug combination levels in cells within lymph nodes and blood in primates. AIDS Res. Hum. Retrov. 31, 107–114 (2015). source
- Not checked yetcites [96] Freeling, J. P., Koehn, J., Shu, C., Sun, J. & Ho, R. J. Y. Long-acting three-drug combination anti-HIV nanoparticles enhance drug exposure in primate plasma and cells within lymph nodes and blood. AIDS 28, 2625–2627 (2014). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: HIV persists in macrophages for prolonged durations, even in patients receiving antiretroviral therapy.
In the paper
“Although liposomal drug delivery is an established platform with proven biocompatibility, the oral route of administration is typically not used due to instability in the gastrointestinal tract 109 .”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [109] Allen, T. M. & Cullis, P. R. Liposomal drug delivery systems: from concept to clinical applications. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 65, 36–48 (2013). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In rhesus macaques, prodrug nanoparticles maintained therapeutic concentrations of dolutegravir for ~40 days and extended the half-life of dolutegravir to ~19.5 days.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [18] Mcmillan, J. et al. Pharmacokinetics of a long-acting nanoformulated dolutegravir prodrug in rhesus macaques. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 62, e01316-17 (2017). source
- Not checked yetcites [94] Sillman, B. et al. Creation of a long-acting nanoformulated dolutegravir. Nat. Commun. 9, 443 (2018). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“NanoAbsorb is a solid microemulsion pre-concentrate formulation that can safely deliver the widely used drug artemether with higher antimalarial efficacy in vivo than the marketed formulation Larither 110 .”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [110] Joshi, M., Pathak, S., Sharma, S. & Patravale, V. Solid microemulsion preconcentrate (NanOsorb) of artemether for effective treatment of malaria. Int. J. Pharm. 362, 172–178 (2008). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“There is only one malaria vaccine candidate that has received a positive regulatory assessment: RTS,S/AS01 (RTS,S) (Mosquirix), which is an injectable vaccine that provides partial protection against malaria in young children 115 .”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [115] RTS,S Clinical Trials Partnership. A phase 3 trial of RTS,S/AS01 malaria vaccine in African infants. N. Engl. J. Med. 367, 2284–2295 (2012). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Therefore, researchers are attempting to improve the existing BCG vaccine and derive new vaccines to prevent TB 133 .”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [133] Kaufmann, S. H. E., Weiner, J. & von Reyn, C. F. Novel approaches to tuberculosis vaccine development. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 56, 263–267 (2017). source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In July 2015, European regulators approved the use of the vaccine, although it is at most 50% effective 115 .”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [115] RTS,S Clinical Trials Partnership. A phase 3 trial of RTS,S/AS01 malaria vaccine in African infants. N. Engl. J. Med. 367, 2284–2295 (2012). source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Researchers have developed nebulized solid lipid particles 129 and sodium alginate nanoparticles 130 incorporating rifampicin, isoniazid and pyrazinamide to improve targeted bioavailability in the lungs and reduce hepatotoxicity.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [129] Pandey, R. & Khuller, G. K. Solid lipid particle-based inhalable sustained drug delivery system against experimental tuberculosis. Tuberculosis 85, 227–234 (2005). source
- Not checked yetcites [130] Zahoor, A., Sharma, S. & Khuller, G. K. Inhalable alginate nanoparticles as antitubercular drug carriers against experimental tuberculosis. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 26, 298–303 (2005). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG), which was introduced in 1921, is the sole approved TB vaccine, but it offers only limited protection 132 .”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [132] Hawn, T. R. et al. Tuberculosis vaccines and prevention of infection. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 78, 650–671 (2014). source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The antigen is formulated as virus-like particle and combined with a liposomal adjuvant system.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [115] RTS,S Clinical Trials Partnership. A phase 3 trial of RTS,S/AS01 malaria vaccine in African infants. N. Engl. J. Med. 367, 2284–2295 (2012). source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Unless radical action is taken, drug-resistant strains of M. tuberculosis will account for 25% of antimicrobial resistance-related deaths and cost the global economy US$16.7 trillion by the year 2050 119 .”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [119] O’Neill, J. Tackling Drug-Resistant Infections Globally: Final Report and Recommendations (2016).
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Given that most people with TB infection do not have symptoms, it can be challenging for them to complete their regimens 139 .”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [139] Van Ginderdeuren, E., Bassett, J., Hanrahan, C., Mutunga, L. & Van Rie, A. Health system barriers to implementation of TB preventive strategies in South African primary care facilities. PLoS ONE 14, e0212035 (2019). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Innovative and cost-effective nanotechnologies that take into consideration the challenges that are encountered low SDI countries are most likely to benefit patients.”
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In 2006, the International Centre for Technology Assessment and other consumer groups filed a legal petition against the FDA for perceived lack of initiative in regulating nanomaterial-containing products under their jurisdiction.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [145] Nanotechnology: A Report of the US Food and Drug Administration Nanotechnology Task Force (USFDA, 2007).
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“TB is caused by the inhalation of droplet nuclei containing M. tuberculosis that enter the respiratory tract and infect the alveoli of the lungs.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [149] Pai, M. et al. Tuberculosis. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 2, 16076 (2016). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“It is also recommended that people who are infected with TB but do not have active disease (latent TB) receive treatment to eradicate the mycobacteria and prevent progress to active disease 138 .”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [138] Latent Tuberculosis Infection: Updated and Consolidated Guidelines for Programmtic Management (WHO, 2018).
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Nonetheless, the rapid translation of nanotechnologies from the bench to the people, and the impact that these systems have had on the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic provide great promise.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The examples above highlight many promising therapeutic strategies for developing nanomedicines to treat and prevent IDs.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Nanotechnology is a multi-disciplinary field that also requires intellectual property and commercialization strategies to grow 146 .”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [146] Bhatia, P., Vasaikar, S. & Wali, A. A landscape of nanomedicine innovations in India. Nanotechnol. Rev. 7, 131–148 (2018). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, to have the maximum impact, nanotechnology solutions will need to overcome several financial, manufacturing and regulatory challenges.”
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Simplifying the use of medicines and making drugs safer and more efficacious can improve patients' quality of life and reduce disease burden.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The FDA created a Nano Task Force in response 145 .”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [145] Nanotechnology: A Report of the US Food and Drug Administration Nanotechnology Task Force (USFDA, 2007).
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Nanotechnology can potentially simplify dosing and minimize adverse events in this population, thereby greatly contributing to the elimination of TB.”
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Preventative TB regimens can last for 9 months and require multidrug therapy.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This example suggests that similar feats may be possible in treating other infectious diseases as well.”
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper relies on this without support.
Nanocarriers are predominantly cleared by macrophages.
“As nanocarriers are predominantly cleared by these cells (Fig. 3a), they have been widely used for targeting drugs to macrophages.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Expression of certain targets/receptors in diseased areas may be elevated.
“The expression of certain targets/receptors in diseased areas may be elevated.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Drug molecules released while nanocarriers are in circulation are subject to non-selective distribution.
“Drug molecules released while nanocarriers are in circulation are subject to non-selective distribution.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Nanotechnology-based approaches have been the topic of intensive preclinical evaluation to improve the therapeutic index of ID drugs and simplify their use.
“Nanotechnology-based approaches have been the topic of intensive preclinical evaluation to improve the therapeutic index of ID drugs and simplify their use.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Nanoencapsulation may enhance drug accumulation at sites of infection.
“Although nanoencapsulation may enhance drug accumulation at sites of infection”
The paper relies on this without support.
Drug accumulation at sites of infection is increased in rodent models, but a substantial fraction of the drug is at off-target locations.
“Although drug accumulation at sites of infection is increased in rodent models, a substantial fraction of the drug is at off-target locations.”
The paper relies on this without support.
For triggered-release systems, some drug leakage is generally observed even in the absence of triggers.
“For triggered-release systems, some drug leakage is generally observed even in the absence of triggers.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The intravenous route of administration may not be practical in resource-limited settings or in mass drug administration campaigns.
“the intravenous route of administration may not be practical in resource-limited settings or in mass drug administration campaigns.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Both drug molecules and pathogens are unevenly distributed within host cells, and in the absence of colocalization, efficacy is compromised.
“both drug molecules and pathogens are unevenly distributed within host cells, and in the absence of colocalization, efficacy is compromised”
The paper relies on this without support.
By forming a diffusion barrier, the extracellular polymeric matrix in the biofilm protects bacteria from high antibiotic concentrations, often leading to chronic infections.
“By forming a diffusion barrier, the extracellular polymeric matrix in the biofilm protects bacteria from high antibiotic concentrations, often leading to chronic infections.”
The paper relies on this without support.
HIV persists in macrophages for prolonged durations, even in patients receiving antiretroviral therapy.
“HIV persists in macrophages for prolonged durations, even in patients receiving antiretroviral therapy.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Patients treated with injectable nanosuspensions are exposed to the drug for at least a month, and there is no mechanism to withdraw exposure in cases of adverse reactions.
“Patients treated with injectable nanosuspensions are exposed to the drug for at least a month, and there is no mechanism to withdraw exposure in cases of adverse reactions.”
The paper relies on this without support.
This problem has been addressed in clinical trials by providing patients with a lead-in period of oral drug therapy before the injection.
“This problem has been addressed in clinical trials by providing patients with a lead-in period of oral drug therapy before the injection.”
The paper relies on this without support.
In most clinical trials, the nanosuspensions have been administered by medical practitioners, and it is likely that patients will need to visit their caregiver for each injection.
“in most clinical trials, the nanosuspensions have been administered by medical practitioners, and it is likely that patients will need to visit their caregiver for each injection.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Artemether and lumefantrine are well accepted as a combination therapy for treating uncomplicated malaria, yet the current marketed formulation degrades in the gastrointestinal tract, leading to unpredictable pharmacokinetics.
“Artemether and lumefantrine are well accepted as a combination therapy for treating uncomplicated malaria, yet the current marketed formulation degrades in the gastrointestinal tract, leading to unpredictable pharmacokinetics.”
The paper relies on this without support.
There is a dearth of other new TB drugs in the pipeline.
“and the dearth of others in the pipeline”
The paper relies on this without support.
Preventative TB regimens can last for 9 months and require multidrug therapy.
“These preventative regimens can last for 9 months and require multidrug therapy.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Development of new drugs for global health solutions is expensive.
“For global health solutions, development of new drugs is expensive.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Excipients used in nanosystems, such as lyoprotectants, can increase the cost of many treatments.
“Excipients used in nanosystems, such as lyoprotectants, can increase the cost of many treatments.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Nanomedicines are likely to be three-dimensional constructs of multiple components with preferred spatial arrangements.
“Nanomedicines are likely to be three-dimensional constructs of multiple components with preferred spatial arrangements.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Each pathogen poses a unique set of challenges, including high lethality, rapid mutations, immune evasion, new strains and variants252–258.”
From mRNA vaccines for infectious diseases: principles, delivery and clinical translation (2021) · cites this paper as [258]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Review Article | FOCUS Review Article | FOCUS · p. 8
“d , Nanocarriers can protect drug-degrading enzymes present in the biofilm.”
§ Review Article | FOCUS Review Article | FOCUS · p. 8
“Nanoparticles have been used to protect antibiotic agents from enzymatic degradation and resensitize resistant bacteria to their bactericidal effects (Fig. 4d).”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Nanotechnology in treating IDs · p. 4
“Another biofilm-disrupting approach involves the use of nitrous oxide-releasing polymeric nanoparticles.”
§ Nanotechnology in treating IDs · p. 4
“To enable sustained release of nitric oxide, which has a short half-life, Duong et al. 35 conjugated nitric oxide with star-shaped polymers.”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Advanced preclinical and clinical nanotechnologies · p. 9
“In Phase IIb clinical trials, the combination of rilpivirine and cabotegravir nanosuspensions enabled disease suppression equivalent to oral tablets of cabotegravir and abcavir-lamivudine 93 .”
§ Review Article | FOCUS Review Article | FOCUS · p. 15
“93. Margolis, D. A. et al. Cabotegravir plus rilpivirine, once a day, after induction with cabotegravir plus nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors in antiretroviral-naive adults with HIV-1 infection (LATTE): a randomised, phase 2b, dose-ranging trial.”
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Feng, G., Jiang, Q., Xia, M., Lu, Y., Qiu, W., Zhao, D., Lu, L., Peng, G., & Wang, Y. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0061135 · Cited by 108
RetractedRoth, G. A., Abate, D., Abate, K. H., Abay, S. M., Abbafati, C., Abbasi, N., Abbastabar, H., Abd-Allah, F., Abdela, J., Abdelalim, A., et al. (2018) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(18)32203-7 · Cited by 8,600
Liposomal drug delivery systems: From concept to clinical applications
Allen, T. M., & Cullis, P. R. (2013) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2012.09.037 · Cited by 4,839
Poly Lactic-co-Glycolic Acid (PLGA) as Biodegradable Controlled Drug Delivery Carrier
Makadia, H. K., & Siegel, S. J. (2011) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym3031377 · Cited by 4,816
mRNA vaccines — a new era in vaccinology
Pardi, N., Hogan, M. J., Porter, F. W., & Weissman, D. (2018) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd.2017.243 · Cited by 4,667
An mRNA Vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 — Preliminary Report
Jackson, L. A., Anderson, E. J., Rouphael, N. G., Roberts, P. C., Makhene, M., Coler, R. N., McCullough, M. P., Chappell, J. D., Denison, M. R., Stevens, L. J., et al. (2020) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2022483 · Cited by 3,237
Human skin wounds: A major and snowballing threat to public health and the economy
Sen, C. K., Gordillo, G. M., Roy, S., Kirsner, R., Lambert, L., Hunt, T. K., Gottrup, F., Gurtner, G. C., & Longaker, M. T. (2009) · Wound Repair and Regeneration · doi:10.1111/j.1524-475x.2009.00543.x · Cited by 2,965
Biodegradable Long-Circulating Polymeric Nanospheres
Gref, R., Minamitake, Y., Peracchia, M. T., Trubetskoy, V. S., Torchilin, V. P., & Langer, R. (1994) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.8128245 · Cited by 2,951
Self-citation(2016) · Cited by 2,888
Mechanisms of Antibiotic Resistance
Munita, J. M., & Arias, C. A. (2016) · Microbiology Spectrum · doi:10.1128/microbiolspec.vmbf-0016-2015 · Cited by 2,782
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Jain, R. et al. in Handbook of Nanomaterials for Industrial Applications Ch. 33 (Elsevier, 2018).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
mRNA vaccines for infectious diseases: principles, delivery and clinical translation
Chaudhary, N., Weissman, D., & Whitehead, K. A. (2021) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/s41573-021-00283-5 · Cited by 1,555
Huang, Y., Guo, X., Wu, Y., Chen, X., Feng, L., Xie, N., & Shen, G. (2024) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-024-01745-z · Cited by 537
mRNA-based cancer therapeutics
Liu, C., Shi, Q., Huang, X., Koo, S., Kong, N., & Tao, W. (2023) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/s41568-023-00586-2 · Cited by 500
Organic photosensitizers for antimicrobial phototherapy
Nghĩa, N. V., Zhao, Z., Tang, B. Z., & Yoon, J. (2022) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d1cs00647a · Cited by 464
Nanotechnology as a Novel Approach in Combating Microbes Providing an Alternative to Antibiotics
Mubeen, B., Ansar, A. N., Rasool, R., Ullah, I., Imam, S. S., Alshehri, S., Ghoneim, M. M., Alzarea, S. I., Nadeem, M. S., & Kazmi, I. A. (2021) · Antibiotics · doi:10.3390/antibiotics10121473 · Cited by 257
Metadata
- Authors
- Kirtane, A. R., Verma, M., Karandikar, P., Furin, J., Langer, R., & Traverso, G.
- Affiliations
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research At MIT (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature Nanotechnology
- Published
- 2021-03-22
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 369-384
- ISSN
- 1748-3387 (ISSN-L)
- 1748-3395
- OpenAlex
- W3139513515
- Cited by
- 520
- References
- 141
- Citations by year
- 2026: 51 · 2025: 100 · 2024: 112 · 2023: 145 · 2022: 85 · 2021: 26
- FWCI
- 6.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Nature Nanotechnology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health (EB000244)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advanced Drug Delivery Systems
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Pharmacology and Nanomedicine Research
- Keywords
- nanotechnology, infectious diseases, malaria, tuberculosis, HIV, nanocarriers, drug delivery, bioavailability, drug toxicity, patient adherence, nanovaccines, global health
- MeSH terms
- Communicable Diseases, Drug Carriers, Humans, Drug Delivery Systems, Nanotechnology, Nanoparticles
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review