The DOI matches its Crossref record; 157 of the 161 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 233 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation
Open accessAbstract
This review takes a historical perspective on concepts in the psychology of motivation and emotion, and surveys recent developments, debates and applications. Old debates over emotion have recently risen again. For example, are emotions necessarily subjective feelings? Do animals have emotions? I review evidence that emotions exist as core psychological processes, which have objectively detectable features, and which can occur either with subjective feelings or without them. Evidence is offered also that studies of emotion in animals can give new insights into human emotions. Beyond emotion, motivation concepts have changed over decades too, and debates still continue. Motivation was once thought in terms of aversive drives, and reward was thought of in terms of drive reduction. Motivation-as-drive concepts were largely replaced by motivation-as-incentive concepts, yet aversive drive concepts still occasionally surface in reward neuroscience today. Among incentive concepts, incentive salience is a core motivation process, mediated by brain mesocorticolimbic systems (dopamine-related systems) and sometimes called 'wanting' (in quotation marks), to distinguish it from cognitive forms of desire (wanting without quotation marks). Incentive salience as 'wanting' is separable also from pleasure 'liking' for the same reward, which has important implications for several human clinical disorders. Ordinarily, incentive salience adds motivational urgency to cognitive desires, but 'wanting' and cognitive desires can dissociate in some conditions. Excessive incentive salience can cause addictions, in which excessive 'wanting' can diverge from cognitive desires. Conversely, lack of incentive salience may cause motivational forms of anhedonia in depression or schizophrenia, whereas a negatively-valenced form of 'fearful salience' may contribute to paranoia. Finally, negative 'fear' and 'disgust' have both partial overlap but also important neural differences.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This review argues that emotion and motivation include objective core processes that can occur with or without subjective feelings, and it traces the historical shift from drive-reduction accounts to incentive motivation. It emphasizes the distinction between ‘wanting’ and ‘liking,’ mesocorticolimbic dopamine in incentive salience, and clinical implications for addiction, anhedonia, paranoia, and fear/disgust.
Key findings
- Emotions need not be conscious: subliminal happy versus angry faces changed thirsty participants’ pouring, drinking, and willingness to pay without changing their subjective mood ratings; implicit prejudice and introspection studies also indicate verbal reports can miss or distort affective processes.
- ‘Wanting’ and ‘liking’ are separable: dopamine mediated ‘wanting’ but not ‘liking’ in rats, including normal sweetness ‘liking’ after near-total dopamine lesions despite eliminated ‘wanting’; human studies around 2000 confirmed dopamine blockade or reductions did not reduce subjective liking for food, cocaine, or heroin but reduced wanting. The distinction rests on 30 years of animal results and 15 years of human confirmatory findings.
- Motivation concepts shifted from aversive drive/drive reduction to incentive motivation: brain electrode stimulation could be both rewarding and motivating, hunger/thirst cues alone were weak motivators, and drive reduction was weak—rats bar pressed for intragastric nutrients at only about 30% of normal intake, and dogs given intravenous calories still ate customary amounts and became obese.
- Clinical applications include incentive-sensitization in addiction; dopamine dysregulation syndrome in 15% or more of Parkinson’s patients on direct agonists; motivational anhedonia/avolition in schizophrenia, depression, and Parkinson’s as possible loss of ‘wanting’ rather than ‘liking’; and negatively valenced ‘fearful salience’ in nucleus accumbens as a possible contributor to paranoia.
Methods
- Narrative historical review of motivation and emotion concepts in psychology and affective neuroscience, drawing on both animal and human studies; no systematic search, meta-analysis, or formal quantitative pooling is described.
- Evidence discussed includes rat taste-reactivity, dopamine lesions and microinjections, brain stimulation, Pavlovian-instrumental transfer, human neuroimaging and drug studies, and clinical observations.
- Main analysis is conceptual synthesis and argument rather than primary data collection.
Limitations
- Stated: not all conclusions from animal affective neuroscience will transfer to humans; some predictions, such as a human nucleus accumbens desire-dread keyboard, remain untested, and exactly how neural differences produce qualitative emotional differences remains to be understood.
- Evident: as a single-author narrative review, evidence selection and interpretation reflect the author’s theoretical framework; no systematic review protocol, inclusion criteria, or formal bias assessment is reported.
- Evident: many cited animal manipulations use invasive microinjections, lesions, or brain stimulation, and the paper itself notes that extreme or unnatural stimulation parameters may affect conclusions about aversive drive.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
0 of 233 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
In the paper
“Their subjective ratings of mood or emotion were not changed at all by exposures to subliminal and backward-masked emotional faces, whether happy or angry (Winkielman et al., 2005).”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Subjective Feelings Versus Objective Features of Motivation/Emotion > Resolving Whether Emotions Are Necessarily Feelings
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Winkielman et al., 2005 source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Yet subliminal exposure to happy faces elicited a positive affective reaction that remained unconscious, but which could be revealed by presenting thirsty participants with a relevant incentive: a pitcher of fruit beverage.”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Subjective Feelings Versus Objective Features of Motivation/Emotion > Resolving Whether Emotions Are Necessarily Feelings
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Incentive salience as ‘wanting’ is separable also from pleasure ‘liking’ for the same reward, which has important implications for several human clinical disorders.”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Abstract
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearIn the paper
“Further, in ordinary adults under certain circumstances, subliminally brief visual flashes of happy or angry facial expressions can elicit unconscious affective reactions, either positive or negative, which produced no change in subjective mood reports but nonetheless controlled motivated behavior some minutes afterward (Winkielman et al., 2005).”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Subjective Feelings Versus Objective Features of Motivation/Emotion > Resolving Whether Emotions Are Necessarily Feelings
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Winkielman et al., 2005 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“For example, cocaine addicts under some conditions will objectively work to take cocaine infusions, and choose them over saline infusions, even when the cocaine dose is too low to produce any subjective drug feelings of pleasure or arousal (Fischman and Foltin, 1992).”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Subjective Feelings Versus Objective Features of Motivation/Emotion > Resolving Whether Emotions Are Necessarily Feelings
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Fischman and Foltin, 1992
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“But subliminal expressions do induce a valenced affective reaction in human viewers: positive to smiling faces and negative to angry faces (Zajonc, 1980).”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Subjective Feelings Versus Objective Features of Motivation/Emotion > Resolving Whether Emotions Are Necessarily Feelings
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Zajonc, 1980 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“By comparison, ‘liking’ is mediated by a smaller and relatively fragile set of ‘hedonic hotspots,’ which are distributed across the brain but act as an integrated network.”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Applications of Animal Studies to Human Emotions
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearIn the paper
“In passing, it is important that these unconscious affects were evident only if participants were already thirsty (Winkielman et al., 2005).”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Subjective Feelings Versus Objective Features of Motivation/Emotion > Resolving Whether Emotions Are Necessarily Feelings
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Winkielman et al., 2005 source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Further, even complete removal of nearly all dopamine by neurochemical brain lesions left rats’ sweetness ‘liking’ completely normal and unimpaired, despite eliminating all ‘wanting’ to eat (Berridge et al., 1989).”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > ‘Wanting’ Versus ‘Liking’: Implications From Animals to Humans
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Berridge et al., 1989 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Evidence from our studies of brain mechanisms for food reward in rats forced us to change our minds.”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > ‘Wanting’ Versus ‘Liking’: Implications From Animals to Humans
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes
- It may state two separate claims as one. 85
- Probably not a substantial claim. 52
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Valence was evident in that subliminal viewing of angry faces had an opposite negative-valenced impact on the same thirsty participants: they poured less, drank less, and were willing to pay less than after seeing only neutral facial expressions – again without any intervening change in their subjective ratings of emotional mood (Berridge and Winkielman, 2003; Winkielman et al., 2005).”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Subjective Feelings Versus Objective Features of Motivation/Emotion > Resolving Whether Emotions Are Necessarily Feelings
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Berridge and Winkielman, 2003
- Not checked yetcites Winkielman et al., 2005 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Those happy-exposed participants poured more drink, drank more of what they poured, and were willing to pay a much higher monetary price for the drink offered than after viewing emotionally-neutral faces.”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Subjective Feelings Versus Objective Features of Motivation/Emotion > Resolving Whether Emotions Are Necessarily Feelings
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“But for the first decade of this hypothesis, the schematic understanding from animal evidence was all we had, based on objective affective reactions, which stood alone and pointed the way.”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > ‘Wanting’ Versus ‘Liking’: Implications From Animals to Humans
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The distinction between ‘wanting’ and ‘liking’ initially came as a surprise to me and to my colleagues. We had believed until the late 1980s that the two concepts necessarily went together, as two semantic sides of the same psychological coin.”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > ‘Wanting’ Versus ‘Liking’: Implications From Animals to Humans
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Robust and large mesocorticolimbic circuitry can generate intense ‘wanting’ (green), including both mesolimbic dopamine projections and many of its target structures.”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Applications of Animal Studies to Human Emotions
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Conversely, we found that stimulating mesolimbic systems with an electrode to promote dopamine release turned on intense ‘wanting’ to eat, but failed to increase ‘liking’ at all (Berridge and Valenstein, 1991).”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > ‘Wanting’ Versus ‘Liking’: Implications From Animals to Humans
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Berridge and Valenstein, 1991
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“An amphetamine microinjection that releases dopamine in nucleus accumbens selectively magnifies only the CS triggered peaks of cue-triggered ‘wanting,’ without raising baseline effort based on act-outcome expectations or the effect of an irrelevant CS- control sound (Pecina and Berridge, 2013).”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Incentive Motivation: Relating ‘Liking’ to ‘Wanting’
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Pecina and Berridge, 2013
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The size of each hotspot discovered so far is only a cubic millimeter or so in volume in the brain of a rat.”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Incentive Motivation: Relating ‘Liking’ to ‘Wanting’
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Our research findings have indicated that pleasure ‘liking’ is generated by an anatomically small, neurochemically restricted, and functionally fragile brain circuit – which leaves out the large dopamine projection system of ‘wanting’ (Berridge and Kringelbach, 2015).”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Incentive Motivation: Relating ‘Liking’ to ‘Wanting’
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Berridge and Kringelbach, 2015 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“At the moment the rat re-encounters the salt-cue lever in newly depleted state, its mesocorticolimbic dopamine brain system of incentive salience is triggered into high activity, evident neurally as dopamine-related neurons start transcribing genes such as c-fos into protein such as Fos, to trigger metabolic activation of neuronal functions.”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Incentive Motivation: Relating ‘Liking’ to ‘Wanting’ > Theoretical Roots
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Robinson and Berridge, 2013
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The dopamine elevation makes the cues trigger much higher surges of ‘wanting’ than they ordinarily would, but these surges decay within a minute or so once the cue disappears, although the dopamine remains continuously high.”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Incentive Motivation: Relating ‘Liking’ to ‘Wanting’ > Theoretical Roots
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Wyvell and Berridge, 2000
- Not checked yetcites Pecina and Berridge, 2013
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The transformation of the CS-triggered motivation needs no new learning – it happens even before the rat ever re-tastes Dead sea saltiness in its newly ‘liked’ status.”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Incentive Motivation: Relating ‘Liking’ to ‘Wanting’ > Theoretical Roots
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Robinson and Berridge, 2013
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Both the ‘wanting’ and the ‘fear’ generated by these brain manipulations require mesolimbic dopamine signals in the nucleus accumbens.”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Incentive Motivation: Relating ‘Liking’ to ‘Wanting’ > Counter-Intuitive Sharing Between ‘Wanting’ and ‘Fear’
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Richard and Berridge, 2011
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Positive ‘wanting’ required only D1 types of receptor activation by dopamine, whereas negative ‘fear’ required activation of both D1 and D2 types, which implicates additional neuronal circuitry (Richard and Berridge, 2011).”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Incentive Motivation: Relating ‘Liking’ to ‘Wanting’ > Counter-Intuitive Sharing Between ‘Wanting’ and ‘Fear’
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Richard and Berridge, 2011
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Tapping keys in the front of this structure elicits strong ‘wanting,’ reflected as large increases in eating (doubling or quadrupling food intake), or creating a desire to return to the place where the key was tapped.”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Incentive Motivation: Relating ‘Liking’ to ‘Wanting’ > Counter-Intuitive Sharing Between ‘Wanting’ and ‘Fear’
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Reynolds and Berridge, 2008 source
- Not checked yetcites Richard and Berridge, 2011
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Only anatomical extremes resist retuning, so that far-anterior sites remain resolutely appetitive while far-posterior sites remain ‘fear-generating,’ regardless of external ambience (Figure 3).”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Incentive Motivation: Relating ‘Liking’ to ‘Wanting’ > Counter-Intuitive Sharing Between ‘Wanting’ and ‘Fear’
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Reynolds and Berridge, 2008 source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The posterior portion of its medial shell has two ‘fear’ generating neurochemical modes (glutamate AMPA receptor blockade versus GABA receptor activation), and only the GABA mode also generates excessive ‘disgust’.”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Incentive Motivation: Relating ‘Liking’ to ‘Wanting’ > Adding ‘Disgust’ to ‘Fear’ in Nucleus Accumbens
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Faure et al., 2010 source
- Not checked yetcites Ho and Berridge, 2014
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In this discussion, I will sometimes combine motivation and emotion together because those psychological categories overlap in phenomena, making it hard to draw absolute distinctions.”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Introduction
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In some cases, asking people to describe their emotional reasons for making a choice may lead them to construct false explanations of their own behavior. It can lead them astray from their immediate gut reactions that would be more emotionally authentic.”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Subjective Feelings Versus Objective Features of Motivation/Emotion > Resolving Whether Emotions Are Necessarily Feelings
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In fact, most science is rather a matter of reducing uncertainty by degrees, experiment by experiment, gradually building incremental evidence for a particular hypothesis, and gradually ruling out specific alternatives.”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Subjective Feelings Versus Objective Features of Motivation/Emotion > Avoiding Double-Standards for Proof
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Quite a lot of evidence exists, and in my view it does not support the idea that emotions are necessarily conscious, nor that verbal reports are the best way to assess emotion.”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Subjective Feelings Versus Objective Features of Motivation/Emotion > Resolving Whether Emotions Are Necessarily Feelings
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“I review evidence that emotions exist as core psychological processes, which have objectively detectable features, and which can occur either with subjective feelings or without them.”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Abstract
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Conversely, lack of incentive salience may cause motivational forms of anhedonia in depression or schizophrenia, whereas a negatively-valenced form of ‘fearful salience’ may contribute to paranoia.”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Quite a lot of evidence actually contradicts contentions that emotions are always subjective feelings, and instead suggests that emotions can also occur even in people without being subjectively felt – at least under some conditions.”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Subjective Feelings Versus Objective Features of Motivation/Emotion
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Indeed, bringing introspective attention to pleasure feelings may actually dissipate those hedonic feelings: less introspective attention can mean more emotion, as well as more accuracy about the underlying emotional reaction, in some cases (Wilson and Schooler, 1991; Dijksterhuis et al., 2006; Schooler and Mauss, 2010; Torre and Lieberman, 2018).”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Subjective Feelings Versus Objective Features of Motivation/Emotion > Resolving Whether Emotions Are Necessarily Feelings
What the sources say
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Motivation was once thought in terms of aversive drives, and reward was thought of in terms of drive reduction.”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Abstract
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Motivation-as-drive concepts were largely replaced by motivation-as-incentive concepts, yet aversive drive concepts still occasionally surface in reward neuroscience today.”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Abstract
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Conversely, I will often distinguish between conscious or subjective feelings and unconscious or objective core processes within emotion and motivation. Although these often occur together, they sometimes need to be considered separately.”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Introduction
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Excessive incentive salience can cause addictions, in which excessive ‘wanting’ can diverge from cognitive desires.”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“There is also evidence that basic affective reactions can be triggered unconsciously by subliminal stimuli in ordinary humans, and can remain unreportable as feelings even when they go on to change a person’s behavior and subsequent judgments (Zajonc, 1980; Fischman and Foltin, 1992; Berridge and Winkielman, 2003; Winkielman and Berridge, 2004; Winkielman et al., 2005).”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Subjective Feelings Versus Objective Features of Motivation/Emotion > Resolving Whether Emotions Are Necessarily Feelings
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Zajonc, 1980 source
- Not checked yetcites Fischman and Foltin, 1992
- Not checked yetcites Berridge and Winkielman, 2003
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Indeed, some philosophers of science have argued that scientific data never fully prove any hypothesis with complete certainty (there is always a potential alternative lurking in the wings), but only can falsify bad hypotheses (Popper, 1972).”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Subjective Feelings Versus Objective Features of Motivation/Emotion > Avoiding Double-Standards for Proof
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Popper, 1972
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We all agree it is important to distinguish between subjective emotional feelings and objective emotional reactions.”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Subjective Feelings Versus Objective Features of Motivation/Emotion
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Dropping a demand for scientific certainty for emotion in other humans, but insisting on it for animals, is to adopt a double standard on proof.”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Subjective Feelings Versus Objective Features of Motivation/Emotion > Avoiding Double-Standards for Proof
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Verbal reports from other human adults about their feelings are accepted as evidence of emotion on the basis of a socially convenient agreement based on mutual empathy, not scientific certainty.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Ordinarily, incentive salience adds motivational urgency to cognitive desires, but ‘wanting’ and cognitive desires can dissociate in some conditions.”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These emotional reactions occur as core affective processes that can remain intrinsically psychological and emotional, even without conscious feelings, and which have objective consequences and features that can be detected in physiology and/or behavior.”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Subjective Feelings Versus Objective Features of Motivation/Emotion
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“My own view is similar: that affective reactions can occur unconsciously, as well as consciously, and that we share many emotional processes and their brain circuitry with animals.”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Subjective Feelings Versus Objective Features of Motivation/Emotion
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Clearly there is no scientific certainty about the minimum neural circuitry needed for consciousness: neuroscientists disagree among themselves over whether the essential basis is cortical versus subcortical, and so on.”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Subjective Feelings Versus Objective Features of Motivation/Emotion > Avoiding Double-Standards for Proof
Load-bearingStrength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Among incentive concepts, incentive salience is a core motivation process, mediated by brain mesocorticolimbic systems (dopamine-related systems) and sometimes called ‘wanting’ (in quotation marks), to distinguish it from cognitive forms of desire (wanting without quotation marks).”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Finally, negative ‘fear’ and ‘disgust’ have both partial overlap but also important neural differences.”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Abstract
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Sensitized mesolimbic dopamine neurons release more dopamine when a drug is taken, their dopamine-receiving target neurons become more receptive to excitatory glutamate signals, etc.”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Clinical Applications of ‘Liking’ Versus ‘Wanting’
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For now, my main point is simply that these results demonstrate that bivalent affective reactions can be subjectively unconscious even in adult humans, and even when detected objectively in behavior.”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Subjective Feelings Versus Objective Features of Motivation/Emotion > Resolving Whether Emotions Are Necessarily Feelings
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Dopamine surges in nucleus accumbens evoked by addictive amphetamine or by L-DOPA correlate poorly with human subjective liking ratings of the drug - but do control their subjective wanting ratings to take more of that drug (Leyton et al., 2002; Evans et al., 2006).”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > ‘Wanting’ Versus ‘Liking’: Implications From Animals to Humans
What the sources say
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“That is because neural sensitization grows or ‘incubates’ over weeks of drug abstinence, so that craving becomes stronger, and once sensitization emerges it can last years in animals and humans (Paulson et al., 1991; Boileau et al., 2006; Li et al., 2015).”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Clinical Applications of ‘Liking’ Versus ‘Wanting’
What the sources say
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, this lack of therapeutic development could just as well mean that Pavlovian fear learning (e.g., behavioral freezing to a sound that predicts footshock) was not the best animal ‘fear’ reaction for assessing the efficacy of fear-reducing medications.”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Applications of Animal Studies to Human Emotions
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“I believe these include a few from my own lab, and one is the brain-based distinction between ‘wanting’ and ‘liking’ pleasant rewards (Figure 1), described next.”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Applications of Animal Studies to Human Emotions
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thirst is a physiological state that should specifically amplify brain mesolimbic reactivity to perception of a drink, amplifying its incentive salience, and providing a higher brain motivation signal for unconscious emotional reactions to modulate.”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Subjective Feelings Versus Objective Features of Motivation/Emotion > Resolving Whether Emotions Are Necessarily Feelings
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“They suggest: “each animal species has at its disposal some innate primary actions that implement the functions we have assigned to the ur-emotions” (p. 412)”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Applications of Animal Studies to Human Emotions
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Frijda and Parrott, 2011
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In any case, a counterargument has been made that many of the current anti-anxiety medications used by human patients actually were developed through various animal models of ‘fearful’ reactions (Treit et al., 2010; Bourin, 2015).”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Applications of Animal Studies to Human Emotions
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Treit et al., 2010
- Not checked yetcites Bourin, 2015 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Schematic understanding is the way we study perception, learning, memory and cognition in animals. It’s even how we measure and understand perception in people whose visual world differs from ours (e.g., detecting color blindness).”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Applications of Animal Studies to Human Emotions
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Similarly, the psychologists of emotion Nico Frijda and W. Gerrod Parrott, posit that animals as well as humans can express ‘ur-emotions,’ as objectively detectable psychological processes that combine appraisals, affective attitudes and action readiness.”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Applications of Animal Studies to Human Emotions
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Frijda and Parrott, 2011
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For that, we need to posit continuity between those affective mechanisms in animals and humans.”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Applications of Animal Studies to Human Emotions
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Similarly, it is now increasingly clear that increases of human dopamine do not reliably cause enhancement of subjective ratings of pleasure (although many rewards do induce dopamine release as a consequence and correlate, but not the cause, of pleasure) (Leyton et al., 2002; Evans et al., 2006; Liggins et al., 2012).”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > ‘Wanting’ Versus ‘Liking’: Implications From Animals to Humans
What the sources say
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In short, the early animal evidence showed that ‘liking’ was different from ‘wanting,’ and that dopamine mediated ‘wanting’ but not ‘liking’ (Figure 1).”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > ‘Wanting’ Versus ‘Liking’: Implications From Animals to Humans
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“And there are many other cases where animal studies of emotion have produced results with successful implications for understanding human psychology and disorders.”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Applications of Animal Studies to Human Emotions
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Studies began to report that blockade of human dopamine receptors by antagonist drugs, or dietary-induced reductions of dopamine release, did not reduce people’s subjective liking ratings for food pleasure, or for drug pleasures of cocaine or heroin (Brauer and De Wit, 1997; Leyton, 2010; Sienkiewicz-Jarosz et al., 2013).”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > ‘Wanting’ Versus ‘Liking’: Implications From Animals to Humans
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Brauer and De Wit, 1997
- Not checked yetcites Leyton, 2010
- Not checked yetcites Sienkiewicz-Jarosz et al., 2013 source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“According to drive theories, the intense motivations had to be aversive.”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Clinical Applications of ‘Liking’ Versus ‘Wanting’ > The Fall of Drive Theories
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Drive was typically conceived as an aversive state that goaded behavior into action to reduce the unpleasant drive (hunger, thirst, sex, drug withdrawal, etc.).”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Clinical Applications of ‘Liking’ Versus ‘Wanting’ > History of Motivation Concepts in Psychology and Neuroscience
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“However, other neuroscientists have found that mice will actually work to turn on their hypothalamic AgRP neurons that previously made them eat, indicating that the increased appetite can be dissociated from negative valence, and even take on a positive valence in the right conditions (Chen et al., 2016).”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Clinical Applications of ‘Liking’ Versus ‘Wanting’ > History of Motivation Concepts in Psychology and Neuroscience
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Chen et al., 2016 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Receptor-stimulated DDS patients can become sensitized, and are reported to compulsively pursue incentive activities in an addictive-like fashion: gambling, shopping, sex, internet, hobbies, taking drugs or even over-consuming their medications in much higher quantities than intended by their physicians (Ondo and Lai, 2008; Callesen et al., 2013; Friedman and Chang, 2013; Politis et al., 2013).”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Clinical Applications of ‘Liking’ Versus ‘Wanting’
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Ondo and Lai, 2008
- Not checked yetcites Callesen et al., 2013 source
- Not checked yetcites Friedman and Chang, 2013
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“For example, in drug addiction, the opponent-process theory posited negative hedonic states of withdrawal and dysphoria to be the chief force driving addicts to take drugs (Solomon and Corbit, 1974), a view that still has adherents (Koob and Volkow, 2016; Keramati et al., 2017).”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Clinical Applications of ‘Liking’ Versus ‘Wanting’ > History of Motivation Concepts in Psychology and Neuroscience
What the sources say
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Natural motivations were viewed by drive-reduction theory as generators of aversive states, triggered by signals for physiological homeostatic needs (low nutrient reserves for hunger, dehydration for thirst) or of other forms of deprivation (lack of sex, withdrawal from addictive drugs, etc.) (Hull, 1951; Miller, 1971).”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Clinical Applications of ‘Liking’ Versus ‘Wanting’ > History of Motivation Concepts in Psychology and Neuroscience
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hull, 1951
- Not checked yetcites Miller, 1971
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“on grounds that dopamine does not actually cause pleasure nor does dopamine downregulation cause pleasure deficits, and on grounds that addictions persist after withdrawal syndromes go away (Berridge and Robinson, 2016).”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Clinical Applications of ‘Liking’ Versus ‘Wanting’ > History of Motivation Concepts in Psychology and Neuroscience
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Berridge and Robinson, 2016
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“However, a mouse may subsequently avoid a flavor that was paired with the AgRP neuronal stimulation that made it eat, leading some authors to suggest that stimulated hunger is necessarily an aversive drive that the mouse later associates with the flavor (Betley et al., 2015).”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Clinical Applications of ‘Liking’ Versus ‘Wanting’ > History of Motivation Concepts in Psychology and Neuroscience
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Betley et al., 2015 source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Drive reduction served as reward in this motivational framework; not as a positive pleasure or incentive, but in a negative reinforcement sense of eliminating the aversive drive.”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Clinical Applications of ‘Liking’ Versus ‘Wanting’ > History of Motivation Concepts in Psychology and Neuroscience
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Many patients who pursue one of those activities may also pursue a second or a third, as their sensitized ‘wanting’ spills over into several potential targets and typically the compulsive motivations decline when the medications are reduced or stopped.”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Clinical Applications of ‘Liking’ Versus ‘Wanting’
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“According to drive reduction theories, reward was produced by reducing motivations, not by increasing drives.”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Clinical Applications of ‘Liking’ Versus ‘Wanting’ > The Fall of Drive Theories
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Some investigators therefore have suggested their deficit really reflects a selective loss of incentive motivation or ‘wanting,’ rather than loss of pleasure ‘liking’ (Sienkiewicz-Jarosz et al., 2005; Dowd and Barch, 2010; Treadway and Zald, 2011; Barch et al., 2014).”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Clinical Applications of ‘Liking’ Versus ‘Wanting’
What the sources say
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Their respective rewards were all viewed to reduce the unpleasant drives, by consuming the drive’s goal object until the aversive deficit state was gone (food, water, copulation, addictive drug, etc.).”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Clinical Applications of ‘Liking’ Versus ‘Wanting’ > History of Motivation Concepts in Psychology and Neuroscience
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hull, 1951
- Not checked yetcites Miller, 1971
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“It quickly became clear that brain reward electrodes were not only rewarding (in the sense that rats and people worked eagerly to activate them), but the same electrodes were also often powerfully motivating in the sense of apparently turning on natural motivations.”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Clinical Applications of ‘Liking’ Versus ‘Wanting’ > The Fall of Drive Theories
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“However, recent studies suggest that many patients with schizophrenia or Parkinson’s, and possibly some with major depression, are not actually anhedonic after all: they report normal sensory pleasure ratings of ice cream or other sensory reward in the moment, even though they attach little value to any sensory, social or other pleasant reward in life.”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Clinical Applications of ‘Liking’ Versus ‘Wanting’
What the sources say
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The electrodes may actually not have caused much pleasure ‘liking’ after all, but they certainly activated ‘wanting’ for a variety of natural incentives (Berridge and Kringelbach, 2015).”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Clinical Applications of ‘Liking’ Versus ‘Wanting’ > The Fall of Drive Theories
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Berridge and Kringelbach, 2015 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Hunger neurons are thought to include those in the hypothalamus that release agouti-related peptide (AgRP), and stimulating those neurons cause mice to eat.”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Clinical Applications of ‘Liking’ Versus ‘Wanting’ > History of Motivation Concepts in Psychology and Neuroscience
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“That is, simply giving free stimulations of the electrodes, without making them work for it, caused rats to suddenly start eating, or start drinking, or begin engaging in sex, or parental behaviors, etc. (Valenstein et al., 1970).”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Clinical Applications of ‘Liking’ Versus ‘Wanting’ > The Fall of Drive Theories
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Valenstein et al., 1970 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Thus behavioral neuroscientists of the time expected that an electrode that increased sex or hunger or thirst motivations, would be a punishing electrode. They expected that a reward electrode would reduce drive, and so stop any ongoing eating, drinking, or sex behavior – never stimulate those motivations.”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Clinical Applications of ‘Liking’ Versus ‘Wanting’ > The Fall of Drive Theories
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Miller, 1973
- Not checked yetcites Olds, 1973
- Not checked yetcites Stuber and Wise, 2016
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Compulsive motivations of DDS do not seem to involve higher pleasure ‘liking’ for the pursued reward once obtained, but rather exist alone as intense and often disturbing ‘wants.’”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Clinical Applications of ‘Liking’ Versus ‘Wanting’
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“However, this hedonic deficiency view has been critiqued on grounds that dopamine receptor downregulation is probably a consequence of drug taking rather than the original cause of addiction, on grounds that dopamine does not actually cause pleasure nor does dopamine downregulation cause pleasure deficits, and on grounds that addictions persist after withdrawal syndromes go away (Berridge and”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Clinical Applications of ‘Liking’ Versus ‘Wanting’ > History of Motivation Concepts in Psychology and Neuroscience
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Berridge and Robinson, 2016
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“These thirst-study authors found that artificial stimulation of neurons in the hypothalamus made mice drink, but that mice would work to turn off the stimulation if given a choice, thus leading the authors to suggest that thirst is essentially aversive.”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Clinical Applications of ‘Liking’ Versus ‘Wanting’ > History of Motivation Concepts in Psychology and Neuroscience
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Allen et al., 2017 source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Similarly in human psychiatric patients who had been implanted with similar brain electrodes, activation of a reward electrode caused sudden sexual urges, or urges to drink, or other intense motivations, in addition to supporting button pressing to self-stimulate their electrodes (Moan and Heath, 1972).”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Clinical Applications of ‘Liking’ Versus ‘Wanting’ > The Fall of Drive Theories
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Moan and Heath, 1972
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“To drive theorists, a reward electrode that also increased motivation is an inexplicable paradox (Miller, 1973; Olds, 1973; Stuber and Wise, 2016).”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Clinical Applications of ‘Liking’ Versus ‘Wanting’ > The Fall of Drive Theories
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Miller, 1973
- Not checked yetcites Olds, 1973
- Not checked yetcites Stuber and Wise, 2016
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Modern proponents suggest that downregulation or loss of brain dopamine D2 receptors (one of the two main types of neuronal receptors for dopamine) make addicts experience less pleasure in their lives than other people (Koob and Volkow, 2016; Keramati et al., 2017). Consequently, these theorists argue that addicts must take addictive drugs to achieve normal levels of dopamine stimulation and”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Clinical Applications of ‘Liking’ Versus ‘Wanting’ > History of Motivation Concepts in Psychology and Neuroscience
What the sources say
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✗ Asserted: fails✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“That is, a food incentive cue elicits eating, but a hunger cue does not.”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Clinical Applications of ‘Liking’ Versus ‘Wanting’ > The Fall of Drive Theories
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Incentive motivation theories posit that motivation is directed toward affectively positive incentives, and that brain motivation systems modulate those incentive values (Toates, 1986; Berridge, 2004).”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Incentive Motivation: Relating ‘Liking’ to ‘Wanting’
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Toates, 1986
- Not checked yetcites Berridge, 2004 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Similarly, hungry rats merely walked slowly to a place where they expect intra-gastric milk, but eagerly ran to a place where they could drink and taste the milk while hungry (Miller and Kessen, 1952).”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Clinical Applications of ‘Liking’ Versus ‘Wanting’ > The Fall of Drive Theories
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Miller and Kessen, 1952
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Incentive motivation is focused on reward, which involve three categories of mechanism: wanting, liking and learning.”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Incentive Motivation: Relating ‘Liking’ to ‘Wanting’
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“For example, delivering daily calories intravenously to dogs, who were also allowed to eat actual food normally if they wished, did not suppress their daily eating intake: the dogs continued to eat customary amounts of food in addition to their full doses of intravenous nutrients, and so soon became obese (Turner et al., 1975).”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Clinical Applications of ‘Liking’ Versus ‘Wanting’ > The Fall of Drive Theories
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Turner et al., 1975
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“However, if opportunity to taste a mouthful of saccharin at the same time as a gastric nutrient infusion, then the rats do learn to bar press for the combination (the sweet taste by itself is similarly insufficient, revealing an importance of interaction between incentive stimulus and physiological state, captured by Bindra-Toates rules of incentive motivation described below) (Holman, 1969).”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Clinical Applications of ‘Liking’ Versus ‘Wanting’ > The Fall of Drive Theories
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Holman, 1969 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Hunger acts to enhance the incentive value of food, and thirst enhances the incentive value of water – but in the absence of incentives or their learned expectation, neither need state effectively motivates behavior as posited by aversive drive theory.”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Clinical Applications of ‘Liking’ Versus ‘Wanting’ > The Fall of Drive Theories
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Similarly, for thirst,: encountering a place paired with thirst drive does not alter behavior, but encountering a cue for water will evoke intense increases in activity in thirsty rats, as though searching for water (Campbell, 1960).”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Clinical Applications of ‘Liking’ Versus ‘Wanting’ > The Fall of Drive Theories
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Campbell, 1960 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“For example, rats typically fail to increase eating in a place previously paired with hunger drive, nor to increase drinking in a place paired with thirst drive (Huston, 1972; Mineka et al., 1972; Toates, 1986).”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Clinical Applications of ‘Liking’ Versus ‘Wanting’ > The Fall of Drive Theories
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Huston, 1972
- Not checked yetcites Mineka et al., 1972 source
- Not checked yetcites Toates, 1986
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“‘Liking’ reactions reflect the hedonic impact of pleasant reward, and is often considered the essentional kernal of reward.”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Incentive Motivation: Relating ‘Liking’ to ‘Wanting’
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In these cases, cues for the incentive stimulus evoke motivation in a state, whereas cues for the drive state by itself do not.”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Clinical Applications of ‘Liking’ Versus ‘Wanting’ > The Fall of Drive Theories
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Both incentive motivation and fearful motivation require local mesolimbic dopamine.”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Incentive Motivation: Relating ‘Liking’ to ‘Wanting’
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Reynolds and Berridge (2008) source
- Not checked yetcites Richard and Berridge (2011)
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Incentive salience makes those reward cues attractive and attention-grabbing, eliciting approach and giving them a ‘motivational magnet’ property (Saunders and Robinson, 2013; Flagel and Robinson, 2017).”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Incentive Motivation: Relating ‘Liking’ to ‘Wanting’ > Psychological Features of Incentive Salience as ‘Wanting’
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Saunders and Robinson, 2013
- Not checked yetcites Flagel and Robinson, 2017
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“However, a ‘wanting’ increase may still may occur in such a case, again illustrating the more robust nature of ‘wanting’ circuitry (Smith and Berridge, 2007; Berridge and Kringelbach, 2015).”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Incentive Motivation: Relating ‘Liking’ to ‘Wanting’
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Smith and Berridge, 2007
- Not checked yetcites Berridge and Kringelbach, 2015 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Frederick Toates suggested in the 1980s that reward cues additionally participate in a CS-state interaction, similar to a reward UCS-state interaction called alliesthesia.”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Incentive Motivation: Relating ‘Liking’ to ‘Wanting’ > Theoretical Roots
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Toates, 1986
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Incentive salience is often thus a spur to action, reflecting the overlap between dopamine functions of motivation and of movement (Salamone et al., 2015, 2018).”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Incentive Motivation: Relating ‘Liking’ to ‘Wanting’ > Psychological Features of Incentive Salience as ‘Wanting’
What the sources say
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Reward cues alone are relatively powerless at producing motivation without an appropriate brain state. It’s the brain’s reaction to a cue that matters for ‘wanting’ motivation via incentive salience (Berridge, 2012; Dayan and Berridge, 2014).”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Incentive Motivation: Relating ‘Liking’ to ‘Wanting’ > Theoretical Roots
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Berridge, 2012 source
- Not checked yetcites Dayan and Berridge, 2014
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“That is, an incentive percept (food or associated cues) would generate intense motivation when perceived in a physiologically hungry state, but not so much when perceived in a satiated state.”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Incentive Motivation: Relating ‘Liking’ to ‘Wanting’ > Theoretical Roots
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Toates, 1986
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Toates suggested that a learned cue or CS similarly interacted with an individual’s current internal state to generate incentive motivation.”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Incentive Motivation: Relating ‘Liking’ to ‘Wanting’ > Theoretical Roots
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Toates, 1986
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“These cue features include the ability of CSs to trigger motivated ‘wanting’ to seek and consume their reward, and to a degree also trigger hedonic ‘liking.’”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Incentive Motivation: Relating ‘Liking’ to ‘Wanting’ > Theoretical Roots
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Bindra, 1978 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Alliesthesia refers to the phenomenon that food becomes more hedonically rewarding when we are in a state of hunger, water is more rewarding when thirsty, nasty seawater becomes a rewarding taste if we are sodium-deprived, warmth is more rewarding when we are cold, coolness more rewarding when we are hot, and so on (Cabanac, 1971).”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Incentive Motivation: Relating ‘Liking’ to ‘Wanting’ > Theoretical Roots
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Cabanac, 1971 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“This may be why people who experience a novel salt appetite sometimes report feeling slightly ill, but do not necessarily crave salt (Leshem, 2009).”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Incentive Motivation: Relating ‘Liking’ to ‘Wanting’ > Theoretical Roots
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Leshem, 2009 source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“This hypothesis is based on evidence of mesolimbic dopamine hyperactivity in schizophrenia, and also on the ability of anti-dopamine drugs that block D2 receptors to treat schizophrenic symptoms.”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Incentive Motivation: Relating ‘Liking’ to ‘Wanting’ > Counter-Intuitive Sharing Between ‘Wanting’ and ‘Fear’
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Howes and Kapur, 2009 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In humans, disgust and fear expressions have nearly opposite statistical patterns of facial configuration, giving rise to the suggestion that these facial expressions may oppositely modulate sensory feedback: fear expressions may enhance relevant sensory perception (e.g., eye widening), whereas disgust may suppress relevant sensory perception (Susskind et al., 2008).”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Incentive Motivation: Relating ‘Liking’ to ‘Wanting’ > Adding ‘Disgust’ to ‘Fear’ in Nucleus Accumbens
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Susskind et al., 2008 source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Addiction is the most extreme example, as neural sensitization makes brain dopamine systems more permanently hyper-responsive to drugs and drug cues, triggering strong urges to relapse and actually take drugs.”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Incentive Motivation: Relating ‘Liking’ to ‘Wanting’ > Dopamine Sensitization of ‘Wanting’ in Addiction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Berridge and Robinson, 2016
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Sensitized ‘wanting’ in addicts creates a probabilistic form of cue-triggered compulsion, in the form of exaggerated temptation that can come by surprise, be amplified further by stress, and be hard to resist (Berridge and Robinson, 2016).”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Incentive Motivation: Relating ‘Liking’ to ‘Wanting’ > Dopamine Sensitization of ‘Wanting’ in Addiction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Berridge and Robinson, 2016
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“However, neural mechanisms that generate ‘disgust’ and ‘fear’ reactions are mostly distinct, though they do partly overlap in the posterior shell of nucleus accumbens (Faure et al., 2010; Maren et al., 2013; Ho and Berridge, 2014; Perusini and Fanselow, 2015; Paré and Quirk, 2017).”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Incentive Motivation: Relating ‘Liking’ to ‘Wanting’ > Adding ‘Disgust’ to ‘Fear’ in Nucleus Accumbens
What the sources say
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In many cases, conclusions can transfer from affective neuroscience studies based on animals to human emotions and motivations.”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Conclusion
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Of course, an incremental difference at one overlapping stage of a neural circuit can still be translated into qualitative neural and psychological differences at other stages to recruit different anatomical patterns of activity.”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Incentive Motivation: Relating ‘Liking’ to ‘Wanting’ > Adding ‘Disgust’ to ‘Fear’ in Nucleus Accumbens
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: An incremental difference at one overlapping stage of a neural circuit can be translated into qualitative neural and psychological differences at other stages.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“But those that do often carry important implications for understanding human clinical affective disorders.”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Conclusion
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Admittedly, not all conclusions will transfer.”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Conclusion
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In such cases, animal findings at the very least tell investigators what to look for in people, shaping the questions to be asked so that the right answers are found.”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Incentive Motivation: Relating ‘Liking’ to ‘Wanting’ > Adding ‘Disgust’ to ‘Fear’ in Nucleus Accumbens
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Because nucleus accumbens neurons normally inhibit their targets (by themselves releasing GABA as neurotransmitter), this stronger inhibition could release downstream neurons in ventral pallidum and other targets into higher excitation levels, to produce the additional emotional reaction.”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Incentive Motivation: Relating ‘Liking’ to ‘Wanting’ > Adding ‘Disgust’ to ‘Fear’ in Nucleus Accumbens
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Best progress in building an integrated psychology and affective neuroscience of emotion and motivation requires combining human and animal approaches together, and consideration of both subjective and objective features of affective reactions.”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Conclusion
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These core affective processes can be schematically understood, so that their psychological features become objectively identified, and allowing them to be mapped to underlying brain mechanisms.”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Conclusion
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The GABA drug probably produces a stronger electrophysiological inhibition of shell neurons than the glutamate blocking drug (e.g., DNQX), which produces only a mode of pure coping ‘fear.’”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Incentive Motivation: Relating ‘Liking’ to ‘Wanting’ > Adding ‘Disgust’ to ‘Fear’ in Nucleus Accumbens
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Emotional and motivational processes occur in people most notably as subjective feelings, but also have underlying core psychological processes with objective features.”
§ Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation > Conclusion
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The authors state this as an assumption.
Verbal reports from other human adults about their feelings are accepted as evidence of emotion on the basis of a socially convenient agreement based on mutual empathy, not scientific certainty.
“But this is a socially convenient agreement based on mutual empathy. It is essentially an assumption we are willing to make for each other (and perhaps evolutionarily compelled to make), but not a scientific certainty.”
The paper relies on this without support.
It is possible to induce mesolimbic sensitization without drugs in susceptible individuals, such as by exposures to traumatic stresses or strong specific appetites.
“However, it has subsequently become clear that it is also possible to induce mesolimbic sensitization without drugs in susceptible individuals, such as by exposures to traumatic stresses, exposures to strong specific appetites, etc.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Some people who are especially vulnerable to developing mesolimbic sensitization may become spontaneously sensitized in particular situations via endogenous mechanisms, resulting in behavioral addictions.
“Recently it has even become plausible that some people, who may be especially vulnerable to developing mesolimbic sensitization, may become ‘spontaneously’ sensitized in particular situations via endogenous mechanisms, resulting in behavioral addictions.”
The paper relies on this without support.
There are strong individual differences in sensitization vulnerability, due to genes, hormones, previous experiences, etc.
“There are strong individual differences in sensitization vulnerability, due to genes, hormones, previous experiences, etc.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Those who develop behavioral addictions are the most vulnerable individuals, able to develop mesolimbic sensitization via endogenous mechanisms, without need of drugs.
“Presumably those who develop behavioral addictions are the most vulnerable individuals, able to develop mesolimbic sensitization via endogenous mechanisms, without need of drugs.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Modern people and modern lab rats have more than enough NaCl in their foods, so that they have never in their lives been sodium deficient.
“modern people and modern lab rats have more than enough NaCl in our foods, so that we have never in our lives been sodium deficient.”
The paper relies on this without support.
An incremental difference at one overlapping stage of a neural circuit can be translated into qualitative neural and psychological differences at other stages.
“Of course, an incremental difference at one overlapping stage of a neural circuit can still be translated into qualitative neural and psychological differences at other stages to recruit different anatomical patterns of activity.”
The paper relies on this without support.
‘Fear’ defends against external bodily danger threats, while ‘disgust’ defends against oral and internal toxic threats.
“‘Fear’ defends against external bodily danger threats, while ‘disgust’ defends against oral and internal toxic threats.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Emotions will typically be more temporary than motivation, but this is a fuzzy distinction.”
From Motivation-Achievement Cycles in Learning: a Literature Review and Research Agenda (2022) · cites this paper as Berridge, 2018
Citations
Cites
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.68 · Cited by 54,599
The expression of the emotions in man and animals.
Darwin, C. D. (1872) · J. Murray eBooks · doi:10.1037/10001-000 · Cited by 12,120
Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.
Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.3.231 · Cited by 11,317
Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences.
Zajonc, R. B. (1980) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.35.2.151 · Cited by 8,094
Nagel, T. (1974) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/2183914 · Cited by 7,440
The neural basis of drug craving: An incentive-sensitization theory of addiction
Robinson, T. (1993) · Brain Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/0165-0173(93)90013-p · Cited by 7,346
Cognitive, social, and physiological determinants of emotional state.
Schachter, S., & Singer, J. (1962) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0046234 · Cited by 6,223
The varieties of religious experience: A study in human nature.
James, W. (1902) · doi:10.1037/10004-000 · Cited by 5,204
Moral Identity and Developmental Theory
Lapsley, D. K. (2015) · Human Development · doi:10.1159/000435926 · Cited by 3,843
Neurobiology of addiction: a neurocircuitry analysis
Koob, G. F., & Volkow, N. D. (2016) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(16)00104-8 · Cited by 3,698
JAMES, W. (1884) · Mind · doi:10.1093/mind/os-ix.34.188 · Cited by 3,446
Delay of gratification in children.
Mischel, W., Shoda, Y., & Rodriguez, M. L. (1989) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2658056 · Cited by 3,397
Russell, J. A., & Barrett, L. F. (1999) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.76.5.805 · Cited by 3,355
Olds, J., & Milner, P. (1954) · Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0058775 · Cited by 3,176
Self-reports: How the questions shape the answers.
Schwarz, N. (1999) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.54.2.93 · Cited by 2,846
The Dopamine Hypothesis of Schizophrenia: Version III--The Final Common Pathway
Howes, O. D., & Kapur, S. (2009) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbp006 · Cited by 2,693
(2017) · Cited by 2,433
Ekman, P. (1999) · Handbook of Cognition and Emotion · doi:10.1002/0470013494.ch3 · Cited by 2,125
Berridge, K. C., & Kringelbach, M. L. (2015) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.02.018 · Cited by 1,730
Self-citationAn opponent-process theory of motivation. I. Temporal dynamics of affect
Solomon, R. L., & Corbit, J. D. (1974) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0036128 · Cited by 1,704
Conscious and unconscious emotional learning in the human amygdala
Morris, J. S., Öhman, A., & Dolan, R. J. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/30976 · Cited by 1,665
Reconsidering anhedonia in depression: Lessons from translational neuroscience
Treadway, M. T., & Zald, D. H. (2011) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.06.006 · Cited by 1,579
The contextual brain: implications for fear conditioning, extinction and psychopathology
Maren, S., Phan, K. L., & Liberzon, I. (2013) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3492 · Cited by 1,547
Cabanac, M. (1971) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.173.4002.1103 · Cited by 1,521
Liking, wanting, and the incentive-sensitization theory of addiction
Berridge, K. C., & Robinson, T. E. (2016) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/amp0000059 · Cited by 1,440
Self-citationThinking too much: Introspection can reduce the quality of preferences and decisions.
Wilson, T. D., & Schooler, J. W. (1991) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.60.2.181 · Cited by 1,417
A mechanism for impaired fear recognition after amygdala damage
Adolphs, R., Gosselin, F., Buchanan, T. W., Tranel, D., Schyns, P., & Damasio, A. R. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03086 · Cited by 1,331 · cited 1×
“Of course, subliminally seeing emotional facial expressions is not equivalent to inducing the corresponding full emotion (Adolphs et al., 2005; Anderson et al., 2006).”
BackgroundMotivation concepts in behavioral neuroscience
Berridge, K. C. (2004) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2004.02.004 · Cited by 1,302
Self-citationThe taste reactivity test. I. Mimetic responses to gustatory stimuli in neurologically normal rats
Grill, H. J., & Norgren, R. (1978) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0006-8993(78)90568-1 · Cited by 1,220
On making the right choice: the deliberation-without-attention effect.
Dijksterhuis, A., Bos, M. W., Nordgren, L. F., & van Baaren, R. B. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1121629 · Cited by 1,159
Deep Brain Stimulation to Reward Circuitry Alleviates Anhedonia in Refractory Major Depression
Schlaepfer, T. E., Cohen, M. X., Frick, C., Kosel, M., Brodesser, D., Axmacher, N., Joe, A. Y., Kreft, M., Lenartz, D., & Sturm, V. (2008) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/sj.npp.1301408 · Cited by 1,027
Value from hedonic experience and engagement
Higgins, E. T. (2006) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.113.3.439 · Cited by 949
LeDoux, J. E. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1400335111 · Cited by 891
The Emotional Brain: The Mysterious Underpinnings of Emotional Life
Evans, H. M. (2000) · Neuropsychoanalysis · doi:10.1080/15294145.2000.10773288 · Cited by 768
Wyvell, C. L., & Berridge, K. C. (2000) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.20-21-08122.2000 · Cited by 764 · cited 1×
“Later studies in our lab went on to identify various psychological signature features of dopamine-mediated ‘wanting’ or incentive salience, which will be described later (Wyvell and Berridge, 2000; Peciña et al., 2003; Smith et al., 2011; Pecina and Berridge, 2013).”
BackgroundSelf-citationSteiner, J. E., Glaser, D., Hawilo, M. E., & Berridge, K. C. (2001) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0149-7634(00)00051-8 · Cited by 752
Self-citationHow adaptive behavior is produced: a perceptual-motivational alternative to response reinforcements
Bindra, D. (1978) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00059380 · Cited by 732
Berridge, K. (2000) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0149-7634(99)00072-x · Cited by 721
Self-citationWinkielman, P., Berridge, K. C., & Wilbarger, J. L. (2005) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167204271309 · Cited by 708
Self-citationNeural correlates of food addiction
Gearhardt, A. N. (2011) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.32 · Cited by 707
Neurons for hunger and thirst transmit a negative-valence teaching signal
Betley, J. N., Xu, S., Cao, Z. F. H., Gong, R., Magnus, C. J., Yu, Y., & Sternson, S. M. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14416 · Cited by 704
From prediction error to incentive salience: mesolimbic computation of reward motivation.
Berridge, K. C. (2012) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2012.07990.x · Cited by 700
Self-citationIn bad taste: evidence for the oral origins of moral disgust
Chapman, H. A., Kim, D. A., Susskind, J. M., & Anderson, A. K. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1165565 · Cited by 691
A framework for studying emotions across species
Anderson, D. J., & Adolphs, R. (2014) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.03.003 · Cited by 691
(2003) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195126013.003.0029 · Cited by 608
Expressing fear enhances sensory acquisition.
Susskind, J. M., Lee, D. H., Cusi, A., Feiman, R., Grabski, W., & Anderson, A. K. (2008) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.2138 · Cited by 595
Pleasure: the common currency.
Cabanac, M. (1992) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/s0022-5193(05)80594-6 · Cited by 589
The basic emotional circuits of mammalian brains: Do animals have affective lives?
Panksepp, J. (2011) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.08.003 · Cited by 588
Keltner, D. J., Ekman, P., Gonzaga, G. C., & Beer, J. S. (2002) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195126013.003.0022 · Cited by 555
Hyperdopaminergic mutant mice have higher "wanting" but not "liking" for sweet rewards
Peciña, S., Cagniard, B., Berridge, K. C., Aldridge, J. W., & Zhuang, X. (2003) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.23-28-09395.2003 · Cited by 551
Self-citationLateral hypothalamic circuits for feeding and reward
Stuber, G. D., & Wise, R. A. (2016) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.4220 · Cited by 544
(2018) · Pantheon Books · Cited by 529
Compulsive overeating as an addiction disorder. A review of theory and evidence
Davis, C. A., & Carter, J. C. (2009) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2009.05.018 · Cited by 526
Lesse, S. (1961) · American Journal of Psychotherapy · doi:10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.1961.15.3.478 · Cited by 525
Long, C. G., Blundell, J. E., & Finlayson, G. (2015) · Obesity Facts · doi:10.1159/000442403 · Cited by 510
Leyton, M. (2002) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1016/s0893-133x(02)00366-4 · Cited by 476
Compulsive drug use linked to sensitized ventral striatal dopamine transmission.
Evans, A. H., Pavese, N., Lawrence, A. D., Tai, Y. F., Appel, S., Doder, M., Brooks, D. J., Lees, A. J., & Piccini, P. (2006) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.20822 · Cited by 473
Disentangling pleasure from incentive salience and learning signals in brain reward circuitry
Smith, K. S., Berridge, K. C., & Aldridge, J. W. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1101920108 · Cited by 464
Self-citationVoon, V., Mole, T. B., Banca, P., Porter, L., Morris, L., Mitchell, S., Lapa, T. R., Karr, J., Harrison, N. A., Potenza, M. N., et al. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0102419 · Cited by 462
Paulson, P. E., Camp, D. M., & Robinson, T. E. (1991) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/bf02244248 · Cited by 455
Smith, K. S., & Berridge, K. C. (2007) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4205-06.2007 · Cited by 450
Self-citationWhat is an unconscious emotion?(The case for unconscious "liking")
Berridge, K. C., & Winkielman, P. (2003) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699930302289 · Cited by 441
Self-citationWinkielman, P., & Berridge, K. C. (2004) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00288.x · Cited by 405
Self-citationPutting feelings into words: Affect labeling as implicit emotion regulation
Torre, J. B., & Lieberman, M. D. (2018) · Emotion Review · doi:10.1177/1754073917742706 · Cited by 402
Neurobehavioral perspectives on the distinction between fear and anxietyPreprint
Perusini, J. N., & Fanselow, M. S. (2015) · Learning & Memory · doi:10.1101/lm.039180.115 · Cited by 390
Reexamination of the role of the hypothalamus in motivation.
Valenstein, E. S., Cox, V. C., & Kakolewski, J. W. (1970) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0028581 · Cited by 390
Thirst-associated preoptic neurons encode an aversive motivational drive.
Allen, W. E., DeNardo, L. A., Chen, M. Z., Liu, C. D., Loh, K. M., Fenno, L. E., Ramakrishnan, C., Deisseroth, K., & Luo, L. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aan6747 · Cited by 390 · cited 1×
“Recently, a thirst drive-reduction hypothesis was suggested by authors of a study similar to the first AgRP one for hunger (Allen et al., 2017).”
ResultThe Role of Learning in the Operation of Motivational Systems
Dickinson, A., & Balleine, B. W. (2002) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/0471214426.pas0312 · Cited by 387
Model-based and model-free Pavlovian reward learning: Revaluation, revision, and revelation
Dayan, P., & Berridge, K. C. (2014) · Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/s13415-014-0277-8 · Cited by 357
Self-citationBerridge, K. C., Venier, I. L., & Robinson, T. E. (1989) · Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.1037/0735-7044.103.1.36 · Cited by 356
Self-citationDeep homology of arthropod central complex and vertebrate basal ganglia.
Strausfeld, N. J., & Hirth, F. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1231828 · Cited by 354
Conditioned cues elicit feeding in sated rats: a role for learning in meal initiation.
Weingarten, H. P. (1983) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.6836286 · Cited by 341
Barch, D. M., Treadway, M. T., & Schoen, N. (2014) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0036299 · Cited by 323
Instant transformation of learned repulsion into motivational “wanting”
Robinson, M. J. F., & Berridge, K. C. (2013) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2013.01.016 · Cited by 320
Self-citationReward learning: reinforcement, incentives, and expectations
Berridge, K. C. (2000) · Psychology of Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/s0079-7421(00)80022-5 · Cited by 318
Self-citationBoileau, I., Dagher, A., Leyton, M., Gunn, R. N., Baker, G. B., Diksic, M., & Benkelfat, C. (2006) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.63.12.1386 · Cited by 305
James, W. D. (1920) · Atlantic Monthly Press eBooks · doi:10.1037/11011-000 · Cited by 304
Berridge, K. C., & Valenstein, E. S. (1991) · Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.1037/0735-7044.105.1.3 · Cited by 302
Self-citationO'Sullivan, S. S., Wu, K., Politis, M., Lawrence, A. D., Evans, A. H., Bose, S. K., Djamshidian, A., Lees, A. J., & Piccini, P. (2011) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awr003 · Cited by 297
Anxious: Using the Brain to Understand and Treat Fear and Anxiety
Cecala, A. L. (2016) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 291
Chapman, H. A., & Anderson, A. K. (2012) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06369.x · Cited by 271
The subjective experience of emotion: a fearful view
LeDoux, J. E., & Hofmann, S. G. (2018) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.09.011 · Cited by 268
Dopamine Dysregulation Syndrome: An Overview of its Epidemiology, Mechanisms and Management
OʼSullivan, S. S., Evans, A. H., & Lees, A. J. (2009) · CNS Drugs · doi:10.2165/00023210-200923020-00005 · Cited by 265
The implicit revolution: Reconceiving the relation between conscious and unconscious.
Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (2017) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/amp0000238 · Cited by 261
Reynolds, S. M., & Berridge, K. C. (2008) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn2061 · Cited by 244
Self-citationFreud, S. (1959) · The American Journal of the Medical Sciences · doi:10.1097/00000441-195912000-00018 · Cited by 224
Damásio, A. R. (2004) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511806582.004 · Cited by 223
Images of desire: cognitive models of craving.
May, J., Andrade, J., Panabokke, N., & Kavanagh, D. (2004) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658210444000061 · Cited by 222
Peciña, S., & Berridge, K. C. (2013) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/ejn.12174 · Cited by 216
Self-citationOpioid and orexin hedonic hotspots in rat orbitofrontal cortex and insula
Castro, D. C., & Berridge, K. C. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1705753114 · Cited by 214
Self-citationNeural Mechanisms of Incentive Salience in Naturalistic Human Vision
Hickey, C., & Peelen, M. V. (2015) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2014.12.049 · Cited by 212
Mesolimbic Dopamine and the Regulation of Motivated Behavior
Salamone, J. D., Pardo, M., Yohn, S. E., López-Cruz, L., SanMiguel, N., & Correa, M. (2015) · Current Topics in Behavioral Neurosciences · doi:10.1007/7854_2015_383 · Cited by 204
Hunger neurons drive feeding through a sustained, positive reinforcement signal.
Chen, Y., Lin, Y.-C., Zimmerman, C. A., Essner, R. A., & Knight, Z. A. (2016) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.18640 · Cited by 196
Predictors of impulsivity and reward seeking behavior with dopamine agonists
Ondo, W. G., & Lai, D. (2007) · Parkinsonism & Related Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.parkreldis.2007.05.006 · Cited by 195
High Dose Pimozide Does Not Block Amphetamine-Induced Euphoria in Normal Volunteers
Brauer, L. H. (1997) · Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0091-3057(96)00240-7 · Cited by 194
Politis, M., Loane, C., Wu, K., O’Sullivan, S. S., Woodhead, Z., Kiferle, L., Lawrence, A. D., Lees, A. J., & Piccini, P. (2013) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/aws326 · Cited by 191
The dopamine synapse and the notion of ‘pleasure centers’ in the brain
Wise, R. A. (1980) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/0166-2236(80)90035-1 · Cited by 186
Anhedonia and Emotional Experience in Schizophrenia: Neural and Behavioral Indicators
Dowd, E. C., & Barch, D. M. (2010) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.10.020 · Cited by 184
Basic emotions or ur-emotions?
Frijda, N. H., & Parrott, W. G. (2011) · Emotion Review · doi:10.1177/1754073911410742 · Cited by 180
Individual variation in resisting temptation: Implications for addiction
Saunders, B. T., & Robinson, T. E. (2013) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.02.008 · Cited by 177
Neurobiological basis of individual variation in stimulus-reward learning
Flagel, S. B., & Robinson, T. E. (2017) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.12.004 · Cited by 165
Intragastric reinforcement effect.
Holman, G. L. (1969) · Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0028233 · Cited by 164
Herzog, J., Reiff, J., Krack, P., Witt, K., Schrader, B., Müller, D., & Deuschl, G. (2003) · Movement Disorders · doi:10.1002/mds.10530 · Cited by 163
The Central Amygdala Nucleus is Critical for Incubation of Methamphetamine Craving
Li, X., Zeric, T., Kambhampati, S., Bossert, J. M., & Shaham, Y. (2014) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2014.320 · Cited by 163
Animal models for screening anxiolytic-like drugs: a perspective.
Bourin, M. (2015) · Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience · doi:10.31887/dcns.2015.17.3/mbourin · Cited by 163
Richard, J. M., & Berridge, K. C. (2011) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1339-11.2011 · Cited by 158
Self-citationDisgust sensitivity predicts the insula and pallidal response to pictures of disgusting foods.
Calder, A. J., Beaver, J. D., Davis, M. H., Van Ditzhuijzen, J., Keane, J., & Lawrence, A. D. (2007) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05604.x · Cited by 154
The Neurochemistry of Behavior
Panksepp, J. (1986) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.37.020186.000453 · Cited by 154
Appetitive motivation predicts the neural response to facial signals of aggression.
Beaver, J. D., Lawrence, A. D., Passamonti, L., & Calder, A. J. (2008) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0033-08.2008 · Cited by 152
The evolutionary emergence of what we call “emotions”
Frijda, N. H. (2016) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699931.2016.1145106 · Cited by 149
Dopamine, effort-based choice, and behavioral economics: basic and translational research.
Salamone, J. D., Correa, M., Yang, J.-H., Rotolo, R., & Presby, R. (2018) · Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00052 · Cited by 142
Emotional memories are not all created equal: evidence for selective memory enhancement.
Anderson, A. K., Yamaguchi, Y., Grabski, W., & Lacka, D. (2006) · Learning & Memory · doi:10.1101/lm.388906 · Cited by 141 · cited 1×
“Of course, subliminally seeing emotional facial expressions is not equivalent to inducing the corresponding full emotion (Adolphs et al., 2005; Anderson et al., 2006).”
BackgroundRay, N. J., Miyasaki, J. M., Zurowski, M., Ko, J. H., Cho, S. S., Pellecchia, G., Antonelli, F., Houle, S., Lang, A. E., & Strafella, A. P. (2012) · Neurobiology of Disease · doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2012.06.021 · Cited by 131
A systematic review of impulse control disorders in Parkinson’s disease.
Callesen, M. B., Scheel-Krüger, J., Kringelbach, M. L., & Møller, A. (2013) · Journal of Parkinson s Disease · doi:10.3233/jpd-120165 · Cited by 130
Self‐Administration of Cocaine by Humans: A Laboratory Perspective
Fischman, M. W., & Foltin, R. W. (2007) · Novartis Foundation symposium · doi:10.1002/9780470514245.ch10 · Cited by 127
A GREAT CRAVING FOR SALT BY A CHILD WITH CORTICO-ADRENAL INSUFFICIENCY
Wilkins, L., & Richter, C. P. (1940) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1940.62810100001011 · Cited by 124
Ho, C., & Berridge, K. C. (2014) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/ejn.12720 · Cited by 124
Self-citationBiobehavior of the human love of salt.
Leshem, M. (2009) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.07.007 · Cited by 122
The Case for Compulsive Shopping as an Addiction
Hartston, H. J. (2012) · Journal of Psychoactive Drugs · doi:10.1080/02791072.2012.660110 · Cited by 119
The effects of amygdala lesions on conditioned stimulus- potentiated eating in rats.
Holland, P. C., Petrovich, G. D., & Gallagher, M. (2002) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0031-9384(02)00688-1 · Cited by 117
A comparison of benzodiazepine, serotonin, and dopamine agents in the taste-reactivity paradigm
Treit, D., & Berridge, K. C. (1990) · Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior · doi:10.1016/0091-3057(90)90011-6 · Cited by 116
Self-citationFaure, A., Richard, J. M., & Berridge, K. C. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0011223 · Cited by 114
Self-citationReward effects of food via stomach fistula compared with those of food via mouth.
Miller, N. E., & Kessen, M. L. (1952) · Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0060113 · Cited by 111
Kruglanski, A. W., Chernikova, M., Rosenzweig, E., & Kopetz, C. (2014) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0037013 · Cited by 110
Sweet liking in patients with Parkinson’s disease.
Sienkiewicz-Jarosz, H., Scinska, A., Swiecicki, L., Lipczynska-Lojkowska, W., Kuran, W., Ryglewicz, D., Kolaczkowski, M., Samochowiec, J., & Bienkowski, P. (2013) · Journal of the Neurological Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jns.2013.03.005 · Cited by 103
Swanson, L. W. (2005) · The Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.20733 · Cited by 98
Taste responses in patients with Parkinson’s disease.
Sienkiewicz-Jarosz, H. (2005) · Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp.2003.033373 · Cited by 98
Septal stimulation for the initiation of heterosexual behavior in a homosexual male
Moan, C. E., & Heath, R. (1972) · Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/0005-7916(72)90029-8 · Cited by 86
When scientific paradigms lead to tunnel vision: lessons from the study of fear
Paré, D., & Quirk, G. J. (2017) · npj Science of Learning · doi:10.1038/s41539-017-0007-4 · Cited by 83
Striatal dopamine release codes uncertainty in pathological gambling
Linnet, J., Mouridsen, K., Peterson, E., Møller, A., Doudet, D. J., & Gjedde, A. (2012) · Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging · doi:10.1016/j.pscychresns.2012.04.012 · Cited by 82
Animal Models of Anxiety and Anxiolytic Drug Action
Treit, D., Engin, E., & McEown, K. (2009) · Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · doi:10.1007/7854_2009_17 · Cited by 79
Regulatory drinking in rats with permanent access to a bitter fluid source
Nicolaı̈dis, S., & Rowland, N. E. (1975) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/0031-9384(75)90076-1 · Cited by 79
A cognitivist's reply to Zajonc on emotion and cognition.
Lazarus, R. S. (1981) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.36.2.222 · Cited by 78
Coss, R. G., Owings, D. H., & Owings, D. H. (1978) · Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie · doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.1978.tb00268.x · Cited by 75
Levels of Thought and Levels of Emotion
Ellsworth, P. C. (1994) · eYLS (Yale Law School) · Cited by 70
Schwarz (1999) · doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000002002 · Cited by 67
Computer Power and Human Reason: From Judgment to Calculation.
Rising, G. R., Weizenbaum, J., & Freeman, W. (1978) · American Mathematical Monthly · doi:10.2307/2321366 · Cited by 63
Hedonics: The Cognitive–Motivational Interface
Dickinson, A., & Balleine, B. W. (2009) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195331028.003.0006 · Cited by 62
The Neurobiology of Desire: Dopamine and the Regulation of Mood and Motivational States in Humans
Leyton, M. (2009) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195331028.003.0015 · Cited by 59
Crack cocaine use due to dopamine agonist therapy in Parkinson disease
Friedman, J. H., & Chang, V. C. (2013) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0b013e318296e9d5 · Cited by 58
The dopamine augmenter L-DOPA does not affect positive mood in healthy human volunteers.
Liggins, J., Pihl, R. O., Benkelfat, C., & Leyton, M. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0028370 · Cited by 58
Learning and the motivation to eat: forebrain circuitry.
Petrovich, G. D. (2011) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.04.059 · Cited by 57
Feelings: What Are They & How Does the Brain Make Them?
LeDoux, J. E. (2015) · Daedalus · doi:10.1162/daed_a_00319 · Cited by 55
Functions of the dopaminergic innervation of the nucleus accumbens.
Gray, J. A., Kumari, V., Lawrence, N., & Young, A. M. J. (1999) · Psychobiology · doi:10.3758/bf03332116 · Cited by 52
To Be Happy and to Know It: The Experience and Meta-Awareness of Pleasure
Schooler, J. W., & Mauss, I. B. (2009) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195331028.003.0016 · Cited by 52
Threat sensitivity, incentive sensitivity, and the experience of relief.
Carver, C. S. (2009) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00540.x · Cited by 50
BOLD responses in reward regions to hypothetical and imaginary monetary rewards
Miyapuram, K. P., Tobler, P. N., Gregorios-Pippas, L., & Schultz, W. (2011) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.029 · Cited by 46
Cocaine addiction as a homeostatic reinforcement learning disorder.
Keramati, M., Durand, A., Girardeau, P., Gutkin, B., & Ahmed, S. H. (2017) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000046 · Cited by 44
Basic Emotions: A Reconstruction
Mason, W. A., & Capitanio, J. P. (2012) · Emotion Review · doi:10.1177/1754073912439763 · Cited by 38
Affective perception and imagery: a NIRS study.
Köchel, A., Plichta, M. M., Schäfer, A., Leutgeb, V., Scharmüller, W., Fallgatter, A. J., & Schienle, A. (2011) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.03.006 · Cited by 37
Effects of water deprivation on random activity.
Campbell, B. A. (1960) · Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0044975 · Cited by 29
Disrupting reconsolidation: memory erasure or blunting of emotional/motivational value?
Cogan, E. S., Shapses, M. A., Robinson, T. E., & Tronson, N. C. (2019) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/s41386-018-0082-0 · Cited by 25
Jauregui-Lobera (2013) · PubMed · doi:10.3305/nh.2012.27.6.6043 · Cited by 23
Neal E. Miller: Selected papers,
Miller, N. E. (1971) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 16
Poisoning and conditioned drinking.
Mineka, S., Selligman, M. E., Hetrick, M., & Zuelzer, K. (1972) · Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0032825 · Cited by 15
Some issues for a cognitive theory of emotion.
Clore, G. L., & Ortony, A. (1984) · Cited by 10
Humoral factors controlling food intake in dogs.
Lh, T., Rl, S., Stellar, E., & Wampler, S. N. (1975) · PubMed · Cited by 9
Flagged first, then by citations
4 of the 161 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- Clore, 1994, Why emotions are never unconscious, The Nature of Emotion: Fundamental Questions, 285
- Frijda, 2007, Universal The Laws of Emotion.
- Hull, 1951, Essentials of Behavior.
- Huston, 1972, Classical conditioning of consummatory behavior, Control Mechanisms of Drinking, 165
- Miller, 1973, How the project started, Brain Stimulation and Motivation: Research and Commentary, 53
- Olds, 1973, The discovery of reward systems in the brain, Brain Stimulation and Motivation: research and commentary, 81
- Popper, 1972, The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Impression Revised
- Rozin, 2008, Disgust, Handbook of Emotions, 757
- Salamone, 1991, Behavioral pharmacology of dopamine systems: a new synthesis, The Mesolimbic Dopamine System : From Motivation to Action, 599
- Titchener, 1902, A Primer of Psychology. Rev.
- Toates, 1986, Motivational Systems.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Circuits and functions of the lateral habenula in health and in disease
Hu, H., Cui, Y., & Yang, Y. (2020) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41583-020-0292-4 · Cited by 489
“Liking” and “wanting” in eating and food reward: Brain mechanisms and clinical implications
Morales, I., & Berridge, K. C. (2020) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2020.113152 · Cited by 346
Self-citationGruber, M. J., & Ranganath, C. (2019) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2019.10.003 · Cited by 302
Motivation-Achievement Cycles in Learning: a Literature Review and Research Agenda
Vu, T., Magis-Weinberg, L., Jansen, B. R. J., van Atteveldt, N., Janssen, T. W. P., Lee, N. C., van der Maas, H. L. J., Raijmakers, M. E. J., Sachisthal, M. S. M., & Meeter, M. (2022) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-021-09616-7 · Cited by 224
The nuts and bolts of animal emotion
Kremer, L., Holkenborg, S. E. J. K., Reimert, I., Bolhuis, J. E., & Webb, L. E. (2020) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.01.028 · Cited by 219
Metadata
- Authors
- Berridge, K. C.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- Corresponding author
- Berridge, Kent C.
- ORCID
- Berridge, Kent C.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Psychology
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2018-09-07
- Volume
- 9
- Pages
- 1647-1647
- ISSN
- 1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6137142
- OpenAlex
- W2890468836
- Semantic Scholar
- 9f76bc3d0d033c883df6ee118d6f030743fa47a2
- Cited by
- 273
- References
- 161
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 3.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (DA015188, MH63649)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Cognitive Science and Education Research
- Keywords
- emotions, motivation, incentive salience, want, incentive motivation, drive reduction, reward, dopamine, mesocorticolimbic system, anhedonia, depression, schizophrenia, paranoia, fear, disgust, animal emotions, subjective feelings
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-08, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-08 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review