Cited by 933Essential Oils and Antimicrobial ActivityEdible Oils Quality and AnalysisMedicinal Plant Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 155 of the 166 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 233 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Antioxidant and Anti-Inflammatory Activities of Essential Oils: A Short Review

Open access
Miguel, Maria Graça·2010·Molecules

Abstract

Essential oils are complex mixtures isolated from aromatic plants which may possess antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities of interest in thye food and cosmetic industries as well as in the human health field. In this work, a review was done on the most recent publications concerning their antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities. At the same time a survey of the methods generally used for the evaluation of antioxidant activity and some of the mechanisms involved in the anti-inflammatory activities of essential oils are also reported.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This short review summarizes essential oils as complex aromatic plant mixtures with antioxidant and anti-inflammatory potential, and surveys the in vitro methods used to evaluate these activities. It concludes that activity depends strongly on chemical composition and assay method, and that chemical variability plus unresolved synergism/antagonism limit practical use.

Key findings

  • Essential oils are complex mixtures whose major components can constitute up to 85%, with remaining components in trace amounts; composition varies with harvesting time, climate/agronomic conditions, plant development, plant part, and extraction method.
  • Antioxidant activity is documented mainly as prevention of lipid peroxidation, free-radical scavenging, and rarely metal chelation, but results are method-dependent: e.g., *Thymus vulgaris*, *Eugenia caryophyllus*, and *Ocimum basilicum* oils had activity comparable to α-tocopherol in a conjugated diene assay; β-thujone-rich *Artemisia herba-alba* oil showed 12.5% inhibition versus BHA at 89.2%; carvacrol-rich *Origanum acutidens* oil reached 65% inhibition versus BHT at 100%.
  • In a screen of 248 essential oils by DPPH, only 17 species had effective antioxidant activity, mainly from Lamiaceae; active compounds detected by DPPH/TLC included phenols, non-phenols, oxygenated, and non-oxygenated compounds.
  • Anti-inflammatory activity is attributed to effects on arachidonic acid metabolism, cytokine production, and pro-inflammatory gene expression; examples include 1,8-cineole inhibiting LTB4 and PGE2, citral preventing IκBα degradation and reducing nuclear p50 NF-κB, carvacrol activating PPARγ and suppressing COX-2, and α-pinene inhibiting NF-κB/p65 nuclear translocation.

Methods

  • Narrative review of recent publications on the antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities of essential oils, plus a survey of methods for evaluating antioxidant activity and mechanisms of anti-inflammatory action.
  • No primary experimental design, sample, or statistical analysis is reported; the paper synthesizes cited studies using assays such as DPPH, ABTS/TEAC, FRAP, TBARS, β-carotene bleaching, Rancimat, chelating, hydroxyl-radical, and superoxide-anion scavenging, and anti-inflammatory models including LPS-stimulated macrophages, carrageenan paw oedema, and TNBS-induced colitis.
  • The review also cites an artificial neural network study that used about 30 components from 80 described as antioxidant to predict activity in DPPH and linoleic acid models.

Limitations

  • The paper states that essential oil uses can be hampered by chemical variability due to harvesting time, climatic and agronomic conditions, vegetative development, plant part, and extraction type.
  • The paper states that synergism and antagonism studies must be developed, and that the artificial neural network work tested only two models, so much more needs to be done.
  • Evident from the text: as a short narrative review, it does not report a systematic search strategy, quality appraisal, or quantitative synthesis, and its conclusions rely on heterogeneous cited studies using different substrates, assays, and endpoints.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/molecules15129252

Cites

155 of 155 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 of 233 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

Show all 75 claims

  • Probably not a substantial claim. 27
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 101
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 3
116 of 116

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Ridolfia claim cites a different plant

    Minor

    The text attributes a result for Ridolfia segetum to reference [74], but that reference is titled as a study of Zataria multiflora.

  • Plant genus differs from the cited young-leaf study

    Minor

    The discussion identifies the plant as Ageratum scoparia, whereas reference [83] identifies the young- and mature-leaf study as Artemisia scoparia.

  • Lauraceae oil is assigned different genera

    Minor

    The discussion names the third Lauraceae oil Persea gamblei in one place and Dodecadenia gamblei in another.

  • Amomum TBARS claim cites an Olea study

    Minor

    The Amomum tsao-ko TBARS result is attributed to [70], whose reference entry concerns Olea europaea rather than Amomum.

  • Hammer study has conflicting publication years

    Minor

    The discussion dates the cited Hammer et al. study to 2000, but reference [108] dates it to 2008.

5 of 5

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 166 references

11 of the 166 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Cavaleiro, C.M.F. (2001). Óleos essenciais de Juniperus de Portugal. [PhD Thesis, Universidade de Coimbra].
  2. Syamsir, D.R.B. (2009). Essential oils and biological activities of three selected wild Alpinia species. [Master thesis, Institute of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Sciences, University of Malaya].
  3. Koppel, 2008, Anti-inflammatory effects of thyme essential oil in mice, Acta Vet. Brno, 77, 327, 10.2754/avb200877030327 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 601–700 of 932

Metadata

Authors
Miguel, M. G.
Affiliations
University of Algarve (PT)
Corresponding author
Miguel, Maria Graça
Venue
Molecules
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2010-12-15
Volume
15
Issue
12
Pages
9252-9287
ISSN
1420-3049 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2068524720
Cited by
933
References
166
Citations by year
2026: 75 · 2025: 65 · 2024: 84 · 2023: 91 · 2022: 101 · 2021: 74 · 2020: 74 · 2019: 59 · 2018: 57 · 2017: 66 · 2016: 52 · 2015: 44 · 2014: 38 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 17
FWCI
1.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecules (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Edible Oils Quality and Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Medicinal Plant Research
Keywords
essential oils, antioxidant activity, anti-inflammatory activity, anti-inflammatory mechanism, aromatic plants, food industry applications
MeSH terms
Animals, Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Antioxidants, Humans, Oils, Volatile

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review