The DOI matches its Crossref record; 381 of the 385 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 90 of the 228 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
The tropical atlantic observing system
Open accessAbstract
The tropical Atlantic is home to multiple coupled climate variations covering a wide range of timescales and impacting societally relevant phenomena such as continental rainfall, Atlantic hurricane activity, oceanic biological productivity, and atmospheric circulation in the equatorial Pacific. The tropical Atlantic also connects the southern and northern branches of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation and receives freshwater input from some of the world's largest rivers. To address these diverse, unique, and interconnected research challenges, a rich network of ocean observations has developed, building on the backbone of the Prediction and Research Moored Array in the Tropical Atlantic (PIRATA). This network has evolved naturally over time and out of necessity in order to address the most important outstanding scientific questions and to improve predictions of tropical Atlantic severe weather and global climate variability and change. The tropical Atlantic observing system is motivated by goals to understand and better predict phenomena such as tropical Atlantic interannual to decadal variability and climate change; multidecadal variability and its links to the meridional overturning circulation; air-sea fluxes of CO2 and their implications for the fate of anthropogenic CO2; the Amazon River plume and its interactions with biogeochemistry, vertical mixing, and hurricanes; the highly productive eastern boundary and equatorial upwelling systems; and oceanic oxygen minimum zones, their impacts on biogeochemical cycles and marine ecosystems, and their feedbacks to climate. Past success of the tropical Atlantic observing system is the result of an international commitment to sustained observations and scientific cooperation, a willingness to evolve with changing research and monitoring needs, and a desire to share data openly with the scientific community and operational centers. The observing system must continue to evolve in order to meet an expanding set of research priorities and operational challenges. This paper discusses the tropical Atlantic observing system, including emerging scientific questions that demand sustained ocean observations, the potential for further integration of the observing system, and the requirements for sustaining and enhancing the tropical Atlantic observing system.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This review synthesizes societal drivers, scientific drivers, and the existing tropical Atlantic observing system, concluding that sustained and expanded observations are needed for climate prediction, biogeochemistry, ecosystems, and extreme weather. It identifies critical gaps in the current system and provides readiness-level recommendations for future enhancements.
Key findings
Tropical Atlantic variability affects rainfall, hurricanes, biogeochemistry, and ecosystems; examples include the 2005, 2010, and 2017 Atlantic hurricane seasons with 28, 19, and 17 cyclones of at least tropical storm strength, respectively, and eight Atlantic hurricanes since 2005 causing at least $25 billion in damages. The tropical Atlantic releases about 0.10 Pg C yr⁻¹ in the 18°S–18°N region, receives about 25% of global riverine freshwater discharge from the Amazon, Congo, and Orinoco, and yielded approximately 10 million tons of seafood in the Central and South Atlantic in 2016 (from 87.2 million tons of global marine capture production). The observing system has progressed over 20 years, with PIRATA as the backbone (initiated 1997, 18 moorings; T-Flex transition began 2015, with 10 upgraded and eight remaining), complemented by Argo, GO-SHIP, SOOP, surface drifters, boundary current arrays, and satellites. Persistent model biases remain: a cool SST bias in the northern tropical Atlantic can cause a 65% underrepresentation of Atlantic hurricane activity, the Benguela warm SST bias exceeds 2.5°C in the CMIP5 multi-model average, and net surface heat flux standard deviation exceeds 20 W m⁻² across 12 products, with downward heat input overestimated by 5–20 W m⁻².
Methods
Design: review/synthesis paper; no new primary data collection or analysis is described. Data/sample: existing literature and observing system components, including PIRATA, Argo, GO-SHIP, SOOP, surface drifters, boundary current arrays, and satellite observations, with figures and tables summarizing system elements and gaps. Analysis: qualitative synthesis of societal drivers, science drivers, strengths and weaknesses of the current observing system, and expert recommendations with readiness levels.
Limitations
Stated: many open questions remain about tropical Atlantic variability mechanisms, air–sea feedbacks, model biases, and ecosystem/biogeochemical responses; observations are sparse, especially for biogeochemical and biological parameters, the deep ocean, off-equatorial mixing, and the northwestern and southeastern tropical Atlantic. Stated: carbon trends remain unclear because of short records and high natural variability, acidification impacts are poorly known, and coupled model biases have seen little improvement over two decades. Evident from the text: as a review, it does not test hypotheses or provide new empirical results; its recommendations are expert synthesis with readiness levels rather than validated outcomes.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
52 No basis given · 44 Partly supported · 41 No full text of the sources · 38 Own interpretation · 14 Supported · 11 Supported so far · 11 Sources not found · 11 Not checked yet · 3 Own result · 2 Couldn’t confirm · accuracy not yet measured
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“The magnitude of hurricane RI (increase in maximum wind speed of at least 25 kt in 24 h) has increased in the central and eastern tropical Atlantic since the 1980s (Balaguru et al., 2018).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Tropical Cyclones
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Balaguru et al., 2018 source
The paper’s Plain Language Summary states that rapid intensification is an increase of at least 25 knots in 24 hours and that its magnitude increased in the central and eastern tropical Atlantic during 1986–2015. Section 3.2 also states that the magnitude of hurricane RI increased in that region over the same period. (LLM, conf=0.94)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“The tropical Atlantic is the second largest source, after the tropical Pacific, of oceanic CO 2 to the atmosphere, releasing about 0.10 Pg C yr -1 in the 18 • S-18 • N region (Landschützer et al., 2014).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Biogeochemistry
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Landschützer et al., 2014 source
Table 3 (section 8, page not specified) reports a 1998–2011 mean flux of 0.10 ± 0.06 Pg C yr⁻¹ from the Atlantic between 18°S and 18°N. Its listed fluxes place the tropical Pacific above the tropical Atlantic, supporting the stated ranking by estimated flux. (LLM, conf=0.94)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Since the 1970s there has been an upward trend in the year-to-year variability of Amazon River discharge, following a period with no trend during 1904 through the 1960’s (Satyamurty et al., 2013;Barichivich et al., 2018).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Rainfall
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Satyamurty et al., 2013 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Section 3.2, paragraphs 13–14, reports that the annual range of Negro River water levels at Manaus increased after 1970, with no significant long-range trend from 1904 to the late 1960s. That supports the stated timing, but the measured trend is in the range between high and low water levels, not year-to-year variability of Amazon River discharge. (LLM, conf=0.87)
- Partly supportedcites Barichivich et al., 2018 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results section (page unavailable) reports that severe-flood frequency increased from around 1970, which supports a related increase in hydrological extremes. It does not establish an upward trend in year-to-year discharge variability or a trend-free period from 1904 through the 1960s. The Methods section says the study analyzed water levels rather than deriving discharge estimates. (LLM, conf=0.84)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“However, during 2005-2008 the Amazon was a net carbon source due to drought-stressed and dying trees, combined with increased occurrence of fires (Zeng et al., 2008;Yang et al., 2018).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Rainfall
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Zeng et al., 2008 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Section 3 (page not provided) reports that fires across the Amazon basin were more than twice as frequent in 2005 as the average of the preceding seven years, and says drought made forests more prone to burning. It does not establish that the Amazon was a net carbon source, attribute carbon emissions to stressed or dying trees, or document those conditions throughout 2005–2008. (LLM, conf=0.88)
- Partly supportedcites Yang et al., 2018 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results (Biomass and carbon changes) report post-2005 carbon losses, a shift to a carbon source in intact southern forests, and emissions from fires. But they do not show an increased occurrence of fires, and the Discussion cautions that the estimated drought-related loss is a decline in the forest carbon sink, not its absolute magnitude. The paper therefore does not establish that the entire Amazon was a net carbon source throughout 2005–2008 for the reasons stated. (LLM, conf=0.88)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“Summer equatorial variability associated with the AZM is also highly correlated with the next winter's ENSO (Polo et al., 2008;Rodríguez-Fonseca et al., 2009;Ding et al., 2012;Keenlyside et al., 2013;Martín-Rey et al., 2015).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Modes of Variability and Tropical Cyclones
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Polo et al., 2008 source
In “Equatorial Atlantic SST–Guinean Rainfall Mode: Air–Sea Interactions” (page not available), the paper reports that the maximum lagged correlation occurs when a warm equatorial Atlantic mode in summer precedes Pacific La Niña by 6–8 months, in the following winter. This supports the stated summer-to-next-winter association, specifically for the 1979–2002 period studied. (LLM, conf=0.90)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Rodríguez-Fonseca et al., 2009 source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Ding et al., 2012 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“Significant trends in tropical Atlantic SST, surface salinity, upper-ocean heat content, winds, cloudiness, and rainfall have emerged in the past decade (Tokinaga and Xie, 2011;Durack et al., 2012;Servain et al., 2014).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Modes of Variability and Tropical Cyclones
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Tokinaga and Xie, 2011 source
- Could not verifycites Durack et al., 2012 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The available indexed passages are UNT Digital Library navigation and bibliographic metadata, with no paper section or page containing the findings. Searches for tropical Atlantic trends and the listed variables found no passage addressing whether significant trends emerged in the past decade. The available copy therefore cannot verify the claim. (LLM, conf=0.74)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Servain et al., 2014 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“A warm phase of the AZM shifts the intertropical convergence zone (ITCZ) anomalously to the south during June-August, increasing rainfall over the Gulf of Guinea (Figure 4A; Janicot et al., 1998;Okumura and Xie, 2004;Polo et al., 2008;Joly and Voldoire, 2010;Losada et al., 2010;Rodríguez-Fonseca et al., 2011, 2015).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Modes of Variability and Tropical Cyclones
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Janicot et al., 1998 source
- Not matchedcites Okumura and Xie, 2004
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Partly supportedcites Polo et al., 2008 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction (page unavailable) links warm Atlantic conditions to wet years over the Gulf of Guinea and describes increased precipitation south of the ITCZ’s usual latitude. The SST–precipitation coupled modes section (page unavailable) also associates positive equatorial Atlantic SST anomalies with increased summer rainfall along the Gulf of Guinea coast. Our copy does not establish that the warm phase causes the ITCZ itself to shift south specifically during June–August; the paper analyzes June–September rainfall. (LLM, conf=0.85)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“Atlantic Multidecadal Variability (AMV; Kerr, 2000) modulates Sahel rainfall through its control of the Atlantic ITCZ (Knight et al., 2006;Zhang and Delworth, 2006;Mohino et al., 2011;Dieppois et al., 2015).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Modes of Variability and Tropical Cyclones
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Knight et al., 2006 source
Section 3 (Sahel Rainfall) says that warm AMO phases shift the Atlantic-sector ITCZ northward, increasing Sahel rainfall, while the opposite phase shifts it southward and reduces rainfall. Section 6 (Discussion and Conclusions) reiterates that reduced Sahel rainfall in negative AMO phases is linked to southward shifts of the mean ITCZ. (LLM, conf=0.94)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Zhang and Delworth, 2006 source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Mohino et al., 2011 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“There is robust forcing of the tropical Atlantic from the tropical Pacific on interannual and longer timescales (Enfield and Mayer, 1997;Chiang et al., 2002;Villamayor and Mohino, 2015).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Modes of Variability and Tropical Cyclones
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Enfield and Mayer, 1997 source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Chiang et al., 2002 source
- Partly supportedcites Villamayor and Mohino, 2015 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results report tropical Atlantic warming associated with the Pacific IPO in observations and simulations, which supports a link on decadal timescales. They also say the response outside the Pacific is less consistent across models; the paper does not establish robust Pacific forcing of the tropical Atlantic on interannual timescales. The robust finding concerns the IPO’s effect on Sahel rainfall. (LLM, conf=0.86)
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“This is especially true in the northwestern tropical Atlantic, where the Amazon-Orinoco plume increases salinity stratification, limiting hurricane-induced SST cooling (Figure 5; Balaguru et al., 2012;Grodsky et al., 2012b;Domingues et al., 2015).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Modes of Variability and Tropical Cyclones
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Balaguru et al., 2012 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Analysis reports that Hurricane Omar encountered barrier layers in the Caribbean and that SST cooling was substantially reduced there. The paper also explains that freshwater input can create salinity-related barrier layers, but our copy does not attribute the observed stratification to the Amazon–Orinoco plume or establish the claim specifically for the northwestern tropical Atlantic. The plume appears in a References entry, not in the paper’s account of this mechanism. (LLM, conf=0.85)
- Not matchedcites Grodsky et al., 2012b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Supportedcites Domingues et al., 2015 source
The discussion reports that salinity-induced barrier layers linked to the Amazon–Orinoco plume can reduce hurricane-driven upper-ocean cooling. The Introduction likewise says near-surface salinity stratification can reduce storm-induced SST cooling. Page numbers are not supplied in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.92)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Uncertainties in near-surface air temperature and humidity are the leading sources of uncertainties for satellite-derived products (Prytherch et al., 2015).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Processes That Affect Upper-Ocean Temperature and Salinity
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Prytherch et al., 2015 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction (page not available in our copy) says variation in near-surface humidity fields is the largest source of uncertainty in global marine latent heat flux products. It does not make the same claim about air temperature or satellite-derived products generally. (LLM, conf=0.87)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Oxygen can drop to zero in these eddies (Karstensen et al., 2015), substantially lower than the average value of 40 µmol kg -1 .”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Ocean Circulation
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Karstensen et al., 2015 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Abstract reports oxygen below 2 µmol kg⁻¹, lowest at eddy centres, and §3.1 describes the measured level as close to the threshold for anoxia—not zero. The Abstract and §3.1 also describe about 40 µmol kg⁻¹ as the region’s usual lower limit, rather than its average. (LLM, conf=0.88)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Interannual variability in the equatorial and eastern boundary circulation due to equatorial and coastally trapped waves define the propagation characteristics of warm and cold anomalies of the AZM and Benguela Niño (Lübbecke et al., 2010).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Ocean Circulation
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Lübbecke et al., 2010 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Section 3.3.2 (paragraphs 27 and 30) links interannual SST variability and the timing of warm and cold events to equatorial and coastal Kelvin-wave signals. But the Summary and Discussion (paragraphs 41 and 43) also attributes the different timing of Benguela and equatorial anomalies to thermocline depth and seasonal phase-locking; it does not establish that wave-driven circulation variability alone defines their propagation characteristics. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“Observational and modeling studies of the equatorial mixed layer heat balance have demonstrated the importance of vertical turbulent mixing for generating seasonal cooling of SST in the equatorial Atlantic (Foltz et al., 2003;Peter et al., 2006).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Processes That Affect Upper-Ocean Temperature and Salinity
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Foltz et al., 2003 source
- Supportedcites Peter et al., 2006 source
The Abstract reports seasonal equatorial mixed-layer cooling by vertical processes, strongest in June–August. Section 2.2 identifies vertical diffusion at the base of the mixed layer as the dominant contributor to that subsurface cooling, supporting the claim as attributed to this modeling study. (LLM, conf=0.89)
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“In addition to vertical mixing and lateral eddy fluxes (Fischer et al., 2013;Hahn et al., 2014), latitudinally alternating zonal jets play a dominant role in the ventilation of the Atlantic OMZs (Brandt et al., 2010(Brandt et al., , 2012)).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Ocean Circulation
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Fischer et al., 2013 source
Fischer et al. is cited for vertical mixing and lateral eddy fluxes, not for the zonal-jet claim, which has separate citations. The paper’s Abstract states that diapycnal mixing supplies oxygen to the tropical North Atlantic OMZ and that this oxygen originates from lateral advective and eddy fluxes in the overlying layer. (LLM, conf=0.93)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Hahn et al., 2014 source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Brandt et al., 2010 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“The estimation contains uncertainty, which hampers our ability to accurately quantify air-sea thermodynamic interactions and heat budgets in the tropical Atlantic (Frankignoul and Kestenare, 2005;Pinker et al., 2014;Bentamy et al., 2017).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Processes That Affect Upper-Ocean Temperature and Salinity
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Frankignoul and Kestenare, 2005 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Section 2, “The data” (page unavailable), describes noisy observations, model biases in surface heat fluxes, and discrepancies between datasets. Section 6, “Summary and conclusions” (page unavailable), cautions that model biases and inadequate algorithms may affect the results. These passages support uncertainty in flux-based estimates, but the paper does not specifically say that this hampers accurate quantification of tropical Atlantic heat budgets. (LLM, conf=0.84)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Pinker et al., 2014 source
- Partly supportedcites Bentamy et al., 2017 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction (page unavailable) says surface-flux products have biases and uncertainties and links flux accuracy to air–sea interaction studies and heat-budget closure. The Statistical Results (page unavailable) report discrepancies in tropical regions, but the passages do not establish the specific effect on quantifying heat budgets in the tropical Atlantic. (LLM, conf=0.82)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“For reanalysis fluxes, there are major uncertainties in tropical shortwave and longwave radiation associated with the long-standing problems of parameterizing tropical convective clouds and low-altitude stratocumulus clouds in reanalysis models (Trolliet et al., 2018).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Processes That Affect Upper-Ocean Temperature and Salinity
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Trolliet et al., 2018 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Nevertheless, about 30% of the oxygen consumed in the OMZs of the eastern tropical Atlantic is replenished by interior ocean mixing processes sustained through internal wave-wave interaction (Brandt et al., 2015).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Processes That Affect Upper-Ocean Temperature and Salinity
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Brandt et al., 2015 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Abstract and §9 (Summary and discussion; page not provided) say vertical mixing supplies about 20% of the oxygen needed to balance consumption in the deep eastern tropical North Atlantic OMZ, reaching about 30% only locally. The claim generalizes that local figure to the region’s OMZs. The paper does not identify internal wave–wave interaction as the process sustaining that interior mixing; §6.3 instead discusses internal waves enhanced by tide–topography interaction at the continental margin. (LLM, conf=0.90)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“On intraseasonal timescales, variability in the equatorial Atlantic is dominated by TIWs in the western and central part and by wind-driven waves in the east (Athie and Marin, 2008).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Ocean Circulation
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Athie and Marin, 2008 source
The Summary and Conclusion (§6, paragraphs 52 and 57; page unavailable) identifies two dominant intraseasonal surface signals: TIWs west of 10°W and a 10–20-day signal east of 10°W in the Gulf of Guinea. It concludes that eastern signal is locally forced by meridional wind-stress variability, supporting the citing sentence’s regional distinction. (LLM, conf=0.94)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Direct measurements of the surface heat flux have also proven valuable for diagnosing air-sea coupling in the southwestern tropical Atlantic near the Brazilian coast (Chaves and Nobre, 2004;De Almeida et al., 2007).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Processes That Affect Upper-Ocean Temperature and Salinity
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Chaves and Nobre, 2004 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Methodology (§2, ¶9) says the study used model-generated and parameterized surface heat fluxes; the AGCM Experiments (§3.1, ¶11) use those heat budgets to examine ocean–atmosphere interaction in the western South Atlantic. This supports the value of heat-flux analysis, but not the claim that direct measurements proved valuable near the Brazilian coast. (LLM, conf=0.88)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites De Almeida et al., 2007 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Moreover, there is evidence that mesoscale ocean dynamics significantly affect the tropical Atlantic Ocean and overlying atmospheric variability across a large range of time scales from daily to interannual and interdecadal (Seo et al., 2007;Chelton and Xie, 2010).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Ocean Circulation
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Seo et al., 2007 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Abstract and §4 (Summary and discussion; page numbers unavailable) support an effect of tropical Atlantic instability waves on ocean currents, wind stress and atmospheric variability at short time scales. Section 4 describes longer-term effects as possible and says they require much longer simulations; it does not establish significant effects across interannual and interdecadal time scales. (LLM, conf=0.88)
- Partly supportedcites Chelton and Xie, 2010 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The paper’s opening section (p. 52) describes mesoscale sea-surface-temperature effects on winds and feedback on ocean temperature, and its Summary and Conclusions includes Atlantic tropical-instability-wave regions. It does not establish the claimed daily-to-interannual-and-interdecadal range for tropical Atlantic oceanic and atmospheric variability; the Introduction instead describes wind responses most clearly seen over weeks and persisting for a month or longer. (LLM, conf=0.84)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“Hurricane-permitting global climate model simulations are becoming increasingly feasible (Patricola et al., 2014;Wehner et al., 2014;Walsh et al., 2015;Haarsma et al., 2016), but tend to overpredict hurricane activity if oceanic feedbacks are neglected (Zarzycki, 2016;Li and Sriver, 2018).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Predictability and Model Biases
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Zarzycki, 2016 source
- Supportedcites Li and Sriver, 2018 source
The Abstract reports that the uncoupled atmosphere-only simulation produced more storms and higher overall storm intensity than the coupled simulations. Section 4 (TC Distribution, Number, and Seasonality) also reports more intense storms in every basin than in the coupled models and observations, supporting the claim that omitting ocean feedbacks can overpredict hurricane activity. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Poor representation of the AZM in many models appears related to the under-representation of the thermocline feedback associated with an overly deep mixed layer and too weak upwelling in the eastern Atlantic (Ding et al., 2015a,b;Deppenmeier et al., 2016;Dippe et al., 2018;Jouanno et al., 2017).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Predictability and Model Biases
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Ding et al., 2015a,b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Partly supportedcites Deppenmeier et al., 2016 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Section 4.3 (page unavailable) reports that models generally underestimate the influence of subsurface heat-content anomalies on eastern Atlantic SST, and the Conclusion links poor representation of that feedback to erroneous vertical oceanic stratification. The paper does not establish an overly deep mixed layer or too-weak eastern Atlantic upwelling as the causes; the Conclusion says the subsurface errors could arise from ocean mixing and/or atmospheric forcing. (LLM, conf=0.88)
- Partly supportedcites Dippe et al., 2018 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction says biased simulations have a deeper thermocline and strongly reduced upwelling in the cold-tongue region, making the Atlantic Niño difficult to reproduce. Section 6 links the model bias to impaired feedback, but identifies the KCM’s main problem as the SST–wind relationship. The paper does not attribute that impairment to an overly deep mixed layer; thermocline depth is not mixed-layer depth. (LLM, conf=0.88)
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Many data products poorly represent the atmospheric and oceanic circulations in the region (Large and Yeager, 2008;Patricola and Chang, 2017;Tchipalanga et al., 2018), underscoring the need for updated products at higher resolution.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Predictability and Model Biases
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Large and Yeager, 2008 source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Patricola and Chang, 2017 source
- Partly supportedcites Tchipalanga et al., 2018 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Summary and Discussion (page not available) reports substantial biases in simulated ocean-current velocity structures and upwelling strength, as well as large salinity biases in several ocean reanalysis products. It does not establish that data products also poorly represent atmospheric circulation in the Benguela region. (LLM, conf=0.85)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“The large-scale meteorology that affects low clouds in this region is influenced by strong coupling between the Atlantic basin and neighboring continents (Adebiyi et al., 2015;Adebiyi and Zuidema, 2016).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Predictability and Model Biases
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Adebiyi et al., 2015 source
The Abstract describes linked changes in a southern African anticyclone and the South Atlantic anticyclone that transport continental air offshore and alter stability over the stratocumulus deck. Section 6, “Spatial patterns as a function of aerosol loading” (page not available), likewise links Atlantic circulation to temperature and moisture advection from the continent. Together, these support the claim that land–ocean meteorological interactions affect the region’s low clouds. (LLM, conf=0.88)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Adebiyi and Zuidema, 2016 source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Based on reliable SST observations, we know that the Angola current and the associated ABF are placed too far south in GCMs by about 10 • of latitude (Xu et al., 2014a;Koseki et al., 2018).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Predictability and Model Biases
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Xu et al., 2014a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Partly supportedcites Koseki et al., 2018 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Section 2.2 reports that the observed Angola and Benguela currents meet near 15°S, while NorESM places the front at 24°S—roughly 9° too far south—and simulates a stronger southward Angola Current. This supports the approximate displacement for NorESM, but not the claim that GCMs generally displace the current and front by about 10°. (LLM, conf=0.87)
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“This assumption does not account for the intense microbial activity, which may foster OM degradation or remineralisation (Bretagnon et al., 2018).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Biogeochemistry, Ecosystems, and Pollution
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Bretagnon et al., 2018 source
The Introduction contrasts the expectation that low oxygen preserves organic matter with the possibility that intense microbial activity induces efficient remineralisation. The Abstract likewise says that OMZs would be expected to foster preservation, but their microbial activity should enhance degradation. (LLM, conf=0.94)
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“From an uncoupled ocean perspective, there is also a strong impact from water mass observations over the full water column, which have been shown to improve reanalysis fields locally by several units in temperature and salinity (Oke et al., 2015;Turpin et al., 2016;Gasparin et al., 2018).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Data Assimilation
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Oke et al., 2015 source
- Partly supportedcites Turpin et al., 2016 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Conclusion reports that assimilating Argo observations improves temperature and salinity analyses and reduces observation–forecast differences; §3.1 finds locally substantial effects. But the study covers profiles from the surface to 2000 m, not the full water column, and its reported differences are around 1 °C and tenths of a psu, not several units of both temperature and salinity. (LLM, conf=0.88)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Gasparin et al., 2018 source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“For instance, the impact of surface pressure is one order of magnitude larger than the impact of wind measured on the same buoys.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Data Assimilation
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites Poli (2018) sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Data and methodology passage (p. 2) identifies PIRATA buoys with barometers and buoys for which only wind observations were assimilated. The available Results passage discusses forecast impact but stops before any pressure-versus-wind comparison. Searches for the claimed order-of-magnitude difference and pressure-to-wind impact ratio found no passage that establishes it. (LLM, conf=0.70)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Could not verify
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“The assimilation of PIRATA data was also found to improve significantly the intraseasonal variability of upper-ocean temperature (Belyaev et al., 2001), while the impact on seasonal to longer-range prediction systems needs to be investigated and quantified in more detail.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Data Assimilation
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Belyaev et al., 2001 source
The numerical experiments and results (Section 4; page unavailable) compare PIRATA temperature assimilation with a model run without assimilation. They report significantly smaller temperature-error variance after assimilation over the course of a month, including for temperatures averaged over the upper 500 m, supporting the claimed improvement in intraseasonal upper-ocean temperature variability. (LLM, conf=0.90)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“From a NWP perspective, Poli (2018) analyzed the impact of observations on the ECMWF operational data assimilation scheme and showed that surface pressure measurements from PIRATA buoys have a higher positive impact per datum than many other types of observations (satellite, upper-air, land surface, or sea surface other than buoys).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Data Assimilation
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Poli (2018) sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction (pp. 1–2) says Poli analyzed PIRATA observations in ECMWF’s operational system. The Results say sea-surface observations had a larger share of forecast improvement than their share of observation counts, but the available passage does not establish that PIRATA surface-pressure measurements had a higher positive impact per datum than the listed observation types. (LLM, conf=0.76)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Interannual variability of air-sea CO 2 fluxes is closely linked to climate variability (Lefèvre et al., 2013;Ibánhez et al., 2017).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Biogeochemistry, Ecosystems, and Pollution
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Lefèvre et al., 2013 source
The Conclusions (§7, paragraph 49) explicitly link climate variability with CO₂ exchange across the air–sea interface. They identify the 2010 El Niño teleconnection and associated rainfall reduction as drivers of increased tropical Atlantic CO₂ flux, supporting the cited background statement about interannual variability. (LLM, conf=0.88)
- Supportedcites Ibánhez et al., 2017 source
In Results and Discussion, under “Basin-scale anomalous sea-air CO2 exchange in 2010” (page not available), the paper links climate modes to SST anomalies and says these strongly affect sea-air CO2 exchange in the tropical and subtropical North Atlantic. The discussion of physical contributors also identifies SST and wind anomalies as the main contributors to the 2010 CO2 flux anomalies. (LLM, conf=0.89)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“One is that the turbulent surface fluxes often overcompensate for the enhanced shortwave warming (de Szoeke et al., 2010).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Predictability and Model Biases
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites de Szoeke et al., 2010 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Section 6 reports excessive turbulent-flux cooling in the models, balanced against excess radiative warming and insufficient oceanic cooling. The Summary says excess evaporation is about 40 W m⁻² versus about 20 W m⁻² of net excess radiation after longwave compensation. This supports overcompensation of net radiative warming, but does not establish that turbulent fluxes often exceed the enhanced shortwave warming alone. (LLM, conf=0.84)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Based on oxygen observations from repeat ship sections in the OMZ of the eastern tropical North Atlantic for the recent decade (2006)(2007)(2008)(2009)(2010)(2011)(2012)(2013)(2014)(2015), Hahn et al. (2017) suggested the existence of strong oxygen variations over this decade that are superimposed on the multi-decadal deoxygenation pattern (Stramma et al., 2009;Brandt et al., 2015;Santos et al., 2”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Biogeochemistry, Ecosystems, and Pollution
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Hahn et al., 2017 source
Split into 2 atoms — 2 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
- Supportedcites Stramma et al., 2009 source
Split into 2 atoms — 2 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
- Supportedcites Brandt et al., 2015 source
Split into 2 atoms — 2 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“In the eastern tropical Atlantic, estimates of the biological pump and its dependence on oxygen availability are complicated by the presence of mesoscale eddies, which contain shallow (40-100 m) suboxic environments (Karstensen et al., 2015).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Biogeochemistry, Ecosystems, and Pollution
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Karstensen et al., 2015 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction reports extremely low oxygen in mesoscale eddies in the eastern tropical North Atlantic, and §3.1 places one low-oxygen eddy core around 70 m depth. Section 3.4 links sinking particles to oxygen consumption, but does not establish that eddies complicate estimates of the biological pump or its dependence on oxygen availability; it says the available data cannot be used to estimate productivity. Page numbers were not provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“In models, interannual variations of temperature, nitrate, and oxygen concentrations along the southwestern coast of Africa are primarily controlled by oceanic teleconnections associated with equatorial wave variability and along-shore water mass transport (Mohrholz et al., 2008;Bachèlery, 2016;Bachèlery et al., 2016a,b;Koungue et al., 2017).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Biogeochemistry, Ecosystems, and Pollution
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Mohrholz et al., 2008 source
- Not matchedcites Bachèlery, 2016
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Partly supportedcites Koungue et al., 2017 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction reports modeling results in which equatorial remote forcing explains more than 80% of interannual coastal sea-surface temperature, nitrate, and oxygen variability. The Summary, Discussion, and Conclusions discusses advection of water masses but says its importance at interannual timescales is difficult to assess; it does not establish along-shore transport as a primary control. (LLM, conf=0.86)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“The number of measurements of fCO 2 increased from about 0.3 million per year during 1995-2000 to 1.1 million per year during 2005-2012 (Bakker et al., 2016).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Repeat Hydrographic Surveys and Ships of Opportunity
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Bakker et al., 2016 source
Section 7.1 reports 0.2–0.4 million SOCAT fCO₂ values per year in 1995–2000 and 1.0–1.2 million per year in 2005–2012. The claim’s approximate figures are the midpoints of those ranges. (LLM, conf=0.94)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“An array consisting of four velocity moorings has been installed at the Brazilian continental slope along 11 • S from 2000 to 2004 and since 2013, measuring the shallow and DWBC (Schott et al., 2005;Hummels et al., 2015).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Boundary Current Arrays
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Schott et al., 2005 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The moored-array observations section reports measurements near 11°S from 2000 to 2004, covering shallow flow and the deep western boundary current. It says the array initially had five moorings; four were deployed from 2002 to 2004. This 2005 paper does not document the installation since 2013 mentioned in the jointly cited sentence. (LLM, conf=0.90)
- Supportedcites Hummels et al., 2015 source
The Introduction says a four-mooring array equipped with current meters was deployed off Brazil at 11°S in July 2013 and compares it with moored observations from 2000–2004. The Abstract says a similar array was installed there during the earlier period, and section 3 reports moored transport time series for both the shallow North Brazil Undercurrent and the DWBC. (LLM, conf=0.93)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The spread in net surface heat flux (Q net ) mean values is large across the entire tropical basin (standard deviation > 20 W m -2 based on 12 different products; Figure 7).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Processes That Affect Upper-Ocean Temperature and Salinity
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the tropical Atlantic away from the equatorial cold tongue, the standard deviation of Q net is as large as the ensemble-mean Q net .”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Processes That Affect Upper-Ocean Temperature and Salinity
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For example, the RT-ORA-IP exercise illustrates that in spite of a reasonably well captured thermocline structure along the equatorial band, heat content anomalies close to the mouth of the Amazon show strong disagreement due to large differences in river discharge applied in the different reanalyses and the associated resultant differences in local ocean circulation.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Data Assimilation
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This project has been expanded to cover the tropical Atlantic and shows that overall, in the equatorial Atlantic the agreement between reanalyses is often reasonable.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Data Assimilation
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“However, locally the spread between estimates can reach 2 • C in the thermocline 7 .”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Data Assimilation
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Furthermore, there are large disparities between offequatorial winds measured directly by PIRATA and estimated by satellites and model-based reanalyses (Bentamy and Fillon, 2012), emphasizing the importance of maintaining the long records from all PIRATA moorings.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE FUTURE OBSERVING SYSTEM
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Bentamy and Fillon, 2012 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“1998, the array in the tropical Atlantic has averaged 92 drifters, and since 2005 drifter measurements have been approximately hourly.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > CONCLUSION
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Through its impacts on soil moisture, vegetation, and albedo, the rainfall received during a given year affects the likelihood of drought the following year, acting to enhance decadal-multidecadal variations of Sahel rainfall (Zeng et al., 1999).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Rainfall
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Zeng et al., 1999 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“During 2011-2016, Northeast Brazil experienced its most severe and prolonged drought since 1981 (Brito et al., 2018).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Rainfall
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Brito et al., 2018 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“There have been marked changes in Atlantic land-falling TCs in the past several decades (Wang et al., 2011;Kossin, 2017).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Tropical Cyclones
What the sources say
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“There are indications that TC activity and intensification before landfall may be increasing in the Atlantic due to global warming (Emanuel, 2005(Emanuel, , 2017;;Webster et al., 2005;Elsner et al., 2008).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Tropical Cyclones
What the sources say
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“There is also significant external forcing of TAV from ENSO, the North Atlantic Oscillation, and the South Atlantic Anticyclone (Enfield and Mayer, 1997;Czaja et al., 2002;Chang et al., 2006;Illig and Dewitte, 2006;Lübbecke et al., 2010;Lübbecke and McPhaden, 2012).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Modes of Variability and Tropical Cyclones
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“TAV involves coupled ocean-atmosphere processes and their interactions, most notably, fluctuations of the trade winds, SST, and rainfall (Figure 3; Xie and Carton, 2004).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Modes of Variability and Tropical Cyclones
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Xie and Carton, 2004
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Their threats to marine life are primarily mechanical, due to ingestion of plastics and entanglement (Derraik, 2002).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Ecosystems and Pollution
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Derraik, 2002 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The shorter period of EDJs in the Atlantic compared to the Pacific, combined with the strong and shallow EUC in the eastern equatorial Atlantic, enables EDJs to influence interannual climate variability in the Atlantic (Brandt et al., 2011b).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Ocean Circulation
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Brandt et al., 2011b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For satellite fluxes, major uncertainties are related to turbulent bulk flux parameterization schemes and also satellite retrieval algorithms.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Processes That Affect Upper-Ocean Temperature and Salinity
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“NBC rings interact with the Amazon and Orinoco river plumes, modifying barrier layers and thus affecting TC intensification.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Ocean Circulation
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
In the paper
“Turbulent mixing in the upper thermocline above the upper continental slopes and shelves of the eastern boundary upwelling regions is a dominant process bringing colder, nutrient-rich water from the deeper ocean to the surface mixed layer.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Processes That Affect Upper-Ocean Temperature and Salinity
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Schafstall et al., 2010 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“All Q net products have problems achieving a balanced energy budget at the ocean surface, with an overestimation of the downward heat input to the ocean ranging from 5 to 20 W m -2 (Yu, 2019).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Processes That Affect Upper-Ocean Temperature and Salinity
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Yu, 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Predicting tropical Atlantic climate is challenging, and the difficulty is exacerbated by persistent coupled climate model biases.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Predictability and Model Biases
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“At the equator, EDJs contribute to the ventilation of the eastern basin (Brandt et al., 2012).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Ocean Circulation
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Brandt et al., 2012 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Mixing is enhanced due to tide-topography interaction that largely sustains the elevated productivity in the Atlantic's eastern boundary upwelling regions (Schafstall et al., 2010).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Processes That Affect Upper-Ocean Temperature and Salinity
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Schafstall et al., 2010 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“The strength of the EUC undergoes a strong seasonal cycle in response to wind forcing (Johns et al., 2014;Brandt et al., 2016).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Ocean Circulation
What the sources say
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Some uncertainty remains in the actual near-coastal wind-stress curl, owing to the lack of reliable satellite data and atmospheric observations near land (Desbiolles et al., 2016).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Predictability and Model Biases
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Desbiolles et al., 2016 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Predicting the AZM is particularly challenging, with dynamical forecasts often matched or even outperformed by persistence forecasts (Stockdale et al., 2006;Richter et al., 2017).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Predictability and Model Biases
What the sources say
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“As a consequence, even the theory underpinning the existence of the Angola current is not completely settled (Junker et al., 2015).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Predictability and Model Biases
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Junker et al., 2015 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“One contribution to the insufficient cold tongue development in models is the equatorial westerly wind bias in March-May (Figure 9), which deepens the thermocline and inhibits cooling during the subsequent June-August upwelling season (Richter and Xie, 2008;Richter et al., 2012).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Predictability and Model Biases
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The tropical Atlantic biases weaken the Atlantic's global impact in models (McGregor et al., 2018).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Predictability and Model Biases
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites McGregor et al., 2018 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“However, the cool SST bias in the northern tropical Atlantic, common to coupled models (Richter, 2015;Zuidema et al., 2016b), can cause a 65% underrepresentation of Atlantic hurricane activity (Hsu et al., 2019).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Predictability and Model Biases
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Hsu et al., 2019 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“One common attribution of the warm SST biases in the Southeast Atlantic is an under-representation of the marine stratocumulus deck, which then allows too much sunlight to reach the ocean surface.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Predictability and Model Biases
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Klein and Hartmann, 1993
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Huang et al., 2007 source
- Not matchedcites Hu et al., 2008
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Conversely, ecosystem models have rarely included such quantitative approaches.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Data Assimilation
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“For instance, Busalacchi (1996) showed that the direct assimilation of sea level and thermocline depth observations improves the upperocean structure in the equatorial Atlantic.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Data Assimilation
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Busalacchi (1996) source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Ocean warming and the related solubility effect are responsible for about half of the multi-decadal oxygen decline in the upper 1200 m (Schmidtko et al., 2017).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Biogeochemistry, Ecosystems, and Pollution
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Schmidtko et al., 2017 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The cause of parameterization biases is often model specific (Medeiros et al., 2012), and ongoing observations of the boundary layer thermodynamic structure and its cloud, precipitation, and aerosol vertical structure, including the diurnal cycle, are needed for continued model improvement.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Predictability and Model Biases
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Medeiros et al., 2012 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“These difficulties often result from extensions of geostrophic balance using empirical approximations (e.g., Weaver et al., 2005).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Data Assimilation
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Weaver et al., 2005 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While data assimilation techniques and OSSEs are less mature for biogeochemical observations, dedicated experiments suggest that assimilation of biogeochemical Argo data will complement satellite surface color data by improving model estimates of oxygen, nutrients, carbon, and chlorophyll throughout the water column.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Data Assimilation
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“However, satellite scatterometer, altimeter, and synthetic aperture radar data are providing valuable assimilation constraints for wind and sea-state forecasts by NWP systems (Isaksen and Janssen, 2004;Dragani et al., 2015).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Data Assimilation
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Uncertainties in ocean reanalyses are largest in these regions due to sparse observations, large model errors and uncertainties in river run-off as well as air-sea heat, moisture, and momentum fluxes.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Data Assimilation
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Most data assimilation systems also suffer from overly simplistic balance (crosscovariance) formulations close to the equator that may jeopardize the assimilation of local observations.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Data Assimilation
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Such observational datasets remain sparse for the Southeast Atlantic.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Predictability and Model Biases
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The other is that even for AMIP simulations in which the SST is specified, the cloud radiative effect on the surface is still underestimated, with bias reductions of only ∼25% (Zuidema et al., 2016a).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Predictability and Model Biases
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Zuidema et al., 2016a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, no long-term measurements of horizontal velocity, vertical shear, and turbulent mixing exist in the tropical Atlantic outside the equatorial band (Figure 6).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Strengths and Weaknesses of the Current Observing System
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For winds less than about 3 m s -1 or greater than 20 m s -1 , the uncertainties are generally larger.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Satellite Observations
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Satellite observations have greatly improved the coverage, resolution, and accuracy of surface buoyancy and momentum flux estimates (Yu, 2018).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Satellite Observations
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Yu, 2018
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Despite significant progress, these variables remain the leading source of error in satellite-based surface heat flux products.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Satellite Observations
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The radiation budget at the ocean's surface is not remotely sensed.Instead it is estimated from radiative transfer calculations that use satellite-derived TOA irradiance, cloud and aerosol properties, and the atmospheric state from either satellites or reanalysis.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Satellite Observations
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There is a high degree of integration among the various sustained observing components so that weaknesses of some are compensated by the strengths of others.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Strengths and Weaknesses of the Current Observing System
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The vertical spacing of conductivity sensors on most moorings is much too coarse for accurate resolution of the mixed layer and salinity stratification required for heat and salinity budget analyses.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Strengths and Weaknesses of the Current Observing System
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Because of the cloud effect, it takes one or two weeks to obtain a complete global SST field from AVHRR even though the satellite orbits the Earth 14 times each day and has a 2399-km-wide swath.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Satellite Observations
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There is therefore a high degree of complementarity between satellite and in situ measurements.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Strengths and Weaknesses of the Current Observing System
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, PIRATA moorings do not sample the warm pool region to the west, where there are strong mesoscale eddies (Figure 8), seasonal variations of upperocean salinity stratification that affect SST and TCs, and strong multidecadal variations of upper-ocean heat content and SST (Figure 11).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Strengths and Weaknesses of the Current Observing System
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Oxygen and f CO 2 are not monitored by many elements of the tropical Atlantic observing system.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Strengths and Weaknesses of the Current Observing System
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There are very few measurements of surface wave height and spectra in the tropical Atlantic, which are needed to improve forecasts and to advance understanding of wave-induced upper-ocean mixing.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Strengths and Weaknesses of the Current Observing System
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A current lack of monitoring of biological variables also makes it challenging to determine how ecosystems will cope with changing physical and biogeochemical conditions.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Strengths and Weaknesses of the Current Observing System
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is difficult to close the heat and salinity budgets at many PIRATA mooring locations because at present less than half of the moorings have direct measurements of longwave radiation and ocean currents.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Strengths and Weaknesses of the Current Observing System
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, for PIRATA the ocean biogeochemistry and ecosystem observation capabilities have not yet been fully explored.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Strengths and Weaknesses of the Current Observing System
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In general, biogeochemical quantities are severely undersampled compared to many physical parameters, especially in the tropical South Atlantic (Figure 12).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Strengths and Weaknesses of the Current Observing System
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Therefore, the success of the tropical Atlantic observing system depends in part on the maintenance and evolution of those observing systems.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > CONCLUSION
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: The tropical Atlantic is strongly influenced by conditions in the Pacific and Indian Oceans as well as the extratropical North and South Atlantic.
- It may state two separate claims as one. 95
- Probably not a substantial claim. 69
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Rainfall in the Sahel has increased since the 1980s, but has not recovered to pre-drought levels (Nicholson et al., 2000;Dong and Sutton, 2015;Berntell et al., 2018).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Rainfall
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Nicholson et al., 2000 source
- Partly supportedcites Dong and Sutton, 2015 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Figure S4 caption (page unavailable) compares a Sahel drought period with a later 'recent wetter period,' supporting an increase in rainfall. It says the observed 1951–1963 precipitation value is shown, but the text does not state whether recent rainfall remained below that pre-drought level. (LLM, conf=0.82)
- Partly supportedcites Berntell et al., 2018 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction describes a drought in the 1970s and 1980s followed by rainfall recovery. The CRU observations section also reports wet conditions from 2000 onward. Neither passage establishes that rainfall remained below pre-drought levels. (LLM, conf=0.86)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“The two record droughts of 2005 and 2010 were regarded as “once in a century” climate extremes at the times of their occurrences and were linked to anomalous SSTs in the tropical Atlantic (Figure 1; Marengo et al., 2008;Zeng et al., 2008;Lewis et al., 2011).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Rainfall
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Marengo et al., 2008 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion and conclusions (section 6; page unavailable) describe the 2005 drought in southwestern Amazonia as possibly among the most severe in at least 100 years. The Introduction (section 1) links that drought to anomalously warm tropical North Atlantic SSTs. This 2008 paper does not address the 2010 drought, so it cannot support the claim about both events. (LLM, conf=0.90)
- Partly supportedcites Zeng et al., 2008 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Section 4 links the 2005 Amazon drought to tropical Atlantic SST anomalies. The paper does not address the 2010 drought or describe either event as “once in a century”; it calls the 2005 drought rare and reports near-record-low streamflows. (LLM, conf=0.90)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Lewis et al., 2011 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“At the other extreme, the Amazon floods of 2009 and 2012 were the largest going back several decades (Satyamurty et al., 2013;Filizola et al., 2014) and left hundreds of thousands homeless.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Rainfall
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Satyamurty et al., 2013 source
The citation follows the claim that the 2009 and 2012 floods were the largest in decades, not the subsequent statement about homelessness. The Abstract reports that the 2012 Manaus Port level exceeded the previous 2009 record, and the Introduction calls both years record floods. These findings support the cited claim as measured by river level at Manaus. (LLM, conf=0.90)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Filizola et al., 2014 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“There is also strong evidence linking decadal-multidecadal tropical Atlantic SST variability to hurricane activity (Goldenberg et al., 2001;Latif et al., 2007;Balaguru et al., 2018), but the drivers of this SST variability are not well known (Yang, 1999;Chang et al., 2000;Tanimoto and Xie, 2002;Evan et al., 2011;Booth et al., 2012;Clement et al., 2015).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Modes of Variability and Tropical Cyclones
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Goldenberg et al., 2001 source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Latif et al., 2007 source
- Supportedcites Balaguru et al., 2018 source
Balaguru et al. state in §3.2 that the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (AMO) modulates Atlantic hurricane activity on interannual-to-decadal timescales. §2.1 defines the AMO index using Atlantic SST, and §3.2 links it to SST patterns and hurricane rapid intensification. Balaguru et al. are cited for the SST–hurricane link, not for the separate claim about its uncertain drivers. (LLM, conf=0.89)
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“The frequency of marine heatwaves has increased significantly in the tropical North Atlantic during the past 35 years and is expected to increase further in response to global warming (Oliver et al., 2018).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Ecosystems and Pollution
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Oliver et al., 2018 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results (‘Marine heatwaves over the satellite record’; page unavailable) report a significant global increase in frequency over 1982–2016 and more moderate increases in the subtropical North Atlantic. The Abstract expects further increases in marine heatwave days under continued global warming. Our copy does not establish a significant frequency increase specifically in the tropical North Atlantic or predict further frequency increases specifically there. (LLM, conf=0.85)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Since 2011, there has been an increase in the abundance of Sargassum in the western tropical North Atlantic, often resulting in mass “beaching” events in the Caribbean (Wang and Hu, 2017) and also in western Africa and Brazil.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Ecosystems and Pollution
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Wang and Hu, 2017 source
The Abstract says Sargassum blooms appear to have increased in the tropical Atlantic and Caribbean since 2011. The Introduction reports massive beaching events in the Caribbean since 2011, supporting the portion of the citing sentence attached to Wang and Hu (2017). (LLM, conf=0.90)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“It has also been shown that contaminants from plastic debris may leach into seawater or be ingested by marine organisms (Romera-Castillo et al., 2018), creating a new risk route.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Ecosystems and Pollution
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Romera-Castillo et al., 2018 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction (page unavailable) says plastic additives can leach into surrounding water and that marine animals ingest plastic debris. It does not say that animals ingest contaminants from the plastic; the ingestion passage concerns plastic itself. The paper supports the leaching route, but not that specific ingestion route. (LLM, conf=0.85)
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“The AZM-ENSO relationship is strongest during negative AMV phases (Martín-Rey et al., 2014;Polo et al., 2015a), when equatorial Atlantic SST variability is enhanced (Martín-Rey et al., 2018).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Modes of Variability and Tropical Cyclones
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Martín-Rey et al., 2014 source
The Abstract states that the Atlantic–Pacific Niños connection occurs in particular decades coinciding with negative phases of the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation, and is the leading coupled mode during those decades. This supports the first clause, to which the 2014 citation is attached; the enhanced Atlantic SST variability clause is cited to a different paper. (LLM, conf=0.91)
- Not matchedcites Polo et al., 2015a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Martín-Rey et al., 2018 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“The strength of the feedback depends on a storm's intensity and translation speed as well as the ocean heat content and salinity structure, which vary regionally and on seasonal to multidecadal timescales (Shay et al., 2000;Balaguru et al., 2012Balaguru et al., , 2015Balaguru et al., , 2018)).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Modes of Variability and Tropical Cyclones
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Shay et al., 2000 source
- Partly supportedcites Balaguru et al., 2012 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Conclusions and Discussion (page unavailable) state that salinity-stratified barrier layers reduce cyclone-induced sea-surface cooling and affect intensification; they also mention interannual-to-decadal variability in barrier-layer conditions. The Methods account for storm intensity and translation speed, but the paper does not establish the claimed dependence of feedback strength on those factors or document seasonal-to-multidecadal variation in ocean heat content and salinity structure. (LLM, conf=0.83)
- Partly supportedcites Balaguru et al., 2015 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction describes SST cooling as a negative feedback on TC intensity, and the Mixing Length Formulation (section 3; page unavailable) makes mixing depend on storm wind speed, translation speed, and ocean stratification. The Results and Discussion describe regional differences, and the Methods use temperature and salinity profiles, but the paper does not establish that the relevant ocean conditions vary on seasonal-to-multidecadal timescales. (LLM, conf=0.86)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“The AZM impacts the Indian summer monsoon (ISM), altering the ENSO-ISM connection (Kucharski et al., 2007(Kucharski et al., , 2008;;Wang et al., 2009;Barimalala et al., 2012Barimalala et al., , 2013)).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Modes of Variability and Tropical Cyclones
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Kucharski et al., 2007 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The section “The role of tropical Atlantic SSTs” reports that Atlantic SST anomalies affect Indian monsoon circulation and reduce the anticorrelation between ENSO and Indian monsoon rainfall. The Discussion and conclusions likewise links south-equatorial Atlantic SST anomalies to a weakened ENSO–monsoon relationship. Neither passage identifies those anomalies specifically as the Atlantic Zonal Mode (AZM), so the AZM-specific attribution is not established by our copy. Page numbers were not supplied. (LLM, conf=0.84)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Wang et al., 2009 source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Barimalala et al., 2012 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“Climate models predict increases in wind shear in some portions of the Atlantic hurricane development region (Latif et al., 2007;Vecchi and Soden, 2007), which would, however, act to decrease overall Atlantic storm activity.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Modes of Variability and Tropical Cyclones
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Latif et al., 2007 source
- Supportedcites Vecchi and Soden, 2007 source
Section 2 reports model-projected increases in wind shear over parts of the Atlantic hurricane development region. The Introduction says wind shear inhibits cyclone development, and Section 4 says the projected increase could inhibit intensification. The paper cautions that the resulting change in storm frequency and intensity remains uncertain; the citing sentence describes a decreasing influence, not a predicted net decline. (LLM, conf=0.88)
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“In situ data are crucial for anchoring global efforts to develop a global climate observing system (Weatherhead et al., 2018) and discriminate the imbalance in the Earth's radiation budget as the climate warms (Kato et al., 2013).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Processes That Affect Upper-Ocean Temperature and Salinity
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Weatherhead et al., 2018 source
The Abstract identifies ground-based and in situ observations as part of evaluating approaches to future climate-observing priorities. The discussion of independent verification also calls independent observations a guiding principle for designing an international climate observing system. The radiation-budget clause is cited to Kato et al., not Weatherhead et al., and is outside this verdict. (LLM, conf=0.87)
- Partly supportedcites Kato et al., 2013 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Section 7, “Comparison with surface observations” (page not supplied), uses land-site and buoy measurements to evaluate estimated surface irradiances, supporting a role for in situ data. The Introduction discusses changes in the atmospheric energy budget, but the paper does not establish that in situ data discriminate an imbalance in Earth’s radiation budget as the climate warms. The separate observing-system clause is attributed to Weatherhead et al., not Kato et al. (LLM, conf=0.78)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Relatively little is known about the vertical structure and seasonality of the poleward Angola current (Tchipalanga et al., 2018), though data from recently deployed buoys in the region are beginning to shed some light on this (Kopte et al., 2017).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Predictability and Model Biases
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Tchipalanga et al., 2018 source
The History of Physical Oceanography in Angola section says knowledge of the current’s velocity structure had historically come from only a few synoptic observations. The Summary and Discussion describes the paper’s new account of its depth and seasonal changes. The buoy-data clause is cited to Kopte et al. (2017), not to this source. (LLM, conf=0.88)
- Supportedcites Kopte et al., 2017 source
The Introduction says the first moored observations off Angola, collected from 2013 to 2015, provide insight into the Angola Current’s mean state and variability. The Abstract and Discussion report findings on its depth range and seasonal variability. The paper calls the instruments moorings rather than buoys, but the attributed point—that newly deployed instruments are shedding light on the current—is supported. (LLM, conf=0.87)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Because of the large spatial extent of the shortwave-absorbing aerosols, they are capable of influencing the interhemispheric energy balance, the location of the ITCZ, and regional precipitation patterns (Jones et al., 2009;Randles and Ramaswamy, 2010;Sakaeda et al., 2011).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Predictability and Model Biases
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Jones et al., 2009 source
- Partly supportedcites Randles and Ramaswamy, 2010 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results section (page not provided) reports that absorbing biomass-burning aerosols alter circulation and increase precipitation over parts of southern Africa, supporting the regional-precipitation part of the claim. The paper does not establish effects on the interhemispheric energy balance or the location of the ITCZ; searches for those terms found no relevant passage. (LLM, conf=0.88)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Sakaeda et al., 2011 source
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Positive dust and cloud feedbacks on SST and climate have been established at interannual and decadal timescales in both hemispheres (Evan et al., 2011;Bellomo et al., 2015;Myers et al., 2018) and are capable of amplifying the AMV (Bellomo et al., 2016;Yuan et al., 2016).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Predictability and Model Biases
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Evan et al., 2011 source
- Partly supportedcites Bellomo et al., 2015 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Summary (page unavailable) reports that positive low-level cloud feedback over the Namibian region enhances simulated Atlantic Niño variability, supporting the cloud-feedback part of the first clause. It does not establish positive dust feedbacks or cloud feedbacks at both interannual and decadal timescales in both hemispheres; the Introduction says the relationship between North and South Atlantic variability remains unclear. The sentence cites other papers, not Bellomo et al. (2015), for the separate AMV-amplification clause. (LLM, conf=0.88)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Myers et al., 2018 source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“While most prediction models drop well below that by lead month 3 (Richter et al., 2017), some promising systems show skill in predicting the AZM in summer when initialized on May 1 (Prodhomme et al., 2016).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Predictability and Model Biases
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Richter et al., 2017 source
- Partly supportedcites Prodhomme et al., 2016 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Bias and Bias Correction section describes June–August forecasts initialized in May, matching the timing attributed to this source. But the copy does not report skill in predicting the AZM; the Conclusions instead discuss deteriorated tropical Atlantic SST skill in the higher-resolution runs. The lead-month-3 comparison is attached to Richter et al., not this citation. (LLM, conf=0.78)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“It may be linked to the erroneous southward shift in the Atlantic ITCZ, which is also present in atmosphere-only simulations (Figure 9B; Richter et al., 2014b), and the misrepresentation of convective momentum transport in the lower troposphere (Zermeño-Diaz and Zhang, 2013;Richter et al., 2014b).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Predictability and Model Biases
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Richter et al., 2014b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Partly supportedcites Zermeño-Diaz and Zhang, 2013 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Section 5 (Momentum entrainment; page not available) links the westerly bias to insufficient downward transport of easterly momentum from the lower troposphere into the boundary layer. It does not identify that transport specifically as convective momentum transport. The ITCZ-shift clause is separately cited to Richter et al. (2014b), so it is not assessed against this source. (LLM, conf=0.83)
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“There are two main causes of the model errors in this region: (1) equatorial biases (Rouault et al., 2007), and (2) errors in local winds, especially the Benguela Jet (Xu et al., 2014a;Koseki et al., 2018;Voldoire et al., 2019) and the Benguela Current (Grodsky et al., 2012a;Muñoz et al., 2012).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Predictability and Model Biases
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Rouault et al., 2007 source
- Not matchedcites Xu et al., 2014a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Supportedcites Koseki et al., 2018 source
The Introduction identifies the Benguela low-level coastal jet and associated local wind-stress-curl biases as explanations for the SST bias. The Discussion and concluding remarks (§7) also report that local surface-wind errors increase the model’s warm bias. The citation to Koseki et al. is attached to the local-wind and Benguela Jet part of the sentence, not the separately cited equatorial-bias or Benguela Current parts. (LLM, conf=0.92)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Temperature and salinity errors were reduced by 5-10% in the upper 2000 m with an enhancement of Argo sampling in equatorial regions and by around 20-30% in the deep ocean due to the implementation of deep Argo (Gasparin et al., 2019).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Data Assimilation
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Gasparin et al., 2019 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The 'Doubling Argo in the WBC and Along the Equator' section reports a 5–10% reduction in temperature and salinity error across the Atlantic in the upper 2,000 m. 'Implementing a Deep Argo Array' reports an average improvement of 20% below 2,000 m, not a 20–30% reduction; its 20–30% figure is the standard deviation across systems. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Mechanisms that are responsible for the other half are unclear and are likely related to changes in ventilation and circulation (Brandt et al., 2015;Oschlies et al., 2018), though changes in biological activity cannot be ruled out.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Biogeochemistry, Ecosystems, and Pollution
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Brandt et al., 2015 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Section 7 (Long-term variability in ETNA OMZ) says the driving mechanisms of observed deoxygenation remain uncertain and discusses circulation, mixing, and biogeochemical oxygen consumption. Section 9 (Summary and discussion) identifies circulation changes as a likely contributor to the regional decline. The paper does not attribute a specific ‘other half’ of the multidecadal decline to these mechanisms; its quantitative statement instead concerns an imbalance equal to about 10% of oxygen consumption. (LLM, conf=0.85)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Oschlies et al., 2018 source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Acidification has been examined at this site, though the record is not long enough to detect any increase in CO 2 (or decrease of pH) given the strong natural variability of CO 2 (Lefevre et al., 2016).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Biogeochemistry, Ecosystems, and Pollution
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Lefevre et al., 2016 source
The Conclusions state that no significant trend in surface fCO₂ or pH was detected at the 6°S, 10°W mooring over seven years. They attribute the difficulty of detecting a trend to the short, gapped record and high variability caused by complex ocean circulation. (LLM, conf=0.94)
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Inside the eddies' cores, oxygen consumption can be an order of magnitude higher than the average values for the North Atlantic, and the downward flux of organic matter exceeds typical values found in the open ocean (Fiedler et al., 2016).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Biogeochemistry, Ecosystems, and Pollution
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Fiedler et al., 2016 source
Section 3.5 reports a peak oxygen-utilization rate of 0.26 µmol kg⁻¹ d⁻¹ in the eddy core, compared with a mean of 0.03 at similar depths in the eastern tropical North Atlantic—approximately an order of magnitude higher. The same section says the estimated downward particulate-organic-carbon fluxes are exceptionally high for the region and other open-ocean regions. The paper’s oxygen comparison is specifically regional, rather than a basin-wide North Atlantic average. (LLM, conf=0.90)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Even when the CMIP surface radiative forcing is correct, the cloud cover is still typically too low (de Szoeke et al., 2012), likely due to an underestimation of optically thin stratiform clouds (Nam et al., 2012;Zuidema et al., 2012;Delgadillo et al., 2018;Wood et al., 2018).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Predictability and Model Biases
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites de Szoeke et al., 2012 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The supplied copy’s Introduction, Model and experiments, and Conclusions and discussion sections concern Atlantic overturning circulation, not stratocumulus clouds. Searches for low cloud cover despite correct surface radiative forcing and for eastern Pacific stratocumulus returned no relevant passage. The copy therefore cannot verify the part attributed to de Szoeke et al.; the optically thin cloud explanation is cited to other works. (LLM, conf=0.78)
- Partly supportedcites Nam et al., 2012 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Conclusion and Discussion (§6, paragraph 20; page unavailable) reports that CMIP5 models underestimate tropical low-cloud cover and overestimate low-cloud optical thickness. It does not identify an underestimation of optically thin stratiform clouds as the likely cause. The preceding statement about surface radiative forcing is cited to a different source, not Nam et al. (LLM, conf=0.84)
- Could not verifycites Zuidema et al., 2012 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Conclusions report that thin clouds were frequent in the observed southeast Pacific dataset. Section 5.4 discusses thin clouds missed by an instrument retrieval, not clouds underestimated by CMIP models. A search for model underestimation of optically thin stratiform clouds found no passage addressing the explanation attributed to this paper. (LLM, conf=0.72)
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Could not verify
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Oxygen changes in the tropical North Atlantic during the past decade are most likely associated with changes in the eddy-driven zonal current bands at intermediate depths and a shoaling of the wind-driven thermocline circulation, but other processes, such as variations in the intensity of the mesoscale eddy field, may contribute (Hahn et al., 2017).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Biogeochemistry, Ecosystems, and Pollution
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Hahn et al., 2017 source
The Summary and conclusion (section 5; page unavailable) identifies strengthened intermediate-depth zonal jets as a likely reason for increased oxygen below 400 m. The oxygen-budget discussion (section 4.3; page unavailable) links a shoaling and weakening of near-surface circulation to reduced ventilation above, while section 4.2 says a contribution from changes in lateral eddy mixing cannot be assessed, though eddy mixing alone does not fit the observed pattern. (LLM, conf=0.88)
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Argo is a global array of autonomous floats that sample the upper 2000 m of the ocean (Jayne et al., 2017).The floats drift at a depth of 1000 m and make profiles of temperature, salinity, and pressure in the upper 2000 m typically every 10 days.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Argo
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Jayne et al., 2017 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Since 2000, a mooring array has been maintained at 16 • N that includes velocity measurements covering the DWBC east of Guadeloupe and additional geostrophic moorings measuring the deep flow between the continental slope and the mid-Atlantic ridge (Send et al., 2011;Frajka-Williams et al., 2018).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Boundary Current Arrays
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Send et al., 2011 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Observations section describes a nearly 10-year continuous MOVE mooring record at 16°N, with current-meter measurements near the continental slope and geostrophic measurements across a 1000 km section. The Figure 1 caption places the moorings between the coast and Mid-Atlantic Ridge and depicts the deep western boundary current. Our copy does not explicitly establish the exact start year of 2000 or locate the boundary-current measurements east of Guadeloupe; page numbers were not available. (LLM, conf=0.82)
- Supportedcites Frajka-Williams et al., 2018 source
Section 2.2 (page not supplied) says the MOVE array at 16°N has operated since early 2000, with current measurements east of Guadeloupe and a nearby current-meter mooring capturing the boundary current. It also describes an eastern mooring near the Mid-Atlantic Ridge and a deep-flow estimate based on dynamic-height profiles between the western and eastern sites. (LLM, conf=0.90)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Since 2008, the moorings at 4 • N, 23 • W and 12 • N, 23 • W have measured dissolved oxygen (O 2 ) at depths of 300 and 500 m in order to monitor the OMZ.O 2 sensors were recently added at 20.5 • N, 23 • W (Bourlès et al., 2019).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Moored Buoys
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Bourlès et al., 2019 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Section 2.1 states that oxygen sensors were installed in 2008 at 4°N, 23°W and 12°N, 23°W at 300 and 500 m to monitor the OMZ. It also reports additional oxygen sensors at 21°N, 23°W, but does not give the claimed location of 20.5°N, 23°W. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Currently, there are three transects in the tropical Atlantic, each repeated approximately every 3 months (Figure 10).XBTs are deployed 10 to 35 km apart to measure temperature in the upper 760 m, from which mesoscale eddy variability and the larger-scale ocean circulation can be deduced (Goes et al., 2013).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Repeat Hydrographic Surveys and Ships of Opportunity
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Goes et al., 2013 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Section 2.1, paragraph [7] describes one tropical Atlantic XBT transect, AX08, with about four realizations per year, an average 25 km spacing between casts in the tropics, and probes with a nominal depth range of 760 m. It does not establish that there are three transects or that casts across them are spaced 10–35 km apart. (LLM, conf=0.88)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“At the equator, several subsurface acoustic Doppler current profiler (ADCP) moorings are maintained as part of PIRATA (Bourlès et al., 2019).They measure currents typically from depths of about 30 to 300 m.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Moored Buoys
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Bourlès et al., 2019 source
Section 2.3, “ADCP Moorings,” states that PIRATA maintains subsurface ADCP moorings at equatorial sites and that the ADCPs typically monitor currents from about 30 to 300 m. It also describes a third equatorial mooring deployed in 2016 for future maintenance as part of PIRATA. (LLM, conf=0.94)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“It was initiated in 1997 and now consists of 18 moorings spanning the basin.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Moored Buoys
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Bourlès et al., 2008 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Abstract states that PIRATA implementation began in 1997 and describes a buoy network in the tropical Atlantic. The ATLAS BUOYS section lists five western backbone, five eastern backbone, three Southwest Extension, and four Northeast Extension buoys—17 in total. The PIRATA EXPANSIONS section describes a separate Southeast pilot mooring that ended in June 2007, so the paper does not support 18 as the current mooring count. (LLM, conf=0.87)
- Supportedcites Bourlès et al., 2019 source
The Abstract says PIRATA was initiated in 1997 in the tropical Atlantic. Section 2.1 says the array grew to 17 buoys and that an eighteenth buoy site was re-established in 2013, supporting the stated count of 18 across the basin. (LLM, conf=0.90)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Profiles of biogeochemical (BGC) parameters are currently made by 329 Argo floats in the global ocean, of which 22 are in the tropical Atlantic (Figure 2B).The measured parameters include oxygen, chlorophyll-a, suspended particles, nitrate, pH, and downwelling irradiance.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Argo
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Gruber et al., 2010 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction says Argo floats measure dissolved oxygen. Section 6.1 reports more than 200 oxygen-equipped floats deployed and 160 reporting data during a 20-day period in May 2009. The paper does not substantiate the claimed 329 BGC floats, 22 in the tropical Atlantic, or the full list of measured parameters; its figures describe a different time and subset of floats. (LLM, conf=0.85)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Much of the present observing system was designed before coupled model biases emerged as a scientific research priority.As a result, efforts to alleviate model biases are hampered by inadequate in situ measurements (Tchipalanga et al., 2018).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Strengths and Weaknesses of the Current Observing System
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Tchipalanga et al., 2018 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
In “History of Physical Oceanography in Angola” (page unavailable), the paper says a lack of observations prevents satisfactory evaluation of model simulations along the Angolan margin. Its “Summary and Discussion” (page unavailable) links better observations and process understanding to reducing model biases. It does not say that the observing system was designed before coupled-model biases became a research priority, and its discussion is regional rather than a claim about much of the present observing system. (LLM, conf=0.86)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Coupled ocean-atmosphere data assimilation, a promising approach to improve oceanic and atmospheric analyses and coupled model forecasts, is in its infancy (Zhang et al., 2007;Lu et al., 2015).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE FUTURE OBSERVING SYSTEM
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Zhang et al., 2007 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The introduction (page unavailable) describes this study as a first step in applying and validating its coupled data-assimilation system, with only a preliminary evaluation. That supports an early-stage characterization of this system, but the paper does not say that coupled ocean–atmosphere data assimilation as a field is in its infancy. (LLM, conf=0.78)
- Not matchedcites Lu et al., 2015
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Partly supported
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The tropical Atlantic observing system has progressed substantially over the past 20 years (Figure 2), yet many challenges remain.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > INTRODUCTION
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Most deployments are conducted from the expendable bathythermograph (XBT) line AX8, which runs from Cape Town to the U.S. east coast, from research vessels servicing PIRATA, and from Brazilian Navy vessels.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > CONCLUSION
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“1998, the array in the tropical Atlantic has averaged 92 drifters, and since 2005 drifter measurements have been approximately hourly.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > CONCLUSION
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Since 2005, there have been eight Atlantic hurricanes that have resulted in at least $25 billion in damages, including Harvey, Irma, and Maria in 2017 and Florence in 2018 2,3 .”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Tropical Cyclones
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Present-day observations and models show that the ocean sink has increased along with CO 2 emissions and is currently absorbing about 28% of anthropogenic CO 2 emissions annually (Le Quéré et al., 2018).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Biogeochemistry
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Le Quéré et al., 2018
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Short-term predictions and longer decadal and century-scale projections of the tropical Atlantic are made more challenging by persistent biases in climate models that have seen little progress over the past two decades.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > INTRODUCTION
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These conditions are driven by complex interactions between the ocean, atmosphere, and land, and between other ocean basins and the tropical Atlantic.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > INTRODUCTION
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Tropical Atlantic variability (TAV) influences a wide range of societally important phenomena on different timescales that span the physical, biogeochemical, and ecological systems and their interactions.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > SOCIETAL DRIVERS
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Its onset is typically in late June or early July and it ends normally from late September to October (Sultan and Janicot, 2003).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Rainfall
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Sultan and Janicot, 2003
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“There is stronger interannual variability at the Guinea Coast compared to the Sahel, and rainfall anomalies often extend zonally across West Africa (Giannini et al., 2005), affecting large populations.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Rainfall
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Giannini et al., 2005 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“There has also been significant decadal-multidecadal variability of TC activity in the Atlantic, with above-normal activity during the 1940s and 50s, belownormal from the 60s to the early 90s, and above-normal since the mid-90s (Goldenberg et al., 2001).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Tropical Cyclones
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Goldenberg et al., 2001 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Rainfall in South America and West Africa and Atlantic hurricanes are highly sensitive to conditions in the tropical Atlantic.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > INTRODUCTION
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Prior to the recent drought period, Northeast Brazil experienced a severe flood in 2009 that has been linked to anomalous SSTs in the tropical Atlantic (Foltz et al., 2012).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Rainfall
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Foltz et al., 2012 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Strong and societally relevant variability occurs on seasonal to multidecadal timescales.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > INTRODUCTION
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The tropical Atlantic is home to multiple coupled climate variations covering a wide range of timescales and impacting societally relevant phenomena such as continental rainfall, Atlantic hurricane activity, oceanic biological productivity, and atmospheric circulation in the equatorial Pacific.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The tropical Atlantic includes two major eastern boundary upwelling systems that support some of the world's most productive fisheries: the Canary and the Benguela (Chaigneau et al., 2009).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Biogeochemistry
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Chaigneau et al., 2009 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The tropical Atlantic receives about 25% of the global riverine freshwater discharge from three large rivers (Amazon, Congo, and Orinoco; Dai and Trenberth, 2002).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Biogeochemistry
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Dai and Trenberth, 2002
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Theory and numerical models predict that as SST rises, the maximum potential intensity that storms can reach will increase, enabling more powerful hurricanes (Emanuel, 1999;Elsner et al., 2008).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Modes of Variability and Tropical Cyclones
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“While uptake of anthropogenic CO 2 by the ocean regulates the atmospheric CO 2 concentration, it also leads to ocean acidification, with significant but poorly understood consequences for marine organisms and ecosystems (Feely et al., 2004;Bates, 2007).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Biogeochemistry
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“A positive AMM favors an earlier migration of the ITCZ northward during April-May, shortening the rainfall season over the Amazon region and Brazilian Northeast and leading to severe droughts over the Northeast (Figures 4B,C; Nobre and Shukla, 1996;Hastenrath, 2006;Kucharski et al., 2008;Liebmann and Mechoso, 2011;Rodrigues et al., 2011).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Modes of Variability and Tropical Cyclones
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The frequency of extreme El Niño and La Niña events is likely to increase (Cai et al., 2014(Cai et al., , 2015a,b,b), which will affect the tropical North Atlantic ocean-atmosphere system.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Modes of Variability and Tropical Cyclones
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Cai et al., 2014 source
- Not matchedcites Cai et al., 2015a,b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“This is mainly because satellites cannot retrieve the variables a few meters above the sea surface and instead rely on empirically derived algorithms applied to total-column water vapor or precipitable water (Liu et al., 1991).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Processes That Affect Upper-Ocean Temperature and Salinity
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Liu et al., 1991 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“These events act to intensify the OMZ in the upper 200 m and have severe direct impacts on the local ecosystem (Schütte et al., 2016b).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Ocean Circulation
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Schütte et al., 2016b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“The eastern tropical Atlantic on both sides of the equator is occupied by OMZs, which result from sluggish ventilated shadow zones (Luyten et al., 1983) situated equatorward of the subtropical gyres.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Ocean Circulation
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Luyten et al., 1983 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Coupled model simulations indicate a general warming in the tropical Atlantic, with reduced seasonal cycle and interannual variability, in response to an AMOC weakening (Chang et al., 2008).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Ocean Circulation
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Chang et al., 2008 source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“These waves significantly contribute to the upper-ocean heat and freshwater budgets through their influence on horizontal and vertical mixing (Foltz et al., 2003;Jochum et al., 2004;Hummels et al., 2013) and provide energy to EDJs via downward propagating Yanai beams (Tuchen et al., 2018).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Ocean Circulation
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Eddies are generated in the eastern side of the basin connecting the eastern boundary upwelling systems with the open oceans, transporting oxygenpoor and nutrient-rich waters into the oligotrophic ocean and impacting the mean state (Schütte et al., 2016a,b).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Ocean Circulation
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Schütte et al., 2016a,b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“The Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) and subtropical cells (STCs) are examples of basin-wide and regional circulations, respectively, that are influenced by and interact with the circulation in the tropical Atlantic and affect tropical Atlantic climate and extreme weather (Zhang et al., 2003;Knight et al., 2005;Zhang and Delworth, 2006).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Ocean Circulation
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“These biases have received much attention but seen little improvement (Davey et al., 2002;Richter and Xie, 2008;Richter et al., 2014b;Giarolla et al., 2015;Zuidema et al., 2016b).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Predictability and Model Biases
What the sources say
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Upwelling is driven by southerly winds associated with the Benguela low-level coastal jet, with oceanic currents and the location of the Angola-Benguela frontal zone sensitive to the jet's wind-stress curl (Colberg and Reason, 2006;Fennel et al., 2012).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Predictability and Model Biases
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Models typically produce too weak of a cold tongue that also appears too late in the year, while placing cool SST in the western equatorial Atlantic warm pool, defined as the area with SSTs above 28.5 • C.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Predictability and Model Biases
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Another factor that may contribute to the cold tongue bias is insufficient representation of the oceanic thermocline (Hazeleger and Haarsma, 2005;Xu et al., 2014b), which may be related to deficiencies in vertical mixing parameterizations.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Predictability and Model Biases
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Hazeleger and Haarsma, 2005 source
- Not matchedcites Xu et al., 2014b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The warm SST bias in the Benguela coastal upwelling region (Figure 9) is more severe than that at the equator, exceeding 2.5 • C in the multi-model average of atmosphereocean general circulation models (AOGCMs) from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5; Toniazzo and Woolnough, 2014;Richter, 2015;Zuidema et al., 2016a).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Predictability and Model Biases
What the sources say
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“This introduces a positive feedback: the warmer ocean surface reduces the lower tropospheric stability that maintains the low cloud deck (Klein and Hartmann, 1993;Huang et al., 2007;Hu et al., 2008), further reducing the low cloud cover.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Predictability and Model Biases
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Klein and Hartmann, 1993
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Huang et al., 2007 source
- Not matchedcites Hu et al., 2008
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The present tropical mooring array provides invaluable time series for evaluation of models and assimilation systems, the latter being primarily impacted in the region of the moorings.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Data Assimilation
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Measurements of temperature and salinity in the deep ocean and surface atmospheric pressure appear to be top priorities for improving operational data assimilation and ocean state estimates.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Data Assimilation
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“This suggests the atmospheric component of the coupled models is the primary culprit (Lauer and Hamilton, 2013), with the ocean playing a vital but secondary role (Richter, 2015).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Predictability and Model Biases
What the sources say
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In many regions of the tropical Atlantic, the rate at which pH is declining, its causes, and its impacts on CaCO 3 shell-forming species are not well known.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Biogeochemistry, Ecosystems, and Pollution
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The high temporal sampling rates of moorings are not exploited in most current assimilation systems, and the mooring impact could potentially be larger with better adapted and more advanced assimilation systems.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Data Assimilation
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Fish stock assessment models have developed quantitative methods to optimize the population dynamics parameters of exploited species based mainly on catch and fishing effort data, and in some cases tagging data (Maunder and Punt, 2013).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Data Assimilation
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Maunder and Punt, 2013 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“OMZs are expected to strengthen the biological carbon pump, as surface-produced OM is better preserved due to oxygen deficiency.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Biogeochemistry, Ecosystems, and Pollution
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“There have been some successful attempts to assimilate microwave data from the Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS), Aquarius, and Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) satellites to correct SSS (Martin, 2016).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Data Assimilation
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Martin, 2016 source
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“The mooring consists of an ADCP covering the upper 500 m at 11 • S, 13 • E and has been recording data since 2013, showing a weak and highly variable southward flow of the Angola Current (Kopte et al., 2018).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Boundary Current Arrays
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Kopte et al., 2018 source
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Precipitation at the ocean's surface is retrieved from variables that are highly correlated with rainfall, including infrared and microwave brightness temperature, as well as visible and nearinfrared albedo.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Satellite Observations
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Since 2006 at 6 • S, 10 • W and since 2008 at 8 • N, 38 • W, CO 2 Carbon Interface Ocean Atmosphere (CARIOCA) sensors have been measuring the fugacity of CO 2 (fCO 2 ) at a depth of about 1 m.In 2017, a new CARIOCA sensor was implemented at 6 • S, 8 • E.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Moored Buoys
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The Global Ocean Ship-based Hydrographic Investigations Program (GO-SHIP) conducts high-quality, full-depth measurements in the global ocean approximately once per decade (Figure 10).The measurements have high spatial and vertical resolutions and measure many different physical, chemical, and biological variables, including heat, freshwater, carbon, oxygen, nutrients and transient tracers.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Repeat Hydrographic Surveys and Ships of Opportunity
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In situ data are critical for validating and calibrating satellite retrievals, and satellite data are useful for filling temporal gaps in mooring surface data and for providing information to fill the large spatial gaps between moorings and other in situ surface measurements.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Strengths and Weaknesses of the Current Observing System
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“All moorings measure ocean temperature in the upper 500 m, salinity in the upper 120 m, and near-surface air temperature, relative humidity, wind velocity, rainfall, and incident shortwave radiation.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Moored Buoys
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Near-surface air humidity and temperature cannot be retrieved directly by satellites.Instead, these variables are estimated from satellite-measured total column water vapor or total precipitable water (PW) (Liu, 1986;Liu et al., 1991) using passive microwave radiometers such as Special Sensor Microwave Imager and Sounder (SSM/I and SSMIS, respectively), AMSR-E, and AMSR-2.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Satellite Observations
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Beginning in 2014, all buoys have been equipped with acoustic receivers at a depth of 200 m as a contribution to the Ocean Tracking Network (OTN 8 ).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Moored Buoys
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Moorings also do not resolve well the equatorial waveguide, especially meridionally, or the southeastern tropical Atlantic, where there are large SST signals associated with Benguela Niños, model biases, and complex ocean-atmosphere interactions involving winds, currents, SST, clouds, and aerosols.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Strengths and Weaknesses of the Current Observing System
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Most satellites provide measurements in real-time or near real-time, and the records for many parameters extend back at least 20 years.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Satellite Observations
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Pollutants such as mercury and plastics can negatively impact ecosystems, and emerging contaminants such as gadolinium, silver, and platinum need close attention, as their fate, toxicity and distributions are not well known (Hatje et al., 2018;Henderson et al., 2018).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Biogeochemistry, Ecosystems, and Pollution
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Moored surface buoys have even coarser horizontal and vertical resolutions than Argo, but uniquely make colocated high-temporal-resolution measurements of the upper ocean and near-surface atmosphere.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Strengths and Weaknesses of the Current Observing System
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In 2017 and 2018, full-depth CTD-O 2 -ADCP casts, along with water sample analyses of salinity, O 2 , pH, nutrients, and trace elements, were performed during the western Atlantic PIRATA servicing cruises.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Repeat Hydrographic Surveys and Ships of Opportunity
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Equatorially forced waves propagate along the southwestern African coast, triggering substantial thermocline, halocline, and nutricline displacements and affecting the local marine ecosystems balance, while tropical nutrient-rich and low-oxygen water masses may occasionally penetrate southward over large distances along the coast.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Biogeochemistry, Ecosystems, and Pollution
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A transition to the next-generation tropical flex moorings (T-Flex) began in 2015.Currently, 10 PIRATA buoys have been upgraded and the remaining eight will follow (Figure 2).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Moored Buoys
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Multi-frequency transects collected during the regular maintenance cruises of the PIRATA network since 2015 are a key piece of a growing acoustic network for estimating the global biomass of micronekton, one of the less known components of the ocean ecosystem.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Repeat Hydrographic Surveys and Ships of Opportunity
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the tropical North Atlantic, PIRATA moorings are located in the central and eastern basin (east of 40 • W), where seasonal and interannual SST signals are largest, especially those associated with the AMM and AZM.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Strengths and Weaknesses of the Current Observing System
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The vertical spacing of temperature sensors varies between moorings and is typically 5-20 m in the upper 40 m, with 20 m intervals down to 140 m and 40-200 m resolution between 140 and 500 m.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Moored Buoys
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In contrast, Argo provides subsurface information, but at coarser horizontal resolution than satellites.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Strengths and Weaknesses of the Current Observing System
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Several moorings also measure downward longwave radiation, atmospheric pressure, and ocean currents at a depth of 10 m or 12 m.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Moored Buoys
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The quote only partly states this claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“By combining data from several satellites with in situ measurements, daily maps of SST at high spatial resolution (0.25 • or better) are possible going back to 1997, when microwave measurements started.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Satellite Observations
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Measurements began in the early 2000's and there are currently approximately 4000 floats in the global ocean.About 800 floats must be deployed each year to maintain the array.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Argo
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“NTAS has been operational since 2001 and measures the same parameters as the PIRATA buoys (surface meteorology including longwave radiation and atmospheric pressure), plus ocean currents from a point meter at 10 m and an upward-looking ADCP at 100 m, and enhanced vertical resolutions of temperature and salinity.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Moored Buoys
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“However, the vertical resolutions of temperature sensors on PIRATA moorings are not high enough to resolve the vertical structure of the mixed layer diurnal cycle, which can affect the mean state climate and vertical mixing (Ham et al., 2009;Hummels et al., 2013).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Strengths and Weaknesses of the Current Observing System
What the sources say
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Global Drifter Program (GDP) observations from buoys drogued at 15 m were first collected in the tropical Atlantic in 1990, and the array was sustained beginning in 1997 (Figure 2).”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Surface Drifting Buoys
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Scatterometers measure the effects of centimeterscale roughness caused by surface stress, but the present retrieval algorithms generate estimates of surface wind, not wind stress, because there are no suitable surface wind stress ground-truths for calibration.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Satellite Observations
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The deep Argo array currently consists of 69 floats, 9 of which are in the tropical Atlantic (Figure 2B).The project's goal is to deploy 1228 deep Argo floats globally, each with the ability to measure temperature, salinity, and pressure to within ±0.001 • C, ±0.002 psu, and ± 3 dbar, respectively, improving on the standard float accuracies of temperature and salinity.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Argo
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Zilberman and Roemmich, 2017
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, few of these observations are being collected by drifters in the tropical Atlantic.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Surface Drifting Buoys
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Satellites give global coverage but only at the surface of the ocean and generally do not resolve timescales less than one day.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Strengths and Weaknesses of the Current Observing System
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Conductivity is additionally measured with 5-20 m spacing in the upper 40 m and 20-80 m spacing down to 120 m.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Moored Buoys
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Satellite-based measurements of SSS began in 2009 with the launch of the SMOS sensor.SSS was measured by Aquarius during 2011-2015 and is currently measured by the SMAP radiometer.From these satellites, complete coverage of the tropical Atlantic is achieved in approximately one week at a spatial resolution of 1/2 • -1 • .”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Satellite Observations
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Other moorings in the tropical Atlantic include the Northwest Tropical Atlantic Station for air-sea flux measurements (NTAS) at 15 • N, 51 • W, the Melax air-sea buoy in the Senegalese part of the Canary Current Upwelling System at 14 • N, 17 • W, the Cape Verde Ocean Observatory (CVOO) at 17.6 • N 24.3 • W, and several meteorological and wave buoys maintained by the National Data Buoy Center (NDB”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Moored Buoys
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Traditional zooplankton sampling with nets requires extra ship time, complicating its implementation.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Strengths and Weaknesses of the Current Observing System
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Proposed satellite missions such as the Sea surface KInematics Multiscale monitoring of ocean surface currents (SKIM) have great potential to aid research, data assimilation, and forecasts.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE FUTURE OBSERVING SYSTEM
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Currently, there is no long-term commitment to fund these observations continuously, only to define what constitutes biogeochemical measurements and what should be measured.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Strengths and Weaknesses of the Current Observing System
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Currently, the deep ocean (>2000 m) is very poorly sampled, severely limiting the accuracy with which these quantities can be calculated.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Strengths and Weaknesses of the Current Observing System
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Therefore, the demand for information about the tropical Atlantic Ocean, including subseasonal to seasonal predictions and longer-term projections in a changing climate, is only expected to increase in the future.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > CONCLUSION
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Rests on an assumption: The tropical Atlantic represents a unique and complex mix of many interacting oceanic and climate modes of variability that fluctuate across a wide variety of timescales.
- Rests on an assumption: A large and diverse group of human populations depends on the tropical Atlantic Ocean for sustenance and recreation and is adversely affected by climate-driven changes in precipitation patterns, extreme weather and ocean ecosystems.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Sustaining drifter observations in the tropical Atlantic is difficult as it is a region of net surface divergence.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > CONCLUSION
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The combination of moorings that include subsurface ocean measurements, and other platforms such as gliders and Argo, would advance knowledge and predictability of landfalling hurricanes.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE FUTURE OBSERVING SYSTEM
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: The northwestern tropical Atlantic warm pool is a region through which a high percentage of landfalling hurricanes pass.
- Rests on an assumption: There is strong upper-ocean salinity stratification in the northwestern tropical Atlantic warm pool.
- Rests on an assumption: There are energetic mesoscale fronts and eddies in the northwestern tropical Atlantic warm pool that affect air-sea fluxes and mixing.
- Rests on an assumption: The mesoscale fronts and eddies in the northwestern tropical Atlantic warm pool are poorly understood.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The tropical Atlantic observing system generates large quantities of data covering a wide range of temporal and spatial scales and across many platforms.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Strengths and Weaknesses of the Current Observing System
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“PIRATA and other fixed moorings are unique among the observing systems because they can be placed at predefined locations and do not drift.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE FUTURE OBSERVING SYSTEM
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Augmenting moorings with barometers will aid NWP and data assimilation.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE FUTURE OBSERVING SYSTEM
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For forecast improvements, both a long history (with a record of many past events to evaluate forecast skill) and reliable real-time data (to initialize forecasts) are critical.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE FUTURE OBSERVING SYSTEM
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Some PIRATA cruises have only recently begun to measure biogeochemical and biological parameters such as nutrients, pH/alkalinity, and phytoplankton, while others measure only temperature, salinity, and oxygen.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Strengths and Weaknesses of the Current Observing System
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Augmenting the in situ observing system in the STA will help to improve understanding of the AZM, Benguela Niños, and coupled model biases.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE FUTURE OBSERVING SYSTEM
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In situ data provide information on the subsurface ocean and high-accuracy measurements near the airsea interface that can be used to calibrate and validate satellite measurements and to bridge gaps between satellite missions.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE FUTURE OBSERVING SYSTEM
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Continuity of satellite records is critical for maintaining basin-wide surface observations.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE FUTURE OBSERVING SYSTEM
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There are large uncertainties in surface turbulent heat fluxes derived from satellite and reanalysis data (Figure 7), and it is unclear how well existing bulk formulas perform, especially outside of the equatorial region.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Strengths and Weaknesses of the Current Observing System
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These long records in the tropical Atlantic are extremely important for observing ocean-atmosphere variability on interannual to multidecadal timescales and changes in response to global warming.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE FUTURE OBSERVING SYSTEM
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Though not part of the sustained observing system, process studies are essential to improve model parameterizations, identify new scientific phenomena, and develop and test new technologies.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE FUTURE OBSERVING SYSTEM
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, many important datasets remain difficult to find or are stored in formats that are difficult to read or do not contain adequate metadata.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Strengths and Weaknesses of the Current Observing System
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Presently, the sensor spacing is too coarse to accurately calculate mixed layer depth, stratification beneath the mixed layer, and the vertical structure of the diurnal cycle of temperature near the surface.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE FUTURE OBSERVING SYSTEM
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Currently, satellite retrievals of chlorophyll and ocean color are limited by clouds, especially in the ITCZ, providing additional motivation for in situ measurements this region.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Strengths and Weaknesses of the Current Observing System
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The most valuable data for evaluating and improving the methodologies are co-located time series of oceanic and atmospheric data from fixed-point moorings.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE FUTURE OBSERVING SYSTEM
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For ocean state estimates, the PIRATA array is too sparse and the measurements are too shallow to provide constraints on the deeper ocean.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Strengths and Weaknesses of the Current Observing System
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These measurements are needed to compute temperature and salinity advection and the net surface heat flux, important components of the mixed layer heat and salinity budgets.”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE FUTURE OBSERVING SYSTEM
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper relies on this without support.
Many developing countries surrounding the tropical Atlantic Ocean face societal challenges that are compounded by climate variability and change.
“Many developing countries surrounding the tropical Atlantic Ocean face societal challenges that are compounded by climate variability and change (Figure 1).”
The paper relies on this without support.
There are new emerging threats that will require additional scientific knowledge and monitoring capabilities.
“There are new emerging threats that will require additional scientific knowledge and monitoring capabilities.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The increasing occurrence of weather and climate extremes and tipping points in ocean biogeochemistry and ecosystems is occurring.
“These include the increasing occurrence of weather and climate extremes and tipping points in ocean biogeochemistry and ecosystems.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The tropical Atlantic observing system is not designed to resolve all important spatial and temporal scales of variability.
“The tropical Atlantic observing system is not designed to resolve all important spatial and temporal scales of variability.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The observing needs for biogeochemistry, ecosystems, and pollution (long time series of key variables, monitoring pollutants, and fish surveys) are real and unmet.
“The observing needs for biogeochemistry, ecosystems, and pollution include the development of long time series of key variables such as oxygen, CO 2 , chlorophyll, nutrients, and commercial and endangered species, for monitoring and understanding seasonal, interannual, decadal, and longer timescale changes.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The tropical Atlantic observing system's data are used for monitoring, understanding, and predicting weather, climate, and ecosystems.
“This is important not only to increase the usability of the data for advancement of scientific knowledge, but also to improve data assimilation and predictability of weather, climate, and ecosystems.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The leading theories of what generates coupled model biases are sufficiently reliable to guide observing system design.
“Based on the leading theories of what generates coupled model biases, such an improved system may include (1) arrays of nearcoastal buoys and ocean gliders in the Benguela upwelling region, (2) multiplatform measurements of turbulent mixing and the processes that drive it in the equatorial Atlantic, (3) direct measurements of turbulent and radiative air-sea fluxes in the northeastern and”
The paper relies on this without support.
The northwestern tropical Atlantic warm pool is a region through which a high percentage of landfalling hurricanes pass.
“The AWP is a region through which a high percentage of landfalling hurricanes pass.”
The paper relies on this without support.
There is strong upper-ocean salinity stratification in the northwestern tropical Atlantic warm pool.
“There is strong upper-ocean salinity stratification and energetic mesoscale fronts and eddies that affect air-sea fluxes and mixing and yet are poorly understood.”
The paper relies on this without support.
There are energetic mesoscale fronts and eddies in the northwestern tropical Atlantic warm pool that affect air-sea fluxes and mixing.
“There is strong upper-ocean salinity stratification and energetic mesoscale fronts and eddies that affect air-sea fluxes and mixing and yet are poorly understood.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The mesoscale fronts and eddies in the northwestern tropical Atlantic warm pool are poorly understood.
“There is strong upper-ocean salinity stratification and energetic mesoscale fronts and eddies that affect air-sea fluxes and mixing and yet are poorly understood.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The measurements of micronekton collected during the regular maintenance cruises of the PIRATA network are one of the less known components of the ocean ecosystem.
“The measurements of micronekton collected during the regular maintenance cruises of the PIRATA network are one on the less known components of the ocean ecosystem.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Plastics have detrimental impacts on ecosystems.
“Routine measurements of plastics during repeated PIRATA services cruises are also highly recommended, given their detrimental impacts on ecosystems.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Process studies often measure many variables at high resolution for a limited amount of time.
“Process studies often measure many variables at high resolution for a limited amount of time.”
The paper relies on this without support.
PIRATA resolves the fast zonal propagation of oceanic signals along the equator.
“PIRATA resolves the fast zonal propagation of oceanic signals along the equator, while at off-equatorial locations they provide essential measurements across a wide range of climate regimes.”
The paper relies on this without support.
At off-equatorial locations, PIRATA provides essential measurements across a wide range of climate regimes.
“PIRATA resolves the fast zonal propagation of oceanic signals along the equator, while at off-equatorial locations they provide essential measurements across a wide range of climate regimes.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The low-wind, high-rainfall ITCZ is one of the climate regimes sampled by PIRATA.
“These include the lowwind, high-rainfall ITCZ; the northeastern and southeastern areas with cool SSTs, low clouds, and large concentrations of aerosols; and the northwestern tropical Atlantic, characterized by strong upper-ocean salinity stratification, energetic mesoscale variability, and poorly understood shallow convection in the atmosphere.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The northeastern and southeastern areas have cool SSTs, low clouds, and large concentrations of aerosols.
“These include the lowwind, high-rainfall ITCZ; the northeastern and southeastern areas with cool SSTs, low clouds, and large concentrations of aerosols; and the northwestern tropical Atlantic, characterized by strong upper-ocean salinity stratification, energetic mesoscale variability, and poorly understood shallow convection in the atmosphere.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The northwestern tropical Atlantic is characterized by strong upper-ocean salinity stratification, energetic mesoscale variability, and poorly understood shallow convection in the atmosphere.
“These include the lowwind, high-rainfall ITCZ; the northeastern and southeastern areas with cool SSTs, low clouds, and large concentrations of aerosols; and the northwestern tropical Atlantic, characterized by strong upper-ocean salinity stratification, energetic mesoscale variability, and poorly understood shallow convection in the atmosphere.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The tropical Atlantic represents a unique and complex mix of many interacting oceanic and climate modes of variability that fluctuate across a wide variety of timescales.
“The tropical Atlantic represents a unique and complex mix of many interacting oceanic and climate modes of variability that fluctuate across a wide variety of timescales.”
The paper relies on this without support.
A large and diverse group of human populations depends on the tropical Atlantic Ocean for sustenance and recreation and is adversely affected by climate-driven changes in precipitation patterns, extreme weather and ocean ecosystems.
“A large and diverse group of human populations depends on the tropical Atlantic Ocean for sustenance and recreation and is adversely affected by climate-driven changes in precipitation patterns, extreme weather and ocean ecosystems.”
The paper relies on this without support.
There has been substantial progress in building and maintaining the sustained observing system over the past 20 years.
“There has been substantial progress in building and maintaining the sustained observing system over the past 20 years.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The tropical Atlantic is strongly influenced by conditions in the Pacific and Indian Oceans as well as the extratropical North and South Atlantic.
“The tropical Atlantic is strongly influenced by conditions in the Pacific and Indian Oceans as well as the extratropical North and South Atlantic.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > Surface Drifting Buoys
“Global Drifter Program (GDP) observations from buoys drogued at 15 m were first collected in the tropical Atlantic in 1990, and the array was sustained beginning in 1997”
§ The Tropical Atlantic Observing System > CONCLUSION
“Surface drifter measurements in the tropical Atlantic began in 1997.”
Citations
Cites
The ERA‐Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system
Dee, D. P., Uppala, S. M., Simmons, A. J., Berrisford, P., Poli, P., Kobayashi, S., Andrae, U., Balmaseda, M. A., Balsamo, G., Bauer, P., et al. (2011) · Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society · doi:10.1002/qj.828 · Cited by 24,480 · cited 2×
“The reference data sets are the Global Precipitation Climatology Project (Adler et al., 2003) for precipitation, the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts Interim Reanalysis (Dee et al., 2011) for surface winds, and Reynolds optimally interpolated dataset (Reynolds et al., 2002) for SST. possibility is an…”
BackgroundSelf-citationSpreading dead zones and consequences for marine ecosystems
Diaz, R. J., & Rosenberg, R. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1156401 · Cited by 6,626
Adler, R. F., Huffman, G. J., Chang, A. T. C., Ferraro, R. R., Xie, P., Janowiak, J. E., Rudolf, B., Schneider, U., Curtis, S., Bolvin, D. T., et al. (2003) · Journal of Hydrometeorology · doi:10.1175/1525-7541(2003)004 · Cited by 5,422
The pollution of the marine environment by plastic debris: a review.
Derraik, J. G. B. (2002) · Marine Pollution Bulletin · doi:10.1016/s0025-326x(02)00220-5 · Cited by 4,042 · cited 1×
“Their threats to marine life are primarily mechanical, due to ingestion of plastics and entanglement (Derraik, 2002).”
BackgroundIncreasing destructiveness of tropical cyclones over the past 30 years.
Emanuel, K. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03906 · Cited by 4,013 · cited 1×
“There are indications that TC activity and intensification before landfall may be increasing in the Atlantic due to global warming (Emanuel, 2005, 2017; Webster et al., 2005; Elsner et al., 2008).”
BackgroundGlobal warming and changes in drought
Trenberth, K. E., Dai, A., van der Schrier, G., Jones, P. D., Barichivich, J., Briffa, K. R., & Sheffield, J. (2014) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate2067 · Cited by 3,382
Changes in tropical cyclone number, duration, and intensity in a warming environment
Webster, P. J., Holland, G. J., Curry, J. A., & Chang, H.-R. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1116448 · Cited by 3,237
Tropical cyclones and climate change
Knutson, T. R., McBride, J. L., Chan, J., Emanuel, K., Holland, G., Landsea, C., Held, I., Kossin, J. P., Srivastava, A. K., & Sugi, M. (2010) · Nature Geoscience · doi:10.1038/ngeo779 · Cited by 3,194
A hierarchical approach to defining marine heatwaves
Hobday, A. J., Alexander, L. V., Perkins, S. E., Smale, D. A., Straub, S. C., Oliver, E. C. J., Benthuysen, J. A., Burrows, M. T., Donat, M. G., Feng, M., et al. (2016) · Progress in Oceanography · doi:10.1016/j.pocean.2015.12.014 · Cited by 2,377
Spatial and temporal patterns of mass bleaching of corals in the Anthropocene
Hughes, T. P., Anderson, K. D., Connolly, S. R., Heron, S. F., Kerry, J. T., Lough, J., Baird, A. H., Baum, J. K., Berumen, M. L., Bridge, T. C. L., et al. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aan8048 · Cited by 2,298
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- Bretagnon, 2018, Inférence De l’activité Biogéochimique Dans La Zone de Minimum d’Oxygène du Pérou
- Liu, 1996, Equivalent Neutral Wind., 17
- Nicholson, 2000, An analysis of recent rainfall conditions in West Africa, including the rainy seasons of the 1997 El Nino and the 1998 La Nina years., J. Clim., 13, 2628, 10.1175/1520-0442(2000)013<2628:AAORRC>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- Reynolds, 2002, An improved in situ and satellite SST analysis for climate., J. Clim., 15, 1609, 10.1175/1520-0442(2002)015<1609:AIISAS>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- Ruiz-Barradas, 2000, Structure of interannual-to-decadal climate variability in the tropical Atlantic sector., J. Clim., 13, 3285, 10.1175/1520-0442(2000)013<3285:SOITDC>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- Sultan, 2003, The West African monsoon dynamics. Part II: the “preonset” and “onset” of the summer monsoon., J. Clim., 16, 3407, 10.1175/1520-0442(2003)016<3407:TWAMDP>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- Visbeck, 2015, More integrated and more sustainable atlantic ocean observing system (AtlantOS)., CLIVAR Exch., 67, 18
- Wallace, 1989, The influence of sea- surface temperature on surface wind in the eastern equatorial Pacific: seasonal and interannual variability., J. Clim., 2, 1492, 10.1175/1520-0442(1989)002<1492:TIOSST>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- Xie, 2004, Tropical Atlantic variability: patterns, mechanisms, and impacts, Earth’s Climate
- Young, 1987, Boundary Layer Dynamics of Tropical and Monsoonal Flows. Monsoon Meteorology., 461
- Zebiak, 1993, Air–sea interaction in the equatorial Atlantic region., J. Climate, 6, 1567, 10.1175/1520-0442(1993)006<1567:AIITEA>2.0.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
- Zilberman, 2017, The argo program samples the deep ocean., US CLIVAR Variat., 2, 29
Cited by
Sorted by citations
On the Future of Argo: A Global, Full-Depth, Multi-Disciplinary Array
Roemmich, D. H., Alford, M. H., Claustre, H., Johnson, K. S., King, B., Moum, J. N., Oke, P. R., Owens, W. B., Pouliquen, S., Purkey, S. G., et al. (2019) · Frontiers in Marine Science · doi:10.3389/fmars.2019.00439 · Cited by 555
Self-citationJohns, E. M., Lumpkin, R., Putman, N. F., Smith, R. H., Muller-Karger, F. E., Rueda-Roa, D. T., Hu, C., Wang, M., Brooks, M. T., Gramer, L. J., et al. (2020) · Progress In Oceanography · doi:10.1016/j.pocean.2020.102269 · Cited by 259
Self-citationSloyan, B. M., Wanninkhof, R. H., Kramp, M., Johnson, G. C., Talley, L. D., Tanhua, T., McDonagh, E. L., Cusack, C. K., O’Rourke, E., McGovern, E., et al. (2019) · Frontiers in Marine Science · doi:10.3389/fmars.2019.00445 · Cited by 165
Self-citationImpacts of teleconnection patterns on South America climate
Reboita, M. S., Ambrizzi, T., Crespo, N. M., Dutra, L. M. M., Ferreira, G. W. D. S., Rehbein, A., Drumond, A. R. D. M., da Rocha, R. P., & de Souza, C. A. (2021) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/nyas.14592 · Cited by 172
Monerie, P., Wainwright, C. M., Sidibé, M., & Akinsanola, A. A. (2020) · Climate Dynamics · doi:10.1007/s00382-020-05332-0 · Cited by 130
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Foltz, G. R., Brandt, P., Richter, I., Rodríguez-Fonseca, B., Hernandez, F., Dengler, M., Rodrigues, R. R., Schmidt, J. O., Yu, L., Lefevre, N., Da Cunha, L. C., McPhaden, M. J., Araujo, M., Karstensen, J., Hahn, J., Martín-Rey, M., Patricola-DiRosario, C. M., Poli, P., Zuidema, P., Hummels, R., Perez, R. C., Hatje, V., Lübbecke, J. F., Polo, I., Lumpkin, R., Bourlès, B., Asuquo, F. E., Lehodey, P., Conchon, A., Chang, P., Dandin, P., Schmid, C., Sutton, A., Giordani, H., Xue, Y., Illig, S., Losada, T., Grodsky, S. A., Gasparin, F., Lee, T., Mohino, E., Nobre, P., Wanninkhof, R., Keenlyside, N., Garcon, V., Sánchez-Gómez, E., Nnamchi, H. C., Drévillon, M., Storto, A., Remy, E., Lazar, A., Speich, S., Goes, M., Dorrington, T., Johns, W. E., Moum, J. N., Robinson, C., Perruche, C., de Souza, R. B., Gaye, A. T., López-Parages, J., Monerie, P.-A., Castellanos, P., Benson, N. U., Hounkonnou, M. N., Duhá, J. T., Laxenaire, R., & Reul, N.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Marine Science
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2019-05-10
- Volume
- 6
- ISSN
- 2296-7745 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2941834759
- Semantic Scholar
- ce9426756d98a06d013c4e74fa3ec0f8ceb3f6f2
- Cited by
- 150
- References
- 385
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 8
- FWCI
- 11.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Frontiers in Marine Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel (GEOMAR) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
- UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- CentAUR (University of Reading) (acceptedVersion)
- HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Docta Complutense (Universidad Complutense de Madrid) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) (submittedVersion)
- Institutional Archive of Ifremer (French Research Institute for Exploitation of the Sea) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Open Access Server of the Woods Hole Scientific Community (Woods Hole Scientific Community) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- NOAA Institutional Repository (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Biblioteca Digital da Memória Científica do INPE (National Institute for Space Research) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine Plankton and Biogeochemistry
- Keywords
- PIRATA, ocean observing systems, Atlantic meridional overturning circulation, multidecadal variability, interannual to decadal variability, climate change, air-sea CO2 flux, Amazon River plume, eastern boundary upwelling, equatorial upwelling, hurricanes, ocean biogeochemistry, vertical mixing, data sharing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-16, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-16 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review