The DOI matches its Crossref record; 170 of the 170 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 72 of the 225 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries
Open accessAbstract
Among various rechargeable batteries, the lithium-ion battery (LIB) stands out due to its high energy density, long cycling life, in addition to other outstanding properties. However, the capacity of LIB drops dramatically at low temperatures (LTs) below 0 °C, thus restricting its applications as a reliable power source for electric vehicles in cold climates and equipment used in the aerospace. The electrolyte engineering has proved to be one of the most effective approaches to mitigate LIB performance degradation at LTs. In this review, we summarize the important factors contributing to the deterioration in Li + transport and capacity utilization at LTs while systematically categorize the solvents, salts and additives reported in the literature. Strategies to improve the Li + transport kinetics, in the bulk electrolyte and across the interphases, are discussed. In particular, the formation mechanism of solid electrolyte interphase and its functionality for LT electrolytes are analyzed. Perspectives on the future evolution of this area are also provided. Graphical abstract
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This review synthesizes mechanisms and electrolyte-engineering strategies for low-temperature lithium-ion and lithium metal batteries, emphasizing that interphasial charge transfer—especially desolvation and SEI transport—dominates subzero performance. It catalogs solvents, salts, and additives that improve bulk conductivity and interphase chemistry, with reported capacity retentions from −20 to −60 °C.
Key findings
- Low-temperature degradation is not only a bulk-electrolyte conductivity problem: charge-transfer/interphasial resistance becomes rate-determining, with desolvation barriers of 50–70 kJ mol⁻¹ and higher discharged-state Rct making charging at low temperature especially difficult.
- Solvent engineering improves performance: ternary EC:DMC:DEC (1:1:1) showed the highest ionic conductivity at −20 °C and largest discharge capacity versus EC:DMC and EC:DEC; optimized EC:DMC:EMC (8.3:25:66.7 wt) achieved 90% capacity at −40 °C; MP-based electrolyte with FEC delivered >60% RT capacity at −60 °C and 1 C; a graphite||graphite dual-ion battery retained 93.1% and 84.4% of RT capacity at −40 and −60 °C.
- Additives and salts can lower interphase impedance: LiDFBOP increased −30 °C capacity retention from 14% to 49% and 200-cycle retention at 0 °C from 57% to 94%; LiPO₂F₂ gave 71.9% vs 49.4% retention at −20 °C and 91% vs ~16% after 100 cycles; EMI-BF₄ gave 45.8% vs 16.3% at −30 °C; LiFSI additive suppressed Li plating and delivered ~30% higher capacity at −20 °C.
- LiF-rich/anion-derived SEIs are generally considered beneficial, but the role of LiF and inorganic content remains controversial: some studies report lower impedance with fewer inorganic species, while others emphasize LiF as critical for good SEI.
Methods
- Design: narrative review, not a primary experimental study; it synthesizes literature on low-temperature electrolytes for lithium-ion and lithium metal batteries.
- Data/sample: published studies and tables categorizing solvents, salts, and molecular/ionic additives; no new samples or measurements are reported.
- Analysis: mechanistic synthesis of Li⁺ transport through bulk electrolyte, desolvation, and SEI/CEI diffusion, using cited EIS/Arrhenius data and performance metrics across different cell chemistries.
Limitations
- Stated: precise knowledge of SEI formation mechanism, Li⁺ conduction mechanism in SEI, and composition/structure/morphology–performance correlations remains little understood; efforts are still mainly empirical.
- Stated: most SEI characterization relies on surface-sensitive XPS with limited elemental information, and conclusions based only on XPS may need re-examination with techniques such as NMR, XRD/PDF, neutron diffraction/PDF, and cryo-TEM.
- Stated/evident: performance comparisons across tables are limited because results from different chemistries and cell designs are not comparable; most Li-plating diagnostics are at coin-cell level and not easily applied to pouch cells or real-time detection.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
131 No full text of the sources · 56 No basis given · 33 Supported · 26 Partly supported · 20 Own interpretation · 5 Not checked yet · 4 Own result · 2 Supported so far · 2 Not supported · 2 Couldn’t confirm · 1 Mixed support · 1 Own method · accuracy not yet measured
At least one cited source doesn’t support this claim or points to a different paper, and none confirmed it — see the verdicts below.
In the paper
“Using the same salt LiPF 6 , the AN-based electrolyte has an ionic conductivity more than twice the value of the EC-DMC-based electrolyte at RT [52].”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.2.1 Nitrile
What the sources say
- Disputedcites [52] Cho, Y.G., Kim, Y.S., Sung, D.G., et al.: Nitrile-assistant eutectic electrolytes for cryogenic operation of lithium ion batteries at fast charges and discharges. Energy Environ. Sci. 7, 1737–1743 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1039/C3EE43029D sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Section 3.1 (page not indicated in our copy) reports room-temperature ionic conductivities of 20.5 mS cm⁻¹ for the acetonitrile-containing electrolyte and 11.33 mS cm⁻¹ for the EC–DMC control. Both used 1 M LiPF6, but 20.5 is about 1.81 times 11.33, not more than twice. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Disputed
Some cited sources support this claim and some don’t — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Furthermore, in addition to the sulfur-containing additives mentioned above, elemental sulfur and allyl disulfide were also reported to have the capability to reduce SEI impedance as well, which can effectively improve LT battery performance [116,117].”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 4.1 Molecular Additives
What the sources say
- Disputedcites [116] Jurng, S., Kim, H.S., Lee, J.G., et al.: Low-temperature characteristics and film-forming mechanism of elemental sulfur additive on graphite negative electrode. J. Electrochem. Soc. 163, A223–A228 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0421602jes sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results and Discussion report better low-temperature performance with elemental sulfur, but attribute it to lower charge-transfer resistance, not lower SEI resistance. They state that SEI resistance was higher for the sulfur-added electrode. The cited paper studies elemental sulfur, not allyl disulfide. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
- Partly supportedcites [117] Jurng, S., Park, S., Yoon, T., et al.: Low-temperature performance improvement of graphite electrode by allyl sulfide additive and its film-forming mechanism. J. Electrochem. Soc. 163, A1798–A1804 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0051609jes sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Abstract reports improved low-temperature graphite performance with elemental sulfur, and Results and Discussion reports a comparable improvement with allyl disulfide. Neither passage establishes that these two additives reduce SEI impedance. The paper attributes its measured impedance benefit for allyl sulfide to lower charge-transfer resistance, a different quantity (Results and Discussion, Table I; page numbers unavailable). (LLM, conf=0.88)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Disputed
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Meanwhile, high oxidation stability of this electrolyte enabled stable graphite||graphite cycling with the upper voltage cutoff at 5.2 V for the storage of PF 6 -anion in graphite at the cathode side.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.1.2 Carboxylic Esters
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [43] Holoubek, J., Yin, Y.J., Li, M.Q., et al.: Exploiting mechanistic solvation kinetics for dual-graphite batteries with high power output at extremely low temperature. Angewandte Chemie Int. Ed. 58, 18892–18897 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201912167 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Accepted Manuscript reports high oxidative stability for the MP-based electrolyte containing 10% FEC. The Angewandte Chemie International Edition section reports stable graphite||graphite full-cell cycling and PF6− storage in graphite at approximately 4.6–5.2 V versus Li/Li+. It does not identify 5.2 V as the full cell’s upper voltage cutoff; that number describes the positive electrode’s potential versus Li/Li+. (LLM, conf=0.87)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“However, it could not be used in graphite anode contained battery systems as the major/single solvent due to the solvent co-intercalation and exfoliation of the graphite anodes [30,31].”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.1.1 Carbonates
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [30] Wang, L.N., Menakath, A., Han, F.D., et al.: Identifying the components of the solid-electrolyte interphase in Li-ion batteries. Nat. Chem. 11, 789–796 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-019-0304-z sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Section 1.4 describes graphite-electrode tests using DMC and EC electrolytes, but does not address propylene carbonate. Searches for propylene carbonate, co-intercalation, and exfoliation found no passage supporting the claimed restriction or its cause. Page numbers were not available in the indexed passages. (LLM, conf=0.74)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [31] Xing, L.D., Zheng, X.W., Schroeder, M., et al.: Deciphering the ethylene carbonate-propylene carbonate mystery in Li-ion batteries. Acc. Chem. Res. 51, 282–289 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.7b00474 source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Could not verify
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“As a result, this graphite||graphite dual-ion battery (DIB) retained 93.1% and 84.4% of its RT capacity at -40 and -60 °C, respectively (Fig. 6b).”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.1.2 Carboxylic Esters
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [43] Holoubek, J., Yin, Y.J., Li, M.Q., et al.: Exploiting mechanistic solvation kinetics for dual-graphite batteries with high power output at extremely low temperature. Angewandte Chemie Int. Ed. 58, 18892–18897 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201912167 source
The main text reports that the graphite||graphite DIB retained 93.1% and 84.4% of its room-temperature capacity at −40 °C and −60 °C, respectively. The Figure 3 caption identifies these as discharge measurements at a 1 C rate; the citing paper’s “Fig. 6b” is its own figure reference, not a conflicting result. (LLM, conf=0.95)
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“This means at high charge rates the speed of Li + transport in the electrolyte cannot catch up with the Li + entering the electrode, resulting in a steep Li + concentration profile at the interphase limiting the LIB performance [7,8].”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 1 Introduction
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [7] Fong, K.D., Self, J., Diederichsen, K.M., et al.: Ion transport and the true transference number in nonaqueous polyelectrolyte solutions for lithium ion batteries. ACS Cent. Sci. 5, 1250–1260 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.9b00406 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [8] Piao, N., Gao, X.N., Yang, H.C., et al.: Challenges and development of lithium-ion batteries for low temperature environments. eTransportation 11, 100145 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.etran.2021.100145 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“The stable interphase formed by FEC combined with high bulk electrolyte conductivity contributed by MP enabled greatly improved performance, delivering over 60% RT capacity at -60 °C and 1 C rate (Fig. 6a).”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.1.2 Carboxylic Esters
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [43] Holoubek, J., Yin, Y.J., Li, M.Q., et al.: Exploiting mechanistic solvation kinetics for dual-graphite batteries with high power output at extremely low temperature. Angewandte Chemie Int. Ed. 58, 18892–18897 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201912167 source
Split into 2 atoms — 2 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Moreover, the energy density and power density of LIBs at -40 °C can only retain a very small percentage of their values at RT, respectively [4].”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 1 Introduction
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [4] Nagasubramanian, G.: Electrical characteristics of 18 650 Li-ion cells at low temperatures. J. Appl. Electrochem. 31, 99–104 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004113825283 source
Page 1 compares Panasonic 18650 Li-ion cells at 25°C and -40°C: delivered energy density falls from about 100 to 5 Wh/l, and power density from about 800 to less than 10 W/l. The Charge/Discharge Characteristics section (p. 7) also reports that both delivered energy and power decrease with temperature and that performance at -40°C is very poor. (LLM, conf=0.93)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“They suggested that the melting point of the mixed solvent is related to the composition, the melting point of each component, and the relative content.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.1.1 Carbonates
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [18] Ding, M.S.: Liquid-solid phase diagrams of ternary and quaternary organic carbonates. J. Electrochem. Soc. 151, A731 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1149/1.1690782 source
The opening discussion says that component melting points anchor the liquidus surface of a ternary mixture, while a quaternary solvent’s liquidus temperature varies with composition. The Liquidus Surface of Selected Ternary Carbonates section describes how adding different amounts of the other components changes that surface. The paper calls the mixture’s lower liquid-range boundary its liquidus temperature rather than its melting point. (LLM, conf=0.91)
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Chen's group [44] further demonstrated stable charge and discharge performance of NMC111-graphite pouch cell in MP-based electrolyte at the subzero temperatures of -20 and -40 °C.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.1.2 Carboxylic Esters
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [44] Cho, Y.G., Li, M.Q., Holoubek, J., et al.: Enabling the low-temperature cycling of NMC||graphite pouch cells with an ester-based electrolyte. ACS Energy Lett. 6, 2016–2023 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.1c00484 source
The paper’s summary states that NMC111||graphite pouch cells using an MP-based electrolyte showed improved capacity retention and Coulombic efficiency at both -20 and -40 °C. The cycling-results passages report stable charge and discharge performance at -20 °C and stable capacity retention and Coulombic efficiency at -40 °C. Page numbers are not provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.94)
boostedSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“The electrolytes using EMC as the single solvent can even work on graphite anodes without EC when LiAsF 6 salt was used [24].”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.1.1 Carbonates
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [24] Ein-Eli, Y., Thomas, S.R., Koch, V., et al.: Ethylmethylcarbonate, a promising solvent for Li-ion rechargeable batteries. J. Electrochem. Soc. 143, L273–L277 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1149/1.1837293 source
The Results and Discussion report that graphite electrodes cycle well in single-solvent EMC and that their performance in pure EMC with 1 M LiAsF6 is as good as in EMC–EC mixtures. The Fig. 1 caption also identifies the EMC–LiAsF6 graphite-cycling experiment. This supports the claim that the electrolyte works without EC; it does not imply that EC offers no improvement. (LLM, conf=0.94)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“MPC electrolyte could enable reversible lithium intercalation into the graphite anode.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.1.1 Carbonates
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [28] Ein-Eli, Y., McDevitt, S.F., Aurbach, D., et al.: Methyl propyl carbonate: a promising single solvent for Li-ion battery electrolytes. J. Electrochem. Soc. 144, L180–L184 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1149/1.1837792 source
The Results and Discussion (Fig. 1, p. L181) report intercalation–deintercalation cycles of a graphite electrode in MPC/1 M LiPF6. The authors explicitly conclude that graphite electrodes cycle reversibly in the single-solvent MPC electrolyte. (LLM, conf=0.94)
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“They showed that EMC can form much stabler SEI on graphite than DMC.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.1.1 Carbonates
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [23] Ein-Eli, Y., McDevitt, S.F., Laura, R.: The superiority of asymmetric alkyl methyl carbonates. J. Electrochem. Soc. 145, L1–L3 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1149/1.1838196 source
The Introduction (page unavailable) says EMC electrolytes form highly efficient passivating layers on graphite that confer high cycling stability, and describes EMC as superior to other alkyl carbonates. The Results and Discussion table (page unavailable) reports poor graphite performance with DMC versus substantially better performance with EMC, supporting the paraphrased comparison. (LLM, conf=0.85)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Meanwhile, the Li + (DEE) 1.8 complexes possessed a much lower binding energy of -280 kJ mol -1 than that of Li + (DME) 2.3 (-414 kJ mol -1 ) formed in 1 M LiFSI in DOL-DME electrolytes shown in Fig. 8a.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.2.2 Ethers
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [57] Holoubek, J., Liu, H.D., Wu, Z.H., et al.: Tailoring electrolyte solvation for Li metal batteries cycled at ultra-low temperature. Nat. Energy (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-021-00783-z source
The Electrolyte Solvation Structure and Performance Impact section reports calculated binding energies of −280 kJ mol−1 for Li+(DEE)1.8 and −414 kJ mol−1 for Li+(DME)2.3. It identifies the DME-coordinated system as 1 M LiFSI in DOL/DME and the DEE-coordinated system as 1 M LiFSI in DEE; the energies are presented as qualitative indicators of desolvation barriers. (LLM, conf=0.93)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Different from typical solvent-separated ion pair (SSIP) solvation structure, DEE electrolytes presented characteristic CIPs with 1.8 DEE oxygens and 2.0 FSI -oxygens per Li + .”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.2.2 Ethers
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [57] Holoubek, J., Liu, H.D., Wu, Z.H., et al.: Tailoring electrolyte solvation for Li metal batteries cycled at ultra-low temperature. Nat. Energy (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-021-00783-z source
The “Electrolyte Solvation Structure and Performance Impact” section reports that MD simulations found a characteristic contact-ion-pair structure in 1 M LiFSI DEE, with average coordination numbers of 1.8 DEE oxygens and 2.0 FSI− oxygens per Li+. It contrasts this with the solvent-separated ion-pair structure of 1 M LiFSI in DOL/DME. (LLM, conf=0.95)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“When the electrolytes containing high concentration of these salts are used in Li metal anode cells, they can form salt anion-derived SEI with a LiF-rich component which is beneficial for anode protection and electrochemical performance [104].”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 3 Salts
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [104] Qian, J.F., Henderson, W.A., Xu, W., et al.: High rate and stable cycling of lithium metal anode. Nat. Commun. 6, 6362 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7362 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results section (“Formation of a stable SEI layer”; page not available) reports that a protective SEI forms with 4 M LiFSI-DME and that increasing fluoride content during cycling may result from anion degradation. It does not identify the SEI as LiF-rich or establish the same SEI mechanism for highly concentrated LiTFSI in Li-metal cells; its discussion of concentrated LiTFSI concerns Li|graphite cells. (LLM, conf=0.87)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Recently, Cho et al. [52] introduced nitriles with varying length of alkyl chains and low melting points into EC or EC-DMC-based electrolyte to lower the freezing point of solvent mixtures.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.2.1 Nitrile
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [52] Cho, Y.G., Kim, Y.S., Sung, D.G., et al.: Nitrile-assistant eutectic electrolytes for cryogenic operation of lithium ion batteries at fast charges and discharges. Energy Environ. Sci. 7, 1737–1743 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1039/C3EE43029D source
Section 3.1 describes nitriles with different alkyl-chain lengths and low freezing points as co-solvents for EC/DMC mixtures. Section 3.4 examines their eutectic behavior, and the paper states that freezing-point depression results from combining EC/DMC with propionitrile. Page numbers are not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.90)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Moreover, in all electrolyte systems studied by Cho, 2% FEC was used as SEI additive to relieve the graphite incompatibility issue of nitriles.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.2.1 Nitrile
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [52] Cho, Y.G., Kim, Y.S., Sung, D.G., et al.: Nitrile-assistant eutectic electrolytes for cryogenic operation of lithium ion batteries at fast charges and discharges. Energy Environ. Sci. 7, 1737–1743 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1039/C3EE43029D sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Section 2.1 (page unavailable) states that 2 wt% FEC was used as an SEI-forming agent for the cell tests, supporting the amount and additive role. It does not say FEC was used in every electrolyte measurement or that its purpose was specifically to relieve nitrile–graphite incompatibility. (LLM, conf=0.88)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“The highly improved bulk ion transport properties effectively increased the discharge/charge capacity of graphite||NCA full cells at LT (-20 °C) (Fig. 7b).”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.2.1 Nitrile
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [52] Cho, Y.G., Kim, Y.S., Sung, D.G., et al.: Nitrile-assistant eutectic electrolytes for cryogenic operation of lithium ion batteries at fast charges and discharges. Energy Environ. Sci. 7, 1737–1743 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1039/C3EE43029D source
Section 3.1 reports substantially higher ionic conductivity for the nitrile-containing electrolytes at −20 °C. Section 3.2 reports significantly higher discharge and charge capacities for NCA/graphite full cells using those electrolytes than for controls at that temperature. The paper also notes that conductivity alone does not fully explain the performance improvement. (LLM, conf=0.90)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“In contrast, the Li/SPAN cell using 1 M LiFSI in DOL/DME failed immediately at -60 °C.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.2.2 Ethers
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [57] Holoubek, J., Liu, H.D., Wu, Z.H., et al.: Tailoring electrolyte solvation for Li metal batteries cycled at ultra-low temperature. Nat. Energy (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-021-00783-z sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Full Cell Behavior section (Fig. 6g; page not provided) reports that the Li||SPAN cell using 1 M LiFSI in DOL/DME had no viable capacity output after two cycles at −60 °C. This supports failure at that temperature, but not the claim that it failed immediately. (LLM, conf=0.88)
plaindirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“An effective measure to address this issue is to introduce diluents (i.e., hydrofluoroethers) to form the LHCE which has the advantages of both good SEI formation capability and low viscosity [62,[105][106][107].”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 3 Salts
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [62] Fan, X.L., Ji, X., Chen, L., et al.: All-temperature batteries enabled by fluorinated electrolytes with non-polar solvents. Nat. Energy 4, 882–890 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-019-0474-3 source
- Supportedcites [105] Chen, S.R., Zheng, J.M., Yu, L., et al.: High-efficiency lithium metal batteries with fire-retardant electrolytes. Joule 2, 1548–1558 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2018.05.002 source
The Results and Discussion section reports that adding the fluorinated ether BTFE preserves the concentrated electrolyte’s solvation structure while reducing viscosity from 150 to 2.9 mPa s. It also attributes the electrolyte’s high efficiency and rate capability to a robust, LiF-rich SEI formed in the LHCE. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.91)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [106] Zheng, Y., Soto, F.A., Ponce, V., et al.: Localized high concentration electrolyte behavior near a lithium-metal anode surface. J. Mater. Chem. A 7, 25047–25055 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1039/C9TA08935G source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“However, pouch cells using electrolytes with shorter alkyl chain nitrile (i.e., AN) with a higher ionic conductivity delivered less discharge capacity at the same condition compared with propionitrile (PN), which has the best retention at -20 °C for RT capacity.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.2.1 Nitrile
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [52] Cho, Y.G., Kim, Y.S., Sung, D.G., et al.: Nitrile-assistant eutectic electrolytes for cryogenic operation of lithium ion batteries at fast charges and discharges. Energy Environ. Sci. 7, 1737–1743 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1039/C3EE43029D sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“The electrolyte ionic conductivity was greatly improved after introducing nitriles (Fig. 7a).”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.2.1 Nitrile
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [52] Cho, Y.G., Kim, Y.S., Sung, D.G., et al.: Nitrile-assistant eutectic electrolytes for cryogenic operation of lithium ion batteries at fast charges and discharges. Energy Environ. Sci. 7, 1737–1743 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1039/C3EE43029D source
Section 3.1 (Transport properties of electrolytes) states that adding nitriles to the EC/DMC electrolyte significantly improved ionic conductivity. It reports increases at both room temperature and −20 °C for all three nitrile-containing formulations compared with the control. (LLM, conf=0.94)
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“It was reported that the addition of ionic additive LiFSI can suppress the Li plating compared to the baseline cell.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 4.2 Ionic Additives
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [139] Pham, H.Q., Chung, G.J., Han, J., et al.: Interface stabilization via lithium bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide additive as a key for promoted performance of graphite‖LiCoO2 pouch cell under − 20 °C. J. Chem. Phys. 152, 094709 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5144280 source
The results section reports Li metal particles on the baseline cell’s graphite anode, while the anode cycled with LiFSI had a plating-free surface. The Conclusions likewise state that LiFSI inhibits Li metal plating under the study’s −20 °C conditions. (LLM, conf=0.94)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Strangely, the signature of Li fluoride (LiF) lattice was not detected, even though LiF is considered to be a primary reason for performance enhancement [162].”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 5.2 Understanding the Nature of SEI Layer
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [165] Li, Y.Z., Li, Y.B., Pei, A., et al.: Atomic structure of sensitive battery materials and interfaces revealed by cryo-electron microscopy. Science 358, 506–510 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam6014 source
The passage describing the FEC-containing electrolyte’s SEI (section labeled Abstract, Fig. 4H) explicitly says that the LiF lattice could not be detected. It also states that LiF is considered a primary reason for performance enhancement. (LLM, conf=0.95)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“In the former [164], cryo-EM was reported to outperform other techniques used for characterizing the sensitive chemical composition and spatial distribution of the SEI, as well as the morphology at nanoscale.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 5.2 Understanding the Nature of SEI Layer
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [164] Wang, X.F., Zhang, M.H., Alvarado, J., et al.: New insights on the structure of electrochemically deposited lithium metal and its solid electrolyte interphases via cryogenic TEM. Nano Lett. 17, 7606–7612 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b03606 source
The discussion on p. 2 explicitly says cryo-EM outperforms other techniques for characterizing electrochemically deposited lithium, including the SEI’s chemical composition and spatial distribution at the nanoscale. This supports the citing sentence in its lithium-metal context. (LLM, conf=0.95)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“In contrast, only ~ 175 mAh g -1 was obtained at the same condition for a cell using the electrolyte without FEC (Fig. 14a) [125].”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 4.1 Molecular Additives
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [125] Liu, B.X., Li, B., Guan, S.Y.: Effect of fluoroethylene carbonate additive on low temperature performance of Li-ion batteries. Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. 15, A77 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1149/2.027206esl sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results and Discussion section reports that a cell without FEC had a lower first-cycle discharge capacity at −20 °C than a cell with 2% FEC. It does not give an absolute capacity of approximately 175 mAh g⁻¹, so the cited text supports the comparison but not the claimed number. (LLM, conf=0.83)
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“This difference was attributed to the decreased charge transfer and the SEI impedance after forming LiF-rich SEIs with FEC.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 4.1 Molecular Additives
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [125] Liu, B.X., Li, B., Guan, S.Y.: Effect of fluoroethylene carbonate additive on low temperature performance of Li-ion batteries. Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. 15, A77 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1149/2.027206esl source
The Abstract attributes the improved low-temperature capacity with FEC to reduced charge-transfer resistance and lower SEI-film resistance associated with a LiF-richer film. The Results and Discussion reports lower SEI resistance and evidence of reduced charge-transfer resistance; the Conclusions links improved performance to the LiF-richer SEI. (LLM, conf=0.93)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“By using conventional carbonate electrolyte with FEC as the additive, it was reported that a capacity of ~ 320 mAh g -1 was delivered when a Li/graphite cell was discharged at -20 °C (a 1/15C rate).”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 4.1 Molecular Additives
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [125] Liu, B.X., Li, B., Guan, S.Y.: Effect of fluoroethylene carbonate additive on low temperature performance of Li-ion batteries. Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. 15, A77 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1149/2.027206esl sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Experimental section (page unavailable) describes Li/graphite cells using a carbonate electrolyte with FEC and discharge at −20 °C at 1/15C. Results and Discussion (page unavailable) reports increased discharge capacity with FEC, but our copy gives no value of approximately 320 mAh g⁻¹; a search for 320 did not find it. (LLM, conf=0.86)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Their results show that lithium ethylene mono-carbonate (LEMC), instead of lithium ethylene di-carbonate (LEDC), becomes the major organic components in the SEI on graphite anodes in LiPF 6 -EC/DMC electrolytes, after prolonged cycling.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 5.2 Understanding the Nature of SEI Layer
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [30] Wang, L.N., Menakath, A., Han, F.D., et al.: Identifying the components of the solid-electrolyte interphase in Li-ion batteries. Nat. Chem. 11, 789–796 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-019-0304-z sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Section 1.5 describes analyzing the SEI on graphite after three cycles in LiPF6/EC/DMC, using LEMC and LEDC as reference materials. Supplementary Figure 26 reports that LEMC was more persistent than LEDC in separate reaction tests, but those tests do not establish which compound dominates the graphite SEI. The available passages do not support the claim that LEMC becomes its major organic component after prolonged cycling. (LLM, conf=0.78)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“The amorphous matrix is likely the organic polymer formed by carbonate electrolyte decomposition.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 5.2 Understanding the Nature of SEI Layer
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [165] Li, Y.Z., Li, Y.B., Pei, A., et al.: Atomic structure of sensitive battery materials and interfaces revealed by cryo-electron microscopy. Science 358, 506–510 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam6014 source
Passage [1] states that, in the SEI formed in a carbonate-based EC-DEC electrolyte, crystalline domains are dispersed through an amorphous matrix and that the matrix is likely an organic polymer formed by carbonate electrolyte decomposition. The citing sentence retains the paper’s uncertainty qualifier. (LLM, conf=0.95)
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Some boron-based salts described in Sect.3, such as LiBOB, LiDFOB and similar derivatives, were also used as electrolyte additives due to their good SEI film-forming properties [136, 137].”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 4.2 Ionic Additives
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [136] Smart, M.C., Hwang, C., Krause, F.C., et al.: Wide operating temperature range electrolytes for high voltage and high specific energy Li-ion cells. ECS Trans. 50, 355–364 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1149/05026.0355ecst sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction describes LiBOB as an electrolyte additive among formulations containing SEI-promoting additives. It does not identify LiDFOB or similar boron-based derivatives as additives. The Results and Discussion attribute the LiBOB formulation’s improved performance to a possible cathode electrolyte interface (CEI) effect, rather than demonstrating SEI film formation. (LLM, conf=0.88)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [137] Cappetto, A., Cao, W.J., Luo, J.F., et al.: Performance of wide temperature range electrolytes for Li-Ion capacitor pouch cells. J. Power Sources 359, 205–214 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.05.071 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“These crystalline grains are the inorganic components of the SEI, identified to be Li oxide and Li carbonate by matching their lattice spacings.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 5.2 Understanding the Nature of SEI Layer
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [165] Li, Y.Z., Li, Y.B., Pei, A., et al.: Atomic structure of sensitive battery materials and interfaces revealed by cryo-electron microscopy. Science 358, 506–510 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam6014 source
The passage describing the SEI formed in standard EC-DEC electrolyte states that its crystalline grains are inorganic components identified as Li oxide and Li carbonate by matching lattice spacings (Fig. 4G). The Fig. 4E caption independently describes the same lattice-spacing matches. (LLM, conf=0.95)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“For the first time, cryo-TEM elucidates the nanostructure of the electrochemically deposited Li (EDLi) and its surface SEI film.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 5.2 Understanding the Nature of SEI Layer
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [164] Wang, X.F., Zhang, M.H., Alvarado, J., et al.: New insights on the structure of electrochemically deposited lithium metal and its solid electrolyte interphases via cryogenic TEM. Nano Lett. 17, 7606–7612 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b03606 source
The paper states explicitly on p. 2 that, for the first time, cryo-TEM elucidates the nanostructure of electrochemically deposited Li and its surface film. Its discussion on p. 3 identifies that film as the SEI and describes its observed structure. (LLM, conf=0.95)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“At -40 °C, the Li-LFP cell showed 90% capacity retention after 100 cycles at the cathode-limited areal capacity (5 mAh cm -2 ).”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 4.1 Molecular Additives
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [139] Pham, H.Q., Chung, G.J., Han, J., et al.: Interface stabilization via lithium bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide additive as a key for promoted performance of graphite‖LiCoO2 pouch cell under − 20 °C. J. Chem. Phys. 152, 094709 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5144280 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Experimental Section (page unavailable) describes graphite‖LiCoO₂ pouch cells cycled at −20 °C for 50 cycles, not Li–LFP cells. A search for Li–LFP, −40 °C, 100 cycles, and 5 mAh cm⁻² found no passage reporting the claimed result; the different experiment does not establish that the claimed result is false. (LLM, conf=0.76)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Could not verify
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“In the latter [165], the SEI was revealed to contain small crystalline domains (diameter ~ 3 nm) dispersed randomly throughout an amorphous matrix that coats the Li metal.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 5.2 Understanding the Nature of SEI Layer
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [165] Li, Y.Z., Li, Y.B., Pei, A., et al.: Atomic structure of sensitive battery materials and interfaces revealed by cryo-electron microscopy. Science 358, 506–510 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam6014 source
The passage discussing Fig. 4E (labeled Abstract in our copy) states the claim almost verbatim. It describes the SEI formed on Li metal in the standard EC–DEC electrolyte. (LLM, conf=0.95)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Unfortunately, the benefit of using FEC decreased rapidly during cycling and became insignificant after 25 cycles at -20”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 4.1 Molecular Additives
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [125] Liu, B.X., Li, B., Guan, S.Y.: Effect of fluoroethylene carbonate additive on low temperature performance of Li-ion batteries. Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. 15, A77 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1149/2.027206esl source
The Results and Discussion (page not provided) say FEC had limited effects on specific capacity after 25 cycles at −20 °C and that the cells with and without FEC then had comparable capacity. The same section describes a rapid rise in SEI film resistance during cycling, supporting the reported decline in benefit. (LLM, conf=0.93)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“The SEI formed in this standard electrolyte resembles the mosaic structure predicted by Peled et al. [166], who described the SEI as a heterogeneous distribution of inorganic and organic components.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 5.2 Understanding the Nature of SEI Layer
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [165] Li, Y.Z., Li, Y.B., Pei, A., et al.: Atomic structure of sensitive battery materials and interfaces revealed by cryo-electron microscopy. Science 358, 506–510 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam6014 source
The passage labeled Abstract directly states that the SEI formed in the standard electrolyte resembles the mosaic structure predicted by Peled et al. It also describes that structure as a heterogeneous distribution of inorganic and organic components. (LLM, conf=0.95)
- Supportedcites [166] Peled, E., Golodnitsky, D., Ardel, G.: Advanced model for solid electrolyte interphase electrodes in liquid and polymer electrolytes. J. Electrochem. Soc. 144, L208–L210 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1149/1.1837858 source
The Results and Discussion describes SEI materials forming simultaneously and precipitating as a “mosaic of microphases.” Its examples include inorganic compounds and organic materials, supporting the attributed description of a heterogeneous structure. Whether the citing authors’ SEI resembles that model is their own comparison. (LLM, conf=0.92)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“They also observed a completely different SEI structure when it was formed in a carbonate-based electrolyte with 10% FEC.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 5.2 Understanding the Nature of SEI Layer
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [165] Li, Y.Z., Li, Y.B., Pei, A., et al.: Atomic structure of sensitive battery materials and interfaces revealed by cryo-electron microscopy. Science 358, 506–510 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam6014 source
The passage discussing Fig. 4H explicitly reports a completely different SEI structure in a carbonate-based electrolyte with 10 volume % FEC. It contrasts the more ordered, apparently multilayer structure with the randomly distributed components observed in the standard electrolyte. The supplied copy labels this passage as Abstract; no page number is given. (LLM, conf=0.95)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“Instead of a random distribution of organic and inorganic components, the SEI formed in the presence of FEC is more ordered and appears to have a multilayer structure, consistent with the multilayer system proposed by Aurbach et al. [167].”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 5.2 Understanding the Nature of SEI Layer
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [165] Li, Y.Z., Li, Y.B., Pei, A., et al.: Atomic structure of sensitive battery materials and interfaces revealed by cryo-electron microscopy. Science 358, 506–510 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam6014 source
The passage discussing Fig. 4H states that, compared with the random distribution in the standard electrolyte, the SEI formed with FEC is more ordered and appears multilayered. It explicitly says this is consistent with the multilayer system proposed by Aurbach et al. The supplied copy labels this passage “Abstract” and gives no page number. (LLM, conf=0.95)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [167] Aurbach, D., Ein-Ely, Y., Zaban, A.: The surface chemistry of lithium electrodes in alkyl carbonate solutions. J. Electrochem. Soc. 141, L1–L3 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1149/1.2054718 source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“when cycled between 3.0 and 4.3 V at -20 °C, the cell using LiFSI additive delivered ~ 30% higher capacity than the baseline electrolyte at all rates of 0.1 C, 0.2 C, 0.5 C, 1 C, and 2 C.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 4.2 Ionic Additives
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [139] Pham, H.Q., Chung, G.J., Han, J., et al.: Interface stabilization via lithium bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide additive as a key for promoted performance of graphite‖LiCoO2 pouch cell under − 20 °C. J. Chem. Phys. 152, 094709 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5144280 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Fig. 4 rate-capability discussion reports higher discharge capacities with LiFSI at every listed rate between 0.1 C and 2 C, under −20 °C and between 3.0 and 4.3 V. Its reported values imply increases of about 34% at 0.1 C and 39–46% at the other listed rates, so the claim’s “~30% higher” magnitude does not fit all rates. The supplied passage does not specify a page. (LLM, conf=0.89)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
In the paper
“This resulted in the largest discharge capacity in a graphite||LiCoO 2 cell using the ternary electrolyte (Fig. 4b).”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.1.1 Carbonates
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [20] Smart, M.C., Ratnakumar, B.V., Surampudi, S.: Electrolytes for low-temperature lithium batteries based on ternary mixtures of aliphatic carbonates. J. Electrochem. Soc. 146, 486–492 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1149/1.1391633 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Therefore, in order to effectively improve the LT performance of a LIB, one must simultaneously improve both charge transfer kinetics and bulk electrolyte ionic conductivity.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 1 Introduction
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Smart et al. [22] at Jet Propulsion Laboratory developed a ternary LT electrolyte consisting of 1.0 M LiPF 6 in EC:ethyl methyl carbonate (EMC):methyl propionate (MP) (20:60:20 in volume ratio), which has enabled several NASA missions when incorporated into mesocarbon microbead (MCMB)-graphite-LiNiCoAlO 2 (NCA) cells where good performance was required for charging and discharging from -30 to 35 °”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.1.1 Carbonates
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [22] Smart, M.C., Ratnakumar, B.V., Ewell, R.C., et al.: The use of lithium-ion batteries for JPL’s Mars missions. Electrochim. Acta 268, 27–40 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2018.02.020 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Therefore, the freezing point of different electrolytes can be tuned by adjusting the composition and the content of the solvent.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.1.1 Carbonates
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The widely used EC is based on its high dielectric constant and excellent SEI formation capability.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2 Solvents
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“This electrolyte demonstrated excellent compatibility with both LMA and graphite anode at wide-temperature range with fast charging rates.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.1.2 Carboxylic Esters
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [46] Yang, Y., Fang, Z., Yin, Y., et al.: Synergy of weakly-solvated electrolyte and optimized interphase enables graphite anode charge at low temperature. Angewandte Chemie Int. Ed. 61, e202208345 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202208345 source
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Therefore, it is the interphasial process, rather than the bulk process, that has the dominant influence on the overall LT electrochemical performance.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 1 Introduction
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Linear carbonates and carboxylic esters are always desirable for LT electrolytes, owing to their low viscosity and low melting points (Fig. 3).”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.1 Carbonates and Carboxylic Esters
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In addition to the tunable freezing point, the multi-solvent system owns a higher conductivity than the single-solvent system at LTs due to the disordered effect of Li + coordination in various mixed solvents [19].”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.1.1 Carbonates
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [19] Dong, X.L., Wang, Y.G., Xia, Y.Y.: Promoting rechargeable batteries operated at low temperature. Acc. Chem. Res. 54, 3883–3894 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.1c00420 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, the high viscosity and high freezing point (36.4 °C) of EC negatively affect the ionic conductivity, especially at room or low temperatures.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 1 Introduction
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The electrolyte engineering has proved to be one of the most effective approaches to mitigate LIB performance degradation at LTs.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > Abstract
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“During the whole charge transfer process, desolvation is identified to be the most sluggish step with the highest energy barrier to be overcome in many systems.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 1 Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [10] Xu, K., von Cresce, A., Lee, U.: Differentiating contributions to “ion transfer” barrier from interphasial resistance and Li+ desolvation at electrolyte/graphite interface. Langmuir 26, 11538–11543 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1021/la1009994 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Under such context, the LT limit of electrolyte may not be provided by the lowest melting linear carbonate.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.1.1 Carbonates
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The effect of low t Li + would become especially pronounced at high charge/discharge rates [9].”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 1 Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [9] Qian, Y.X., Chu, Y.L., Zheng, Z.T., et al.: A new cyclic carbonate enables high power/low temperature lithium-ion batteries. Energy Storage Mater. 45, 14–23 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2021.11.029 source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The lithium metal (Li 0 ) plating and dendrite formation on the graphite anode surface, both caused by the increased anode polarization at low temperatures (LTs), can cause severe capacity loss and internal short circuit.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 1 Introduction
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, linear carbonates with low melting points and low viscosity are always introduced as cosolvents to address these issues.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 1 Introduction
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Unfortunately, the most widely used electrolyte solvent, EC, has a high melting point (36.4 °C), which is responsible for the significantly increased electrolyte viscosity at LTs.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2 Solvents
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“and similarly, the more delocalized the charges on the anions are, the less likely they would reassociate with the cations after the salt dissolution.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 1 Introduction
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Xiao et al. [26] systematically compared the different content ratios of EC:DMC:EMC systems and achieved 90% capacity at -40 °C with the optimized solvent ratio (EC:DMC:EMC, 8.3:25:66.7 in weight ratio).”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.1.1 Carbonates
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [26] Xiao, L.F., Cao, Y.L., Ai, X.P., et al.: Optimization of EC-based multi-solvent electrolytes for low temperature applications of lithium-ion batteries. Electrochim. Acta 49, 4857–4863 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2004.05.038 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In addition to ion transport properties, SEI properties vary with the type of linear carbonates introduced.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.1.1 Carbonates
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition to bulk transport properties, Li + transport through solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) is often a limiting factor at LTs.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 1 Introduction
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“When the salt concentration is 4 M, the Li/LiNi 0.5 Mn 1.5 O 4 (LNMO) cell maintained 80.85% of its RT specific discharge capacity even at the LT of -50 °C.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.1.2 Carboxylic Esters
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [45] Feng, T.T., Yang, G.Z., Zhang, S., et al.: Low-temperature and high-voltage lithium-ion battery enabled by localized high-concentration carboxylate electrolytes. Chem. Eng. J. 433, 134138 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.134138 source
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“However, the ion transport across electrode/ electrolyte interphases plays comparable or even more important roles [5].”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 1 Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [5] Zhu, G.L., Wen, K.C., Lv, W.Q., et al.: Materials insights into low-temperature performances of lithium-ion batteries. J. Power Sources 300, 29–40 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.09.056 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In a paper published in 2015, a LIB was reported to have a significant capacity drop down to about one fifth of its RT capacity at -30 °C [5].”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 1 Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [5] Zhu, G.L., Wen, K.C., Lv, W.Q., et al.: Materials insights into low-temperature performances of lithium-ion batteries. J. Power Sources 300, 29–40 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.09.056 source
plaindirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“According to the phase diagrams constructed for the binary systems of these cyclic and linear carbonates, the liquidus lines, which serve as a demarcation between stable liquid electrolyte and onset for solid precipitation, depend not only on the low melting temperature of the individual components, but also on how much these melting temperatures”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.1.1 Carbonates
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As expected, the electrolyte ionic conductivity drops at LTs because of the increased viscosity, rendering sluggish Li + migration in the bulk electrolyte.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 1 Introduction
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“As reported in early 2000, most graphite anode materials can only deliver 12% of room-temperature (RT) capacity when both lithiation and delithiation were carried out at -20 °C [3].”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 1 Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [3] Zhang, S.S., Xu, K., Jow, T.R.: Low temperature performance of graphite electrode in Li-ion cells. Electrochim. Acta 48, 241–246 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-4686(02)00620-5 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“It should be noticed that this is the first attempt to use LHCE for high-voltage Li/LNMO system at LTs.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.1.2 Carboxylic Esters
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [45] Feng, T.T., Yang, G.Z., Zhang, S., et al.: Low-temperature and high-voltage lithium-ion battery enabled by localized high-concentration carboxylate electrolytes. Chem. Eng. J. 433, 134138 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.134138 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Otherwise, Li + transport inside the SEI still plays a significant role in Li + charge transfer kinetics.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 1 Introduction
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These challenges primarily come from the anode side.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 1 Introduction
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These low melting point and low viscosity linear carbonates with stable SEI formation abilities are good candidates as cosolvents and even main solvents for LT applications.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.1.1 Carbonates
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Compared to the two binary electrolytes of 1 M LiPF 6 in EC:DMC (30:70) and 1 M LiPF 6 in EC:DEC (30:70), the ternary electrolyte of 1 M LiPF 6 in EC:DMC:DEC (1:1:1) showed the highest ionic conductivity at -20 °C due to synergistic effect as shown in Fig. 4a.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.1.1 Carbonates
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [20] Smart, M.C., Ratnakumar, B.V., Surampudi, S.: Electrolytes for low-temperature lithium batteries based on ternary mixtures of aliphatic carbonates. J. Electrochem. Soc. 146, 486–492 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1149/1.1391633 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The combination of salts and solvents can influence the transport kinetics of the electrolyte [6].”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 1 Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [6] Xu, K.: Nonaqueous liquid electrolytes for lithium-based rechargeable batteries. ChemInform 35, 5 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1002/chin.200450271 source
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Moreover, the MA-based EC-free electrolyte developed by Zhang's group shows exceptional LT performance [47].”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.1.2 Carboxylic Esters
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [47] Yao, Y.X., Yao, N., Zhou, X.R., et al.: Ethylene-carbonate-free electrolytes for rechargeable Li-ion pouch cells at sub-freezing temperatures. Adv. Mater. 34, 2206448 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202206448 source
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“bis(2,2,2-trifluoroethyl) ether (BTFE) as the diluent, which allows for the modulation of the degree of ion-pairing while maintaining a relatively low bulk viscosity [58].”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.2.2 Ethers
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [58] Holoubek, J., Kim, K., Yin, Y.J., et al.: Electrolyte design implications of ion-pairing in low-temperature Li metal batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 15, 1647–1658 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1039/D1EE03422G source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“As shown in Fig. 9b, SEIs formed by the fluorinated linear carbonates have lower impedance than conventional EC-DEC-based electrolytes.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.2.3 Fluorinated Solvents
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“By adding EG as additive, the LT rate performance of LiFePO 4 cathode at -20 °C has been successfully optimized due to the improved ionic mobility [82].”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.2.6 Aqueous Electrolytes
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [82] Tron, A., Jeong, S., Park, Y.D., et al.: Aqueous lithium-ion battery of nano-LiFePO4 with antifreezing agent of ethyleneglycol for low-temperature operation. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 7, 14531–14538 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b02042 source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“This work suggested that the ionic conductivity of polymer electrolytes is largely affected by the liquid electrolyte components.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.2.4 Gel Polymer Electrolytes
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [72] Smart, M.C., Ratnakumar, B.V., Behar, A., et al.: Gel polymer electrolyte lithium-ion cells with improved low temperature performance. J. Power Sources 165, 535–543 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.10.038 source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The Li||LiNi 0.8 Co 0.15 Al 0.05 O 2 cell can be cycled well using a cutoff voltage of 4.3 V for charging.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.2.3 Fluorinated Solvents
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [62] Fan, X.L., Ji, X., Chen, L., et al.: All-temperature batteries enabled by fluorinated electrolytes with non-polar solvents. Nat. Energy 4, 882–890 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-019-0474-3 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Considering all these parameters, LiPF 6 represents an excellent balanced property compared to other salts, such as LiBF 4 , LiClO 4 , and LiAsF 6 .”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 3 Salts
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In another work reported by Liu's group [86], sulfolane (SL) was selected as the cosolvent of antifreeze and the activity inhibitor of water, because of its low toxicity, high miscibility with water, high oxidation stability and strong interaction with water molecules.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.2.6 Aqueous Electrolytes
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [86] Liu, J.H., Yang, C., Chi, X.W., et al.: Water/sulfolane hybrid electrolyte achieves ultralow-temperature operation for high-voltage aqueous lithium-ion batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 32, 2106811 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202106811 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, excessively large anions can lead to low mobility which is adverse for ion transport, which can be seen in the examples of bis[(pentafluoroethyl)sulfonyl]imide (BETI) or other poly-TFSI anions.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 3 Salts
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“For example, Smart et al. [64] studied a series of fluorinated linear carbonates and found that these electrolytes were able to deliver much higher capacity than the non-fluorinated analogues at -20 °C (Fig. 9a).”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.2.3 Fluorinated Solvents
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [64] Smart, M.C., Ratnakumar, B.V., Ryan-Mowrey, V.S., et al.: Improved performance of lithium-ion cells with the use of fluorinated carbonate-based electrolytes. J. Power Sources 119(120/121), 359–367 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7753(03)00266-0 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Armand et al. [54] proposed a family of “hindered glymes” with bulky groups that prevent solvent co-intercalation due to their larger size and lower binding energy to Li + making the Li + cation desolvation more favorable than co-intercalation.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.2.2 Ethers
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [54] Shanmukaraj, D., Grugeon, S., Laruelle, S., et al.: Hindered glymes for graphite-compatible electrolytes. Chemsuschem 8, 2691–2695 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.201500502 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The gel polymer cell containing electrolyte of 1 M LiPF 6 in EC:DEC:DMC:EMC (1:1:1:3, volume ratio) delivered nearly full (> 99%) RT capacity when discharged at -40 °C using a C/10 rate (Fig. 10a).”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.2.4 Gel Polymer Electrolytes
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [72] Smart, M.C., Ratnakumar, B.V., Behar, A., et al.: Gel polymer electrolyte lithium-ion cells with improved low temperature performance. J. Power Sources 165, 535–543 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.10.038 source
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“LiTFSI and LiFSI salts have attracted a lot of attention recently, due to their high solubility in aprotic solvents enabled by the stabilization of the negative charge provided by the strong electron-withdrawing group (-CF 3 or -F) [6].”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 3 Salts
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [6] Xu, K.: Nonaqueous liquid electrolytes for lithium-based rechargeable batteries. ChemInform 35, 5 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1002/chin.200450271 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Moreover, within the widetemperature range, LMBs retained Coulombic efficiencies of 97.3%, 97.2%, 95.2% and 91.0% at 0, -20, -40 and -60 °C, respectively.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.2.5 Liquified Gas Electrolytes (LGEs)
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [78] Yin, Y.J., Yang, Y., Cheng, D.Y., et al.: Fire-extinguishing, recyclable liquefied gas electrolytes for temperature-resilient lithium-metal batteries. Nat. Energy 7, 548–559 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-022-01051-4 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Meng's group [78] recently developed a novel LGE by adding the simplest (liquefied) ether to a non-flammable lowsolvating hydrofluorocarbon mixture.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.2.5 Liquified Gas Electrolytes (LGEs)
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [78] Yin, Y.J., Yang, Y., Cheng, D.Y., et al.: Fire-extinguishing, recyclable liquefied gas electrolytes for temperature-resilient lithium-metal batteries. Nat. Energy 7, 548–559 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-022-01051-4 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Sulfur-containing compounds, such as 1,3,2-dioxathiolane-2,2-dioxide (DTD) and 1,3-propanesultone (1,3-PS), have been extensively studied as electrolyte additives to form stable SEI layers on graphite and suppress graphite exfoliation in PC-based electrolytes.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 4.1 Molecular Additives
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Such enhanced performance is attributed to the formation of a thin and stable SEI on the surface of graphite to reduce charge transfer resistance [70].”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.2.3 Fluorinated Solvents
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [70] Lu, W., Xiong, S.Z., Xie, K., et al.: Identification of solid electrolyte interphase formed on graphite electrode cycled in trifluoroethyl aliphatic carboxylate-based electrolytes for low-temperature lithium-ion batteries. Ionics 22, 2095–2102 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11581-016-1743-9 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“For example, 1 M LiAsF 6 in EC:EMC:MA:toluene (1:1:1:1, volume ratio) quaternary solvents displayed high ionic conductivity values as 1.830 and 1.100 mS cm -1 at -40 and -50 °C, respectively [94].”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 3 Salts
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [94] Shiao, H.C., Chua, D., Lin, H.P., et al.: Low temperature electrolytes for Li-ion PVDF cells. J. Power Sources 87, 167–173 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7753(99)00470-X source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“After increasing the discharge rate to C/5, this cell still delivered over 94% of RT capacity.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.2.4 Gel Polymer Electrolytes
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [72] Smart, M.C., Ratnakumar, B.V., Behar, A., et al.: Gel polymer electrolyte lithium-ion cells with improved low temperature performance. J. Power Sources 165, 535–543 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.10.038 source
plaindirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“As a result of the beneficial solvation chemistry and a fluorine-rich environment, a lithium cycling at > 99% Coulombic efficiency for over 200 cycles at 3 mA cm -2 and 3 mAh cm -2 was demonstrated.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.2.5 Liquified Gas Electrolytes (LGEs)
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [78] Yin, Y.J., Yang, Y., Cheng, D.Y., et al.: Fire-extinguishing, recyclable liquefied gas electrolytes for temperature-resilient lithium-metal batteries. Nat. Energy 7, 548–559 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-022-01051-4 source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“To combine the good ionic conductivity of LiBF 4 and decent SEI formation capability from LiBOB, a LiBF 4 :LiBOB (9:1, molar ratio) dual-salt system was developed by Xu et al. [99,102], in PC/EC/EMC ternary solvent the Li-LiFePO 4 (LFP) cell showed enhanced cyclic performance in a wide-temperature range from -50 to 90 °C.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 3 Salts
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [99] Zhang, S.S., Xu, K., Jow, T.R.: Enhanced performance of Li-ion cell with LiBF4-PC based electrolyte by addition of small amount of LiBOB. J. Power Sources 156, 629–633 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.04.023 source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [102] Xu, K., Zhang, S.S., Lee, U., et al.: LiBOB: is it an alternative salt for lithium ion chemistry? J. Power Sources 146, 79–85 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.03.153 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This counter-intuitive difference must be attributed to the different interphases formed from the decomposition of these nitriles.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.2.1 Nitrile
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The dual-salt electrolyte with a LiBF 4 :LiDFOB ratio of 8:2 enabled LiCoO 2 cathodes with a high capacity retention of 98.67% at -20 °C after 300 cycles.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 3 Salts
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Lu et al. also explored electrochemical performance of a graphite anode at different subzero temperatures in an electrolyte with 25% TFENH as cosolvent, and demonstrated that at a relatively higher charge rate of 0.2 C, the graphite anode maintained 92% of RT capacity at -50 °C.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.2.3 Fluorinated Solvents
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [70] Lu, W., Xiong, S.Z., Xie, K., et al.: Identification of solid electrolyte interphase formed on graphite electrode cycled in trifluoroethyl aliphatic carboxylate-based electrolytes for low-temperature lithium-ion batteries. Ionics 22, 2095–2102 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11581-016-1743-9 source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The cell using MB-based electrolytes delivered 80% of its RT capacity when discharged at -60 °C (Fig. 10b).”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.2.4 Gel Polymer Electrolytes
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [72] Smart, M.C., Ratnakumar, B.V., Behar, A., et al.: Gel polymer electrolyte lithium-ion cells with improved low temperature performance. J. Power Sources 165, 535–543 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.10.038 source
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Ethylene glycol (EG) is a wellknown antifreeze additive with a high dielectric constant (ε = 37 at 25 °C), which can reduce the freezing point of aqueous electrolyte to be lower than -24 °C.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.2.6 Aqueous Electrolytes
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For these reasons, ethers are usually disfavored as an LT electrolyte solvent for Li + .”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.2.2 Ethers
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The LGE with oxidation stability up to 4.4 V enabled Li/NMC622 cells exhibiting stable cycling properties from -60 to 55 °C.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.2.5 Liquified Gas Electrolytes (LGEs)
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [78] Yin, Y.J., Yang, Y., Cheng, D.Y., et al.: Fire-extinguishing, recyclable liquefied gas electrolytes for temperature-resilient lithium-metal batteries. Nat. Energy 7, 548–559 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-022-01051-4 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the ionic conductivity is not always compromised since some fluorination may lead to higher dielectric constant.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.2.3 Fluorinated Solvents
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Among them, the electrolyte with ethyl-2,2,2-trifluoroethyl carbonate (ETFEC) exhibited the highest delivered capacity [64].”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.2.3 Fluorinated Solvents
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [64] Smart, M.C., Ratnakumar, B.V., Ryan-Mowrey, V.S., et al.: Improved performance of lithium-ion cells with the use of fluorinated carbonate-based electrolytes. J. Power Sources 119(120/121), 359–367 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7753(03)00266-0 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“An expanded electrochemical stability window of 3.8 V has been achieved due to the formation of SL contained solvation sheath and strengthen O-H bond of water, inhibiting the decomposition of water.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.2.6 Aqueous Electrolytes
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [86] Liu, J.H., Yang, C., Chi, X.W., et al.: Water/sulfolane hybrid electrolyte achieves ultralow-temperature operation for high-voltage aqueous lithium-ion batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 32, 2106811 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202106811 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Moreover, it has been reported that some sulfur-containing additives result in SEI layers that are less resistive [33].”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 4.1 Molecular Additives
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [33] Wotango, A., Su, W.N., Haregewoin, A.M., et al.: Designed synergetic effect of electrolyte additives to improve interfacial chemistry of MCMB electrode in propylene carbonate-based electrolyte for enhanced low and room temperature performance. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10, 25252–25262 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b02185 source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition to the usage of low melting point and low viscosity solvents mentioned above, the application of fluorinated solvents which could significantly improve the interphase chemistry and oxidation stability has also been extensively investigated for LT electrolytes.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.2.3 Fluorinated Solvents
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The ionic conductivity is also superior as demonstrated by the fact that even at -85 °C, the cell can still deliver ~ 50 % of its room-temperature capacity.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.2.3 Fluorinated Solvents
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [62] Fan, X.L., Ji, X., Chen, L., et al.: All-temperature batteries enabled by fluorinated electrolytes with non-polar solvents. Nat. Energy 4, 882–890 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-019-0474-3 source
boostedSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Unfortunately, AN has the incompatibility issue with graphite anodes because its reduction product fails to form a solid interphase.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.2.1 Nitrile
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“More importantly, better SEIs could be obtained by using fluorinated electrolytes.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.2.3 Fluorinated Solvents
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“From the cation-anion dissociation perspective for salt selections, larger anions are more desirable than the smaller ones, because the negative charge is more delocalized, which in turn reduces the Coulombic attraction between counterions.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 3 Salts
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition, the poor oxidative stability largely limits the application of ethers in high-voltage rechargeable batteries.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.2.2 Ethers
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For LT electrolyte application, decreasing the interphase impedance is particularly important since it can improve the overall kinetics of the cell and offset the negative effects on transport property caused by the LT.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 3 Salts
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, when it comes to LT application, the high viscosity of high concentration electrolyte (HCE) is a problem.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 3 Salts
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“However, in those cases, the high impedance of oxalate-derived SEI causes another problem for LT electrolytes.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 3 Salts
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“This is because fluorinated solvents can form less resistive SEI compared with their non-fluorinated counterparts.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.2.3 Fluorinated Solvents
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In contrast to the polymer-like SEIs formed in conventional carbonate electrolytes with high impedance, a ceramic-like SEI with high Li mobility through the grain boundaries was generated on Li foil using the FM electrolyte, enabling facile Li transportation through the interphase.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.2.5 Liquified Gas Electrolytes (LGEs)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the reality is that most of the ethers solvate Li + so tightly that the formed solvation cage would not release the coordinated Li + easily.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.2.2 Ethers
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For these two reasons, salts with large anions and high degree of fluorination, such as PF 6 -, BF 4 -, TFSI -and FSI -, are easier to dissociate than those with small anions.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 3 Salts
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“McDowell [56] reported that the Coulombic efficiency of Li metal anodes can be significantly improved at LTs (-60 °C) by adding EC or FEC in the electrolyte of 0.8 M LiTFSI and 0.2 M LiNO 3 in DOL-DME solvents to tailor the solvation structure and SEI properties.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.2.2 Ethers
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [56] Thenuwara, A.C., Shetty, P.P., Kondekar, N., et al.: Efficient low-temperature cycling of lithium metal anodes by tailoring the solid-electrolyte interphase. ACS Energy Lett. 5, 2411–2420 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.0c01209 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Therefore, AN must be used together with other solvent/ additive that can form protective SEIs to obtain the reversible cycling in lithium-ion full cells.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.2.1 Nitrile
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Therefore, the role of LiF in SEIs and its impact on the ionic transportation remains a controversial topic, with more thorough studies needed”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 4.1 Molecular Additives
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“which is another essential strategy to improve the LT performance of electrolytes by reducing the intrinsic solvating power of solvents.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 4.1 Molecular Additives
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [127] Wang, Z.X., Sun, Z.H., Shi, Y., et al.: Ion-dipole chemistry drives rapid evolution of Li ions solvation sheath in low-temperature Li batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 11, 2100935 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202100935 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Recently, the improved LT electrochemical performance by using phenyl methanesulfonate (PhMs) additive [131] was ascribed to the decreased interphase impedance as well.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 4.1 Molecular Additives
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [131] Lin, Y.C., Yue, X.P., Zhang, H., et al.: Using phenyl methanesulfonate as an electrolyte additive to improve performance of LiNi0.5Co0.2Mn0.3O2/graphite cells at low temperature. Electrochimica Acta 300, 202–207 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2019.01.120 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The high ionic conductivity of DTDderived SEIs observed in this work is in good agreement with the results previously reported in the literature by other groups, in which it was attributed to the reduction products such as Li 2 SO 3 and ROSO 2 Li [111].”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 4.1 Molecular Additives
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [111] Li, X.C., Yin, Z.L., Li, X.H., et al.: Ethylene sulfate as film formation additive to improve the compatibility of graphite electrode for lithium-ion battery. Ionics 20, 795–801 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11581-013-1036-5 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“One critical problem of Li-ion cells operating at LTs is the metallic Li plating, which occurs when cells are charged at LTs, at excessive rates, and/or at high voltage.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 4.2 Ionic Additives
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Experimental and calculation results demonstrated that the Li + -dipole interaction strength gradually decreases from 1.90 to 1.66 eV and then to 1.44 eV with an increase of the fluorination degree from EC to FEC and DFEC, respectively.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 4.1 Molecular Additives
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [127] Wang, Z.X., Sun, Z.H., Shi, Y., et al.: Ion-dipole chemistry drives rapid evolution of Li ions solvation sheath in low-temperature Li batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 11, 2100935 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202100935 source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“the DFEC-based electrolyte displays six times faster ion desolvation rates than that of the EC-based electrolyte at -20 °C.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 4.1 Molecular Additives
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [127] Wang, Z.X., Sun, Z.H., Shi, Y., et al.: Ion-dipole chemistry drives rapid evolution of Li ions solvation sheath in low-temperature Li batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 11, 2100935 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202100935 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The cell using the electrolyte of 1.0 M (0.98 M LiBF 4 + 0.02 M LiBOB) in 1:1:3 PC:EC:EMC was able to deliver 83% and 63% of RT discharge capacity at -30 and -40 °C, respectively (Fig. 16b).”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 4.2 Ionic Additives
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [99] Zhang, S.S., Xu, K., Jow, T.R.: Enhanced performance of Li-ion cell with LiBF4-PC based electrolyte by addition of small amount of LiBOB. J. Power Sources 156, 629–633 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.04.023 source
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This discovery clarified the puzzle on how an ionic insulator like (bulk) LiF can be a critical component for good SEI.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 5.2 Understanding the Nature of SEI Layer
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Hence, LiBOB was introduced into this electrolyte system, which forms an SEI with semicarbonate-like products (Fig. 16a) [99].”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 4.2 Ionic Additives
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [99] Zhang, S.S., Xu, K., Jow, T.R.: Enhanced performance of Li-ion cell with LiBF4-PC based electrolyte by addition of small amount of LiBOB. J. Power Sources 156, 629–633 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.04.023 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The results of the above examples demonstrated that new tools will be able to help us to gain more fundamental understanding of SEIs and provide us valuable insights on the SEI chemistry that have been impossible to study using the traditional characterization techniques.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 5.2 Understanding the Nature of SEI Layer
boostedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The electrolyte using 1,3-PS delivered even lower capacity at LT compared to the electrolyte without additive.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 4.1 Molecular Additives
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [110] Wu, Z.L., Li, S.G., Zheng, Y.Z., et al.: The roles of sulfur-containing additives and their working mechanism on the temperature-dependent performances of Li-ion batteries. J. Electrochem. Soc. 165, A2792–A2800 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0331811jes source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“NMC811-Li cells with the DFECbased electrolyte displayed better fast-charge capability and long-term cyclability in the temperature range from -30 to 25 °C compared to that with the EC-based electrolyte.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 4.1 Molecular Additives
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [127] Wang, Z.X., Sun, Z.H., Shi, Y., et al.: Ion-dipole chemistry drives rapid evolution of Li ions solvation sheath in low-temperature Li batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 11, 2100935 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202100935 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“resulting in the decreased interface resistance (the sum of R sei and R ct ) of graphite anodes at 0 °C [from 1 935 to 820 Ω after adding 0.5% LiDFBOP in the baseline electrolyte (1 M LiPF 6 in PC:EMC, 1:1 in weight ratio)] (Fig. 19b).”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 4.2 Ionic Additives
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [143] Liao, B., Li, H.Y., Xu, M.Q., et al.: Designing low impedance interface films simultaneously on anode and cathode for high energy batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 8, 1800802 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201800802 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The additive-derived surface films prevented the continuous reaction between the electrolyte and electrodes, keeping the structural integrity of NCM cathode and graphite anode.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 4.3 Ionic Liquid Additives
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [144] Wang, W.L., Yang, T.X., Li, S., et al.: 1-Ethyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate (EMI-BF4) as an ionic liquid-type electrolyte additive to enhance the low-temperature performance of LiNi0.5Co0.2Mn0.3O2/graphite batteries. Electrochimica Acta 317, 146–154 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2019.05.027 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The SEI with a thinner organic layer is beneficial for reducing diffusion limitation.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 4.1 Molecular Additives
plaindirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In contrast, adding VC or LiBOB to the baseline electrolyte resulted in worsened Li plating.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 4.2 Ionic Additives
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Besides the protection nature, the SEI and CEI surface films containing more LiF and less Li 2 CO 3 resulted in higher ionic conductivity at both room and LTs based on EIS results.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 4.3 Ionic Liquid Additives
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [144] Wang, W.L., Yang, T.X., Li, S., et al.: 1-Ethyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate (EMI-BF4) as an ionic liquid-type electrolyte additive to enhance the low-temperature performance of LiNi0.5Co0.2Mn0.3O2/graphite batteries. Electrochimica Acta 317, 146–154 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2019.05.027 source
plaindirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“there are competing arguments regarding the effects of inorganic components of SEIs in the literature claiming that improved battery performance was obtained at LTs by decreasing inorganic species including LiF in SEIs.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 4.1 Molecular Additives
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [129] Yang, T.X., Fan, W.Z., Wang, C.Y., et al.: 2,3,4,5,6-Pentafluorophenyl methanesulfonate as a versatile electrolyte additive matches LiNi0.5Co0.2Mn0.3O2/graphite batteries working in a wide-temperature range. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10, 31735–31744 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b04743 source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [130] Guo, R.D., Che, Y.X., Lan, G.Y., et al.: Tailoring low-temperature performance of a lithium-ion battery via rational designing interphase on an anode. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11, 38285–38293 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b12020 source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [131] Lin, Y.C., Yue, X.P., Zhang, H., et al.: Using phenyl methanesulfonate as an electrolyte additive to improve performance of LiNi0.5Co0.2Mn0.3O2/graphite cells at low temperature. Electrochimica Acta 300, 202–207 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2019.01.120 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“This SEI with rich inorganic species has much lower ionic resistance compared to that of baseline electrolyte at 0 °C (Fig. 18a).”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 4.2 Ionic Additives
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [142] Yang, B.W., Zhang, H., Yu, L., et al.: Lithium difluorophosphate as an additive to improve the low temperature performance of LiNi0.5Co0.2Mn0.3O2/graphite cells. Electrochimica Acta 221, 107–114 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2016.10.037 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The capacity retention after 200 cycles was increased from 57% to 94% at 0 °C and C/5 rate after adding LiDFBOP (Fig. 19c).”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 4.2 Ionic Additives
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [143] Liao, B., Li, H.Y., Xu, M.Q., et al.: Designing low impedance interface films simultaneously on anode and cathode for high energy batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 8, 1800802 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201800802 source
plaindirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“High abundance of LiH was confirmed by XRD.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 5.2 Understanding the Nature of SEI Layer
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [163] Shadike, Z., Lee, H., Borodin, O., et al.: Identification of LiH and nanocrystalline LiF in the solid-electrolyte interphase of lithium metal anodes. Nat. Nanotechnol. 16, 549–554 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-020-00845-5 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Therefore, with the increased ionic conductivity on both sides, the charge/discharge performance at LTs was significantly improved by introducing LiDFBOP additive.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 4.2 Ionic Additives
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [143] Liao, B., Li, H.Y., Xu, M.Q., et al.: Designing low impedance interface films simultaneously on anode and cathode for high energy batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 8, 1800802 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201800802 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“It was demonstrated that 1%-5% (molar percentage) LiBOB was sufficient to enable graphite anode cycling reversibly in 1.0 M LiBF 4 in 1:1:3 PC:EC:EMC and 1.0 M LiBF 4 in 1:1 PC:EC, respectively, while maintaining the excellent cycling performance of LiBF 4 -PC-based electrolytes at LTs.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 4.2 Ionic Additives
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [99] Zhang, S.S., Xu, K., Jow, T.R.: Enhanced performance of Li-ion cell with LiBF4-PC based electrolyte by addition of small amount of LiBOB. J. Power Sources 156, 629–633 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.04.023 source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“According to the electron affinity calculation and experimental results, LiDFBOP is electrochemically reduced prior to carbonate solvents 19a.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 4.2 Ionic Additives
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [143] Liao, B., Li, H.Y., Xu, M.Q., et al.: Designing low impedance interface films simultaneously on anode and cathode for high energy batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 8, 1800802 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201800802 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“This improved performance was attributed to the as-formed lower resistance interphase in PFPMS electrolytes compared to VC-additive and no-additive systems, resulting in better ionic conductivity at LTs in full cells.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 4.1 Molecular Additives
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [129] Yang, T.X., Fan, W.Z., Wang, C.Y., et al.: 2,3,4,5,6-Pentafluorophenyl methanesulfonate as a versatile electrolyte additive matches LiNi0.5Co0.2Mn0.3O2/graphite batteries working in a wide-temperature range. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10, 31735–31744 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b04743 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“One problem of using FI as additive is the low initial Coulombic efficiency, caused by the consumption of Li through SEI formation during the first cycle.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 4.1 Molecular Additives
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [128] Shi, J.L., Ehteshami, N., Ma, J.L., et al.: Improving the graphite/electrolyte interface in lithium-ion battery for fast charging and low temperature operation: fluorosulfonyl isocyanate as electrolyte additive. J. Power Sources 429, 67–74 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.04.113 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“It is possible to avoid Li plating by selecting anodes with higher potential than graphite such as metal oxides or alloy anodes [170].”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 5.4 Preventing Lithium Plating on Graphite Surface at LTs
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [170] Lin, X.K., Khosravinia, K., Hu, X.S., et al.: Lithium plating mechanism, detection, and mitigation in lithium-ion batteries. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 87, 100953 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2021.100953 source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- It may state two separate claims as one. 125
- Probably not a substantial claim. 14
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
At least one cited source doesn’t support this claim or points to a different paper, and none confirmed it — see the verdicts below.
In the paper
“The LT effects on charging and discharging are asymmetric: the charge transfer resistance at LTs in the discharged state is substantially higher, making it much more challenging when charging a discharged LIB at LTs [14,15].”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 1 Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [14] Zhang, S.S., Xu, K., Jow, T.R.: The low temperature performance of Li-ion batteries. J. Power Sources 115, 137–140 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7753(02)00618-3 source
- Disputedcites [15] Fan, J., Tan, S.: Studies on charging lithium-ion cells at low temperatures. J. Electrochem. Soc. 153, A1081 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1149/1.2190029 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 2 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“It was concluded that esters with shorter alkyl chains have the advantage in getting better ionic conductivity for the bulk electrolyte, but the disadvantage in forming more resistive and less protective SEIs as compared to longer chain counterparts.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.1.2 Carboxylic Esters
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [39] Smart, M.C., Ratnakumar, B.V., Surampudi, S., et al.: Irreversible capacities of graphite in low-temperature electrolytes for lithium-ion batteries. J. Electrochem. Soc. 146, 3963–3969 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1149/1.1392577 source
- Supportedcites [40] Smart, M.C., Ratnakumar, B.V., Surampudi, S.: Use of organic esters as cosolvents in electrolytes for lithium-ion batteries with improved low temperature performance. J. Electrochem. Soc. 149, A361 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1149/1.1453407 source
Split into 2 atoms — 2 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
- Partly supportedcites [41] Smart, M.C., Ratnakumar, B.V., Chin, K.B., et al.: Lithium-ion electrolytes containing ester cosolvents for improved low temperature performance. J. Electrochem. Soc. 157, A1361 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1149/1.3501236 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Unfortunately, its reduction product is partially soluble in the electrolyte, hence failing to provide a stable SEI and the improvement of LT performance was not realized [37,38].”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.1.2 Carboxylic Esters
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [37] Ein-Eli, Y., Thomas, S.R., Chadha, R., et al.: Li-ion battery electrolyte formulated for low-temperature applications. J. Electrochem. Soc. 144, 823–829 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1149/1.1837495 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results and Discussion (page unavailable) state that Li-formate, methyl formate’s reduction product, is partially soluble and does not fully passivate graphite. But the paper does not conclude that low-temperature performance improvement was not realized: it reports reasonable reversible capacity at −2°C in the tested methyl formate–ethylene carbonate electrolytes, although capacity fell relative to room temperature. (LLM, conf=0.86)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [38] Ein-Eli, Y., Aurbach, D.: The correlation between the cycling efficiency, surface chemistry and morphology of Li electrodes in electrolyte solutions based on methyl formate. J. Power Sources 54, 281–288 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-7753(94)02085-H source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“It is well established that desolvation is dominant when the SEI is less pronounced (i.e., on Li 4 Ti 5 O 12 ) or the interphase is highly conductive [11,13].”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 1 Introduction
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [11] Jow, T.R., Delp, S.A., Allen, J.L., et al.: Factors limiting Li+ charge transfer kinetics in Li-ion batteries. J. Electrochem. Soc. 165, A361–A367 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1149/2.1221802jes source
The Discussion states that no SEI forms on LTO under the studied conditions and that desolvation is rate-limiting at its electrolyte interface. It also treats fast-conducting solid electrolytes as SEI equivalents and says desolvation dominates when their conductivity keeps them from limiting charge transfer. (LLM, conf=0.93)
- Partly supportedcites [13] Li, Q.Y., Lu, D.P., Zheng, J.M., et al.: Li+-desolvation dictating lithium-ion battery’s low-temperature performances. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9, 42761–42768 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b13887 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The analysis on pp. 10–11 describes LTO as nearly interphase-free and finds that desolvation resistance predominates in symmetric cells at −40 °C. It also finds that migration through the SEI is not the limiting step, but does not establish the claim’s specific condition of a highly conductive interphase. The finding is for low-temperature performance, a qualification absent from the citing sentence. (LLM, conf=0.84)
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Figure 5b shows the rapid capacity decay at -20 °C when using electrolytes with MA and EA esters (2 and 3), although higher initial capacity was delivered.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.1.2 Carboxylic Esters
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [40] Smart, M.C., Ratnakumar, B.V., Surampudi, S.: Use of organic esters as cosolvents in electrolytes for lithium-ion batteries with improved low temperature performance. J. Electrochem. Soc. 149, A361 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1149/1.1453407 source
The Prototype Cell Performance section reports that cells with low-molecular-weight ester electrolytes initially performed well at −20 °C but rapidly lost capacity during cycling, unlike all-carbonate cells. The same section identifies MA and EA as the esters tested in prototype cells; the paper also reports that MA- and EA-containing cells sometimes performed better initially than all-carbonate cells. The cited paper does not give page numbers for these passages in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“As shown in Fig. 5a, the MP-based electrolyte showed the best performance and delivered the highest capacity at LT (-40 °C).”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.1.2 Carboxylic Esters
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [40] Smart, M.C., Ratnakumar, B.V., Surampudi, S.: Use of organic esters as cosolvents in electrolytes for lithium-ion batteries with improved low temperature performance. J. Electrochem. Soc. 149, A361 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1149/1.1453407 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Prototype Cell Performance section reports that ester-containing electrolytes outperformed an all-carbonate electrolyte at −40 °C. But the paper’s studied esters are methyl acetate, ethyl acetate, ethyl propionate, and ethyl butyrate—not methyl propionate—and it does not establish that a methyl propionate electrolyte delivered the highest capacity. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Their results suggested that MF has the advantages of low viscosity, low melting point (-99 °C) and relatively high oxidation stability.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.1.2 Carboxylic Esters
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [37] Ein-Eli, Y., Thomas, S.R., Chadha, R., et al.: Li-ion battery electrolyte formulated for low-temperature applications. J. Electrochem. Soc. 144, 823–829 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1149/1.1837495 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction (page not available in our copy) states that methyl formate melts at −99 °C and is highly stable upon oxidation. It describes methyl-formate salt solutions as highly conductive, but does not state that methyl formate has low viscosity; a search for “viscosity” found no supporting passage. (LLM, conf=0.85)
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“It was reported by Ein-Eli et al. [23] that in asymmetric alkyl carbonates a methyl group is required for stable graphite electrode cycling.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.1.1 Carbonates
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [23] Ein-Eli, Y., McDevitt, S.F., Laura, R.: The superiority of asymmetric alkyl methyl carbonates. J. Electrochem. Soc. 145, L1–L3 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1149/1.1838196 source
The Introduction explicitly states that a methyl group is required for high stability of graphite electrodes during cycling in asymmetric alkyl carbonates. The Results and Discussion also report good cycling in the tested methyl alkyl carbonates and poor performance in those without a methoxy group. (LLM, conf=0.95)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“It was shown by Ein-Eli et al. [28] that the electrolyte using methyl propyl carbonate (MPC) has even more superior SEI formation capability than EMC as a single solvent with both LiPF 6 and LiAsF 6 salts, but no LT performance improvement was reported.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.1.1 Carbonates
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [28] Ein-Eli, Y., McDevitt, S.F., Aurbach, D., et al.: Methyl propyl carbonate: a promising single solvent for Li-ion battery electrolytes. J. Electrochem. Soc. 144, L180–L184 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1149/1.1837792 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“However, the capacity of LIB drops dramatically at low temperatures (LTs) below 0 °C, thus restricting its applications as a reliable power source for electric vehicles in cold climates and equipment used in the aerospace.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [3] Zhang, S.S., Xu, K., Jow, T.R.: Low temperature performance of graphite electrode in Li-ion cells. Electrochim. Acta 48, 241–246 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-4686(02)00620-5 source
- Partly supportedcites [4] Nagasubramanian, G.: Electrical characteristics of 18 650 Li-ion cells at low temperatures. J. Appl. Electrochem. 31, 99–104 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004113825283 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results (section 3.1, p. 7) report declining delivered energy and power as temperature falls, and the paper states that performance below 0 °C is poor. The Introduction (p. 4) links subambient performance to successful use in space and aerospace applications. The paper measures energy and power rather than directly establishing a drop in capacity, and the cited passages do not address electric vehicles in cold climates. (LLM, conf=0.87)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [5] Zhu, G.L., Wen, K.C., Lv, W.Q., et al.: Materials insights into low-temperature performances of lithium-ion batteries. J. Power Sources 300, 29–40 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.09.056 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Combining with FEC additive, MP-based electrolyte formed LiF-rich interphase layer on cathodes and anodes, which prevents the formation of thick CEI/SEI layers as well as metallic Li deposition on graphite anode.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.1.2 Carboxylic Esters
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [44] Cho, Y.G., Li, M.Q., Holoubek, J., et al.: Enabling the low-temperature cycling of NMC||graphite pouch cells with an ester-based electrolyte. ACS Energy Lett. 6, 2016–2023 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.1c00484 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Usage of the stronger (compared to semifluorinated short alkanes) Li + coordinating nitriles such as acetonitrile, linear and cyclic ether cosolvents improved salt dissociation and solubility resulting in a substantial increase at LT.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.2.5 Liquified Gas Electrolytes (LGEs)
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [75] Yang, Y., Davies, D.M., Yin, Y.J., et al.: High-efficiency lithium-metal anode enabled by liquefied gas electrolytes. Joule 3, 1986–2000 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2019.06.008 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The retrieved copy provides a table of contents, including “Physical-Chemical Properties of Liquefied Gas Electrolytes” and “Low-Temperature Performance,” but no substantive passage from either section. Searches for acetonitrile, cosolvents, semifluorinated alkanes, and salt dissociation or solubility yielded no passage that addresses the claimed low-temperature increase. (LLM, conf=0.72)
- Partly supportedcites [76] Yang, Y., Yin, Y.J., Davies, D.M., et al.: Liquefied gas electrolytes for wide-temperature lithium metal batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 13, 2209–2219 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ee01446j sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Section 2.1 (page unavailable) reports that acetonitrile coordinates more strongly with Li⁺ than fluoromethane, that the salt dissolves in the acetonitrile-containing mixture, and that the electrolyte has high low-temperature conductivity. It does not report using linear or cyclic ether cosolvents or establish improved salt dissociation as the cause of that conductivity. (LLM, conf=0.87)
- Partly supportedcites [77] Davies, D.M., Yang, Y., Sablina, E.S., et al.: A safer, wide-temperature liquefied gas electrolyte based on difluoromethane. J. Power Sources 493, 229668 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.229668 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Section 1.2 (p. 4) reports that increasing the co-solvent-to-salt ratio allowed lithium salts to dissolve in difluoromethane; Section 1.3 (p. 6) finds that the ether co-solvent DME coordinates strongly to Li+. The paper does not establish the claimed effect for acetonitrile or cyclic ethers, nor does it attribute a substantial low-temperature increase to improved salt dissociation and solubility. (LLM, conf=0.85)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Could not verify
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Importantly, during nail penetration test performed on cells with LGEs, the non-toxic solvent rapidly evaporated and immediately escaped after penetration.The cells cooled down and the electrolyte conductivity dropped as a result of the solvent evaporation which shut down the ion transport and thermal runaway reactions [77].”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.2.5 Liquified Gas Electrolytes (LGEs)
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [77] Davies, D.M., Yang, Y., Sablina, E.S., et al.: A safer, wide-temperature liquefied gas electrolyte based on difluoromethane. J. Power Sources 493, 229668 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.229668 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Section 1.1 (p. 3) reports that the solvent rapidly escaped after nail penetration, cooling the cell and eliminating the ionic conductive pathway, so Li-ions could no longer move between electrodes. It reports no sparks or flames and says short-circuiting was prevented, but does not show that thermal-runaway reactions began and were then shut down. (LLM, conf=0.84)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Lucht et al. [101] designed a novel electrolyte, 1 M LiDFOB GBL:MB (1:1) [LiDFOB: lithium difluoro(oxalato)borate], with higher ionic conductivity at -10 °C but delivering relatively lower discharge capacity than the LiPF 6 -based electrolyte (Fig. 12c), which can be attributed to the larger SEI resistance resulted from LiDFOB decomposition (Fig. 12d).”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 3 Salts
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [101] Lazar, M.L., Lucht, B.L.: Carbonate free electrolyte for lithium ion batteries containing γ-butyrolactone and methyl butyrate. J. Electrochem. Soc. 162, A928–A934 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0601506jes source
The Experimental section identifies the 1 M LiDFOB in 1:1 GBL/MB formulation. Results and Discussion reports better conductivity at low temperatures but lower discharge capacity at −10 °C than the standard LiPF6 electrolyte. The Conclusions attribute the low-temperature capacity decrease likely to increased impedance from changes in the SEI, and the surface analysis identifies LiDFOB decomposition products as dominating that SEI. The causal explanation is therefore supported as a qualified interpretation, not a demonstrated sole cause. (LLM, conf=0.87)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Hilbig et al. [53] showed similar results, suggesting that AN is helpful for improving lithium-ion transport properties at LT (0 °C) but needs FEC as the additive to enable the reversible cycling for the graphite-anode-based full cells.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.2.1 Nitrile
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [53] Hilbig, P., Ibing, L., Streipert, B., et al.: Acetonitrile-based electrolytes for lithium-ion battery application. Curr. Top. Electrochem. 20, 1 (2018). https://doi.org/10.31300/CTEC.20.2018.1-13 source
The Conductivity measurements section reports higher conductivity for AN:FEC electrolytes than for the standard carbonate electrolyte, especially around 0 °C. The Abstract says FEC enables AN compatibility with graphite anodes, and the reported graphite/LFP full-cell measurements show cycling with an AN:FEC electrolyte. (LLM, conf=0.91)
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Excellent conductivity (> 4 mS cm -1 ) was reported from -78 to 75 °C with an unexpectedly high lithium transference number (t + ) of 0.72 [76].”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.2.5 Liquified Gas Electrolytes (LGEs)
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [76] Yang, Y., Yin, Y.J., Davies, D.M., et al.: Liquefied gas electrolytes for wide-temperature lithium metal batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 13, 2209–2219 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ee01446j source
The Abstract reports conductivity above 4 mS cm⁻¹ from −78 to +75 °C and a lithium transference number of 0.72. Section 2.1 gives conductivity values of 4.8 mS cm⁻¹ at −78 °C and 5.7 mS cm⁻¹ at +75 °C, and the discussion reports the experimentally measured transference number. (LLM, conf=0.95)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“The low binding energy of Li + (DEE) 1.8 provided a much favorable desolvation energy barrier to be overcome and resulted in excellent CE (98.4%) of Li/Cu cells at ultra-LTs (-60 °C), as shown in Fig. 8b.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.2.2 Ethers
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [57] Holoubek, J., Liu, H.D., Wu, Z.H., et al.: Tailoring electrolyte solvation for Li metal batteries cycled at ultra-low temperature. Nat. Energy (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-021-00783-z source
The Electrolyte Solvation Structure and Performance Impact section reports a lower binding-energy magnitude for Li⁺(DEE)₁.₈ than for the DME complex and treats the difference as a qualitative indication of their desolvation barriers. The Ultra-Low Temperature Li Metal Performance section reports 98.4% Coulombic efficiency for Li||Cu cells using the DEE electrolyte at −60 °C. (LLM, conf=0.91)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Although liquified gas solvents have a moderate dielectric constant (10-15), their super low viscosity and superior dielectric-fluidity factor make them highly promising for LT applications [74].”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.2.5 Liquified Gas Electrolytes (LGEs)
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [74] Rustomji, C.S., Yang, Y., Kim, T., et al.: Liquefied gas electrolytes for electrochemical energy storage devices. Meet. Abstr. 5, 1089 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1149/ma2016-03/2/1089 source
The Physical and chemical properties section gives dielectric constants of 10–15, says the solvents have exceptionally low viscosity, and reports a superior dielectric-fluidity factor. The Rationale links these properties and the solvents’ low melting points to potential improvements in low-temperature operation. Page numbers were not provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.94)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Although fluorination can lead to higher viscosity (for example, at RT, the viscosity of EMC and fluoroethyl methyl carbonate are 0.68 and 1.4 cP, respectively [63]), the ionic conductivity is not always compromised since some fluorination may lead to higher dielectric constant.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.2.3 Fluorinated Solvents
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [63] Takehara, M., Tsukimori, N., Nanbu, N., et al.: Physical and electrolytic properties of fluoroethyl methyl carbonate. Electrochem. 71, 1201–1204 (2003). https://doi.org/10.5796/electrochemistry.71.1201 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The paper's Introduction states that FEMC has much higher viscosity than EMC, supporting the comparison used to illustrate fluorination's effect. The passages in our copy do not give the cited room-temperature values of 0.68 and 1.4 cP, so those figures cannot be verified. (LLM, conf=0.82)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“FEC is a widely used and extensively studied additive in LIB and LMA systems, as it can participate in SEI formation due to its higher reduction potential compared to nonfluorinated carbonates, enhancing its capability in forming a LiF-rich SEI to protect graphite and LMA, which in turn improves the cycling stability and capacity retention at RT [123,124].”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 4.1 Molecular Additives
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [123] Michan, A.L., Parimalam, B.S., Leskes, M., et al.: Fluoroethylene carbonate and vinylene carbonate reduction: understanding lithium-ion battery electrolyte additives and solid electrolyte interphase formation. Chem. Mater. 28, 8149–8159 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b02282 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [124] Zhang, X.Q., Cheng, X.B., Chen, X., et al.: Fluoroethylene carbonate additives to render uniform Li deposits in lithium metal batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 27, 1605989 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201605989 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Typically, surface coating with amorphous silicon nanolayer or doping with nanometal particles can improve initial Coulombic efficiency and Li + diffusion kinetics [168,169].”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 5.3 Electrode Engineering
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [168] Kim, N., Chae, S., Ma, J., et al.: Fast-charging high-energy lithium-ion batteries via implantation of amorphous silicon nanolayer in edge-plane activated graphite anodes. Nat. Commun. 8, 1–10 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-00973-y sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction and Results (pages not provided) say the amorphous Si nanolayer enables fast Li-ion diffusion, and the composite has high initial Coulombic efficiency. They attribute that efficiency chiefly to activated graphite edge sites and minimized surface area, however, not to the Si coating; they describe the remaining Ni nanoparticles as improving electrical conductivity, not as metal-particle doping that improves both claimed properties. (LLM, conf=0.86)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [169] Yan, Y., Ben, L.B., Zhan, Y.J., et al.: Nano-Sn embedded in expanded graphite as anode for lithium ion batteries with improved LT electrochemical performance. Electrochim. Acta 187, 186–192 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2015.11.015 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Strangely, the signature of Li fluoride (LiF) lattice was not detected, even though LiF is considered to be a primary reason for performance enhancement [162].”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 5.2 Understanding the Nature of SEI Layer
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [162] Wang, C.S., Meng, Y.S., Xu, K.: Perspective: fluorinating interphases. J. Electrochem. Soc. 166, A5184–A5186 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0281903jes sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Current Status section associates fluorine-rich interphases, including those containing LiF, with beneficial passivation. But it identifies LiF or C–F species together and does not establish LiF as the primary reason for performance enhancement; the Conclusions also stress that how fluorine is distributed matters more than its amount. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“The inner layer appears to be an amorphous polymer matrix, whereas the outer layer is determined to be large grains (~ 15 nm) of Li oxide with clear lattice fringes.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 5.2 Understanding the Nature of SEI Layer
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [165] Li, Y.Z., Li, Y.B., Pei, A., et al.: Atomic structure of sensitive battery materials and interfaces revealed by cryo-electron microscopy. Science 358, 506–510 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam6014 source
The passage describing the FEC-containing electrolyte and Fig. 4H states that its SEI has an inner amorphous polymer matrix and an outer layer of approximately 15 nm Li oxide grains with clear lattice fringes. This directly matches the citing sentence. (LLM, conf=0.95)
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“In addition to 1,3-PS and DTD, DMS and methylene methanedisulfonate (MMDS) have also been studied, showing capability for low-impedance SEI formation [113-115].”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 4.1 Molecular Additives
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [113] Zuo, X.X., Fan, C.J., Xiao, X., et al.: High-voltage performance of LiCoO2/graphite batteries with methylene methanedisulfonate as electrolyte additive. J. Power Sources 219, 94–99 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.07.026 source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [114] Xia, J., Sinha, N.N., Chen, L.P., et al.: A comparative study of a family of sulfate electrolyte additives. J. Electrochem. Soc. 161, A264–A274 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1149/2.015403jes source
- Partly supportedcites [115] Xia, J., Harlow, J.E., Petibon, R., et al.: Comparative study on methylene methyl disulfonate (MMDS) and 1,3-propane sultone (PS) as electrolyte additives for Li-ion batteries. J. Electrochem. Soc. 161, A547–A553 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1149/2.049404jes sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results and Discussion (page unavailable) report that MMDS, alone or in combination, significantly decreased cell impedance after storage and cycling. The paper also describes MMDS as a film-forming additive, but the cited passages do not establish that the measured low impedance specifically belongs to the SEI. The paper studies MMDS, not DMS, so it does not support that part of the sentence. (LLM, conf=0.86)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“For the graphite||LiCoO 2 cell using 1 M LiPF 6 /EC:EMC baseline electrolytes with 0.2 M LiFSI additive, the SEI impedance was significantly decreased and Li plating was suppressed compared with the baseline electrolyte.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 4.2 Ionic Additives
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [139] Pham, H.Q., Chung, G.J., Han, J., et al.: Interface stabilization via lithium bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide additive as a key for promoted performance of graphite‖LiCoO2 pouch cell under − 20 °C. J. Chem. Phys. 152, 094709 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5144280 source
The Experimental Section identifies the cell electrolyte as 1 M LiPF₆/EC:EMC with 0.2 M LiFSI added. The impedance discussion reports a smaller SEI-related semicircle with LiFSI than with the base electrolyte, and the Surface Chemistry section describes the LiFSI cell as free of lithium-metal plating under the tested −20 °C conditions. (LLM, conf=0.93)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
In the paper
“By using fluobenzene (FB) as non-solvating cosolvent, the affinity between PC and Li + was lowered efficiently and the desolvation of electrolyte at graphite surface was also facilitated.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.1.1 Carbonates
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [36] Qin, M.S., Liu, M.C., Zeng, Z.Q., et al.: Rejuvenating propylene carbonate-based electrolyte through nonsolvating interactions for wide-temperature Li-ions batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 12, 2201801 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202201801 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“By coupling with the electrochemically activated SEI on a lithium metal anode (LMA), a Li/LiCoO 2 cell displayed high-rate charge capability and superior long-term cyclability at -15 °C.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.1.1 Carbonates
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [32] Gao, Y., Rojas, T., Wang, K., et al.: Low-temperature and high-rate-charging lithium metal batteries enabled by an electrochemically active monolayer-regulated interface. Nat. Energy 5, 534–542 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-020-0640-7 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, excessively large size could compromise the mobility of anions and the overall transport property of the electrolyte.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 1 Introduction
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Generally, the more polar the solvent molecules are, the less likely the counterions would tend to recombine”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 1 Introduction
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The binary additive systems showed better performance than single FEC or EC additive only by forming thinner and conductive SEI layers, especially under an LT of -10 °C.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.1.1 Carbonates
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [33] Wotango, A., Su, W.N., Haregewoin, A.M., et al.: Designed synergetic effect of electrolyte additives to improve interfacial chemistry of MCMB electrode in propylene carbonate-based electrolyte for enhanced low and room temperature performance. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10, 25252–25262 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b02185 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Carboxylic esters generally have the advantages of low viscosity and low melting point, favoring lithium-ion transport in the electrolyte.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.1.2 Carboxylic Esters
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“At subzero temperatures, LIBs experience severe energy and capacity loss, as well as charging related safety hazards.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 1 Introduction
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“To keep anions and cations effectively apart, as well as to facilitate the Li + transport at LT applications, solvents need to have high dielectric constants and donor numbers, low viscosity, and low melting points.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 1 Introduction
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The EC/linear carbonate mixture electrolyte simultaneously provides sufficient anode protection and rapid ion transportation inside bulk electrolyte at RT.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 1 Introduction
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“This kinetically limited process with an energy barrier of 50-70 kJ mol -1 [10] greatly limits fast charging and LT electrochemical performance.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 1 Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [10] Xu, K., von Cresce, A., Lee, U.: Differentiating contributions to “ion transfer” barrier from interphasial resistance and Li+ desolvation at electrolyte/graphite interface. Langmuir 26, 11538–11543 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1021/la1009994 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Coupling with film-forming additive FEC, the PC-based electrolyte enables reversible Li intercalation/ extraction to/from the graphite anode without destroying its structure and the graphite/NMC532 full cell also exhibited excellent wide-temperature performance.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.1.1 Carbonates
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [35] Liu, X.W., Shen, X.H., Li, H., et al.: Ethylene carbonate-free propylene carbonate-based electrolytes with excellent electrochemical compatibility for Li-ion batteries through engineering electrolyte solvation structure. Adv. Energy Mater. 11, 2003905 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202003905 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“As a result, the graphite electrode retains 80% of its initial capacity after 500 cycles and the graphite/ NMC811 full cell demonstrated improved electrochemical performance in a wide-temperature range from -40 to 60 °C.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.1.1 Carbonates
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [36] Qin, M.S., Liu, M.C., Zeng, Z.Q., et al.: Rejuvenating propylene carbonate-based electrolyte through nonsolvating interactions for wide-temperature Li-ions batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 12, 2201801 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202201801 source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“When a LIB operates at subzero environments, the decreased temperature severely slows down both the ion transport in the bulk electrolyte and in particular the charge transfer across the interphase.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 1 Introduction
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In addition, adding the linear carbonate can also increase the stability of PC and the stability also increases with the content of the linear carbonate, which is attributed to the lower content of free PC solvent [34].”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.1.1 Carbonates
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [34] Yamada, Y., Koyama, Y., Abe, T., et al.: Correlation between charge-discharge behavior of graphite and solvation structure of the lithium ion in propylene carbonate-containing electrolytes. J. Phys. Chem. C 113, 8948–8953 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1021/jp9022458 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The electrolyte solvents are key components in determining the bulk electrolyte ionic conductivity and are major contributors to interphasial chemistry.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2 Solvents
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Because it is the Li + rather than the anion that is usually strongly solvated, the resulting Li + solvation shell is much bulkier and moves more slowly than the loosely solvated anions, resulting in a low t Li + (~ 0.4) in most non-aqueous elec- trolytes at typical salt concentrations around 1 M”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 1 Introduction
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For good ion transport properties, linear carbonates with shorter alkyl chains are generally favored as they have lower viscosity than those with longer alkyl chains.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.1.1 Carbonates
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“EMC has a wide liquid temperature range from -53 to 110 °C with a very small dipole moment, which enhances the kinetics and reduces the charge transfer resistance for the desolvation process.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.1.1 Carbonates
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [29] Nan, B., Chen, L., Rodrigo, N.D., et al.: Enhancing Li+ transport in NMC811||graphite lithium-ion batteries at low temperatures by using low-polarity-solvent electrolytes. Angewandte Chemie Int. 61, e202205967 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202205967 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although using esters as solvent can greatly improve the discharge capacity at LTs due to their desirable melting points and viscosity, a poor SEI formed in such electrolytes was not able to sustain stable long-term cycling under cold conditions.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.1.2 Carboxylic Esters
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Although the low melting point and viscosity of ETFA can reduce Li + migration barriers at LTs, the weak affinity between ETFA-Li + can cause low Li + conductivity of the electrolyte.Therefore, FEC was introduced to enhance the solubility of salt and the stability of SEI [46].”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.1.2 Carboxylic Esters
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [46] Yang, Y., Fang, Z., Yin, Y., et al.: Synergy of weakly-solvated electrolyte and optimized interphase enables graphite anode charge at low temperature. Angewandte Chemie Int. Ed. 61, e202208345 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202208345 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Linear carbonates are generally much less viscous compared with their cyclic counterparts.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.1.1 Carbonates
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In addition to the protection effectiveness, the desired SEI should also have good ionic transport property as well, which can result in the overall low impedance [17].”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2 Solvents
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [17] Lin, W., Zhu, M.Y., Fan, Y., et al.: Low temperature lithium-ion batteries electrolytes: rational design, advancements, and future perspectives. J. Alloys Compd. 905, 164163 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.164163 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“As a result, the graphite-NMC811 pouch cell showed enhanced cyclic stability operating across a wide-temperature range from -40 to 50 °C.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.1.1 Carbonates
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [29] Nan, B., Chen, L., Rodrigo, N.D., et al.: Enhancing Li+ transport in NMC811||graphite lithium-ion batteries at low temperatures by using low-polarity-solvent electrolytes. Angewandte Chemie Int. 61, e202205967 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202205967 source
plaindirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The quote only partly states this claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition, some solvents listed in Fig. 3 are not suitable for Li-ion batteries, such as diethyl ether (DEE), 1,3-dioxolane (DOL), tetrahydrofuran (THF), 1,2-dimethoxyethane (DME), and 1,4-dioxane (DX).They can be used for low voltage systems, but not in LIBs with high operating voltage.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.1 Carbonates and Carboxylic Esters
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“PC solvent possesses a wide liquid temperature range (from -49 to 240 °C), high-voltage stability, and good solvation behavior.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.1.1 Carbonates
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A well-developed stable SEI on graphitic anode, e.g., formed by ethylene carbonate (EC) reduction, can facilitate Li + transportation, insulate electron transfer and prevent further electrolyte reductions at the electrolyte/electrode interface at the low potentials.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 1 Introduction
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For LT operation of LIBs, high Li + conductivity, stable anode and cathode electrode interphase and lower charge transfer resistance are important factors, among which the reduced charge transfer resistance dominates LT performance which is hard to realize.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.1.1 Carbonates
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The electrolyte type dictates the interphase chemistry on electrodes that operate beyond the electrochemical stability limits.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 1 Introduction
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These results suggested that co-intercalation of PC-based electrolyte is not only caused by instable SEI but also greatly associated with strong electrostatic interactions of PC-Li + .”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.1.1 Carbonates
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The electrochemical window of LHCE containing LiBF 4 in FEC/MA/TFME solvents is up to 5.4 V, and its ionic conductivity is measured to be 0.803-3.330mS cm -1 in the temperature range from -50 to 25 °C.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.1.2 Carboxylic Esters
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [45] Feng, T.T., Yang, G.Z., Zhang, S., et al.: Low-temperature and high-voltage lithium-ion battery enabled by localized high-concentration carboxylate electrolytes. Chem. Eng. J. 433, 134138 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.134138 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A novel cosolvent of 2,2,2-trifluoroethyl N-caproate (TFENH) could help to lower the viscosity and improve the ionic conductivity of electrolytes, due to the priority distribution of TFENH in bulk electrolytes, which results in improved cycling stability and capacity retention of LiCoO 2 /graphite cell at -35 °C compared to that with commercial carbonate-based electrolytes [69].”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.2.3 Fluorinated Solvents
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [69] Guo, R., Han, W.: The effects of electrolytes, electrolyte/electrode interphase, and binders on lithium-ion batteries at low temperature. Mater. Today Sustain. 19, 100187 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtsust.2022.100187 source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This excellent LT performance was due to not only the exceptionally good ionic conductivity of the liquified gas, but also the excellent interphase formed in the FM electrolyte.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.2.5 Liquified Gas Electrolytes (LGEs)
plaindirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Both experimental and theoretical results demonstrated that there is a distinct ion-pairing transition when the local concentration exceeds 4 M (3:1 BTFE/DME ratio), which resulted in stable cycling of LMA and NMC811 cathodes even at LTs.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.2.2 Ethers
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [58] Holoubek, J., Kim, K., Yin, Y.J., et al.: Electrolyte design implications of ion-pairing in low-temperature Li metal batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 15, 1647–1658 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1039/D1EE03422G source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“It can be clearly seen that the interphase impedance, especially the charge transfer resistance of the LiBF 4 -based electrolyte, is lower than that of the LiPF 6 -based electrolyte, showing the origin of the capacity difference.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 3 Salts
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [95] Zhang, S.S., Xu, K., Jow, T.R.: A new approach toward improved low temperature performance of Li-ion battery. Electrochem. Commun. 4, 928–932 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1388-2481(02)00490-3 source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Zhang et al. [95] found that although a LiBF 4 -based electrolyte has an overall lower ionic conductivity than the electrolyte using LiPF 6 , it delivered higher capacity at -30 °C than the LiPF 6 -based electrolyte, as shown in Fig. 12a.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 3 Salts
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [95] Zhang, S.S., Xu, K., Jow, T.R.: A new approach toward improved low temperature performance of Li-ion battery. Electrochem. Commun. 4, 928–932 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1388-2481(02)00490-3 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Among various electrolytes, the water-based electrolyte using LiCl salt for the LCO cathode cell retained nearly 72% of its RT capacity at -40 °C, which is much higher than that of traditional organic electrolytes.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.2.6 Aqueous Electrolytes
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [80] Ramanujapuram, A., Yushin, G.: Understanding the exceptional performance of lithium-ion battery cathodes in aqueous electrolytes at subzero temperatures. Adv. Energy Mater. 8, 1802624 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201802624 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In rationally designed LGEs, solvated FSI -and dimethyl ether (Me 2 O) dominate the solvation structure, which is believed to reduce the free Me 2 O solvent amount leading to the improvement of the oxidative stability and the salt decomposition to form a LiF-rich SEI on the anode.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.2.5 Liquified Gas Electrolytes (LGEs)
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [78] Yin, Y.J., Yang, Y., Cheng, D.Y., et al.: Fire-extinguishing, recyclable liquefied gas electrolytes for temperature-resilient lithium-metal batteries. Nat. Energy 7, 548–559 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-022-01051-4 source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Such low-impedance interphase is highly desirable for LT electrolytes, since more deliverable capacity of the whole cell can be obtained.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.2.3 Fluorinated Solvents
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Fluorination generally leads to a lower melting point [59], higher oxidation stability [60], better safety characteristics [61], and superior SEI formation capability [62].”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.2.3 Fluorinated Solvents
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [59] Jow, T.R., Xu, K., Borodin, O., et al. (eds.): Electrolytes for Lithium and Lithium-Ion Batteries. Springer, Heidelberg (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0302-3 source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [60] Xu, K.: Electrolytes and interphases in Li-ion batteries and beyond. Chem. Rev. 114, 11503–11618 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1021/cr500003w source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [62] Fan, X.L., Ji, X., Chen, L., et al.: All-temperature batteries enabled by fluorinated electrolytes with non-polar solvents. Nat. Energy 4, 882–890 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-019-0474-3 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, its sensitivity to moisture results in HF formation, which induces transition metal dissolution of NMCs, resulting in cell degradation.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 3 Salts
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Suo et al. [79] firstly developed WiSEs to broaden the voltage window of electrolytes to 3 V, where a high concentration (21 M) of LiTFSI salt was dissolved in water and an anion-derived SEI was formed to inhibit the decomposition of water.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.2.6 Aqueous Electrolytes
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [79] Suo, L.M., Borodin, O., Gao, T., et al.: “Water-in-salt” electrolyte enables high-voltage aqueous lithium-ion chemistries. Science 350, 938–943 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aab1595 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Recently, Kasprzyk et al. [73] prepared a new type of non-crystallizing solvent by mixing EC with poly(ethylene glycol) dimethyl ether (PEG250).Because of the special interactions between planar EC and PEG250 chain, this mixture exhibited a super low glass transition temperature in the range from -93 to -95 °C, and an ionic conductivity of 0.014 mS cm -1 at -60 °C.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.2.4 Gel Polymer Electrolytes
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [73] Kasprzyk, M., Zalewska, A., Niedzicki, L., et al.: Non-crystallizing solvent mixtures and lithium electrolytes for low temperatures. Solid State Ion. 308, 22–26 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssi.2017.05.014 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“At LTs, the remaining liquid phase predominantly consists of the Li + -DOL solvation complex, whose weak binding energy benefits the Li + desolvation process at the electrode, as evidenced by the low activation energy barrier and the high exchange current density for Li + de/intercalation to electrodes.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.2.6 Aqueous Electrolytes
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [85] Ma, Z.K., Chen, J.W., Vatamanu, J., et al.: Expanding the low-temperature and high-voltage limits of aqueous lithium-ion battery. Energy Storage Mater. 45, 903–910 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2021.12.045 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Tao's group [81] designed an ultralow freezing point electrolyte using DMSO as additive with 0.3 molar fraction, enabling a capacity retention as high as 60% of its RT capacity at -50 °C.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.2.6 Aqueous Electrolytes
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [81] Nian, Q.S., Wang, J.Y., Liu, S., et al.: Aqueous batteries operated at − 50 °C. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58, 16994–16999 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201908913 source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Xu's group [84] increased the salt concentration of LiTFSI to 15.3 M in AN-WiSE, where the presence of interfacial water at the negatively charged electrode surface has been minimized, resulting in uniform and thin interphase consisting of an organic outer layer based on nitrile and sulfamide species and an inner layer rich in LiF.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.2.6 Aqueous Electrolytes
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [84] Chen, J.W., Vatamanu, J., Xing, L.D., et al.: Improving electrochemical stability and low-temperature performance with water/acetonitrile hybrid electrolytes. Adv. Energy Mater. 10, 1902654 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201902654 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, a narrow electrochemical stability window of 1.23 V and poor LT performance including low power density and severe capacity degradation are also critical issues to be addressed.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.2.6 Aqueous Electrolytes
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“However, the disadvantage of a tightly bound ether solvation cage could be partially overcome by increasing the salt concentration, in which the Li + approaches a solvated electrolyte state, as suggested by Watanabe et al. [55], and the desolvation energy becomes minimized by the closely solvation cages or contact-ionpairs (CIPs).”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.2.2 Ethers
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [55] Ueno, K., Murai, J., Ikeda, K., et al.: Li+ solvation and ionic transport in lithium solvate ionic liquids diluted by molecular solvents. J. Phys. Chem. C 120, 15792–15802 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b11642 source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addressing this problem, fluorination improves the oxidation stability of ethers and shows better compatibility with cathodes while keeping the advantage of low viscosity of ethers.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.2.3 Fluorinated Solvents
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Recently, Wang's group used TTE as a cosolvent in an LT electrolyte (i.e., the salt is LiFSI and other cosolvents are FEMC and FEC) and obtained impressive LT electrochemical performance [62].”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.2.3 Fluorinated Solvents
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [62] Fan, X.L., Ji, X., Chen, L., et al.: All-temperature batteries enabled by fluorinated electrolytes with non-polar solvents. Nat. Energy 4, 882–890 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-019-0474-3 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Therefore, Wang's group [87] developed localized water-in-salt electrolytes (LWiSEs) with low-cost and high safety for aqueous lithium-ion batteries, in which they used inexpensive and eco-friendly LiNO 3 salt to replace the toxic and costly Li salts, and lowered the electrolyte salt concentration by introducing diluents that dissolve the water but not the inorganic salts.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.2.6 Aqueous Electrolytes
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [87] Jaumaux, P., Yang, X., Zhang, B., et al.: Localized water-in-salt electrolyte for aqueous lithium-ion batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60, 19965–19973 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202107389 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Furthermore, although MTFP slightly increased the viscosity, after RT charging, the Li||NMC811 cell using MTFP electrolytes delivered comparable capacity retention (~ 80%) as MP electrolytes did at -40 °C, which is much higher than that using EC-DEC as solvent (~10 %) (Fig. 9d).”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.2.3 Fluorinated Solvents
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [68] Holoubek, J., Yu, M.Y., Yu, S.C., et al.: An all-fluorinated ester electrolyte for stable high-voltage Li metal batteries capable of ultra-low-temperature operation. ACS Energy Lett. 5, 1438–1447 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.0c00643 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Ethers have been considered as promising solvents for LT electrolytes due to the low viscosity and low melting points (Fig. 3).”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.2.2 Ethers
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Cycling Li||NMC811 cell between 2.0 and 4.5 V, the electrolyte using methyl 3,3,3-trifluoropropionate (MTFP)/FEC as the solvent retained 150 mAh g -1 capacity after cycling at RT for over 250 cycles, while the cell using non-fluorinated counterpart only retained 110 mAh g -1 , as shown in Fig. 9c.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.2.3 Fluorinated Solvents
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [68] Holoubek, J., Yu, M.Y., Yu, S.C., et al.: An all-fluorinated ester electrolyte for stable high-voltage Li metal batteries capable of ultra-low-temperature operation. ACS Energy Lett. 5, 1438–1447 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.0c00643 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Nitrile, especially acetonitrile (AN), has many excellent properties such as low viscosity, a low melting point and a high dielectric constant, making it a very good solvent for enhancing electrolyte ionic conductivity.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.2.1 Nitrile
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition to the formation of better SEIs, fluorination can also lower the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) that often correlates with the increased oxidation stability of the electrolyte.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.2.3 Fluorinated Solvents
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It should be noted that caution should be taken in comparing the performance since the results from different chemistry and cell designs are not comparable.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.1.2 Carboxylic Esters
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The water/DOL hybrid electrolyte displays a stable electrochemical window of 4.7 V, which is attributed to the reduced content of the free water molecules at the anode surface, leading to robust LiF-rich SEI formation that substantially suppresses hydrogen evolution.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.2.6 Aqueous Electrolytes
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [85] Ma, Z.K., Chen, J.W., Vatamanu, J., et al.: Expanding the low-temperature and high-voltage limits of aqueous lithium-ion battery. Energy Storage Mater. 45, 903–910 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2021.12.045 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition, the potential toxicity of nitrile and nitrile decomposition products also needs to be considered.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.2.1 Nitrile
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“As a result, the graphite/NCA pouch cell demonstrated extended cycle life at -15 °C with a 0.3 C charge rate and a high capacity retention of 76% of its RT capacity at -50 °C.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.1.2 Carboxylic Esters
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [47] Yao, Y.X., Yao, N., Zhou, X.R., et al.: Ethylene-carbonate-free electrolytes for rechargeable Li-ion pouch cells at sub-freezing temperatures. Adv. Mater. 34, 2206448 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202206448 source
boosteddirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“More importantly, the stable electrochemical window has been expended to 4.5 V, enabling a LiMn 2 O 4 / Li 4 Ti 5 O 12 full cell with excellent cycling stability and rate capability at both ambient and sub-ambient temperatures.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.2.6 Aqueous Electrolytes
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [84] Chen, J.W., Vatamanu, J., Xing, L.D., et al.: Improving electrochemical stability and low-temperature performance with water/acetonitrile hybrid electrolytes. Adv. Energy Mater. 10, 1902654 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201902654 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Despite low dielectric constant, glymes strongly bind to Li + resulting in the solvent co-intercalation into graphite electrodes.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.2.2 Ethers
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Introducing additives is a very effective and cost-efficient approach to modifing certain properties of electrolytes.Since only a small amount of additive is used, the negative impact to the electrolyte bulk properties such as viscosity and dielectric constant is minimized.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 3 Salts
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“As a result, the LMO/LTO full cell demonstrated a high operating voltage of 2.7 V and excellent electrochemical performance with an ultrahigh specific capacity retention ratio up to 98% from 0 to -20 °C.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.2.6 Aqueous Electrolytes
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [86] Liu, J.H., Yang, C., Chi, X.W., et al.: Water/sulfolane hybrid electrolyte achieves ultralow-temperature operation for high-voltage aqueous lithium-ion batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 32, 2106811 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202106811 source
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The LiDFOB-LiBF 4 dual-salt in EC/dimethyl sulfite (DMS)/EMC solvents also showed an acceptable ionic conductivity of 1 mS cm -1 at -40 °C, especially enhanced capacity retention at LTs.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 3 Salts
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“At -10 °C and C/10, the FM electrolyte retained 98.3% of its RT capacity, while the EC-DEC electrolyte only delivered 86.2%, as shown in Fig. 11a.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.2.5 Liquified Gas Electrolytes (LGEs)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although the WiSE effectively brings the freezing point down, the salt will crystallize out when the concentration of salt exceeds a certain threshold.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.2.6 Aqueous Electrolytes
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A novel LHCE system has been designed by using LiTFSI and LiDFOB as dual-salt, inexpensive and commonly used TMS (sulfolane) and EA as solvents and HFE (hydrofluoroether) as diluent.The synergistic effect of multiple components prevents the freezing of the electrolyte even at -80 °C, thus enabling an NMC532-Li cell having 75% RT capacity at -40 °C, and fast-charge/discharge cyclic stability at a 1”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 3 Salts
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [108] Lin, S.S., Hua, H.M., Lai, P.B., et al.: A multifunctional dual-salt localized high-concentration electrolyte for fast dynamic high-voltage lithium battery in wide temperature range. Adv. Energy Mater. 11, 2101775 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202101775 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“As a result, the hybrid WiSE with an optimal concentration of 5 M demonstrates improved conductivity, decreased viscosity and a lowered freezing temperature compared to the 21 M WiSE [83].”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.2.6 Aqueous Electrolytes
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [83] Dou, Q.Y., Lei, S.L., Wang, D.W., et al.: Safe and high-rate supercapacitors based on an “acetonitrile/water in salt” hybrid electrolyte. Energy Environ. Sci. 11, 3212–3219 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1039/C8EE01040D source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“This electrolyte is featured with the ability to form stable and highly conducting SEIs on graphite, thus preventing Li plating during charging and securing long battery lifetime at subzero temperatures.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.1.2 Carboxylic Esters
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [47] Yao, Y.X., Yao, N., Zhou, X.R., et al.: Ethylene-carbonate-free electrolytes for rechargeable Li-ion pouch cells at sub-freezing temperatures. Adv. Mater. 34, 2206448 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202206448 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition to the non-aqueous electrolytes, LIBs with aqueous electrolytes have received widespread attention for large-scale energy storage due to their high safety, low cost, environmental amity and higher ionic conductivity compared with commercial LIBs using carbonate electrolytes.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.2.6 Aqueous Electrolytes
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Oxalate-based anions can form good SEIs themselves; hence, their presence can potentially enable the application of solvents like PC and GBL, which have the advantage of low melting points, but suffer from the problem of poor SEI formation [96][97][98][99][100].”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 3 Salts
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [96] Zhang, S.S.: An unique lithium salt for the improved electrolyte of Li-ion battery. Electrochem. Commun. 8, 1423–1428 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elecom.2006.06.016 source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [97] Zhang, S.S.: Electrochemical study of the formation of a solid electrolyte interface on graphite in a LiBC2O4F2-based electrolyte. J. Power Sources 163, 713–718 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.09.040 source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [98] Zhou, L., Lucht, B.L.: Performance of lithium tetrafluorooxalatophosphate (LiFOP) electrolyte with propylene carbonate (PC). J. Power Sources 205, 439–448 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.01.067 source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Chen et al. [68] used a fluorinated carboxylic ester as cosolvent for an LT electrolyte and obtained both low viscosity and high oxidation stability.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.2.3 Fluorinated Solvents
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [68] Holoubek, J., Yu, M.Y., Yu, S.C., et al.: An all-fluorinated ester electrolyte for stable high-voltage Li metal batteries capable of ultra-low-temperature operation. ACS Energy Lett. 5, 1438–1447 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.0c00643 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The LGE based on 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane and pentafluoroethane delivered high ionic conductivity > 3 mS cm -1 within the temperature range from -78 to 80 °C, with non-flammable and fireextinguishing features.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.2.5 Liquified Gas Electrolytes (LGEs)
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [78] Yin, Y.J., Yang, Y., Cheng, D.Y., et al.: Fire-extinguishing, recyclable liquefied gas electrolytes for temperature-resilient lithium-metal batteries. Nat. Energy 7, 548–559 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-022-01051-4 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This is because the ion-solvent interaction is determined by many factors beyond dielectric constants, and “donicity” and “denticity” are two parameters that make ethers an effective solvent for Li + .”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.2.2 Ethers
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“PDF technique differentiated key amorphous components originated from the decomposition of solvents (no good components) or anion (good components), mostly SEI LiF sei .”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 5.2 Understanding the Nature of SEI Layer
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [163] Shadike, Z., Lee, H., Borodin, O., et al.: Identification of LiH and nanocrystalline LiF in the solid-electrolyte interphase of lithium metal anodes. Nat. Nanotechnol. 16, 549–554 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-020-00845-5 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Based on the XPS results (Fig. 15c), lower amounts of LiF and Li 2 CO 3 were generated by decomposition of carbonate electrolytes and LiPF 6 in DMS-presence, indicating more protective nature of as-formed SEI from DMS.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 4.1 Molecular Additives
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [130] Guo, R.D., Che, Y.X., Lan, G.Y., et al.: Tailoring low-temperature performance of a lithium-ion battery via rational designing interphase on an anode. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11, 38285–38293 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b12020 source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“They reported that compared with the SEI formed in conventional carbonate electrolytes without FI additive, the SEI formed in the electrolyte with FI additive was thicker, having thicker inorganic layers but thinner organic layers (Fig. 14c).”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 4.1 Molecular Additives
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [128] Shi, J.L., Ehteshami, N., Ma, J.L., et al.: Improving the graphite/electrolyte interface in lithium-ion battery for fast charging and low temperature operation: fluorosulfonyl isocyanate as electrolyte additive. J. Power Sources 429, 67–74 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.04.113 source
plaindirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The PFPMS was able to participate in both SEI and CEI formation, which stabilizes NCM523 and graphite based on the theoretical calculation and experimental results.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 4.1 Molecular Additives
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [129] Yang, T.X., Fan, W.Z., Wang, C.Y., et al.: 2,3,4,5,6-Pentafluorophenyl methanesulfonate as a versatile electrolyte additive matches LiNi0.5Co0.2Mn0.3O2/graphite batteries working in a wide-temperature range. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10, 31735–31744 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b04743 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“cells containing PFPMS delivered 72.3% and 66.3% of the RT capacity when discharged at -20 °C, with 0.2 C and 0.5 C rates, respectively, better than 67.8% and 55.0% for the cells without additives and 70.5% and 62.1% for the cells with 1% VC additive under the same conditions.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 4.1 Molecular Additives
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [129] Yang, T.X., Fan, W.Z., Wang, C.Y., et al.: 2,3,4,5,6-Pentafluorophenyl methanesulfonate as a versatile electrolyte additive matches LiNi0.5Co0.2Mn0.3O2/graphite batteries working in a wide-temperature range. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10, 31735–31744 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b04743 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Differing from conventional bulk LiF, they discovered a new type of LiF differing from bulk LiF, and named it as SEI (LiF) sei , which has unique structural features including larger lattice parameter and smaller grain size (< 3 nm), and is favored for Li + transport.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 5.2 Understanding the Nature of SEI Layer
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [163] Shadike, Z., Lee, H., Borodin, O., et al.: Identification of LiH and nanocrystalline LiF in the solid-electrolyte interphase of lithium metal anodes. Nat. Nanotechnol. 16, 549–554 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-020-00845-5 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“According to the electrochemical measurements, an electrolyte with the EMI-BF 4 additive showed higher reduction potential (0.95 V of EMI, 1.7 V of BF 4 ), and lower oxidation potential (~ 3.5 V) compared to carbonate solvents, implying that this additive can participate in the formation of the SEI and the CEI.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 4.3 Ionic Liquid Additives
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [144] Wang, W.L., Yang, T.X., Li, S., et al.: 1-Ethyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate (EMI-BF4) as an ionic liquid-type electrolyte additive to enhance the low-temperature performance of LiNi0.5Co0.2Mn0.3O2/graphite batteries. Electrochimica Acta 317, 146–154 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2019.05.027 source
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“According to the EIS data (Fig. 16c, d), both LiBOB and VC increased the SEI impedance at anodes as compared with baseline electrolytes but decreased the CEI impedance at cathodes.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 4.2 Ionic Additives
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Such Cs + containing interphase is stable, ultrathin, and compact, leading to significant improvement in battery performance.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 4.2 Ionic Additives
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [140] Xiang, H.F., Mei, D.H., Yan, P.F., et al.: The role of cesium cation in controlling interphasial chemistry on graphite anode in propylene carbonate-rich electrolytes. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7, 20687–20695 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b05552 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The graphite||LiNi 0.8 Co 0.15 Al 0.05 O 2 (NCA) pouch cell using 1.0 M LiPF 6 in EC:PC:EMC (1:1:8, weight ratio) with 0.05 M CsPF 6 delivered 68% capacity at -40 °C and C/5 rate, much higher than that of conventional electrolytes (20%) [141].”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 4.2 Ionic Additives
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [141] Li, Q.Y., Jiao, S.H., Luo, L.L., et al.: Wide-temperature electrolytes for lithium-ion batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9, 18826–18835 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b04099 source
plaindirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The cells using DMS electrolytes showed the best results (Fig. 15d), which delivered 74.28% of RT capacity, followed by the DTD-based cell (68.64%) and the electrolyte without additive (66.44%).”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 4.1 Molecular Additives
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [130] Guo, R.D., Che, Y.X., Lan, G.Y., et al.: Tailoring low-temperature performance of a lithium-ion battery via rational designing interphase on an anode. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11, 38285–38293 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b12020 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“However, the cells using such electrolyte encounter solvent intercalation into graphite anodes because no stable SEI can be formed at an insufficient content of EC.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 4.2 Ionic Additives
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [99] Zhang, S.S., Xu, K., Jow, T.R.: Enhanced performance of Li-ion cell with LiBF4-PC based electrolyte by addition of small amount of LiBOB. J. Power Sources 156, 629–633 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.04.023 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Although the inorganic layer was thicker by using FI, it is mainly composed of LiF, ROSO 2 Li, Li 2 S, Li 2 SO 3 and a low concentration of Li 2 CO 3 , Li 2 O and Li x PF y O z , resulting in overall lower interface resistance.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 4.1 Molecular Additives
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [128] Shi, J.L., Ehteshami, N., Ma, J.L., et al.: Improving the graphite/electrolyte interface in lithium-ion battery for fast charging and low temperature operation: fluorosulfonyl isocyanate as electrolyte additive. J. Power Sources 429, 67–74 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.04.113 source
plaindirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“It was reported that isocyanate-based additives can be electrochemically polymerized and form polyamide-like SEIs.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 4.1 Molecular Additives
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [128] Shi, J.L., Ehteshami, N., Ma, J.L., et al.: Improving the graphite/electrolyte interface in lithium-ion battery for fast charging and low temperature operation: fluorosulfonyl isocyanate as electrolyte additive. J. Power Sources 429, 67–74 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.04.113 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“According to the XPS results (Fig. 15b), this low impedance SEI was composed of S-containing decomposition products (i.e., ROSO 2 Li), and less LiF and Li 2 CO 3 , yielding faster ionic transportation.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 4.1 Molecular Additives
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [129] Yang, T.X., Fan, W.Z., Wang, C.Y., et al.: 2,3,4,5,6-Pentafluorophenyl methanesulfonate as a versatile electrolyte additive matches LiNi0.5Co0.2Mn0.3O2/graphite batteries working in a wide-temperature range. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10, 31735–31744 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b04743 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“According to EIS results, the DMSbased electrolyte system had the lowest R sei and R ct at both RT and LT, indicating more ionic conductive SEIs formed by DMS.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 4.1 Molecular Additives
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [130] Guo, R.D., Che, Y.X., Lan, G.Y., et al.: Tailoring low-temperature performance of a lithium-ion battery via rational designing interphase on an anode. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11, 38285–38293 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b12020 source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The fluorination of polar solvent could enhance the electronegativity and reduce the polarity”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 4.1 Molecular Additives
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [127] Wang, Z.X., Sun, Z.H., Shi, Y., et al.: Ion-dipole chemistry drives rapid evolution of Li ions solvation sheath in low-temperature Li batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 11, 2100935 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202100935 source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The relative contents of LiH, LiF and dead Li 0 in SEI are quantified, showing higher (LiF) sei and lower dead Li 0 contents in SEIs recovered from the HCE compared with their LCE counterparts.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 5.2 Understanding the Nature of SEI Layer
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [163] Shadike, Z., Lee, H., Borodin, O., et al.: Identification of LiH and nanocrystalline LiF in the solid-electrolyte interphase of lithium metal anodes. Nat. Nanotechnol. 16, 549–554 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-020-00845-5 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“the cell containing EMI-BF 4 additive kept 89.4% capacity retention, higher than 81% for the baseline electrolyte after cycling at -10 °C after 150 cycles (Fig. 20b).”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 4.3 Ionic Liquid Additives
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [144] Wang, W.L., Yang, T.X., Li, S., et al.: 1-Ethyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate (EMI-BF4) as an ionic liquid-type electrolyte additive to enhance the low-temperature performance of LiNi0.5Co0.2Mn0.3O2/graphite batteries. Electrochimica Acta 317, 146–154 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2019.05.027 source
plaincorrelationalSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“According to the morphology and composition characterization results, a thin, dense and smooth SEI layer containing more inorganic components such as LiF and Li 2 CO 3 was formed on graphite anodes, showing the capability to protect the graphite anode through 100 cycles at 0 °C.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 4.2 Ionic Additives
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [142] Yang, B.W., Zhang, H., Yu, L., et al.: Lithium difluorophosphate as an additive to improve the low temperature performance of LiNi0.5Co0.2Mn0.3O2/graphite cells. Electrochimica Acta 221, 107–114 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2016.10.037 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“once ionic liquid is introduced into a liquid electrolyte, it is no longer an ionic liquid anymore, but an ionic additive dissolved by non-aqueous solvents.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 4.3 Ionic Liquid Additives
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“CH 3 OSO experienced less structural change after combining with Li + compared to DTD, implying a stabler structure in this SEI.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 4.1 Molecular Additives
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [130] Guo, R.D., Che, Y.X., Lan, G.Y., et al.: Tailoring low-temperature performance of a lithium-ion battery via rational designing interphase on an anode. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11, 38285–38293 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b12020 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The thickness reduction of the organic species layer was attributed to the suppression of carbonate solvent decomposition, while the increased thickness of the inorganic layer was attributed to the FI-derived SEI components.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 4.1 Molecular Additives
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [128] Shi, J.L., Ehteshami, N., Ma, J.L., et al.: Improving the graphite/electrolyte interface in lithium-ion battery for fast charging and low temperature operation: fluorosulfonyl isocyanate as electrolyte additive. J. Power Sources 429, 67–74 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.04.113 source
plaindirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“By utilizing PFPMS as an additive, lower cell polarization and higher capacity retention were obtained at LTs (Fig. 15a).”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 4.1 Molecular Additives
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [129] Yang, T.X., Fan, W.Z., Wang, C.Y., et al.: 2,3,4,5,6-Pentafluorophenyl methanesulfonate as a versatile electrolyte additive matches LiNi0.5Co0.2Mn0.3O2/graphite batteries working in a wide-temperature range. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10, 31735–31744 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b04743 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“After one-electron reduction, one of the C-O bonds is broken, the resulted radicals are then self-polymerized, and the combination of this polymer anion and lithium cation constructed the SEI on graphite.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 4.2 Ionic Additives
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [143] Liao, B., Li, H.Y., Xu, M.Q., et al.: Designing low impedance interface films simultaneously on anode and cathode for high energy batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 8, 1800802 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201800802 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“At -20 °C, the retention of RT capacity of graphite||NMC532 cells using LiPO 2 F 2 additive was 71.9%, much better than the 49.4% for the baseline electrolyte.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 4.2 Ionic Additives
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [142] Yang, B.W., Zhang, H., Yu, L., et al.: Lithium difluorophosphate as an additive to improve the low temperature performance of LiNi0.5Co0.2Mn0.3O2/graphite cells. Electrochimica Acta 221, 107–114 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2016.10.037 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The electrolyte using DTD additive has the highest cycling capacity retention at -15 °C due to its lowest impedance, which distinctly improved the LT battery performance.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 4.1 Molecular Additives
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [110] Wu, Z.L., Li, S.G., Zheng, Y.Z., et al.: The roles of sulfur-containing additives and their working mechanism on the temperature-dependent performances of Li-ion batteries. J. Electrochem. Soc. 165, A2792–A2800 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0331811jes source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“DMS reduction products (CH 3 OSO) has lower binding energy with Li + compared that of DTD (OCH 2 CH 2 SO 3 ), suggesting a faster ionic migration through such SEI.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 4.1 Molecular Additives
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [130] Guo, R.D., Che, Y.X., Lan, G.Y., et al.: Tailoring low-temperature performance of a lithium-ion battery via rational designing interphase on an anode. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11, 38285–38293 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b12020 source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The PC decomposition and graphite exfoliation were effectively suppressed by adjusting the EC/PC ratio in electrolytes to achieve a reductive decomposition of Cs + -(EC) m (1 ⩽ m ⩽ 2) complex preceding that of Li + -(PC) n (3⩽ n ⩽ 5) (Fig. 17a).”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 4.2 Ionic Additives
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [140] Xiang, H.F., Mei, D.H., Yan, P.F., et al.: The role of cesium cation in controlling interphasial chemistry on graphite anode in propylene carbonate-rich electrolytes. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7, 20687–20695 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b05552 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“by using EMI-BF 4 as an additive, a graphite||NCM523 cell can deliver 45.8% of RT capacity when discharged at -30 °C, much higher compared to the baseline electrolyte without additive (16.3%)”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 4.3 Ionic Liquid Additives
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [144] Wang, W.L., Yang, T.X., Li, S., et al.: 1-Ethyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate (EMI-BF4) as an ionic liquid-type electrolyte additive to enhance the low-temperature performance of LiNi0.5Co0.2Mn0.3O2/graphite batteries. Electrochimica Acta 317, 146–154 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2019.05.027 source
plaindirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The discharge capacity retention at -30 °C for the baseline electrolyte was quite low at only 14%, in strong contrast with the capacity retention of 49% at -30 °C from the cell with 1% LiDFBOP additive.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 4.2 Ionic Additives
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [143] Liao, B., Li, H.Y., Xu, M.Q., et al.: Designing low impedance interface films simultaneously on anode and cathode for high energy batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 8, 1800802 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201800802 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Li plating and the above concomitant processes can cause internal short and irreversible capacity loss.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 4.2 Ionic Additives
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“According to the XPS results of graphite after 100 cycles shown in Fig. 15e, less inorganic species (LiF, Li 2 CO 3 ) were observed on graphite surface while using PhMs additive, thereby decreasing the resistance.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 4.1 Molecular Additives
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [131] Lin, Y.C., Yue, X.P., Zhang, H., et al.: Using phenyl methanesulfonate as an electrolyte additive to improve performance of LiNi0.5Co0.2Mn0.3O2/graphite cells at low temperature. Electrochimica Acta 300, 202–207 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2019.01.120 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This unbalanced kinetics on anodes and cathodes at LTs resulted in higher polarization on the anode side while accelerating delithiation of cathodes and increased the possibility for lithium plating.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 4.2 Ionic Additives
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The DTD system also had lower resistance compared to baseline at RT, while the charge transfer resistance of the DTD system at LT increased significantly and was even higher than the baseline electrolyte, implying sluggish charge transfer of DTD formed SEIs at LTs.”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 4.1 Molecular Additives
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [130] Guo, R.D., Che, Y.X., Lan, G.Y., et al.: Tailoring low-temperature performance of a lithium-ion battery via rational designing interphase on an anode. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11, 38285–38293 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b12020 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
A systematic review on the related mechanism of low-temperature electrolytes is still quite limited.
“However, the systematic review on the related mechanism is still quite limited.”
The paper relies on this without support.
SEI components derived from decomposition of anions are generally better than those derived from solvent decomposition.
“the SEI components derived from the decomposition of anions are generally better than those derived from solvent decomposition.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Electrode materials are less critical for the LT operation of LIBs compared to electrolytes.
“Electrode materials are less critical for the LT operation of LIBs compared to electrolytes.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.1.2 Carboxylic Esters
“Moreover, the MA-based EC-free electrolyte developed by Zhang's group shows exceptional LT performance [47].”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 2.1.2 Carboxylic Esters
“A novel EC-based electrolyte was designed by taking the advantages of muti-components:”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 4.1 Molecular Additives
“elemental sulfur and allyl disulfide were also reported to have the capability to reduce SEI impedance as well, which can effectively improve LT battery performance [116,117].”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 5.4 Preventing Lithium Plating on Graphite Surface at LTs
“2 wt% allyl sulfide”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 4.2 Ionic Additives
“The capacity retention after 200 cycles was increased from 57% to 94% at 0 °C and C/5 rate after adding LiDFBOP (Fig. 19c).”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 4.3 Ionic Liquid Additives
“c Cyclic stability and Coulombic efficiency of graphite||LiNi 0.5 Co 0.2 Mn 0.3 O 2 cell in baseline and 1% LiDFBOP-containing electrolytes under 0.5 C at a potential range of 3.00-4.35V at 0 °C.”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 5.4 Preventing Lithium Plating on Graphite Surface at LTs
“L EAn represents a mixture of EC and AN”
§ Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries > 5.4 Preventing Lithium Plating on Graphite Surface at LTs
“L EAn represents EC-PN mixture”
Citations
Cites
Issues and challenges facing rechargeable lithium batteries
Tarascon, J. ‐., & Armand, M. B. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35104644 · Cited by 21,450 · cited 1×
“Since the commercialization of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) by Sony in 1990s, the high energy and long cycle life of LIBs have made them the choice of power systems for mobile electronics, electric vehicles and large-scale grid storage [1, 2].”
Towards greener and more sustainable batteries for electrical energy storage
Larcher, D., & Tarascon, J. (2014) · Nature Chemistry · doi:10.1038/nchem.2085 · Cited by 7,963
Electrolytes and Interphases in Li-Ion Batteries and Beyond
Xu, K. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500003w · Cited by 5,566 · cited 1×
“Fluorination generally leads to a lower melting point [59], higher oxidation stability [60], better safety characteristics [61], and superior SEI formation capability [62].”
Self-citation“Water-in-salt” electrolyte enables high-voltage aqueous lithium-ion chemistries
Suo, L., Borodin, O., Gao, T., Olguin, M., Ho, J., Fan, X., Luo, C., Wang, C., & Xu, K. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aab1595 · Cited by 3,821 · cited 1×
“Suo et al. [79] firstly developed WiSEs to broaden the voltage window of electrolytes to 3 V, where a high concentration (21 M) of LiTFSI salt was dissolved in water and an anion-derived SEI was formed to inhibit the decomposition of water.”
Self-citationHigh rate and stable cycling of lithium metal anode
Qian, J., Henderson, W. A., Xu, W., Bhattacharya, P., Engelhard, M., Borodin, O., & Zhang, J.-G. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms7362 · Cited by 2,561 · cited 1×
“When the electrolytes containing high concentration of these salts are used in Li metal anode cells, they can form salt anion-derived SEI with a LiF-rich component which is beneficial for anode protection and electrochemical performance [104].”
Self-citationAdvances and issues in developing salt-concentrated battery electrolytes
Yamada, Y., Wang, J., Ko, S., Watanabe, E., & Yamada, A. (2019) · Nature Energy · doi:10.1038/s41560-019-0336-z · Cited by 1,913 · cited 1×
“LHCE could be one of the promising approaches for improving the LT performance of LIBs, based on their successful application in stabilizing SEIs on lithium metal anodes and improving the performance of LMBs in wide-temperature ranges [62, 150].”
Fluoroethylene Carbonate Additives to Render Uniform Li Deposits in Lithium Metal Batteries
Zhang, X., Cheng, X., Chen, X., Yan, C., & Zhang, Q. (2017) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.201605989 · Cited by 1,699 · cited 1×
“…and LMA systems, as it can participate in SEI formation due to its higher reduction potential compared to non-fluorinated carbonates, enhancing its capability in forming a LiF-rich SEI to protect graphite and LMA, which in turn improves the cycling stability and capacity retention at RT [123, 124].”
Atomic structure of sensitive battery materials and interfaces revealed by cryo–electron microscopy
Li, Y., Li, Y., Pei, A., Yan, K., Sun, Y., Wu, C.-L., Joubert, L.-M., Chin, R., Koh, A. L., Yu, Y., et al. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aam6014 · Cited by 1,547 · cited 2×
“Another examples are using cryogenic TEM (cryo-EM) to study SEIs, as represented by the pioneer works from the research groups led by Meng [164] and Cui [165].”
Non-flammable electrolyte enables Li-metal batteries with aggressive cathode chemistries
Fan, X., Chen, L., Borodin, O. A., Ji, X. Y., Chen, J., Hou, S., Deng, T., Zheng, J., Yang, C., Liou, S., et al. (2018) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41565-018-0183-2 · Cited by 1,375
Self-citationAdvanced Model for Solid Electrolyte Interphase Electrodes in Liquid and Polymer Electrolytes
Peled, E., Golodnitsky, D., & Ardel, G. (1997) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/1.1837858 · Cited by 1,205 · cited 1×
“The SEI formed in this standard electrolyte resembles the mosaic structure predicted by Peled et al. [166], who described the SEI as a heterogeneous distribution of inorganic and organic components.”
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Celadon, A., Sun, H., Sun, S., & Zhang, G. (2024) · SusMat · doi:10.1002/sus2.234 · Cited by 111
“66 However, their immense potential suggests that once matured, this technology could secure a significant position in the EV battery market.”
Reviving ether-based electrolytes for sodium-ion batteries
Cheng, F., Hu, J. P., Zhang, W., Guo, B., Yu, P., Sun, X. A., & Peng, J. (2025) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/d5ee00725a · Cited by 106
Moderate solvation structures of lithium ions for high-voltage lithium metal batteries at −40 °C
Wei, Y. J., Wang, H., Lin, X., Wang, T., Cui, Y., Huang, Y. T., Yang, J., Liu, T., Ren, Y., Fan, X., et al. (2024) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/d4ee03192j · Cited by 104
Gao, Y., Yuan, Y., Huang, S., Yao, N., Yu, L., Chen, Y., Zhang, Q., & Chen, X. (2024) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.202416506 · Cited by 61
Guo, J. L., Li, Y., Xu, K., et al. (2024) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.202411760 · Cited by 55
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Tan, S., Shadike, Z., Cai, X., Lin, R., Kludze, A., Borodin, O., Lucht, B. L., Wang, C., Hu, E., Xu, K., & Yang, X.-Q.
- Affiliations
- Brookhaven National Laboratory (US)
- Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
- Cornell University (US)
- DEVCOM Army Research Laboratory (US)
- University of Rhode Island (US)
- University of Maryland, College Park (US)
- Corresponding author
- Shadike, Zulipiya
- Hu, Enyuan
- Xu, Kang
- Yang, Xiao-Qing
- ORCID
- Venue
- Electrochemical Energy Reviews
- Published
- 2023-11-28
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 2520-8136 (ISSN-L)
- 2520-8489
- OpenAlex
- W4389398624
- Semantic Scholar
- e71fc8e2235982f891a25ff88fbd40d0ace5de06
- Cited by
- 118
- References
- 170
- Citations by year
- 2026: 40 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 25
- FWCI
- 8.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- correction (2024-01-19)
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Electrochemical Energy Reviews (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Energy (DE-SC0012704)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advancements in Battery Materials
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Battery Modeling and Management
- Keywords
- low-temperature electrolytes, lithium-ion batteries, lithium metal batteries, electrolyte engineering, lithium ion transport, solid electrolyte interphase, electrolyte additives, electrolyte solvents, electrolyte salts
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-28, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-28 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review