The DOI matches its Crossref record; 194 of the 203 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 3 of the 182 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
The effects of early life stress on reward processing
Open accessAbstract
Early life stress (ELS), in the form of childhood maltreatment, abuse, or neglect, increases the risk for psychiatric sequelae later in life. The neurobiology of response to early stress and of reward processing overlap substantially, leading to the prediction that reward processing may be a primary mediator of the effects of early life stress. We describe a growing body of literature investigating the effects of early life stressors on reward processing in animals and humans. Despite variation in the reviewed studies, an emerging pattern of results indicates that ELS results in deficits of ventral striatum-related functions of reward responsiveness and approach motivation, especially when the stressor is experienced in early in development. For stressors experienced later in the juvenile period and adolescence, the animal literature suggests an opposite effect, in which ELS results in increased hedonic drive. Future research in this area will help elucidate the transdiagnostic impact of early life stress, and therefore potentially identify and intervene with at-risk youth, prior to the emergence of clinical psychopathology.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This review integrates animal and human evidence on how early life stress (ELS) shapes reward processing, arguing that effects depend on stressor type and developmental timing. It proposes that ELS-related reward alterations may serve as transdiagnostic risk markers and potential intervention targets.
Key findings
- In animal models, maternal separation often reduced reward responsiveness and approach motivation, but sucrose preference findings were mixed: decreased preference appeared in 4 of 5 studies using male Sprague Dawley rats versus 1 of 6 studies using male Wistar rats. Post-weaning social isolation more consistently increased hedonic/approach-motivation measures while impairing cognitive flexibility and reward learning.
- Human fMRI studies generally linked ELS to reduced basal ganglia/ventral striatal activation during reward anticipation and/or delivery, especially when adversity occurred earlier in life. Low maternal warmth was an exception, associated with increased medial prefrontal and striatal activation during reward anticipation.
- Reduced striatal reward responses were often associated with depressive symptoms and sometimes mediated the relationship between ELS and depression; similar patterns were reported for alcohol dependence, while ADHD showed comparable ventral striatal activity without mediation.
- Timing appeared important: earlier stressors such as maternal separation or early institutionalization more often reduced approach motivation and reward responsiveness, whereas later periadolescent stressors such as social isolation or low parental warmth could increase reward sensitivity.
Methods
- Systematic PubMed review of human and animal studies published before December 9, 2017, using ELS-related terms combined with reward-related terms; animal searches used maternal separation, social isolation, or early life stress with reward, reinforcement, or sucrose preference terms.
- Inclusion required ELS exposure and a behavioral measure of reward processing; human studies also required fMRI with a reward task. Studies of drug reward were excluded, and data were extracted by at least two authors.
- The review synthesizes preclinical behavioral and neurobiological findings with human neuroimaging results, applying NIMH Research Domain Criteria Positive Valence Systems constructs where possible.
Limitations
- Stated: the human literature is smaller than the animal literature; studies vary in ELS type and timing, age at testing, and methods. Animal maternal separation work is especially heterogeneous in separation procedures, control groups, statistical approaches, strain, sex, and unreported laboratory conditions. Animal models cannot fully capture human ELS, and human fMRI tasks often lack behavioral measures.
- Stated: parsing specific reward subcomponents is limited by task precision, since many paradigms engage more than one process.
- Evident: this is a narrative synthesis rather than a meta-analysis, so findings are not quantitatively pooled and publication bias is not assessed; proposed interventions targeting reward processing in ELS-exposed populations remain untested in the reviewed literature.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
95 Not checked yet · 32 Own interpretation · 14 No basis given · 1 Supported so far · 1 Partly supported · 1 Own method · accuracy not yet measured
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“studies of the effect of maternal separation on liking/responsiveness to reward are notable for such methodological differences as duration and frequency of maternal separation, temperature during separation, control group comparison, and sex of the animals.”
§ The Effects of Early Life Stress on Reward Processing > 4. ELS and Reward Processing: Preclinical Data > 4.2 Effects of ELS on Reward Processing in Animal Models
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“One difficulty in characterizing the maternal separation literature is the wide variety of separation methods, control groups, and statistical methods that have been utilized (Lehmann and Feldon, 2000; Tractenberg et al., 2016).”
§ The Effects of Early Life Stress on Reward Processing > 4. ELS and Reward Processing: Preclinical Data > 4.2 Effects of ELS on Reward Processing in Animal Models
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lehmann and Feldon, 2000
- Not checked yetcites Tractenberg et al., 2016 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While the majority of available data on ELS and reward processing is from animals subjected to either neonatal maternal separation or juvenile peer isolation, we also highlight results from other paradigms, such as social defeat stress, social instability, and chronic variable stress.”
§ The Effects of Early Life Stress on Reward Processing > 4. ELS and Reward Processing: Preclinical Data
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Specifically, 4 out of the 5 studies using Sprague Dawley male rats demonstrated decreased sucrose preference following maternal separation.”
§ The Effects of Early Life Stress on Reward Processing > 4. ELS and Reward Processing: Preclinical Data > 4.2 Effects of ELS on Reward Processing in Animal Models
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In addition to changes to approach motivation and reward responsiveness, evidence exists for alterations of various types of reward learning as a result of maternal separation.”
§ The Effects of Early Life Stress on Reward Processing > 4. ELS and Reward Processing: Preclinical Data > 4.2 Effects of ELS on Reward Processing in Animal Models
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Review of the methodological approaches in relation to the pattern of findings did not reveal factors responsible for the variable outcomes, other than a likely role of strain of animal.”
§ The Effects of Early Life Stress on Reward Processing > 4. ELS and Reward Processing: Preclinical Data > 4.2 Effects of ELS on Reward Processing in Animal Models
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, as with studies of reward-related behaviors, contradictory results exist on the effects of maternal separation on reward-related neurochemistry, as discussed below.”
§ The Effects of Early Life Stress on Reward Processing > 4. ELS and Reward Processing: Preclinical Data > 4.2 Effects of ELS on Reward Processing in Animal Models
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“A similar pattern in rodents was identified by two groups, in which there was decreased willingness to work via progressive reinforcement but unchanged consumption of sucrose when it was given freely (Rüedi-Bettschen et al., 2005) or provided on a fixed ratio (Campbell et al., 2017).”
§ The Effects of Early Life Stress on Reward Processing > 4. ELS and Reward Processing: Preclinical Data > 4.2 Effects of ELS on Reward Processing in Animal Models
What the sources say
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In Wistar male rats, decreased sucrose preference was found in only 1 out of 6 studies.”
§ The Effects of Early Life Stress on Reward Processing > 4. ELS and Reward Processing: Preclinical Data > 4.2 Effects of ELS on Reward Processing in Animal Models
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Not surprisingly, observed effects have been conflicting.”
§ The Effects of Early Life Stress on Reward Processing > 4. ELS and Reward Processing: Preclinical Data > 4.2 Effects of ELS on Reward Processing in Animal Models
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- It may state two separate claims as one. 67
- Probably not a substantial claim. 23
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“dopamine from the nucleus accumbens is important for the ability of rewarding cues to gain incentive salience and elicit instrumental behavior (Peciña et al., 2003; Wyvell and Berridge, 2000).”
§ The Effects of Early Life Stress on Reward Processing > 3. Overview of Reward Processing
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Peciña et al., 2003 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction says dopamine systems may increase the incentive value of reward stimuli, and the ‘Dopamine enhances wanting for sweet rewards’ section links elevated dopamine to more eager, direct runway behavior. The paper does not establish that dopamine specifically from the nucleus accumbens produces these effects: its DAT knockdown is not restricted to that region. (LLM, conf=0.85)
- Not checked yetcites Wyvell and Berridge, 2000
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“This is an important concept in the field of addiction (Burke and Miczek, 2014b; George et al., 2012; Sinha, 2008), that is hypothesized to mediate the relationship between ELS and increased risk of substance use disorders (Andersen and Teicher, 2009).”
§ The Effects of Early Life Stress on Reward Processing > 4. ELS and Reward Processing: Preclinical Data > 4.2 Effects of ELS on Reward Processing in Animal Models
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Burke and Miczek, 2014b
- Supportedcites George et al., 2012 source
George et al. is cited for the first clause: that the concept is important in addiction. The Allostasis section describes allostasis as a framework for understanding vulnerability to drug addiction. The separate hypothesis about early-life stress is cited to Andersen and Teicher, not George et al. (LLM, conf=0.87)
- Supportedcites Sinha, 2008 source
Sinha (2008) is cited for the first clause: that the link is an important concept in addiction. The “Stress and the Development of Addictive Behaviors” section says major addiction theories assign stress an important role. The mediation hypothesis in the second clause is cited to Andersen and Teicher (2009), not Sinha. (LLM, conf=0.90)
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Other factors, such as sex of animal or duration/length of separation, did not account for variation in results.”
§ The Effects of Early Life Stress on Reward Processing > 4. ELS and Reward Processing: Preclinical Data > 4.2 Effects of ELS on Reward Processing in Animal Models
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In one frequently cited study in marmoset monkeys, daily bouts of isolation from parents for the first month of life resulted in unchanged free consumption of a sweet solution at seven months, but decreased effort expenditure on a progressive reinforcement schedule (Pryce et al., 2004).”
§ The Effects of Early Life Stress on Reward Processing > 4. ELS and Reward Processing: Preclinical Data > 4.2 Effects of ELS on Reward Processing in Animal Models
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Pryce et al., 2004 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Deficits in the ability to alter behavior based on changing reward cues, known as reversal learning, have also been reported with parental deprivation in monkeys (Pryce et al., 2004) and maternal separation in rats (Matthews et al., 1996a).”
§ The Effects of Early Life Stress on Reward Processing > 4. ELS and Reward Processing: Preclinical Data > 4.2 Effects of ELS on Reward Processing in Animal Models
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Pryce et al., 2004 source
- Not checked yetcites Matthews et al., 1996a
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Maternal separation was also associated with decreased conditioned locomotor activity to food-related cues (Matthews et al., 1996b, 1996a) as well as decreased conditioned place preference to chocolate (Sasagawa et al., 2017) indicative of a decreased reward valuation/incentive salience function within the approach motivation construct.”
§ The Effects of Early Life Stress on Reward Processing > 4. ELS and Reward Processing: Preclinical Data > 4.2 Effects of ELS on Reward Processing in Animal Models
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Matthews et al., 1996b
- Not checked yetcites Matthews et al., 1996a
- Not checked yetcites Sasagawa et al., 2017 source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Changes to the opioid system are also apparent with maternal separation, but conflicting results also exist based on specific methodology, demonstrating both increases and decreases in levels of endogenous peptides (Ploj et al., 2003; Vazquez et al., 2005) as well as sensitivity to ligands (Kalinichev et al., 2001; Vazquez et al., 2005).”
§ The Effects of Early Life Stress on Reward Processing > 4. ELS and Reward Processing: Preclinical Data > 4.2 Effects of ELS on Reward Processing in Animal Models
What the sources say
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Several studies found that while maternal separation by itself did not result in changes in sucrose preference, occurrence of a second stressor or challenge in adolescence or adulthood resulted in reduced sucrose preference (Hill et al., 2014; Klug and van den Buuse, 2012; Uchida et al., 2010).”
§ The Effects of Early Life Stress on Reward Processing > 4. ELS and Reward Processing: Preclinical Data > 4.2 Effects of ELS on Reward Processing in Animal Models
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“there are data showing that cognitive remediation, including working memory training and mindfulness, can enhance reward processing in non-clinical populations with high trait social anhedonia (Li et al., 2016) and in prescription opioid abusers (Garland, 2016).”
§ The Effects of Early Life Stress on Reward Processing > 1. Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Li et al., 2016
- Not checked yetcites Garland, 2016 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Data were extracted by no fewer than two separate authors to ensure accuracy and limit bias (Tables 1, 2).”
§ The Effects of Early Life Stress on Reward Processing > 2. Methods
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Deficits in reward processing are found in MDD (Admon and Pizzagalli, 2015), substance use disorders (Garfield et al., 2014; Tobler et al., 2016), posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (Kalebasi et al., 2015), schizophrenia (McCarthy et al., 2016), and ADHD (van Hulst et al., 2016).”
§ The Effects of Early Life Stress on Reward Processing > 1. Introduction
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“individuals with MDD have similar hedonic responses to sweet solutions compared to controls (Berlin et al., 1998), but are less likely to engage in tasks requiring higher amounts of effort (Treadway et al., 2012).”
§ The Effects of Early Life Stress on Reward Processing > 3. Overview of Reward Processing
What the sources say
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The particular psychopathological trajectory might depend on the type of ELS (Carr et al., 2013) and the developmental window in which the stress was experienced (Andersen et al., 2008), as well as genetic and epigenetic risk and protective factors (Caspi et al., 2003; Palma-Gudiel and Fañanás, 2016).”
§ The Effects of Early Life Stress on Reward Processing > 1. Introduction
What the sources say
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Early life stress has been found to both exaggerate and attenuate the activity of the HPA axis in response to stress, both phenomena which have been linked to psychopathology (Carpenter et al., 2009; Heim C et al., 2000; Tyrka et al., 2008).”
§ The Effects of Early Life Stress on Reward Processing > 1. Introduction
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“receptors for CRF and glucocorticoids are located throughout the reward circuitry of the brain, with their activation or blockade affecting reward-sensitive neurotransmission and behaviors (Bryce and Floresco, 2016; Craenenbroeck et al., 2005; Walsh et al., 2014).”
§ The Effects of Early Life Stress on Reward Processing > 1. Introduction
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This overlap between stress neurobiology and reward neurobiology suggests that any change in stress neurobiology is likely to influence reward.”
§ The Effects of Early Life Stress on Reward Processing > 1. Introduction
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, animal models cannot replicate the complexity of human ELS, and the significance of findings for human conditions is not always clear.”
§ The Effects of Early Life Stress on Reward Processing > 1. Introduction
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It should be noted that parsing of various reward processes using the RDoC framework is limited by the precision of the paradigm used, with several paradigms engaging more than one process.”
§ The Effects of Early Life Stress on Reward Processing > 3. Overview of Reward Processing
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Even in individuals who do not meet full diagnostic criteria, alterations in reward processing predict later diagnoses of MDD (Nelson et al., 2016), substance use disorder (Castellanos-Ryan et al., 2011; Garfield et al., 2014), and conduct disorder (Rubia et al., 2009).”
§ The Effects of Early Life Stress on Reward Processing > 1. Introduction
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Variability and co-variation of these factors represent a major challenge in human studies.”
§ The Effects of Early Life Stress on Reward Processing > 1. Introduction
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Antagonism of dopamine receptors or dopamine depletion in the ventral striatum (specifically the nucleus accumbens) reduce the amount of effort an animal will expend to obtain a reward, but often leave intact reward consumption and positive hedonic responses (e.g., affective facial expressions) (Berridge and Robinson, 1998; Salamone and Correa, 2002).”
§ The Effects of Early Life Stress on Reward Processing > 3. Overview of Reward Processing
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Maternal separation interferes with the postnatal regulatory influence that the mother has on the animal’s physiology and development, and is considered by many to be an analog of human child neglect (Carlyle et al., 2012; Pryce et al., 2005).”
§ The Effects of Early Life Stress on Reward Processing > 4. ELS and Reward Processing: Preclinical Data > 4.2 Effects of ELS on Reward Processing in Animal Models
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Carlyle et al., 2012 source
- Not checked yetcites Pryce et al., 2005
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Responsiveness to reward also involves the nucleus accumbens (in addition to other regions, such as the ventral pallidum), but opioids and endocannabinoids are the major neurochemical mediators of reward responsiveness (Mahler et al., 2007; Peciña and Berridge, 2005).”
§ The Effects of Early Life Stress on Reward Processing > 3. Overview of Reward Processing
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Mahler et al., 2007 source
- Not checked yetcites Peciña and Berridge, 2005
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, dopamine in the nucleus accumbens appears to be necessary for the approach motivation aspects of reward processing, but is less involved in the hedonic experience/initial responsiveness to reward.”
§ The Effects of Early Life Stress on Reward Processing > 3. Overview of Reward Processing
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“development of the human brain is protracted compared to other species (Clancy et al., 2001; Miller et al, 2012; Semple et al., 2013), so despite having a more “mature” brain at birth compared to rats, vulnerability to insult remains.”
§ The Effects of Early Life Stress on Reward Processing > 4. ELS and Reward Processing: Preclinical Data > 4.2 Effects of ELS on Reward Processing in Animal Models
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“One of the most common uses of the sucrose preference test is to assess stress-induced anhedonia in animal models of depression, where reduced consumption of sucrose is considered indicative of depressive-like behavior (Willner et al., 1996).”
§ The Effects of Early Life Stress on Reward Processing > 4. ELS and Reward Processing: Preclinical Data > 4.1 Methods Used to Measure Reward Processing in Animals
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Willner et al., 1996 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The reward prediction error, in which changes in dopamine firing encode differences between an expected vs. actual reward outcome, allows for dynamic learning from experience and updates in reward expectations (Gradin et al., 2011; Schultz, 2016).”
§ The Effects of Early Life Stress on Reward Processing > 3. Overview of Reward Processing
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Because most components of reward processing are ultimately subjective phenomena (motivation, hedonic experience), their occurrence in animals can only be inferred by the measurement of behavior.”
§ The Effects of Early Life Stress on Reward Processing > 4. ELS and Reward Processing: Preclinical Data > 4.1 Methods Used to Measure Reward Processing in Animals
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the most common manipulations in animals to model ELS consist of maternal and peer separation.”
§ The Effects of Early Life Stress on Reward Processing > 4. ELS and Reward Processing: Preclinical Data
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“It is in this circuit that information about reward cues, reward value, and required effort is processed, communicated, and then integrated to guide decision-making, facilitate motivation and readiness for action, and eventually result in the experience of pleasure (Rizvi et al., 2016) (Figure 2).”
§ The Effects of Early Life Stress on Reward Processing > 3. Overview of Reward Processing
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Rizvi et al., 2016 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Within the PFC, the orbital frontal cortex encodes and maintains reward value, while the anterior cingulate cortex plays a role in monitoring and determining effort required to obtain rewards (for review see (Rushworth et al., 2011)).”
§ The Effects of Early Life Stress on Reward Processing > 3. Overview of Reward Processing
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Rushworth et al., 2011 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Such reversal is known to depend on an intact orbitofrontal cortex to inhibit the prior learned response (Placek et al., 2013; Rolls, 2016).”
§ The Effects of Early Life Stress on Reward Processing > 4. ELS and Reward Processing: Preclinical Data > 4.1 Methods Used to Measure Reward Processing in Animals
What the sources say
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Observation of orofacial movements is probably the only measure of liking independent of any learning or motivational process (Berridge and Robinson, 1998), but this is rarely studied.”
§ The Effects of Early Life Stress on Reward Processing > 4. ELS and Reward Processing: Preclinical Data > 4.1 Methods Used to Measure Reward Processing in Animals
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Berridge and Robinson, 1998 source
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“conditioned place preference can be conceptualized as probing the “reward valuation” subconstruct within approach motivation, but expectancy is arguably also involved, given the presence of Pavlovian conditioned approach behavior (Flagel et al., 2009; NIMH Research Domain Criteria).”
§ The Effects of Early Life Stress on Reward Processing > 4. ELS and Reward Processing: Preclinical Data > 4.1 Methods Used to Measure Reward Processing in Animals
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Flagel et al., 2009 source
- Not checked yetcites NIMH Research Domain Criteria
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“regions of the prefrontal cortex (PFC) and amygdala are additional key brain areas involved in reward circuitry.”
§ The Effects of Early Life Stress on Reward Processing > 3. Overview of Reward Processing
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Reward value and deviations of expected and actual outcomes are encoded via the amygdala through its projections to the PFC (Lichtenberg et al., 2017; Wassum and Izquierdo, 2015).”
§ The Effects of Early Life Stress on Reward Processing > 3. Overview of Reward Processing
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lichtenberg et al., 2017 source
- Not checked yetcites Wassum and Izquierdo, 2015
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While there are multiple well-validated tests of reward behavior in animals that allow some differentiation between various reward processing components, close scrutiny often reveals that more than one component is likely involved.”
§ The Effects of Early Life Stress on Reward Processing > 4. ELS and Reward Processing: Preclinical Data > 4.1 Methods Used to Measure Reward Processing in Animals
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Dopamine signaling to the basal ganglia, including the nucleus accumbens, also plays a role in what is known as the reward prediction error, a subconstruct of approach motivation.”
§ The Effects of Early Life Stress on Reward Processing > 3. Overview of Reward Processing
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, stressors occurring earlier in life might be more likely to affect subcortical reward functions (approach motivation and reward responsiveness), with those later in adolescence more likely affecting learning, valuation, and effort prediction.”
§ The Effects of Early Life Stress on Reward Processing > 3. Overview of Reward Processing
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Normative development of the brain regions involved in reward processing demonstrates structural and functional changes from childhood to adulthood, with maturation of PFC regions typically delayed compared to that of subcortical regions (Galvan et al., 2006; Mills et al., 2014; Somerville et al., 2011).”
§ The Effects of Early Life Stress on Reward Processing > 3. Overview of Reward Processing
What the sources say
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The conditioned place preference task is thought to measure incentive motivation to seek out cues previously associated with reward (Bardo and Bevins, 2000).”
§ The Effects of Early Life Stress on Reward Processing > 4. ELS and Reward Processing: Preclinical Data > 4.1 Methods Used to Measure Reward Processing in Animals
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Bardo and Bevins, 2000
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“While pre-weaning maternal separation is often conceptualized as early life neglect and results in a depressive-like phenotype (Pryce et al., 2005), post-weaning social isolation during the juvenile and adolescent period produces sensory processing deficits and increases in fear and anxiety-like behavior (Fone and Porkess, 2008; Lukkes et al., 2009).”
§ The Effects of Early Life Stress on Reward Processing > 4. ELS and Reward Processing: Preclinical Data > 4.2 Effects of ELS on Reward Processing in Animal Models
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Fone and Porkess, 2008
- Not checked yetcites Lukkes et al., 2009 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“While pre-weaning maternal separation is often conceptualized as early life neglect and results in a depressive-like phenotype (Pryce et al., 2005), post-weaning social isolation during the juvenile and adolescent period produces sensory processing deficits and increases in fear and anxiety-like behavior (Fone and Porkess, 2008; Lukkes et al., 2009).”
§ The Effects of Early Life Stress on Reward Processing > 4. ELS and Reward Processing: Preclinical Data > 4.2 Effects of ELS on Reward Processing in Animal Models
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Pryce et al., 2005
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The neonatal rat relies upon the dam for protection from predators, nutrition, thermoregulation, and proper elimination of waste (Hofer, 1996).”
§ The Effects of Early Life Stress on Reward Processing > 4. ELS and Reward Processing: Preclinical Data > 4.2 Effects of ELS on Reward Processing in Animal Models
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hofer, 1996 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“These studies support a “two hit” model in which ELS, such as maternal separation, confers vulnerability to symptoms of psychiatric illness, but with symptom onset only occurring after exposure to a subsequent stressor (Bayer et al., 1999; Maynard et al., 2001).”
§ The Effects of Early Life Stress on Reward Processing > 4. ELS and Reward Processing: Preclinical Data > 4.2 Effects of ELS on Reward Processing in Animal Models
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“other studies demonstrate enhanced mesolimbic dopamine function, as evidenced by increased nucleus accumbens dopamine release in response to stress (Brake et al., 2004) or amphetamine (Hall et al., 1999), as well as increased locomotion in response to cocaine (Brake et al., 2004).”
§ The Effects of Early Life Stress on Reward Processing > 4. ELS and Reward Processing: Preclinical Data > 4.2 Effects of ELS on Reward Processing in Animal Models
What the sources say
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These changes suggest that high levels of maternal care enhance HPA axis regulation and allow more control of the endocrine stress cascade and better regulation of emotional behavior.”
§ The Effects of Early Life Stress on Reward Processing > 4. ELS and Reward Processing: Preclinical Data > 4.2 Effects of ELS on Reward Processing in Animal Models
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Matthews and colleagues have demonstrated decreased sensitivity to the enhancing effects of amphetamine and increased sensitivity to the blunting effects of D2 antagonists on behaviors related to approach motivation (Matthews et al., 1996bMatthews and Robbins, 2003).”
§ The Effects of Early Life Stress on Reward Processing > 4. ELS and Reward Processing: Preclinical Data > 4.2 Effects of ELS on Reward Processing in Animal Models
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Matthews et al., 1996b
- Not checked yetcites Matthews and Robbins, 2003
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“reduced conditioning to predictive appetitive cues, while possibly reflecting decreased motivation, might also indicate impairments in associative learning (Matthews et al., 1996a, 1996b).”
§ The Effects of Early Life Stress on Reward Processing > 4. ELS and Reward Processing: Preclinical Data > 4.2 Effects of ELS on Reward Processing in Animal Models
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Matthews et al., 1996a
- Not checked yetcites Matthews et al., 1996b
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“maternal separation results in a greater peak and duration of glucocorticoid release in response to stress, decreased GR expression, increased CRF expression, and reduced benzodiazepine receptor binding (Sánchez et al., 2001).”
§ The Effects of Early Life Stress on Reward Processing > 4. ELS and Reward Processing: Preclinical Data > 4.2 Effects of ELS on Reward Processing in Animal Models
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Sánchez et al., 2001 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Given that maternal separation deprives rat pups from opportunities for maternal care, this paradigm would be expected to result in changes opposite to that seen in rats exposed to high levels of maternal care, and this does appear to be the case (Ladd et al., 2000).”
§ The Effects of Early Life Stress on Reward Processing > 4. ELS and Reward Processing: Preclinical Data > 4.2 Effects of ELS on Reward Processing in Animal Models
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Ladd et al., 2000
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Pups raised by dams who exhibit high levels of maternal care demonstrate increases in hippocampal synaptogenesis (Liu et al., 2000), increased glucocorticoid receptor (GR) mRNA, decreased hypothalamic CRF mRNA (Liu et al., 1997), and increased benzodiazepine receptor binding in brain regions regulating emotion (Caldji et al., 2000b).”
§ The Effects of Early Life Stress on Reward Processing > 4. ELS and Reward Processing: Preclinical Data > 4.2 Effects of ELS on Reward Processing in Animal Models
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Liu et al., 2000
- Not checked yetcites Liu et al., 1997 source
- Not checked yetcites Caldji et al., 2000b
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“One explanation for these divergent findings might be the existence of differences in the timing and duration of separation.”
§ The Effects of Early Life Stress on Reward Processing > 4. ELS and Reward Processing: Preclinical Data > 4.2 Effects of ELS on Reward Processing in Animal Models
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites McCool and Chappell, 2009
- Not checked yetcites Panksepp, 1981 source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“This paradigm also results in deficits in reversal learning (Amitai et al., 2014; Li et al., 2007), as well as in learning new strategies based on a previously unrelated cue (attentional set shifting) (Schrijver and Würbel, 2001).”
§ The Effects of Early Life Stress on Reward Processing > 4. ELS and Reward Processing: Preclinical Data > 4.2 Effects of ELS on Reward Processing in Animal Models
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Amitai et al., 2014 source
- Not checked yetcites Li et al., 2007
- Not checked yetcites Schrijver and Würbel, 2001
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“By depriving animals of the play experiences that normally guide cortical development, post-weaning social isolation is conceptualized as a rodent model of adolescent adversity with long-lasting effects on neurobiology and behavior (Fone and Porkess, 2008; Lukkes et al., 2009; Robbins, 2016).”
§ The Effects of Early Life Stress on Reward Processing > 4. ELS and Reward Processing: Preclinical Data > 4.2 Effects of ELS on Reward Processing in Animal Models
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“While most studies demonstrate decreased activation of the striatal regions in tasks engaging motivational and reward responsiveness processes, this was not the case when the specific stressor investigated was variations in parental warmth.”
§ The Effects of Early Life Stress on Reward Processing > 5. Human Neuroimaging Studies (Table 2)
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“For example, despite enhanced approach motivation compared to socially housed controls, when a reward task requires fewer lever presses, socially isolated rats end up receiving less reward due to perseveration (Morgan and Einon, 1975).”
§ The Effects of Early Life Stress on Reward Processing > 4. ELS and Reward Processing: Preclinical Data > 4.2 Effects of ELS on Reward Processing in Animal Models
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Morgan and Einon, 1975
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“However, in one study, while activation in the ventral striatum and putamen was decreased during anticipation, activity was increased during the delivery phase, but only for positive verbal feedback as opposed to monetary reward (Boecker et al., 2014).”
§ The Effects of Early Life Stress on Reward Processing > 5. Human Neuroimaging Studies (Table 2)
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Boecker et al., 2014 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In tasks measuring liking, social isolation generally results in increased sucrose preference (Brenes and Fornaguera, 2008, 2009; Colonnello et al., 2011; Hall et al., 1998a; Van den Berg et al., 2000), although there are some discrepant reports (McCool and Chappell, 2009; Pisu et al., 2011).”
§ The Effects of Early Life Stress on Reward Processing > 4. ELS and Reward Processing: Preclinical Data > 4.2 Effects of ELS on Reward Processing in Animal Models
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Brenes and Fornaguera, 2008, 2009
- Not checked yetcites Colonnello et al., 2011 source
- Not checked yetcites Hall et al., 1998a
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“While institutionally reared children had decreased ventral striatal response to positive emotional faces (Goff et al., 2013), adolescents with a history of physical and sexual abuse demonstrated increased reactivity to positively valenced social stimuli (Dennison et al., 2016), suggesting a potential difference in the effects of neglect vs abuse.”
§ The Effects of Early Life Stress on Reward Processing > 5. Human Neuroimaging Studies (Table 2)
What the sources say
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Both tasks have two phases, an anticipation phase, in which the subject is given information about the potential for reward, and a delivery phase, in which the reward is received. By measuring brain activity during the anticipation and delivery phases, a motivational component and a reward responsiveness component can be inferred, respectively (Knutson et al., 2000; Lutz and Widmer, 2014; Wang et”
§ The Effects of Early Life Stress on Reward Processing > 5. Human Neuroimaging Studies (Table 2)
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A major difference between the human fMRI studies and the animal studies is that while the animal studies rely almost solely on behavioral measures to infer reward processes, behavioral measures (reaction times, performance) are reported much less frequently in the human literature.”
§ The Effects of Early Life Stress on Reward Processing > 5. Human Neuroimaging Studies (Table 2)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These two studies suggest that, depending on gender and developmental timing of stressor and testing, low maternal warmth may increase the brain’s sensitivity to anticipation of reward.”
§ The Effects of Early Life Stress on Reward Processing > 5. Human Neuroimaging Studies (Table 2)
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“there is some indication that female rats exposed to variable stressors in adolescence (restraint, social defeat) demonstrate subsequent deficits in sucrose consumption (Bourke and Neigh, 2011; Pohl et al., 2007) while male animals do not (Bourke and Neigh, 2011; Novick et al., 2013; Pohl et al., 2007; Toth et al., 2008).”
§ The Effects of Early Life Stress on Reward Processing > 4. ELS and Reward Processing: Preclinical Data > 4.2 Effects of ELS on Reward Processing in Animal Models
What the sources say
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Increased indices of approach motivation are also found following social isolation, with evidence of enhanced responding for increasing concentrations of sucrose (Cuenya et al., 2015; Hall et al., 1997), as well as greater conditioned responses to sucrose-related stimuli (Jones et al., 1990).”
§ The Effects of Early Life Stress on Reward Processing > 4. ELS and Reward Processing: Preclinical Data > 4.2 Effects of ELS on Reward Processing in Animal Models
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“As with maternal separation, post-weaning social isolation results in enhanced sensitivity of the HPA axis, especially in male rats (Holson et al., 1991; Viveros et al., 1988; Weiss et al., 2004), as well as an overall anxiogenic phenotype.”
§ The Effects of Early Life Stress on Reward Processing > 4. ELS and Reward Processing: Preclinical Data > 4.2 Effects of ELS on Reward Processing in Animal Models
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“This relationship was significant when the stress was experienced earlier in life (kindergarten through grade 3) but not later (Hanson et al., 2016).”
§ The Effects of Early Life Stress on Reward Processing > 5. Human Neuroimaging Studies (Table 2)
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hanson et al., 2016 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A similar association was found for adolescent females with low maternal warmth in early adolescence, although increased activity was associated with increased depressive symptoms (Casement et al., 2014).”
§ The Effects of Early Life Stress on Reward Processing > 5. Human Neuroimaging Studies (Table 2)
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Casement et al., 2014 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“For example, women with a history of both childhood sexual abuse and MDD (Pechtel and Pizzagalli, 2013), adolescents exposed to physical abuse (Hanson et al., 2017), and young adults who had high levels of various adversities in early life (Birn et al., 2017) demonstrate decreased reinforcement learning.”
§ The Effects of Early Life Stress on Reward Processing > 5. Human Neuroimaging Studies (Table 2)
What the sources say
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“While changes to reward processing did not mediate the association between ELS and ADHD, similar patterns of ventral striatal activity were found (Boecker et al., 2014).”
§ The Effects of Early Life Stress on Reward Processing > 6. Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Boecker et al., 2014 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As posited in the introduction, ELS likely alters core aspects of affect and cognition that in turns makes individuals susceptible to psychopathology.”
§ The Effects of Early Life Stress on Reward Processing > 6. Discussion
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Dillon et al. (2009) and Boeker et al. (2014) found increased reaction times in individuals with prior ELS in the monetary incentive delay task, while decreased reaction times were noted in children with reactive attachment disorder in a gambling task (Takiguchi et al., 2015), although the remainder of studies either did not measure behavior (Casement et al., 2015, 2014; Goff et al., 2013; Hanson”
§ The Effects of Early Life Stress on Reward Processing > 5. Human Neuroimaging Studies (Table 2)
What the sources say
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While it does appear that decreased striatal responsiveness in humans is linked to anhedonia and depressive symptoms, studies measuring how this impacts actual behavior are lacking.”
§ The Effects of Early Life Stress on Reward Processing > 5. Human Neuroimaging Studies (Table 2)
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“To our knowledge, interventions meant to target subclinical anhedonia or impairments in reinforcement learning in at risk populations have yet to be tested, however there is evidence for potential efficacy.”
§ The Effects of Early Life Stress on Reward Processing > 6. Discussion
What the sources say
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“in many of the human studies reviewed, decreased activation in regions of the basal ganglia to the anticipation or receipt of reward was not only associated with depressive symptoms (Dillon et al., 2009; Goff et al., 2013), but often found to mediate the relationship between ELS and depression (Corral-Frías et al., 2015; Hanson et al., 2015).”
§ The Effects of Early Life Stress on Reward Processing > 6. Discussion
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The monetary incentive delay task and the reward guessing task, while well adapted for use with imaging, are less suited to capturing differences in reward behavior.”
§ The Effects of Early Life Stress on Reward Processing > 5. Human Neuroimaging Studies (Table 2)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“It should be noted that in various studies utilizing fMRI and the monetary incentive delay task, changes in ventral striatal activation are often found in the absence of changes in reaction time (Jansma et al., 2013; Saji et al., 2013; Smoski et al., 2011), suggesting that reaction time may lack sensitivity as a marker for reward processing.”
§ The Effects of Early Life Stress on Reward Processing > 5. Human Neuroimaging Studies (Table 2)
What the sources say
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“When individuals who have completed behavioral activation therapy are challenged with a monetary incentive delay task, they demonstrate increased activation of the ventromedial PFC during anticipation of a loss, which is interpreted as allowing for ongoing engagement in rewarding activity despite negative emotions (Mori et al., 2016).”
§ The Effects of Early Life Stress on Reward Processing > 6. Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Mori et al., 2016 source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Overall, a limited literature in humans does suggest that ELS is associated with decreased neural responsiveness to reward on both measures of approach motivation and reward responsiveness, although studies evaluating decreased maternal warmth appear to be an exception.”
§ The Effects of Early Life Stress on Reward Processing > 5. Human Neuroimaging Studies (Table 2)
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
Animal models of early life stress (maternal separation, post-weaning social isolation) are valid analogues for human early life stress (e.g., institutionalization, maltreatment) in reward processing research.
“Interestingly, this is similar to the developmental pattern that is seen in the animal literature, with maternal separation more likely to result in deficits in approach motivation and responsiveness to reward compared to post-weaning social isolation.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The developmental timing of stressors in animal models corresponds to human developmental periods (e.g., maternal separation to early childhood, social isolation to periadolescence).
“Despite limitations in the available human and animal literature, decreased indices of approach motivation and responsiveness to reward appear to be more common when the stressor is experienced earlier in life (i.e., maternal separation in animals, or early institutionalization in humans).”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Complete social isolation in adolescent rodents evokes widespread structural and functional changes in the brain, most prominently in neuromodulatory dopamine and serotonin systems and particularly within cortical and striatal targets.33, 36, 37”
From The effects of social deprivation on adolescent development and mental health (2020) · cites this paper as [36]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Thus, complete social deprivation during rodent adolescence affects brain development, mainly affecting motivation and reward processes.33, 36”
From The effects of social deprivation on adolescent development and mental health (2020) · cites this paper as [36]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In most of these studies, animals were isolated from peers from around postnatal days 21 to 43, corresponding roughly to early adolescence (aged 10–13 years) and mid adolescence (aged 14–16 years) in humans.34 Such studies show similar effects to those investigating isolation throughout the whole adolescent period, including increased anxiety-like behaviours, depression-like behaviours, and reward”
From The effects of social deprivation on adolescent development and mental health (2020) · cites this paper as [36]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Importantly, these effects are specific to isolation during rodent adolescence and do not occur to a similar extent when isolation occurs before or after adolescence.33, 36”
From The effects of social deprivation on adolescent development and mental health (2020) · cites this paper as [36]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“More specifically, although some divergent effects have been observed, the most consistent findings report that dopamine release in reward regions such as the nucleus accumbens increases following adolescent isolation, but dopamine activity in the prefrontal cortex decreases.33, 36, 37”
From The effects of social deprivation on adolescent development and mental health (2020) · cites this paper as [36]
In the citing paper
“Based on observed deficits in the ventral striatum, reward responsiveness and processing may be a primary mediator of the effects of ELA [192].”
From Food Addiction and Psychosocial Adversity: Biological Embedding, Contextual Factors, and Public Health Implications (2020) · cites this paper as [192]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ The Effects of Early Life Stress on Reward Processing > 4. ELS and Reward Processing: Preclinical Data
“Harry Harlow (Harlow, 1958)”
§ The Effects of Early Life Stress on Reward Processing > References
“70. Harlow HF 1959 Love in infant monkeys Sci Am 200 68 74 13658993”
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Takiguchi, S., Fujisawa, T. X., Mizushima, S., Saito, D. N., Okamoto, Y., Shimada, K., Koizumi, M., Kumazaki, H., Jung, M., Kosaka, H., et al. (2015) · BJPsych Open · doi:10.1192/bjpo.bp.115.001586 · Cited by 63 · cited 2×
“Similarly, individuals with a history of reactive attachment disorder and early life maltreatment demonstrated reduced activation of caudate and nucleus accumbens during the reward guessing task (delivery versus anticipation was not differentiated) (Takiguchi et al., 2015).”
BackgroundRetractedInfluence of life stress on depression: moderation by a polymorphism in the 5-HTT gene
Caspi, A., Sugden, K., Moffitt, T. E., Taylor, A., Craig, I. W., Harrington, H., McClay, J., Mill, J., Martin, J., Braithwaite, A., et al. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1083968 · Cited by 8,120 · cited 1×
“, 2008), as well as genetic and epigenetic risk and protective factors (Caspi et al., 2003; Palma-Gudiel and Fañanás, 2016).”
BackgroundEpigenetic programming by maternal behavior
Weaver, I. C. G., Cervoni, N., Champagne, F. A., D'Alessio, A. C., Sharma, S., Seckl, J. R., Dymov, S., Szyf, M., & Meaney, M. J. (2004) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1276 · Cited by 6,177 · cited 1×
“Subsequent work revealed that such changes occurred via an epigenetic mechanism in which maternal care altered levels of gene methylation (Weaver et al., 2004).”
BackgroundWhat is the role of dopamine in reward: hedonic impact, reward learning, or incentive salience?
Berridge, K. C., & Robinson, T. E. (1998) · Brain Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0165-0173(98)00019-8 · Cited by 4,127
The open field as a paradigm to measure the effects of drugs on anxiety-like behaviors: a review.
Prut, L., & Belzung, C. (2003) · European Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/s0014-2999(03)01272-x · Cited by 3,190
Liu, D., Diorio, J., Tannenbaum, B., Caldji, C., Francis, D., Freedman, A., Sharma, S., Pearson, D., Plotsky, P. M., & Meaney, M. J. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.277.5332.1659 · Cited by 3,170 · cited 3×
“, 2000), increased glucocorticoid receptor (GR) mRNA, decreased hypothalamic CRF mRNA (Liu et al., 1997), and increased benzodiazepine receptor binding in brain regions regulating emotion (Caldji et al.”
BackgroundInfluentialVarese, F., Smeets, F., Drukker, M., Lieverse, R., Lataster, T., Viechtbauer, W., Read, J., van Os, J., & Bentall, R. P. (2012) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbs050 · Cited by 2,436
Semple, B. D., Blomgren, K., Gimlin, K., Ferriero, D. M., & Noble-Haeusslein, L. J. (2013) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2013.04.001 · Cited by 2,132 · cited 2×
“However, development of the human brain is protracted compared to other species (Clancy et al., 2001; Miller et al, 2012; Semple et al., 2013), so despite having a more “mature” brain at birth compared to rats, vulnerability to insult remains.”
BackgroundHeim, C. (2000) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.284.5.592 · Cited by 1,968
Chronic stress, drug use, and vulnerability to addiction
Sinha, R. (2008) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1196/annals.1441.030 · Cited by 1,904 · cited 1×
“This is an important concept in the field of addiction (Burke and Miczek, 2014b; George et al., 2012; Sinha, 2008), that is hypothesized to mediate the relationship between ELS and increased risk of substance use disorders (Andersen and Teicher, 2009).”
BackgroundBerridge, K. C., & Robinson, T. E. (2003) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/s0166-2236(03)00233-9 · Cited by 1,869
FMRI visualization of brain activity during a monetary incentive delay task
Knutson, B., Westdorp, A., Kaiser, E., & Hommer, D. (2000) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.2000.0593 · Cited by 1,414 · cited 1×
“By measuring brain activity during the anticipation and delivery phases, a motivational component and a reward responsiveness component can be inferred, respectively (Knutson et al., 2000; Lutz and Widmer, 2014; Wang et al., 2016).”
BackgroundSpitz, R. A., & Wolf, K. M. (1946) · The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child · doi:10.1080/00797308.1946.11823551 · Cited by 1,365
Galvan, A., Hare, T. A., Parra, C. E., Penn, J., Voss, H., Glover, G., & Casey, B. J. (2006) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1062-06.2006 · Cited by 1,282 · cited 1×
“Normative development of the brain regions involved in reward processing demonstrates structural and functional changes from childhood to adulthood, with maturation of PFC regions typically delayed compared to that of subcortical regions (Galvan et al., 2006; Mills et al., 2014; Somerville et al., 2011).”
BackgroundConditioned place preference: what does it add to our preclinical understanding of drug reward?
Bardo, M. T., & Bevins, R. A. (2000) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s002130000569 · Cited by 1,274 · cited 1×
“The conditioned place preference task is thought to measure incentive motivation to seek out cues previously associated with reward (Bardo and Bevins, 2000).”
BackgroundTranslating developmental time across mammalian species
Clancy, B., Darlington, R. B., & Finlay, B. L. (2001) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/s0306-4522(01)00171-3 · Cited by 1,221 · cited 2×
“However, development of the human brain is protracted compared to other species (Clancy et al., 2001; Miller et al, 2012; Semple et al., 2013), so despite having a more “mature” brain at birth compared to rats, vulnerability to insult remains.”
BackgroundMaternal care, hippocampal synaptogenesis and cognitive development in rats
Liu, D., Diorio, J., Day, J. C., Francis, D. D., & Meaney, M. J. (2000) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/77702 · Cited by 1,195
Frontal cortex and reward-guided learning and decision-making
Rushworth, M. F. S., Noonan, M. P., Boorman, E. D., Walton, M. E., & Behrens, T. E. (2011) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.05.014 · Cited by 1,111
SÁNCHEZ, M. M., LADD, C. O., & PLOTSKY, P. M. (2001) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s0954579401003029 · Cited by 1,003 · cited 1×
“Similar to rats exposed to low levels of maternal care, maternal separation results in a greater peak and duration of glucocorticoid release in response to stress, decreased GR expression, increased CRF expression, and reduced benzodiazepine receptor binding (Sánchez et al., 2001).”
BackgroundHeim, C., & Binder, E. B. (2012) · Experimental Neurology · doi:10.1016/j.expneurol.2011.10.032 · Cited by 986
Fone, K. C. F., & Porkess, M. V. (2008) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.03.003 · Cited by 864
Salamone, J. D., & Correa, M. (2002) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0166-4328(02)00282-6 · Cited by 817
Carr, C. P., Martins, C. M. S., Stingel, A. M., Lemgruber, V. B., & Juruena, M. F. (2013) · Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease · doi:10.1097/nmd.0000000000000049 · Cited by 802 · cited 1×
“The particular psychopathological trajectory might depend on the type of ELS (Carr et al., 2013) and the developmental window in which the stress was experienced (Andersen et al.”
BackgroundAndersen, S. L., Tomada, A., Vincow, E. S., Valente, E., Polcari, A., & Teicher, M. H. (2008) · The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences · doi:10.1176/jnp.2008.20.3.292 · Cited by 788 · cited 2×
“, 2013) and the developmental window in which the stress was experienced (Andersen et al., 2008), as well as genetic and epigenetic risk and protective factors (Caspi et al.”
BackgroundWyvell, C. L., & Berridge, K. C. (2000) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.20-21-08122.2000 · Cited by 764
Treadway, M. T., Bossaller, N. A., Shelton, R. C., & Zald, D. H. (2012) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0028813 · Cited by 733 · cited 1×
“, 1998), but are less likely to engage in tasks requiring higher amounts of effort (Treadway et al., 2012).”
BackgroundLong-term behavioral and neuroendocrine adaptations to adverse early experience
Ladd, C. O., Huot, R. L., Thrivikraman, K. V., Nemeroff, C. B., Meaney, M. J., & Plotsky, P. M. (2000) · Progress in brain research · doi:10.1016/s0079-6123(08)62132-9 · Cited by 726 · cited 1×
“Given that maternal separation deprives rat pups from opportunities for maternal care, this paradigm would be expected to result in changes opposite to that seen in rats exposed to high levels of maternal care, and this does appear to be the case (Ladd et al., 2000).”
BackgroundProlonged myelination in human neocortical evolution
Miller, D. J., Duka, T., Stimpson, C. D., Schapiro, S. J., Baze, W. B., McArthur, M. J., Fobbs, A. J., Sousa, A. M. M., Šestan, N., Wildman, D. E., et al. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1117943109 · Cited by 699
Peciña, S., & Berridge, K. C. (2005) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2329-05.2005 · Cited by 671 · cited 1×
“Responsiveness to reward also involves the nucleus accumbens (in addition to other regions, such as the ventral pallidum), but opioids and endocannabinoids are the major neurochemical mediators of reward responsiveness (Mahler et al., 2007; Peciña and Berridge, 2005).”
BackgroundInfantile Experience and Resistance to Physiological Stress
Levine, S. (1957) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.126.3270.405 · Cited by 659 · cited 3×
“…Processing: Preclinical Data Early animal studies on developmental adversity, such as those by Harry Harlow (Harlow, 1958) and Seymour Levine (Levine, 1957), emerged in the 1950s, inspired both by early psychoanalytic theories and by the deprivations of civilian populations during World War…”
BackgroundInfluentialCorticotropin-releasing factor activates noradrenergic neurons of the locus coeruleus
Valentino, R. J., Foote, S. L., & Aston‐Jones, G. (1983) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0006-8993(83)90615-7 · Cited by 603 · cited 1×
“CRF, besides inducing the release of ACTH, also acts within the brain to enhance sympathetic arousal (Dunn and Swiergiel, 2008; Valentino et al., 1983).”
BackgroundCaldji, C., Francis, D., Sharma, S., Plotsky, P., & Meaney, M. (2000) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1016/s0893-133x(99)00110-4 · Cited by 600
Research Review: The neurobiology and genetics of maltreatment and adversity
McCrory, E., De Brito, S. A., & Viding, E. (2010) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02271.x · Cited by 598
Dopamine reward prediction error coding
Schultz, W. (2016) · Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience · doi:10.31887/dcns.2016.18.1/wschultz · Cited by 597 · cited 2×
“actual reward outcome, allows for dynamic learning from experience and updates in reward expectations (Gradin et al., 2011; Schultz, 2016).”
BackgroundVariations in maternal care in infancy regulate the development of stress reactivity
Caldji, C., Diorio, J. C., & Meaney, M. J. (2000) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s0006-3223(00)01084-2 · Cited by 588
Assessing anhedonia in depression: potentials and pitfalls
Rizvi, S. J., Pizzagalli, D. A., Sproule, B. A., & Kennedy, S. H. (2016) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.03.004 · Cited by 571 · cited 3×
“Reward processing encompasses the response to rewarding stimuli, the ability to learn from reward, the anticipation of future rewards, and engagement in goal-directed behavior towards rewards (Berridge and Robinson, 2003; Rizvi et al., 2016).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialFlagel, S. B., Akil, H., & Robinson, T. E. (2009) · Neuropharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2008.06.027 · Cited by 561 · cited 1×
“…for the animal, conditioned place preference can be conceptualized as probing the “reward valuation” subconstruct within approach motivation, but expectancy is arguably also involved, given the presence of Pavlovian conditioned approach behavior (Flagel et al., 2009; NIMH Research Domain Criteria).”
BackgroundHyperdopaminergic mutant mice have higher "wanting" but not "liking" for sweet rewards
Peciña, S., Cagniard, B., Berridge, K. C., Aldridge, J. W., & Zhuang, X. (2003) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.23-28-09395.2003 · Cited by 551 · cited 1×
“In addition, dopamine from the nucleus accumbens is important for the ability of rewarding cues to gain incentive salience and elicit instrumental behavior (Peciña et al., 2003; Wyvell and Berridge, 2000).”
BackgroundPanksepp, J. (1981) · Developmental Psychobiology · doi:10.1002/dev.420140405 · Cited by 537 · cited 2×
“…while the majority of studies started isolation around postnatal day (PND) 21, McCool and Chappell (2009) started isolation when rats were between PND 28 and PND 32, thus allowing the rats to have experience with peers during a longer duration within their peak play period (Panksepp, 1981).”
BackgroundFrontostriatal maturation predicts cognitive control failure to appetitive cues in adolescents
Somerville, L. H., Hare, T., & Casey, B. J. (2011) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2010.21572 · Cited by 523 · cited 1×
“Normative development of the brain regions involved in reward processing demonstrates structural and functional changes from childhood to adulthood, with maturation of PFC regions typically delayed compared to that of subcortical regions (Galvan et al., 2006; Mills et al., 2014; Somerville et al., 2011).”
BackgroundEffect of social isolation on stress-related behavioural and neuroendocrine state in the rat
Weiss, I. C., Pryce, C. R., Jongen-Rêlo, A. L., Nanz-Bahr, N. I., & Feldon, J. (2004) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2003.10.015 · Cited by 512 · cited 2×
“1 Neurobiology of Social Isolation: As with maternal separation, post-weaning social isolation results in enhanced sensitivity of the HPA axis, especially in male rats (Holson et al., 1991; Viveros et al., 1988; Weiss et al., 2004), as well as an overall anxiogenic phenotype.”
BackgroundInfluentialExpected value and prediction error abnormalities in depression and schizophrenia
Gradin, V. B., Kumar, P., Waiter, G., Ahearn, T., Stickle, C., Milders, M., Reid, I., Hall, J., & Steele, J. D. (2011) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awr059 · Cited by 485 · cited 1×
“actual reward outcome, allows for dynamic learning from experience and updates in reward expectations (Gradin et al., 2011; Schultz, 2016).”
BackgroundLiu, Caldji, Sharma, Plotsky, & Meaney (2000) · Journal of Neuroendocrinology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2826.2000.00422.x · Cited by 456 · cited 2×
“Further evidence of stress sensitivity is indicated by a decrease in alpha-2 adrenergic autoreceptor binding in the locus coeruleus, which promotes enhanced noradrenergic activity in response to stress (Liu et al., 2000; Swinny et al., 2010).”
BackgroundLong-term Biobehavioral Effects of Maternal Separation in the Rat: Consistent or Confusing?
Lehmann, J., & Feldon, J. (2000) · Reviews in the Neurosciences · doi:10.1515/revneuro.2000.11.4.383 · Cited by 443 · cited 1×
“One difficulty in characterizing the maternal separation literature is the wide variety of separation methods, control groups, and statistical methods that have been utilized (Lehmann and Feldon, 2000; Tractenberg et al., 2016).”
MethodThe developmental mismatch in structural brain maturation during adolescence
Mills, K. L., Goddings, A.-L., Clasen, L. S., Giedd, J. N., & Blakemore, S.-J. (2014) · Developmental Neuroscience · doi:10.1159/000362328 · Cited by 440 · cited 1×
“Normative development of the brain regions involved in reward processing demonstrates structural and functional changes from childhood to adulthood, with maturation of PFC regions typically delayed compared to that of subcortical regions (Galvan et al., 2006; Mills et al., 2014; Somerville et al., 2011).”
BackgroundPryce, C. R., Rüedi‐Bettschen, D., Dettling, A. C., Weston, A. A., Russig, H., Ferger, B., & Feldon, J. (2005) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2005.03.011 · Cited by 430 · cited 2×
“2 Social Isolation—While pre-weaning maternal separation is often conceptualized as early life neglect and results in a depressive-like phenotype (Pryce et al., 2005), postweaning social isolation during the juvenile and adolescent period produces sensory processing deficits and increases in fear and anxiety-like beha…”
BackgroundHeidbreder, C. A., Weiss, I. C., Domeney, A. M., Pryce, C., Homberg, J., Hedou, G., Feldon, J., Moran, M. C., & Nelson, P. (2000) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/s0306-4522(00)00336-5 · Cited by 404 · cited 2×
“, 2010), and increased dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens in response to psychostimulants (Hall et al., 1998b; Heidbreder et al., 2000; Yorgason et al., 2016, 2013).”
BackgroundMcCrory, E. J., Gerin, M. I., & Viding, E. (2017) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/jcpp.12713 · Cited by 402 · cited 1×
“While there is a literature on automatic emotional processing in ELS, many of these studies focus on threat processing and amygdala activity rather than reward (McCrory et al., 2017).”
BackgroundHarlow, H. F. (1959) · Scientific American · doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0659-68 · Cited by 391
Neural development, cell-cell signaling, and the “two-hit” hypothesis of schizophrenia
Maynard, T. M., Sikich, L., Lieberman, J. A., & LaMantia, A.-S. (2001) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a006887 · Cited by 383 · cited 1×
“maternal separation, confers vulnerability to symptoms of psychiatric illness, but with symptom onset only occurring after exposure to a subsequent stressor (Bayer et al., 1999; Maynard et al., 2001).”
BackgroundMahler, S. V., Smith, K. S., & Berridge, K. C. (2007) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/sj.npp.1301376 · Cited by 377 · cited 1×
“Responsiveness to reward also involves the nucleus accumbens (in addition to other regions, such as the ventral pallidum), but opioids and endocannabinoids are the major neurochemical mediators of reward responsiveness (Mahler et al., 2007; Peciña and Berridge, 2005).”
BackgroundDillon, D. G., Holmes, A. J., Birk, J. L., Brooks, N., Lyons-Ruth, K., & Pizzagalli, D. A. (2009) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.02.019 · Cited by 370 · cited 2×
“Using the monetary incentive delay task, four studies demonstrated decreased activity in regions of basal ganglia during the anticipation phase, suggesting reduced approach motivation in individuals who were exposed to institutionalization or early life adversity prior to adolescence (Boecker et al., 2014; Boecker-Sch…”
ResultBayer, T. A., Falkai, P., & Maier, W. (1999) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/s0022-3956(99)00039-4 · Cited by 346 · cited 1×
“maternal separation, confers vulnerability to symptoms of psychiatric illness, but with symptom onset only occurring after exposure to a subsequent stressor (Bayer et al., 1999; Maynard et al., 2001).”
BackgroundPiazza, P. V., Rougé-Pont, F., Deroche, V, Maccari, S., Simon, H., & Le Moal, M. (1996) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.93.16.8716 · Cited by 346 · cited 1×
“Postnatally, CRF and glucocorticoids can potentiate dopamine release (Bagosi et al., 2006; Kalivas et al., 1987; Piazza et al., 1996).”
BackgroundDysfunctional reward processing in depression
Admon, R., & Pizzagalli, D. A. (2015) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2014.12.011 · Cited by 343
Brake, W. G., Zhang, T. Y., Diorio, J., Meaney, M. J., & Gratton, A. (2004) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2004.03286.x · Cited by 342 · cited 3×
“, 1999), as well as increased locomotion in response to cocaine (Brake et al., 2004).”
BackgroundHanson, J. L., Hariri, A. R., & Williamson, D. E. (2015) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.05.010 · Cited by 338 · cited 1×
“, 2013), but often found to mediate the relationship between ELS and depression (Corral-Frías et al., 2015; Hanson et al., 2015).”
BackgroundAndersen, S. L., & Teicher, M. H. (2009) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.09.009 · Cited by 326
Meaney, M. J., Brake, W., & Gratton, A. (2002) · Psychoneuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/s0306-4530(01)00040-3 · Cited by 325 · cited 1×
“The enhanced sensitivity to psychostimulants found in the latter studies might be due to decreases in dopamine transporter levels within the nucleus accumbens of maternally separated rats, limiting dopamine clearance (Brake et al., 2004; Meaney et al., 2002; Zhu et al., 2010).”
BackgroundRubia, K., Smith, A. B., Halari, R., Matsukura, F., Mohammad, M., Taylor, E., & Brammer, M. J. (2009) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.08020212 · Cited by 322
Borderline personality disorder and childhood trauma: Evidence for a causal relationship
Ball, J. S., & Links, P. S. (2009) · Current Psychiatry Reports · doi:10.1007/s11920-009-0010-4 · Cited by 320
Uchida, S., Hara, K., Kobayashi, A., Funato, H., Hobara, T., Otsuki, K., Yamagata, H., McEwen, B. S., & Watanabe, Y. (2010) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1436-10.2010 · Cited by 310 · cited 2×
“, 2015) or no change in sucrose preference (Matthews et al., 1996a; Mrdalj et al., 2016; Øines et al., 2012; Rüedi-Bettschen et al., 2005; Shalev and Kafkafi, 2002; Uchida et al., 2010), while others have reported increases in sucrose preference (Ferreira et al.”
BackgroundThe basolateral amygdala in reward learning and addiction
Wassum, K. M., & Izquierdo, A. (2015) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.08.017 · Cited by 306 · cited 10×
“Taken together, connections between midbrain dopamine cells, the basal ganglia (including structures within ventral striatum, such as the nucleus accumbens) and the PFC, with input from other structures, including the amygdala, thus form a reward circuit.”
BackgroundInfluentialMcCrory, E. J., & Viding, E. (2015) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s0954579415000115 · Cited by 295 · cited 2×
“Accordingly, identifying at-risk individuals and tailoring interventions to target the reward processing system could represent an effective strategy to prevent later psychopathology (McCrory and Viding, 2015).”
BackgroundWhat's conditioned in conditioned place preference?
Huston, J. P., Silva, M. A. D. S., Topic, B., & Müller, C. P. (2013) · Trends in Pharmacological Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tips.2013.01.004 · Cited by 287 · cited 1×
“While both of these tasks are thought to assess primarily the approach motivation components of reward processing, it should be noted that an element of reward learning is also required, particularly for conditioned place preference (Huston et al., 2013).”
BackgroundEffect of childhood emotional abuse and age on cortisol responsivity in adulthood
Carpenter, L. L., Tyrka, A. R., Ross, N. S., Khoury, L., Anderson, G. M., & Price, L. H. (2009) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.02.030 · Cited by 281 · cited 1×
“Early life stress has been found to both exaggerate and attenuate the activity of the HPA axis in response to stress, both phenomena which have been linked to psychopathology (Carpenter et al., 2009; Heim C et al., 2000; Tyrka et al., 2008).”
BackgroundSelf-citationSchneider, M. L., Roughton, E. C., Koehler, A. J., & Lubach, G. R. (1999) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00020 · Cited by 267 · cited 1×
“Given that brain regions undergoing the most extensive maturation are thought to be the most vulnerable to insult (Schneider et al., 1999), we might expect differing effects of ELS based on developmental timing.”
BackgroundTractenberg, S. G., Levandowski, M. L., de Azeredo, L. A., Orso, R., Roithmann, L. G., Hoffmann, E. S., Brenhouse, H., & Grassi-Oliveira, R. (2016) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.06.021 · Cited by 267 · cited 1×
“One difficulty in characterizing the maternal separation literature is the wide variety of separation methods, control groups, and statistical methods that have been utilized (Lehmann and Feldon, 2000; Tractenberg et al., 2016).”
MethodIsolation rearing in rats: pre- and postsynaptic changes in striatal dopaminergic systems
Hall, F. S., Wilkinson, L. S., Humby, T., Inglis, W., Kendall, D. A., Marsden, C. A., & Robbins, T. W. (1998) · Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0091-3057(97)00510-8 · Cited by 261
Mehta, M. A., Gore-Langton, E., Golembo, N., Colvert, E., Williams, S. C. R., & Sonuga-Barke, E. (2010) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21394 · Cited by 258 · cited 2×
“Using the monetary incentive delay task, four studies demonstrated decreased activity in regions of basal ganglia during the anticipation phase, suggesting reduced approach motivation in individuals who were exposed to institutionalization or early life adversity prior to adolescence (Boecker et al., 2014; Boecker-Sch…”
BackgroundChildhood parental loss and adult hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal function
Tyrka, A. R., Wier, L., Price, L. H., Ross, N., Anderson, G. M., Wilkinson, C. W., & Carpenter, L. L. (2008) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.01.011 · Cited by 250 · cited 1×
“Early life stress has been found to both exaggerate and attenuate the activity of the HPA axis in response to stress, both phenomena which have been linked to psychopathology (Carpenter et al., 2009; Heim C et al., 2000; Tyrka et al., 2008).”
BackgroundSelf-citationNelson, B. D., Perlman, G., Klein, D. N., Kotov, R., & Hajcak, G. (2016) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2016.15121524 · Cited by 250 · cited 6×
“For example, women with a history of both childhood sexual abuse and MDD (Pechtel and Pizzagalli, 2013), adolescents exposed to physical abuse (Hanson et al., 2017), and young adults who had high levels of various adversities in early life (Birn et al., 2017) demonstrate decreased reinforcement learning.”
BackgroundInfluentialMatthews, K., & Robbins, T. W. (2003) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0149-7634(03)00008-3 · Cited by 237
Lukkes, J. L. (2009) · Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/neuro.08.018.2009 · Cited by 235 · cited 2×
“By depriving animals of the play experiences that normally guide cortical development, post-weaning social isolation is conceptualized as a rodent model of adolescent adversity with long-lasting effects on neurobiology and behavior (Fone and Porkess, 2008; Lukkes et al., 2009; Robbins, 2016).”
BackgroundReduced nucleus accumbens reactivity and adolescent depression following early-life stress
Goff, B., Gee, D. G., Telzer, E. H., Humphreys, K. L., Gabard-Durnam, L., Flannery, J., & Tottenham, N. (2013) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.12.010 · Cited by 234 · cited 3×
“In support of this idea, in many of the human studies reviewed, decreased activation in regions of the basal ganglia to the anticipation or receipt of reward was not only associated with depressive symptoms (Dillon et al., 2009; Goff et al., 2013), but often found to mediate the relationship between ELS and depression…”
BackgroundResultJones, G. H., Marsden, C. A., & Robbins, T. W. (1990) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/bf02244105 · Cited by 232 · cited 1×
“, 1997), as well as greater conditioned responses to sucrose-related stimuli (Jones et al., 1990).”
BackgroundHarold, G. T., Leve, L. D., Barrett, D., Elam, K., Neiderhiser, J. M., Natsuaki, M. N., Shaw, D. S., Reiss, D., & Thapar, A. (2013) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/jcpp.12100 · Cited by 230 · cited 7×
“, 2005), substance use (Andersen and Teicher, 2008), personality disorders (Ball and Links, 2009), attention-deficit/ hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) (Harold et al., 2013), and psychotic disorders (Varese et al.”
BackgroundInfluentialBolton, J. L., Molet, J., Regev, L., Chen, Y., Rismanchi, N., Haddad, E., Yang, D. Z., Obenaus, A., & Baram, T. Z. (2017) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2017.08.023 · Cited by 222
Leussis, M. P., & Andersen, S. L. (2008) · Synapse · doi:10.1002/syn.20462 · Cited by 220
Garfield, J. B. B., Lubman, D. I., & Yücel, M. (2014) · Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/0004867413508455 · Cited by 213 · cited 2×
“, 2016), substance use disorder (CastellanosRyan et al., 2011; Garfield et al., 2014), and conduct disorder (Rubia et al.”
BackgroundStress and CRF gate neural activation of BDNF in the mesolimbic reward pathway
Walsh, J. J., Friedman, A. K., Sun, H., Heller, E. A., Ku, S. M., Juarez, B., Burnham, V. L., Mazei-Robison, M. S., Ferguson, D., Golden, S. A., et al. (2014) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3591 · Cited by 210 · cited 1×
“…relevant to reward processing, as receptors for CRF and glucocorticoids are located throughout the reward circuitry of the brain, with their activation or blockade affecting reward-sensitive neurotransmission and behaviors (Bryce and Floresco, 2016; Craenenbroeck et al., 2005; Walsh et al., 2014).”
BackgroundStress in adolescence and drugs of abuse in rodent models: role of dopamine, CRF, and HPA axis
Burke, A. R., & Miczek, K. A. (2014) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00213-013-3369-1 · Cited by 207 · cited 2×
“This is an important concept in the field of addiction (Burke and Miczek, 2014b; George et al., 2012; Sinha, 2008), that is hypothesized to mediate the relationship between ELS and increased risk of substance use disorders (Andersen and Teicher, 2009).”
BackgroundWillner, P., Moreau, J.-L., Kurre Nielsen, C., Papp, M., & Sluzewska, A. (1996) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/0031-9384(95)02256-2 · Cited by 205 · cited 1×
“One of the most common uses of the sucrose preference test is to assess stress-induced anhedonia in animal models of depression, where reduced consumption of sucrose is considered indicative of depressive-like behavior (Willner et al., 1996).”
BackgroundBehavioral effects of chronic adolescent stress are sustained and sexually dimorphic
Bourke, C. H., & Neigh, G. N. (2011) · Hormones and Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2011.03.011 · Cited by 201
Age‐dependent effects of chronic stress on brain plasticity and depressive behavior
Tóth, E., Gersner, R., Wilf‐Yarkoni, A., Raizel, H., Dar, D. E., Richter‐Levin, G., Levit, O., & Zangen, A. (2008) · Journal of Neurochemistry · doi:10.1111/j.1471-4159.2008.05642.x · Cited by 198 · cited 1×
“, 2007) while male animals do not (Bourke and Neigh, 2011; Novick et al., 2013; Pohl et al., 2007; Toth et al., 2008).”
BackgroundEarly childhood stress exposure, reward pathways, and adult decision making
Birn, R. M., Roeber, B. J., & Pollak, S. D. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1708791114 · Cited by 197 · cited 1×
“, 2017), and young adults who had high levels of various adversities in early life (Birn et al., 2017) demonstrate decreased reinforcement learning.”
BackgroundCumulative stress in childhood is associated with blunted reward-related brain activity in adulthood
Hanson, J. L., Albert, D., Iselin, A.-M. R., Carré, J. M., Dodge, K. A., & Hariri, A. R. (2016) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsv124 · Cited by 185 · cited 1×
“This relationship was significant when the stress was experienced earlier in life (kindergarten through grade 3) but not later (Hanson et al., 2016).”
BackgroundAllostasis and addiction: role of the dopamine and corticotropin-releasing factor systems
George, O., Le Moal, M., & Koob, G. F. (2012) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.11.004 · Cited by 184 · cited 1×
“This is an important concept in the field of addiction (Burke and Miczek, 2014b; George et al., 2012; Sinha, 2008), that is hypothesized to mediate the relationship between ELS and increased risk of substance use disorders (Andersen and Teicher, 2009).”
BackgroundEarly adversity and the prospective prediction of depressive and anxiety disorders in adolescents
Phillips, N. K., Hammen, C. L., Brennan, P. A., Najman, J. M., & Bor, W. (2005) · Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10802-005-0930-3 · Cited by 184 · cited 1×
“ELS is associated with illnesses across the diagnostic spectrum, including major depressive disorder (MDD) (Heim and Binder, 2012), anxiety (Phillips et al., 2005), substance use (Andersen and Teicher, 2008), personality disorders (Ball and Links, 2009), attention-deficit/ hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) (Harold et al.”
BackgroundThe Influence of Gene–Environment Interactions on the Development of Alcoholism and Drug Dependence
Enoch, M. (2012) · Current Psychiatry Reports · doi:10.1007/s11920-011-0252-9 · Cited by 183 · cited 1×
“Given that the topic of ELS and addiction is reviewed extensively elsewhere (Andersen and Teicher, 2009; Burke and Miczek, 2014; Delavari et al., 2016; Enoch, 2012), we restricted our review to studies that dealt with non-drug reward (food, social interaction, money, positive feedback).”
BackgroundA non-reward attractor theory of depression
Rolls, E. T. (2016) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.05.007 · Cited by 180
Matthews, K., Wilkinson, L. S., & Robbins, T. W. (1996) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/0031-9384(95)02069-1 · Cited by 179
Kundaković, M., Lim, S. C., Gudsnuk, K. M., & Champagne, F. A. (2013) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2013.00078 · Cited by 179
Berlin, I., Givry-Steiner, L., Lecrubier, Y., & Puech, A. (1998) · European Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s0924-9338(98)80048-5 · Cited by 178 · cited 1×
“For example, individuals with MDD have similar hedonic responses to sweet solutions compared to controls (Berlin et al., 1998), but are less likely to engage in tasks requiring higher amounts of effort (Treadway et al.”
BackgroundEarly life stress impairs fear conditioning in adult male and female rats
Kosten, T. A., Lee, H. J., & Kim, J. J. (2006) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2006.03.009 · Cited by 175
Impact of early adversity on glucocorticoid regulation and later mental disorders
Strüber, N., Strüber, D., & Roth, G. (2014) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.10.015 · Cited by 173 · cited 1×
“, 2006; Pechtel and Pizzagalli, 2013) From a neurobiological perspective, perhaps one of the most well-known effects of ELS is alteration of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis (for reviews, see McCrory et al., 2010; Strüber et al., 2014; Tyrka et al., 2013).”
BackgroundManiam, J., & Morris, M. J. (2009) · Psychoneuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2009.10.013 · Cited by 173
Basolateral amygdala to orbitofrontal cortex projections enable cue-triggered reward expectations
Lichtenberg, N. T., Pennington, Z. T., Holley, S. M., Greenfield, V. Y., Cepeda, C., Levine, M. S., & Wassum, K. M. (2017) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0486-17.2017 · Cited by 171 · cited 10×
“Taken together, connections between midbrain dopamine cells, the basal ganglia (including structures within ventral striatum, such as the nucleus accumbens) and the PFC, with input from other structures, including the amygdala, thus form a reward circuit.”
BackgroundInfluentialTarazi, F. I., Tomasini, E. C., & Baldessarini, R. (1999) · Developmental Neuroscience · doi:10.1159/000017365 · Cited by 169 · cited 1×
“For example, animal models show protracted pruning of dopamine receptors in the PFC compared to the striatum and accumbens (Andersen et al., 2000; Tarazi et al., 1999).”
Background“Isolation stress” revisited: isolation-rearing effects depend on animal care methods
Holson, R. R., Scallet, A. C., Ali, S. F., & Turner, B. B. (1991) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/0031-9384(91)90338-o · Cited by 166 · cited 1×
“1 Neurobiology of Social Isolation: As with maternal separation, post-weaning social isolation results in enhanced sensitivity of the HPA axis, especially in male rats (Holson et al., 1991; Viveros et al., 1988; Weiss et al., 2004), as well as an overall anxiogenic phenotype.”
BackgroundIsolation changes the incentive value of sucrose and social behaviour in juvenile and adult rats
Van den Berg, C. (1999) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0166-4328(99)00099-6 · Cited by 165
Del Arco, A., & Mora, F. (2008) · Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.pbb.2008.04.011 · Cited by 163
McCool, B. A., & Chappell, A. M. (2008) · Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research · doi:10.1111/j.1530-0277.2008.00830.x · Cited by 160
Boecker, R., Holz, N. E., Buchmann, A. F., Blomeyer, D., Plichta, M. M., Wolf, I., Baumeister, S., Meyer-Lindenberg, A., Banaschewski, T., Brandeis, D., et al. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0104185 · Cited by 157 · cited 3×
“Using the monetary incentive delay task, four studies demonstrated decreased activity in regions of basal ganglia during the anticipation phase, suggesting reduced approach motivation in individuals who were exposed to institutionalization or early life adversity prior to adolescence (Boecker et al., 2014; Boecker-Sch…”
BackgroundCastellanos-Ryan, N., Rubia, K., & Conrod, P. J. (2011) · Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research · doi:10.1111/j.1530-0277.2010.01331.x · Cited by 152
On the nature and consequences of early loss
Hofer, M. A. (1996) · Psychosomatic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00006842-199611000-00005 · Cited by 152 · cited 1×
“Processing: The neonatal rat relies upon the dam for protection from predators, nutrition, thermoregulation, and proper elimination of waste (Hofer, 1996).”
BackgroundThe neurobiological correlates of childhood adversity and implications for treatment
Tyrka, A. R., Burgers, D. E., Philip, N. S., Price, L. H., & Carpenter, L. L. (2013) · Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/acps.12143 · Cited by 142 · cited 1×
“, 2006; Pechtel and Pizzagalli, 2013) From a neurobiological perspective, perhaps one of the most well-known effects of ELS is alteration of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis (for reviews, see McCrory et al., 2010; Strüber et al., 2014; Tyrka et al., 2013).”
BackgroundSelf-citationGarland, E. L. (2016) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/nyas.13034 · Cited by 137 · cited 2×
“Another example is specialized mindfulness training for addiction, which has been hypothesized to restructure associative learning and valuation of natural rewards via alterations to anterior cingulate and ventral striatal activity (Garland, 2016).”
BackgroundBehavioral Alterations in Reward System Function
GUYER, A. E., KAUFMAN, J., HODGDON, H. B., MASTEN, C. L., JAZBEC, S., PINE, D. S., & ERNST, M. (2006) · Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/01.chi.0000227882.50404.11 · Cited by 137
Kalivas, P. W., Duffy, P., & Latimer, L. G. (1987) · The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/s0022-3565(25)39170-6 · Cited by 137 · cited 1×
“Postnatally, CRF and glucocorticoids can potentiate dopamine release (Bagosi et al., 2006; Kalivas et al., 1987; Piazza et al., 1996).”
BackgroundYorgason, J. T., España, R. A., Konstantopoulos, J. K., Weiner, J. L., & Jones, S. R. (2013) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/ejn.12113 · Cited by 136 · cited 1×
“…by increased basal dopamine in the nucleus accumbens, increased firing of midbrain dopaminergic neurons (Fabricius et al., 2010), and increased dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens in response to psychostimulants (Hall et al., 1998b; Heidbreder et al., 2000; Yorgason et al., 2016, 2013).”
BackgroundDopaminergic Enhancement of Striatal Response to Reward in Major Depression
Admon, R., Kaiser, R. H., Dillon, D. G., Beltzer, M., Goer, F., Olson, D. P., Vitaliano, G. D., & Pizzagalli, D. A. (2016) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2016.16010111 · Cited by 136 · cited 1×
“Given the role of dopamine in various aspects of reward processing, dopaminergic agents might have utility in enhancing reward learning and approach motivation when used in conjunction with behavioral training (Acheson et al., 2013; Admon et al., 2016).”
BackgroundEarly adversity and learning: implications for typical and atypical behavioral development
Hanson, J. L., van den Bos, W., Roeber, B. J., Rudolph, K. D., Davidson, R. J., & Pollak, S. D. (2017) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/jcpp.12694 · Cited by 136 · cited 3×
“For example, women with a history of both childhood sexual abuse and MDD (Pechtel and Pizzagalli, 2013), adolescents exposed to physical abuse (Hanson et al., 2017), and young adults who had high levels of various adversities in early life (Birn et al.”
BackgroundCasement, M. D., Guyer, A. E., Hipwell, A. E., McAloon, R. L., Hoffmann, A. M., Keenan, K. E., & Forbes, E. E. (2014) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2013.12.003 · Cited by 133 · cited 2×
“Viewing deficits in reward processing as a risk factor for the development of psychopathology in individuals who have experienced abuse, maltreatment, or neglect opens the possibility for early interventions prior to the development of diagnosable psychopathology (Casement et al., 2014; McCrory and Viding, 2015).”
BackgroundBrenes, J. C., & Fornaguera, J. (2008) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2008.10.036 · Cited by 132
Corral-Frías, N. S., Nikolova, Y. S., Michalski, L. J., Baranger, D. A. A., Hariri, A. R., & Bogdan, R. (2015) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291715000525 · Cited by 132 · cited 1×
“, 2013), but often found to mediate the relationship between ELS and depression (Corral-Frías et al., 2015; Hanson et al., 2015).”
BackgroundInefficient effort allocation and negative symptoms in individuals with schizophrenia
McCarthy, J. M., Treadway, M. T., Bennett, M. E., & Blanchard, J. J. (2016) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/j.schres.2015.12.017 · Cited by 131
Repeated maternal separation does not alter sucrose-reinforced and open-field behaviors
Shalev, U., & Kafkafi, N. (2002) · Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0091-3057(02)00756-6 · Cited by 130 · cited 1×
“, 2015) or no change in sucrose preference (Matthews et al., 1996a; Mrdalj et al., 2016; Øines et al., 2012; Rüedi-Bettschen et al., 2005; Shalev and Kafkafi, 2002; Uchida et al., 2010), while others have reported increases in sucrose preference (Ferreira et al.”
BackgroundPryce, C. R., Dettling, A. C., Spengler, M., Schnell, C. R., & Feldon, J. (2004) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.05.002 · Cited by 124 · cited 2×
“In one frequently cited study in marmoset monkeys, daily bouts of isolation from parents for the first month of life resulted in unchanged free consumption of a sweet solution at seven months, but decreased effort expenditure on a progressive reinforcement schedule (Pryce et al., 2004).”
BackgroundPohl, J., Olmstead, M. C., Wynne-Edwards, K. E., Harkness, K., & Menard, J. L. (2007) · Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.1037/0735-7044.121.3.462 · Cited by 120 · cited 2×
“While there are fewer studies of reward processing in studies using these other models of ELS compared to maternal separation and social isolation, there is some indication that female rats exposed to variable stressors in adolescence (restraint, social defeat) demonstrate subsequent deficits in sucrose consumption (B…”
BackgroundNeurobehavioral markers of resilience to depression amongst adolescents exposed to child abuse
Dennison, M. J., Sheridan, M. A., Busso, D. S., Jenness, J. L., Peverill, M., Rosen, M. L., & McLaughlin, K. A. (2016) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/abn0000215 · Cited by 117
Social isolation rearing increases dopamine uptake and psychostimulant potency in the striatum
Yorgason, J. T., Calipari, E. S., Ferris, M. J., Karkhanis, A. N., Fordahl, S. C., Weiner, J. L., & Jones, S. R. (2015) · Neuropharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2015.10.025 · Cited by 114
Hong, S. S., Flashner, B. M., Chiu, M., Hoeve, E. S. V., Luz, S., & Bhatnagar, S. (2011) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.08.036 · Cited by 105
Using fMRI to study reward processing in humans: past, present, and future
Wang, K. S., Smith, D. V., & Delgado, M. R. (2016) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00333.2015 · Cited by 105
Hall, F. S., Huang, S., Pert, A., Linnoila, M., & Fong, G. W. (1998) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s002130050706 · Cited by 104
Incentive motivation and behavioral inhibition in socially-isolated rats
Morgan, M. J. (1975) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/0031-9384(75)90205-x · Cited by 103 · cited 1×
“For example, despite enhanced approach motivation compared to socially housed controls, when a reward task requires fewer lever presses, socially isolated rats end up receiving less reward due to perseveration (Morgan and Einon, 1975).”
Bryce, C. A., & Floresco, S. (2016) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2016.15 · Cited by 102 · cited 1×
“…relevant to reward processing, as receptors for CRF and glucocorticoids are located throughout the reward circuitry of the brain, with their activation or blockade affecting reward-sensitive neurotransmission and behaviors (Bryce and Floresco, 2016; Craenenbroeck et al., 2005; Walsh et al., 2014).”
BackgroundVazquez, V., Penit-Soria, J., Durand, C., Besson, M. J., Giros, B., & Daugé, V. (2005) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4807-04.2005 · Cited by 101 · cited 3×
“, 2010), while others have reported increases in sucrose preference (Ferreira et al., 2013; Vazquez et al., 2005).”
BackgroundHill, R. A., Klug, M., Kiss Von Soly, S., Binder, M. D., Hannan, A. J., & van den Buuse, M. (2014) · Hippocampus · doi:10.1002/hipo.22302 · Cited by 99 · cited 1×
“Several studies found that while maternal separation by itself did not result in changes in sucrose preference, occurrence of a second stressor or challenge in adolescence or adulthood resulted in reduced sucrose preference (Hill et al., 2014; Klug and van den Buuse, 2012; Uchida et al., 2010).”
BackgroundBrenes, J. C., & Fornaguera, J. (2008) · Neuroscience Letters · doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2008.03.045 · Cited by 99
Rüedi-Bettschen, D., Pedersen, E.-M., Feldon, J., & Pryce, C. R. (2005) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2004.06.001 · Cited by 97 · cited 2×
“, 2015) or no change in sucrose preference (Matthews et al., 1996a; Mrdalj et al., 2016; Øines et al., 2012; Rüedi-Bettschen et al., 2005; Shalev and Kafkafi, 2002; Uchida et al., 2010), while others have reported increases in sucrose preference (Ferreira et al.”
BackgroundDunn, A. J., & Swiergiel, A. H. (2008) · European Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.ejphar.2007.11.069 · Cited by 94
Matthews, K., Hall, F. S., Wilkinson, L. S., & Robbins, T. W. (1996) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/bf02246414 · Cited by 93 · cited 6×
“As mentioned above, reduced conditioning to predictive appetitive cues, while possibly reflecting decreased motivation, might also indicate impairments in associative learning (Matthews et al., 1996a, 1996b).”
BackgroundInfluentialHui, J., Zhang, Z., Liu, S., Xi, G., Zhang, X.-R., Teng, G., Chan, K. C., Wu, E. X., Nie, B., Shan, B., et al. (2010) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2010.10.014 · Cited by 92 · cited 1×
“Numerous studies of the effects of maternal separation on sucrose preference have reported decreased preference (Amiri et al., 2016; Bolton et al., 2018; Hui et al., 2011; Sadeghi et al., 2016; Shu et al., 2015) or no change in sucrose preference (Matthews et al.”
BackgroundSmoski, M. J., Rittenberg, A., & Dichter, G. S. (2011) · Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging · doi:10.1016/j.pscychresns.2011.06.012 · Cited by 91 · cited 1×
“It should be noted that in various studies utilizing fMRI and the monetary incentive delay task, changes in ventral striatal activation are often found in the absence of changes in reaction time (Jansma et al., 2013; Saji et al., 2013; Smoski et al., 2011), suggesting that reaction time may lack sensitivity as a marke…”
ResultDisrupted social development enhances the motivation for cocaine in rats
Baarendse, P. J. J., Limpens, J. H. W., & Vanderschuren, L. J. M. J. (2014) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00213-013-3362-8 · Cited by 87 · cited 1×
“Opposite to the effects on dopamine in the nucleus accumbens, PFC dopamine is decreased following social isolation, as evidenced by decreased turnover as well as decreased sensitivity to dopamine agonists (Baarendse et al., 2013; Heidbreder et al., 2000).”
BackgroundPalma‐Gudiel, H., & Fañanás, L. (2016) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.11.011 · Cited by 87 · cited 1×
“, 2008), as well as genetic and epigenetic risk and protective factors (Caspi et al., 2003; Palma-Gudiel and Fañanás, 2016).”
BackgroundPechtel, P., & Pizzagalli, D. A. (2013) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.728 · Cited by 83
Sadeghi, M., Peeri, M., & Hosseini, M.-J. (2016) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.05.017 · Cited by 83 · cited 1×
“Numerous studies of the effects of maternal separation on sucrose preference have reported decreased preference (Amiri et al., 2016; Bolton et al., 2018; Hui et al., 2011; Sadeghi et al., 2016; Shu et al., 2015) or no change in sucrose preference (Matthews et al.”
BackgroundLife stress in adolescence predicts early adult reward-related brain function and alcohol dependence
Casement, M. D., Shaw, D. S., Sitnick, S. L., Musselman, S. C., & Forbes, E. E. (2015) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsu061 · Cited by 82 · cited 1×
“A similar mediating effect of reduced activity in the mPFC during reward anticipation was found with alcohol dependence (Casement et al., 2015).”
BackgroundCarlyle, B. C., Duque, A., Kitchen, R. R., Bordner, K. A., Coman, D., Doolittle, E., Papademetris, X., Hyder, F., Taylor, J. R., & Simen, A. A. (2012) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s095457941200079x · Cited by 80 · cited 1×
“Maternal separation interferes with the postnatal regulatory influence that the mother has on the animal’s physiology and development, and is considered by many to be an analog of human child neglect (Carlyle et al., 2012; Pryce et al., 2005).”
BackgroundMaternal depression and warmth during childhood predict age 20 neural response to reward
Morgan, J. K., Shaw, D. S., & Forbes, E. E. (2014) · Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.jaac.2013.10.003 · Cited by 74 · cited 2×
“In young adult males, low maternal warmth in early childhood was associated with increased medial prefrontal cortex and striatal activation during anticipation of monetary reward (Morgan et al., 2014).”
BackgroundIsolation rearing effects on probabilistic learning and cognitive flexibility in rats
Amitai, N., Young, J. W., Higa, K., Sharp, R. F., Geyer, M. A., & Powell, S. B. (2014) · Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/s13415-013-0204-4 · Cited by 74 · cited 1×
“This paradigm also results in deficits in reversal learning (Amitai et al., 2014; Li et al., 2007), as well as in learning new strategies based on a previously unrelated cue (attentional set shifting) (Schrijver and Würbel, 2001).”
BackgroundAmiri, S., Amini-Khoei, H., Mohammadi‐Asl, A., Alijanpour, S., Haj‐Mirzaian, A., Rahimi-Balaei, M., Razmi, A., Olson, C. O., Rastegar, M., Mehdizadeh, M., et al. (2016) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.04.052 · Cited by 74 · cited 1×
“Numerous studies of the effects of maternal separation on sucrose preference have reported decreased preference (Amiri et al., 2016; Bolton et al., 2018; Hui et al., 2011; Sadeghi et al., 2016; Shu et al., 2015) or no change in sucrose preference (Matthews et al.”
BackgroundPloj, K., Roman, E., & Nylander, I. (2003) · Neuropeptides · doi:10.1016/s0143-4179(03)00043-x · Cited by 71 · cited 1×
“Changes to the opioid system are also apparent with maternal separation, but conflicting results also exist based on specific methodology, demonstrating both increases and decreases in levels of endogenous peptides (Ploj et al., 2003; Vazquez et al., 2005) as well as sensitivity to ligands (Kalinichev et al.”
BackgroundEarly social deprivation disrupts attentional, but not affective, shifts in rats
Schrijver, N. C., & Würbel, H. (2001) · Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.1037/0735-7044.115.2.437 · Cited by 70 · cited 1×
“, 2007), as well as in learning new strategies based on a previously unrelated cue (attentional set shifting) (Schrijver and Würbel, 2001).”
BackgroundVentral striatum and amygdala activity as convergence sites for early adversity and conduct disorder
Holz, N. E., Boecker-Schlier, R., Buchmann, A. F., Blomeyer, D., Jennen-Steinmetz, C., Baumeister, S., Plichta, M. M., Cattrell, A., Schumann, G., Esser, G., et al. (2016) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsw120 · Cited by 70
Sasagawa, T., Horii-Hayashi, N., Okuda, A., Hashimoto, T., Azuma, C., & Nishi, M. (2017) · Neuroscience Letters · doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2017.01.025 · Cited by 68 · cited 1×
“, 1996b, 1996a) as well as decreased conditioned place preference to chocolate (Sasagawa et al., 2017) indicative of a decreased reward valuation/incentive salience function within the approach motivation construct.”
BackgroundIncentive motivation and behavioral inhibition in socially-isolated rats
Morgan, M. J., & Einon, D. F. (1975) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/0031-9384(75)90250-4 · Cited by 67
Øines, E., Murison, R., Mrdalj, J., Grønli, J., & Milde, A. M. (2012) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.11.024 · Cited by 66 · cited 1×
“, 2015) or no change in sucrose preference (Matthews et al., 1996a; Mrdalj et al., 2016; Øines et al., 2012; Rüedi-Bettschen et al., 2005; Shalev and Kafkafi, 2002; Uchida et al., 2010), while others have reported increases in sucrose preference (Ferreira et al.”
BackgroundRole of glucocorticoids in dopamine-related neuropsychiatric disorders
Craenenbroeck, K. V., Bosscher, K. D., Berghe, W. V., Vanhoenacker, P., & Haegeman, G. (2005) · Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.mce.2005.10.007 · Cited by 64 · cited 1×
“Such alterations are relevant to reward processing, as receptors for CRF and glucocorticoids are located throughout the reward circuitry of the brain, with their activation or blockade affecting reward-sensitive neurotransmission and behaviors (Bryce and Floresco, 2016; Craenenbroeck et al., 2005; Walsh et al., 2014).”
BackgroundChronic administration of clozapine alleviates reversal-learning impairment in isolation-reared rats
Li, N., Wu, X. H., & Li, L. (2007) · Behavioural Pharmacology · doi:10.1097/fbp.0b013e3280d3ee83 · Cited by 61 · cited 1×
“This paradigm also results in deficits in reversal learning (Amitai et al., 2014; Li et al., 2007), as well as in learning new strategies based on a previously unrelated cue (attentional set shifting) (Schrijver and Würbel, 2001).”
BackgroundPisu, M. G., Dore, R., Mostallino, M. C., Loi, M., Pibiri, F., Mameli, R., Cadeddu, R., Secci, P. P., & Serra, M. (2011) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2011.03.021 · Cited by 59 · cited 2×
“In tasks measuring liking, social isolation generally results in increased sucrose preference (Brenes and Fornaguera, 2008, 2009; Colonnello et al., 2011; Hall et al., 1998a; Van den Berg et al., 2000), although there are some discrepant reports (McCool and Chappell, 2009; Pisu et al., 2011).”
BackgroundZhang, X., Sanchez, H., Kehoe, P., & Kosten, T. A. (2004) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00213-004-1963-y · Cited by 59
Jansma, J. M., van Hell, H. H., Vanderschuren, L. J. M. J., Bossong, M. G., Jager, G., Kahn, R. S., & Ramsey, N. F. (2013) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/tp.2013.6 · Cited by 58 · cited 1×
“It should be noted that in various studies utilizing fMRI and the monetary incentive delay task, changes in ventral striatal activation are often found in the absence of changes in reaction time (Jansma et al., 2013; Saji et al., 2013; Smoski et al., 2011), suggesting that reaction time may lack sensitivity as a marke…”
ResultKalinichev, M., Easterling, K. W., & Holtzman, S. G. (2001) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s002130100806 · Cited by 56 · cited 1×
“, 2005) as well as sensitivity to ligands (Kalinichev et al., 2001; Vazquez et al., 2005).”
BackgroundIncreased dopaminergic activity in socially isolated rats: An electrophysiological study
Fabricius, K., Helboe, L., Fink‐Jensen, A., Wörtwein, G., Steiniger‐Brach, B., & Sotty, F. (2010) · Neuroscience Letters · doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2010.07.014 · Cited by 56 · cited 1×
“Specifically, the literature supports that there is an overall increase in nucleus accumbens dopamine function following social isolation, as evidenced by increased basal dopamine in the nucleus accumbens, increased firing of midbrain dopaminergic neurons (Fabricius et al., 2010), and increased dopamine release in the…”
BackgroundPollak, S. D. (2015) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s0954579415000826 · Cited by 56 · cited 2×
“This might be especially true in the case of early life physical and sexual abuse, where inconsistency in caregiver behavior would preclude early experiences of using cues to predict reward outcome (Hanson et al., 2017; Pollak, 2015).”
BackgroundSuomi, S. J., van der Horst, F. C. P., & van der Veer, R. (2008) · Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science · doi:10.1007/s12124-008-9072-9 · Cited by 54 · cited 1×
“ELS and Reward Processing: Preclinical Data Early animal studies on developmental adversity, such as those by Harry Harlow (Harlow, 1958) and Seymour Levine (Levine, 1957), emerged in the 1950s, inspired both by early psychoanalytic theories and by the deprivations of civilian populations during World War II (Suomi et…”
BackgroundThe effects of isolation-rearing on sucrose consumption in rats
HALL, F., HUMBY, T., WILKINSON, L., & ROBBINS, T. (1997) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0031-9384(97)00116-9 · Cited by 54 · cited 1×
“Increased indices of approach motivation are also found following social isolation, with evidence of enhanced responding for increasing concentrations of sucrose (Cuenya et al., 2015; Hall et al., 1997), as well as greater conditioned responses to sucrose-related stimuli (Jones et al.”
BackgroundShared neural basis of social and non-social reward deficits in chronic cocaine users
Tobler, P. N., Preller, K. H., Campbell-Meiklejohn, D. K., Kirschner, M., Kraehenmann, R., Stämpfli, P., Herdener, M., Seifritz, E., & Quednow, B. B. (2016) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsw030 · Cited by 50 · cited 2×
“Deficits in reward processing are found in MDD (Admon and Pizzagalli, 2015), substance use disorders (Garfield et al., 2014; Tobler et al., 2016), posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (Kalebasi et al., 2015), schizophrenia (McCarthy et al., 2016), and ADHD (van Hulst et al., 2016).”
Backgroundvan Hulst, B. M., de Zeeuw, P., Bos, D. J., Rijks, Y., Neggers, S. F. W., & Durston, S. (2016) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/jcpp.12643 · Cited by 50
Mori, A., Okamoto, Y., Okada, G., Takagaki, K., Jinnin, R., Takamura, M., Kobayakawa, M., & Yamawaki, S. (2016) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2015.09.036 · Cited by 49
Adolescent social defeat decreases spatial working memory performance in adulthood
Novick, A. M., Miiller, L. C., Forster, G. L., & Watt, M. J. (2013) · Behavioral and Brain Functions · doi:10.1186/1744-9081-9-39 · Cited by 47 · cited 1×
“, 2007) while male animals do not (Bourke and Neigh, 2011; Novick et al., 2013; Pohl et al., 2007; Toth et al., 2008).”
BackgroundSwinny, J. D., O'Farrell, E. M., Bingham, B. C., Piel, D., Valentino, R. J., & Beck, S. G. (2009) · The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1017/s146114570999037x · Cited by 47 · cited 1×
“Further evidence of stress sensitivity is indicated by a decrease in alpha-2 adrenergic autoreceptor binding in the locus coeruleus, which promotes enhanced noradrenergic activity in response to stress (Liu et al., 2000; Swinny et al., 2010).”
BackgroundProgramming effects of antenatal dexamethasone in the developing mesolimbic pathways
Leão, P., Sousa, J. C., de Oliveira, M. A. R., Silva, R., Almeida, O. F. X., & Sousa, N. (2006) · Synapse · doi:10.1002/syn.20341 · Cited by 45 · cited 1×
“Glucocorticoid exposure in utero affects the development of dopaminergic neurons in the midbrain (Leão et al., 2007).”
BackgroundBoecker-Schlier, R., Holz, N. E., Buchmann, A. F., Blomeyer, D., Plichta, M. M., Jennen-Steinmetz, C., Wolf, I., Baumeister, S., Treutlein, J., Rietschel, M., et al. (2016) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.02.006 · Cited by 42 · cited 2×
“Using the monetary incentive delay task, four studies demonstrated decreased activity in regions of basal ganglia during the anticipation phase, suggesting reduced approach motivation in individuals who were exposed to institutionalization or early life adversity prior to adolescence (Boecker et al., 2014; Boecker-Sch…”
BackgroundMorphine attenuates the effects of juvenile isolation in rats
den Berg, C. L. V., van Ree, J. M., & Spruijt, B. M. (2000) · Neuropharmacology · doi:10.1016/s0028-3908(99)00216-6 · Cited by 41
Maternal Separation and the Risk of Drug Abuse in Later Life.
Delavari, F., Sheibani, V., Esmaeili‐Mahani, S., & Nakhaee, N. (2016) · PubMed · Cited by 40
Effects of social isolation and crowding upon adrenocortical reactivity and behavior in the rat.
Viveros, M., Hernández, R., Martínez, I. T. M., & González, P. (1988) · PubMed · Cited by 39
Comparison of depressive behaviors induced by three stress paradigms in rats
Bai, M., Zhang, L., Zhu, X., Zhang, Y., Zhang, S., & Xue, L. (2014) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.04.019 · Cited by 37
Baranger, D. A. A., Ifrah, C., Prather, A. A., Carey, C. E., Corral-Frías, N. S., Drabant, E. M., Hariri, A. R., & Bogdan, R. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00464 · Cited by 36
Sucrose and quinine intake by maternally-deprived and control rhesus monkeys
Paul, I. A., English, J. A., & Halaris, A. E. (2000) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0166-4328(00)00173-x · Cited by 35
Klug, M., & van den Buuse, M. (2012) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2012.05.019 · Cited by 34
Modeling Neuropsychiatric Disorders in Laboratory Animals
(2016) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2014-0-02345-3 · Cited by 33 · cited 1×
“While it can be argued that choosing between two containers and consuming the fluid from one requires aspects of learning and approach motivation, Hoffman (2015) has argued that the sucrose preference test is more specific to liking due to lack of work that the animal has to perform.”
BackgroundNeonatal stress and litter composition alter sucrose intake in both rat dam and offspring
Michaels, C. C., & Holtzman, S. G. (2006) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2006.08.015 · Cited by 32
Early social and physical deprivation leads to reduced social motivation in adulthood in Wistar rats
Mintz, M., Rüedi‐Bettschen, D., Feldon, J., & Pryce, C. R. (2004) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2004.08.017 · Cited by 31
Artificial rearing alters the response of rats to natural and drug-mediated rewards
Lomanowska, A. M., Rana, S. A., McCutcheon, D., Parker, L. A., & Wainwright, P. E. (2006) · Developmental Psychobiology · doi:10.1002/dev.20139 · Cited by 31
Li, X., Xiao, Y.-H., Zou, L., Li, H.-H., Yang, Z., Shi, H., Lui, S. S. Y., Cheung, E. F. C., & Chan, R. C. K. (2016) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2016.09.006 · Cited by 31 · cited 1×
“While this remains to be tested, there are data showing that cognitive remediation, including working memory training and mindfulness, can enhance reward processing in non-clinical populations with high trait social anhedonia (Li et al., 2016) and in prescription opioid abusers (Garland, 2016).”
BackgroundRobbins, T. (2016) · Journal of Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1177/0269881116664450 · Cited by 31 · cited 2×
“By depriving animals of the play experiences that normally guide cortical development, post-weaning social isolation is conceptualized as a rodent model of adolescent adversity with long-lasting effects on neurobiology and behavior (Fone and Porkess, 2008; Lukkes et al., 2009; Robbins, 2016).”
BackgroundFerreira, C. F., Bernardi, J. R., Krolow, R., Arcego, D. M., Fries, G. R., de Aguiar, B. W., Senter, G., Kapczinski, F. P., Silveira, P. P., & Dalmaz, C. (2013) · Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.pbb.2013.03.006 · Cited by 28 · cited 1×
“, 2010), while others have reported increases in sucrose preference (Ferreira et al., 2013; Vazquez et al., 2005).”
BackgroundAcheson, D. T., Twamley, E. W., & Young, J. W. (2013) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2013.00103 · Cited by 26 · cited 1×
“Given the role of dopamine in various aspects of reward processing, dopaminergic agents might have utility in enhancing reward learning and approach motivation when used in conjunction with behavioral training (Acheson et al., 2013; Admon et al., 2016).”
BackgroundPlacek, K., Dippel, W. C., Jones, S., & Brady, A. M. (2013) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2013.08.034 · Cited by 25 · cited 1×
“Such reversal is known to depend on an intact orbitofrontal cortex to inhibit the prior learned response (Placek et al., 2013; Rolls, 2016).”
BackgroundBlunted responses to reward in remitted post‐traumatic stress disorder
Kalebasi, N., Kuelen, E., Schnyder, U., Schumacher, S., Mueller‐Pfeiffer, C., Wilhelm, F. H., Athilingam, J. C., Moergeli, H., & Martin-Söelch, C. (2015) · Brain and Behavior · doi:10.1002/brb3.357 · Cited by 23 · cited 2×
“Deficits in reward processing are found in MDD (Admon and Pizzagalli, 2015), substance use disorders (Garfield et al., 2014; Tobler et al., 2016), posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (Kalebasi et al., 2015), schizophrenia (McCarthy et al., 2016), and ADHD (van Hulst et al., 2016).”
BackgroundShu, C., Xiao, L., Tang, J., Wang, G., Zhang, X., & Wang, X. (2015) · The Tohoku Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1620/tjem.235.81 · Cited by 22 · cited 1×
“Numerous studies of the effects of maternal separation on sucrose preference have reported decreased preference (Amiri et al., 2016; Bolton et al., 2018; Hui et al., 2011; Sadeghi et al., 2016; Shu et al., 2015) or no change in sucrose preference (Matthews et al.”
BackgroundSaji, K., Ikeda, Y., Kim, W., Shingai, Y., Tateno, A., Takahashi, H., Okubo, Y., Fukayama, H., & Suzuki, H. (2013) · International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1017/s1461145712001678 · Cited by 19 · cited 2×
“It should be noted that in various studies utilizing fMRI and the monetary incentive delay task, changes in ventral striatal activation are often found in the absence of changes in reaction time (Jansma et al., 2013; Saji et al., 2013; Smoski et al., 2011), suggesting that reaction time may lack sensitivity as a marke…”
BackgroundCampbell, E. J., Mitchell, C. S., Adams, C. D., Yeoh, J. W., Hodgson, D. M., Graham, B. A., & Dayas, C. V. (2017) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/ejn.13674 · Cited by 17 · cited 1×
“, 2005) or provided on a fixed ratio (Campbell et al., 2017).”
BackgroundBagosi, Z., Jászberényi, M., Bujdosó, E., & Telegdy, G. (2006) · Neurochemical Research · doi:10.1007/s11064-005-9010-x · Cited by 15 · cited 1×
“Postnatally, CRF and glucocorticoids can potentiate dopamine release (Bagosi et al., 2006; Kalivas et al., 1987; Piazza et al., 1996).”
BackgroundColonnello, V., Iacobucci, P., Anderson, M. P., & Panksepp, J. (2011) · Developmental Psychobiology · doi:10.1002/dev.20520 · Cited by 13 · cited 1×
“In tasks measuring liking, social isolation generally results in increased sucrose preference (Brenes and Fornaguera, 2008, 2009; Colonnello et al., 2011; Hall et al., 1998a; Van den Berg et al., 2000), although there are some discrepant reports (McCool and Chappell, 2009; Pisu et al.”
BackgroundPostweaning isolation affects responses to incentive contrast in adulthood
Cuenya, L., Mustaca, A., & Kamenetzky, G. (2015) · Developmental Psychobiology · doi:10.1002/dev.21273 · Cited by 9 · cited 1×
“Increased indices of approach motivation are also found following social isolation, with evidence of enhanced responding for increasing concentrations of sucrose (Cuenya et al., 2015; Hall et al., 1997), as well as greater conditioned responses to sucrose-related stimuli (Jones et al.”
Background[Effect of maternal deprivation on emotion and expression of dopamine transporter in adult rats].
Zhu, X., Peng, S., Ma, X., et al. (2010) · PubMed · doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-7347.2010.01.005 · Cited by 7 · cited 1×
“The enhanced sensitivity to psychostimulants found in the latter studies might be due to decreases in dopamine transporter levels within the nucleus accumbens of maternally separated rats, limiting dopamine clearance (Brake et al., 2004; Meaney et al., 2002; Zhu et al., 2010).”
BackgroundMrdalj, J., Murison, R. C. C., Soule, J. D., Rød, A. M. K., Milde, A. M., Pallesen, S., & Grønli, J. (2016) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.08.018 · Cited by 7 · cited 1×
“, 2015) or no change in sucrose preference (Matthews et al., 1996a; Mrdalj et al., 2016; Øines et al., 2012; Rüedi-Bettschen et al., 2005; Shalev and Kafkafi, 2002; Uchida et al., 2010), while others have reported increases in sucrose preference (Ferreira et al.”
BackgroundAndersen (2000) · doi:10.1002/1098-2396(200008)37:2
Bubser, M., & Deutch, A. Y. (1999) · Synapse · doi:10.1002/(sici)1098-2396(199904)32:1
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Andersen, 2008, Desperately driven and no brakes: developmental stress exposure and subsequent risk for substance abuse, Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The effects of social deprivation on adolescent development and mental health
Orben, A., Tomova, L., & Blakemore, S.-J. (2020) · The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health · doi:10.1016/s2352-4642(20)30186-3 · Cited by 1,383
“Complete social isolation in adolescent rodents evokes widespread structural and functional changes in the brain, most prominently in neuromodulatory dopamine and serotonin systems and particularly within cortical and striatal targets ( 34 – 36 ).”
InfluentialEarly life stress and development: potential mechanisms for adverse outcomes
Smith, K. E., & Pollak, S. D. (2020) · Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders · doi:10.1186/s11689-020-09337-y · Cited by 500
Smith, K. E., & Pollak, S. D. (2020) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691620920725 · Cited by 379
“…parental inputs, as characterized by abuse or institutional deprivation, has also been associated with deficits in associative-learning processes (Ironside, Kumar, Kang, & Pizzagalli, 2018; Novick et al., 2018) and altered stress responsivity (Hostinar & Gunnar, 2013; B. S. McEwen & McEwen, 2017).”
BackgroundTeicher, M. H., Gordon, J. B., & Nemeroff, C. B. (2022) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-021-01367-9 · Cited by 325
“and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex [41, 45], and with enhanced amygdala response to threat [39, 46] and blunted striatal response to reward anticipation [47, 48].”
BackgroundAcute social isolation evokes midbrain craving responses similar to hunger
Tomova, L., Wang, K. L., Thompson, T., Matthews, G. A., Takahashi, A., Tye, K. M., & Saxe, R. (2020) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-020-00742-z · Cited by 283
“Extended periods of isolation, especially during development, can dramatically disrupt behavior and brain function 12-14 .”
Metadata
- Authors
- Novick, A. M., Levandowski, M. L., Laumann, L. E., Philip, N. S., Price, L. H., & Tyrka, A. R.
- Affiliations
- Brown University (US)
- Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (BR)
- Butler Hospital (US)
- Corresponding author
- Novick, Andrew M.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Psychiatric Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-06
- Volume
- 101
- Pages
- 80-103
- ISSN
- 0022-3956 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5889741
- OpenAlex
- W2791377417
- Semantic Scholar
- db4ef509ccbc0888c008f7fa805bf87f16a9c988
- Cited by
- 192
- References
- 203
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5
- FWCI
- 3.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Psychiatric Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (R25 MH090947, R01HD086487, R01 MH101107)
- U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (IK2 CX000724)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Keywords
- early life stress, reward processing, child abuse, childhood abuse, child neglect, ventral striatum, approach motivation, transdiagnostic mechanisms, at-risk youth, psychiatric risk
- MeSH terms
- Adverse Childhood Experiences, Animals, Child, Humans, Reward, Stress, Psychological, Anhedonia
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-07, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-07 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review