The DOI matches its Crossref record; 627 of the 627 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 37 of the 405 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Enrichment Effects on Adult Cognitive Development: Can the Functional Capacity of Older Adults Be Preserved and Enhanced?
Open accessAbstract
In this monograph, we ask whether various kinds of intellectual, physical, and social activities produce cognitive enrichment effects—that is, whether they improve cognitive performance at different points of the adult life span, with a particular emphasis on old age. We begin with a theoretical framework that emphasizes the potential of behavior to influence levels of cognitive functioning. According to this framework, the undeniable presence of age-related decline in cognition does not invalidate the view that behavior can enhance cognitive functioning. Instead, the course of normal aging shapes a zone of possible functioning, which reflects person-specific endowments and age-related constraints. Individuals influence whether they function in the higher or lower ranges of this zone by engaging in or refraining from beneficial intellectual, physical, and social activities. From this point of view, the potential for positive change, or plasticity, is maintained in adult cognition. It is an argument that is supported by newer research in neuroscience showing neural plasticity in various aspects of central nervous system functioning, neurochemistry, and architecture. This view of human potential contrasts with static conceptions of cognition in old age, according to which decline in abilities is fixed and individuals cannot slow its course. Furthermore, any understanding of cognition as it occurs in everyday life must make a distinction between basic cognitive mechanisms and skills (such as working-memory capacity) and the functional use of cognition to achieve goals in specific situations. In practice, knowledge and expertise are critical for effective functioning, and the available evidence suggests that older adults effectively employ specific knowledge and expertise and can gain new knowledge when it is required. We conclude that, on balance, the available evidence favors the hypothesis that maintaining an intellectually engaged and physically active lifestyle promotes successful cognitive aging. First, cognitive-training studies have demonstrated that older adults can improve cognitive functioning when provided with intensive training in strategies that promote thinking and remembering. The early training literature suggested little transfer of function from specifically trained skills to new cognitive tasks; learning was highly specific to the cognitive processes targeted by training. Recently, however, a new generation of studies suggests that providing structured experience in situations demanding executive coordination of skills—such as complex video games, task-switching paradigms, and divided attention tasks—train strategic control over cognition that does show transfer to different task environments. These studies suggest that there is considerable reserve potential in older adults' cognition that can be enhanced through training. Second, a considerable number of studies indicate that maintaining a lifestyle that is intellectually stimulating predicts better maintenance of cognitive skills and is associated with a reduced risk of developing Alzheimer's disease in late life. Our review focuses on longitudinal evidence of a connection between an active lifestyle and enhanced cognition, because such evidence admits fewer rival explanations of observed effects (or lack of effects) than does cross-sectional evidence. The longitudinal evidence consistently shows that engaging in intellectually stimulating activities is associated with better cognitive functioning at later points in time. Other studies show that meaningful social engagement is also predictive of better maintenance of cognitive functioning in old age. These longitudinal findings are also open to important rival explanations, but overall, the available evidence suggests that activities can postpone decline, attenuate decline, or provide prosthetic benefit in the face of normative cognitive decline, while at the same time indicating that late-life cognitive changes can result in curtailment of activities. Given the complexity of the dynamic reciprocal relationships between stimulating activities and cognitive function in old age, additional research will be needed to address the extent to which observed effects validate a causal influence of an intellectually engaged lifestyle on cognition. Nevertheless, the hypothesis that an active lifestyle that requires cognitive effort has long-term benefits for older adults' cognition is at least consistent with the available data. Furthermore, new intervention research that involves multimodal interventions focusing on goal-directed action requiring cognition (such as reading to children) and social interaction will help to address whether an active lifestyle enhances cognitive function. Third, there is a parallel literature suggesting that physical activity, and aerobic exercise in particular, enhances older adults' cognitive function. Unlike the literature on an active lifestyle, there is already an impressive array of work with humans and animal populations showing that exercise interventions have substantial benefits for cognitive function, particularly for aspects of fluid intelligence and executive function. Recent neuroscience research on this topic indicates that exercise has substantial effects on brain morphology and function, representing a plausible brain substrate for the observed effects of aerobic exercise and other activities on cognition. Our review identifies a number of areas where additional research is needed to address critical questions. For example, there is considerable epidemiological evidence that stress and chronic psychological distress are negatively associated with changes in cognition. In contrast, less is known about how positive attributes, such as self-efficacy, a sense of control, and a sense of meaning in life, might contribute to preservation of cognitive function in old age. It is well known that certain personality characteristics such as conscientiousness predict adherence to an exercise regimen, but we do not know whether these attributes are also relevant to predicting maintenance of cognitive function or effective compensation for cognitive decline when it occurs. Likewise, more information is needed on the factors that encourage maintenance of an active lifestyle in old age in the face of elevated risk for physiological decline, mechanical wear and tear on the body, and incidence of diseases with disabling consequences, and whether efforts to maintain an active lifestyle are associated with successful aging, both in terms of cognitive function and psychological and emotional well-being. We also discuss briefly some interesting issues for society and public policy regarding cognitive-enrichment effects. For example, should efforts to enhance cognitive function be included as part of a general prevention model for enhancing health and vitality in old age? We also comment on the recent trend of business marketing interventions claimed to build brain power and prevent age-related cognitive decline, and the desirability of direct research evidence to back claims of effectiveness for specific products.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from a shortened version of the paper’s full text (it is longer than we read).
TL;DR
This monograph reviews whether intellectual, physical, and social enrichment can preserve or improve adult cognition, especially in old age. It concludes that the evidence favors an active, engaged lifestyle, with the strongest support for aerobic exercise, but that causal mechanisms and long-term effects remain uncertain.
Key findings
- Cognitive training can improve older adults’ performance on trained tasks. Early studies found narrow transfer, but newer executive-control, working-memory, and metacognitive training studies show some broader transfer. In the ACTIVE trial, more than 2,500 adults over 65 received about 10 sessions; gains were largely specific, with some 5-year benefits for reasoning training on self-reported instrumental activities.
- Longitudinal studies link mentally stimulating activity to less cognitive decline and lower dementia incidence. In one study of 775 older adults, 90 developed Alzheimer’s disease; low activity was associated with about 2.5 times the risk of high activity. Another study of about 500 people aged 75+ found reduced dementia risk with more cognitive activity over up to 20 years.
- Aerobic exercise shows the most consistent enrichment effects. A meta-analysis of 18 randomized fitness-training studies found a moderate overall effect size of .48, with the largest benefit for executive-control processes at .68. A separate meta-analysis in cognitively impaired older adults found an effect size of .57. In a study of 5,925 women, 24% of the least-active quartile declined cognitively versus 17% of the most-active quartile, about a 30% risk reduction.
- Social engagement and lower chronic distress are also associated with better cognitive outcomes. High neuroticism was linked to nearly twice the Alzheimer’s risk in one study and to a nearly tenfold higher rate of episodic-memory decline; frequent social activity was associated with about 40% lower dementia risk in one population.
Methods
- Design: integrative narrative review/monograph, not a new primary study. It develops a life-span theoretical framework and evaluates evidence for cognitive-enrichment effects.
- Data/sample: synthesizes human and animal research, including cross-sectional studies, longitudinal panel studies, randomized interventions, meta-analyses, clinical-pathologic studies, neuroimaging, and enriched-environment/exercise animal models.
- Main analysis: qualitative synthesis of evidence, with attention to rival explanations, methodological problems, effect sizes, transfer, maintenance, and policy/research implications.
Limitations
- Stated: the literature is not definitive; enrichment effect sizes are often small; self-report activity measures have uncertain validity; observational studies cannot establish causality; training transfer is often narrow; maintenance is rarely assessed beyond 1–2 years; many training studies use fewer than 10 sessions; mechanisms remain unclear; long-term, multimodal, midlife, and biological research is needed.
- Stated: cognitive enrichment is not a panacea; biological aging can be delayed but not prevented, and the limits of intervention have not been tested.
- Evident from the text: as a narrative review, it does not use a systematic search or pooled meta-analytic estimate across all domains; conclusions depend on selected cited studies, and heterogeneity in designs, activity measures, and cognitive outcomes complicates direct comparison.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
37 of 405 cited sources checked · 19 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“For instance, research suggests that when individuals participate in a cognitive-training program, the beneficial effects on cognitive performance tend to be relatively narrow in scope, usually localized to the specific cognitive test that was trained (e.g., Ball et al., 2002; Willis et al., 2006; but see Tranter & Koutstaal, 2008).”
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Ball et al., 2002 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The COMMENT section reports improvements on multiple measures of the cognitive ability trained, without demonstrated transfer to everyday performance over two years. But the Measures section explicitly says outcomes were designed to assess an ability rather than performance on a specific test. The study also concerns older adults, not individuals generally. (LLM, conf=0.88)
- Partly supportedcites Willis et al., 2006 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Training Effects on Cognitive Abilities (p. 6) reports lasting improvement in the cognitive ability each intervention targeted, supporting the claim that benefits were relatively narrow. But Outcome Measures (p. 4) assesses each ability with three tests, so the paper does not establish that benefits were usually confined to the specific test trained. The Comment (p. 8) also reports modest transfer to everyday function. (LLM, conf=0.86)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Tranter & Koutstaal, 2008 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Likewise, animal studies have shown major changes in a variety of mechanisms, such as neurogenesis (growth of new neurons), even in mature animals, as a function of changing environmental contingencies (e.g., Cotman, 1995; Kempermann, 2008).”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Cotman, 1995
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Supportedcites Kempermann, 2008 source
The section “A synthesis of nonspecific and specific regulatory mechanisms” (p. 5) reports that novel, complex environments robustly induced adult neurogenesis even in old mice. The Introduction (p. 2) also reports that exposure to a complex environment beginning in midlife maintained higher neurogenesis. These passages support the neurogenesis example attributed to Kempermann. (LLM, conf=0.93)
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Not matched
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“At another level, compensation may occur by competition and rearrangements among relatively autonomous processing circuits, without explicit awareness on the part of the individual of how he or she is compensating (e.g., Cabeza, 2002; Colcombe, Kramer, Erickson, & Scalf, 2005; Park & Reuter-Lorenz, 2009; ReuterLorenz & Cappel, 2008; Salthouse, 1984; cf. Edelman, 1987).”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Cabeza, 2002 source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Colcombe, Kramer, Erickson, & Scalf, 2005 source
- Partly supportedcites Park & Reuter-Lorenz, 2009 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
In “The Scaffolding Theory of Cognitive Aging” (page unavailable), the paper describes neural compensation as recruiting additional circuitry and developing new pathways when existing circuitry cannot meet task demands. This supports compensation through changes in neural circuits, but the passages do not establish competition among relatively autonomous circuits or say that compensation occurs without explicit awareness. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“When operating close to the limits of performance, individuals tend to experience substantial dropoffs in performance unless they exert sustained, deliberate efforts to maintain peak performance levels (Ericsson, 2006).”
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Ericsson, 2006 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The discussion on p. 685 links deliberate effort to continued improvement, and Figure 38.1 (p. 687) says that experts who stop regular deliberate practice may prematurely automate their performance. Neither passage says that people operating near performance limits tend to suffer substantial drop-offs without such effort; the discussion on p. 687 describes a stable plateau rather than a drop-off. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“The memory training and speedof-processing training did not show differential preservation, relative to controls.”
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Willis et al., 2006 source
The Abstract (p. 2) reports that neither memory nor speed-of-processing training had a significant effect on self-reported IADL difficulty relative to controls. This supports the claim as a statement about everyday functioning; the paper separately reports preserved gains in the cognitive abilities each intervention trained. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Willis et al. (2006) reported 5-year retest data on the sample, showing that training benefits were still observed after the longer retention interval.”
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Willis et al., 2006 source
The Training Effects on Cognitive Abilities section (p. 6) states that each intervention's improvement in the trained ability was retained across five years. This supports the citing sentence's claim that training benefits were still observed at the five-year retest. (LLM, conf=0.93)
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Supported
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“For example, Willis et al. (2006) showed that reasoning training had 5-year lagged benefits on self-reported aspects of instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) by older adults (see also Wolinsky et al., 2006).”
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Willis et al., 2006 source
Training Effects on Daily Functioning (p. 6) reports that, at year 5, the reasoning group had significantly less self-reported IADL difficulty than controls. The Comment (p. 8) says effects on function were not observed until the 5-year follow-up, supporting the description of a lagged benefit. (LLM, conf=0.94)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Wolinsky et al., 2006 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“training in real-time strategy video games that entail learning and coordinating the implementation of a number of complex strategies can engender transfer to a variety of tasks that tap different aspects of executive-control processes”
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Basak, Boot, Voss, & Kramer, 2008 source
The section on correlations between game performance and executive-control tasks reports transfer from Rise of Nations training to task switching, N-back focus switching, and visual short-term memory in older adults. It also describes the game as emphasizing planning, switching between tasks, and executing different strategies, matching the claim’s qualified wording that such training can engender transfer. (LLM, conf=0.91)
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Only the running-wheel and enriched groups showed increased cell proliferation and survival and neurogenesis following the interventions.”
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Van Praag, Christie, Sejnowski, and Gage (1999) sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results show increased surviving BrdU-labeled cells and neuronal markers in runners compared with controls; the Discussion also reports that enriched environments increase survival of newborn cells. But this study tested only runners and controls, not an enriched-environment group or other intervention groups, so it cannot establish that only the two named interventions increased all three outcomes. The supplied passages do not give page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Higher level of social activity has been associated with reduced risk of developing dementia in four prospective studies”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Fabrigoule et al., 1995 source
- Partly supportedcites Scarmeas et al., 2001 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion reports that the paper’s social-activity factor was significantly associated with lower incident dementia risk. But the Discussion and Conclusions identify only two earlier prospective studies, one of which found no significant association for social isolation or support. The source therefore does not support the claim of four prospective studies showing reduced risk. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.90)
- Not matchedcites Wang et al., 2002
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes
- It may state two separate claims as one. 158
- Probably not a substantial claim. 100
- The quote only partly states this claim. 8
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“old brains can grow new neurons, synaptic connections, and new vasculature.”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Greenwood, 2007 source
- Partly supportedcites Kempermann, 2008 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The synthesis section (p. 5) reports low levels of new-neuron production even in the oldest rodent and human subjects studied. The paper also discusses synaptic plasticity and the integration of new neurons into networks (pp. 2–3), but does not establish that aging brains grow new synaptic connections; it does not address new vasculature. Those parts of the claim are unsupported by this source. (LLM, conf=0.87)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Kramer, Bherer, Colcombe, Dong, & Greenough, 2004 source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Although such neural plasticity is reduced in old age, it remains more substantial than previously recognized”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Greenwood, 2007 source
- Partly supportedcites Kempermann, 2008 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The synthesis section (p. 5) says hippocampal neurogenesis declines steeply with age but persists, and that novel environments robustly induce it even in old mice. This supports a substantial remaining capacity for this form of plasticity, but the paper does not establish the claim for neural plasticity generally or explicitly compare it with what was previously recognized. (LLM, conf=0.82)
- Supportedcites Park & Reuter-Lorenz, 2009 source
The scaffolding theory section says age-related declines in neurobiological regeneration limit the aging brain’s plasticity. The Introduction describes the brain and cognitive system as more dynamic and adaptive than previously suspected, supporting the claim’s second half. (LLM, conf=0.91)
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“Although aging may constrain the degree of neuronal plasticity that is possible, studies suggest that enrichedenvironment effects can be observed in older organisms (Brown et al., 2003; Jessberger & Gage, 2008; Kempermann, Kuhn, & Gage, 1998).”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Brown et al., 2003 source
- Supportedcites Jessberger & Gage, 2008 source
The section on NSC-based therapeutic strategies reports that environmental enrichment produced an approximately fivefold increase in newborn granule cells in aged mice. The Conclusion states that aging sharply reduces the number of newborn neurons, yet the aged brain retains the capacity to respond to environmental stimuli with enhanced plasticity. (LLM, conf=0.94)
- Supportedcites Kempermann, Kuhn, & Gage, 1998 source
The Abstract (p. 3206) reports that neurogenesis decreased with age, yet enriched housing increased the number of newly generated neurons in 20-month-old mice. The experience-induced regulation section also states that the aging dentate gyrus retained responsiveness to enrichment. (LLM, conf=0.94)
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“older rheumatoid patients actually do better at remembering to take medications than do their younger and middle-aged peers, probably because they develop helpful daily routines that support remembering in context (Park et al., 1999).”
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Park et al., 1999 source
The Discussion reports that younger adults were more at risk of medication errors than older adults. It also observes that older patients often structure daily activities around medication schedules, whereas younger adults tend to fit medications into their schedules; the paper offers busyness and competing demands on memory as a possible explanation. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Identifying the higher-order generalities in information can also lead to an individual paying less attention to distinctive aspects of information, which can be critical in governing the likelihood of later retrieval of that information”
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Hunt & Smith, 1996 source
On p. 217, the paper says producing a shared cue encourages organizational processing but leaves distinctive information impoverished; that information helps discriminate items during retrieval. This supports the claim that focusing on generalities can reduce processing of distinctive details and affect later recall. (LLM, conf=0.91)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Individuals who drop out from a longitudinal study often differ from those who stay on dimensions of interest-they tend to be less healthy, less cognitively fit, and less engaged in stimulating activities, thereby restricting the observable range of variation (e.g., Ghisletta, McArdle, & Lindenberger, 2006; Lindenberger, Singer, & Baltes, 2002) and potentially biasing estimates of the rel”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Ghisletta, McArdle, & Lindenberger, 2006 source
- Partly supportedcites Lindenberger, Singer, & Baltes, 2002 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“There are individual differences in practice effects, but these individual differences do not appear particularly consistent across measures or strongly related to basic demographic variables like age, sex, and education that are linked to both enrichment variables and cognitive outcomes”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Wilson, Li, et al., 2006
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Partly supportedcites Wilson et al., 2009 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The “Impact of retesting” section (page unavailable) reports improved performance with repeated testing and no association between retest effects and education. It does not establish that individual differences in practice effects are inconsistent across measures or unrelated to age and sex; those variables were controlled for, not reported as predictors of retest effects. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“For example, individuals trained in visual search showed strong gains in visual-search performance but little improvement, relative to controls, in performance on the memory and reasoning tests.”
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Ball et al., 2002 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Interventions section describes speed-of-processing training as focused on visual search, and the Results section reports large gains in the trained speed domain relative to controls. The passages do not report how the visual-search group performed on memory and reasoning tests relative to controls; the Comment section's finding about limited generalization concerns everyday performance, not those tests. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“The results showed strong training effect sizes in each group relative to controls, and also showed a pattern of specificity in performance improvements.”
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Ball et al., 2002 source
The Comment describes ACTIVE as a large multisite trial and calls its training effects on cognitive abilities strong. Table 3 reports significant effects relative to controls for memory, reasoning, and speed training on their respective cognitive outcomes. The Comment also says improvements were specific to the cognitive ability trained. (LLM, conf=0.91)
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“No transfer effects were observed on performance-based measures of everyday problem solving or everyday speed of processing.”
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Willis et al., 2006 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Performance-Based IADL Measures section (p. 7) reports no general training effect on either performance-based measure. But it also reports a significant improvement in everyday speed of processing among participants assigned to booster training, so the unqualified claim that no transfer effects were observed is too broad. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“All older adults showed some aggregate decline in IADL, but this decline was milder in the reasoning training group.”
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Willis et al., 2006 source
Training Effects on Daily Functioning (p. 6) reports that group mean IADL difficulty improved through year 2, then function declined in all study groups. At year 5, the reasoning group reported significantly less IADL difficulty than the control group, supporting the claim about a milder aggregate decline in that group. (LLM, conf=0.91)
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Clinical-radiologic studies have shown that the volumes of selected brain regions are associated with specific occupational experiences (Maguire et al., 2000; Sluing et al., 2002) and increase following new learning activities (Draganski et al., 2004, 2006).”
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Maguire et al., 2000 source
Maguire et al. is cited for the occupational-experience part of the sentence, not the separate claim about increases following new learning. The Results report greater posterior hippocampal volume in taxi drivers than in controls, and the Discussion associates that difference with the drivers’ professional dependence on navigation. (LLM, conf=0.93)
- Not matchedcites Sluing et al., 2002
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Draganski et al., 2004, 2006
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Etnier and colleagues found a significant improvement in cognition as a function of physical-activity training. However, overall, no significant relationship was found between fitness change (or difference) and cognitive change (or difference).”
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Etnier, Nowell, Landers, and Sibley (2006) sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results report a mean cognitive effect size of 0.34 across 37 studies, significantly greater than zero (p < 0.001), supporting the reported cognitive improvement. The Discussion finds no significant fitness–cognition relationship for cross-sectional or posttest comparisons, but the pre-post Results find a significant negative relationship between fitness change and cognitive change. Thus, saying there was no significant relationship overall omits an important exception. (LLM, conf=0.92)
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Other researchers have reported exercise-related increased productions of other neurotrophic factors such as insulin-like growth factor 1 and vascular endothelial growth factor, which have been linked with angiogenesis (the growth of new vasculature) and neurogenesis”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Ding et al., 2004 source
- Partly supportedcites Trejo, Carro, & Torres-Aleman, 2001 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The paper reports that exercise increases uptake of circulating IGF-I into the brain and that IGF-I is necessary for exercise-induced increases in new hippocampal neurons (opening section and Discussion; page numbers unavailable). It does not report increased production of IGF-I, or address VEGF or angiogenesis. Thus it supports the IGF-I–neurogenesis link, but not the full claim. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“individual differences in this trait complex are relatively stable throughout adulthood and old age, although recent literature suggests that there are some individual differences in change in psychological distress”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Allemand, Zimprich, & Hertzog, 2007 source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Mroczek & Spiro, 2003 source
- Supportedcites Terracciano, McCrae, & Costa, 2006 source
The Results report that 67%–86% of variance across the personality scales was stable over the study, supporting relative stability in individual differences. The Random Effects section also reports significant variation in individual change slopes for seven scales, and the paper identifies Emotional Stability and Objectivity as scales inversely related to neuroticism (Fixed Effects). No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“although the extant literature provides some clues concerning the molecular and cellular pathways that support the interactive effects of different factors, much remains to be discovered in further research on multimodal interventions”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Gobbo & O'Mara, 2006
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Partly supportedcites Kempermann, 2008 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The paper distinguishes the cellular effects of physical and cognitive activity on adult hippocampal neurogenesis (A synthesis of nonspecific and specific regulatory mechanisms, p. 4). It identifies possible mediators, including GABA and neurotrophic factors, while saying that some mechanisms remain unknown (The cellular representation of the neurogenic reserve in the adult hippocampus, p. 5). It does not directly address molecular pathways in multimodal interventions generally, so the claim extends beyond the paper’s scope. (LLM, conf=0.84)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Wolf et al., 2006 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“When an individual's stress increases, his or her working-memory performance decreases; conversely, when an individual's stress level is lowered, working-memory performance improves.”
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Sliwinski et al., 2006 source
The Abstract reports that, within individuals, responses on a 2-back working-memory task were slower on high-stress days than on low-stress days. The Discussion likewise describes worse performance on high-stress days. The finding is a day-to-day association, not a test of an intervention to lower stress. (LLM, conf=0.91)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Some previous studies have adopted what might be termed an inoculation or vaccination model. That is, a single ''dose'' of an intervention is provided, occasionally followed by a small number of refresher doses (e.g., Ball et al., 2002; Willis et al., 2006).”
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Ball et al., 2002 source
The Study Design section describes one initial 10-session intervention for each training group, with booster training given to a random subsample. The Interventions section says those sessions took place over 5–6 weeks. Thus the paper fits the cited example of an initial intervention course sometimes followed by refreshers; a “dose” here means a course, not a single session. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)
- Supportedcites Willis et al., 2006 source
The Interventions section (pp. 3–4) describes one initial course of 10 training sessions, with booster training at 11 and 35 months for a selected subset. That supports citing this study as an example of an initial intervention sometimes followed by a small number of refresher rounds; “inoculation or vaccination model” is the citing authors’ characterization. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Recent neuroscience research on this topic indicates that exercise has substantial effects on brain morphology and function”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the available evidence suggests that older adults effectively employ specific knowledge and expertise and can gain new knowledge when it is required.”
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The early training literature suggested little transfer of function from specifically trained skills to new cognitive tasks; learning was highly specific to the cognitive processes targeted by training.”
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Although biological aging puts increasingly severe constraints on maximal levels of cognitive performance with advancing age, performance can still be improved in very old persons”
What the sources say
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“older chess players show inferior spatial working memory for pieces randomly placed on a chess board but relatively spared memory for locations of pieces that are part of well-learned schemata involving standard chess-game sequences”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Charness, 1981
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the vast majority of training studies implemented so far has been restricted to less than 10 sessions of training. Relative to a lifetime of experience, this is definitely a low-dosage treatment.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The meta-analyses have also begun to suggest some important moderators of the physicalactivity-cognition relationship, including the age of the participants, the type of cognitive processes assessed, the length of the training sessions, and the gender of partipants.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although the majority of these studies are relatively short-term, they do suggest benefits, with regard to maintenance of cognition and delay of dementia, when older adults pursue physical activities.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Jopp and Hertzog (2008), for instance, considered the content coverage of the Hultsch et al. (1993) questionnaire in the social-activity and physical-activity domains to be limited, and added items targeting these facets”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Jopp and Hertzog, 2008
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Hultsch et al., 1993 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“there are interesting measurement issues with these self-reports, because frequency estimation is a fallible process and the multiple-item scales do not encourage the kind of thoughtful reconstruction that maximizes validity of the self-reports (e.g., Jobe & Mingay, 1991).”
What the sources say
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Studies with interesting biological covariates are often limited in terms of cognitive measurements or scaling of activities; studies measuring potential biological mechanisms are often hampered by inadequate instrumentation of cognition and activities.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“At present we know more about what can be done to create short-term gain in older populations than we do about effective interventions at earlier points in the life span.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Most of the epidemiological research has focused on effects of neuroticism and related constructs, showing definite relationships of low neuroticism with enrichment effects.”
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Constructs like conscientiousness, goal-setting, and implementation behaviors have been shown to predict exercise behavior in older and younger adults, but these variables have typically not been incorporated into studies of cognitive-enrichment effects in old age.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“For example, Nintendo has been quite successful in promoting their cognitive- and braintraining software packages such as Brain Age and Brain Age 2 (the Web site http://www.sharpbrains.com/ provides a description and discussion of brain-training software, as well as a market report for these software products).”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites http://www.sharpbrains.com/
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“But other aspects of attitudes and beliefs that foster maintenance of an active lifestyle, particularly with respect to adaptation to loss or life stress, have received little attention.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A major issue at present is that businesses and entrepreneurs are moving aggressively to market products allegedly able to preserve the mind and the brain.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“it is clear that both younger and older adults benefit from practice and training, although not always to the same extent.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Furthermore, we have little understanding of the potential common or separate mechanisms that support different lifestyle choices (or interventions).”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although research evaluating specific mediating mechanisms for enrichment effects (e.g., exercise interventions) has been done, little attention has been paid to the idea of including measures of possible mediators in prospective longitudinal studies.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As noted earlier, too little is known also about the extent to which personality traits, positive attitudes, and positive beliefs foster healthy lifestyles that facilitate cognitive enrichment.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The chief reason for this statement is that there has been relatively little work on the practical long-term benefits of enrichment.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In this regard, little attention has yet been paid to the issue of skills training relevant to cognitive self-management in everyday life.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“The proportion of older individuals living in computerized households is increasing steadily, offering novel opportunities for cognitive training even as those households supply levels of support tailored to the level of an individual's functioning that would have seemed impossible just a few years ago.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Pew & Van Hamel, 2004
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Clearly, what we do not know still exceeds what we do know.”
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“the proportion of older adults in the United States and other industrial nations continues to grow (e.g., Martin & Preston, 1994).”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Martin & Preston, 1994
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“This perspective recognizes that there are both gains and losses in cognitive function across adulthood but that, with advancing age, gains become less common and losses predominate.”
What the sources say
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“overall, the available evidence suggests that activities can postpone decline, attenuate decline, or provide prosthetic benefit in the face of normative cognitive decline”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Movement up or down within this range of possible performance can be considered a form of behavioral plasticity that is continuously reshaped by the individual's environmental context, biological state, health, and cognitionrelevant behaviors”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Denney, 1984 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Individuals possess at least some plasticity, this plasticity can be influenced by multiple factors, and its upper limits change with age.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“individual differences in the shape of the upper and lower limits would be expected.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“any one individual cannot develop knowledge and expertise in all domains, given the vast amounts of knowledge available in modern society and the fact that knowledge acquisition consumes finite resources of available energy and time.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For individuals with prior knowledge and experience, improvements or maintenance in performance may build upon the scaffold of prior experience in ways that not only enable superior performance, relative to one with minimal relevant experience, but also create a higher probability of maintenance or improvement in cognitive function.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Cognitive function is influenced by the extent to which individuals develop relevant knowledge and expertise for and in a given cognitive domain.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the shape of this region of possible development will differ among individuals, given different genetic profiles, prenatal environments, and other factors known to influence the shape of developmental change.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“a number of variables can influence more or less optimal changes during adulthood.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Individuals possess at least some plasticity, this plasticity can be influenced by multiple factors, and its upper limits change with age.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the cumulative effects of experience and knowledge on cognition are not all positive.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“aging affects cognition through cognitive-resource limitations or through data-quality limitations that degrade cognitive operations.”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Norman & Bobrow, 1975 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For individuals without prior relevant knowledge, efforts to learn new information in a domain may lead to substantial improvements in performance relevant to that domain, though at comparably low levels of overall proficiency.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Cognitive function is influenced by the extent to which individuals develop relevant knowledge and expertise for and in a given cognitive domain.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Almost inevitably, new learning builds on the scaffold of what is already known.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Cognitive function is influenced by the extent to which individuals develop relevant knowledge and expertise for and in a given cognitive domain.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“All of these variables, if effective, are associated with functional, anatomical, or chemical changes in the brain”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“individuals are selected into particular contexts and create unique developmental histories”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Baltes & Baltes, 1990
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“cognitive enrichment can in principle be influenced by a large number of variables”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Individuals possess at least some plasticity, this plasticity can be influenced by multiple factors, and its upper limits change with age.
In the paper
“individuals' lifelong patterns of investment and efforts in particular domains construct idiosyncratic profiles of experience and expertise that are relevant to effective cognitive functioning (e.g., Cianciolo et al., 2006) and that set limits for potential improvement.”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Cianciolo et al., 2006 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Cognitive function is influenced by the extent to which individuals develop relevant knowledge and expertise for and in a given cognitive domain.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“biological changes affecting the brain lead to less effective or efficient execution of cognitive, perceptual, and sensory aspects of information processing.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“physical exercise and cognitive training can improve cognitive development over the adult life course.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Individuals possess at least some plasticity, this plasticity can be influenced by multiple factors, and its upper limits change with age.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The top end of this range of functioning is limited by optimal gene-environment fits and by the joint forces of maturation, learning, and senescence.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These aspects typically interact to govern task performance; and these interactions influence observed age differences in task performance.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“cognitive mechanisms that are exercised can be maintained or improved during adulthood.”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Baltes & Willis, 1977
- Not matchedcites Willis, 1996
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Individuals possess at least some plasticity, this plasticity can be influenced by multiple factors, and its upper limits change with age.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“knowledge plays a critical role in activities such as reading comprehension, reasoning about possible actions in social contexts, and learning new information”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hertzog, Dunlosky, & Robinson, 2008
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Stine-Morrow, Miller, & Hertzog, 2006 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Cognitive function is influenced by the extent to which individuals develop relevant knowledge and expertise for and in a given cognitive domain.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Biological-aging change will shrink the level of maximum achievable levels of performance, and it will also dampen performance when individuals operate at less than their maximum possible level of effectiveness.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“growth in relevant knowledge and expertise matters for most forms of cognition as they are used in everyday life, creating a possibility for optimization of cognitive function, irrespective of whether the basic mechanisms themselves can be trained or improved.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearIt may state two separate claims as one.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Cognitive function is influenced by the extent to which individuals develop relevant knowledge and expertise for and in a given cognitive domain.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“performance on cognitive tasks in both laboratory and naturalistic settings can vary for an individual depending on a variety of contextual factors and personal attributes.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Cognitive resources are best conceptualized as functional capacity created by the interaction between cognitive-processing efficiency and task-relevant knowledge”
What the sources say
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“one must be selective, and this implies that plasticity, as defined earlier, will operate in many domains where one does not function optimally and in a few domains where one does, as a function of investment of time and effort to master relevant information.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Individuals possess at least some plasticity, this plasticity can be influenced by multiple factors, and its upper limits change with age.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Nevertheless, they convey the idea that the developmental trajectory of cognition in adulthood is not necessarily fixed but can, in principle, be influenced and shaped by events and behaviors.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“For instance, Edelman's (1987) theory of neuronal group selection states that variants of neuronal circuits are constantly generated and selected during an organism's development to assure adaptive behavior in the ecology.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Edelman, 1987
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Individuals may differ in preferred strategies or cognitive styles, but they can shift strategies if contextual demands and constraints require them to”
What the sources say
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“At the same time, enrichment effects could, in principle, act to alter the observed course of cognitive development even when aging constrains the levels of theoretical maximal performance.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The possibility that Curve C could cross Curve B, even in old age, suggests that efforts to enrich cognition could have substantial impact, even in midlife.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“It is helpful to think of the brain as a substrate that affords cognitive plasticity, and as such is influenced by the behaviors of an individual (Cacioppo et al., 2003; Lerner, 1984).”
What the sources say
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Given these principles, the core argument is that the life course of the individual is forged from experience and choice (Stine-Morrow, 2007) and that this has consequences for the structure and function of cognition and its neuronal substrate.”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Stine-Morrow, 2007 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes? Checkable: unclear✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Individuals' neurobiological status is influenced by their social context and personal behavior, and vice versa.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“These compensatory goaldirected actions are a form of adaptive self-regulation and intentional self-development (e.g., Brandtsta ¨dter, 2006; Carver & Scheier, 1998; Riediger, Li, & Lindenberger, 2006), as they require monitoring of current cognitive states, performance outcomes, and flexible strategic choice (Hertzog & Robinson, 2005; Nelson & Narens, 1990; Stine-Morrow et al., 2”
What the sources say
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“If the enrichment effect operates on specific psychological mechanisms, its impact may be narrow. If the enrichment effect operates at the level of general improvements of the functioning of entire neural circuits or the biochemical substrates that serve cognition more generally (e.g., changes in circulating hormone levels or neurotrophic factors), then the effects could be relatively general.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Conversely, psychological stress and loneliness can have profound negative effects on brain structure and function (Cacioppo, Hughes, Waite, Hawkley, & Thisted, 2006; McEwen, 2002; Sapolsky, 1992).”
What the sources say
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In general, an individual's realized developmental pathway is cumulative, inevitably building on what has happened before, but it also contains the potential for discontinuity in the positive direction (as in Curve C) given a discontinuous increase in cognition-enriching behaviors or environmental influences.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“At later ages, the level of cognitive function is influenced by the prior level of function (given the accumulated cognitive history) and the variables that operate to determine cognition in the intervening time period.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“If sustained efforts to maintain maximal performance lag, high performers can be expected to regress back toward their own average. By implication, the lag in effort will cause high performers to become more like their more average peers (see Fig. 1).”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As will become evident in the course of this review, some enrichment effects appear to operate predominantly at the skill level, whereas others also operate at the ability level.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These group differences in performance may not be due solely to the effects of activity, and the variables that actually govern the differences could overshadow or interact with activity differences in the course of aging to produce or obscure cross-sectional differences in activity subgroups.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“As in any statistical application, accepting the null hypothesis (in this case, a null hypothesis of no interaction) should be understood as being distinct from a failure to reject it (Cohen, 1994).”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Cohen, 1994 source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Recent research argues that most people with mild cognitive impairment will eventually develop dementia, indicating that many people with major cognitive decline in old age may be showing preclinical symptoms of a dementing illness (Albert, Blacker, Moss, Tanzi, & McArdle, 2007; Lopez, Li, Shing, & Lindenberger, 2007; Petersen et al., 2006).”
What the sources say
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“The methodological problems encountered in evaluating explanatory hypotheses about adult development are formidable (e.g, Baltes, Reese, & Nesselroade, 1988; Hertzog & Dixon, 1996; Nesselroade & Labouvie, 1985).”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Baltes, Reese, & Nesselroade, 1988
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Hertzog & Dixon, 1996
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Nesselroade & Labouvie, 1985
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Not matched
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Self-reported activities may be particularly susceptible to age/cohort differences and to individual differences in standards for reporting activities or judging frequency of activities.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Hertzog (in press) argues that differential volunteering in midlife, combined with selection artifacts in old age due to morbidity and mortality effects, could produce parallel cognitive functions for different levels of activity in cross-sectional data, even when the actual function is a Cognition -Activity interaction.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hertzog (in press)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Moreover, these differences between types of enrichment are modulated by differences between individuals.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“However, plasticity during sensitive periods differs in important ways from plasticity before and after such periods (cf. Hensch, 2004; Knudsen, 2002), and it may often require sustained efforts to be maintained.”
What the sources say
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“But the problems are especially difficult when it comes to cognitive enrichment, because the hypothesis entails that changes in cognition over the life course will be affected by individuals' lifestyle and behavior.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A large number of statistical approaches are available, and different studies often employ very different methods, rendering comparisons of results difficult.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The critical methodological issues, therefore, are the extent to which individuals differentially benefit from practice and whether these individual differences are related to person-specific attributes.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Intervention studies are not immune to issues about causal inference, in part because assignment to conditions cannot always be fully randomized and because of internal validity threats like imitation of treatments-in which individuals assigned to the control group spontaneously behave as if they were in the intervention (Shadish et al., 2002).”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Shadish et al., 2002
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Much of the epidemiological evidence is based on random-effects (multilevel) regression analysis for examining predictors of longitudinal change.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Intervention studies offer a more controlled way to assess cognitive-enrichment effects, because assignment of individuals to treatments, and the treatments themselves, are under experimental control.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Unfortunately, we currently know relatively little about the behavior of these statistical models and whether they can actually recover effects that exist, or whether and when they are susceptible to erroneous inferences about how one variable influences another, and vice versa.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“One problem with such studies is that different aspects of lifestyle may be more or less amenable to intervention. Compliance with an exercise program may be easier to implement, measure, and validate than compliance with a regimen of performing intellectually engaging activities such as reading or doing crossword puzzles.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The relevance of intervention studies for the cognitive-enrichment hypothesis has also been called into question because maintenance is rarely assessed beyond 1 or 2 years following the end of the intervention (e.g., Salthouse, 2006).”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Salthouse, 2006 source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As implied in Figure 2, plasticity is not a one-way street, and performance may start relapsing to preintervention levels (e.g., display negative plasticity) as soon as intervention activities are given up.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Clearly, older adults learned (achieving maximal or asymptotic RT) much more slowly than the younger adults. Nevertheless, they did achieve asymptotic performance.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hertzog et al., 1996
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Assessing practice effects inside a longitudinal design is in and of itself a difficult modeling exercise that requires a number of assumptions, because longitudinal designs explicitly targeting practice effects are rarely employed (see Baltes et al., 1988; McArdle & Woodcock, 1997).”
What the sources say
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Furthermore age differences in rates of visual search are larger for these experts when they are searching for novel stimuli than they are when they are searching for familiar, expertise-related stimuli.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe quote only partly states this claim.
In the paper
“However, one should not necessarily conclude from such studies that skill acquisition is impossible for older adults. Often, it is merely more difficult and time consuming (Li et al., 2008).”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Li et al., 2008
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“With respect to causal inference about activity affecting cognition, dynamic modeling of causal influences of variables on one another, as in Hamagami and McArdle's (2007) dynamic dual change score models (e.g., Lo ¨vde ´n, Ghisletta, & Lindenberger, 2005), may help to attenuate these ambiguities.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hamagami & McArdle, 2007
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Lo ¨vde ´n, Ghisletta, & Lindenberger, 2005
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Second, however, practice and training resulted in a close-to-perfect separation of the two age groups, thereby demonstrating the existence of sizable negative age differences at limits of functioning.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These findings confirm that cognitive training does show substantial benefits for older adults and that these effects can be relatively long lasting.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Referring back to our theoretical framework (Fig. 1), upward movements in the zone of possible cognitive performance are possible, even if such movements become more difficult with advancing age.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Taken together, the first two generations of cognitive-intervention studies demonstrated that healthy older adults are able to improve levels of performance to a greater extent than previously assumed and that negative adult age differences often are magnified (increased) rather than diminished when adults of different ages are assessed near asymptotic levels of performance.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Second, older adults maintain previously learned skills as they practice them, and they can often gain new skills even if their rate of skill acquisition is slowed.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In a comprehensive review of the neuroanatomical literature, Raz (2000) reported average linear reductions in brain weight and volume, of about 2%perdecade during adulthood, that were more pronounced for anterior parts of the brain.”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Raz, 2000
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“older adults are capable of developing and transferring efficient and effective attentional-control skills.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe quote only partly states this claim.
In the paper
“Bissig and Lustig (2007) showed that benefit from the recollection-training paradigm was associated with increases in the time spent encoding the target list; they argued that participants were learning to encode distinctive details and then search for those details at test to avoid being lured by repeated foils.”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Bissig & Lustig, 2007 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Both younger and older adults improved on the practiced task. Transfer to another working-memory task requiring continuous updating was reliable in younger adults but not in older adults.”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Dahlin, Stigsdotter-Neely, Larsson, Ba ¨ckman, and Nyberg, 2008 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“investigators have argued for separating socioeconomic status from the construct of mentally stimulating activity (Hertzog et al., 1999).”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Hertzog et al., 1999 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Other studies have found that the coordination of different regions within the prefrontal cortex, as well as the coordination of prefrontal with posterior brain regions, is disrupted in older adults (AndrewsHanna et al., 2007; Colcombe et al., 2005).”
What the sources say
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Task-specific training effects were reliable for all age groups. In addition, Karbach and Kray (in press) observed robust transfer effects to verbal working memory, spatial working memory, and reasoning in all age groups, with effect sizes around 0.3.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Karbach & Kray, in press
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Situations deemed to be particularly dependent upon prefrontal circuitry require the coordination of multiple tasks or task components.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“the authors found near transfer to a more demanding spatial n -back task and to numerical n -back performance, and 3-month maintenance of practice gains and near-transfer effects, with decrements relative to post-practice performance among older but not younger adults. No evidence for far transfer to more complex working-memory tasks was found.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Li et al., 2008
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“older adults in the variable-priority training group, as compared to individuals trained with fixed priorities, showed faster rates of acquisition of dual-task performance, higher levels of mastery on the trained dual tasks, higher levels of retention after 2 months, and, most importantly, better transfer to novel dual tasks”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Kramer, Larish, et al., 1995, 1999
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Bherer et al., 2005 source
- Not matchedcites Erickson, Colcombe, Wadhwa, et al., 2007
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Dunlosky et al. (2003) showed an incremental-training benefit for combining selftesting training with strategy training, but self-testing training did not increase the likelihood of transfer of self-testing to a different memory task.”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Dunlosky, Kubat-Silman, and Hertzog, 2003 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Verhaeghen, Steitz, Sliwinski, and Cerella (2003) concluded that evidence exists for a specific agerelated difference in dual-task response latency costs over and above age-related general slowing.”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Verhaeghen, Steitz, Sliwinski, and Cerella, 2003 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“higher level of Alzheimer's disease pathology, as indicated by a composite index of cortical plaques and neurofibrillary tangles from five brain regions, was associated with lower level of cognitive function proximate to death. The size of this correlation was reduced, however, as level of education increased.”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Bennett et al., 2003 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“cognitive decline began earlier in those with low education (blue line) compared to those with high education (green line), but once decline began, the rate was faster in the higheducation subgroup than in the low-education subgroup.”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Hall et al., 2007 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“a retrospective measure of cognitive activity prior to old age was related to risk of Alzheimer's disease, but the association was eliminated after controlling for late-life cognitive activity, and more frequent late-life cognitive activity was associated with reduced risk of Alzheimer's disease even after controlling for previous level of cognitive activity and indicators of socioeconomic status”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Wilson, Scherr, et al., 2007 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“level of cognitive activity has long-term predictive validity for the incidence of dementia, including prospective prediction over a 2-decade span in one study (Crowe et al., 2003).”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Crowe et al., 2003 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although the preponderance of evidence indicates that older people who are more mentally active are less likely to develop dementia or experience cognitive decline than their less mentally active counterparts”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These findings are important because they suggest that mentally stimulating activity compresses morbidity by delaying the onset of cognitive decline and subsequently accelerating its course, thereby reducing the proportion of old age spent in a cognitively disabled state.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“There was no association between a measure of cognitive activity and change in cognitive function, but the cognitive-activity measure was based on a single activity in which less than 15% participated (i.e., attending a course or study), and this may have limited the ability to detect an association with subsequent rate of cognitive decline.”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Aartsen, Smits, van Tilburg, Knipscheer, & Deeg, 2002 source
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“level of participation in cognitive activities does appear to decline somewhat in old age (Hultsch et al., 1999; Wilson, Scherr, et al., 2007) and is undoubtedly reduced in persons with manifest dementia.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hultsch et al., 1999
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Wilson, Scherr, et al., 2007 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Salthouse (2006) found Age -Activity interactions in his cross-sectional data set for verbal ability, consistent with acculturation and knowledge-acquisition effects.”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Salthouse, 2006 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Therefore, increased physical activity and exercise might be expected to maintain cognition through reduced risk of diseases associated with cognitive decline.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Hertzog et al. (2006) showed that power to detect individual differences in change is dramatically affected by growth-curve reliability, which in turn is influenced by measurement reliability.”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Hertzog, Lindenberger, Ghisletta, & von Oertzen, 2006 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In sum, the available longitudinal evidence supports the argument that engaging in mentally stimulating activities during adulthood is associated with less cognitive decline and a reduced incidence of mild cognitive impairment and dementia.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Greater participation in cognitive activities was associated with a reduced risk of Alzheimer's disease 20 years later, although the association in this small cohort was only significant for women.”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Crowe et al., 2003 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“retrospective estimates of early-life cognitive activity and indicators of early-life socioeconomic status are positively correlated with late-life level of cognitive activity, but the associations are far from perfect (Wilson, Barnes, Krueger, et al., 2005).”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Wilson, Barnes, Krueger, et al., 2005 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Given these results, one might expect that improved cardiorespiratory function and tissue oxygenation, especially in older adults who show declines in these functions, will result in improvements in cognition.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“higher level of premorbid reading, assessed by retrospective informant report, was associated with more rapid decline in verbal cognitive ability but not nonverbal cognitive ability.”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Wilson et al., 2000 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This suggests that cognitive activity may help maintain efficiency in neural systems that support memory and cognition, thereby enhancing adaptation to age-related pathologic changes.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“More frequent cognitive activity was associated with a reduced risk of developing dementia during up to 20 years of follow-up. This association remained even after excluding people whose dementia developed during the first 7 years of observation”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Verghese et al., 2003 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“this leads to the prediction that among those with clinically manifest dementia or cognitive impairment, persons with a higher level of education/ premorbid cognitive activity ought to experience more rapid cognitive decline than less educated/active persons.”
Tests✗ Asserted: fails✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true.
In the paper
“A moderate effect size (.48) for fitness training was obtained in the analysis.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Colcombe and Kramer (2003)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe quote only partly states this claim.
- Not matched
In the paper
“whereas a significant inverse relationship was observed for the objective fitness measures and cognitive decline, this was not the case for the self-report activity measures.”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Barnes, Yaffe, Satariano, and Tager (2003) source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Given the physical-activity component of enriched environments, it would appear conceivable that exercise and physical activity may be responsible, in part, for a subset of the reported brain changes.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“These data suggest little memory protection for those who stopped exercise after age 36 but protection for those individuals who began exercise after this time.”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Richards, Hardy, and Wadsworth (2003) source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A significant relationship between energy expended in physical activities and cognition, across a large set of cognitive measures, was observed, and this relationship remained significant after adjusting for medical conditions, prescription drugs, and lifestyle factors”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Weuve et al. (2004)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
- Not matched
In the paper
“24% of the women in the least-active quartile showed cognitive decline, as compared to 17% of the women in the most-active quartile, a reduction in risk of cognitive decline of approximately 30%.”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Yaffe et al. (2001) source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Relative to participants in the nonaerobic control group, those in the aerobic-training group showed selective improvements in a number of aspects of cognition, including the ability to selectively process task-relevant information and ignore task-irrelevant information, the ability to abort a preprogrammed response, and the ability to rapidly switch between multiple tasks.”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Kramer, Hahn, Cohen, et al. (1999) source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“it is conceivable that it is the aerobic aspects of the physical activities-which are more reliably indexed by the objective than self-report measures-that is more strongly related to spared cognition than is those activities' nonaerobic aspects.”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Barnes et al. (2003) source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“voluntary running increased BDNF gene expression in the hippocampus.”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Neeper et al., 1995 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe quote only partly states this claim.
In the paper
“the administration of estradiol increased estrogen to levels observed prior to surgery, and it increased voluntary running.”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Berchtold, Kesslak, Pike, Adlard, and Cotman (2001) source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“cell proliferation in the dentate gyrus, the relatively narrow input structure to the hippocampus proper, was related to improved performance on the Morris water-maze task (a test of spatial learning and memory) and enhancement of long-term potentiation, a cellular model of learning and memory.”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Van Praag, Kempermann, and Gage (1999) source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“This interesting finding not only indicates that multiple lifestyle factors can have interactive effects on the brain and cognition in old age, but also may help explain the finding that studies with more female participants show larger effects of exercise.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Erickson et al. (2007)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“these data suggest that BDNF, an important neuroprotective molecule, can be influenced by estrogen and exercise both separately and in combination-which may help explain the within- and between-gender effects on the exercise-cognition relationship reported in the human literature.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Findings from animal models of exercise, neurogenesis, neurotrophic factors, and distress can be extrapolated to human cognitive aging.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The changes engendered by enriched environments include increased dendritic branching, capillary development, the development of new neurons from adult stem cells, enhanced learning and memory, as well as a cascade of molecular and neurochemical changes”
What the sources say
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“more frequent contact with children and friends and being satisfied with these contacts were each related to reduced risk of dementia.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Wang et al., 2002
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“exercise increases levels of neurotrophic factors that have been shown to be neuroprotective, to enhance cell and neuron growth, and to engender synaptic plasticity”
What the sources say
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Interestingly while walking distance was related to cognition, walking speed was not.”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Yaffe et al. (2001) source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“stability more than change is the rule, with 6-year test-retest correlations approaching a perfect correlation of 1.0 in some studies”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Costa & McCrae, 1998
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“A more recent study found no association between social-network size and dementia risk, but feeling lonely was related to increased incidence of dementia even after controlling for social-network size and frequency of social activity”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Wilson, Krueger, et al., 2007 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Levels of participation in social activities predicted the rate of decline in perceptual speed, but initial levels of perceptual speed did not predict change in social-activity participation.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Lo ¨ vde ´ n et al. (2005)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Midlife engagement did not predict dementia, but individuals who experienced a downward shift in engagement from midlife to old age were more likely to develop dementia than were those who had consistently high engagement.”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Saczynski et al. (2006) source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“one study found a high level of neuroticism (solid line) to be associated with a nearly tenfold increase in annual rate of episodic-memory decline compared to a low level of the trait (dotted line) but to be unrelated to decline in other cognitive domains”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Wilson, Evans, et al., 2003 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“their results indicated domain-specific measures of memory selfefficacy were correlated with activities and also with cognitive performance, as measured by a number of different intellectualability and memory tests.”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Jopp and Hertzog (2007) source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“attitudes about aging and stereotypes about age-related decline in cognition could influence the changes in perceived memory ability.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Such findings suggest that longitudinal changes in cognition could be associated with prior self-efficacy beliefs.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“To our knowledge, no one has evaluated the domain-specific beliefs about control over different kinds of activities, and how those beliefs might change as a function of age-associated disease or disability.”
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“controlling for neuroticism substantially reduces the association of depressive symptoms with loss of cognition (Wilson, Schneider, et al., 2007), supporting the idea that depressive symptomatology predicts cognitive decline because it is a proxy for chronic psychological distress.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Wilson, Schneider, et al., 2007
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Bandura and his colleagues emphasize that self-efficacy is grounded in the specific performance context one evaluates, and they measure self-efficacy with scales designed to assess the likelihood of achieving a goal in a particular context.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Bandura and his colleagues
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although the weight of epidemiologic evidence supports an association between neuroticism and depressive symptomatology on the one hand and cognitive decline and dementia on the other, the basis of the association is uncertain.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Timmer and Aartsen (2003) reported that general self-efficacy beliefs were associated with self-reported activities.”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Timmer and Aartsen (2003) source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“measures of neuroticism and depressive symptoms were not associated with composite measures of amyloid plaques, neurofibrillary tangles, Lewy bodies, or cerebral infarction but were related to cognitive function and dementia proximate to death even after controlling for these neuropathologic features”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Wilson, Arnold, Schneider, Li, & Bennett, 2007
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The evidence for positive effects of attitudes and beliefs on adult cognition is much more limited and spotty.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearThe quote only partly states this claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These changes, when extreme, might actually be sufficient to cause dementia, but it is more likely that they contribute to cognitive impairment and thereby increase the likelihood that other common age-related neuropathologies are clinically expressed as dementia.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Bandura (1997) argues that persons high in self-efficacy are low in performance anxiety, are more strategic in their efforts to achieve goals, and are more persistent in goal pursuit when faced with adversity or complicating circumstances.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Bandura (1997)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“they include reduced dendritic branching and synaptic density, downregulation of glucocorticoid receptors, reduced expression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor and its tyrosine kinase B receptor, and reduced neurogenesis in the dentate gyrus, with accompanying impairments in learning and memory”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Herman, Adams, & Prewitt, 1995
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Magarinos & McEwen, 1995
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Radley et al., 2004 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“growing older causes both changes in memory and changes in memory beliefs, but the changes in memory beliefs neither cause nor result from changes in memory.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Jopp and Hertzog (2007) found that belief in personal control over memory was positively correlated with self-reported activities and with cognition.”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Jopp and Hertzog (2007) source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Both the antioxidant-diet and enriched-environment groups displayed a number of benefits in learning in memory”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Milgram et al. (2005)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“studies vary in the quality of their assessment of cognition, the representativeness of their samples, and their ability to control for rival hypotheses.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“clearly a disadvantage of such an approach is that it may miss the potential power of interactions for maintaining and enhancing cognition.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the great majority of laboratory studies of factors that influence the level and trajectories of cognitive function focus on single factors.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Research on resilience under stress suggests that maintaining positive affect and attitude in the face of adversity can help one adapt to negative life events (Zautra, 2003).”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Zautra, 2003
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“theorists have argued that individuals who are optimistic, agreeable, open to experience, conscientious, positively motivated, and goal-directed are more likely to experience successful aging, to take advantage of opportunities, to cope more effectively with life circumstances, to effectively regulate emotional reactions to events, and to maintain a sense of well-being and life satisfaction in the”
What the sources say
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✗ Asserted: fails✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Wilson and colleagues (Wilson, Mendes de Leon, et al., 2002; Wilson, Bennett, et al., 2002) reported that while participation in cognitive activities (such as reading, listening to the radio, playing games) reduced the risk of succumbing to Alzheimer's disease, participation in physical activities (such as jogging, gardening, bicycle riding, dancing) was unrelated to the development of Alzheimer's”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Wilson, Mendes de Leon, et al., 2002
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Wilson, Bennett, et al., 2002
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Verghese et al., 2006 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Richards et al. (2003) reported that physical activity at 36 years of age was associated with a slower rate of decline in memory from 43 to 53 years of age and that this relationship was unchanged after adjusting for cognitive activities.”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Richards et al. (2003) source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“After two months of the interventions, the regular-diet/exercise group was found to show the fastest spatial learning on the Morris Water Maze task, followed by the regular-diet/sedentary and high-fat/exercise groups, with the high-fat/sedentary group showing the poorest learning.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Molteni et al. (2004)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“this approach also has the potential to decompose the relative benefits of different factors and their potential mechanisms.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“They argue that most leisure activities engage some combination of these three types of demands.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Karp and colleagues (2006)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“this could be the result of several factors, including the following: (a) Rarely are physical activities characterized in terms of intensity, frequency, and duration; (b) the period across which activities are assessed has been different for cognitive and physical activities; (c) with one exception, activities have been treated as unidimensional in nature.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“After adjusting for a variety of covariates, social, cognitive, and physical activities were each found to be associated with a reduced risk for dementia.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Karp and colleagues (2006)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Subjects in the healthy-lifestyle group, which included a healthy diet, physical exercise, relaxation training, and memory training, showed improvements in verbal fluency and decreases in activation in the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex as assessed via positron emission tomography.”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Small et al. (2006) source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“We certainly agree with Salthouse (2006) that more evidence is needed to cement the case for enrichment effects”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Salthouse (2006) source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Exercise and environmental enrichment lead to cell proliferation in critical areas of the central nervous system (CNS), including the dentate gyrus of the hippocampus, but they also promote a variety of positive changes in CNS function, including angiogenesis, synaptic growth, increased production of neurotrophins, and other forms of neural plasticity.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The longitudinal evidence suggesting benefits of an intellectually engaged lifestyle may be the most controversial, because enrichment effect sizes tend to be small”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is also clear that a variety of variables, such as social isolation, neuroticism, and adverse stress reactions are risk factors for cognitive decline and incipient dementia in old age.”
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The hypothesis of exercise-induced cognitive-enrichment effects is supported by longitudinal studies of predictors of cognitive decline and incidence of dementia, but also by short-term intervention studies in human and animal populations.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Findings from animal models of enriched environments and exercise generalize to human cognitive aging.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Latent-variable models can address the problem of random measurement error, but any model assessing different facets of activity from the same questionnaire inevitably includes systematic measurement-error variance in the latent variable.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“our view is that the current evidence is sufficiently strong to warrant a discussion of the implications of cognitive-enrichment effects for public policy.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The exercise-intervention work suggest relatively general cognitive benefits of aerobic exercise but indicates that cognitive tasks that require executive functioning, working memory, and attentional control are most likely to benefit.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“a number of activities including exercise or physical activity, intellectual engagement, and social engagement have shown promise in either reducing cognitive decline, delaying the onset of age-associated neurodegenerative diseases, or enhancing aspects of cognition in older adults.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Salthouse et al. (2002) actually found Age -Activity interactions for crystallized intelligence but dismissed them as acculturation effects that were not paralleled in measures of fluid intelligence, working memory, and the like.”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Salthouse et al. (2002) source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“We agree that they are subject to concerns about construct validity and contaminating influences of social desirability and self-enhancement effects.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the extant research literature raises a number of important theoretical and practical questions that provide the basis for a future research agenda.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“actual cognition in real-life contexts is critically dependent on knowledge and experience.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The literature is far from definitive, which is no surprise given the inherent difficulties in empirically testing the enrichment hypothesis.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we believe there is a strong and sound empirical basis for arguing that a variety of factors, including engaging in intellectually and mentally stimulating activities, both (a) slow rates of cognitive aging and (b) enhance levels of cognitive functioning in later life.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Recent studies have persuaded us that training cognitive- and metacognitive-control strategies produces transfer effects and are thus encouraging as interventions for cognitive enrichment.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Until recently, one would have concluded that the training literature indicates minimal transfer beyond the specific kinds of cognitive construct that is the target of training.”
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“With respect to physical exercise, one could only expect continuing benefits in those who continue to exercise, and the same may be true of mental exercise as well.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In humans, performance and brain activity on analogous tasks can be assessed to establish mechanistic connections to animal models.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Finally, as emphasized throughout this monograph, the core of the cognitive-enrichment hypothesis is longitudinal, positing beneficial effects of earlier lifestyle choices and affordances on late-life outcomes.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There is no magic pill or no one-shot vaccine that inoculates the individual against the possibility of cognitive decline in old age.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“Salthouse (2006) has claimed that one can only evaluate the benefits of mental-exercise-program interventions with verylong-term follow-up studies that show sustained and continuing benefits; one should not overgeneralize from positive results in short-term interventions.”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Salthouse, 2006 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Molecular, genetic, and histological techniques that are unethical in human populations can be used in animals to delineate the chemical and anatomical substrates of enrichment effects.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Note, also, that any reduction in or deferral of the need for assisted living, however small, would improve personal well-being and reduce health-care costs at individual and societal levels.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It seems obvious that this approach would be ineffective with physical-exercise interventions.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While such designs provide valuable insights into the strategies for cognitive enhancement, they cannot easily disambiguate cohort effects or address whether intervention strategies have meaningful long-term effects on cognitive maintenance and enhancement.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Such designs do not assess people in a way that is directly linked to the timing of critical events, so that they are measured before, during, and after critical life events (e.g., coronary infarctions, major illnesses, death of a spouse, falls, new caregiving requirements) that may have major impact on psychological function and that may lead to major changes in activity patterns and cognition.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“General claims that using a computer training program or game or solving certain kinds of puzzles will lead to enhanced brain function are difficult to prove or disprove.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A massive exercisetraining program without a sustained change in exercise behavior will have little long-term benefit.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We believe that cognitive enrichment effects accrue when an active, engaged person includes enhancing activities as part of a larger lifestyle.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Specifically, such a lifestyle may attenuate cognitive decline in late adulthood and old age, extend the ability to lead an independent life, and postpone the onset of a dementing illness.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Physical exercise can only provide benefit, in the largest sense, when it has become a regular and frequent event that is part of the lifestyle of an individual.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We do not know what the limits on interventions are, because those limits have not yet been tested.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, our society is proceeding forward as if the case is closed, and public policy will need to understand that reality and attend to it.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Arriving at this information requires experiments with random assignment to treatment and control groups, and an adequate sample description.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“At the same time, development of technologically supportive and enriching environments can raise privacy issues, as well as concerns about whether well-intentioned support and service provision would also involve loss of autonomy and personal control.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There is sufficient evidence favoring cognitiveenrichment effects to encourage these kinds of dialogues.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“advances in psychological science can make important contributions to improving the quality of life of longliving older adults, in part by empirically demonstrating that attitudes and behaviors can promote cognitive functioning in old age and, more generally, by showing how behavioral interventions can contribute to optimizing successful aging.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“wellness practices that increase longevity and vitality can do so only on a probabilistic basis.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There is undoubtedly a parallel in this emerging part of the market to alternative medicine, a history that includes failed attempts by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to regulate the marketing of herbal supplements and vitamins.”
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The authors state this as an assumption.
Individuals possess at least some plasticity, this plasticity can be influenced by multiple factors, and its upper limits change with age.
“it is useful to assume that individuals have at least some degree of plasticity, that is, potential for improvement (or decline); that this plasticity can be influenced by a number of factors; and that plasticity has upper limits that change with age.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The lower limit of the zone of possible development excludes acute pathological insult or traumatic incidents that harm cognition.
“The lower limit as drawn in Figure 1 assumes that we are ruling out acute pathological insult or traumatic incidents that harm cognition (e.g., brain injury following an automobile accident).”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The lower limit assumes a representative set of causal influences on cognition operating without producing cognitive enrichment.
“it depicts an expected minimal level of function for this individual across the life course, assuming a representative set of causal influences on cognition are operating, but in a manner that produces no cognitive enrichment.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Cognitive function is influenced by the extent to which individuals develop relevant knowledge and expertise for and in a given cognitive domain.
“Our treatment of the issue assumes that cognitive function is influenced by the extent to which individuals develop relevant knowledge and expertise for and in a given cognitive domain”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Individuals' neurobiological status is influenced by their social context and personal behavior, and vice versa.
“Another aspect of our perspective is the assumption that individuals' neurobiological status is influenced by their social context and personal behavior, and vice versa (e.g., Baltes, Reuter-Lorenz, & Ro ¨sler, 2006; Cacioppo, 2002; Li & Lindenberger, 2002).”
The paper relies on this without support.
Findings from animal models of exercise, neurogenesis, neurotrophic factors, and distress can be extrapolated to human cognitive aging.
“Extrapolating the animal data to the situation in humans, Kempermann (2008) proposes that”
“That this animal research may have relevance to humans is suggested by studies of persons with psychiatric conditions characterized by very high levels of psychological distress.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Findings from animal models of enriched environments and exercise generalize to human cognitive aging.
“The exercise-intervention studies and animal population studies provide strong corroborative evidence for enrichment effects for social and physical activities.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Self-report measures of activity validly index the relevant cognitive, physical, and social engagement for testing enrichment effects.
“One influence limiting the magnitude of effect sizes is the typical use of somewhat crude self-report measures of activities that do not scale intellectual challenge or aerobic-exercise benefits in ways that validly measure individual differences in challenge and potential benefit.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Biological aging mechanisms that influence brain functioning can only be delayed, not prevented, at least at present.
“Moreover, at least at the present time, biological-aging mechanisms that influence brain functioning can only be delayed, not prevented.”
The paper relies on this without support.
A wide range of variables can lead to cognitive decline.
“A wide range of variables can lead to cognitive decline”
The paper relies on this without support.
Physical activity can delay the onset of cognitive loss associated with dementia and normal aging.
“For instance, physical activity can delay the onset of cognitive loss associated with dementia and normal aging.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Some process-based interventions, mainly from the domain of EF, have resulted in very promising widespread transfer across the lifespan (Hertzog et al., 2008; Karbach and Schubert, 2013; Kray and Ferdinand, 2013; Titz and Karbach, 2014), suggesting that process-based training might be more efficient than strategy-based interventions.”
From Executive control training from middle childhood to adolescence (2014) · cites this paper as Hertzog et al., 2008
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Sturman study has conflicting publication years
MinorThe text cites the Sturman study as a 2006 publication, but its reference entry dates it to 2005.
“A study by Sturman et al. (2006) is particularly interesting”
“Sturman, M.T., Morris, M.C., Mendes de Leon, C.F., Bienias, J.L., Wilson, R.S., & Evans, D.A. (2005).”
Scarmeas study has conflicting publication years
MinorThe in-text citation gives 2001 for the Scarmeas, Albert, Manly, and Stern study, whereas the matching reference entry gives 2006.
“Scarmeas, Albert, Manly, & Stern, 2001”
“Scarmeas, N., Albert, S.M., Manly, J.J., & Stern, Y. (2006).”
Conflicting claims about adjustment for cognitive activity
MinorThe same discussion says the physical-activity association persisted after adjustment for cognitive activities, then says it was no longer significant after that adjustment. This reverses the stated interpretation of the result.
“After statistical adjustment for cognitive activities, each additional physical activity hour per week was associated with a slower rate of cognitive decline.”
“However, this relationship was no longer significant after adjusting for cognitive activities”
Citations
Cites
Items 401–600 of 627
Lindenberger, U., Singer, T., & Baltes, P. B. (2002) · The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences · doi:10.1093/geronb/57.6.p474 · Cited by 147
Self-citationChronic Distress, Age-Related Neuropathology, and Late-Life Dementia
Wilson, R. S., Arnold, S. E., Schneider, J. A., Li, Y., & Bennett, D. A. (2007) · Psychosomatic Medicine · doi:10.1097/01.psy.0000250264.25017.21 · Cited by 146
Self-citationLachman, M. E., & Andreoletti, C. (2006) · The Journals of Gerontology Series B · doi:10.1093/geronb/61.2.p88 · Cited by 145
Fordyce, D. E., & Farrar, R. P. (1991) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0166-4328(05)80105-6 · Cited by 143
Physical Activity, Cognitive Activity, and Cognitive Decline in a Biracial Community Population
Sturman, M. T., Morris, M. C., Mendes de Leon, C. F., Bienias, J. L., Wilson, R. S., & Evans, D. A. (2005) · Archives of Neurology · doi:10.1001/archneur.62.11.1750 · Cited by 142
Self-citationCognitive dysfunction in Alzheimer's disease.
Nebes, R. D. (1992) · Cited by 142
Influences of cognitive slowing on age differences in intelligence.
Hertzog, C. (1989) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.25.4.636 · Cited by 139
Self-citationGold, D. P., Andrés, D. P., Etezadi, J., Arbuckle, T. Y., Schwartzman, A., & Chaikelson, J. (1995) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037//0882-7974.10.2.294 · Cited by 139
Baltes, P. B., & Willis, S. L. (1982) · MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) · Cited by 138
Distress proneness and cognitive decline in a population of older persons
Wilson, R. S., Bennett, D. A., de Leon, C. F. M., Bienias, J. L., Morris, M. C., & Evans, D. A. (2004) · Psychoneuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2004.04.005 · Cited by 135
Self-citationEffects of age upon retrieval from short-term memory.
Anders, T. R., Fozard, J. L., & Lillyquist, T. D. (1972) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0032103 · Cited by 135
Resilience in Later Adulthood and Old Age: Resources and Potentials for Successful Aging
Greve, W., & Staudinger, U. M. (2015) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470939406.ch21 · Cited by 135
Modeling Age and Retest Processes in Longitudinal Studies of Cognitive Abilities.
Ferrer, E. E., Salthouse, T. A., Stewart, W. F., & Schwartz, B. S. (2004) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/0882-7974.19.2.243 · Cited by 134
Change in Cognitive Function in Older Persons From a Community Population
Wilson, R. S., Beckett, L. A., Bennett, D. A., Albert, M., & Evans, D. A. (1999) · Archives of Neurology · doi:10.1001/archneur.56.10.1274 · Cited by 133
Self-citationEducation and the course of cognitive decline in Alzheimer disease
Wilson, R. S., Li, Y., Aggarwal, N. T., Barnes, L. L., McCann, J. J., Gilley, D. W., & Evans, D. A. (2004) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000140488.65299.53 · Cited by 133
Self-citationImpact of Alzheimer's pathology on cognitive trajectories in nondemented elderly
Driscoll, I., Resnick, S. M., Troncoso, J. C., An, Y., O'Brien, R., & Zonderman, A. B. (2006) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.21031 · Cited by 132
Body mass index in older persons is associated with Alzheimer disease pathology
Buchman, A. S., Schneider, J. A., Wilson, R. S., Bienias, J. L., & Bennett, D. A. (2006) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000247046.90574.0f · Cited by 132
Self-citationPerceived self-efficacy and everyday problem solving among young and older adults.
Artistico, D., Cervone, D., & Pezzuti, L. (2003) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/0882-7974.18.1.68 · Cited by 131
Toward a Stage Theory of Adult Cognitive Development
Schaie, K. W. (1978) · The International Journal of Aging and Human Development · doi:10.2190/1tea-m6pk-28a0-49hv · Cited by 131
Tranter, L. J., & Koutstaal, W. (2008) · Aging Neuropsychology and Cognition · doi:10.1080/13825580701322163 · Cited by 130
Parkinsonianlike Signs and Risk of Incident Alzheimer Disease in Older Persons
Wilson, R. S., Schneider, J. A., Bienias, J. L., Evans, D. A., & Bennett, D. A. (2003) · Archives of Neurology · doi:10.1001/archneur.60.4.539 · Cited by 129
Self-citationOn the myth of intellectual decline in adulthood.
Horn, J. L., & Donaldson, G. W. (1976) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.31.10.701 · Cited by 129
Adult development of intellectual performance: Description, explanation, and modification.
Baltes, P. B., & Labouvie, G. V. (1973) · The psychology of adult development and aging. · doi:10.1037/10044-009 · Cited by 128
Bosma, H., van Boxtel, M. P. J., Ponds, R. W. H. M., Jelicic, M., Houx, P., Metsemakers, J., & Jolles, J. (2002) · Zeitschrift f�r Gerontologie und Geriatrie · doi:10.1007/s00391-002-0080-y · Cited by 127
Cognition and survey measurement: History and overview
Jobe, J. B., & Mingay, D. J. (1991) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.2350050303 · Cited by 127
Cognitive Function at High Altitude
Kramer, A. F., Coyne, J., & Strayer, D. L. (1993) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/001872089303500208 · Cited by 127
Self-citationHippocampal brain‐derived neurotrophic factor gene regulation by exercise and the medial septum
Berchtold, N. C., Kesslak, J. P., & Cotman, C. W. (2002) · Journal of Neuroscience Research · doi:10.1002/jnr.10256 · Cited by 126
Beliefs About Memory Changes Across the Adult Life Span
Ryan, E. B. (1992) · Journal of Gerontology · doi:10.1093/geronj/47.1.p41 · Cited by 126
Floyd, M. R., & Scogin, F. R. (1997) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/0882-7974.12.1.150 · Cited by 126
The Influence of Depression on Cognitive Decline in Community-Dwelling Elderly Persons
Sachs‐Ericsson, N., Joiner, T. E., Plant, E. A., & Blazer, D. G. (2005) · American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/00019442-200505000-00009 · Cited by 126
The Contribution of Mediator-Based Deficiencies to Age Differences in Associative Learning.
Dunlosky, J. T., Hertzog, C. K., & Powell-Moman, A. (2005) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.41.2.389 · Cited by 126
Self-citationSelf-efficacy beliefs and change in cognitive performance: MacArthur studies on Successful Aging.
Seeman, T., McAvay, G., Merrill, S., Albert, M., & Rodin, J. (1996) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037//0882-7974.11.3.538 · Cited by 126
Stability and accuracy of metamemory in adulthood and aging: A longitudinal analysis.
McDonald-Miszczak, L., Hertzog, C. K., & Hultsch, D. F. (1995) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037//0882-7974.10.4.553 · Cited by 125
Self-citationEducation modifies the association of amyloid but not tangles with cognitive function
Bennett, D. A., Schneider, J. A., Wilson, R. S., Bienias, J. L., & Arnold, S. E. (2005) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000176286.17192.69 · Cited by 124
Self-citationTraining for Executive Control: Task Coordination Strategies and Aging
Kramer, A. F., Larish, J. F., Weber, T. A., & Bardell, L. (1999) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/1480.003.0031 · Cited by 123
Self-citationCognitive performance inconsistency: Intraindividual change and variability.
Ram, N., Rabbitt, P., Stollery, B. T., & Nesselroade, J. R. (2005) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/0882-7974.20.4.623 · Cited by 122
Larson, E. B., Wang, L., Bowen, J. D., McCormick, W. C., Teri, L. L., Crane, P. K., & Kukull, W. A. (2006) · Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0838.2006.00572.x · Cited by 122
Ga, K. (1998) · PubMed · Cited by 122
Personality, Emotional Intelligence and Exercise
Saklofske, D. H., Austin, E. J., Rohr, B. A., & Andrews, J. J. W. (2007) · Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1177/1359105307082458 · Cited by 121
Successful Mental Health Aging: Results From a Longitudinal Study of Older Australian Men
Almeida, O. P., Norman, P. E., Hankey, G. J., Jamrozik, K. D., & Flicker, L. A. (2006) · American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/01.jgp.0000192486.20308.42 · Cited by 120
Psychological Principles of Successful Aging Technologies: A Mini-Review
Lindenberger, U., Lövdén, M., Schellenbach, M., Li, S., & Krüger, A. (2008) · Gerontology · doi:10.1159/000116114 · Cited by 119
Self-citationImproving memory in older adults: Training recollection
Jennings, J. M., & Jacoby, L. L. (2003) · Neuropsychological Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/09602010244000390 · Cited by 119
DE BEURS, E., BEEKMAN, A. T. F., DEEG, D. J. H., VAN DYCK, R., & VAN TILBURG, W. (2000) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291799001956 · Cited by 118
Long-term effects of fluid ability training in old-old age.
Willis, S. L., & Nesselroade, C. S. (1990) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.26.6.905 · Cited by 116
Jennings, J. M., Webster, L. M., Kleykamp, B. A., & Dagenbach, D. (2005) · Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition · doi:10.1080/138255890968312 · Cited by 115
Leisure activity and cognitive decline in incident Alzheimer disease
Helzner, E. P., Scarmeas, N., Cosentino, S., Portet, F., & Stern, Y. (2007) · Archives of Neurology · doi:10.1001/archneur.64.12.1749 · Cited by 112
Influence of Age and Proximity Warning Devices on Collision Avoidance in Simulated Driving
Kramer, A. F., Cassavaugh, N. D., Horrey, W. J., Becic, E., & Mayhugh, J. (2007) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/001872007x230271 · Cited by 112
Self-citationA longitudinal study of gender differences in depressive symptoms from age 50 to 80.
Barefoot, J. C., Mortensen, E. L., Helms, M. J., Avlund, K., & Schroll, M. (2001) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037//0882-7974.16.2.342 · Cited by 112
The principles of teaching : based on psychology /
Thorndike, E. L. (n.d.) · University of Michigan Library Repository · Cited by 111
Long-Term Maintenance of Gains From Memory Training in Older Adults: Two 31/2Year Follow-up Studies
Neely, A. S., & Bakman, L. (1993) · Journal of Gerontology · doi:10.1093/geronj/48.5.p233 · Cited by 110
Depressive symptoms, clinical AD, and cortical plaques and tangles in older persons
Wilson, R. S., Schneider, J. A., Bienias, J. L., Arnold, S. E., Evans, D. A., & Bennett, D. A. (2003) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000092914.04345.97 · Cited by 109
Self-citationAging and Attenuated Processing Robustness
Li, S., Huxhold, O., & Schmiedek, F. (2003) · Gerontology · doi:10.1159/000074386 · Cited by 109
Change in Depressive Symptoms During the Prodromal Phase of Alzheimer Disease
Wilson, R. S., Arnold, S. E., Beck, T. L., Bienias, J. L., & Bennett, D. A. (2008) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.65.4.439 · Cited by 109
Self-citationBlack-White Differences in Depressive Symptoms Among Older Adults Over Time
Skarupski, K. A., de Leon, C. F. M., Bienias, J. L., Barnes, L. L., Everson‐Rose, S. A., Wilson, R. S., & Evans, D. A. (2005) · The Journals of Gerontology Series B · doi:10.1093/geronb/60.3.p136 · Cited by 108
Self-citationJopp, D., & Hertzog, C. (2007) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/0882-7974.22.4.811 · Cited by 106
Self-citationExpertise and age-related changes in components of intelligence.
Masunaga, H., & Horn, J. (2001) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/0882-7974.16.2.293 · Cited by 105
The principles of teaching based on psychology.
Thorndike, E. L. (1920) · A G Seiler eBooks · doi:10.1037/11487-000 · Cited by 105
Complexity of Life Style and Maintenance of Intellectual Abilities
Gribbin, K., Schaie, K. W., & Parham, I. A. (1980) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1980.tb02021.x · Cited by 105
Varieties of memory compensation by older adults in episodic remembering
Bäckman, L. (1989) · Everyday Cognition in Adulthood and Late Life · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511759390.029 · Cited by 105
Who Benefits From Memory Training?
Bissig, D., & Lustig, C. (2007) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01966.x · Cited by 104
Gobbo, O. L., & O’Mara, S. M. (2004) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2004.09.021 · Cited by 104
Sequential and coordinative processing dynamics in figural transformations across the life span
Mayr, U., Kliegl, R. M., & Krampe, R. T. (1996) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(95)00689-3 · Cited by 103
Freund, A. M., & Baltes, P. B. (2002) · The Journals of Gerontology Series B · doi:10.1093/geronb/57.5.p426 · Cited by 103
Stability and Change of Neuroticism in Aging
Steunenberg, B., Twisk, J. W. R., Beekman, A. T. F., Deeg, D. J. H., & Kerkhof, A. J. F. M. (2005) · The Journals of Gerontology Series B · doi:10.1093/geronb/60.1.p27 · Cited by 103
Emery, C. F., Shermer, R. L., Hauck, E. R., Hsiao, E. T., & MacIntyre, N. R. (2003) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/0278-6133.22.6.598 · Cited by 101
Ghisletta, P., McArdle, J. J., & Lindenberger, U. (2006) · European Psychologist · doi:10.1027/1016-9040.11.3.204 · Cited by 101
Self-citationHo, S. C., Woo, J., Sham, A., Chan, S. G., & Yu, A. L. (2001) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/30.6.1389 · Cited by 100
Hunt, R. R., & Smith, R. E. (1996) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03200882 · Cited by 100
Christensen, H. M., & Mackinnon, A. J. (1993) · Age and Ageing · doi:10.1093/ageing/22.3.175 · Cited by 100
Riediger, M., Li, S.-C., & Lindenberger, U. (2006) · Handbook of the Psychology of Aging · doi:10.1016/b978-012101264-9/50016-1 · Cited by 99
Self-citationCognitive rehabilitation in the elderly: A randomized trial to evaluate a new protocol
Stuss, D. T., Robertson, I. H., Craik, F. I. M., Levine, B., ALEXANDER, M. P., Black, S. E., DAWSON, D. R., Binns, M. A., Palmer, H., Lamb, M. M. D., et al. (2006) · Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society · doi:10.1017/s1355617707070154 · Cited by 99
Life-Span Developmental Psychology: Introduction to Research Methods
Erber, J. T. (1979) · Journal of Gerontology · doi:10.1093/geronj/34.3.448 · Cited by 98
The Self-Monitoring Approach for Effective Learning
Dunlosky, J. T., Hertzog, C. K., Kennedy, M. R. F., & Thiede, K. W. (2005) · Cited by 98
Self-citationSelf-efficacy beliefs and change in cognitive performance: MacArthur studies on Successful Aging.
Seeman, T. E., MCAVAY, G. J., Merrill, S., et al. (1996) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/0882-7974.11.3.538 · Cited by 97
Individual differences in trajectory of intellectual development over 45 years of adulthood.
Arbuckle, T. Y., Maag, U., Pushkar, D., & Chaikelson, J. S. (1998) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/0882-7974.13.4.663 · Cited by 97
Levitin, D. J., Baltes, P. B., & Knopf, O. (1975) · Cited by 97
Another source of individual differences: Strategy adaptivity to changing rates of success.
Schunn, C. D., & Reder, L. M. (2001) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.130.1.59 · Cited by 95
Perceived Control Over Memory Aging: Developmental and Intervention Perspectives
Lachman, M. E. (1991) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1991.tb01840.x · Cited by 94
Li, S., Brehmer, Y., Shing, Y. L., Werkle‐Bergner, M., & Lindenberger, U. (2006) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2006.06.004 · Cited by 93
Self-citationFlorida Cognitive Activities Scale: Initial development and validation
Schinka, J. A., MCBRIDE, A., Vanderploeg, R. D., Tennyson, K., Borenstein, A. R., & Mortimer, J. A. (2005) · Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society · doi:10.1017/s1355617705050125 · Cited by 93
Premorbid Reading Activity and Patterns of Cognitive Decline in Alzheimer Disease
Wilson, R. S., Bennett, D. A., Gilley, D. W., Beckett, L. A., Barnes, L. L., & Evans, D. A. (2000) · Archives of Neurology · doi:10.1001/archneur.57.12.1718 · Cited by 93
Self-citationSymptoms of Depression in the Oldest Old: A Longitudinal Study
Haynie, D. A., Berg, S., Johansson, B. E. A., Gatz, M., & Zarit, S. H. (2001) · The Journals of Gerontology Series B · doi:10.1093/geronb/56.2.p111 · Cited by 92
Expertise as the circumvention of human processing limitations.
Salthouse, T. A. (1991) · Cited by 92
(1992) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 91
Cognitive Decline and Survival in Alzheimer’s Disease according to Education Level
Bruandet, A., Richard, F., Bombois, S., Maurage, C., Masse, I., Amouyel, P., & Pasquier, F. (2007) · Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders · doi:10.1159/000111693 · Cited by 90
Hofer, S., Flaherty, B., & Hoffman, L. (2006) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr4102_4 · Cited by 90
A longitudinal study of gender differences in depressive symptoms from age 50 to 80.
Barefoot, J. C., Mortensen, E. L., Helms, M. J., et al. (2001) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/0882-7974.16.2.342 · Cited by 89
Baltes, M. M., & Kühl, K.-P. (1992) · Journal of Gerontology · doi:10.1093/geronj/47.3.p165 · Cited by 89
Aging and skill acquisition: Learning-performance distinctions.
Strayer, D. L., & Kramer, A. F. (1994) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/0882-7974.9.4.589 · Cited by 89
Self-citationSelf-Discipline and Self-Consciousness Predict Subjective Memory in Older Adults
Pearman, A. M., & Storandt, M. (2005) · The Journals of Gerontology Series B · doi:10.1093/geronb/60.3.p153 · Cited by 88
Variability in Cognitive Aging: From Taxonomy to Theory
Lindenberger, U., & von Oertzen, T. (2006) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195169539.003.0021 · Cited by 88
Self-citationColonia-Willner, R. (1998) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/0882-7974.13.1.45 · Cited by 88
Colonia-Willner, R. C. (1998) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037//0882-7974.13.1.45 · Cited by 88
An Engagement Model of Cognitive Optimization Through Adulthood
Stine‐Morrow, E. A. L., Parisi, J. M., Morrow, D. G., Greene, J., & Park, D. C. (2007) · The Journals of Gerontology Series B · doi:10.1093/geronb/62.special_issue_1.62 · Cited by 87
Multivariate Modeling of Age and Retest in Longitudinal Studies of Cognitive Abilities.
Ferrer, E. E., Salthouse, T. A., McArdle, J. J., et al. (2005) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/0882-7974.20.3.412 · Cited by 87
Hess, T. M. (2006) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2006.24.3.279 · Cited by 87
Stability and accuracy of metamemory in adulthood and aging: A longitudinal analysis.
McDonald-Miszczak, L., Hertzog, C. K., & Hultsch, D. F. (1995) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/0882-7974.10.4.553 · Cited by 87
Self-citationAging, Metacognition, and Cognitive Control
Hertzog, C., & Dunlosky, J. (2004) · Psychology of Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/s0079-7421(03)45006-8 · Cited by 86
Self-citationDECEIVING THE ELDERLY: EFFECTS OF ACCESSIBILITY BIAS IN CUED-RECALL PERFORMANCE
Jacoby, L. L. (1999) · Cognitive Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/026432999380861 · Cited by 86
Kliegl, R. M., Smith, J., & Baltes, P. B. (1989) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037//0012-1649.25.2.247 · Cited by 86
The Dumbledore Hypothesis of Cognitive Aging
Stine-Morrow, E. A. L. (2007) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00524.x · Cited by 85
Stem-cell-associated structural and functional plasticity in the aging hippocampus.
Jessberger, S., & Gage, F. H. (2008) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/a0014188 · Cited by 85
Leisure activities and the risk of dementia in the elderly
Sanders, A., & Verghese, J. (2007) · Cited by 85
Conscientiousness and the Intention–Behavior Relationship: Predicting Exercise Behavior
Conner, M. T., Rodgers, W. M., & Murray, T. C. (2007) · Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology · doi:10.1123/jsep.29.4.518 · Cited by 84
Metacognitive training aids decision making
Batha, K., & Carroll, M. (2007) · Australian Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1080/00049530601148371 · Cited by 84
Memory Self-Efficacy in Its Social Cognitive Context
Berry, J. M. (1999) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-012345260-3/50005-7 · Cited by 84
What Studies of Actors and Acting Can Tell Us About Memory and Cognitive Functioning
Noice, H., & Noice, T. (2006) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2006.00398.x · Cited by 84
Wallace, J., & O’Hara, M. W. (1992) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-843x.101.3.398 · Cited by 84
EXERCISE AND REGIONAL BONE MINERAL DENSITY IN POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN
Kelley, G. A. (1998) · American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation · doi:10.1097/00002060-199801000-00015 · Cited by 83
Baron, A., & Mattila, W. R. (1989) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/0882-7974.4.1.66 · Cited by 83
Chapman, M., Skinner, E. A., & Baltes, P. B. (1990) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.26.2.246 · Cited by 81
Kliegl, R. M., & Baltes, P. B. (1985) · publish.UP (University of Potsdam) · Cited by 81
Psychological Perspectives of Helplessness and Control in the Elderly
(1988) · Advances in psychology · doi:10.1016/s0166-4115(08)x6040-6 · Cited by 80
Diabetes mellitus, dementia, and cognitive function in older persons.
Arvanitakis, Z., Wilson, R. S., & Bennett, D. A. (2006) · PubMed · Cited by 79
Self-citationPractical intelligence and tacit knowledge: Advancements in the measurement of developing expertise
Cianciolo, A. T., Grigorenko, E. L., Jarvin, L., Gil, G., Drebot, M. E., & Sternberg, R. J. (2006) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2006.04.002 · Cited by 78
Cognitive Activity and Risk of Alzheimer's Disease
Wilson, R. S., & Bennett, D. A. (2003) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/1467-8721.01236 · Cited by 77
Self-citationCognitive decline in old age: Separating retest effects from the effects of growing older.
Wilson, R. S., Li, Y., Bienias, L., & Bennett, D. A. (2006) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/0882-7974.21.4.774 · Cited by 77
Self-citationRypma, B., Eldreth, D. A., & Rebbechi, D. (2007) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70446-5 · Cited by 77
Longitudinal hierarchical linear models of the Memory Functioning Questionnaire.
Lane, C. J., & Zelinski, E. M. (2003) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/0882-7974.18.1.38 · Cited by 77
Data Analytic Techniques for Dynamical Systems
Boker, S. M., & Wenger, M. J. (2012) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203936757 · Cited by 76
An examination of age and cognitive test performance across job complexity and occupational types.
Avolio, B. J., & Waldman, D. A. (1990) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.75.1.43 · Cited by 74
Do ability-performance relationships differentiate age and practice effects in visual search?
Rogers, W. A., Fisk, A. D., & Hertzog, C. K. (1994) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037//0278-7393.20.3.710 · Cited by 74
Self-citationChange in Depressive Symptoms in the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging
Davey, A., Halverson, C. F., Zonderman, A. B., & Costa, P. T. (2004) · The Journals of Gerontology Series B · doi:10.1093/geronb/59.6.p270 · Cited by 73
Yang, L., Krampe, R. T., & Baltes, P. B. (2006) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/0882-7974.21.2.372 · Cited by 73
Effects of cognitive training on primary mental ability structure.
Schaie, K. W., Willis, S. L., Hertzog, C. K., & Schulenberg, J. E. (1987) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037//0882-7974.2.3.233 · Cited by 72
Self-citationMetacognition and Intelligence
Hertzog, C., & Robinson, A. E. (2005) · Handbook of Understanding and Measuring Intelligence · doi:10.4135/9781452233529.n7 · Cited by 71
Self-citationMackinnon, A. J., Christensen, H. M., Hofer, S. M., Korten, A. E., & Jorm, A. F. (2003) · Aging Neuropsychology and Cognition · doi:10.1076/anec.10.3.215.16451 · Cited by 70
Brehmer, Y., Li, S.-C., Straube, B., Stoll, G., von Oertzen, T., Müller, V., & Lindenberger, U. (2008) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/0882-7974.23.2.227 · Cited by 69
Self-citationFluid intelligence in an older COPD sample after short- or long-term exercise
ETNIER, J. L., & BERRY, M. (2001) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1097/00005768-200110000-00002 · Cited by 69
Bäckman, L., Josephsson, S., Herlitz, A., et al. (1991) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/0882-7974.6.3.489 · Cited by 68
Lifespan Theories of Cognitive Development
Lindenberger, U. (2001) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b0-08-043076-7/01572-2 · Cited by 67
Self-citationThe effect of multiple indicators on the power to detect inter‐individual differences in change
von Oertzen, T., Hertzog, C. K., Lindenberger, U., & Ghisletta, P. (2010) · British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology · doi:10.1348/000711010x486633 · Cited by 67
Self-citationLindenberger, U., & Baltes, P. B. (2010) · Human Development · doi:10.1159/000278341 · Cited by 66
Self-citationWhat goods can self‐assessment questionnaires deliver for cognitive gerontology?
Rabbitt, P., Maylor, E., McInnes, L., Bent, N., & Moore, B. (1995) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.2350090709 · Cited by 66
Determinants of adult age differences on synthetic work performance.
Salthouse, T. A., Hambrick, D. Z., Lukas, K. E., & Dell, T. C. (1996) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied · doi:10.1037/1076-898x.2.4.305 · Cited by 66
Toward an experimental psychology of aging.
Birren, J. E. (1970) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/h0029443 · Cited by 64
Lindenberger, U., Li, S., & Bäckman, L. (2006) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2006.06.006 · Cited by 64
Self-citation(1977) · MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) · Cited by 63
Measurement of cognitive outcome and quality of life in congenital heart disease
Daliento, L., Mapelli, D., & Volpe, B. (2006) · Heart · doi:10.1136/hrt.2004.057273 · Cited by 62
Aging and individual differences in the development of skilled memory search performance.
Hertzog, C. K., Cooper, B. P., & Fisk, A. D. (1996) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037//0882-7974.11.3.497 · Cited by 62
Self-citationA model of cognitive development across the life span
DENNEY, N. (1984) · Developmental Review · doi:10.1016/0273-2297(84)90006-6 · Cited by 60
Possible Selves in Adult Development: Linking Theory and Research.
Frazier, L. D., & Hooker, K. A. (2006) · Cited by 60
Wallace, J., & O’Hara, M. W. (1992) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-843x.101.3.398 · Cited by 59
An Individual Differences Perspective: Implications for Cognitive Research in Gerontology
Hertzog, C. (1985) · Research on Aging · doi:10.1177/0164027585007001002 · Cited by 58
Self-citationA multilevel model analysis of expertise in chess across the life span.
Roring, R. W., & Charness, N. (2007) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/0882-7974.22.2.291 · Cited by 58
Use It—and Keep It, Longer, Probably: A Reply to Salthouse (2006)
Schooler, C. (2007) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00026.x · Cited by 58
Research design in studies of aging and cognition.
Hertzog, C. K. (1996) · Cited by 58
Self-citationPotential of cognitive plasticity as a diagnostic instrument: A cross-validation and extension.
Baltes, M. M., Kühl, K.-P., Gutzmann, H., & Sowarka, D. (1995) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037//0882-7974.10.2.167 · Cited by 58
Long-term effects of mnemonic training in community-dwelling older adults
O'Hara, R. M., Brooks, J. O., Friedman, L., Schroder, C. M., Morgan, K. S., & KRAEMER, H. C. (2006) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2006.04.010 · Cited by 56
Intraindividual change in text recall of the elderly
Hertzog, C. K., Dixon, R. A., & Hultsch, D. F. (1992) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/0093-934x(92)90100-s · Cited by 55
Self-citationNeuroticism Does Not Affect Cognitive Functioning in Later Life
Jelicic, M., Bosma, H., Ponds, R. W. H. M., Van Boxtel, M. P. J., Houx, P. J., & Jolles, J. (2003) · Experimental Aging Research · doi:10.1080/03610730303704 · Cited by 55 · cited 1×
“(Arbuckle, Maag, Pushkar, & Chaikelson, 1998; Hultsch et al., 1999; Jelicic et al., 2003; Wetherell, Reynolds, Gatz, & Pedersen, 2002).”
Rowe, J. W., & Kahn, R. L. (1999) · Nursing Administration Quarterly · doi:10.1097/00006216-199923020-00016 · Cited by 55
Health, Behavior, and Optimal Aging
Aldwin, C. M., Spiro, A., & Park, C. L. (2006) · Handbook of the Psychology of Aging · doi:10.1016/b978-012101264-9/50008-2 · Cited by 54
Future Selves and Aging: Older Adults' Memory Fears
Dark-Freudeman, A., West, R. L., & Viverito, K. M. (2006) · Educational Gerontology · doi:10.1080/03601270500388125 · Cited by 52
Jones, T. A., Hawrylak, N., & Greenough, W. T. (1996) · Psychoneuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/0306-4530(95)00041-0 · Cited by 51 · cited 2×
“One approach is represented by the early study of complex or enriched environments on brain function and performance in animals (Black et al., 1990; Ehninger &Kempermann, 2003; Jones et al., 1996; Kempermann, 2008; Kempermann et al., 1997;Rosenzweig&Bennett, 1996).”
BackgroundJöhren, O., Flügge, G., & Fuchs, E. (1994) · Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology · doi:10.1007/bf02088326 · Cited by 50
THE INFLUENCES OF PERSONALITY AND MOTIVATION ON EXERCISE PARTICIPATION AND QUALITY OF LIFE
Huang, C.-H., Lee, L., & Chang, M. (2007) · Social Behavior and Personality An International Journal · doi:10.2224/sbp.2007.35.9.1189 · Cited by 50
Spaced Retrieval Enhances Memory in Older Adults with Probable Alzheimer's Disease
Cherry, K. E., Simmons, S. S., & Camp, C. J. (1999) · Journal of Clinical Geropsychology · doi:10.1023/a:1022983131186 · Cited by 50
Moss, M. C., Franks, M., Briggs, P., Kennedy, D. O., & Scholey, A. B. (2005) · Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/13803390490515450 · Cited by 48
Age and skill in visual search.
Clancy, S. M., & Hoyer, W. J. (1994) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.30.4.545 · Cited by 48
Evaluation of quality of life in elderly healthy subjects after aerobic and/or mental training
Fabre, C., Massé-Biron, J., Chamari, K., Varray, A., Mucci, P., & Préfaut, C. (1999) · Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics · doi:10.1016/s0167-4943(98)00118-6 · Cited by 47
Hertzog, C., Hultsch, D. F., & Dixon, R. A. (1999) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/0882-7974.14.3.528 · Cited by 47
Self-citationEffects of cognitive training on primary mental ability structure.
Schaie, K. W., Willis, S. L., Hertzog, C. K., et al. (1987) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/0882-7974.2.3.233 · Cited by 47
Self-citationMemory Control Beliefs: How are They Related to Age, Strategy Use and Memory Improvement?
Lachman, M. E., Andreoletti, C., & Pearman, A. M. (2006) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2006.24.3.359 · Cited by 47
Walking and dementia in physically capable elderly men
Abbott, R. D., White, L. R., & Ross, G. W. (2004) · ACC Current Journal Review · doi:10.1016/j.accreview.2004.11.069 · Cited by 47
Criterion-related validity of the Geriatric Depression Scale in Alzheimer's disease.
Gilley, D., & Wilson, R. (1997) · Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/01688639708403739 · Cited by 46
Self-citationCharacterizing mature human intelligence
Masunaga, H., & Horn, J. L. (2000) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/s1041-6080(00)00038-8 · Cited by 46
Bäckman, L., Josephsson, S., Herlitz, A., et al. (1991) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037//0882-7974.6.3.489 · Cited by 46
Aging and the development of automaticity in conjunction search
Scialfa, C. T., Jenkins, L., Hamaluk, E., & Skaloud, P. (2000) · The Journals of Gerontology Series B · doi:10.1093/geronb/55.1.p27 · Cited by 45
How is knowledge generated about memory encoding strategy effectiveness?
Hertzog, C. K., Price, J., & Dunlosky, J. T. (2008) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2007.12.002 · Cited by 45
Self-citationEnhancing Cognition after Stress with Gene Therapy
Nicholas, A. C., Munhoz, C. D., Ferguson, D., Chappell-Campbell, L., & Sapolsky, R. M. (2006) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3122-06.2006 · Cited by 45
van Hooren, S., Valentijn, S. A. M., Bosma, H., Ponds, R., van Boxtel, M. P. J., & Jolles, J. (2005) · The Journals of Gerontology Series B · doi:10.1093/geronb/60.1.p57 · Cited by 44
Terracciano, A., McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (2006) · The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences · doi:10.1093/geronb/61.2.p108 · Cited by 44 · cited 1×
“, 2005; Wallace & O’Hara, 1992) or neuroticism (Mroczek & Spiro, 2003; Small et al., 2003; Steunenberg et al., 2005; Terracciano et al., 2006) in old age.”
BackgroundAging and individual differences in the development of skilled memory search performance.
Hertzog, C. K., Cooper, B. P., & Fisk, A. D. (1996) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/0882-7974.11.3.497 · Cited by 44
Self-citationTaking Charge of Remembering: Locus of Control and Older Adults' Memory for Speech
Riggs, K. M., Lachman, M. E., & Wingfield, A. (1997) · Experimental Aging Research · doi:10.1080/03610739708254282 · Cited by 42
Cognitive Plasticity and Aging
Kramer, A. F., & Willis, S. L. (2003) · Psychology of Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/s0079-7421(03)01016-8 · Cited by 41
Self-citationPotential of cognitive plasticity as a diagnostic instrument: A cross-validation and extension.
Baltes, M. M., Kühl, K.-P., Gutzmann, H., et al. (1995) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/0882-7974.10.2.167 · Cited by 41
Dynamic Plasticity Influences the Emergence of Function in a Simple Cortical Array
Shrager, J., & Johnson, M. H. (1996) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/0893-6080(96)00033-0 · Cited by 41
Measurement of Activity in the Elderly: The Activities Checklist
Arbuckle, T. Y., Gold, D. P., Chaikelson, J., & Lapidus, S. (1994) · Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement · doi:10.1017/s0714980800006395 · Cited by 40
Typical Intellectual Engagement and Cognition in Old Age
Dellenbach, M., & Zimprich, D. (2008) · Aging Neuropsychology and Cognition · doi:10.1080/13825580701338094 · Cited by 40
Dynamics in Self‐Regulation: Plan Execution Self‐Efficacy and Mastery of Action Plans
Scholz, U., Sniehotta, F. F., Schüz, B., & Oeberst, A. (2007) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2007.00277.x · Cited by 39
Apnea Diving: Long-Term Neurocognitive Sequelae of Repeated Hypoxemia
Ridgway, L., & McFarland, K. A. (2006) · The Clinical Neuropsychologist · doi:10.1080/13854040590947407 · Cited by 38
Parslow, R. A., Jorm, A. F., Christensen, H., & Mackinnon, A. (2006) · Gerontology · doi:10.1159/000091829 · Cited by 37
[Coronary heart disease and physical activity].
NITTER‐HAUGE, S. (1972) · PubMed · Cited by 36
Field Test of Video Game Trainer
Hart, S. G., & Battiste, V. (1992) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1518/107118192786749450 · Cited by 33
Bennett, D. A., Wilson, R. S., Schneider, J. A., Bienias, J. L., & Arnold, S. E. (2004) · The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/00019442-200403000-00012 · Cited by 33
Self-citationDong, Y. H., & Lei, L. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-99-6000-2_435-1 · Cited by 33
Theoretical Approaches to the Study of Cognitive Aging: An Individual-Differences Perspective
Hertzog, C. (2008) · Handbook of Cognitive Aging: Interdisciplinary Perspectives · doi:10.4135/9781412976589.n2 · Cited by 32
Self-citationMemory Fitness: A Guide for Successful Aging
Einstein, G. O., & McDaniel, M. A. (2004) · Cited by 31
Lindenberger, U., Li, S., & Bäckman, L. (2006) · Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics · Cited by 30
Self-citationDo Self-Monitoring Interventions Improve Older Adult Learning?
Dunlosky, J., Cavallini, E., Roth, H., McGuire, C. L., Vecchi, T., & Hertzog, C. (2007) · The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences · doi:10.1093/geronb/62.special_issue_1.70 · Cited by 29
Self-citationLooking for Signs of Alzheimer's Disease
Hodgson, L. G., & Cutler, S. J. (2003) · The International Journal of Aging and Human Development · doi:10.2190/e6j1-pux7-j43c-090b · Cited by 28
Retrieval Time from Different Memory Stores
Waugh, N. C., Thomas, J. C., & Fozard, J. L. (1978) · Journal of Gerontology · doi:10.1093/geronj/33.5.718 · Cited by 28
MEEUSEN, R. R. (2003) · VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) · Cited by 28
Watson, F. L., Pasteur, M.-A., Healy, D., et al. (1994) · Human Psychopharmacology Clinical and Experimental · doi:10.1002/hup.470090107 · Cited by 27
(2003) · Cited by 27
Evaluation of “Vital Aging-M”: A Psychosocial Program for Promoting Optimal Aging
Ballesteros, R. F. (2005) · European Psychologist · doi:10.1027/1016-9040.10.2.146 · Cited by 26
Long-Term Treatment with Procaine (Gerovital H3) in Albino Rats
Aslan, A., Vräbiescu, A., Domilescu, C., et al. (1965) · Journal of Gerontology · doi:10.1093/geronj/20.1.1 · Cited by 26
MASTERY BELIEFS AND PRODUCTIVE LEISURE ACTIVITIES IN THE THIRD AGE
Timmer, E., & Aartsen, M. (2003) · Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal · doi:10.2224/sbp.2003.31.7.643 · Cited by 24
Dishman, R. K., Berthoud, H. R., Booth, F. W., Cotman, C. W., Edgerton, V. R., Fleshner, M., Gandevia, S. C., Gómez‐Pinilla, F., Greenwood, B. N., Hillman, C. H., et al. (2006) · Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0838.2006.00610_1.x · Cited by 24
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 30
- Arvanitakis Z., 2006, Journal of Nutrition Health & Aging, 10, 287
- Carlson M.C., Colcombe S.J., Kramer A.F., Mielke M., Fried L.P. (2006). Exploring effects of experience corps on neurocognitive function. Paper presented at the Cognitive Aging Conference, Atlanta, GA .
- Cherry K.E., 1999, Journal of Clinical Gerontology, 5, 159
- Chopra D., 2001, Grow younger, live longer: 10 steps to reverse aging
- Cohen J., 1988, Statistical power analysis for the social sciences
- Costa P.T., 1992, Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual
- Cotman C.W., 1995, Synaptic plasticity
- Dellenbach M., 2008, Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 27, 6
- Dunlosky J., 2005, Cognitive Technology, 10, 4
- Eysenck H.J., 1968, Manual of the Eysenck Personality Inventory
- Fries J.F., 1981, Vitality and aging
- Frost R., 1920, Mountain interval
- Hertzog C., 1996, Handbook of the psychology of aging, 24
- Hertzog C., Cognition in aging: Methodologies and applications
- Kausler D.H., 1994, Learning and memory in normal aging
- Langer E.J., 1989, Mindfulness
- Li S.-C., Imaging the aging brain
- Lindenberger U., 2006, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 30, 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2006.06.006 · DOI
- Martin L.G., 1994, The demography of aging
- Molenaar P.C.M., Current Directions in Psychological Research
- Nesselroade J.R., 1991, Visions of aesthetics, the environment and development: The legacy of Joachim Wohlwill, 213
- Raz N., 2000, Handbook of aging and cognition, 1
- Ribot T., 1882, Diseases of memory
- Rogers W.A., 1994, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20, 710
- Salthouse T.A., 1991, Towards a general theory of expertise: Prospects and limits, 286
- Schneider B., 2000, Handbook of aging and cognition, 155
- 10.1093/geronj/48.5.P233 · DOI
- Tetens J.N., 1777, Philosophische Versuche über die menschliche Natur und ihre Entwicklung (Philosophical essays on human nature and its development)
- Willis S.L., 1996, Handbook of the psychology of aging, 287
- Wilson R.S., 2004, Journal of Neurology: Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 75, 126
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Perceived social isolation and cognition
Cacioppo, J. T., & Hawkley, L. C. (2009) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2009.06.005 · Cited by 2,144
Harnessing neuroplasticity for clinical applications
Cramer, S. C., Sur, M., Dobkin, B. H., O'Brien, C., Sanger, T. D., Trojanowski, J. Q., Rumsey, J. M., Hicks, R., Cameron, J., Chen, D., et al. (2011) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awr039 · Cited by 1,259
“Changes associated with neurodegenerative diseases can be superimposed on declines and reduced plasticity associated with normal ageing (Gould et al., 2006; Mahncke et al., 2006; Hertzog et al., 2009).”
Self-citationEducation and cognitive functioning across the life span
Lövdén, M., Fratiglioni, L., Glymour, M. M., Lindenberger, U., & Tucker-Drob, E. M. (2020) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1177/1529100620920576 · Cited by 1,224
Self-citationMemory aging and brain maintenance
Nyberg, L. H., Lövdén, M., Riklund, K., Lindenberger, U., & Bäckman, L. (2012) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2012.04.005 · Cited by 1,347
Self-citationDo “brain-training” programs work?
Simons, D. J., Boot, W. R., Charness, N., Gathercole, S. E., Chabris, C. F., Hambrick, D. Z., & Stine-Morrow, E. A. L. (2016) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1177/1529100616661983 · Cited by 1,183
Metadata
- Authors
- Hertzog, C., Kramer, A. F., Wilson, R. S., & Lindenberger, U.
- Affiliations
- Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- Rush University Medical Center (US)
- Max Planck Institute for Human Development (DE)
- Venue
- Psychological Science in the Public Interest
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2008-10
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-65
- ISSN
- 1539-6053 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-1006
- OpenAlex
- W2115123524
- Semantic Scholar
- 54c4b6b7238614f83b759d3cd88fb3c8dfbba7c2
- Cited by
- 1,495
- References
- 601
- Citations by year
- 2026: 85 · 2025: 92 · 2024: 101 · 2023: 71 · 2022: 86 · 2021: 87 · 2020: 82 · 2019: 94 · 2018: 95 · 2017: 121 · 2016: 101 · 2015: 81 · 2014: 87 · 2013: 96 · 2012: 74
- FWCI
- 50.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Gothic.net (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
- Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Keywords
- cognitive enrichment, cognitive aging, older adults, cognitive training, transfer of training, neuroplasticity, intellectual engagement, physical activity, social engagement, cognitive reserve, Alzheimer's disease risk, cognitive decline, executive function, video games, task switching, divided attention, knowledge and expertise, adult cognitive development, cognitive plasticity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-06, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-06 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review