The DOI matches its Crossref record; 245 of the 247 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 9 of the 366 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
The athletic gut microbiota
Open accessAbstract
The microorganisms in the gastrointestinal tract play a significant role in nutrient uptake, vitamin synthesis, energy harvest, inflammatory modulation, and host immune response, collectively contributing to human health. Important factors such as age, birth method, antibiotic use, and diet have been established as formative factors that shape the gut microbiota. Yet, less described is the role that exercise plays, particularly how associated factors and stressors, such as sport/exercise-specific diet, environment, and their interactions, may influence the gut microbiota. In particular, high-level athletes offer remarkable physiology and metabolism (including muscular strength/power, aerobic capacity, energy expenditure, and heat production) compared to sedentary individuals, and provide unique insight in gut microbiota research. In addition, the gut microbiota with its ability to harvest energy, modulate the immune system, and influence gastrointestinal health, likely plays an important role in athlete health, wellbeing, and sports performance. Therefore, understanding the mechanisms in which the gut microbiota could play in the role of influencing athletic performance is of considerable interest to athletes who work to improve their results in competition as well as reduce recovery time during training. Ultimately this research is expected to extend beyond athletics as understanding optimal fitness has applications for overall health and wellness in larger communities. Therefore, the purpose of this narrative review is to summarize current knowledge of the athletic gut microbiota and the factors that shape it. Exercise, associated dietary factors, and the athletic classification promote a more "health-associated" gut microbiota. Such features include a higher abundance of health-promoting bacterial species, increased microbial diversity, functional metabolic capacity, and microbial-associated metabolites, stimulation of bacterial abundance that can modulate mucosal immunity, and improved gastrointestinal barrier function.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This narrative review summarizes evidence that exercise, athletic diet, and athlete classification are associated with a more “health-associated” gut microbiota, including greater diversity, health-promoting taxa, short-chain fatty acids, and functional metabolic pathways. It also emphasizes that causality and long-term effects remain unclear because most evidence is cross-sectional, methodologically heterogeneous, and confounded by diet.
Key findings
- Athletes generally show higher gut microbiota diversity and health-associated taxa than controls. In professional rugby players (n = 40) vs matched controls (n = 46), athletes had higher diversity representing 22 distinct phyla; *Akkermansia* was higher in athletes and low-BMI controls than high-BMI controls. In female cohorts, athletes had the highest alpha diversity, while anorexia nervosa and obese participants had lower richness.
- Exercise and fitness correlate with microbial diversity and short-chain fatty acids. VO2peak explained ~20% of variation in gut bacterial alpha diversity in one study and ~22% of variance in the Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio in another; athletes had enriched fecal SCFAs (acetate, propionate, butyrate) and higher TMAO. In cyclists, *Prevotella* was higher in those training > 11 h/week; *Akkermansia* was present in 30/33 cyclists, with 7 having relative abundances > 2%.
- Acute and chronic exercise can shift specific taxa and metabolites. Post-marathon *Veillonella* increased; *Veillonella atypica* inoculation improved mouse time to exhaustion by 13%. In prediabetic men, exercise responders had −42.70% fasting insulin and −49.60% HOMA-IR, with ~30% responding poorly; baseline microbiome predicted response. Ultra-endurance rowing increased alpha diversity by day 17 and persisted at 3 months.
- Diet interacts strongly: protein intake correlated positively with diversity in rugby athletes but negatively with Shannon diversity in distance runners (R = −0.63, P = 0.01); fat intake negatively correlated with *Bifidobacteria* in bodybuilders (R = −0.52, P = 0.05). High-protein supplementation increased Bacteroidetes and decreased *Roseburia*, *Blautia*, and *B. longum*; ketogenic LCHF increased *Bacteroides*/*Dorea* and decreased *Faecalibacterium*.
Methods
- Narrative review summarizing current knowledge of the athletic gut microbiota and the factors that shape it; not a systematic review or meta-analysis.
- Synthesizes animal and human studies, including cross-sectional comparisons, longitudinal exercise interventions, randomized controlled trials, and metabolomic/metagenomic studies; Tables 1 and 2 list included article characteristics.
- Main analysis is narrative synthesis of compositional and functional microbiome findings, with attention to exercise, diet, and athlete classification.
Limitations
- Stated: current evidence is limited; much research is cross-sectional and has relied on 16S rRNA sequencing; methodological variation across studies makes comparisons difficult; many studies may be underpowered and fail to control for confounders such as diet, sex, ethnicity, GI problems, and antibiotics; deep discussion of each study’s methods was not possible.
- Stated: exercise and diet are difficult to separate, and athletes’ distinct diets may confound exercise-specific effects.
- Evident: as a narrative review, it does not report a systematic search strategy, risk-of-bias assessment, or quantitative pooling; included studies are heterogeneous and often small, limiting causal inference.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
283 Not checked yet · 69 Own interpretation · 30 No basis given · 3 Partly supported · 1 Own method · accuracy not yet measured
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“the gut microbiota produces and releases an enormous array of compounds which may act upon host tissues modulating appetite, gut motility, energy uptake and storage, and energy expenditure [146, 147].”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [146] Heiss CN, 2018, J Innate Immun source
The Summary states that the gut microbiota produces metabolites and bacterial products that signal to host tissues, changing appetite, gut motility, energy uptake and storage, and energy expenditure. The Abstract makes the same point and gives examples of those compounds. No page numbers are provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.94)
- Partly supportedcites [147] Donia MS, 2015, Science. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Menu of Molecules and Outlook sections describe a wide range of microbiota-produced compounds, some of which reach host tissues or participate in host signaling. The paper links bacterial tryptamine to enteric nervous-system signaling, but the passages do not establish the claimed effects on appetite, gut motility, energy uptake and storage, or energy expenditure. (LLM, conf=0.86)
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Prevotella is normally found in only a small percentage of healthy individuals in European and American cohorts [1, 2, 20, 210].”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [1] Human Microbiome Project C, 2012, Nature. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The ‘Microbial diversity of healthy humans’ section identifies Prevotella in subgingival plaque and mentions gut Prevotella copri, but gives no percentage of healthy individuals carrying the genus. Searches for Prevotella prevalence and European or American cohorts found no passage establishing the claimed low prevalence. (LLM, conf=0.76)
- Could not verifycites [2] Qin J, 2010, Nature. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Common bacterial core section (p. 3) discusses species abundance and healthy controls, but does not identify Prevotella or report how often it occurs in healthy individuals. The Discussion (p. 6) describes a European cohort and mentions American studies without giving Prevotella prevalence. Searches for Prevotella and for its prevalence in European and American cohorts found no passage addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)
- Partly supportedcites [20] Zhou Y, 2014, Genome Biol sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results (Identification of community classes in human microbiota; page unavailable) assign 7.2% of healthy HMP stool samples to a Prevotella-dominated enterotype, and identify a comparable enterotype in a European study. But an enterotype is not the same as the presence of Prevotella: the paper does not establish that the genus is found in only a small percentage of healthy people in European and American cohorts. (LLM, conf=0.88)
- Partly supportedcites [210] Gorvitovskaia A, 2016, Microbiome. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Background says Western American and European gut microbiomes tend to be dominated by Bacteroides and Clostridiales rather than Prevotella. The Results and discussion reports lower Prevotella abundance in Western samples, but does not establish that Prevotella is found in only a small percentage of healthy European and American individuals. Its figure of 75% of samples having less than 5% Prevotella refers to relative abundance across all studies, not the percentage of Western individuals in whom it is found. (LLM, conf=0.86)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Could not verify
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Amongst the exercise studies in animals there was little agreement regarding what taxa are influenced by chronic exercise.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of exercise on the gut microbiota
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In terms of human research there are few studies that have examined the effect of energy intake and energy expenditure on the gut microbiota.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“little is known on the effects of energy reduced diets in athletes looking to healthfully reduce bodyweight and/or improve body composition.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“To date, no study in athletes has addressed RED-S in relation to the gut microbiota.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
In the paper
“In contrast to high-energy intake and obesity, even less is known about the gut microbiota in undernutrition [142].”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [142] Krajmalnik-Brown R, 2012, Nutr Clin Pract source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Various studies have explored the gut microbiota of anorexia nervosa patients with the majority of them being characterized by heterogeneity in the methodology and small sample sizes (for review see: [167]).”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [167] Mack I, 2018, Curr Neuropharmacol source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The variation in microbial analysis across different studies can make comparing/contrasting study findings difficult.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The majority of studies in the present review did not report power and sample size calculations.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- It may state two separate claims as one. 131
- Probably not a substantial claim. 71
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Calorie restriction, primarily in animals, can improve the composition and associated metabolism of the gut microbiota, including increasing the relative abundances of probiotic and butyrate-producing microbes [159] and increasing SCFA biosynthesis [160].”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [159] Zheng X, 2018, Front Med source
The citation to this source, [159], is attached to the increase in probiotic and butyrate-producing microbes, not to SCFA biosynthesis, which has a separate citation [160]. The review’s Abstract reports increased relative abundance of both groups following calorie restriction, and its Probiotic strains section describes this finding in CR-treated mammals. (LLM, conf=0.93)
- Partly supportedcites [160] Tanca A, 2018, Sci Rep sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Akkermansia fed to mice has a positive impact on reducing seizures, providing a potential mechanism for the observed neuroprotective effects of a ketogenic diet [66, 202].”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [66] Olson CA, 2018, Cell. source
- Could not verifycites [202] Gentile CL, 2015, Nutr J sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction (page unavailable) describes resistant starch, protein intake, and metabolic effects in women, not seizure reduction in mice. Searches for Akkermansia, seizures, and ketogenic-diet neuroprotection found no passage in our copy addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.75)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The majority of this research has been conducted in relation to the study of obesity, weight loss, and malnourishment in children.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Primer selection and hypervariable regions of 16S rRNA (i.e., V1-V9) influence the observed microbial community.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Several studies report less stringent inclusion/exclusion criteria and did not fully account/control for confounding variables.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“feces is the only sample material used in the analyses of the gut microbiota from the studies included in this review.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“several reports did not provide adequate detail in regard to sample transportation and storage.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Several studies in the present review did not provide adequate detail on sample collection and processing.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the effects of high-protein consumption (without concurrent high-fat) on gut bacteria are not well studied but of increasing importance given the current popularity of high-protein diets, especially in athletes.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Current microbiota sequencing methods rely heavily on 16S rRNA amplicon-based methodology which detects up to genus level with minimal capability for species-level detection.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Important factors such as age, birth method, antibiotic use, and diet have been established as formative factors that shape the gut microbiota.”
- Also stated in: § Introduction · plain
“Important factors such as age, birth delivery route, antibiotic use, and diet can shape the gut microbiota [7–10].”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Abstract
What the sources say
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Also stated in: § Introduction · plain
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The human gut microbiota contains thousands of different bacterial taxa as well as various archaea, eukaryotic microbes and viruses, more than three million genes, and harbors an enormous metabolic capacity [1, 2].”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction
What the sources say
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Moreover, confounding factors including training history, level of physical fitness, training environment, and dietary intake all have the potential to affect study outcomes substantially, and make detecting differences due to exercise/athletic regimens on the gut microbiota difficult to ascertain.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The athlete/exercise-associated gut microbiota
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“While athlete type did not differ regarding gut microbiota alpha and beta diversity, it was significantly associated with the relative abundance of several bacteria.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The athlete/exercise-associated gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [11] Jang LG, 2019, J Int Soc Sports Nutr source
plaincorrelationaln = 15- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Interestingly, total fat mass, serum lipids, C-reactive protein, depression scales, and smoking status were negatively associated (R2 = − 0.012 to − 0.256, P < 0.05) with microbiota diversity.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The athlete/exercise-associated gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [57] Morkl S, 2017, Int J Eat Disord source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“From the limited evidence, it appears that athletes harbor an increased abundance of functional pathways within the microbiome that are exploited by the host for potential health benefits, as well as carbohydrate degradation and secondary metabolite metabolism compared to control groups [60].”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The athlete/exercise-associated gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [60] Flint HJ, 2012, Gut Microbes source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Exercise type was associated with athlete diet patterns (i.e., bodybuilders: high-protein, high-fat, and low-carbohydrate/dietary fiber diet; distance runners: low-carbohydrate and low-dietary fiber diet).”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The athlete/exercise-associated gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [11] Jang LG, 2019, J Int Soc Sports Nutr source
plaincorrelationaln = 15- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The microbiota has an indirect influence on various indices of exercise performance, recovery, and patterns of illness, such as signaling through myokines and other cytokines, modulating activation of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis, and affecting performance-associated metabolic pathways [13, 16–18].”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Microbiota diversity was markedly lower in anorexia nervosa patients and obese participants compared to other groups, while athletes showed the highest alpha diversity (species richness).”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The athlete/exercise-associated gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [57] Morkl S, 2017, Int J Eat Disord source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Physical activity has been an area of growing interest in gut microbiota research and appears to promote a health-associated microbial community and increased metabolic functional potential.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > Influencing factors that shape the gut microbiota
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Exercise, associated dietary factors, and the athletic classification promote a more “health-associated” gut microbiota.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“However, these differences were observed despite no significant variation in dietary intakes across athletes from different classifications; suggesting that variations in training loads and competition requirements contributed to these microbiome and metabolome-related patterns.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The athlete/exercise-associated gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [58] O'Donovan CM, 2020, J Sci Med Sport source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Athletes participating in sports with a high dynamic component were the most distinct compositionally (greater differences in proportions of species; see Table 1), while athletes participating in sports with both a high dynamic and static component were the most functionally distinct (greater differences in functional potential).”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The athlete/exercise-associated gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [58] O'Donovan CM, 2020, J Sci Med Sport source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“For instance, at the genus level, Faecalibacterium, Sutterella, Clostridium, Haemophilus, and Eisenbergiella were the highest, while Bifidobacterium and Parasutterella were the lowest in bodybuilders.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The athlete/exercise-associated gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [11] Jang LG, 2019, J Int Soc Sports Nutr source
plaincorrelationaln = 15- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Current research reports a higher abundance of health-promoting bacterial species and increased microbial diversity in athletes [13, 18, 19].”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Physical exercise was not related to differences in the microbiota diversity or richness (the total number of OTUs or species recorded); however, sedentary parameters (i.e., sedentary time and breaks) correlated negatively with microbiota richness.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The athlete/exercise-associated gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [56] Bressa C, 2017, PLoS One source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In addition, Akkermansia was present in 30 out of 33 cyclists, with seven cyclists having relative abundances > 2% of this microbe in their metagenomic community.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The athlete/exercise-associated gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [18] Petersen LM, 2017, Microbiome. source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Fecal and urine derived metabolites also varied between classification including increased lactate (urine) in sports with a static component and creatinine (feces) in sports with a high dynamic and low static component.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The athlete/exercise-associated gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [58] O'Donovan CM, 2020, J Sci Med Sport source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A. muciniphilia is a mucin-degrading bacterium that resides in the nutrient-rich mucus layer of the gut that appears to be associated with positive metabolic function [59].”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The athlete/exercise-associated gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [59] Dao MC, 2016, Gut. source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Briefly, the health-related effects of butyrate are associated with anti-inflammatory properties, direct feeding of colonocytes, and an impact on satiety [64].”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of exercise on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [64] den Besten G, 2013, J Lipid Res source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Lambert et al. [75] described that exercised mice presented a greater abundance of Firmicutes species and lower Bacteroides/Prevotella genera compared with sedentary mice.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of exercise on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [75] Lambert JE, 2015, Appl Physiol Nutr Metab source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In particular, Choi et al. [73] reported that, in comparison to a sedentary control, mice with running wheel exercise had higher phylum Firmicutes but fewer phyla Tenericutes and Bacteroidetes, which attenuated changes in gut microbiota induced by oral exposure to the environmental toxin, polychlorinated biphenyls.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of exercise on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [73] Choi JJ, 2013, Environ Health Perspect source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“However, this is not always the same between studies [83, 84] and may be an oversimplification of phylum-level patterns in relation to host health.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of exercise on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Notably, butyrate, along with propionate and acetate, provides ~ 10% of the daily caloric requirements in humans who consume high (~ 60 g/day) amounts of dietary fiber [64].”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of exercise on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [64] den Besten G, 2013, J Lipid Res source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Matsumoto et al. [72] reported that regular running exercise in rats was related to an increase in butyrate-producing bacteria in the microbiota composition along with an increase of butyrate concentration.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of exercise on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [72] Matsumoto M, 2008, Biosci Biotechnol Biochem source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Further, mechanisms by which specific members of the microbiota, such as Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes, can affect human phenotypes remain to be fully elucidated [85].”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of exercise on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [85] Johnson EL, 2017, J Mol Med (Berl) source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“In contrast, Evans et al. [74] concluded that exercise increased Bacteroidetes, while it decreased Firmicutes in mice, implying that exercise plays an important role in prevention of diet-induced obesity producing a microbial composition similar to lean mice.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of exercise on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [74] Evans CC, 2014, PLoS One
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“One leading theory on the pathogenesis of obesity emphasizes a close link between the metabolic and immune systems via the gut microbiota [68].”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The athlete/exercise-associated gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [68] Cox AJ, 2015, Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Campbell et al. [88] asserted that exercised mice have bacteria related to Faecalibacterium prausnitzii which may protect the digestive tract by producing butyrate and lowering the oxygen tension in the lumen by a flavin/thiol electron shuttle.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of exercise on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [88] Campbell SC, 2016, PLoS One source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Barton et al. [13] speculated that the athlete gut microbiome may possess a functional capacity primed for tissue repair and a greater ability to harness energy from the diet with increased capacity for carbohydrate metabolism, cell structure, and nucleotide biosynthesis.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The athlete/exercise-associated gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [13] Barton W, 2018, Gut.
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“This body of work suggests that increased intestinal permeability from high-fat / high sugar diets allows bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS), an outer membrane component of gram-negative bacteria linked with induction of inflammation, from the gut microbiota to translocate into the systemic circulation, resulting in systemic endotoxemia.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The athlete/exercise-associated gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [68] Cox AJ, 2015, Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A. muciniphilia has also been found to be enriched in mice fed a ketogenic diet, exhibiting gut-brain functions including conferring seizure protection in two preclinical models for refractory epilepsy [66].”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The athlete/exercise-associated gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [66] Olson CA, 2018, Cell. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A. muciniphilia levels are decreased in obese and type 2 diabetic mice, and treatment with these bacteria reversed high-fat diet-induced metabolic disorders, including fat mass gain, metabolic endotoxemia, adipose tissue inflammation, and insulin resistance [65].”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The athlete/exercise-associated gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [65] Everard A, 2013, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“While the role of A. muciniphila is less certain in humans, it is depleted in individuals with several metabolic and inflammatory disorders.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The athlete/exercise-associated gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [59] Dao MC, 2016, Gut. source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It appears that being physically active is another important factor in the relationship between the microbiota and host metabolism.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The athlete/exercise-associated gut microbiota
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“Aerobic capacity was inversely associated with Eubacterium rectale-Clostridium coccoides but not with other bacteria.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of exercise on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [94] Yang Y, 2017, Nutrients. source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The relative abundance of the bacterial genus Veillonella increased after the marathon and was the most differentially abundant microbial feature between the pre- and post-exercise states.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of exercise on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [16] Scheiman J, 2019, Nat Med source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Participants with low VO2max had lower Bacteroides, but higher Eubacterium rectale-Clostridium coccoides than the high VO2max group.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of exercise on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [94] Yang Y, 2017, Nutrients. source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“At the genus level, half-marathon running reduced the abundance of fecal Ezakiella, Romboutsia, and Actinobacillus, but increased the abundance of Coprococcus and Ruminococcus bicirculans.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of exercise on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [20] Zhou Y, 2014, Genome Biol source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Coriobacteriaceae (phylum Actinobacteria) is involved in metabolism of bile salts and steroid hormones as well as activation of dietary polyphenols in the human gut [95].”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of exercise on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [95] Clavel T, 2014
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The bacterial abundance of Clostridiaceae and Bacteroidaceae families and Ruminoccocus genus were negatively associated with blood lactate levels in exercised animals, whereas a positive association was reported for Oscillospira genus [86].”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of exercise on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [86] Petriz BA, 2014, BMC Genomics source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The inverse relationship between VO2peak and LPS biosynthesis pathways implies a beneficial consequence of increased physical activity which may result in decreased LPS biosynthesis.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of exercise on the gut microbiota
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“VO2peak was inversely correlated with LPS biosynthesis and LPS biosynthesis proteins which were elevated among less fit participants.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of exercise on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [14] Estaki M, 2016, Microbiome. source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Coriobacteriaceae was correlated positively with 15 metabolites, indicating that metabolism of Coriobacteriaceae may be a potential mechanism underlying the role of exercise in preventing disease and improving health outcomes.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of exercise on the gut microbiota
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“According to the alpha diversity analysis, there were few differences in diversity, nevertheless, abundances of certain microbiota members showed differences before and after running.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of exercise on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [20] Zhou Y, 2014, Genome Biol source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“However, it was unclear if this effect was due to exercise, a high-protein diet, a combination of these two factors, or other factors [19].”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of exercise on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [19] Clarke SF, 2014, Gut. source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Further, ~ 20% of the variation in gut bacterial alpha diversity could be explained by VO2peak alone; in fact, VO2peak stood as the only variable that contributed significantly to increased alpha diversity.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of exercise on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [14] Estaki M, 2016, Microbiome. source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Alterations to the microbiota exerted by exercise in rats following a high-fat diet were different to rats on a normal diet [89], as well as the alterations produced in diabetic mice were different to their control counterparts [75].”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of exercise on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Collectively, these findings indicate that modulation of the microbiota by chronic exercise depends not only on the physiological state of the individual, but also on the diet.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of exercise on the gut microbiota
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Taken together, these experiments revealed that V. atypica improved run time via its metabolic conversion of exercise-induced lactate into propionate, thereby identifying a natural, microbiome-encoded enzymatic process that enhances athletic performance.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of exercise on the gut microbiota
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While performed in animal model, this research is notable as it took an important step from correlative to causal function, implicating athlete microbiomes for broader human health and performance applications.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of exercise on the gut microbiota
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It seems that the genus Veillonella is enriched in athletes after exercise and the metabolic pathway that Veillonella species utilize for lactate metabolism is also enriched.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of exercise on the gut microbiota
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Those that did respond showed a remarkable decrease in fasting insulin and Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance index values (− 42.70% and − 49.60%, respectively).”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of exercise on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [106] Liu Y, 2019, Cell Metab source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“This study supports the notion that gut microbiota composition is linked to exercise status and that exercised-induced changes may be temporary and require continual stimulus [100].”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of exercise on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [100] Hawley JA, 2019, Nat Rev Endocrinol source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A substantial improvement in mice gavaged with microbiota from responders was mimicked in glycemic control and insulin sensitivity, in contrast to the lack of change in mice colonized with microbiota from non-responders.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of exercise on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [106] Liu Y, 2019, Cell Metab source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The relative abundance of intestinal Bacteroides increased in subjects that completed aerobic exercise.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of exercise on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [103] Morita E, 2019, Nutrients. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The quote only partly states this claim.
In the paper
“the relative abundance of Clostridioides difficile decreased, whereas that of Oscillospira increased during exercise compared to the control period”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of exercise on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [101] Taniguchi H, 2018, Phys Rep
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“there was a clear segregation in compositional and functional changes between exercise responders and non-responders, accompanied by distinct alterations in microbial metabolites.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of exercise on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [106] Liu Y, 2019, Cell Metab source
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Exercise-induced modulations of the gut microbiota and SCFA were strongly associated with changes in body composition in lean participants and VO2max in obese participants, independent of diet.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of exercise on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [98] Allen JM, 2018, Med Sci Sports Exerc source
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“It appears microbial SCFAs influence blood pressure by interacting with host SCFA receptors [102].”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of exercise on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [102] Pluznick JL, 2017, Curr Hypertens Rep source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Beta diversity changed in all exercise groups compared to control, with participants in the vigorous intensity group showing decreased heterogeneity.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of exercise on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [108] Kern T, 2019, Int J Obes source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This connection is also supported by the observed shifts in metabolic capacity of the gut microbiota which may be transient and likely dependent on repeated exercise stimuli.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of exercise on the gut microbiota
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“It is widely accepted that lower levels of Bacteroides are associated with the higher prevalence of obesity and metabolic syndrome and that Bacteroides species may help in suppressing metabolic dysfunction [79, 104].”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of exercise on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
boostedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Higher levels of lactic acid in athletes’ GI tract favor the growth of this genus and these bacteria may in turn produce a compound that could aid performance.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of exercise on the gut microbiota
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In a pre-clinical crossover trial, Veillonella inoculated mice had a 13% improvement in time to exhaustion running tests as well as significant reductions in inflammatory cytokines post exercise compared to control.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of exercise on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [16] Scheiman J, 2019, Nat Med source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“therefore, the increased relative abundance observed after the 12-week exercise intervention may be due to its ability to shift substrates compared to other taxa that more reproducibly decline with a high-fat diet (i.e., Bifidobacteria).”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of exercise on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [105] Abenavoli L, 2019, Nutrients. source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Aerobic exercise also increases fecal SCFA concentration which can decrease pH in the colonic lumen [125].”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of exercise on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [125] Walker AW, 2005, Appl Environ Microbiol source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“increased intestinal permeability ensues, thought to be driven by the phosphorylation of several tight junction proteins [129].”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of exercise on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [129] Zuhl M, 2014, Br J Sports Med source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“These results highlight the importance of intestinal substrate uptake on the whole-body and changes, especially in glucose uptake, might have a positive effect on the gut microbiota.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of exercise on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [109] Motiani KK, 2019, Med Sci Sports Exerc source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“longer colonic transit time is associated with decreased gut microbiota diversity, which is paralleled by an increase in pH during transit from the proximal to the distal colon [116, 117].”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of exercise on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [116] Tottey W, 2017, J Neurogastroenterol Motil source
- Not checked yetcites [117] Abbas A, 2014, J Gastroenterol Hepatol Res
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“many of these microbial characteristics may be a result of ‘form fits function’, as communities in the gut are shaped by available resources, as determined by the physiology of their host.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of exercise on the gut microbiota
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“physically active individuals are more likely to be exposed to their environmental biosphere (e.g., time spent outdoors) and follow an overall healthy lifestyle and, consequently, harbor a richer microbiota.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of exercise on the gut microbiota
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Clostridium plays an important role in whole-body immune responses, while Blautia purportedly increases the release of proinflammatory cytokines [111].”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of exercise on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [111] Tuovinen E, 2013, Anaerobe. source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Bacteroidetes increased and the Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio decreased.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of exercise on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [109] Motiani KK, 2019, Med Sci Sports Exerc source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Intestinal ischemia may result, particularly in the setting of dehydration, manifesting as abdominal cramps, diarrhea, or occasionally bloody diarrhea [127].”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of exercise on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [127] de Oliveira EP, 2009, Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These and other potential adaptive mechanisms, such as a change in gut pH, may create an environmental setting that allows for richer community diversity and metabolic functions.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of exercise on the gut microbiota
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“metabolites that are a by-product of exercise and circulate throughout the body (e.g., lactate) may filter through the gut and serve as an energy source for certain bacterial taxa (e.g., Veillonella).”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of exercise on the gut microbiota
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“This increase occurred independent of any change in cardiorespiratory fitness, with VO2max similar pre- and post-race.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of exercise on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [99] Keohane DM, 2019, J Sci Med Sport source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Prolonged intestinal hypo-perfusion impairs mucosal homeostasis and causes enterocyte injury.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of exercise on the gut microbiota
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Changes in GI transit time have been reported to affect the pH within the colonic lumen which could lead to alterations in the composition of the gut microbiota.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of exercise on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [116] Tottey W, 2017, J Neurogastroenterol Motil source
- Not checked yetcites [117] Abbas A, 2014, J Gastroenterol Hepatol Res
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“colonic glucose concentrations associated positively with Bacteroidetes and inversely with Firmicutes phylum, the Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio, and Blautia genus.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of exercise on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [109] Motiani KK, 2019, Med Sci Sports Exerc source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Changes in essential amino acid availability influence hematopoiesis, which in turn may increase oxygen carrying capacity and cardiorespiratory fitness [112].”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of exercise on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [112] Ohtani M, 2006, J Nutr source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Athletes often consume a diet that differs from the general population with implications on the composition of the gut microbiome.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“athletes consume higher energy diets compared to sedentary individuals and are often encouraged to consume a diet high in carbohydrate and protein and lower in fat [140].”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [140] Kerksick CM, 2018, J Int Soc Sports Nutr source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Gnotobiotic mice are inefficient at processing food, yet when colonized with conventional mouse gut biota they gain weight by increasing their energy stores [152].”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [152] Turnbaugh PJ, 2006, Nature. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Nearly all studies included in this review have shown positive correlations between gut taxa and exercise. Overall exercise appears to enrich microbiota diversity, stimulate the proliferation of bacteria which can modulate mucosal immunity, improve barrier functions, and functional pathways capable of producing substances (e.g., butyrate and propionate) that can increase performance and health.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of exercise on the gut microbiota
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Studies of lean and obese mice indicate that the gut microbiota affects energy balance by influencing the efficiency of calorie harvest from the diet and how this harvested energy is used and stored.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“exercise appears to enrich microbiota diversity, stimulate the proliferation of bacteria which can modulate mucosal immunity, improve barrier functions, and stimulate bacteria and functional pathways capable of producing substances that protect against gastrointestinal disorders and improve performance (i.e., SCFAs).”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of exercise on the gut microbiota
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although these changes may not occur in a similar fashion across individuals and may also depend on baseline characteristics of both the microbiota and host.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of exercise on the gut microbiota
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Exercise induced shifts in metabolic capacity of the gut microbiota may be transient and likely dependent on repeated exercise stimuli.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of exercise on the gut microbiota
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“During training and competition, fiber intake may be reduced to avoid potential GI issues including gas and distension [141].”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [141] Tiller NB, 2019, J Int Soc Sports Nutr source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Medication and diet are principal environmental factors that influence gut microbiota composition according to large-cohort studies [135, 136].”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Strong evidence exists to support the role for the gut microbiota in energy balance by contributing to host digestive efficiency [151].”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [151] Scheithauer TP, 2016, Mol Metab source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Diet is an established modulator of gut microbiota composition, with significant alterations reported within 24 h of a dietary change [134].”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [134] David LA, 2014, Nature. source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Exercise may promote a rich bacterial community-induced shift in SCFA-producing taxa by providing selective advantage for the colonization of certain microbes, including A. muciniphila and Veillonella.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of exercise on the gut microbiota
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Generally, when comparing obese and lean individuals, both the diversity of the gut microbiota and the ratio of Bacteroidetes to Firmicutes is decreased in obese individuals [145].”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [145] Rosenbaum M, 2015, Trends Endocrinol Metab source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“the gut microbiota can also synthesize de novo amino acids and is involved in the utilization and catabolism of several amino acids originating from both alimentary and endogenous proteins. These amino acids can serve as precursors for the synthesis of other metabolites produced by the microbiota including SCFAs [139].”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [139] Neis EP, 2015, Nutrients. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Changes in host phenotype may be more dependent on the metabolic capacity and metabolites of the microbiota, instead of strictly microbial composition.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of exercise on the gut microbiota
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“the gut microbiota plays an important role in energy extraction and, in turn, can be influenced by the composition of the diet and the amount of energy entering this environment [145].”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [145] Rosenbaum M, 2015, Trends Endocrinol Metab source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“rats fed a high-energy dense diet rapidly altered their gut microbiota with increases in Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio and in pro-inflammatory Proteobacteria proliferation compared to those consuming a low-energy diet [154].”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [154] Vaughn AC, 2017, Acta Neurobiol Exp source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Changes in the gut microbiota exerted by exercise seem to depend on the physiological state of the individual.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of exercise on the gut microbiota
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Gene content/diversity in the gut may be a better predictor of physiological states compared to species richness.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of exercise on the gut microbiota
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Prolonged excessive exercise has a deleterious influence on intestinal function, including increased intestinal permeability.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of exercise on the gut microbiota
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Higher cardiorespiratory fitness (as measured by VO2peak) appears to be correlated positively with increases in microbial diversity and metabolic function, and increases in the SCFA butyrate.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of exercise on the gut microbiota
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Moderate endurance exercise in mice has been associated with a lesser degree of intestinal permeability, preservation of mucous thickness, and lower rates of bacterial translocation along with up-regulated anti-microbial protein production and gene expression in small intestinal tissue (α-defensin, β-defensin, Reg IIIb and Reg IIIc) [131].”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of exercise on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [131] Luo B, 2014, Brain Behav Immun source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“During an in-patient, medically supervised weight gain study in anorexic individuals, microbial richness increased, however perturbations in intestinal microbiota and SCFA profiles, in addition to several gastrointestinal symptoms, did not recover during the subject’s in-patient stay [169].”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [169] Mack I, 2016, Sci Rep source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“a study of five male volunteers consuming high intakes of animal protein showed that fecal sulfide production is related to meat intake [176]; notably, hydrogen sulfide is a compound associated with ulcerative colitis [177].”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
plaincorrelationaln = 5- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Changes such as reduced abundance of Firmicutes post-surgery have been reported [162].”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [162] Rejeh N, 2008, Int Nurs Rev source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Several studies of anorexia nervosa patients have reported decreased abundances of the butyrate producing Roseburia in combination with reduced butyrate levels and lower microbial diversity and taxa abundance compared to healthy controls [168–170].”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Different dietary patterns affecting macronutrient consumption can alter the composition of what enters the large intestine where there is the greatest density of gut microbes.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Relative Energy Deficiency in Sports (RED-S) syndrome is present in many athletic disciplines as a result of insufficient energy availability due to insufficient caloric intake and/or excessive energy expenditure [158].”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [158] Mountjoy M, 2014, Br J Sports Med source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“While this ratio was negatively correlated with body weight, BMI, and body fat mass, the correlation was highly dependent on total calorie intake.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [163] Furet JP, 2010, Diabetes. source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“This ‘immaturity’ was greater in those more severely malnourished with probable physiologic, metabolic, and immunologic consequences [165].”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [165] Subramanian S, 2014, Nature. source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Treatment with the milk oligosaccharides produced microbiota-dependent growth promotion, including lean body mass gain, changed bone morphology, and altered liver, muscle and brain metabolism.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [166] Charbonneau MR, 2016, Cell. source
plaindirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“it is difficult (if not impossible) to solely investigate the impact of total energy consumption on the composition of the gut microbiota without considering dietary variability such as the major dietary macronutrient classes.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“This categorization has been criticized as an oversimplification, obscuring potentially important microbial variation, and may not be appropriate for the athletic population [180, 181].”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“These preclinical models indicate a causal, microbiota-dependent relationship between nutrition and growth promotion which may have implications for younger athletes.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [166] Charbonneau MR, 2016, Cell. source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Findings from animal models (mice, piglets) can be extrapolated to humans, including athletes.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This has a tremendous impact on the human body’s ability to extract and utilize energy from the diet.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Overall, energy balance is an overlooked factor in relation to the athletic gut microbiota.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Furet and colleagues [163] reported that the Bacteroides/Prevotella ratio increased within 3 months after surgery and remained stable thereafter.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [163] Furet JP, 2010, Diabetes. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This finding suggests that the microbiota is responsive to energy balance (degree of overfeeding) as well as actual adiposity.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
hedgeddirectn = 9- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“This has led to the proposal that disrupted microbiota development impairs healthy bone and muscle growth during infancy [166].”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [166] Charbonneau MR, 2016, Cell. source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“The higher caloric load was positively correlated with the relative abundance of Firmicutes species and negatively correlated with the relative abundance of Bacteroidetes species in both lean and obese humans.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [157] Jumpertz R, 2011, Am J Clin Nutr source
plaincorrelationaln = 9- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Occurring in both males and females, RED-S possesses a significant health risk.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [158] Mountjoy M, 2014, Br J Sports Med source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Changes to the gut microbiota have also been documented when dietary protein is increased: Bacteroides spp. are highly associated with animal proteins, whereas Prevotella spp. are highly associated with increased intakes of plant proteins [172].”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [172] Wu GD, 2011, Science. source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Ma et al. [178] suggested that excessive protein intake or an unsuitable ratio of protein to protein-fermenting bacteria, could potentially produce adverse effects on health.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [178] Ma N, 2017, Curr Protein Pept Sci
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“David et al. [134] showed a rapid shift in gut microbial community composition and increased populations of Alistipes, Bilophila, and Bacteroides after consuming a high-fat/protein diet for 5 days and these changes were thought to be a result of increased bile secretion.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [134] David LA, 2014, Nature. source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The inconsistency of these results compared to Clarke et al. [19] may relate to the nutritional status of the athletes.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“In cross-country runners, the effect of 10 weeks of protein supplementation (10 g whey isolate and 10 g beef hydrolysate per day) consumed daily decreased SCFA-producing bacteria while increasing bacteria with proteolytic activity in the microbiota without affecting SCFAs, ammonia, or fecal pH of endurance athletes [196].”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [196] Moreno-Perez D, 2018, Double-Blind Pilot Study Nutrients
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Specifically, protein supplementation increased the abundance of the Bacteroidetes phylum and decreased the presence of health-related taxa including Roseburia, Blautia, and B. longum.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [196] Moreno-Perez D, 2018, Double-Blind Pilot Study Nutrients
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“While there is strong evidence showing that BCAAs do not enhance exercise performance [192, 193], they may reduce central fatigue [194] and attenuate muscle damage during prolonged exercise [195].”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“These saccharolytic organisms persist in fibrolytic gut communities and are considered an important component of a healthy gut microbiota, while their depletion has been observed in inflammatory bowel disease patients [189, 190].”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“These microbial features not only positively correlate with the athletes’ levels of physical activity, but also the quantity of dietary protein consumed.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [13] Barton W, 2018, Gut.
- Not checked yetcites [19] Clarke SF, 2014, Gut. source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In professional rugby players, distinct compositional and functional microbial characteristics, including increased alpha diversity, enhanced microbial production of SCFAs, and greater metabolic capacity are evident in the gut [13, 19].”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [13] Barton W, 2018, Gut.
- Not checked yetcites [19] Clarke SF, 2014, Gut. source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Increases in dietary protein can increase the amounts reaching the colon, where they are metabolized by colonic microbiota, leading to changes in microbiota populations and in microbial metabolites [178].”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [178] Ma N, 2017, Curr Protein Pept Sci
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“the Bacteroides enterotype has been suggested to most strongly be correlated with frequent consumption of animal protein and saturated fat.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [172] Wu GD, 2011, Science. source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Clarke et al. [19] reported microbiota diversity indices correlated positively with protein intake and serum creatine kinase indicating that diet and exercise are both drivers of biodiversity in the gut.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [19] Clarke SF, 2014, Gut. source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“whey protein has been associated with reductions in body weight and increased insulin sensitivity in the past, and is frequently a major component of the athlete diet, particularly in strength and power sports [186, 187].”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“High levels of BCAAs (leucine, isoleucine, and valine) can attenuate exercise-induced muscle fatigue and promote muscle-protein synthesis [192].”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [192] Negro M, 2008, J Sports Med Phys Fitness
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Long-term diets have been linked to certain compositional clusters in the gut microbiota: protein and animal fat are associated with Bacteroides enrichment and simple carbohydrates with Prevotella enrichment [172].”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [172] Wu GD, 2011, Science. source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It seems that high-protein diets may have a negative impact on gut microbiota diversity for athletes in endurance sports who consume lower amounts of energy, carbohydrates, and dietary fiber, while athletes in resistance sports that follow a high-protein, low-carbohydrate, and high-fat diet demonstrate a decrease in SCFA-producing commensal bacteria.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The difference between these two studies may also be due to differences in analyses, as Clarke et al. [19] only assessed the V4 region of the gene, while the present study used the V3 and V4 region (see Table 4).”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [19] Clarke SF, 2014, Gut. source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In contrast to Clarke et al. [19], no changes in compositional microbiota diversity were detected after the ten-week intervention, which may relate to the low percentage of protein intake.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [19] Clarke SF, 2014, Gut. source
- Not checked yetcites [196] Moreno-Perez D, 2018, Double-Blind Pilot Study Nutrients
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Since BCAAs are not produced by the human body and need to come from the diet, having a gut microbial community that contains Prevotella spp. to either synthesize BCAAs or alternatively influence other microbes to produce these amino acids would be highly beneficial to athletes who require a rapid recovery from intense exercise.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“the study by Clarke and colleagues [19] met all of the recommended dietary intake requirements, while the athletes in the investigation by Jang et al. [11] had insufficient carbohydrate and dietary fiber intake (compared to standard macronutrient distribution ranges).”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“a ketogenic diet alters gut microbiota composition leading to an increase in Akkermansia abundance.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“These recommendations aim to support rapid gastric emptying, water and nutrient absorption and adequate perfusion of the splanchnic vasculature [221].”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [221] Jeukendrup AE, 2017, Sports Med source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Nutritional strategies (i.e., avoiding fat and fiber) have been recommended to reduce the risk of GI distress before and during training and competition [220].”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [220] Thomas DT, 2016, Med Sci Sports Exerc source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“In comparison to bacteria, humans have much fewer enzymes to break down carbohydrates [203] and what can be digested by these enzymes is absorbed in the small intestine.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [203] Martens EC, 2016, Nature. source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Prevotella has been noted to be associated with several disease states.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [214] Liu Y, 2016, Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol source
- Not checked yetcites [215] Moreno-Indias I, 2016, Am J Transl Res
- Not checked yetcites [216] Michail S, 2015, FEMS Microbiol Ecol source
- Not checked yetcites [217] Li J, 2017, Microbiome. source
- Not checked yetcites [218] Chen W, 2012, PLoS One
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“this change was mirrored in the combined exercise and protein supplementation group, suggesting a robust positive effect of whey protein on the taxonomic richness of the gut virome.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [199] Cronin O, Barton W, Skuse P, Penney NC, Garcia-Perez I, Murphy EF, et al. A Prospective Metagenomic and Metabolomic Analysis of the Impact of Exercise and/or Whey Protein Supplementation on the Gut Microbiome of Sedentary Adults. mSystems. 2018;3(3) https://doi.org/10.1128/mSystems.00044-18. source
hedgeddirectn = 30- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“enterotype assignment to the Prevotella group has been suggested to be associated with high-fiber diets.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [172] Wu GD, 2011, Science. source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Dietary fiber passes undigested from the small intestine into the colonic environment [171] and the gut microbiota relies on these fibers for energy, which they target for disassembly with a combined ‘toolkit’ of thousands of enzymes [204].”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“adding fiber, including resistant starch, to high protein diets may help reduce potential negative effects of high protein consumption [222] and may increase fat oxidation [202], further illustrating the importance of consuming adequate dietary fiber for gut and overall health.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Previous microbiome studies have repeatedly identified significant correlations of both diet and geographic location to abundances of Prevotella or Bacteroides.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Increased intake of dietary fiber does not have an overall Bifidobacterium increasing effect, however, specific dietary fibers have been shown to selectively increase Bifidobacteria abundance [205].”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [205] Simpson HL, 2015, Aliment Pharmacol Ther source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Prevotella has been shown to be higher in patients with depression [214], insulin resistance [215], non-alcoholic fatty liver disease [216, 217], hypertension [217], and colon cancer [218].”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These seemingly opposing effects of high-protein diets imply that protein-diet interactions are modulated by factors such as host body composition and exercise intensity.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The types and amounts of fats consumed in each of these studies are also likely important for the overall effects on the gut microbiota.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“While changes in abundances of Bacteroides or Prevotella genera were not observed in either group, the high-fiber, low-fat diets enriched bacterial genes for butyrate production and decreased genes for secondary bile acid synthesis, emphasizing the importance of identifying functional rather than compositional shifts.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [207] O'Keefe SJ, 2015, Nat Commun source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Proteins from vegetable origin have a marked effect on gut microbiota but currently require investigation in athletes.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“and improved overall health (unless over-trained or in RED-S).”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Conclusion
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In a rodent study, animals fed lard showed increases in Bacteroides and displayed signs of metabolic dysfunction.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [229] Caesar R, 2015, Cell Metab source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Diet is an established modulator of gut microbiota composition and activity, with marked changes in microbiota composition evident within 24 h of a dietary change.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Diet is an established modulator of gut microbiota composition and activity, with marked changes in microbiota composition evident within 24 h of a dietary change.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Higher intake of carbohydrate and dietary fiber in athletes appear to be associated with increased abundance of Prevotella.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Faecalibacterium is widely recognized for its production of a suite of metabolites and peptides with anti-inflammatory effects [231].”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [231] Sokol H, 2008, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While individuals’ microbiotas appear to be driven by their primary dietary patterns”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Conclusion
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In contrast, animals fed fish oil showed increased levels of lactic acid bacteria and were protected from metabolic dysfunction [229].”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [229] Caesar R, 2015, Cell Metab source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Increased intake of dietary fiber is associated with microbial richness and/or diversity.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Protein intake appears to be a strong modulator of microbiota diversity, with protein supplementation, such as whey, showing potential benefits that need further study in humans.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“in support of purported links between SCFAs and numerous metabolic benefits and a lean phenotype [61–63].”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“has been linked to a host of metabolic products with anti-inflammatory effects [231].”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [231] Sokol H, 2008, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper relies on this without support.
High-level athletes possess remarkable physiological and metabolic adaptations compared to sedentary individuals.
“High-level athletes possess remarkable physiological and metabolic adaptations (including muscular strength/power, aerobic capacity, energy expenditure, and heat production) and provide unique insight in gut microbiome research.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Many gut microbiota studies may be underpowered and may not control for important confounding variables such as diet, gender, ethnicity, GI problems, and antibiotics.
“Furthermore, many gut microbiota studies may be underpowered, and scientists may not be controlling for important confounding variables such as diet, gender, ethnicity, GI problems, antibiotics, etc.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The role of exercise and associated factors and stressors on the gut microbiota has been less well described.
“The role that exercise plays, in particular the associated factors and stressors, such as sport/exercise-specific diet [11], environment [12], and their interactions, on the gut microbiota have been less well described.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Athletes exemplify exercise, dietary, and athletic factors on a generally consistent and long-term basis.
“Athletes, although diverse as a population given the wide variety of different types of exercise/fitness/athletic training, competition, dietary practices and attributes, exemplify these factors on a generally consistent and long-term basis.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Findings from animal models (mice, piglets) can be extrapolated to humans, including athletes.
“These preclinical models indicate a causal, microbiota-dependent relationship between nutrition and growth promotion which may have implications for younger athletes.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The gut microbiota composition measured in feces reflects the gut microbiota throughout the GI tract.
“feces is the only sample material used in the analyses of the gut microbiota from the studies included in this review.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Dietary protein effects on gut microbiota observed in non-athletes apply to athletes.
“It seems that high-protein diets may have a negative impact on gut microbiota diversity for athletes in endurance sports who consume lower amounts of energy, carbohydrates, and dietary fiber, while athletes in resistance sports that follow a high-protein, low-carbohydrate, and high-fat diet demonstrate a decrease in SCFA-producing commensal bacteria.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The studies reviewed are sufficiently comparable to draw general conclusions about diet and gut microbiota.
“The variation in microbial analysis across different studies can make comparing/contrasting study findings difficult.”
The paper relies on this without support.
LPS can be incorporated into lipid micelles formed during fat digestion.
“LPS can be incorporated into lipid micelles formed during fat digestion”
The paper relies on this without support.
Certain gut microbes may be important in regulating the incorporation of LPS into lipid micelles.
“and certain gut microbes may be important in regulating this process.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Thus, modulation of microbiota by means of probiotic/prebiotic supplementation has shown to ameliorate oxidative stress and inflammation and to improve performance in certain athletic populations but more rigorous studies are needed [92,93,94].”
From The 4R’s Framework of Nutritional Strategies for Post-Exercise Recovery: A Review with Emphasis on New Generation of Carbohydrates (2020) · cites this paper as [94]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated major: it would touch a result — a value a result rests on, reported and recomputed p-values on opposite sides of the significance level, two passages that conflict with no sign which is right, or a cited work retracted before this paper was published.
In the paper
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of exercise on the gut microbiota
“• Decrease in beta diversity of the gut virome in participants consuming protein.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
“Individuals in the whey protein supplementation-only group experienced a significant increase in the beta diversity of the gut virome.”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of exercise on the gut microbiota
“To investigate the effect of an acute exercise bout in athletes, Zhao et al. [20] examined the fecal metabolites and microbiota in 20 amateur runners before and after a half-marathon race using metabolomics and 16S rRNA sequencing analysis.”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > References
“20. Zhou Y Mihindukulasuriya KA Gao H La Rosa PS Wylie KM Martin JC Exploration of bacterial community classes in major human habitats Genome Biol 2014 15 5 R66”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ The athletic gut microbiota > Introduction > The effect of athletic diet on the gut microbiota
“Changes such as reduced abundance of Firmicutes post-surgery have been reported [162].”
§ The athletic gut microbiota > References
“162. Rejeh N Ahmadi F Mohammadi E Anoosheh M Kazemnejad A Barriers to, and facilitators of post-operative pain management in Iranian nursing: a qualitative research study Int Nurs Rev 2008 55 4 468 475”
Citations
Cites
Items 201–245 of 245
Butteiger, D. N., Hibberd, A. A., McGraw, N. J., Napawan, N., Hall-Porter, J. M., & Krul, E. S. (2016) · The Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.3945/jn.115.224196 · Cited by 116 · cited 1×
“Evidence indicates proteins from vegetable origin have a more marked effect on microbial diversity than animal proteins [201], however investigation in athletes is needed.”
BackgroundToden, S., Bird, A. R., Topping, D. L., & Conlon, M. A. (2006) · Cancer Biology & Therapy · doi:10.4161/cbt.5.3.2382 · Cited by 113 · cited 1×
“reduce potential negative effects of high protein consumption [222] and may increase fat oxidation [202],”
BackgroundKemppainen, K. M., Ardissone, A. N., Davis‐Richardson, A. G., Fagen, J. R., Gano, K. A., León‐Novelo, L., Vehik, K., Casella, G., Simell, O., Ziegler, A. G., et al. (2014) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc14-0850 · Cited by 113
Four men in a boat: Ultra-endurance exercise alters the gut microbiome
Keohane, D. M., Woods, T., O’Connor, P., Underwood, S., Cronin, O., Whiston, R., O'Sullivan, O., Cotter, P., Shanahan, F., & Molloy, M. G. M. (2019) · Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport · doi:10.1016/j.jsams.2019.04.004 · Cited by 113 · cited 7×
“Barton et al., 2018, Ireland [13] Professional male rugby players, n = 40, 29 ± 4 years; Healthy matched controls, n = 46, 29 ± 6 years Cross-sectional Metagenomic whole genome shotgun sequencing and urine and fecal metabolomics Observational Crosssectional • Relative increase in pathways (amino acid and antibiotic bi…”
BackgroundInfluentialLira, F. S., Rosa, J. C., Pimentel, G. D., Souza, H. A., Caperuto, E. C., Carnevali, L. C., Seelaender, M., Damaso, A. R., Oyama, L. M., de Mello, M. T., et al. (2010) · Lipids in Health and Disease · doi:10.1186/1476-511x-9-82 · Cited by 112 · cited 14×
“Moreover, the high-energy diet increased circulating pro-inflammatory LPS.”
BackgroundInfluential(2008) · PubMed · Cited by 111
Jäger, R., Shields, K. A., Lowery, R. P., De Souza, E. O., Partl, J. M., Hollmer, C., Purpura, M., & Wilson, J. M. (2016) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.2276 · Cited by 111
Self-citationMcAllan, L., Skuse, P., Cotter, P. D., Connor, P. O., Cryan, J. F., Ross, R. P., Fitzgerald, G., Roche, H. M., & Nilaweera, K. N. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0088904 · Cited by 106
The Effects of Dietary Pattern during Intensified Training on Stool Microbiota of Elite Race Walkers
Murtaza, N., Burke, L. M., Vlahovich, N., Charlesson, B., O’ Neill, H., Ross, M. L., Campbell, K. L., Krause, L., & Morrison, M. (2019) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu11020261 · Cited by 96 · cited 5×
“Similarly, Murtaza and colleagues [230] completed a three-week diet intervention in elite race walkers undertaking intensified training combined with a ketogenic, low-carbohydrate, high-fat diet (LCHF; < 50 g day carbohydrate; 78% energy as fat; 2.”
BackgroundInfluentialExercise and training effects on gastric emptying of carbohydrate beverages
REHRER, N. J., BECKERS, E., BROUNS, F., HOOR, F. T., & SARIS, W. H. M. (1989) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/00005768-198910000-00008 · Cited by 92
Gastric emptying during walking and running: effects of varied exercise intensity
Neufer, P. D., Young, A. J., & Sawka, M. N. (1989) · European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology · doi:10.1007/bf00643522 · Cited by 91
Butyrate modulates intestinal epithelial cell-mediated neutrophil migration
Böcker, U., Nebe, T., Herweck, F., Holt, L. C., Panja, A. B., Jobin, C., Rossol, S., Sartor, R. B., & SINGER, M. V. (2003) · Clinical & Experimental Immunology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2249.2003.02056.x · Cited by 91 · cited 1×
“One possible mechanism behind these associations may be derived from the observation that butyrate, which was more abundant among participants with higher cardiorespiratory fitness, can modulate neutrophil chemotaxis [91].”
BackgroundThe measurement of production rates of volatile fatty acids in the caecum of the conscious rabbit
Parker, D. S. (1976) · British Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1079/bjn19760058 · Cited by 90 · cited 1×
“colon represent between 10 and 30% of total ingested energy [143, 144].”
BackgroundIs the GI System Built For Exercise?
GISOLFI, C. V. (2000) · Physiology · doi:10.1152/physiologyonline.2000.15.3.114 · Cited by 84 · cited 1×
“Simultaneously, intrinsic adaptations to endurance training, such as decreased blood flow, tissue hypoxia, and increased transit and absorptive capacity can lead to changes in the GI tract [114, 115].”
BackgroundRoelofsen, H., Priebe, M., & Vonk, R. (2010) · Beneficial Microbes · doi:10.3920/bm2010.0028 · Cited by 80 · cited 1×
“SCFAs can improve skeletal muscle insulin sensitivity [224], reduce inflammation [225], and regulate satiety [226], all of which may contribute to the improvements in body composition observed in this study.”
BackgroundComparison of the Gut Microbiotas of Healthy Adult Twins Living in South Korea and the United States
Lee, S., Sung, J., Lee, J.-E., & Ko, G. (2011) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.05490-11 · Cited by 79
Mack, I., Penders, J., Cook, J., Dugmore, J., Mazurak, N., & Enck, P. (2018) · Current Neuropharmacology · doi:10.2174/1570159x16666180118101354 · Cited by 79 · cited 1×
“being characterized by heterogeneity in the methodology and small sample sizes (for review see: [167]).”
BackgroundTanca, A., Abbondio, M., Palomba, A., Fraumene, C., Marongiu, F., Serra, M., Pagnozzi, D., Laconi, E., & Uzzau, S. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-33100-y · Cited by 79 · cited 1×
“producing microbes [159] and increasing SCFA biosynthesis [160].”
BackgroundJacobs, K. A., & Sherman, W. M. (1999) · International Journal of Sport Nutrition · doi:10.1123/ijsn.9.1.92 · Cited by 77 · cited 1×
“Endurance athletes are well known to follow diets that result in the consumption of high amounts of both simple and complex carbohydrates [208, 209].”
BackgroundHabitual exercise program protects murine intestinal, skeletal, and cardiac muscles against aging
Rosa, E. F., Silva, A. C., Ihara, S. S. M., Mora, O. A., Aboulafia, J., & Nouailhetas, V. L. A. (2005) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00417.2005 · Cited by 77 · cited 1×
“Simultaneously, intrinsic adaptations to endurance training, such as decreased blood flow, tissue hypoxia, and increased transit and absorptive capacity can lead to changes in the GI tract [114, 115].”
BackgroundCytokine response of human mononuclear cells induced by intestinal Clostridium species
Tuovinen, E., Keto, J., Nikkilä, J., Mättö, J., & Lähteenmäki, K. (2013) · Anaerobe · doi:10.1016/j.anaerobe.2012.11.002 · Cited by 75 · cited 1×
“Clostridium plays an important role in wholebody immune responses, while Blautia purportedly increases the release of proinflammatory cytokines [111].”
BackgroundLuo, B., Xiang, D., Nieman, D. C., & Chen, P. (2014) · Brain, Behavior, and Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.bbi.2013.11.013 · Cited by 74 · cited 1×
“Moderate endurance exercise in mice has been associated with a lesser degree of intestinal permeability, preservation of mucous thickness, and lower rates of bacterial translocation along with up-regulated anti-microbial protein production and gene expression in small intestinal tissue (α-defensin, β-defensin, Reg III…”
BackgroundYang, Y., Shi, Y., Wiklund, P., Tan, X., Wu, N., Zhang, X., Tikkanen, O., Zhang, C., Munukka, E., & Cheng, S. (2017) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu9080792 · Cited by 72 · cited 5×
“, 2017, Finland [94] Premenopausal females with low, moderate and highcardiorespiratory fitness (VO2max), n = 71, Low VO2max: 40.”
BackgroundInfluentialUptake and Metabolism of the Short-Chain Fatty Acid Butyrate, a Critical Review of the Literature
M. Astbury, S., & M. Corfe, B. (2012) · Current Drug Metabolism · doi:10.2174/138920012800840428 · Cited by 67 · cited 1×
“Additionally, SCFAs are also energy substrates for numerous tissue types, including the colon [227], adipose [228] and muscle tissues [224], indicating that SCFAs can contribute to enhanced energy harvest from the diet, ultimately providing support to healthy tissue growth and turnover.”
BackgroundLiang, Y., Dong, T., Chen, M., He, L., Wang, T., Liu, X., Chang, H., Mao, J., Hang, B., Snijders, A. M., et al. (2020) · mSphere · doi:10.1128/msphere.00763-19 · Cited by 66
Gentile, C. L., Ward, E., Holst, J. J., Astrup, A., Ormsbee, M. J., Connelly, S., & Arciero, P. J. (2015) · Nutrition Journal · doi:10.1186/s12937-015-0104-2 · Cited by 65 · cited 2×
“Moreover, Akkermansia fed to mice has a positive impact on reducing seizures, providing a potential mechanism for the observed neuroprotective effects of a ketogenic diet [66, 202].”
BackgroundSelf-citationEffect of heavy exercise on gastrointestinal transit in endurance athletes
Strid, H., Simrén, M., Störsrud, S., Stotzer, P.-O., & Sadik, R. (2011) · Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.3109/00365521.2011.558110 · Cited by 65
Calorie restriction and its impact on gut microbial composition and global metabolism
Zheng, X., Wang, S., & Jia, W. (2018) · Frontiers of Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11684-018-0670-8 · Cited by 65 · cited 1×
“producing microbes [159] and increasing SCFA biosynthesis [160].”
BackgroundAmino Acid Mixture Improves Training Efficiency in Athletes
Ohtani, M., Sugita, M., & Maruyama, K. (2006) · The Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1093/jn/136.2.538s · Cited by 58 · cited 1×
“Changes in essential amino acid availability influence hematopoiesis, which in turn may increase oxygen carrying capacity and cardiorespiratory fitness [112].”
BackgroundThe Gut Microbiome, Energy Homeostasis, and Implications for Hypertension
Riedl, R. A., Atkinson, S. N., Burnett, C. M. L., Grobe, J. L., & Kirby, J. R. (2017) · Current Hypertension Reports · doi:10.1007/s11906-017-0721-6 · Cited by 58 · cited 1×
“[148] estimated that for an average 90 kg male, the biomass of bacteria in the gut could be expected to contribute anywhere from 7 to 22% of daily adult human caloric turnover (based on 2000 kcal [kcal] per day).”
BackgroundMicrobiota and muscle highway — two way traffic
Hawley, J. A. (2020) · Nature Reviews Endocrinology · doi:10.1038/s41574-019-0291-6 · Cited by 57 · cited 1×
“This study supports the notion that gut microbiota composition is linked to exercise status and that exercised-induced changes may be temporary and require continual stimulus [100].”
ResultDuffy, L. C., Raiten, D. J., Hubbard, V. S., & Starke-Reed, P. E. (2015) · Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.3945/jn.114.194936 · Cited by 54
Effect of exercise on postprandial gastric secretion and emptying in humans
Feldman, M., & Nixon, J. V. I. (1982) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/jappl.1982.53.4.851 · Cited by 52
Exercise, fitness, and the gut
Cronin, O., Molloy, M. G., & Shanahan, F. (2016) · Current Opinion in Gastroenterology · doi:10.1097/mog.0000000000000240 · Cited by 47 · cited 1×
“The microorganisms in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract play a role in nutrient uptake, vitamin synthesis, energy harvest, inflammatory modulation, and host immune response [3, 4].”
BackgroundWhey Protein Reduces Early Life Weight Gain in Mice Fed a High-Fat Diet
Tranberg, B., Hellgren, L. I., Lykkesfeldt, J., Sejrsen, K., Jeamet, A., Rune, I., Ellekilde, M., Nielsen, D. S., & Hansen, A. K. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0071439 · Cited by 46
Maffetone, P. B., & Laursen, P. B. (2016) · Sports Medicine - Open · doi:10.1186/s40798-016-0048-x · Cited by 46 · cited 17×
“While Clarke et al. [19] and Barton et al. [13] compared the gut microbiome of athletes to matched controls considered overweight by BMI, future work should also investigate this comparison at the obese classification.”
BackgroundInfluentialAvolio, E., Gualtieri, P., Romano, L., Pecorella, C., Ferraro, S., Palma, G., Di Renzo, L., & De Lorenzo, A. (2020) · Current Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.2174/0929867326666190326113607 · Cited by 43 · cited 1×
“Clearly, the gut microbiota-host interaction can affect energy balance which has implications for weight gain or loss and body composition [149, 150].”
BackgroundWilliams, B. A., Zhang, D., Lisle, A. T., Mikkelsen, D., McSweeney, C. S., Kang, S., Bryden, W. L., & Gidley, M. J. (2015) · Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.nut.2015.10.008 · Cited by 42
Gut microbiota: implications for sports and exercise medicine
Cronin, O., O’Sullivan, Ó., Barton, W., Cotter, P. D., Molloy, M. G., & Shanahan, F. (2017) · British Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1136/bjsports-2016-097225 · Cited by 40 · cited 1×
“the diverse, metabolically favorable intestinal microbiota evident in the elite athlete is the cumulative manifestation of many years of high nutrient intake and high degrees of physical activity and training throughout youth, adolescence, and during adult participation in high-level sports [133].”
BackgroundRejeh, N., Ahmadi, F., Mohammadi, E., Anoosheh, M., & Kazemnejad, A. (2008) · International Nursing Review · doi:10.1111/j.1466-7657.2008.00659.x · Cited by 38 · cited 1×
“Changes such as reduced abundance of Firmicutes post-surgery have been reported [162].”
BackgroundCarbon dioxide fixation by Veillonella parvula M4 and its relation to propionic acid formation
Ng, S. K. C., & Hamilton, I. R. (1973) · Canadian Journal of Microbiology · doi:10.1139/m73-116 · Cited by 37 · cited 1×
“lactate into the SCFA acetate and propionate via the methylmalonyl-CoA pathway [97].”
BackgroundEffects of Preexercise Carbohydrate Ingestion on Mountain Bike Performance
CRAMP, T., BROAD, E., MARTIN, D., & MEYER, B. J. (2004) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/01.mss.0000139805.91675.5b · Cited by 23 · cited 26×
“However, Prevotella has been noted to be associated with several disease states.”
BackgroundInfluentialMartens, E. C. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/529158a · Cited by 20
Does Colonic Transit Time Affect Colonic pH?
Abbas, A. H., Wilding, G. E., Semler, J., & Sitrin, M. (2010) · The American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.14309/00000434-201010001-00333 · Cited by 11
Impact of Nutrition on the Gut Microbiota
Ishiguro, E. E., Haskey, N., & Campbell, K. (2018) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-810541-2.00006-3 · Cited by 8
Research works printed but not linked: 23
- Dudek-Wicher RK, 2018, Prz Gastroenterol, 13, 85
- Bermon S, 2015, Exerc Immunol Rev, 21, 70
- Barton W, 2018, Gut., 67, 625
- O'Sullivan A, 2015, Nutr Metab Insights, 8, 1
- Ishiguro E, 2018, Gut microbiota: interactive effects of nutrition and health: Elsevier
- Rodriguez JM, 2015, Microb Ecol Health Dis, 26, 26050
- Barb JJ, 2016, PLoS One, 11
- Liu Z, 2008, Nucleic Acids Res, 36
- Khan MJ, 2016, J Obes, 2016, 7353642
- Evans CC, 2014, PLoS One, 9
- Larsen N, 2010, PLoS One, 5
- Queipo-Ortuno MI, 2013, PLoS One, 8
- Clavel T, 2014, The prokaryotes
- Taniguchi H, 2018, Phys Rep, 6
- Gisolfi CV, 2000, News Physiol Sci, 15, 114
- Abbas A, 2014, J Gastroenterol Hepatol Res, 3, 1103
- Feldman M, 1982, J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol, 53, 851
- Brock-Utne JG, 1988, S Afr Med J, 73, 533
- Ma N, 2017, Curr Protein Pept Sci, 18, 795
- Negro M, 2008, J Sports Med Phys Fitness, 48, 347
- Moreno-Perez D, 2018, Double-Blind Pilot Study Nutrients, 10, 337
- Moreno-Indias I, 2016, Am J Transl Res, 8, 5672
- Chen W, 2012, PLoS One, 7
Cited by
Sorted by citations
What defines a healthy gut microbiome?
Hul, M. V., Cani, P. D., Petitfils, C., de Vos, W. M., Tilg, H., & El-Omar, E. M. (2024) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2024-333378 · Cited by 448
“15 However, although low diversity might be indicative of poorer health, high diversity does not necessarily equate to better health.”
BackgroundWegierska, A. E., Charitos, I. A., Topi, S., Potenza, M. A., Montagnani, M., & Santacroce, L. (2022) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.1007/s40279-022-01696-x · Cited by 250
“These microbiota changes favor species with more efficient metabolic activities, and the corresponding increase in butyrate levels persisted over the 3 months of follow-up [98].”
BackgroundMicrobiota’s role in health and diseases
El-Sayed, A., Aleya, L., & Kamel, M. S. (2021) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-021-14593-z · Cited by 212
“…was also found to be influenced by the geographic location due to the differences in environmental (e.g., environmental temperature and water resources) and cultural factors (e.g., type and availability of diet, sport, lifestyle, and stress) (Redondo-Useros et al. 2020; Mohr et al. 2020).”
BackgroundHughes, R., & Holscher, H. D. (2021) · Advances in Nutrition · doi:10.1093/advances/nmab077 · Cited by 212
“Recent reviews have discussed dietary intake (2, 15) and supplements (17) on the gut microbiota of athletes.”
BackgroundDiet and exercise in NAFLD/NASH: Beyond the obvious
Semmler, G., Datz, C., Reiberger, T., & Trauner, M. (2021) · Liver International · doi:10.1111/liv.15024 · Cited by 187
Metadata
- Authors
- Mohr, A. E., Jäger, R., Carpenter, K. C., Kerksick, C. M., Purpura, M., Townsend, J. R., West, N. P., Black, K., Gleeson, M., Pyne, D. B., Wells, S. D., Arent, S. M., Kreider, R. B., Campbell, B. I., Bannock, L., Scheiman, J., Wissent, C. J., Pane, M., Kalman, D. S., Pugh, J. N., Ortega-Santos, C. P., ter Haar, J. A., Arciero, P. J., & Antonio, J.
- Affiliations
- Arizona State University (US)
- Increnovo LLC (United States) (US)
- Lindenwood University (US)
- Lipscomb University (US)
- Griffith University (AU)
- Loughborough University (GB)
- University of Canberra (AU)
- University of South Carolina (US)
- Texas A&M University (US)
- University of South Florida (US)
- Nutrasource (CA)
- Liverpool John Moores University (GB)
- College of Health SolutionsArizona State University Phoenix AZ USA
- International Probiotic Association Los Angeles CA USA
- Skidmore College (US)
- Exercise and Sport ScienceNova Southeastern University Davie FL USA
- Corresponding author
- Mohr, Alex E.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2020-01-03
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 24-24
- ISSN
- 1550-2783 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7218537
- OpenAlex
- W3025067031
- Semantic Scholar
- d5aebbded1fca1f19634f1e5eb972c85483bb76b
- Cited by
- 378
- References
- 247
- Citations by year
- 2026: 55 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 73 · 2023: 62 · 2022: 77 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 7
- FWCI
- 4.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Liverpool John Moores University (acceptedVersion)
- Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Rutgers University Community Repository (Rutgers University) (submittedVersion)
- Scholar Commons (University of South Carolina) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
- Keywords
- gut microbiota, athletes, physical activity, athletic performance, microbial diversity, mucosal immunity, gastrointestinal barrier function, energy metabolism, microbial metabolites, elite athletes
- MeSH terms
- Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Diet, Humans, Exercise, Athletic Performance, Sports Nutritional Physiological Phenomena
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-08, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-08 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review