Cited by 389Gut microbiota and healthProbiotics and Fermented FoodsGastrointestinal motility and disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 245 of the 247 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 15 of the 366 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

The athletic gut microbiota

Open access

Abstract

The microorganisms in the gastrointestinal tract play a significant role in nutrient uptake, vitamin synthesis, energy harvest, inflammatory modulation, and host immune response, collectively contributing to human health. Important factors such as age, birth method, antibiotic use, and diet have been established as formative factors that shape the gut microbiota. Yet, less described is the role that exercise plays, particularly how associated factors and stressors, such as sport/exercise-specific diet, environment, and their interactions, may influence the gut microbiota. In particular, high-level athletes offer remarkable physiology and metabolism (including muscular strength/power, aerobic capacity, energy expenditure, and heat production) compared to sedentary individuals, and provide unique insight in gut microbiota research. In addition, the gut microbiota with its ability to harvest energy, modulate the immune system, and influence gastrointestinal health, likely plays an important role in athlete health, wellbeing, and sports performance. Therefore, understanding the mechanisms in which the gut microbiota could play in the role of influencing athletic performance is of considerable interest to athletes who work to improve their results in competition as well as reduce recovery time during training. Ultimately this research is expected to extend beyond athletics as understanding optimal fitness has applications for overall health and wellness in larger communities. Therefore, the purpose of this narrative review is to summarize current knowledge of the athletic gut microbiota and the factors that shape it. Exercise, associated dietary factors, and the athletic classification promote a more "health-associated" gut microbiota. Such features include a higher abundance of health-promoting bacterial species, increased microbial diversity, functional metabolic capacity, and microbial-associated metabolites, stimulation of bacterial abundance that can modulate mucosal immunity, and improved gastrointestinal barrier function.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This narrative review summarizes evidence that exercise, athletic diet, and athlete classification are associated with a more “health-associated” gut microbiota, including greater diversity, health-promoting taxa, short-chain fatty acids, and functional metabolic pathways. It also emphasizes that causality and long-term effects remain unclear because most evidence is cross-sectional, methodologically heterogeneous, and confounded by diet.

Key findings

  • Athletes generally show higher gut microbiota diversity and health-associated taxa than controls. In professional rugby players (n = 40) vs matched controls (n = 46), athletes had higher diversity representing 22 distinct phyla; *Akkermansia* was higher in athletes and low-BMI controls than high-BMI controls. In female cohorts, athletes had the highest alpha diversity, while anorexia nervosa and obese participants had lower richness.
  • Exercise and fitness correlate with microbial diversity and short-chain fatty acids. VO2peak explained ~20% of variation in gut bacterial alpha diversity in one study and ~22% of variance in the Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio in another; athletes had enriched fecal SCFAs (acetate, propionate, butyrate) and higher TMAO. In cyclists, *Prevotella* was higher in those training > 11 h/week; *Akkermansia* was present in 30/33 cyclists, with 7 having relative abundances > 2%.
  • Acute and chronic exercise can shift specific taxa and metabolites. Post-marathon *Veillonella* increased; *Veillonella atypica* inoculation improved mouse time to exhaustion by 13%. In prediabetic men, exercise responders had −42.70% fasting insulin and −49.60% HOMA-IR, with ~30% responding poorly; baseline microbiome predicted response. Ultra-endurance rowing increased alpha diversity by day 17 and persisted at 3 months.
  • Diet interacts strongly: protein intake correlated positively with diversity in rugby athletes but negatively with Shannon diversity in distance runners (R = −0.63, P = 0.01); fat intake negatively correlated with *Bifidobacteria* in bodybuilders (R = −0.52, P = 0.05). High-protein supplementation increased Bacteroidetes and decreased *Roseburia*, *Blautia*, and *B. longum*; ketogenic LCHF increased *Bacteroides*/*Dorea* and decreased *Faecalibacterium*.

Methods

  • Narrative review summarizing current knowledge of the athletic gut microbiota and the factors that shape it; not a systematic review or meta-analysis.
  • Synthesizes animal and human studies, including cross-sectional comparisons, longitudinal exercise interventions, randomized controlled trials, and metabolomic/metagenomic studies; Tables 1 and 2 list included article characteristics.
  • Main analysis is narrative synthesis of compositional and functional microbiome findings, with attention to exercise, diet, and athlete classification.

Limitations

  • Stated: current evidence is limited; much research is cross-sectional and has relied on 16S rRNA sequencing; methodological variation across studies makes comparisons difficult; many studies may be underpowered and fail to control for confounders such as diet, sex, ethnicity, GI problems, and antibiotics; deep discussion of each study’s methods was not possible.
  • Stated: exercise and diet are difficult to separate, and athletes’ distinct diets may confound exercise-specific effects.
  • Evident: as a narrative review, it does not report a systematic search strategy, risk-of-bias assessment, or quantitative pooling; included studies are heterogeneous and often small, limiting causal inference.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12970-020-00353-w

Cites

245 of 245 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

278 Not checked yet · 69 Own interpretation · 30 No basis given · 6 Partly supported · 2 Supported · 1 Own method · accuracy not yet measured

Verify all 351 references — free account
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 131
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 71
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
183 of 183
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    High-level athletes possess remarkable physiological and metabolic adaptations compared to sedentary individuals.

    “High-level athletes possess remarkable physiological and metabolic adaptations (including muscular strength/power, aerobic capacity, energy expenditure, and heat production) and provide unique insight in gut microbiome research.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Many gut microbiota studies may be underpowered and may not control for important confounding variables such as diet, gender, ethnicity, GI problems, and antibiotics.

    “Furthermore, many gut microbiota studies may be underpowered, and scientists may not be controlling for important confounding variables such as diet, gender, ethnicity, GI problems, antibiotics, etc.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The role of exercise and associated factors and stressors on the gut microbiota has been less well described.

    “The role that exercise plays, in particular the associated factors and stressors, such as sport/exercise-specific diet [11], environment [12], and their interactions, on the gut microbiota have been less well described.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Athletes exemplify exercise, dietary, and athletic factors on a generally consistent and long-term basis.

    “Athletes, although diverse as a population given the wide variety of different types of exercise/fitness/athletic training, competition, dietary practices and attributes, exemplify these factors on a generally consistent and long-term basis.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Findings from animal models (mice, piglets) can be extrapolated to humans, including athletes.

    “These preclinical models indicate a causal, microbiota-dependent relationship between nutrition and growth promotion which may have implications for younger athletes.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The gut microbiota composition measured in feces reflects the gut microbiota throughout the GI tract.

    “feces is the only sample material used in the analyses of the gut microbiota from the studies included in this review.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Dietary protein effects on gut microbiota observed in non-athletes apply to athletes.

    “It seems that high-protein diets may have a negative impact on gut microbiota diversity for athletes in endurance sports who consume lower amounts of energy, carbohydrates, and dietary fiber, while athletes in resistance sports that follow a high-protein, low-carbohydrate, and high-fat diet demonstrate a decrease in SCFA-producing commensal bacteria.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The studies reviewed are sufficiently comparable to draw general conclusions about diet and gut microbiota.

    “The variation in microbial analysis across different studies can make comparing/contrasting study findings difficult.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    LPS can be incorporated into lipid micelles formed during fat digestion.

    “LPS can be incorporated into lipid micelles formed during fat digestion”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Certain gut microbes may be important in regulating the incorporation of LPS into lipid micelles.

    “and certain gut microbes may be important in regulating this process.”
10 of 10

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

3 of 3

Citations

Cites

Show all 247 references

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. Dudek-Wicher RK, 2018, Prz Gastroenterol, 13, 85
  2. Bermon S, 2015, Exerc Immunol Rev, 21, 70
  3. Barton W, 2018, Gut., 67, 625
  4. O'Sullivan A, 2015, Nutr Metab Insights, 8, 1
  5. Ishiguro E, 2018, Gut microbiota: interactive effects of nutrition and health: Elsevier
  6. Rodriguez JM, 2015, Microb Ecol Health Dis, 26, 26050
  7. Barb JJ, 2016, PLoS One, 11
  8. Liu Z, 2008, Nucleic Acids Res, 36
  9. Khan MJ, 2016, J Obes, 2016, 7353642
  10. Evans CC, 2014, PLoS One, 9
  11. Larsen N, 2010, PLoS One, 5
  12. Queipo-Ortuno MI, 2013, PLoS One, 8
  13. Clavel T, 2014, The prokaryotes
  14. Taniguchi H, 2018, Phys Rep, 6
  15. Gisolfi CV, 2000, News Physiol Sci, 15, 114
  16. Abbas A, 2014, J Gastroenterol Hepatol Res, 3, 1103
  17. Feldman M, 1982, J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol, 53, 851
  18. Brock-Utne JG, 1988, S Afr Med J, 73, 533
  19. Ma N, 2017, Curr Protein Pept Sci, 18, 795
  20. Negro M, 2008, J Sports Med Phys Fitness, 48, 347
  21. Moreno-Perez D, 2018, Double-Blind Pilot Study Nutrients, 10, 337
  22. Moreno-Indias I, 2016, Am J Transl Res, 8, 5672
  23. Chen W, 2012, PLoS One, 7

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 389

Metadata

Authors
Mohr, A. E., Jäger, R., Carpenter, K. C., Kerksick, C. M., Purpura, M., Townsend, J. R., West, N. P., Black, K., Gleeson, M., Pyne, D. B., Wells, S. D., Arent, S. M., Kreider, R. B., Campbell, B. I., Bannock, L., Scheiman, J., Wissent, C. J., Pane, M., Kalman, D. S., Pugh, J. N., Ortega-Santos, C. P., ter Haar, J. A., Arciero, P. J., & Antonio, J.
Affiliations
  • Arizona State University (US)
  • Increnovo LLC (United States) (US)
  • Lindenwood University (US)
  • Lipscomb University (US)
  • Griffith University (AU)
  • Loughborough University (GB)
  • University of Canberra (AU)
  • University of South Carolina (US)
  • Texas A&M University (US)
  • University of South Florida (US)
  • Nutrasource (CA)
  • Liverpool John Moores University (GB)
  • College of Health SolutionsArizona State University Phoenix AZ USA
  • International Probiotic Association Los Angeles CA USA
  • Skidmore College (US)
  • Exercise and Sport ScienceNova Southeastern University Davie FL USA
Corresponding author
Mohr, Alex E.
Venue
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
Published
2020-01-03
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
24-24
ISSN
1550-2783 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3025067031
Cited by
378
References
247
Citations by year
2026: 55 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 73 · 2023: 62 · 2022: 77 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 7
FWCI
4.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Liverpool John Moores University (acceptedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Rutgers University Community Repository (Rutgers University) (submittedVersion)
  • Scholar Commons (University of South Carolina) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
Keywords
gut microbiota, athletes, physical activity, athletic performance, microbial diversity, mucosal immunity, gastrointestinal barrier function, energy metabolism, microbial metabolites, elite athletes
MeSH terms
Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Diet, Humans, Exercise, Athletic Performance, Sports Nutritional Physiological Phenomena

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-08, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-08 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review