The DOI matches its Crossref record; 148 of the 149 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 198 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis
Open accessAbstract
Endometriosis is histologically characterized by the displacement of endometrial tissue to extrauterine locations including the pelvic peritoneum, ovaries, and bowel. An important cause of infertility and pelvic pain, the individual and global socioeconomic burden of endometriosis is significant. Laparoscopy remains the gold standard for the diagnosis of the condition. However, the invasive nature of surgery, coupled with the lack of a laboratory biomarker for the disease, results in a mean latency of 7–11 years from onset of symptoms to definitive diagnosis. Unfortunately, the delay in diagnosis may have significant consequences in terms of disease progression. The discovery of a sufficiently sensitive and specific biomarker for the nonsurgical detection of endometriosis promises earlier diagnosis and prevention of deleterious sequelae and represents a clear research priority. In this review, we describe and discuss the current status of biomarkers of endometriosis in plasma, urine, and endometrium.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This narrative review concludes that no single biomarker or panel has been validated for noninvasive detection of endometriosis, and laparoscopy remains the diagnostic gold standard. It surveys blood, urine, and endometrial candidates, highlighting promising but largely unvalidated panels and the need for Phase II/III validation.
Key findings
- Laparoscopy remains the gold standard, contributing to a mean latency of 7–11 years from symptom onset to definitive diagnosis; no blood biomarker or panel has been validated for clinical use.
- CA-125 meta-analysis showed 50% sensitivity and 72% specificity for stage I–IV endometriosis, and 60% sensitivity with 80% specificity for stage III–IV disease; CA-125 is not specific because it is also elevated in ovarian cancer.
- Several candidate panels report high accuracy but remain unvalidated, e.g. CA-125 + CA-19-9 + survivin mRNA had 87% sensitivity and a 10% false-positive rate; CA-125 + CCR1 mRNA + MCP-1 had 92.2% sensitivity and 81.6% specificity; a 4-marker panel (CA-125, VEGF, Annexin V, glycodelin/sICAM-1) showed 74–94% sensitivity and 55–75% specificity after initial validation.
- Endometrial nerve fiber detection by PGP9.5 showed 98% sensitivity and 83% specificity in a double-blind pipelle study, but a clinical laboratory adoption detected nerve fibers in 9/45 (22%) histologically confirmed endometriosis cases and 6/21 (29%) women without endometriosis, raising specificity concerns.
Methods
- Narrative review of the current status of endometriosis biomarkers in plasma, urine, and endometrium, framed by the four phases of biomarker development (Phase I preclinical discovery through Phase IV commercialization).
- Synthesizes published studies and reported diagnostic performance metrics; no new primary data, systematic search strategy, or meta-analysis is described.
- Main analysis is qualitative synthesis of candidate biomarkers, including glycoproteins, cytokines, oxidative stress markers, cell adhesion/invasion factors, angiogenesis markers, hormones, autoantibodies, miRNAs, proteomics, metabolomics, cell-free DNA, cell populations, urine markers, and endometrial markers.
Limitations
- Stated in the paper: most endometriosis biomarker studies remain at Phase I, only a few reach Phase II, and Phase III/IV has not been reached; no noninvasive test is commercially available or validated.
- Stated in the paper: common limitations include small sample size, suboptimal specimen characterization (e.g., no breakdown by menstrual phase or lesion phenotype), inconsistent sample handling/storage, and lack of reproducibility; proteomic technologies are costly, time-consuming, and need better standardization.
- Evident from the text: as a narrative review, it does not use a systematic search or formal quality appraisal, and it relies on heterogeneous studies with differing assays, sample types, cycle phases, and populations, which limits comparability of reported sensitivities and specificities.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
0 of 198 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
In the paper
“CA-125 combined with interleukin-8 (IL-8) and tumor necrosis factors-α (TNF-α) in the secretory phase had a sensitivity of 89.7% and specificity of 71.1% in a study performed by Mihalyi and coworkers [36].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 3. Blood Biomarkers > 3.1. Glycoproteins
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [36] source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“In addition to this lack of specificity, the sensitivity to detect all endometriosis stages is low [31].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 3. Blood Biomarkers > 3.1. Glycoproteins
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [31] source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Product development by industry, which has not yet been done successfully for noninvasive endometriosis biomarkers.”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 2. Diagnostic Test for Endometriosis
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Unfortunately, the delay in diagnosis may have significant consequences in terms of disease progression.”
- Also stated in: § 1. Background · boosted
“Delayed diagnosis and treatment has significant consequences, as endometriosis is more advanced in women whose diagnostic laparoscopy is delayed, supporting progression of disease over time [13].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [13] source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Also stated in: § 1. Background · boosted
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Despite extensive research, no single biomarker nor a panel of biomarkers in peripheral blood has been validated as a diagnostic test for endometriosis [17, 20].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 3. Blood Biomarkers
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“A panel of CA-125, chemokine receptor (CCR) type-1 mRNA, and monocyte chemoattractant protein- (MCP) 1 showed a sensitivity of 92.2% and specificity of 81.6% to detect endometriosis [40].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 3. Blood Biomarkers > 3.1. Glycoproteins
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [40] source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“A clinically reliable test for endometriosis can be expected to have a profound impact on reduction of health care and individual costs by [18]reducing time to diagnosis and the time wasted to see numerous health care professionals;subsequently reducing the time before individualized specialist care is invoked;subsequently reducing expensive hit-and-miss treatments;subsequently reducing expensive”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 2. Diagnostic Test for Endometriosis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [18] 2014
- Not checked yetcites [25] 2008
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“longitudinal placebo-controlled trials with second look laparoscopy have demonstrated that 71–83% of untreated lesions will progress or remain stable over a 12-month period [14].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 1. Background
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [14] 1994, Fertility and Sterility source
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, all these results remain to be validated.”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 3. Blood Biomarkers > 3.1. Glycoproteins
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“According to a meta-analysis by Mol et al., the sensitivity for stage I–IV endometriosis was 50% and specificity was 72%.”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 3. Blood Biomarkers > 3.1. Glycoproteins
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [31] source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Putative endometriosis biomarkers are mostly glycoproteins, growth or adhesion factors, hormones, or proteins related to immunology or angiogenesis [17, 23, 30].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 3. Blood Biomarkers
What the sources say
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“For stage III-IV endometriosis, a sensitivity of 60% could be obtained with a specificity of 80% [31].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 3. Blood Biomarkers > 3.1. Glycoproteins
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [31] source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“the development of such a test, from initial biomarker discovery to a clinically approved biomarker assay is a long, difficult, and uncertain process [22]”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 2. Diagnostic Test for Endometriosis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [22] source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Laparoscopy remains the gold standard for the diagnosis of the condition.”
- Also stated in: § 1. Background · plain
“the gold standard for the diagnosis of endometriosis remains direct visualization of lesions at surgery preferably coupled with histologic confirmation of endometrial glands and stroma in biopsies of suspected lesions”
- Also stated in: § 2. Diagnostic Test for Endometriosis · plain
“The gold standard for the diagnosis of peritoneal endometriosis has been visual inspection by laparoscopy followed by histological confirmation [7].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [7] source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Also stated in: § 1. Background · plain
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“the invasive nature of surgery, coupled with the lack of a laboratory biomarker for the disease, results in a mean latency of 7–11 years from onset of symptoms to definitive diagnosis.”
- Also stated in: § 1. Background · boosted
“The requirement for invasive surgery for the diagnosis of peritoneal implants strongly contributes to an average latency of 7–11 years from onset of symptoms to definitive diagnosis [3, 11].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Also stated in: § 1. Background · boosted
In the paper
“The combination of CA-125, CA-19-9, and survivin mRNA showed promise, boasting a sensitivity of 87% and a 10% false positive rate [33].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 3. Blood Biomarkers > 3.1. Glycoproteins
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [33] source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This phase establishes the diagnostic accuracy and predictive value in the target population, but this phase has not yet been reached in endometriosis biomarker research.”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 2. Diagnostic Test for Endometriosis
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“At present, such a test does not exist [17, 20].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 2. Diagnostic Test for Endometriosis
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“In a study by de Sanctis et al., mRNA levels of MMP-3 were significantly higher in stage II–IV endometriosis cases than in controls [66].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 3. Blood Biomarkers > 3.4. Cell Adhesion and Invasion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [66] source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Significantly increased IL-4 serum values have been found in adolescents with endometriosis [52].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 3. Blood Biomarkers > 3.2. Immunological Markers and Inflammatory Cytokines
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [52] source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“A study by Mihalyi et al. found a panel consisting of luteal plasma levels of IL-8, TNF-α, and CA-125 that was able to distinguish between 201 women with endometriosis and 93 controls with a normal pelvis with a sensitivity of 89.7% and a specificity of 71.1% [36].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 3. Blood Biomarkers > 3.2. Immunological Markers and Inflammatory Cytokines
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [36] source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“For CA-19-9 a significant positive correlation with disease severity was found [42].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 3. Blood Biomarkers > 3.1. Glycoproteins
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [42] source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Recently, a panel of 4 biomarkers (CA-125, VEGF, Annexin V, and glycodelin/soluble intercellular adhesion molecule (sICAM)-1) showed a sensitivity of 74–94% and a specificity of 55–75% in a training set and after initial validation in an independent test set [24].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 3. Blood Biomarkers > 3.1. Glycoproteins
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [24] source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Levels of the sICAM-I have been suggested to rise during early stages of endometriosis (I-II) and decrease at stage III-IV [23].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 3. Blood Biomarkers > 3.4. Cell Adhesion and Invasion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [23] source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The inflammatory marker C-reactive protein (CRP) has been shown to be upregulated [23], especially when examined with a high sensitivity assay making it possible to detect subclinical inflammation in women with endometriosis [50].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 3. Blood Biomarkers > 3.2. Immunological Markers and Inflammatory Cytokines
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“However, a follow-up study could not reproduce these results [44].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 3. Blood Biomarkers > 3.1. Glycoproteins
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [44] source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“MMP-2 [63] and MMP-9 [64] have been found to be significantly increased in endometriosis patients versus controls.”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 3. Blood Biomarkers > 3.4. Cell Adhesion and Invasion
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“The same study showed similar levels of MMP-9 and vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A) mRNA among cases and controls [66].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 3. Blood Biomarkers > 3.4. Cell Adhesion and Invasion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [66] source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Glycodelin A, a promoter of neovascularization and cell proliferation, was examined in follicular phase serum of adolescent girls with endometriosis (n = 33) aged 13–19 alongside TNF-α and IL-6, but none of these proteins showed a different expression compared with adolescents without endometriosis (n = 17) [46].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 3. Blood Biomarkers > 3.1. Glycoproteins
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [46] source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 33Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Values of T-helper pathway related interleukins IL-10, IL-12, IL-17, and IL-23 levels were comparable between infertile controls and endometriosis patients with infertility [49].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 3. Blood Biomarkers > 3.2. Immunological Markers and Inflammatory Cytokines
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [49] source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“ROC curve analysis showed that the area under the curve was the highest for CA-125 (0.938) [42].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 3. Blood Biomarkers > 3.1. Glycoproteins
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [42] source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Follow-up of patients with advanced endometriosis showed reduced VEGF-A levels after laparoscopic excision of the lesions [68, 69].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 3. Blood Biomarkers > 3.5. Angiogenesis
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Women with endometriosis might experience increased oxidative stress in the pelvic cavity due to the retrograde flow of menstrual erythrocytes that release iron upon rupture [55].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 3. Blood Biomarkers > 3.3. Oxidative Stress
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [55] source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Correspondingly, sICAM-I has been included in a panel with three other markers to diagnose endometriosis cases that could not be identified by preoperative ultrasound [24].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 3. Blood Biomarkers > 3.4. Cell Adhesion and Invasion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [24] source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Its usefulness as biomarker for endometriosis is unclear, as some studies show elevated blood levels in endometriosis patients while other studies do not record a significant difference [23, 67].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 3. Blood Biomarkers > 3.5. Angiogenesis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [23] source
- Not checked yetcites [67] 2013, International Journal of Fertility and Sterility
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“In a study by Panoulis et al., no difference in the serum expression of the inflammatory markers CD40, CD40L and a disintegrin and metalloproteinase domain 8 (ADAM8) was detected between endometriosis patients (n = 47) and controls (n = 29) [48].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 3. Blood Biomarkers > 3.2. Immunological Markers and Inflammatory Cytokines
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [48] 2011, Minerva Ginecologica
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 47Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In addition, the cell adhesion molecule osteopontin was elevated in plasma for all disease stages [60, 61].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 3. Blood Biomarkers > 3.4. Cell Adhesion and Invasion
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Moreover, advanced endometriosis is correlated with a higher MMP-2 expression [65].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 3. Blood Biomarkers > 3.4. Cell Adhesion and Invasion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [65] source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“However, no consensus exists on whether cytokines are suitable to discriminate endometriosis patients from patients with other pelvic pathology [24].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 3. Blood Biomarkers > 3.2. Immunological Markers and Inflammatory Cytokines
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [24] source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“At a cut-off value of 251.18 pg/mL, its sensitivity to predict endometriosis was 65% and the specificity was 58.3% [42].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 3. Blood Biomarkers > 3.2. Immunological Markers and Inflammatory Cytokines
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [42] source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“However, other studies could not find an upregulation [23, 51].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 3. Blood Biomarkers > 3.2. Immunological Markers and Inflammatory Cytokines
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“In a study comprising patients with ovarian endometriosis (n = 40), eight metabolites and 81 metabolite ratios were significantly higher in the endometriosis group compared with healthy controls undergoing laparoscopy for sterilization (n = 52) [93].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 3. Blood Biomarkers > 3.10. Metabolomics
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [93] source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“A study comprising 22 women with minimal/mild endometriosis and 23 controls found higher values of Lactate, 3-Hydroxybutyrate, L-Alanine, Glycerophosphatidylcholine, L-Valine, L-Leucine, L-Threonine, 2-Hydroxybutyrate, L-Lysine, Succinic acid in the endometriosis group and lower values of Glucose, L-Isoleucine, and L-Arginine [94].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 3. Blood Biomarkers > 3.10. Metabolomics
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [94] source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Since 2010, only 11% of reported endometriosis biomarker studies were urine-based [99].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 4. Urine Biomarkers
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [99] source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“No consensus exists on changes in steroid hormone levels [23].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 3. Blood Biomarkers > 3.6. Hormones
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [23] source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Likewise, specific antibodies against carbonic anhydrase, transferrin, α2-HS glycoprotein, lipid peroxide modified rabbit serum albumin, copper oxidized low-density lipoprotein and malondialdehyde-modified low-density lipoprotein, laminin-I, and cardiolipin have shown promise as potential endometriosis biomarkers [23].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 3. Blood Biomarkers > 3.7. Autoantibodies
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [23] source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Autoantibodies against different epitopes of tropomyosin 3 (TPM3), stomatin-like protein 2 (SLP2), and tropomodulin 3 (TMOD3) were significantly elevated in the serum of endometriosis patients with both minimal/mild and moderate/severe disease [80].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 3. Blood Biomarkers > 3.7. Autoantibodies
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [80] source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Despite these contrasting results, a recent study proposing a panel of biomarkers included VEGF in two panels to detect minimal/mild endometriosis with 80% sensitivity [24].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 3. Blood Biomarkers > 3.5. Angiogenesis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [24] source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Other growth factors, such as soluble epidermal growth factor (EGF) and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) have been investigated, but no difference was found between endometriosis patients and control women [23].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 3. Blood Biomarkers > 3.5. Angiogenesis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [23] source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“In another study, danazol treatment of endometriosis patients resulted in an increased VEGF concentration in plasma [70].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 3. Blood Biomarkers > 3.5. Angiogenesis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [70] source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“leading to the conclusion that circulating cell-free DNA may be a potential biomarker for endometriosis [95].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 3. Blood Biomarkers > 3.11. Circulating Cell-Free DNA
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [95] source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Stearic acid was significantly reduced (P = 0.030) in endometriosis patients (n = 64) compared with controls (n = 74) [92].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 3. Blood Biomarkers > 3.10. Metabolomics
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [92] source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Furthermore, this combination of peptide peaks was validated in an independent cohort, showing a sensitivity of 89.3% and a specificity of 90% [90].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 3. Blood Biomarkers > 3.9. Proteomics
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [90] source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“In a study by Zachariah et al., the concentration of circulating cell-free nuclear DNA was higher in endometriosis patients compared with the control group (P = 0.046), leading to the conclusion that circulating cell-free DNA may be a potential biomarker for endometriosis [95].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 3. Blood Biomarkers > 3.11. Circulating Cell-Free DNA
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [95] source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“A proteomic fingerprint model, based on three peptide peaks, had 91.4% sensitivity and 95% specificity to detect endometriosis when comparing 126 patients with endometriosis with 120 healthy controls [90].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 3. Blood Biomarkers > 3.9. Proteomics
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [90] source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Recently, a CD25high forkhead box 3+ (FOXP3+) subset of CD4+ regulatory T cells has been shown to be decreased in peripheral blood of women with endometrioma (n = 17) compared with healthy controls (n = 15) [97].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 3. Blood Biomarkers > 3.12. Cell Populations
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [97] source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“A range of cell populations, including T cells, B cells, natural killer (NK) cells, macrophages/monocytes, and polymorphonuclear neutrophils, has been compared between endometriosis patients and healthy controls [23]. However, for none of these populations the utility as an endometriosis biomarker has been proven [23, 96].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 3. Blood Biomarkers > 3.12. Cell Populations
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“The serum concentration of its receptor, c-Met, was significantly higher in endometriosis patients (n = 130) than in controls (n = 39), in a stage dependent manner [74].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 3. Blood Biomarkers > 3.5. Angiogenesis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [74] source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“The combination of hydroxysphingomyelin C16:1 and the ratio between phosphatidylcholine C36:2 to ether-phospholipid C34:2, adjusted for the effect of age and BMI, provided a sensitivity of 90.0% and a specificity of 84.3% for the detection of endometriosis [93].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 3. Blood Biomarkers > 3.10. Metabolomics
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [93] source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“A combination of 5 peptide peaks, discovered by surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight (SELDI-TOF) mass spectrometry, detected endometriosis with a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 84% in the menstrual phase [91].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 3. Blood Biomarkers > 3.9. Proteomics
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [91] 2012, Obstetrics & Gynecology source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“In patients with ovarian endometrioma, autoantibodies against Insulin-like growth factor 2 mRNA-binding protein 1 (IMP1) were significantly higher than in healthy controls [79].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 3. Blood Biomarkers > 3.7. Autoantibodies
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [79] source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“A study evaluating serum miRNA levels, found an elevation of miR-199a and miR-122 and a decrease of miR-145*, miR-141*, miR-542-3p, and miR-9* in endometriosis patients compared with controls [88].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 3. Blood Biomarkers > 3.8. miRNA
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [88] source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Using an immunoblot technique, Tokushige et al. demonstrated cytokeratin-19 (CK19) to be uniquely expressed in 11 urine samples from women with histologically proven endometriosis relative to samples from 6 women free of disease [102].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 4. Urine Biomarkers
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [102] source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Similar to peritoneal disease, ovarian endometriosis evidenced differential expression of miRNAs relative to paired eutopic endometrium in several studies [122, 123].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 5. Endometrial Biomarkers > 5.2. MicroRNAs
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“and this basal cyclic variation in the endometrium must be accounted for in the interpretation of endometrial gene and protein expression signatures.”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 5. Endometrial Biomarkers
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“A panel consisting of MMP-2, MMP-9, and MMP-9/neutrophil gealtinase-associated lipocalin was significantly elevated in a cohort of 33 women with endometriosis relative to expression in a group of 13 controls [104].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 4. Urine Biomarkers
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [104] source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Creatinine-corrected soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase (sFlt-1) was found to be significantly elevated in the urine of women with endometriosis using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) [101].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 4. Urine Biomarkers
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [101] source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“El-Kasti et al. identified a 3280.9 Da periovulatory peptide that differentiated all stages of endometriosis from controls with 82% senstitivity and 88% specificity.”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 4. Urine Biomarkers
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“For example, the two best performing proliferative and early-secretory phase-specific disease classifiers achieved 100% accuracy using less than 100 genes for each disease classification decision.”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 5. Endometrial Biomarkers > 5.1. Endometrial Transcriptome
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [118] source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The endometrial transcriptome in women with endometriosis may have shared patterns of dysregulation with other inflammatory conditions such as hydrosalpinx [110] or other estrogen dependent diseases such as leiomyomata, endometrial polyps, or adenomyosis [111, 112].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 5. Endometrial Biomarkers
What the sources say
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“At the transcript level, significant differences in gene expression exist in eutopic endometrium from women with versus without endometriosis [114–117].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 5. Endometrial Biomarkers > 5.1. Endometrial Transcriptome
What the sources say
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Both array-based global and targeted gene expression studies [113] have identified genes and pathways that may be involved in disease pathogenesis and reveal potential candidates for the development of an endometrial-based biomarker.”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 5. Endometrial Biomarkers > 5.1. Endometrial Transcriptome
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [113] source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In addition to menstrual cycle phase, gynecologic conditions other than endometriosis have been shown to influence eutopic endometrial gene and protein expression.”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 5. Endometrial Biomarkers
What the sources say
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Despite elevation in women with endometriosis, enolase-1 lacked sufficient diagnostic power as an individual analyte (sensitivity 56% and specificity 72%) in a separate study [108].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 4. Urine Biomarkers
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [108] source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Using matrix assisted laser desorption/ionisation time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS), several groups have reported differential peptide profiles in the urine of women with endometriosis relative to that of women without endometriosis at surgery [102, 106].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 4. Urine Biomarkers
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Whole genome profiling of normal endometrium revealed tremendous molecular variation between samples taken from the proliferative, early-secretory, midsecretory, and late-secretory phases of the menstrual cycle [109]”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 5. Endometrial Biomarkers
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [109] source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“As individual analytes, these proteins evidenced insufficient sensitivity and specificity for use as a biomarker.”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 4. Urine Biomarkers
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [107] source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Clustered pathologies may confound the interpretation of molecular measurements in the delineation of a biomarker unique to endometriosis.”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 5. Endometrial Biomarkers
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Using arrays probing 377 miRNAs to compare eutopic and ectopic (peritoneal) endometrium from seven women with stage II–IV endometriosis, Teague et al., detected dysregulation of 22 miRNAs, with predicted cognate mRNA targets known to be involved in endometriosis pathogenesis [121].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 5. Endometrial Biomarkers > 5.2. MicroRNAs
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [121] source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Like the endometrial transcriptome generally, microRNA expression in normal endometrium exhibits dynamic changes across the menstrual cycle.”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 5. Endometrial Biomarkers > 5.2. MicroRNAs
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [119] source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Tokushige et al. coupled MALDI-TOF with two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (2D-PAGE) to reveal 12-fold higher expression of five proteins in affected women.”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 4. Urine Biomarkers
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“A larger prospective study was subsequently unable to confirm the diagnostic potential for urinary CK19 [103], possibly due to different specimen collection techniques or different subject characteristics.”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 4. Urine Biomarkers
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [103] source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Cho et al. used 2D-PAGE and tandem MS to identify significantly higher levels of 22 urine proteins in women with endometriosis including vitamin D-binding protein, prealbumin, enolase-1, and alpha1-antitrypsin [107].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 4. Urine Biomarkers
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [107] source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Global differential expression of miRNAs in eutopic compared with ectopic endometrium has been evaluated by several groups [120–124].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 5. Endometrial Biomarkers > 5.2. MicroRNAs
What the sources say
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Pan et al. identified differential expression of 48 miRNAs in a microarray analysis of early to mid-secretory eutopic endometrial tissues from endometriosis-free volunteers (n = 4), and from eutopic (n = 4) and ectopic (n = 8) endometrial tissues from women with endometriosis.”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 5. Endometrial Biomarkers > 5.2. MicroRNAs
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Interestingly, relatively few genes were required to delineate endometriosis from other benign pelvic conditions and to classify disease severity.”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 5. Endometrial Biomarkers > 5.1. Endometrial Transcriptome
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [118] source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These highly informative gene sets provide a finite panel for biomarker development purposes.”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 5. Endometrial Biomarkers > 5.1. Endometrial Transcriptome
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Analysis of pooled urine from healthy men and women revealed that 70% of the urine proteins originate directly from the urinary system and the remaining 30% represent proteins from other organ systems filtered by the kidney [100].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 4. Urine Biomarkers
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [100] source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“A comparison of miRNA array based profiles of human primary epithelial cells isolated from estrogen-dominant late proliferative (n = 4) and progesterone-dominant mid secretory (n = 4) phase endometrial specimens identified 24 differentially expressed miRNAs [119].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 5. Endometrial Biomarkers > 5.2. MicroRNAs
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [119] source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“To date, none of the differentially expressed peptide peaks have been validated in an independent study cohort to which investigators are blinded as to patients' disease status.”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 5. Endometrial Biomarkers > 5.3. Endometrial Proteome
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Wang et al. performed proteomic profiling of endometrium from 13 women with and 13 women without endometriosis identifying five differentially expressed peptide peaks (5.385 m/z, 5.425 m/z, 5.891 m/z, 6.448 m/z, and 6.898 m/z) that collectively showed 91.7% sensitivity and 90% specificity in the diagnosis of endometriosis [132].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 5. Endometrial Biomarkers > 5.3. Endometrial Proteome
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [132] source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Though strengthened by the stringency of including only surgically documented presence or absence of advanced stage endometriosis, the study is limited by inclusion of control endometrium from women with coexisting intramural leiomyomata which could confound delineation of endometriosis-specific miRNA differences.”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 5. Endometrial Biomarkers > 5.2. MicroRNAs
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [125] source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Specifically, menstrual cycle phase of endometrial samples was not specified in several of the studies [132, 135], and only one randomly divided endometrial samples into training and test sets [131].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 5. Endometrial Biomarkers > 5.3. Endometrial Proteome
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In contrast to studies comparing miRNA expression in eutopic versus ectopic endometrium, relatively few studies have compared miRNA expression in eutopic endometrium from women with and without surgically confirmed endometriosis [120, 125, 126].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 5. Endometrial Biomarkers > 5.2. MicroRNAs
What the sources say
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“In the largest study to date involving a total of 53 endometrial samples, a panel of three differentially expressed peptide peaks (16.069 m/z, 15.334 m/z, and 15.128 m/z) diagnosed endometriosis (all rAFS stages) with 87.5% sensitivity and 86.2% specificity [135].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 5. Endometrial Biomarkers > 5.3. Endometrial Proteome
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [135] source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Specifically, menstrual cycle phase of endometrial samples was not specified in several of the studies [132, 135], and only one randomly divided endometrial samples into training and test sets [131].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 5. Endometrial Biomarkers > 5.3. Endometrial Proteome
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [131] source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“In a double blind study of endometrial pipelle samples from 99 consecutive women undergoing laparoscopy for pelvic pain and/or infertility, immunohistochemical detection of PGP9.5 demonstrated 98% sensitivity and 83% specificity for the finding of endometriosis at surgery [140].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 5. Endometrial Biomarkers > 5.4. Neuronal Marker
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [140] source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Immunohistochemical detection of the protein gene product 9.5 (PGP9.5), a highly specific pan-neuronal marker, was described at peritoneal lesions developing from surgically transplanted uterine horn segments in a rat model of endometriosis [138].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 5. Endometrial Biomarkers > 5.4. Neuronal Marker
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [138] source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“In 2006, the first of these reports described reduced expression of a protein peak in secretory phase endometrium from women with mild endometriosis relative to controls [133].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 5. Endometrial Biomarkers > 5.3. Endometrial Proteome
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [133] source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“The overexpression of these miRNAs correlated with the downregulation of HOXA10 in endometrium from women with endometriosis.”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 5. Endometrial Biomarkers > 5.2. MicroRNAs
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [127] source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Nonetheless, the detection of nerve fibers in 29% of women without endometriosis raised concerns regarding the assay's specificity [143].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 5. Endometrial Biomarkers > 5.4. Neuronal Marker
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [143] source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“For example, miR-135a (proliferative phase) and miR-135b (proliferative and secretory phases) were investigated due to their predicted interaction with Homeobox protein (HOX) A10 [127].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 5. Endometrial Biomarkers > 5.2. MicroRNAs
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [127] source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The demonstration of aberrant microRNA expression profiles in the eutopic endometrium from women with endometriosis may yield promising biomarker targets.”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 5. Endometrial Biomarkers > 5.2. MicroRNAs
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“This can allow researchers to overcome the main pitfalls in the study design and methodology such as small sample size, lack of relevant clinical information inconsistency in sample handling and storage, and technical control of preanalytical sample variability, which contribute to controversial study results in endometriosis research [17].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 6. Standard Operating Procedures
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [17] source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Importantly, nerve fibers were not observed in other benign gynecologic conditions to include endometritis, leiomyomata, or endometrial polyps.”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 5. Endometrial Biomarkers > 5.4. Neuronal Marker
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [140] source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“However, the adoption of this method in a clinical laboratory failed to recapitulate the accuracy of endometrial PGP9.5 immunohistochemistry in the diagnosis of women with endometriosis [143].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 5. Endometrial Biomarkers > 5.4. Neuronal Marker
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [143] source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“In a parallel miRNA-mRNA array based comparison of three control early secretory phase endometrium (n = 3) with endometria from four women with moderate-severe endometriosis, six downregulated endometriosis associated miRNA were identified from the miR-9 and miR-34 miRNA families [125].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 5. Endometrial Biomarkers > 5.2. MicroRNAs
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [125] source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“These results were confirmed in a study of 27 prospectively collected eutopic endometrial specimens using identical sampling and detection methods [142].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 5. Endometrial Biomarkers > 5.4. Neuronal Marker
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [142] source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“A larger study identified differential expression of 32 peptide peaks in secretory phase endometrium from 10 women with endometriosis (all rAFS stages) compared to that of 6 healthy women [134].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 5. Endometrial Biomarkers > 5.3. Endometrial Proteome
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [134] source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Several groups have reported unique proteomic profiles using the SELDI-TOF MS platform in eutopic endometrial specimens from women with and without endometriosis [131, 132].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 5. Endometrial Biomarkers > 5.3. Endometrial Proteome
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Though the differentially expressed m/z peaks identified among separate groups showed no overlap, important methodological differences are apparent.”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 5. Endometrial Biomarkers > 5.3. Endometrial Proteome
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Direct regulation of HOXA10 by miR-135a/b was subsequently confirmed by luciferase assay in cultured endometrial stromal cells.”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 5. Endometrial Biomarkers > 5.2. MicroRNAs
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“In a unique concomitant assessment of the endometrial transcriptome and proteome, Fassbender et al. described a panel of differentially expressed peptide peaks (2072 m/z, 2973 m/z, 3623 m/z, 3680 m/z, and 21133 m/z) in the early secretory endometrial proteome of women with versus without endometriosis as diagnostic of endometriosis (all rAFS stages) with 91% sensitivity and 80% specificity [131].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 5. Endometrial Biomarkers > 5.3. Endometrial Proteome
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [131] source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Despite the plethora of studies on endometriosis biomarkers, neither a single biomarker nor a panel of biomarkers has been validated for a noninvasive diagnostic test with sufficient sensitivity and specificity [17].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 7. Conclusion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [17] source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“A first step toward validation of biomarkers has been made [24, 140]; however, further studies are needed to develop a clinically useful test.”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 7. Conclusion
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Currently, biomarker research in endometriosis is still lacking reproducible data with high sensitivity and specificity.”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 7. Conclusion
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition, limitations derive from small sample size and suboptimal characterisation of specimens (no breakdown according to menstrual phase or lesion phenotype).”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 7. Conclusion
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes
- It may state two separate claims as one. 43
- Probably not a substantial claim. 8
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
In the paper
“A recent study showed a significant increase of CA-125 (P = 0.001), CA-19-9 (P = 0.015), and CA-15-3 (P = 0.017) in endometriosis cases (n = 50) versus controls (n = 35) [42].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 3. Blood Biomarkers > 3.1. Glycoproteins
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [42] source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“However, CA-125 is not specific for endometriosis, being a tumor marker elevated in ovarian cancer [37, 38].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 3. Blood Biomarkers > 3.1. Glycoproteins
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Overall, most endometriosis biomarker studies have remained at the level of Phase I [23] and only a few have made it to Phase II studies.”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 2. Diagnostic Test for Endometriosis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [23] source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Although there is consensus in the World Endometriosis Society that the development of a reliable noninvasive test is one of the top research priorities in endometriosis [11, 21]”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 2. Diagnostic Test for Endometriosis
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“endometriosis is more advanced in women whose diagnostic laparoscopy is delayed, supporting progression of disease over time [13].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 1. Background
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [13] source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Since the extensive review of May et al., 2010, research in endometriosis biomarkers has accomplished the successful validation of biomarkers in an independent sample dataset [24], but still no test for endometriosis is commercially available.”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 3. Blood Biomarkers
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [24] source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Blood is an interesting potential source of biomarkers because it allows repeated measurements, is easily obtained, and is highly suitable for high-throughput measurements [29].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 3. Blood Biomarkers
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [29] source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In summary, a non- or semi-invasive test would not only reduce the cost associated with endometriosis but also improve the quality of life of women with endometriosis by allowing early diagnosis.”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 2. Diagnostic Test for Endometriosis
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Ozhan et al. stated that a panel consisting of CA-125, syntaxin-5, and laminin-1 had 90% sensitivity, 70% specificity, and 88.7% accuracy to distinguish endometriosis patients (n = 60) from controls (n = 20) [41].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 3. Blood Biomarkers > 3.1. Glycoproteins
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [41] source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“This delay in diagnosis is due, in part, to presumptive treatment of pain with oral contraceptives (OCPs) and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), as well as reluctance of physicians to refer women to gynecologists for definitive diagnosis, reluctance of women to confront their own pain for fear of a cancer diagnosis, and dismissal of pain, especially dysmenorrhea, as a “normal” event [”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 1. Background
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [12] source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Another ovarian tumor marker, CA-19-9, has been shown to be elevated in endometriosis and has a comparable or lower sensitivity than CA-125 for the detection of endometriosis [23].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 3. Blood Biomarkers > 3.1. Glycoproteins
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [23] source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“CA-125 has been measured simultaneously with urocortin [34], chlamydia antibody [35], CD23 [39], and inflammatory cytokines [32]. However, none of these combinations provided a sufficiently high sensitivity or specificity for endometriosis and results remained unvalidated.”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 3. Blood Biomarkers > 3.1. Glycoproteins
What the sources say
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In a study conducted by Signorile and Baldi, Zinc (Zn)-alpha2-glycoprotein was identified by mass spectrometry (endometriosis cases n = 5, controls n = 5) as a possible biomarker for endometriosis and confirmed by ELISA to be differentially expressed (P = 0.019) in an additional cohort of endometriosis patients (n = 120) and healthy controls (n = 20) [45].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 3. Blood Biomarkers > 3.1. Glycoproteins
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [45] source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A different study assessing glycodelin A found a significant increase in serum of women with endometrioma (n = 57) compared with control women undergoing sterilization or having benign ovarian cysts (n = 42) and demonstrated the potential use of glycodelin A as a biomarker for ovarian endometriosis with a sensitivity of 82.1% and a sensitivity of 78.4% [47].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 3. Blood Biomarkers > 3.1. Glycoproteins
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [47] source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Follistatin, an inhibitor of activin, has been shown to be increased in endometriosis patients [23], especially in a subgroup of patients with ovarian endometrioma, and showed good sensitivity and specificity [43].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 3. Blood Biomarkers > 3.1. Glycoproteins
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In a study by the same group, the inflammatory biomarker YKL-40 was significantly elevated (P < 0.001) in patients with endometriosis (n = 53) compared with patients without endometriosis (n = 35) and a positive correlation with disease severity was detected [53].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 3. Blood Biomarkers > 3.2. Immunological Markers and Inflammatory Cytokines
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [53] source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In peripheral blood, IL-8, MCP-1, and RANTES showed potential as a biomarker, being significantly increased in endometriosis cases versus controls in, respectively, 46.1%, 50%, and 75% of the assessed studies [54].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 3. Blood Biomarkers > 3.2. Immunological Markers and Inflammatory Cytokines
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [54] source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Reported sensitivity was 69.4% and specificity was 100% [45].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 3. Blood Biomarkers > 3.1. Glycoproteins
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [45] source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 120Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In a study by Vodolazkaia et al., univariate analysis showed the differential expression of several cytokines and chemokines in 232 women with endometriosis and 121 controls [24]. However, no cytokines or chemokines were included in the final proposed panel of biomarkers after multivariate analysis [24].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 3. Blood Biomarkers > 3.2. Immunological Markers and Inflammatory Cytokines
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [24] source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 232Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In a study by Chen et al., PEDF was significantly decreased in women with endometriosis (n = 43) compared with women without endometriosis (n = 28), independent of the phase of the cycle and correlated with pain symptoms [71].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 3. Blood Biomarkers > 3.5. Angiogenesis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [71] source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Contrasting evidence exists on prolactin, leptin, luteinizing hormone (LH), and adiponectin levels in endometriosis patients versus controls, showing either no difference, an increase (prolactin, leptin LH) or a decrease (adiponectin) [23, 75, 76].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 3. Blood Biomarkers > 3.6. Hormones
What the sources say
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Elevations of fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2), angiogenin, and soluble Flt-I (VEGFR-1) in serum of women with endometriosis have all been recorded [23].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 3. Blood Biomarkers > 3.5. Angiogenesis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [23] source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Additionally, serum anti-PDIK1L [77] and anti-syntaxin 5 autoantibodies [78] were reported elevated in endometriosis patients.”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 3. Blood Biomarkers > 3.7. Autoantibodies
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) was suggested to be elevated in women with endometriosis [72], although this was not confirmed in an additional study [23, 73].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 3. Blood Biomarkers > 3.5. Angiogenesis
What the sources say
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Additionally, the potential use of circulating angiogenic cells as biomarkers for endometriosis has been examined, but no difference between endometriosis patients and controls could be detected [98].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 3. Blood Biomarkers > 3.12. Cell Populations
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [98] source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“These studies have shown promising results; however, proteomics technologies are costly and time-consuming [23], and there is a need for better standardization and reproducibility of proteomic technologies before they can be used reliably in clinical research projects [17].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 3. Blood Biomarkers > 3.9. Proteomics
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Reduced plasma levels of miR-17-5p, miR-20a, and miR-22 [86] and elevated plasma levels of miR-16, miR-191, and miR-195 [87] have been found in women with endometriosis compared with women without endometriosis.”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 3. Blood Biomarkers > 3.8. miRNA
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Both total immunoglobulin levels and antiendometrial antibodies have been investigated as potential biomarkers for endometriosis of which the latter showed the most promising results, being more commonly present in endometriosis patients than in controls [23].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 3. Blood Biomarkers > 3.7. Autoantibodies
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [23] source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Though legitimizing urine as a diagnostic medium, this finding also suggests potential for reduced specificity, and it will be important to assess the ability of a urinary assay to differentiate endometriosis from other inflammatory conditions.”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 4. Urine Biomarkers
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This finding highlights both the prospect for miRNA dysregulation in the pathogenesis of endometrial disorders and the importance of accounting for menstrual cycle phase in the interpretation of miRNA profiles in biomarker discovery protocols.”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 5. Endometrial Biomarkers > 5.2. MicroRNAs
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Relative to blood, urine evidences a significantly narrower dynamic range of proteins, thereby allowing more rapid preparation of specimens for proteomic interrogation.”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 4. Urine Biomarkers
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [105] source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A systematic review of over 200 potential endometrial biomarkers, including hormones and their receptors (n = 29), cytokines (n = 25), factors identified through proteomics (n = 8), and histology (n = 10) revealed sensitivity and specificity (reported in only 32 articles) ranging from 0 to 100% [113].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 5. Endometrial Biomarkers
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [113] source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“First, the endometrium evidences remarkable sex steroid-driven cyclic variation and regenerative capacity.”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 5. Endometrial Biomarkers
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [109] source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Additionally, the urine proteome is relatively stable for up to six hours at room temperature and for over 17 years stored at −70°C [105].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 4. Urine Biomarkers
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [105] source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“MicroRNAs (miRNAs) evidence differential expression in the endometrium of women with versus without endometriosis and therefore offer potential as an endometriosis biomarker.”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 5. Endometrial Biomarkers > 5.2. MicroRNAs
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Interestingly, the dysregulation of miRNAs was cycle phase independent, though the relatively small sample size limited definitive correlation.”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 5. Endometrial Biomarkers > 5.2. MicroRNAs
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [121] source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 7Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Nerve fibers were first detected in peritoneal endometriotic lesions and these were thought to contribute to associated dysmenorrhea [137].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 5. Endometrial Biomarkers > 5.4. Neuronal Marker
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [137] source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Functional endometrial layer nerve fibers assessed by PGP9.5 immunostaining were detected in 9 of 45 (22%) of histologically confirmed cases of endometriosis and in 6 of 21 (29%) of women without endometriosis.”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 5. Endometrial Biomarkers > 5.4. Neuronal Marker
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [143] source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“This group further compared miRNA expression in women with mild and severe endometriosis and found increased endometrial expression of miR-21 and DICER in the more advanced stage of the disease [126].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 5. Endometrial Biomarkers > 5.2. MicroRNAs
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [126] source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These studies highlight molecular pathways that may be associated with the development of endometriosis as well as the changes in expression signature that exist in ectopically located endometrial tissue.”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 5. Endometrial Biomarkers > 5.2. MicroRNAs
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Other miRNAs and predicted cognate mRNAs demonstrating differential expression in eutopic endometrium from women with and without endometriosis include miR-23a/CYP19A1 and miR-542-3p/COX2 [128], miR-126/CRK [129] and miR23a/NR5A1 [130].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 5. Endometrial Biomarkers > 5.2. MicroRNAs
What the sources say
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The specificity of endometrial nerve fiber density was further challenged by the finding of similar endometrial innervation and neuronal growth fibers in women with adenomyosis, with expression reported to be more correlated with pelvic pain than diagnosis [144].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 5. Endometrial Biomarkers > 5.4. Neuronal Marker
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [144] source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The adoption of validated, internationally agreed upon standard operating procedures (SOPs) for tissue sample collection, processing and storage, and standardized phenotypic and other patient data collection, are crucial to optimise sample quality, reduce variability, and enable cross-centre studies [17, 113, 148].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 6. Standard Operating Procedures
What the sources say
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
In the paper
“A more recent study revealed 156 miRNAs differentially expressed between endometriotic tissue and normal endometrium, including twelve miRNAs known to be involved in fibrinolysis and angiogenesis [124].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 5. Endometrial Biomarkers > 5.2. MicroRNAs
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [124] source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Many centres worldwide have been collecting blood or other body fluids such as peritoneal fluid, endometrial fluid, and menstrual fluid, as well as tissue samples—in particular ectopic and eutopic endometrium—from women with and without endometriosis, for a variety of research purposes [145–147].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 6. Standard Operating Procedures
What the sources say
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“In a study of sharp curettage and full thickness hysterectomy specimens, PGP9.5 immunostained nerve fibers were detected in the functional endometrial layer from all women with surgically confirmed endometriosis but none of the specimens from unaffected controls, and this finding was cycle phase independent [139].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 5. Endometrial Biomarkers > 5.4. Neuronal Marker
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [139] source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“To date, the utility of miRNAs as biomarkers for endometriosis has not been specifically tested.”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 5. Endometrial Biomarkers > 5.2. MicroRNAs
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Notably, the reports of miR-23a expression in eutopic endometrium from women with and without endometriosis showed opposite directions of dysregulation, with one study involving proliferative endometrial specimens and the other including only early to midsecretory samples.”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 5. Endometrial Biomarkers > 5.2. MicroRNAs
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Recently, the World Endometriosis Research Foundation (WERF) Endometriosis Phenome and Biobanking Harmonisation Project (EPHect) has developed a consensus on standardisation and harmonisation of phenotypic surgical/clinical data and biologic sample collection methods in endometriosis research [146, 147, 149, 150].”
§ Update on Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometriosis > 6. Standard Operating Procedures
What the sources say
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper relies on this without support.
MALDI-TOF does not allow direct identification of peptides or proteins that are differentially synthesized or secreted.
“Importantly, MALDI-TOF does not allow direct identification of peptides or proteins that are differentially synthesized or secreted, which is fundamental to further validation and clinical assay development, although protein pattern recognition holds promise for the future.”
The paper relies on this without support.
SELDI-TOF MS methodology provides differential proteomic profiles in the form of mass/charge (m/z) peaks without attendant characterization of the peptides or proteins.
“Importantly, the SELDI-TOF MS methodology provides differential proteomic profiles in the form of mass/charge (m/z) peaks without attendant characterization of the peptides or proteins.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The studies showed that a panel of cytokines, rather than a single biomarker, improve sensitivity and specificity values, with some panels showing the ability to discriminate between different stages of disease.”
From Biomarkers in endometriosis: Challenges and opportunities (2017) · cites this paper as [71]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Reported panel accuracy does not match sensitivity, specificity, and group sizes
MajorWith 60 patients and 20 controls, 90% sensitivity gives 54 correct patient classifications and 70% specificity gives 14 correct control classifications. Overall accuracy is therefore 68/80, or 85%, not 88.7%. The check repeats 90 three times to represent the 3:1 patient-to-control ratio.
Reported 88.7 · recomputed 85
“Ozhan et al. stated that a panel consisting of CA-125, syntaxin-5, and laminin-1 had 90% sensitivity, 70% specificity, and 88.7% accuracy to distinguish endometriosis patients (n = 60) from controls (n = 20) [41].”
Nine of 45 cases is 20%, not 22%
MinorThe stated count gives 9/45 = 20%. The nearby figure of 6/21 = 29% is consistent with rounding.
Reported 22 · recomputed 20
“Functional endometrial layer nerve fibers assessed by PGP9.5 immunostaining were detected in 9 of 45 (22%) of histologically confirmed cases of endometriosis and in 6 of 21 (29%) of women without endometriosis.”
Two different sensitivities are given for glycodelin A
MinorThe sentence assigns two different sensitivity values to glycodelin A for the same stated diagnostic use, without distinguishing the measures.
“a sensitivity of 82.1%”
“a sensitivity of 78.4%”
Citations
Cites
2 retracted
Pan, Q., Luo, X., Toloubeydokhti, T., & Chegini, N. (2007) · Molecular Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/molehr/gam063 · Cited by 261 · cited 1×
“In contrast to studies comparing miRNA expression in eutopic versus ectopic endometrium, relatively few studies have compared miRNA expression in eutopic endometrium from women with and without surgically confirmed endometriosis [120, 125, 126].”
RetractedThe Expression and Ovarian Steroid Regulation of Endometrial Micro-RNAs
Toloubeydokhti, T., Pan, Q., Luo, X., Bukulmez, O., & Chegini, N. (2008) · Reproductive Sciences · doi:10.1177/1933719108324132 · Cited by 83 · cited 1×
“Other miRNAs and predicted cognate mRNAs demonstrating differential expression in eutopic endometrium from women with and without endometriosis include miR-23a/CYP19A1 and miR542-3p/COX2 [128], miR-126/CRK [129] andmiR23a/NR5A1 [130].”
RetractedMicroRNAs: Target Recognition and Regulatory Functions
Bartel, D. P. (2009) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2009.01.002 · Cited by 20,068 · cited 1×
“For example, most miRNA are able to regulate several hundred transcripts and several miRNA often regulate the same mRNA target [82].”
miRBase: tools for microRNA genomics
Griffiths‐Jones, S., Saini, H. K., van Dongen, S., & Enright, A. J. (2007) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkm952 · Cited by 4,432 · cited 1×
“With over 2200 distinct miRNAs identified to date, miRNA regulatory mechanisms are redundant, overlapping, and complex [81].”
Giudice, L. C., & Kao, L. C. (2004) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(04)17403-5 · Cited by 3,166
Self-citationSampson, J. A. (1927) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9378(15)30003-x · Cited by 2,334
Giudice, L. C. (2010) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmcp1000274 · Cited by 1,924
Self-citationEskenazi, B., & Warner, M. L. (1997) · Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/s0889-8545(05)70302-8 · Cited by 1,617
Nnoaham, K. E., Hummelshoj, L., Webster, P., d’Hooghe, T., de Cicco Nardone, F., de Cicco Nardone, C., Jenkinson, C., Kennedy, S. H., & Zondervan, K. T. (2011) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.05.090 · Cited by 1,584 · cited 2×
“Endometriosis is a major cause of disability and significantly compromised quality of life in women and adolescents [3].”
Self-citationSimoens, S., Dunselman, G., Dirksen, C., Hummelshoj, L., Bokor, A., Brandes, I., Brodszky, V., Canis, M., Colombo, G. L., DeLeire, T., et al. (2012) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/des073 · Cited by 1,070 · cited 1×
“A worldwide study of costs caused by endometriosis indicates that the average annual total costs per woman are 9579 euros, of which 66% is caused by costs for productivity loss, while medication counts for only 10% of the total yearly costs [26].”
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 149 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- 1927, American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 14, 442
- 2014, Biomarkers of endometriosis, 321
- 10.1093/humupd/dmq009 · DOI · Paper page
- 2008, Health economics of endometriosis, 1
- 2011, Minerva Ginecologica, 63, 195
- 2013, International Journal of Fertility and Sterility, 7, 96
- 2003, Di Yi Jun Yi Da Xue Xue Bao, 23, 757
- 2008, Anticancer Research, 28, 119
- 2014, Biomarkers of endometriosis
- 2000, Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, 85, 3292
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Clinical diagnosis of endometriosis: a call to action
Agarwal, S. K., Chapron, C., Giudice, L. C., Laufer, M. R., Leyland, N., Missmer, S. A., Singh, S. S., & Taylor, H. S. (2019) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2018.12.039 · Cited by 843
Self-citationBlood biomarkers for the non-invasive diagnosis of endometriosis
Nisenblat, V., Bossuyt, P. M., Shaikh, R., Farquhar, C. M., Jordan, V., Scheffers, C. S., Mol, B. W., JOHNSON, N. P., & Hull, M. L. (2016) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd012179 · Cited by 401
Fertile ground: human endometrial programming and lessons in health and disease
Evans, J., Salamonsen, L. A., Winship, A., Menkhorst, E. M., Nie, G., Gargett, C. E., & Dimitriadis, E. (2016) · Nature Reviews Endocrinology · doi:10.1038/nrendo.2016.116 · Cited by 378
Biomarkers in endometriosis: Challenges and opportunities
Ahn, S. H., Singh, V., & Tayade, C. (2017) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.01.009 · Cited by 242
Combination of the non-invasive tests for the diagnosis of endometriosis
Nisenblat, V., Prentice, L., Bossuyt, P. M., Farquhar, C. M., Hull, M. L., & JOHNSON, N. P. (2016) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd012281 · Cited by 231
Metadata
- Authors
- Fassbender, A., Burney, R. O., F. O, D., D’Hooghe, T., & Giudice, L.
- Affiliations
- Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven (BE)
- Madigan Army Medical Center (US)
- Department of Development and Regeneration, Organ Systems, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- Corresponding author
- D’Hooghe, Thomas
- Giudice, Linda
- Venue
- BioMed Research International
- Publisher
- Hindawi Limited
- Published
- 2015
- Volume
- 2015
- Pages
- 1-14
- ISSN
- 1110-7243 (ISSN-L)
- 2314-6133
- 2314-6141
- PMC
- PMC4512573
- OpenAlex
- W1935876281
- Semantic Scholar
- 49184ea27e4695119ebaa60bce32622318c29b7e
- Cited by
- 195
- References
- 149
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 3.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- BioMed Research International (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P50HD055764)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
- Keywords
- endometriosis, biomarkers, early diagnosis, plasma biomarkers, urinary biomarkers, endometrium, infertility, pelvic pain, delayed diagnosis
- MeSH terms
- Endometriosis, Endometrium, Female, Humans, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results, Biomarkers, Early Diagnosis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review