Cited by 452Gut microbiota and healthNutritional Studies and DietGastrointestinal motility and disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 530 of the 531 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 409 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Diet and the Microbiota–Gut–Brain Axis: Sowing the Seeds of Good Mental Health

Open access
Berding, Kirsten, Vlckova, Klara, Marx, Wolfgang, Schellekens, Harriet, Stanton, Catherine, Clarke, Gerard, Jacka, Felice, Dinan, Timothy G, Cryan, John F·2021·Advances in Nutrition

Abstract

Over the past decade, the gut microbiota has emerged as a key component in regulating brain processes and behavior. Diet is one of the major factors involved in shaping the gut microbiota composition across the lifespan. However, whether and how diet can affect the brain via its effects on the microbiota is only now beginning to receive attention. Several mechanisms for gut-to-brain communication have been identified, including microbial metabolites, immune, neuronal, and metabolic pathways, some of which could be prone to dietary modulation. Animal studies investigating the potential of nutritional interventions on the microbiota-gut-brain axis have led to advancements in our understanding of the role of diet in this bidirectional communication. In this review, we summarize the current state of the literature triangulating diet, microbiota, and host behavior/brain processes and discuss potential underlying mechanisms. Additionally, determinants of the responsiveness to a dietary intervention and evidence for the microbiota as an underlying modulator of the effect of diet on brain health are outlined. In particular, we emphasize the understudied use of whole-dietary approaches in this endeavor and the need for greater evidence from clinical populations. While promising results are reported, additional data, specifically from clinical cohorts, are required to provide evidence-based recommendations for the development of microbiota-targeted, whole-dietary strategies to improve brain and mental health.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/advances/nmaa181

Cites

530 of 530 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 of 409 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

Show all 156 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 119
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 3
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 6
123 of 123
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Findings from animal models of diet-microbiota-gut-brain interactions are informative about human biology.

    “Animal studies investigating the potential of nutritional interventions on the microbiota-gut-brain axis have led to advancements in our understanding of the role of diet in this bidirectional communication.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Chemical properties of different fibers determine the location of metabolism within the gastrointestinal tract, leading to specific microbial changes in response to their ingestion.

    “More specifically, the chemical properties (e.g., polymerization, solubility, and viscosity) of different fibers determine the location of metabolism within the gastrointestinal tract, leading to specific microbial changes in response to their ingestion.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Adequate maternal nutrition is key to the development of the growing fetus and nutrient inadequacies are established causes for neurological abnormalities.

    “Adequate maternal nutrition is key to the development of the growing fetus and nutrient inadequacies are established causes for neurological abnormalities (e.g., low folate intake and neural tube defect).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Microbiota underdevelopment due to inadequate nutrition can have overarching consequences.

    “Microbiota underdevelopment due to inadequate nutrition can have overarching consequences.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There is a lack of research studies investigating factors that predict the effect of diet interventions on cognitive outcomes.

    “While advances in predicting an individual's response to a diet intervention have been made, there is a lack of research studies investigating factors that predict the effect on cognitive outcomes.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There is no clear consensus yet as to how dietary patterns direct host responses.

    “Extensive characterization of baseline dietary habits will also be crucial, as there is no clear consensus yet as to how dietary patterns direct host responses.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Dietary fiber is fermented by the gut microbiota, supporting the growth and activity of SCFA-producing bacteria and increasing the production of SCFAs.

    “Inaccessible to the host, dietary fiber is fermented by the gut microbiota, supporting the growth and activity of SCFAproducing bacteria and increasing the production of SCFAs.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    SCFAs can directly or indirectly signal to the brain, influencing brain physiology and behavior.

    “In turn, SCFAs can directly or indirectly signal to the brain, influencing brain physiology and behavior.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    ω-3 fatty acids or polyphenols are potent modulators of brain physiology and can be neuroprotective.

    “On its own, these nutrients are potent modulators of brain physiology and can be neuroprotective.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Microbial extinction is partly attributed to unhealthy eating patterns, such as increased consumption of processed and fried food and low fiber intake.

    “Given the increasing knowledge that microbial extinction is partly attributed to unhealthy eating patterns, such as increased consumption of processed and fried food and low fiber intake, it may be that future nutritional interventions will combine dietary approaches with specifically designed probiotics in order for the dietary intervention to be effective.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There has been little human research investigating the diet-microbiota-brain interaction thus far.

    “While preclinical studies have begun to elucidate the diet-microbiota-brain interaction, there has been little human research investigating this intricate relation thus far.”
11 of 11

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Figure reverses which factor is the moderator

    Minor

    The text describes the microbiota as strengthening the diet-host relation, whereas Figure 3 describes diet as strengthening or weakening the microbiota-brain relation.

  • Claim of improved Alzheimer's biomarkers conflicts with table

    Minor

    The narrative says microbial changes correlated with improved cerebrospinal-fluid biomarkers after the diet, but Table 2 says postintervention changes in those biomarkers were not reported.

2 of 2

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 531 references

1 of the 531 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Salonen, 2014, Impact of diet and individual variation on intestinal microbiota composition and fermentation products in obese men, ISME J, 8, 2218, 10.1038/ismej.2014.63 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 452

Metadata

Authors
Berding, K., Vlckova, K., Marx, W., Schellekens, H., Stanton, C., Clarke, G., Jacka, F., Dinan, T. G., & Cryan, J. F.
Affiliations
  • APC Microbiome Institute (IE)
  • Barwon Health (AU)
  • Teagasc - The Irish Agriculture and Food Development Authority (IE)
  • University College Cork (IE)
Corresponding author
Cryan, John F
Venue
Advances in Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-07
Volume
12
Issue
4
Pages
1239-1285
ISSN
  • 2156-5376 (ISSN-L)
  • 2161-8313
OpenAlex
W3135540293
Cited by
451
References
531
Citations by year
2026: 130 · 2025: 120 · 2024: 87 · 2023: 67 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 9
FWCI
2.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Advances in Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ResearchOnline - JCU (James Cook University) (submittedVersion)
  • Deakin Research Online (Deakin University) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • T-Stór (Teagasc) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Funders
  • APC Microbiome Ireland
  • Science Foundation Ireland (12/RC/2273 P2)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
Keywords
gut microbiota, microbiota-gut-brain axis, diet, mental health, microbial metabolites, immune pathways, neural pathways, metabolic pathways, dietary intervention, brain health
MeSH terms
Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Animals, Brain, Diet, Humans, Mental Health, Microbiota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-09, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-09 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review