The DOI matches its Crossref record; 410 of the 410 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 1 of the 515 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Evaluating psychosocial contributions to chronic pain outcomes
Open accessAbstract
The biopsychosocial model of pain dominates the scientific community's understanding of chronic pain. Indeed, the biopsychosocial approach describes pain and disability as a multidimensional, dynamic integration among physiological, psychological, and social factors that reciprocally influence one another. In this article, we review two categories of studies that evaluate the contributions of psychosocial factors to the experience of chronic pain. First, we consider general psychosocial variables including distress, trauma, and interpersonal factors. Additionally, we discuss pain-specific psychosocial variables including catastrophizing, expectations, and pain-related coping. Together, we present a diverse array of psychological, social, and contextual factors and highlight the need to consider their roles in the development, maintenance, and treatment of chronic pain conditions.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
202 Not checked yet · 27 Own interpretation · 6 No basis given · 1 Partly supported · accuracy not yet measured
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Expectations regarding pain also impact pain perception.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > RACE AS A CONTRIBUTING PSYCHOBIOLOGICAL FACTOR
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [244] sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The paper’s introductory discussion defines catastrophizing as a negative cognitive set during actual or anticipated pain and reports its association with heightened pain experience. That supports a narrower link between pain-related thinking and reported pain, but the paper does not establish that expectations generally cause changes in pain perception. (LLM, conf=0.82)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These psychosocial factors then influence individual variability in pain-related outcomes.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Introduction
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“psychosocial variables such as depression, anxiety, and distress are among the most potent and robust predictors of the transition from acute to chronic pain 13–18.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Introduction
What the sources say
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“longitudinal, observational research supports a strong bidirectional link between mood disorders and persistent pain”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Introduction
What the sources say
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“the development of an enduring pain condition confers a substantially increased vulnerability for the subsequent diagnosis of an affective disorder”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Introduction
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“trait-based positive affect may buffer maladaptive pain-related behaviors such as fear of movement62.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > AFFECTIVE FACTORS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [62] source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“state-based positive affect has been identified as a mediator of resilience in the wake of chronic pain 59–61.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > AFFECTIVE FACTORS
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“There are strong prospective links between early-life traumatic experiences and the subsequent development of chronic pain 23, 24, 66–69.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > TRAUMA
What the sources say
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In another study of patients with chronic pain, individuals assigned to tailored positive activities reported greater improvements in pain intensity and pain control compared to those in an active control condition 65.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > AFFECTIVE FACTORS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [65] source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“positive affect and optimism are associated with less pain and dysfunction 57, 58.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > AFFECTIVE FACTORS
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“prospective studies suggest that pre-morbid psychological dysfunction represents a risk factor for the future development of numerous chronic pain conditions including musculoskeletal pain and functional pain disorders 14, 36–39.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > AFFECTIVE FACTORS
What the sources say
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Recent systematic reviews indicate that chronic pain patients, relative to pain-free controls, show elevations in all of these indices of self-reported negative affect 33–35.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > AFFECTIVE FACTORS
What the sources say
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“That is, the psychological factor acts as a mediator (though not necessarily a causal mechanism) through which a treatment confers its benefits 30, 31.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Introduction
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“abuse in childhood conferred a 97% increase in risk for having a painful somatic syndrome such as fibromyalgia in adulthood 23.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > TRAUMA
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [23] source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Increasing evidence suggests an association between both psychological and physical trauma and chronic pain.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > TRAUMA
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“emotional distress and psychosocial stress have been shown to increase the likelihood of transitioning from acute to chronic musculoskeletal pain 18, 36, 37, 41, 42.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > AFFECTIVE FACTORS
What the sources say
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“there is a wealth of evidence that symptoms of depression, anxiety, and emotional distress contribute strongly (more strongly than pain intensity, in many studies) to key long-term outcomes of persistent pain such as physical disability 35, 43–46, work disability 47, healthcare costs 48, 49, mortality 50–53, and suicide 22, 54, 55.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > AFFECTIVE FACTORS
What the sources say
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Depression, anxiety, and general indices of emotional distress along with a cluster of negative emotions, thoughts, and behaviors termed, “negative affect,” are probably the most commonly-assessed psychological factors in patients with persistent pain 11, 32, 33.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > AFFECTIVE FACTORS
What the sources say
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In multivariate analyses, high pre-operative symptoms of depression remained the only significant predictor of failure to return to work after surgery, even in multivariate models with pre- and post-operative pain intensity included.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > AFFECTIVE FACTORS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [56] source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In one study by Hausmann and colleagues 64, participants who were asked to complete positive activities (e.g., listing three good things about their day) reported improvements in pain scores from baseline to 6 months.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > AFFECTIVE FACTORS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [64] source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“There is preliminary evidence suggesting that PAIs can be effective in the treatment of chronic pain.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > AFFECTIVE FACTORS
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“childhood physical, sexual, and psychological abuse have all been demonstrated as risk factors for the development of chronic pain conditions in adulthood including fibromyalgia, irritable bowel syndrome, chronic pelvic pain, and temporomandibular joint disorders23, 69, 70.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > TRAUMA
What the sources say
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“in patients with low back pain, positive affect has been shown to buffer the effects of negative affect such that patients with high levels of both positive and negative affect reporting less pain and depression and better functioning than those with high levels of negative affect and low levels of positive affect 58.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > AFFECTIVE FACTORS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [58] source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“higher levels of pre-surgical emotional distress were associated with more postsurgical pain and impairment 20, 40.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > AFFECTIVE FACTORS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [20] source
- Not checked yetcites [40]
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In this study, depression fully mediated the prospective association between pain intensity and occupational disability.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > AFFECTIVE FACTORS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [56] source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In a recent metaanalysis, the authors reported that the presence of past traumas is associated with a 2- to 3-fold increase in the development of chronic widespread pain23.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > TRAUMA
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [23] source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Social forces also impact pain and pain-related outcomes.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > SOCIAL/INTERPERSONAL FACTORS
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“It is also associated with elevated pain severity and disability among abuse victims 73, 74.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > TRAUMA
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“parents’ reactions to children’s pain have also been shown to play an important determining role in children’s pain responses 110–114”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > SOCIAL/INTERPERSONAL FACTORS
What the sources say
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“PTSD symptoms have been shown to mediate the relationship between childhood abuse and maltreatment and pain and pain-related limitations later in life 75, 76.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > TRAUMA
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“the operant conditioning model of chronic pain posits that others’ responses to pain behavior play a role in chronic pain and disability 2, 105.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > SOCIAL/INTERPERSONAL FACTORS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [2] source
- Not checked yetcites [105]
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“couples- based interventions for patients with painful cancers appear to show greater efficacy than either treatment as usual or exclusively patient-focused interventions 102–104”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > SOCIAL/INTERPERSONAL FACTORS
What the sources say
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“there is evidence to suggest some categories of traumatic stress are stronger risk factors for pain than others.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > TRAUMA
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“social support may serve as a treatment target for chronic pain.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > SOCIAL/INTERPERSONAL FACTORS
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“it remains difficult to identify the degree to which PTSD and TBI can independently predict the development of chronic pain.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > TRAUMA
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“there is considerable evidence that a higher degree of solicitousness in response to pain behaviors predicts increased pain-related disability 85, 106–108.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > SOCIAL/INTERPERSONAL FACTORS
What the sources say
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The social environment and interaction between social support and solicitousness may be particularly important for persons with acquired amputation during the first few months after the amputation.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > SOCIAL/INTERPERSONAL FACTORS
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“in adult veterans, combat exposure and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) have been shown to have the strongest statistical association with chronic pain 23, 24.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > TRAUMA
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [23] source
- Not checked yetcites [24]
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“better social support was associated with less postoperative pain after surgical management of breast cancer in a recent meta-analysis 97.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > SOCIAL/INTERPERSONAL FACTORS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [97] source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In a review of more than a dozen studies, the authors found that increased perceived social support was associated with better outcomes such as less pain and improved overall functioning among persons with pain and physical disability related to spinal cord injury, multiple sclerosis, and acquired amputation 85.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > SOCIAL/INTERPERSONAL FACTORS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [85] source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The immediate social environment in the form of parents (for children experiencing pain) and spouses (for married adult patients with pain) exerts a powerful influence on pain-related outcomes.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > SOCIAL/INTERPERSONAL FACTORS
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“To date, most studies have focused on either perceived global social support (i.e., not pain-related) or solicitous social responses to pain behaviors (e.g., offering to take over tasks or encouragement to become less active) 85.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > SOCIAL/INTERPERSONAL FACTORS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [85] source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“social support is found to be associated with improved physical functioning for individuals with pain conditions 33, 87–89.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > SOCIAL/INTERPERSONAL FACTORS
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“results of a 3-decade prospective study suggest the presence of PTSD symptoms amplify the predictive effect of child abuse on later-life pain outcomes 77.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > TRAUMA
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [77] source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“the presence of a supportive partner has been associated with reduced symptom burden (including less pain), improved quality of life, and fewer symptoms of distress in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia 92, metastatic breast cancer 93, 94, and other cancer types such as colorectal cancer95, 96.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > SOCIAL/INTERPERSONAL FACTORS
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“individuals with childhood reports of distressing events such as hospitalizations or loss of a family member showed double the risk for the development of adult chronic pain even after adjusting for other important (and potentially confounding) predictors such as psychological distress and socioeconomic status 67”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > TRAUMA
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [67] source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“a recent study revealed that depression was associated with patient-physician discordance in estimates of disease severity (i.e., depressed patients estimated their disease severity as much worse, on average, than their physicians did) 146.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > SOCIAL/INTERPERSONAL FACTORS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [146] source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Li and colleagues studied workplace support among arthritis patients; those who reported low workplace support were much more likely to develop depressive symptoms and work-related disability 18 months later 133.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > SOCIAL/INTERPERSONAL FACTORS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [133] source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“creating and sustaining an effective therapeutic alliance appears to be a necessary and sufficient condition for promoting the pain-improving effects of diverse interventions 144–145.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > SOCIAL/INTERPERSONAL FACTORS
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“differing social and occupational structures across countries appear to contribute to cross-national differences in rates of return to work and occupational disability in the context of painful work injury.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > SOCIAL/INTERPERSONAL FACTORS
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Anema and colleagues 134 compared sustainable return-to-work rates between 6 different countries and found that differences in job characteristics and social disability systems were more important than medical interventions, patient, and injury-related factors in explaining the large between-country differences in rates of return to work following painful occupational injuries.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > SOCIAL/INTERPERSONAL FACTORS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [134] source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Patients’ attachment styles are also important predictors of pain-related outcomes among both children and adults.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > SOCIAL/INTERPERSONAL FACTORS
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In cancer pain, social support interpersonal interaction preferences (e.g., discomfort with closeness and interdependence in relationships) seem to play an important role in shaping pain reports and general health 91.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > SOCIAL/INTERPERSONAL FACTORS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [91] source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“There is considerable evidence suggesting greater pain prevalence in women when compared to men 150, 152–154.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > SEX AS A CONTRIBUTING PSYCHOBIOLOGICAL FACTOR
What the sources say
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In a study of patients with chronic pain, social support in the form of encouragement to persist in a task was negatively associated with disability 135.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > SOCIAL/INTERPERSONAL FACTORS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [135] source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Sex and gender are important factors in the perception and experience of pain 148–151.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > SEX AS A CONTRIBUTING PSYCHOBIOLOGICAL FACTOR
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the social environment can also be harnessed for adaptive purposes.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > SOCIAL/INTERPERSONAL FACTORS
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“women demonstrate a greater sensitivity to multiple modalities of experimental pain when compared with men 161.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > SEX AS A CONTRIBUTING PSYCHOBIOLOGICAL FACTOR
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [161] source
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“A handful of studies suggest that an index of the therapeutic relationship (i.e., the working alliance) statistically mediates the positive effects of rehabilitative treatments among people with musculoskeletal pain 141–145.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > SOCIAL/INTERPERSONAL FACTORS
What the sources say
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“During psychotherapeutic treatment, for example, establishing a sound therapeutic relationship between patient and therapist is crucial for producing good outcomes 140.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > SOCIAL/INTERPERSONAL FACTORS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [140] source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“It is clear that the interactions between patients with chronic pain and their significant others can either facilitate or impair adjustment to chronic pain 87, 120–122.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > SOCIAL/INTERPERSONAL FACTORS
What the sources say
boostedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“among couples, high levels of spousal depressive symptoms predict worsening patient disability and disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis over a 1-year period 123.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > SOCIAL/INTERPERSONAL FACTORS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [123] source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In a recent randomized controlled trial examining patients with LBP and their spouses, the spouse-assisted intervention produced larger decreases in fear of pain and catastrophizing than the standard multidisciplinary intervention 139.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > SOCIAL/INTERPERSONAL FACTORS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [139] source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Parental attention to pain and solicitous behaviors that encourage children to avoid regular activities may provide specific pathways by which parental catastrophizing amplifies a child’s pain experience and behavior 116–118, 119.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > SOCIAL/INTERPERSONAL FACTORS
What the sources say
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Patients with partners showing avoidant and anxious attachment styles are more likely to report increased pain and decreased well-being 103, 124–127.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > SOCIAL/INTERPERSONAL FACTORS
What the sources say
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“there is consistent evidence to suggest hormones influence sex differences in clinical pain conditions.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > SEX AS A CONTRIBUTING PSYCHOBIOLOGICAL FACTOR
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“among individuals with depression, women are more likely to report pain complaints than men 213, 214”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > SEX AS A CONTRIBUTING PSYCHOBIOLOGICAL FACTOR
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [213] source
- Not checked yetcites [214]
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“compared to men, women have endorsed more frequent use of catastrophizing, behavioral activities, positive self-statements, social and emotional support, and problem-focused coping 148, 201–204.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > SEX AS A CONTRIBUTING PSYCHOBIOLOGICAL FACTOR
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“catastrophizing has been shown to mediate the sex differences in pain-related outcomes, clinical pain, and experimental pain 162, 205, 206.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > SEX AS A CONTRIBUTING PSYCHOBIOLOGICAL FACTOR
What the sources say
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“the severity of symptoms for several pain conditions including irritable bowel syndrome, temporomandibular disorders, headache, and fibromyalgia varies across the menstrual cycle 185–191.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > SEX AS A CONTRIBUTING PSYCHOBIOLOGICAL FACTOR
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Sex differences in pain perception can also be accounted for by a number of psychological factors including coping, catastrophizing, and affective distress.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > SEX AS A CONTRIBUTING PSYCHOBIOLOGICAL FACTOR
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Although anxiety is more prevalent among females 209, 210”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > SEX AS A CONTRIBUTING PSYCHOBIOLOGICAL FACTOR
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“It is well-documented that, compared to White individuals, Black individuals demonstrate increased pain sensitivity.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > RACE AS A CONTRIBUTING PSYCHOBIOLOGICAL FACTOR
What the sources say
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“A number of studies have demonstrated an association between endorsing masculinity and a higher pain threshold and tolerance and lower pain ratings 194–198.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > SEX AS A CONTRIBUTING PSYCHOBIOLOGICAL FACTOR
What the sources say
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Sex differences in the endogenous opioid system may also account for sex differences in the pain experience.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > SEX AS A CONTRIBUTING PSYCHOBIOLOGICAL FACTOR
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Gender roles, for example, are associated with pain responses.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > SEX AS A CONTRIBUTING PSYCHOBIOLOGICAL FACTOR
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“and women with chronic pain are more likely to experience depression.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > SEX AS A CONTRIBUTING PSYCHOBIOLOGICAL FACTOR
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [213] source
- Not checked yetcites [214]
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The sex differences observed in the pain experience may be caused by a number of biological, psychological, and sociocultural factors.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > SEX AS A CONTRIBUTING PSYCHOBIOLOGICAL FACTOR
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“However, a second subset of studies have found no sex differences in DNIC response 179–181.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > SEX AS A CONTRIBUTING PSYCHOBIOLOGICAL FACTOR
What the sources say
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Psychosocial mechanisms also contribute to the sex differences in the pain experience.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > SEX AS A CONTRIBUTING PSYCHOBIOLOGICAL FACTOR
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“There are also notable race differences in pain coping.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > RACE AS A CONTRIBUTING PSYCHOBIOLOGICAL FACTOR
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [247] source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Black individuals have reported higher levels of pain for clinical conditions such as AIDS, glaucoma, arthritis, post-operative pain, post-spinal fusion pain, and low back pain 216–220.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > RACE AS A CONTRIBUTING PSYCHOBIOLOGICAL FACTOR
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Preliminary evidence suggests that expectations for pain sensitivity and willingness to report pain differ based on race and ethnicity, which may help explain race difference in pain sensitivity 245, 246.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > RACE AS A CONTRIBUTING PSYCHOBIOLOGICAL FACTOR
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [245]
- Not checked yetcites [246] source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Native American participants in a laboratory pain study were actually less pain-sensitive than non- Hispanic Whites on measures of acute pain sensitivity”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > RACE AS A CONTRIBUTING PSYCHOBIOLOGICAL FACTOR
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [227] source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The meaning of pain (i.e. how individuals appraise pain) can be influenced by sociocultural factors and ethnic background 242, 243.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > RACE AS A CONTRIBUTING PSYCHOBIOLOGICAL FACTOR
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The differential experience of psychological distress may well contribute to race differences in pain sensitivity.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > RACE AS A CONTRIBUTING PSYCHOBIOLOGICAL FACTOR
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Chronic socioeconomic strain and racism lead to high levels of sympathetic nervous system activation and physiological exhaustion making the individual more sensitive to painful stimuli 251.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > RACE AS A CONTRIBUTING PSYCHOBIOLOGICAL FACTOR
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [251] source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Racial differences in clinical and experimental pain sensitivity may be due to a variety of reasons including biological factors.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > RACE AS A CONTRIBUTING PSYCHOBIOLOGICAL FACTOR
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition to biological factors, psychosocial factors may account for race differences in pain sensitivity.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > RACE AS A CONTRIBUTING PSYCHOBIOLOGICAL FACTOR
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Black individuals experience reduced diffuse noxious inhibitory control (DNIC) of pain compared to non-Hispanic Whites, indicating ethnic differences in endogenous pain inhibition 229.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > RACE AS A CONTRIBUTING PSYCHOBIOLOGICAL FACTOR
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [229]
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“individual differences in the application of paincoping strategies have an important influence on pain-related outcomes.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Pain-Specific Psychosocial Constructs > PAIN COPING
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In a recent meta-analysis, researchers found that Black Americans more frequently endorse the use of catastrophizing, hoping and praying, and passive coping compared to White Americans 247.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > RACE AS A CONTRIBUTING PSYCHOBIOLOGICAL FACTOR
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [247] source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Likewise, higher levels of anxiety are associated with increased pain sensitivity 236.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > RACE AS A CONTRIBUTING PSYCHOBIOLOGICAL FACTOR
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [236] source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Campbell and colleagues 228 found that compared to Caucasians, African Americans have a lower threshold for the nociceptive flexion reflex, a measurement of pain induced spinal reflexes.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > RACE AS A CONTRIBUTING PSYCHOBIOLOGICAL FACTOR
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [228] source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Differences in central pain-inhibitory mechanisms may also underlie racial differences in pain sensitivity.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > RACE AS A CONTRIBUTING PSYCHOBIOLOGICAL FACTOR
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“there is evidence to suggest that both catastrophizing as well as praying mediate race differences in experimental pain 162, 222.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > RACE AS A CONTRIBUTING PSYCHOBIOLOGICAL FACTOR
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Furthermore, these expectations decreased the activation of pain-related brain regions, offering an explanation of how expectations influence pain sensations.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > RACE AS A CONTRIBUTING PSYCHOBIOLOGICAL FACTOR
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [244] source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Koyama and colleagues 244 found that expectations of decreased pain reduced the subjective experience of pain.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > RACE AS A CONTRIBUTING PSYCHOBIOLOGICAL FACTOR
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [244] source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Catastrophizing also impacts treatment effectiveness for pain-relieving interventions 300, 301, 309, including surgery310–312.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Pain-Specific Psychosocial Constructs > CATASTROPHIZING
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“the majority of studies indicate that ignoring pain does not predict pain-related outcomes such as pain interference, disability, or pain severity 291, 292.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Pain-Specific Psychosocial Constructs > PAIN COPING
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Evidence suggests an association between ignoring pain and both increased and decreased pain interference 281, 288–290.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Pain-Specific Psychosocial Constructs > PAIN COPING
What the sources say
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“while passive strategies are linked to poorer outcomes such as increased pain and depression 258, 267–270.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Pain-Specific Psychosocial Constructs > PAIN COPING
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“many studies have demonstrated that the benefits of analgesic therapies may be explained, in part, by their effects on cognitive emotional processes such as catastrophizing.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Pain-Specific Psychosocial Constructs > CATASTROPHIZING
What the sources say
boostedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In a study aimed at identifying predictors of treatment responders for persistent orofacial pain, researchers found that baseline levels of catastrophizing were more than one standard deviation higher in the non-responder group than for responders 316.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Pain-Specific Psychosocial Constructs > CATASTROPHIZING
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [316] source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In randomized controlled trials, individuals with high pretreatment levels of catastrophizing demonstrated less benefit from topical analgesics 313, oral analgesics 309, and psychosocial treatments314, 315.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Pain-Specific Psychosocial Constructs > CATASTROPHIZING
What the sources say
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“There is also evidence suggesting that, compared to problem-focused coping, emotion- focused coping is associated with worse pain and functioning in individuals with chronic pain 267, 271–277.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Pain-Specific Psychosocial Constructs > PAIN COPING
What the sources say
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There is also mixed evidence for the relationship between ignoring pain and pain-related outcomes.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Pain-Specific Psychosocial Constructs > PAIN COPING
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“it also shows a unique and specific influence on pain-related outcomes 297–299.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Pain-Specific Psychosocial Constructs > CATASTROPHIZING
What the sources say
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“For patients receiving TENS treatment, those with higher baseline levels of catastrophizing experienced less pain reduction and reduced functional outcomes following treatment 317.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Pain-Specific Psychosocial Constructs > CATASTROPHIZING
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [317] source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“While catastrophizing positively correlates with general measures of negative affect such as depressive symptoms and anxiety, it also shows a unique and specific influence on pain-related outcomes 297–299.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Pain-Specific Psychosocial Constructs > CATASTROPHIZING
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“it shows weak correlations with functional variables such as pain interference and physical disability 281, 284–287.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Pain-Specific Psychosocial Constructs > PAIN COPING
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Studies in patients with musculoskeletal pain have indicated that catastrophizing is the single most important pre-treatment risk factor that impairs the effectiveness of pain-relieving interventions 300, 301”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Pain-Specific Psychosocial Constructs > CATASTROPHIZING
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“For individuals with chronic low back pain, musculoskeletal pain, and other miscellaneous chronic pain complains, catastrophizing is associated with increased pain intensity, pain disability, and psychological distress, even when controlling for level of physical impairment 295, 296.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Pain-Specific Psychosocial Constructs > CATASTROPHIZING
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Recent reviews have identified catastrophizing as a key phenotypic factor to assess in trials of analgesic treatments in patients with chronic pain 11.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Pain-Specific Psychosocial Constructs > CATASTROPHIZING
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [11] source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“it also overlaps and interacts with other psychosocial processes including depression, anxiety, distress, fear of pain, self-efficacy, optimism, and other positive factors 32, 306, 333, 334.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Pain-Specific Psychosocial Constructs > CATASTROPHIZING
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [32]
- Not checked yetcites [306] source
- Not checked yetcites [333]
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Within the Communal Coping Model framework, catastrophizing can be conceptualized as a coping strategy that activates the individual’s social environment by soliciting support or empathy 124, 294, 341, 342.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Pain-Specific Psychosocial Constructs > CATASTROPHIZING
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Consistent with the Cognitive Behavioral Model of chronic pain, there is evidence to suggest that pain catastrophizing influences pain-related disability via fear of pain 25, 335, 336.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Pain-Specific Psychosocial Constructs > CATASTROPHIZING
What the sources say
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In one study partner catastrophizing was associated with increased pain intensity in women with dyspareunia 344.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Pain-Specific Psychosocial Constructs > CATASTROPHIZING
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [344] source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“For children undergoing major surgery, parent pain catastrophizing scores predicted the child’s post-surgical pain intensity 116, 119, 345.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Pain-Specific Psychosocial Constructs > CATASTROPHIZING
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Likewise, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), which does not directly target catastrophizing, has shown to also be effective in reducing catastrophizing 324–327.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Pain-Specific Psychosocial Constructs > CATASTROPHIZING
What the sources say
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“A number of studies using longitudinal process analyses demonstrate that changes in catastrophizing and negative affect precede changes in clinical pain 30, 318–321.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Pain-Specific Psychosocial Constructs > CATASTROPHIZING
What the sources say
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“catastrophizing has been identified as an indirect mechanism of ACT in reducing pain related disability 328.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Pain-Specific Psychosocial Constructs > CATASTROPHIZING
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [328] source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“There is also evidence suggesting that substantial portions of the variability in end-of-treatment outcomes can be accounted for by early-treatment changes in catastrophizing 30, 31.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Pain-Specific Psychosocial Constructs > CATASTROPHIZING
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Catastrophizing is also a mechanism of change for non-psychosocial treatments.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Pain-Specific Psychosocial Constructs > CATASTROPHIZING
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“studies have shown that multidisciplinary treatment programs that include exercise as well as activity-based physical therapy also improve pain outcomes, in part, through reductions in catastrophizing 329–332.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Pain-Specific Psychosocial Constructs > CATASTROPHIZING
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“there is also evidence to suggest that catastrophizing by individuals in supportive roles (e.g. parent, spouse) also influences pain-related outcomes112, 115, 344.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Pain-Specific Psychosocial Constructs > CATASTROPHIZING
What the sources say
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“for patients with chronic low back pain, interventions aimed at increased engagement in graded physical activity as well as fear-provoking activities have been shown to reduce pain catastrophizing as well as functional disability 330.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Pain-Specific Psychosocial Constructs > CATASTROPHIZING
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [330] source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Although catastrophizing uniquely influences the experience of pain, it also overlaps and interacts with other psychosocial processes including depression, anxiety, distress, fear of pain, self-efficacy, optimism, and other positive factors 32, 306, 333, 334.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Pain-Specific Psychosocial Constructs > CATASTROPHIZING
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [32]
- Not checked yetcites [306] source
- Not checked yetcites [333]
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Catastrophizing also overlaps with social processes such as social support 108, 339, 340.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Pain-Specific Psychosocial Constructs > CATASTROPHIZING
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“CBT, which involves reframing negative automatic cognitions, such as catastrophic cognitions, is effective in reducing catastrophizing in individuals with chronic pain that has persisted for decades 322”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Pain-Specific Psychosocial Constructs > CATASTROPHIZING
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [322] source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“and its effects can last for months or years after treatment 323.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Pain-Specific Psychosocial Constructs > CATASTROPHIZING
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [323] source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In a study comparing CBT, physical therapy, and combined CBT and physical therapy, there were no between group differences in the pre- to post-treatment change in catastrophizing 329.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Pain-Specific Psychosocial Constructs > CATASTROPHIZING
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [329] source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“However, changes in catastrophizing over the duration of the treatment predicted changes in pain outcomes, even in the group that received only physical therapy, with no specific targeting of catastrophizing-related cognitions.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Pain-Specific Psychosocial Constructs > CATASTROPHIZING
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [329] source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“suggesting these social factors may be a mechanism by which catastrophizing affects pain outcomes.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Pain-Specific Psychosocial Constructs > CATASTROPHIZING
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“studies of the brain’s default mode network and other resting state networks suggest long-lasting functional brain changes related to the presence of chronic pain 379, 384–387.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Pain-Specific Psychosocial Constructs > PAIN-RELATED CNS PATHWAYS
What the sources say
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“There are reductions in gray matter in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and insula among patients with persistent pain 381–383.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Pain-Specific Psychosocial Constructs > PAIN-RELATED CNS PATHWAYS
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Pain-specific expectations also play a role in the effectiveness of both active treatments and placebo.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Pain-Specific Psychosocial Constructs > EXPECTATIONS
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“self-efficacy has been shown to be a key mechanism of change in Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (CBT) for chronic pain 145, 315, 375.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Pain-Specific Psychosocial Constructs > SELF-EFFICACY
What the sources say
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Similarly, self-efficacy mediates the relationship between pain and performance of valued activities in patients with rheumatoid arthritis 373.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Pain-Specific Psychosocial Constructs > SELF-EFFICACY
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [373] source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Pain-specific expectations have also been identified as one of the core mechanisms underlying placebo analgesia 365, 366.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Pain-Specific Psychosocial Constructs > EXPECTATIONS
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“predicts functional pain outcomes.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Pain-Specific Psychosocial Constructs > SELF-EFFICACY
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [270] source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Non-neural components of the central nervous system also appear to be affected with chronic low back pain patients showing enhanced microglial activation relative to pain-free controls 388.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Pain-Specific Psychosocial Constructs > PAIN-RELATED CNS PATHWAYS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [388] source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In a study of patients with persistent orofacial pain, self-efficacy mediated the CBT-related improvements in pain and disability 315.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Pain-Specific Psychosocial Constructs > SELF-EFFICACY
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [315] source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Further, studies show changes in functional connectivity in chronic pain patients.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Pain-Specific Psychosocial Constructs > PAIN-RELATED CNS PATHWAYS
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“pain specific expectations also influence pain intensity ratings in both laboratory and clinical settings 357–359.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Pain-Specific Psychosocial Constructs > EXPECTATIONS
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Positive outcome expectancy has been identified as a protective factorfrom the transition from acute to chronic pain 354–356.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Pain-Specific Psychosocial Constructs > EXPECTATIONS
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Currently, there is evidence for chronic pain-related alterations a number of cortical regions that are considered to be important for the perception of pain including the primary and secondary somatosensory cortices, insular and anterior cingulate cortices, the prefrontal cortices, and many subcortical areas.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Pain-Specific Psychosocial Constructs > PAIN-RELATED CNS PATHWAYS
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Pain-related self-efficacy also mediates the relationship between pain and functioning in women with fibromyalgia pain 372.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Pain-Specific Psychosocial Constructs > SELF-EFFICACY
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [372] source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“many of the psychosocial factors and, more specifically, pain- specific cognitive and affective processes, have strong associations with functional brain responses to pain.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Pain-Specific Psychosocial Constructs > PAIN-RELATED CNS PATHWAYS
What the sources say
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Such expectations have been shown to influence treatment outcomes for a number of active interventions including surgery, opioid analgesics, and acupuncture 360–363.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Pain-Specific Psychosocial Constructs > EXPECTATIONS
What the sources say
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Higher levels of catastrophizing are related to enhanced fMRI responses to calibrated noxious stimuli in areas such as anterior insular cortex among both fibromyalgia patients 396, and pain-free adults 397.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Pain-Specific Psychosocial Constructs > PAIN-RELATED CNS PATHWAYS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [396] source
- Not checked yetcites [397]
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Progress in structural and functional neuroimaging has been exponential in recent years producing evidence of alterations in both brain structure and function among patients with chronic pain 377, 378.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Pain-Specific Psychosocial Constructs > PAIN-RELATED CNS PATHWAYS
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, pain expectations are influencing the experience of pain at various stages, from acute pain intensity through the development and treatment of chronic”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Pain-Specific Psychosocial Constructs > EXPECTATIONS
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As the tenets of the biopsychosocial model suggest, a broad range of psychosocial variables act as risk or resilience factors, influencing the probability of developing a chronic pain condition, the severity of pain-related consequences such as disability, and the success or failure of various pain treatments.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > CONCLUSIONS
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The presence of chronic pain has a number of psychosocial and functional consequences in multiple areas of functioning - cognition, emotion, and behavior.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > CONCLUSIONS
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“very few functional neuroimaging studies have examined the neural underpinnings of pediatric chronic pain”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Pain-Specific Psychosocial Constructs > PAIN-RELATED CNS PATHWAYS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [403]
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Other neuroimaging work has highlighted maladaptive activity or connectivity in the amygdala 396, 398, 399.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Pain-Specific Psychosocial Constructs > PAIN-RELATED CNS PATHWAYS
What the sources say
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Probably not a substantial claim. 16
- It may state two separate claims as one. 65
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Collectively, the biopsychosocial approach describes pain and disability as a multidimensional, dynamic interaction among physiological, psychological, and social factors that reciprocally influence one another, resulting in chronic and complex pain syndromes7, 12.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Introduction
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The biopsychosocial model of pain dominates the scientific community’s understanding of chronic pain.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Historically, the concept of pain, even chronic pain, depended on a linear relationship between identifiable organic pathology and patient-reported symptoms.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Introduction
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Psychological factors were presumed to be primary mechanistic contributors to pain only in those cases where no identifiable pathology was present and the pain could be labeled as “psychogenic”.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Introduction
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In the first category, psychosocial processes either exist within an individual as pre-existing “vulnerability” factor [e.g., distress20–22, trauma23, 24] or emerge for the first time in response to the experience of ongoing pain [e.g., fear-avoidance behavior 25, self-efficacy26, 27].”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Introduction
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the report of pain is always subjective, influenced by a broad range of cognitive, behavioral, and affective constructs and processes.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Introduction
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“specific psychosocial characteristics place individuals at elevated risk for the transition from acute to persistent pain, or for the development of pain-related disability in the context of a persisting pain condition 15, 22, 28, 29.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Introduction
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The second category of mechanistic study involves delivery of some type of pain-related intervention that is hypothesized to directly affect a psychological factor, presuming that changing that psychosocial factor (e.g., reducing distress, improving pain-coping, etc) will be associated with a subsequent change in one or more pain-related outcomes.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Introduction
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“assessment, diagnosis, prognosis, and consequently treatment of the patient with persistent pain requires a broad strategy that examines and incorporates a wide range of psychosocial and behavioral factors in addition to, but not to the exclusion of, biomedical ones.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Introduction
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
In the paper
“patients in the upper half of the distribution of pre-operative depression scores were approximately ⅓ less likely to return to work and, among those who did return, took nearly twice as long post-operatively to begin working again 56.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > AFFECTIVE FACTORS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [56] source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“results of a 20-month longitudinal study indicate that depression and anxiety longitudinally predict pain and pain-related disability, however neither pain nor pain-related disability predicted depression and anxiety 21.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > AFFECTIVE FACTORS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [21] source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“PAIs are aimed at raising positive feelings, cognitions, and behaviors rather than reducing negative ones63.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > AFFECTIVE FACTORS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [63] source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Dispositional optimism has not only been linked to lower pain sensitivity, but a recent study by Hanssen and colleagues identified that optimism improves pain intensity through its effects on reducing situational pain catastrophizing 57.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > AFFECTIVE FACTORS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [57] source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These variables are not condition-specific; indeed most have been studied across diagnostic categories with similar results.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Introduction
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Several studies found that patients reporting positive general social support but lacking solicitous responses to pain were less likely to develop persistent phantom limb pain post-amputation and report lower levels of physical dysfunction 85, 107, 109.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > SOCIAL/INTERPERSONAL FACTORS
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Guillory and colleagues101 found that a text message-based social support intervention was effective in reducing pain severity and interference and increasing positive affect.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > SOCIAL/INTERPERSONAL FACTORS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [101] source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“experimental pain studies that demonstrate receiving social support during a pain task not only attenuates blood pressure, heart rate, and cortisol reactivity, but is also associated with reduced pain intensity and unpleasantness ratings and increased pain threshold 98–100.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > SOCIAL/INTERPERSONAL FACTORS
What the sources say
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“According to a metaanalysis of 23 studies, more than 50% of people diagnosed with TBI report chronic pain complaints 80, likely due to the associated physical injuries at the time of the TBI81.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > TRAUMA
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It remains unclear whether the association between trauma and later chronic pain is the result of the trauma or is driven by affective, cognitive, and behavioral responses to the traumatic event (e.g. fear and avoidance).”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > TRAUMA
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“there is significant comorbidity as well as symptom convergence between PTSD and TBI 82–84.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > TRAUMA
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“some childhood stressful events such as prolonged hospitalization are associated with chronic pain in adulthood while childhood surgery conferred no additional risk, despite the likelihood that surgery is a painful and distressing experience for children 67.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > TRAUMA
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [67] source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“PTSD, a psychiatric condition resulting from exposure to a traumatic event and characterized by hyperarousal, avoidance, and reexperiencing, is not only a risk factor for chronic pain 71, 72, but is associated with increased risk for the transition from acute to chronic pain.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > TRAUMA
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [71] source
- Not checked yetcites [72]
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“According to the stress-buffering hypothesis, negative consequences of stressors on health outcomes can be buffered by social support 86.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > SOCIAL/INTERPERSONAL FACTORS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [86] source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“parental pain catastrophizing is strongly related to the development of children’s persistent pain following major surgery 115, and to the child’s disability 116.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > SOCIAL/INTERPERSONAL FACTORS
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“compared to males, females demonstrate a decreased threshold and tolerance for pain and increased pain intensity and unpleasantness for heat, cold, ischemic, and pressure pain 150, 161–164”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > SEX AS A CONTRIBUTING PSYCHOBIOLOGICAL FACTOR
What the sources say
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Such discordance is likely to be common, especially in light of the “invisible” nature of pain, and it can have deleterious effects on patient satisfaction and adherence to treatment regimens 147.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > SOCIAL/INTERPERSONAL FACTORS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [147] source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Lack of social support at work, dissatisfaction with co-workers, and interactions with the disability compensation system are among the most potent predictors of pain-related work disability 89, 131, 132.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > SOCIAL/INTERPERSONAL FACTORS
What the sources say
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“musculoskeletal pain, rheumatoid arthritis, gastrointestinal, neuropathic, facial pain and headache are all more prevalent among females compared to males 156–160.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > SEX AS A CONTRIBUTING PSYCHOBIOLOGICAL FACTOR
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Individuals with anxious or insecure attachment styles are at elevated risk for poorer mental and physical health 128, for reduced engagement in physical activity 129, and for less treatment- related improvement in affective outcomes among patients participating in a multidisciplinary treatment program 130.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > SOCIAL/INTERPERSONAL FACTORS
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In a review, Unruh 155 found that, compared to men, women are more likely to experience recurrent pain, more severe pain, more frequent pain, and longer-lasting pain.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > SEX AS A CONTRIBUTING PSYCHOBIOLOGICAL FACTOR
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [155] source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Anxiety, which is associated with increased clinical pain and experimental pain sensitivity 161, 207”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > SEX AS A CONTRIBUTING PSYCHOBIOLOGICAL FACTOR
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Compared with males, females demonstrate increased sensitivity to pain-induced muscle reflexes 165 and show increased pupil dilation 166 as well as amplified cerebral activation in response to pain 167.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > SEX AS A CONTRIBUTING PSYCHOBIOLOGICAL FACTOR
What the sources say
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Compared to males, females exhibit a more pronounced temporal summation response 172–174 suggesting differences in the central processing of nociceptive stimuli.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > SEX AS A CONTRIBUTING PSYCHOBIOLOGICAL FACTOR
What the sources say
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Several studies indicate the DNIC response is more pronounced in males than females, suggesting better functioning of the endogenous pain inhibitory system among males 176–178.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > SEX AS A CONTRIBUTING PSYCHOBIOLOGICAL FACTOR
What the sources say
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“women show a higher μ opioid receptor binding at rest while men exhibit greater μ- opioid receptor binding in response to experimentally induced pain 192”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > SEX AS A CONTRIBUTING PSYCHOBIOLOGICAL FACTOR
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [192] source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Males often adopt the masculine gender norm of increased pain tolerance while females adopt a norm accepting pain as a normal part of life 193.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > SEX AS A CONTRIBUTING PSYCHOBIOLOGICAL FACTOR
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [193] source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“has been suggested as a potential mediator of sex differences in pain sensitivity 208.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > SEX AS A CONTRIBUTING PSYCHOBIOLOGICAL FACTOR
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [208]
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Using the Gender Role Expectation of Pain (GREP) questionnaire, Robinson and colleagues found that women were considered more sensitive to pain, less enduring of pain, and more willing to report pain compared to men 194, 198, 200.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > SEX AS A CONTRIBUTING PSYCHOBIOLOGICAL FACTOR
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“a recent study demonstrated that males endorsing greater masculine gender traits are more likely to participate pain studies, offering a potential explanation for sex differences in pain responses 199.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > SEX AS A CONTRIBUTING PSYCHOBIOLOGICAL FACTOR
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [199] source
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“studies demonstrating similar prevalence across prepubescent males and females for conditions such as migraine and temporomandibular disorders with differences in prevalence emerging after puberty 149, 182–184.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > SEX AS A CONTRIBUTING PSYCHOBIOLOGICAL FACTOR
What the sources say
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“sex differences in pain threshold were no longer significant after controlling for willingness to report pain and sex differences in temporal summation of heat pain was partially mediated by willingness to report pain 200.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > SEX AS A CONTRIBUTING PSYCHOBIOLOGICAL FACTOR
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [200]
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, it remains unclear whether depression mediates the sex differences in pain perception.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > SEX AS A CONTRIBUTING PSYCHOBIOLOGICAL FACTOR
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“several studies have shown that anxiety is positively correlated with pain sensitivity among males, but not females 211, 212”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > SEX AS A CONTRIBUTING PSYCHOBIOLOGICAL FACTOR
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Depression, which is highly comorbid with pain, is also more prevalent in women than men; among individuals with depression, women are more likely to report pain complaints than men 213, 214”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > SEX AS A CONTRIBUTING PSYCHOBIOLOGICAL FACTOR
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [213] source
- Not checked yetcites [214]
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Black individuals are more prone than non-Hispanic Whites to experience hypertension and show cardiovascular reactivity to pain, which may, in turn, influence their pain perception 230.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > RACE AS A CONTRIBUTING PSYCHOBIOLOGICAL FACTOR
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [230] source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Approximately 20% of individuals with chronic pain also have depression, while less than 7% of the general population experiences this disorder, and these findings hold not just for the U.S. but around the world 231–235.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > RACE AS A CONTRIBUTING PSYCHOBIOLOGICAL FACTOR
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Similar findings have been noted for Asian Americans, who report a greater intensity of daily joint pain than non-Hispanic whites, and who demonstrate enhanced sensitivity to thermal and mechanical pain stimuli applied in a laboratory setting 225, 226.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > RACE AS A CONTRIBUTING PSYCHOBIOLOGICAL FACTOR
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Black patients are less likely to receive effective treatment and more likely than Whites to rate their depression as severe and disabling 237–241.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > RACE AS A CONTRIBUTING PSYCHOBIOLOGICAL FACTOR
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Beyond psychological distress, pain-specific factors such as appraisals, expectations, and coping are also related to pain sensitivity and may influence the race differences observed in the pain experience.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > RACE AS A CONTRIBUTING PSYCHOBIOLOGICAL FACTOR
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Multiple published studies have suggested that a greater degree of perceived daily racial discrimination is associated with elevated rates of chronic pain and enhanced sensitivity to pain in the laboratory among samples of African-American participants 252–254.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > RACE AS A CONTRIBUTING PSYCHOBIOLOGICAL FACTOR
What the sources say
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“An abundance of evidence links depression and anxiety to chronic pain and increased pain sensitivity 11, 13, 32, 41.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > RACE AS A CONTRIBUTING PSYCHOBIOLOGICAL FACTOR
What the sources say
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In addition to the socioeconomic strain often associated with minority status, Black individuals are frequently exposed to racism 248–250.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > RACE AS A CONTRIBUTING PSYCHOBIOLOGICAL FACTOR
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Although Blacks are less likely than non-Hispanic Whites to report experiencing depression and anxiety, the chronicity of Major Depressive Disorder is higher among Black individuals than Caucasians, and Black patients are less likely to receive effective treatment and more likely than Whites to rate their depression as severe and disabling 237–241.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > RACE AS A CONTRIBUTING PSYCHOBIOLOGICAL FACTOR
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Black individuals demonstrate a lower tolerance and report higher pain intensity and unpleasantness ratings than non-Hispanic Whites during experimental pain tasks 162, 221–224”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > RACE AS A CONTRIBUTING PSYCHOBIOLOGICAL FACTOR
What the sources say
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Another hypothesis relates to sociocultural factors that cause chronic stress, especially in Black individuals.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > General Psychosocial Factors > RACE AS A CONTRIBUTING PSYCHOBIOLOGICAL FACTOR
hedgedconditional- Asserted: fails — The authors may not put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“catastrophizing is associated with higher pain levels, poorer physical functioning and disability, and increased pain interference 13, 32, 278, 279.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Pain-Specific Psychosocial Constructs > PAIN COPING
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Likewise, hoping and praying is also correlated with higher levels of disability, more pain interference, and increased pain severity 280–283.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Pain-Specific Psychosocial Constructs > PAIN COPING
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“recent evidence suggests that catastrophizing may be the principal psychosocial driver of persistent pain symptoms, statistically mediating the prospective influence of factors such as anxiety on post-operative pain outcomes 302.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Pain-Specific Psychosocial Constructs > CATASTROPHIZING
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [302] source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Active coping strategies, for example, have been linked to positive affect, better psychological adjustment, and decreased depression while passive strategies are linked to poorer outcomes such as increased pain and depression 258, 267–270.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Pain-Specific Psychosocial Constructs > PAIN COPING
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Differences in pain coping are associated with differences in pain intensity, adjustment to chronic pain, and psychological and physical functioning 85, 263–266.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Pain-Specific Psychosocial Constructs > PAIN COPING
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Further, catastrophizing is a risk factor for the development of chronic pain, pain-related disability, increased healthcare costs, and increased pain sensitivity for low back pain and joint pain 13.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Pain-Specific Psychosocial Constructs > CATASTROPHIZING
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [13] source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Vlaeyen and colleagues suggest that avoidance behavior persists due to certain beliefs, such as catastrophic cognitions 25, 337, 338.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Pain-Specific Psychosocial Constructs > CATASTROPHIZING
What the sources say
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Pain-related expectations also influence the experience of pain as well as treatment outcomes.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Pain-Specific Psychosocial Constructs > EXPECTATIONS
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“both solicitous and punishing responses to pain are associated with higher pain intensity 108 and increased depressive symptoms 106, 340, suggesting these social factors may be a mechanism by which catastrophizing affects pain outcomes.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Pain-Specific Psychosocial Constructs > CATASTROPHIZING
What the sources say
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Generalized positive outcome expectancy, or dispositional optimism 348–350, is related to increased feelings of control, the use of more active coping strategies, and better functional performance 91, 351–353.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Pain-Specific Psychosocial Constructs > EXPECTATIONS
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“associations between catastrophizing and perceived solicitous responses 339, 340, 343, perceived instrumental support 103, and perceived critical responses to pain 106 have been observed.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Pain-Specific Psychosocial Constructs > CATASTROPHIZING
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Expectations are related to overall well-being and the development of chronic pain and are also a critical component of responses to treatment for both placebo and active treatments 346,347.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Pain-Specific Psychosocial Constructs > EXPECTATIONS
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“in a recent analysis of large acupuncture trials revealed that both patient and provider expectations for treatment success were strong predictors of response, with better pretreatment expectations predicting improved post-treatment pain and physical functioning 362, 364.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Pain-Specific Psychosocial Constructs > EXPECTATIONS
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In samples of adults and children with chronic headaches, pain-related self-efficacy is associated with less disability, better functioning, and fewer depressive symptoms 370, 371.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Pain-Specific Psychosocial Constructs > SELF-EFFICACY
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Self-efficacy, or an individual’s belief in his ability to perform a behavior or achieve a desired outcome 26, 273, determines thoughts, feelings, and behaviors in stressful situations and affects one’s ability to cope successfully when confronted with challenges 367, 368.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Pain-Specific Psychosocial Constructs > SELF-EFFICACY
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Pain-related self-efficacy, a protective factor for patients with persistent pain and a resiliency factorfor children, adolescents, and adults with chronic pain 270, predicts functional pain outcomes.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Pain-Specific Psychosocial Constructs > SELF-EFFICACY
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [270] source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“A growing number of neuroimaging studies have suggested that variability in catastrophizing is associated with individual differences in the functional brain response to a variety of stimuli, as well as potential alterations in brain morphology 359, 384, 387, 389–395.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Pain-Specific Psychosocial Constructs > PAIN-RELATED CNS PATHWAYS
What the sources say
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Likewise, Mindfulness-based Stress Reduction (MBSR) has similar effects on self-efficacy, with no significant differences between CBT and MBSR in their effect on improving self-efficacy 376”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Pain-Specific Psychosocial Constructs > SELF-EFFICACY
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [376] source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“it is important to acknowledge that psychological and social factors are not solely secondary reactions to persistent pain; rather, they form an interactive complex of biopsychosocial processes that characterizes chronic pain.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > CONCLUSIONS
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A study in patients with chronic low back pain reported that patients had exaggerated and abnormal amygdala connectivity with central executive network structures, and this connectivity was most exaggerated in patients with the greatest pain catastrophizing 385.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Pain-Specific Psychosocial Constructs > PAIN-RELATED CNS PATHWAYS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [385] source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Moreover, the context in which individuals reside will also have an important role.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > CONCLUSIONS
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“negative affective responses to pain, and pain-related catastrophizing are as prominent in adolescent patients 400–402”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Pain-Specific Psychosocial Constructs > PAIN-RELATED CNS PATHWAYS
What the sources say
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“a very recent study in patients with fibromyalgia reported reduced connectivity between periaqueductal gray (a critical hub for pain-inhibitory circuits) and prefrontal regions, and the patients highest in catastrophizing showed the highest degree of anti-correlation between these regions 395.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > Pain-Specific Psychosocial Constructs > PAIN-RELATED CNS PATHWAYS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [395] source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Since chronic pain persists overtime, each of these areas will, in turn, affect the experience and reporting of pain and related symptoms.”
§ Evaluating Psychosocial Contributions to Chronic Pain Outcomes > CONCLUSIONS
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
Race has a significant role in how pain develops and is experienced.
“Race, which plays an important role in the development and experience of pain, should always be considered when assessing psychosocial factors related to pain.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The existing pain literature has mostly studied differences between Black and White individuals.
“Although there is considerable racial diversity throughout the United States, the current pain literature has primarily examined race differences between Black and White individuals.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Racial minority groups are often combined in research, which restricts the conclusions that can be made.
“Further, racial minority groups are frequently grouped together (e.g. non-White, Asian/other) in the literature, limiting any conclusions that otherwise could be drawn.”
The paper relies on this without support.
How a person appraises pain can affect their pain-related responses.
“Such pain appraisals can, in turn, impact pain related responses.”
The paper relies on this without support.
People with chronic pain may avoid everyday activities that make their pain worse.
“Individuals with chronic pain may avoid daily activities that increase pain.”
The paper relies on this without support.
If avoidance continues past the normal healing period, physical deconditioning can cause more pain and discomfort during later activities.
“However, when this avoidance occurs beyond the expected healing time for an injury, they may experience physical deconditioning which leads to increased pain and discomfort when performing future activities.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Deconditioning and worse pain then lead to more avoidance.
“The deconditioning and worsened pain then results in increased avoidance.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Behavioral intervention strategies that are grounded in the biopsychosocial theory of pain7, and target psychosocial factors thought to contribute to persistent pain in interaction with underlying central neurobiological processing and peripheral afferent inputs6, 8–11, may be especially well suited to ameliorate PSP among breast cancer suvivors6, 8.”
From Improving well-being for individuals with persistent pain after surgery for breast cancer, lobular carcinoma in situ, or ductal carcinoma in situ: A randomized clinical trial (2022) · cites this paper as [8]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The increased anxiety symptoms observed in adults with HSD and hEDS align with the anxiety seen in other chronic pain populations, including patients with rheumatoid arthritis.65, 66, 67, 68”
From Role of Anxiety in Individuals with Generalized Joint Hypermobility: A Systematic Review (2025) · cites this paper as [65]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“But chronic pain is a complex phenomenon that includes psychological and social components in addition to biological components (bio-psycho-social model).[2]”
From Mindfulness influences the psycho-social dimension of chronic pain: A randomized controlled clinical trial in Indian context (2023) · cites this paper as [2]
Citations
Cites
Eysenck, H. J. (1985) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/0005-7967(85)90087-7 · Cited by 32,038
“Stress: appraisal and coping,”
Folkman, S. (2013) · Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1005-9_215 · Cited by 27,833
Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis
Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.310 · Cited by 18,093
The Need for a New Medical Model: A Challenge for Biomedicine
Engel, G. L. (1977) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.847460 · Cited by 12,887
Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach.
Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., & Weintraub, J. K. (1989) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.56.2.267 · Cited by 11,507
Human agency in social cognitive theory.
Bandura, A. (1989) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.44.9.1175 · Cited by 8,263
The Pain Catastrophizing Scale: Development and validation.
Sullivan, M. J. L., Bishop, S. R., & Pivik, J. (1995) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037//1040-3590.7.4.524 · Cited by 8,227
Scheier, M. F., Carver, C. S., & Bridges, M. W. (1994) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.67.6.1063 · Cited by 7,456
Central sensitization: implications for the diagnosis and treatment of pain
Woolf, C. J. (2011) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2010.09.030 · Cited by 4,771
Depression and Pain Comorbidity: A Literature Review
Bair, M. J., Robinson, R. L., Katon, W., & Kroenke, K. (2003) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.163.20.2433 · Cited by 3,463
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Fillingim, 1998, Sex differences in temporal summation but not sensory-discriminative processing of thermal pain, Pain, 75, 121, 10.1016/S0304-3959(97)00214-5 · DOI · Paper page
- Novy, 1998, Coping with chronic pain: sources of intrinsic and contextual validity, J. Behav. Med., 21, 19, 10.1023/A:1018711420797 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Chronic pain: an update on burden, best practices, and new advances
Cohen, S. P., Vase, L., & Hooten, W. M. (2021) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00393-7 · Cited by 2,614
Applying a biopsychosocial model to migraine: rationale and clinical implications
Rosignoli, C., Ornello, R., Onofri, A., Caponnetto, V., Grazzi, L., Raggi, A., Leonardi, M., & Sacco, S. (2022) · The Journal of Headache and Pain · doi:10.1186/s10194-022-01471-3 · Cited by 138
Associations between chronic pain, anxiety, and depression among adults in the United States
Mullins, P. M., Yong, R. J., & Bhattacharyya, N. (2023) · Pain Practice · doi:10.1111/papr.13220 · Cited by 98
Murphy, J. L., Palyo, S. A., Schmidt, Z. S., Hollrah, L. N., Banou, E., Van Keuren, C. P., & Strigo, I. A. (2021) · Pain Medicine · doi:10.1093/pm/pnaa417 · Cited by 54
Transition from Acute to Chronic Pain: Where Cells, Systems and Society Meet
Glare, P., Overton, S., & Aubrey, K. (2020) · Pain Management · doi:10.2217/pmt-2019-0039 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Meints, S. M., & Edwards, R. R.
- Affiliations
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- Corresponding author
- Meints, S.M.
- Venue
- Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-12
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- Pt B
- Pages
- 168-182
- ISSN
- 0278-5846 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6067990
- OpenAlex
- W2789899473
- Cited by
- 719
- References
- 410
- Citations by year
- 2026: 124 · 2025: 139 · 2024: 122 · 2023: 148 · 2022: 71 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 4
- FWCI
- 3.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (T32 AR055855)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
- Keywords
- chronic pain, biopsychosocial model, psychosocial factors, pain catastrophizing, pain coping, distress, trauma, interpersonal factors, disability, pain maintenance
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Humans, Pain Measurement, Catastrophization, Chronic Pain
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-09-28, under version 3 of the claim definition (prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-09-28 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review